New
Apr 5, 2013 2:18 PM
#151
-grabs popcorn- This is another reason why I love MAL <3 |
Apr 5, 2013 2:20 PM
#152
Sophilia said: -grabs popcorn- This is another reason why I love MAL <3 http://myanimelist.net/irc/ |
"If you love someone Follow your heart Cause love comes once If you’re lucky enough" |
Apr 5, 2013 2:22 PM
#153
I feel bad for people getting harassed by TheAutocrat. So much that it reminded me to dig this up. Immahnoob said: Guide to know what Autocrat will say next: Did he talk about his political views/gave his opinions on the life he didnt live yet/etc? - No - Just wait a few more posts. - Yes - Did you disagree with his conspiracy theories/views/etc? - No - He will probably befriend you or compliment you. - Yes - Good, how did you disagree? - By saying his views are conspiracies and make no sense (ambiguous), derail, etc - You will get the "You have no insight", "You will see, I will become something in the future.", "You cannot grasp reality!". 2) Did you respond to his bullshit again? - No - He will leave the thread probably, if he gets ignored he'll feel omnipotent enough to leave you alone and he'll think he won. - Yes - He will probably start bending logic to his will and situation and will call you (in no specific order) - hypocrite, arrogant, deluded, pretentious, blind, obnoxious, unwise and will use other ad hominem too. Be prepared, because most of these he'll use them in the same post. 3) So, you're still continuing this? No - Good Lord! Leave the thread faster, you're going to be okay, no need for medical care I guess. He'll think he won though, so next time you talk to him be prepared to get attacked again. Yes - How did you respond? - I argued normally - Go back to 2). - I called the immense amount of fallacies - "You do not know in what context fallacies must be used, you use logic only when you want to and have no points, I won." 4) You want me to give you more?! Fine... So, how did you argue the fallacy part? - I've told him that he does not understand that committing to logic in arguments and not anywhere else is just normal - He'll probably tell you you're wrong, he's starting to slip around here. Around here he'll start saying he "won". - I've told him what fallacies are - He'll start slipping and most likely insult you in some way. Around here he'll start saying he "won". 5) ??? There's nothing more to say, to be honest, I've only got this far only once... It will repeat if you don't stop at 4). But he'll slip a lot, have fun. |
Apr 5, 2013 2:29 PM
#154
TheAutocrat said: Akito_Kinomoto said: TheAutocrat said: Nicole said: TheAutocrat said: This is your major personality flaw that I'm talking about. You act all stuck-up like, "Hmph, sorry for not using a word correctly, my bad, ha" It's sarky and filled with arrogance. You don't even have an effing clue where this conversation is heading. You you feel you must "stick up yourself" by any means, you have minimal humility. It's highly obnoxious and a major turn-off fyi, just saying. You just took what Goryo said and tried to throw it down my throat as a conversation-ender then swiftly changed the topic. *sigh* Now, you didn't even use the word correctly - as needless as it was - and you ignored the consequences of saying such a thing. When you start throwing around the word inherently you damn better be ready to justify yourself, girl. Because used in this context it invites a shitload of criticism. I will argue against it, but this thread needs to stay on topic, so I will abstain. If you had said, "most people are good", you would have got away with it. It's the fact you used a word without considering the consequences and now find yourself in a position unable to justify yourself. Though I'll give you a chance. Go on, Google up and conjure an argument and post it on my wall if you want. Else-wise, you are wrong. Do you know what your problem is? You're always looking for an argument, even if there isn't really one to be had. I used the world correctly, and to be quite honest, even if I didn't use it correctly, your little rant (which was ridiculously stupid) has made me not give a damn even in the slightest about whether it was correctly used at all. You're just always looking for a reason to attack people on something, always looking for a reason to show off your incredibly level of intelligence. Thanks! Talking about my intelligence like that brought a huge smile to my face! :) I'm not "always" looking for an argument, that is a prejudgment as you are basically saying, "I look for arguments all the time when I interact with people" You obviously do not have enough information to make this judgment. This is a forum, MAL to be specific, and is argumentative by nature. If I find something questionable or wrong then I will point it out at my whim, no questions asked there. There is no problem with that. You do not have information about me in neutral, or irl environments thus your argument