| Every time I share an infowars article or video it gets locked or is deleted on this site? Why is that? Are they actually not a reputable news source? Who said info wars is fake news? So your telling me the underground sex ring scandal in the pizza shop was fake news? Also the syrian chemical attack which is a hoax according to info wars and russian news actually happened? Why is BBC considered real news where's their credibility or Fox? Next you're gonna tell me globalresearch.ca is fake news as well. |
| mods apparently think videos of an event are fake news. |
 Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| Because they perpetuate false information in order to shill overpriced goods? |
nicethings said: literally a site that supports and frequently screeches conspiracy theories and has a rambling madman who talks about gay frogs, reptilians, goblins, and baby blood, and the other members of the team besides jones are also fucking moronic excuses for “reporters” lmfao it’s totally reliable guise even faux and cnn more reliable, at least they have bare minimum resemblances to news despite their shitty biases meanwhile infowars is full of the worst kind of raging loonies Come on it's an interesting twist on events (infowars) and it makes you think deeper like maybe there IS a reason why this happened. |
| That moment when you unironically cite the pizza shop story that was literally disproven at pretty much every level (including an armed vigilante physically checking the shop himself) and question whether it was fake news. Basically what I'm saying is yes it's fake news, they are not a reputable source, "an interesting twist on events" is as factual as a person writing fanfiction. So to expand that comparison sure fanfiction is an interesting way to look at an event in a series, but that doesn't mean it isn't also total bs in relation to the series. |
nicethings said: HarryRambod22 said: Come on it's an interesting twist on events (infowars) and it makes you think deeper like maybe there IS a reason why this happened. nope their site has the deepness and intellectual stimulation of a dried puddle of vomit on a nyc sidewalk Yeah but some of their stories were true like the nsa spying on us, rockefeller's power in the usa, amazon running smaller businesses into the ground, and pepsi using dead baby parts as flavoring in their drinks. |
deg said: >globalresearch.ca is fake news as well obviously its fake news https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Globalresearch even infowars https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Alex_Jones >using rationalwiki as a source for anything  |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| Considering that there main audience is conspiracy theorists, and they try to sell them stuff like alpha male pills or protective shield brain boosters, doesn't seem that far off to consider it fake news |
deg said: raitionalwiki was created to fight pseudoscience and fake news https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RationalWiki self-described aims, yes. rationalwiki was literally created by lefty trolls after they got btfo when they tried to mess with conservapedia or w/e it's called. i don't know how you can read rationalwiki and think it's not just a circlejerk for biased leftist ideologues. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| It's considered fake news because it is fake news. (At least much of the time.) Watch this. lmao |
 |
SadMadoka said: It's considered fake news because it is fake news. (At least much of the time.) Watch this. lmao Uh John Oliver is a leftist comedian he is constantly pushing his globalist agenda down his audiences throat. I can't get behind that. |
HarryRambod22 said: SadMadoka said: It's considered fake news because it is fake news. (At least much of the time.) Watch this. lmao Uh John Oliver is a leftist comedian he is constantly pushing his globalist agenda down his audiences throat. I can't get behind that. Yes, John Oliver is a leftist comedian (all major comedians are leftist) but it is common sense that Alex Jones is just plain crazy |
HarryRambod22 said: Uh John Oliver is a leftist comedian he is constantly pushing his globalist agenda down his audiences throat. I can't get behind that. You didn't even watch it. -_- Regardless, it's a well-known fact that Infowars spouts crazy nonsense that has been thoroughly debunked. |
|
| Alex Jones has long been a slave of the reptilians. His news... well... I wouldn't trust it. |
| I CELEBRATE myself, And what I assume you shall assume, For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you. |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: self-described aims, yes. rationalwiki was literally created by lefty trolls after they got btfo when they tried to mess with conservapedia or w/e it's called. i don't know how you can read rationalwiki and think it's not just a circlejerk for biased leftist ideologues. check at the bottom of rationalwiki articles they list their sources/references for what they are saying and its common knowledge that infowars and globalresearch are conspiracy news sites anyway nobody is saying alex isn't a bit nutty. what i'm trying to tell you is that you don't need a biased fedora website to tell you that. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: nobody is saying alex isn't a bit nutty. what i'm trying to tell you is that you don't need a biased fedora website to tell you that. ok but rationalwiki is more reliable than you think it is, its just against your own bias worldview right? we all have biases anyway but there are less bias sources out there it really isn't, but ok. i'm not ok with deluded far-leftist ideologues that are dishonest when dealing with anything that opposes their idealogy, you got me. is that a bad thing? |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
