| >What's everyone's problem with beastars None. I thought it was well received. |
| MEA·MENTVLA·INGENS·EST |
| I don't think it's badly recieved. It's pretty popular and has a pretty good score, but people tend to stear clear from furry and cgi shows. So I guess you can't blame them, if they aren't ready to try something new. |
| I think a lot of people definately avoided it, but I don't think anyone has really had anything bad to say about it from what I have heard (as long as they watched it). but yeah no suprise ur saying people are getting made fun of watching it, but I doubt those people who are making fun are even anime fans to begin with as anyone who knows anything about beastars, knows that it is a well respected show. |
| I have not seen people complaining about it. It is also a really good show. |
 |
| Thread moved from Anime Discussion. |
Enrav1x said: Why would SAO fans not like the show? I like SAO and aside from getting used to the 3d animation of this show, I am having no issues liking it.it was pretty good and i don't think anyone with good taste in anime will dislike it let alone make fun. I can imagine those people as fans of a certain show called SAO |
| The line below is True. The line above is False. |
| We shouldn't deny it, there is a problem with this show's reception. Going from 8.42 to 8.08 in just one year after it finished airing isn't a normal score degradation. anitown said: What's everyone's problem with beastars, people shouldn't ride it off because of a few sus scenes, yes it's really weird, but cmon, it was a good show. People who haven't even seen it are making fun of people for watching. Personally I enjoyed most of it. Mod Edit: Modified title for clarity and/or easier searching. I guess it's just as you said, it's getting downvoted for the scenes you're referring to. Quite ironically, those are also one of the reasons why these furries are more human-like than the human characters of 90% of the existing anime. |
Nirinbo said: We shouldn't deny it, there is a problem with this show's reception. Going from 8.42 to 8.08 in just one year after it finished airing isn't a normal score degradation. anitown said: What's everyone's problem with beastars, people shouldn't ride it off because of a few sus scenes, yes it's really weird, but cmon, it was a good show. People who haven't even seen it are making fun of people for watching. Personally I enjoyed most of it. Mod Edit: Modified title for clarity and/or easier searching. I guess it's just as you said, it's getting downvoted for the scenes you're referring to. Quite ironically, those are also one of the reasons why these furries are more human-like than the human characters of 90% of the existing anime. It also seems to indicate that, for whatever reason, people who watched the show before it was on Netflix liked it a lot more than Netflix's audience. |
Air-117 said: Nirinbo said: We shouldn't deny it, there is a problem with this show's reception. Going from 8.42 to 8.08 in just one year after it finished airing isn't a normal score degradation. I guess it's just as you said, it's getting downvoted for the scenes you're referring to. Quite ironically, those are also one of the reasons why these furries are more human-like than the human characters of 90% of the existing anime. It also seems to indicate that, for whatever reason, people who watched the show before it was on Netflix liked it a lot more than Netflix's audience. The more people watch an anime, the higher is the percentage of inexperienced ones, usually handing out 10s very easily (hence why almost every battle shonen is overrated). This had the opposite effect on Beastars: less "expert" watchers wouldn't bother checking out illegal streaming sites to watch it before it came on Netflix, so the early high score reflected the experts' reception (and this doesn't mean that they love furries, but that they can appreciate the quality writing without being offended by them); then the mainstream audience watched it and hated it for the reasons we know. Lesson learnt: the terms "overrated" and "underrated" do exist and are not just subjective opinions; they can be used when the mainstream, less experienced, audience appreciate a show much more or much less than the more expert watchers. |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Beastars Episode 4 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Oct 30, 2019 |
112 |
by Kayarbee70
»»
Apr 10, 8:09 PM |
|
Poll: » Beastars Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Oct 16, 2019 |
178 |
by Kayarbee70
»»
Apr 10, 7:27 PM |
|
Poll: » Beastars Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Dec 25, 2019 |
199 |
by chittripper1
»»
Feb 18, 8:06 AM |
|
Poll: » Beastars Episode 10 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Dec 11, 2019 |
114 |
by Kvistis
»»
Jan 11, 12:30 AM |
|
Poll: » Beastars Episode 8 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Nov 27, 2019 |
115 |
by Kvistis
»»
Jan 10, 11:54 PM |