is invalid. Next couple of lines: 1. You fully assert you used it correctly then immediately doubt yourself and imply that you actually think you might be wrong. Well played, see the contradiction? Ultimately you are just trying to save face. 2. Clearly there was not a shred of stupidity in my "rant". If you disagree provide an argument as to why it was stupid, i.e. unintelligent - or the connotations you may have used here: pointless, incorrect etc. Any way, they are all wrong and I can completely deny them with relative ease. But like I said, care to justify yourself, or are you going to squirm your way out this mistake as well as all the rest? Third paragraph: You repeated what you said in the first line which I already covered, and you actually contradicted yourself again saying I show my intelligence (which I clearly do anyway) then saying everything i said was stupid earlier. Thank you come again. InfiniteRyvius said: Did Auto tell someone that they were being pretentious because they were using needlessly complicated words? Hey, you're living in the past, sonny boy. Clear and concise is the Autocratic way of now. Or did you miss something? Your post could have been shorter: I'll take that as a compliment. Don't judge me because you don't know me. And a forum is a place for people to exchange ideas anyway. 1. Don't say you used it correctly and then say you might have used it wrong. It's just trying to save face. 2. You didn't prove my post was stupid. 3. Refer to number one. Kthnkbai. Yup. Clear and concise alright. Obviously Nicole won't grasp everything if I just said it like that. -_- Plus you didn't really cover everything and it wasn't clear at all the way you said it, concise, maybe. I took out anything that said the same thing twice or was backpeddling or disregarded itself. Or wasn't substantive to intellectual discourse. MellowJello said: I feel bad for people getting harassed by TheAutocrat. So much that it reminded me to dig this up. Immahnoob said: Guide to know what Autocrat will say next: Did he talk about his political views/gave his opinions on the life he didnt live yet/etc? - No - Just wait a few more posts. - Yes - Did you disagree with his conspiracy theories/views/etc? - No - He will probably befriend you or compliment you. - Yes - Good, how did you disagree? - By saying his views are conspiracies and make no sense (ambiguous), derail, etc - You will get the "You have no insight", "You will see, I will become something in the future.", "You cannot grasp reality!". 2) Did you respond to his bullshit again? - No - He will leave the thread probably, if he gets ignored he'll feel omnipotent enough to leave you alone and he'll think he won. - Yes - He will probably start bending logic to his will and situation and will call you (in no specific order) - hypocrite, arrogant, deluded, pretentious, blind, obnoxious, unwise and will use other ad hominem too. Be prepared, because most of these he'll use them in the same post. 3) So, you're still continuing this? No - Good Lord! Leave the thread faster, you're going to be okay, no need for medical care I guess. He'll think he won though, so next time you talk to him be prepared to get attacked again. Yes - How did you respond? - I argued normally - Go back to 2). - I called the immense amount of fallacies - "You do not know in what context fallacies must be used, you use logic only when you want to and have no points, I won." 4) You want me to give you more?! Fine... So, how did you argue the fallacy part? - I've told him that he does not understand that committing to logic in arguments and not anywhere else is just normal - He'll probably tell you you're wrong, he's starting to slip around here. Around here he'll start saying he "won". - I've told him what fallacies are - He'll start slipping and most likely insult you in some way. Around here he'll start saying he "won". 5) ??? There's nothing more to say, to be honest, I've only got this far only once... It will repeat if you don't stop at 4). But he'll slip a lot, have fun. Meh. Simplicity is only option against the verbose. |
Apr 5, 2013 2:31 PM
#155
It saddens me how accurate that quote from Immahnoob is. |
Apr 5, 2013 2:37 PM
#156