deg said: no, i'm pretty sure a lot of them identify as far-left or have far-left views, it's not just me labeling them.Yomiyuki said: it really isn't, but ok. i'm not ok with deluded far-leftist ideologues that are dishonest when dealing with anything that opposes their idealogy, you got me. is that a bad thing? you can label it far left just to make it extreme but its the same with alt-right bias news sources being extreme too anyway i got left bias and you got right bias the difference is which bias is more accepted and will give a less shitty future for the majority (and not just a few) i'll read news stories from either left or right viewpoints, i'm right leaning yes, but not so biased that i'll ignore opposing viewpoints like most people on here do. and yes, left bias is heavily accepted and encouraged, but ultimately right-wing ideals are what'll help countries get better. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
nicethings said: deg said: you can label it far left just to make it extreme but its the same with alt-right bias news sources being extreme too anyway i got left bias and you got right bias the difference is which bias is more accepted and will give a less shitty future for the majority (and not just a few) > rationalwiki is apparently "far left" because it calls out, documents the asshole actions of, and satirizes toxic neonazis on the extreme right? > oh how dare we mistreat those RACIST NEONAZIIIIS > fucking topkek that's the best joke i've heard all week i don't understand why you try to interject with shit that i didn't even say. where did i say they are far left because of them calling out nazis? god fucking damn the dishonesty ffs. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
deg said: yes, extremists are bad, everyone knows this.Yomiyuki said: no, i'm pretty sure a lot of them identify as far-left or have far-left views, it's not just me labeling them. no i'm not really biased, i'll read news stories from either left or right viewpoints. and yes, left bias is heavily accepted and encouraged, but ultimately right-wing ideals are what'll help countries get better. lets see right bias believes in social darwinism (so they push for racism and sexism and other discrimination for example), they believe the poor deserves to be poor, they do not believe in man made climate change that endangers the future, most are so religious heck islamic terrorism is right bias anyway, and more i do not think that is good for the world nicethings said: > rationalwiki is apparently "far left" because it calls out, documents the asshole actions of, and satirizes toxic neonazis on the extreme right? > oh how dare we mistreat those RACIST NEONAZIIIIS > fucking topkek that's the best joke i've heard all week ye i agree, but lets just agree that we all have biases since our brains are not omniscient to know the best |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: yes, extremists are bad, everyone knows this. so how come RationalWiki is extremist again compared to InfoWars for example? infowars is nutty, but i don't think they're extremist in the way you mean. like openly sexist and racist, unless you can show me proofs or something since i don't really watch them. when i said extremist i was referring to the people you were talking about on the right that are racists, sexists, etc. they shouldn't poison the well for you just like rationalwiki doesn't poison the well for me. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| I mean, why even enforce such stringent regulation on an anime forum? Just let us source whatever, and the people will decide whether or not to trust the source. This kind if coddling is frankly insulting.. Anyway, in regards to infowars. I remember hearing that they've been right on a few things, but most of the time they're extremely biased and ridiculous. But does that mean they, or any other biased/fake news source should be banned? No, let us decide. |
╮ (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.) ╭ |
deg said: you can literally read handfuls of articles on that site that show their far-left bias.Yomiyuki said: infowars is nutty, but i don't think they're extremist in the way you mean. like openly sexist and racist, unless you can show me proofs or something since i don't really watch them. when i said extremist i was referring to the people you were talking about on the right that are racists, sexists, etc. they shouldn't poison the well for you just like rationalwiki doesn't poison the well for me. ye you are claiming that RationalWiki is extremist site but i do not see any proof of that heck i do not see a lot of people saying its a extremist left bias site to begin with unlike InfoWars that is considered by many as extreme right bias source and since you want to take the word of what a group of people say about a website, look at the results of the poll here that shows you how many people think they have a far-left bias. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/ i can show you more reasons why i don't like the site and instances of their bias if you want, but that'll take a while. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: you can literally read handfuls of articles on that site that show their far-left bias. and since you want to take the word of what a group of people say about a website, look at the results of the poll here that shows you how many people think they have a far-left bias. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/ i can show you more reasons why i don't like the site and instances of their bias if you want, but that'll take a while. it says this for RationalWiki Factual Reporting: HIGH it says this for InfoWars https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/infowars-alex-jones/ Factual Reporting: LOW where in this thread am i telling you that i think infowars is very factual. literally where. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: where in this thread am i telling you that i think infowars is very factual. literally where. dude you are defending InfoWars when you said this "infowars is nutty, but i don't think they're extremist in the way you mean." while claiming RationalWiki have far left ideologies when you said this "i'm not ok with deluded far-leftist ideologues that are dishonest when dealing with anything that opposes their idealogy" and also is WashingtonPost and New York Times also extremists? how am i defending infowars by me agreeing that they're nutty lmaoo??? i haven't watched infowars since the election so i don't know if they're extremist like you mean, that's why i asked you to show me so i can see. rationalwiki does have far-leftist ideologies, not because they condemn nazis or w/e that random ass misinterpretation was, but because of their general attitude towards even people that just center-right. no, washington post and new york times are not extremists, who would think that? |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| Because Alex Jones is fucking insane. People seem to hate them for one person alone and that one person is Alex Jones. All news sometimes does fake stuff though. I don't even like infowars and my beliefs are mostly conservative. |
 |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: how am i defending infowars by me agreeing that they're nutty lmaoo??? i haven't watched infowars since the election so i don't know if they're extremist like you mean, that's why i asked you to show me so i can see. rationalwiki does have far-leftist ideologies, not because they condemn nazis or w/e that random ass misinterpretation was, but because of their general attitude towards even people that just center-right. no, washington post and new york times are not extremists, who would think that? you are implying that InfoWars is better than the established factual reporting of RationalWiki well at least you are not claiming WashingtonPost and New York Times are extremists since they are like RationalWiki too with factual reporting where did i imply this. i think alex is more entertaining than basement dwelling pseduo-intellectuals that probably voted hilary anyway, but no, i don't really go to infowars for factual reporting. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
HarryRambod22 said: The Syrian chemical Attack wasn't a Hoax, but is believed to be a False Flag. Source: Middle Eastern Correspondents on German public Broadcasters.Also the syrian chemical attack which is a hoax according to info wars and russian news actually happened? |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: where did i imply this. i think alex is more entertaining than basement dwelling pseduo-intellectuals that probably voted hilary anyway, but no, i don't really go to infowars for factual reporting. thats what i get because you are dismissing RationalWiki that is known for factual reporting by your own source while now you are saying InfoWars is entertainment so its better at least? lol thats how right bias is to me too they are just for entertainment and when things gets serious and corrected then they will say its just a prank bro! man, you need to stop misinterpreting things i say. i clearly didn't say they're better, i said i think alex is more entertaining than the kind of people i mentioned. where did i say it's better? i'm not even gonna bother with that last part of your post because it's implying that i take infowars or alex's ramblings serious. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: man, you need to stop misinterpreting things i say. i clearly didn't say they're better, i said i think alex is more entertaining than the kind of people i mentioned. where did i say it's better? i'm not even gonna bother with that last part of your post because it's implying that i take infowars or alex's ramblings serious. err except you did think its serious reporting when you said this earlier Yomiyuki said: "mods apparently think videos of an event are fake news. again with the misinterpretations. how does me saying that = me thinking infowars is serious reporting. i meant the video of the event was real. are you going to say the video that was posted wasn't real? it was filmed in front of a green screen or something?? |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
deg said: Yomiyuki said: again with the misinterpretations. how does me saying that = me thinking infowars is serious reporting. i meant the video of the event was real. are you going to say the video that was posted wasn't real? it was filmed in front of a green screen or something?? then why are you against RationalWiki more than InfoWars on this thread? if you care about factual sources? that this thread is all about inaction or not enough condemnation of something doesn't mean i whole-heartedly support that thing. i don't care for infowars. nobody i know or talk to with right-wing views similar to mine takes them seriously, or considers them to be this revered place for factual reporting. i am against rationalwiki, because that's where the topic turned to. i have told you again and again in this thread how much i don't care for infowars, but you keep insisting that i do just because i'm expressing my dislike for rationalwiki to you. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
More topics from this board
» Silly ways of making moneytraed - Oct 10 |
17 |
by XMGA030
»»
6 minutes ago |
|
» What do you think of vegans feeding vegan diets to their cats? Aren't they ironically the ones doing animal abuse?fleurbleue - Oct 7 |
21 |
by Freshell
»»
6 minutes ago |
|
» If anime/manga are the only mediums you consume, how much are you missing?thewiru - 26 minutes ago |
1 |
by XMGA030
»»
9 minutes ago |
|
» Cute animals you'd never want as a petTheBlockernator - 7 hours ago |
7 |
by vasipi4946
»»
36 minutes ago |
|
» Do you have a personal goal you're working toward right now?JustDefending - Oct 1 |
34 |
by MissHeed
»»
47 minutes ago |