Nicole said: Defending yourself is not saying "I just don't care". If I was defending myself, I'd actually defend myself. My posting here isn't defending myself. Oh, an attempt of a syllogism, goodie! (You ignored my points and questions again, but oh well, it seems logic does not apply to you) Anyway, in other words: If I was defending myself I wouldn't have said I just don't care. (You said you didn't care later on, obviously trying to weasel yourself out of this situation.) If I was defending myself you would know all about it. ( LOL) Or: I have not been defending myself because I haven't displayed that action. (If what you have been doing isn't defending yourself then what is it?) Ambiguous statement. Fallacy. My posting here isn't defending myself. (Well at least you stated the conclusion clearly, the first premise was unclear and could have been said simpler, and the second premise committed the ambiguous fallacy.) Invalid argument, only because of your second premise though. You get away with the first one which was unclear and not said in simple words. So according to this I highly doubt "I'd know all about it from you". From everything you have displayed here tonight, I deduce you have a low IQ. (Though I induced that a while ago) InfiniteRyvius said: I hate to point this out, but the word "inherently" was entirely appropriate, and Nicole used it in the correct way. Second, whilst you are more concise and clear, you are still far from what you could be. Third, even if you were better now, it just makes me laugh after you so strongly tried to refute me when I told you you were being pretentious by using long words before. I'm not saying her word choice was invalid, I'm saying she ignored the consequences of saying that word in said context. Clearly unable to justify herself. It also serves to be deceptive as people may believe and agree with her shallow words. She obviously used it to sound smart if she couldn't justify herself, at least, it serves that purpose in effect. Yeah, obviously I'll keep improving. My concision and clarity are close enough to the apex as need be just now. Strongly tried to refute you? What my half-assed statement in reply to your comment, really? lol Obviously I was being showy before, not pretentious as I wasn't trying to show more ability than I posses, as I have now shown I do posses that ability. That was just Mal's false inference. |
TheOttocratApr 5, 2013 2:42 PM
Apr 5, 2013 2:41 PM
#158
TheAutocrat said: From everything, I deduce you have a low IQ. You seem to be the type of person who enjoys looking down upon people and trying to make them feel bad, not particularly sure why you enjoy that sort of thing. However, I'd just like to say that you're really wasting your time here, there isn't really anything you could say that could make me feel bad. |
"If you love someone Follow your heart Cause love comes once If you’re lucky enough" |
Apr 5, 2013 2:55 PM
#159
Nicole said: TheAutocrat said: From everything, I deduce you have a low IQ. You seem to be the type of person who enjoys looking down upon people and trying to make them feel bad, not particularly sure why you enjoy that sort of thing. However, I'd just like to say that you're really wasting your time here, there isn't really anything you could say that could make me feel bad. Calm down, lol. I'm not trying to make you feel bad, I'm merely retorting and stating the facts. You're one of those people who convince themselves of something, in effect lie to themselves and don't stay true to their feelings. Otherwise why would have said something so random, and absurd like that? It was one hell of a baseless assertion. You're probably not aware of it, but deep down, sub consciously, you feel bad. I don't enjoy looking down on people. Actually you said "seem" which kind of helps you out with what I just said before, there. But then you say "I'm not sure why you enjoy that sort of thing" Like you take it for a given, this isn't the first time you've done that tonight. You know very little about me, so please stop making careless prejudgment like "I like to look down on people" Many people in real life know I do not look down on people nor enjoy it. I simply act when necessary. |
Apr 5, 2013 2:56 PM
#160
Would you say you are not being judgemental right now? |
Apr 5, 2013 2:58 PM
#161
TheAutocrat said: Nicole said: TheAutocrat said: From everything, I deduce you have a low IQ. You seem to be the type of person who enjoys looking down upon people and trying to make them feel bad, not particularly sure why you enjoy that sort of thing. However, I'd just like to say that you're really wasting your time here, there isn't really anything you could say that could make me feel bad. Calm down, lol. I'm not trying to make you feel bad, I'm merely retorting and stating the facts. You're one of those people who convince themselves of something, in effect lie to themselves and don't stay true to their feelings. Otherwise why would have said something so random, and absurd like that? It was one hell of a baseless assertion. You're probably not aware of it, but deep down, sub consciously, you feel bad. I don't enjoy looking down on people. Actually you said "seem" which kind of helps you out with what I just said before, there. But then you say "I'm not sure why you enjoy that sort of thing" Like you take it for a given, this isn't the first time you've done that tonight. You know very little about me, so please stop making careless prejudgment like "I like to look down on people" Many people in real life know I do not look down on people nor enjoy it. I simply act when necessary. It really does amuses me a lot when you say things like "You know very little about me". |
"If you love someone Follow your heart Cause love comes once If you’re lucky enough" |
Apr 5, 2013 2:58 PM
#162
TheAutocrat said: I lol'dYou know very little about me, so please stop making careless prejudgment Aww, double ninja'd... |
Apr 5, 2013 2:59 PM
#163
Wow this thread escalated. thee irony that is this topic is to great.......... apparently some people didnt get the memo yet. |
Apr 5, 2013 2:59 PM
#164
Maybe this entire thread was just a conspiracy to flame more hate. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:00 PM
#165
TheAutocrat said: You know very little about me >Implying there's anything about you to know. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:01 PM
#166
Karpman said: Would you say you are not being judgemental right now? Obviously I'm judging her, I'm making a logical deduction. For what reason do you ask, Karpman? TookMe6Years said: TheAutocrat said: You know very little about me, so please stop making careless prejudgment like "I like to look down on people" Many people in real life know I do not look down on people nor enjoy it. I simply act when necessary. Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Go re-read (read?) my post which talked about MAL being argumentative by nature and why I argue on here, from that you can gather that MAL only shows a partial side of people. That goes triply for the rest of you that lol'ed. Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! -_- |
Apr 5, 2013 3:02 PM
#167
k0k0 said: nah it just when you get to people who seem very opinionated they will just bump heads nothing can be done about it.Maybe this entire thread was just a conspiracy to flame more hate. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:02 PM
#168
Akito_Kinomoto said: TheAutocrat said: You know very little about me >Implying there's anything about you to know. Oh you cheeky boy, you. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:04 PM
#169
TheAutocrat said: I'm not saying her word choice was invalid, I'm saying she ignored the consequences of saying that word in said context. Clearly unable to justify herself. It also serves to be deceptive as people may believe and agree with her shallow words. She obviously used it to sound smart if she couldn't justify herself, at least, it serves that purpose in effect. Yeah, obviously I'll keep improving. My concision and clarity are close enough to the apex as need be just now. Strongly tried to refute you? What my half-assed statement in reply to your comment, really? lol Obviously I was being showy before, not pretentious as I wasn't trying to show more ability than I posses, as I have now shown I do posses that ability. That was just Mal's false inference. "Inherently" isn't even a high level word. I doubt there is a single person who doesn't know what it means here, unless perhaps the have english as a second language. Half assed you say? TheAutocrat said: Secondly, I'd like to talk about verbosity and ignorance. You may have picked up the misconception that I cannot use words properly . This is stemmed from the ambiguous nature of my text and also perhaps from when I spoke of my ignorance and "brief," scans of research material. I can however use my large vocabulary efficiently. I check my words through before using them in context. Of the redundant words, I had to integrate words into my writing when more precise terms would suffice. I am no master of rhetoric and english as I am now. You seek to perceive my words meaning through knowledge, not context. You think that because high context words have collective definition that they should be used more precisely. I made my text ambiguous so it increases in interpretation value and consequently discussion value. I do assign a few different meanings and interpretations to my words, so it is worth scrutinising. Words hold connotation in context. My words hold ambiguation and consequently many interpretations. The point is just as much to convey truths as it is to encourage thought. Ambiguosity entails that. and TheAutocrat said: Verbosity seeks to put a name on everything, every possible idea or perception. Without a name isn't an idea just a naked notion? It may even cease to be a unique idea and may then fall into someone elses idea through lack of precision. Verbosity is just like how one may not see how to solve in front of him without spectacles to aid him. The idea that verbosity equals pretentioussness is strictly governed, for people hold the fallacy that verbosity equals intelligence. Tell me Auto, are you a liar or do you simply have a selective memory? You are being an incredibly hypocrite in your argument against Nicole, and apart from anything else, you show that despite what you make sure to say over and over, you have changed very little since you had that argument with me half a year ago. Oh granted, you are slightly more concise and clear, however I'm sure that anyone could identify a post from you by it's rambling style, with heavy emphasis on buzz words. I don't care anymore if you continue to post in the way you do, I suspect that you simply cannot help yourself, but please stop making an insult of yourself and everyone else by insulting others of things you are far more guilty of. It's a great pity that you seem too stubborn to listen to people and change significantly, you only change superficially and yet you convince yourself it's something more. However I digress, maybe you are perfectly content in forever remaining in your current state. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:07 PM
#171
TheAutocrat said: Akito_Kinomoto said: TheAutocrat said: You know very little about me >Implying there's anything about you to know. Oh you cheeky boy, you. Snark is my master class. By the way, this is how you act arrogant. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:08 PM
#173
Oh my.... |
Apr 5, 2013 3:11 PM
#176
Hederick said: Kimura said: Autocrat pls go |
Apr 5, 2013 3:11 PM
#177
There's no point arguing with him, he has the social skills of an autistic chimpanzee and he thinks he's God's gift to mankind. Just nod your head till he goes away |
Apr 5, 2013 3:13 PM
#178
RandomPerson3 said: Hederick said: Kimura said: Autocrat pls go |
Apr 5, 2013 3:14 PM
#179
KentoBento said: RandomPerson3 said: Hederick said: Kimura said: Autocrat pls go |
Apr 5, 2013 3:15 PM
#180
Why has this gone from a semi-logical discussion to a flame war? Irony. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:15 PM
#181
Akito_Kinomoto said: KentoBento said: RandomPerson3 said: Hederick said: Kimura said: Autocrat pls go |
Apr 5, 2013 3:15 PM
#182
TheAutocrat said: You should just drop your personality and gain a bit of modesty and humility, there's your answer. :) How is this even possible, how can you expect a person to change suddenly someone they are not, why would Nicole have to change, because you want her to? TheAutocrat said: It's highly obnoxious and a major turn-off fyi, And for your information, this is an anime forum, not a dating site. TheAutocrat said: When you start throwing around the word inherently you damn better be ready to justify yourself, girl. It is a word for Christ's sake, if you seriously started an argument because of that just give a dictionary definition. If you are going to this, at least quote every hundred people a day as well when they misuse a word, while in this case, it might not have been misused. TheAutocrat said: I'm not "always" looking for an argument, that is a prejudgment as you are basically saying Saying someone is looking for a fight or argument is not a judgement, it is a simple perception. TheAutocrat said: This is a forum, MAL to be specific, and is argumentative by nature. People discuss by nature, and once every two people you come along you seem to find someone you do not agree with and you argue with them. Most people have the goal to socialise and to talk about shows, they do not necessarily want to defend their opinion. TheAutocrat said: You do not have information about me in neutral, or irl environments thus your argument is invalid. Vice versa, you made judgements about Nicole, but because you made them it is ok. Completely wrong. You can't judge a person until you have either heard them or seen them. I could go on and on and on. But I guess you get my point, everyone makes mistakes, and nobody likes getting pointed out for them. And you are being awfully childish judging someone over the internet and trying to degrade, again, over the internet. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:16 PM
#183
Hydnlife said: k0k0 said: nah it just when you get to people who seem very opinionated they will just bump heads nothing can be done about it.Maybe this entire thread was just a conspiracy to flame more hate. True that. They wouldn't do the same in real life. Internet really will be the downfall of the global society, tsk. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:17 PM
#184
Autocrat ignored my last post directed at him. I will take that to mean he has forfeited. |
كنت تهدر وقتك عن طريق ترجمة هذه. mattbenz99 said: Christians and Satanists are technically the same thing |
Apr 5, 2013 3:20 PM
#187
Goryo said: Maybe the pls go quote chain workedAutocrat ignored my last post directed at him. I will take that to mean he has forfeited. |
You've come a long way, baby. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:22 PM
#188
Welp I am going to delete my quotes. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:24 PM
#189
k0k0 said: Well SaidHydnlife said: k0k0 said: nah it just when you get to people who seem very opinionated they will just bump heads nothing can be done about it.Maybe this entire thread was just a conspiracy to flame more hate. True that. They wouldn't do the same in real life. Internet really will be the downfall of the global society, tsk. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:34 PM
#190
InfiniteRyvius said: TheAutocrat said: I'm not saying her word choice was invalid, I'm saying she ignored the consequences of saying that word in said context. Clearly unable to justify herself. It also serves to be deceptive as people may believe and agree with her shallow words. She obviously used it to sound smart if she couldn't justify herself, at least, it serves that purpose in effect. Yeah, obviously I'll keep improving. My concision and clarity are close enough to the apex as need be just now. Strongly tried to refute you? What my half-assed statement in reply to your comment, really? lol Obviously I was being showy before, not pretentious as I wasn't trying to show more ability than I posses, as I have now shown I do posses that ability. That was just Mal's false inference. "Inherently" isn't even a high level word. I doubt there is a single person who doesn't know what it means here, unless perhaps the have english as a second language. Half assed you say? TheAutocrat said: Secondly, I'd like to talk about verbosity and ignorance. You may have picked up the misconception that I cannot use words properly . This is stemmed from the ambiguous nature of my text and also perhaps from when I spoke of my ignorance and "brief," scans of research material. I can however use my large vocabulary efficiently. I check my words through before using them in context. Of the redundant words, I had to integrate words into my writing when more precise terms would suffice. I am no master of rhetoric and english as I am now. You seek to perceive my words meaning through knowledge, not context. You think that because high context words have collective definition that they should be used more precisely. I made my text ambiguous so it increases in interpretation value and consequently discussion value. I do assign a few different meanings and interpretations to my words, so it is worth scrutinising. Words hold connotation in context. My words hold ambiguation and consequently many interpretations. The point is just as much to convey truths as it is to encourage thought. Ambiguosity entails that. and TheAutocrat said: Verbosity seeks to put a name on everything, every possible idea or perception. Without a name isn't an idea just a naked notion? It may even cease to be a unique idea and may then fall into someone elses idea through lack of precision. Verbosity is just like how one may not see how to solve in front of him without spectacles to aid him. The idea that verbosity equals pretentioussness is strictly governed, for people hold the fallacy that verbosity equals intelligence. Tell me Auto, are you a liar or do you simply have a selective memory? You are being an incredibly hypocrite in your argument against Nicole, and apart from anything else, you show that despite what you make sure to say over and over, you have changed very little since you had that argument with me half a year ago. Oh granted, you are slightly more concise and clear, however I'm sure that anyone could identify a post from you by it's rambling style, with heavy emphasis on buzz words. I don't care anymore if you continue to post in the way you do, I suspect that you simply cannot help yourself, but please stop making an insult of yourself and everyone else by insulting others of things you are far more guilty of. It's a great pity that you seem too stubborn to listen to people and change significantly, you only change superficially and yet you convince yourself it's something more. However I digress, maybe you are perfectly content in forever remaining in your current state. "Well it took you a while but it seems you conjured something..." Was how I was going to start, but LOLOLOLOL, that was the most ridiculous excuse for an argument I have ever heard, haha! Firstly, I made it clear that I was talking about my reply to your comment in this thread. How the hell am I meant to know you were talking about those other posts from umpteen years ago, you know, back in the day, when I was still a boy? Anyway you clarity was questionable at best here. So no, I'm not a liar and I don't have selective memory, that was highly disappointing, Ryvius. You know I really expected much better, but why the hell are you lowering yourself so much, why are you making it so easy for me to tear you apart here? Why bother? Why get involved? What is your problem? The rest you just basically lied: "Auto, you are a hypocrite, I cannot justify myself, what you wanna fight about it? You've relevantly said a few times that you have changed which you clearly have, okay, you got me, I was being deceptive. Since that argument from a year ago which I pride myself in being superior to someone who was not in his best form, you have actually shown remarkable logic and ability in this thread, but admitting such would hurt my pride. Granted, you are clear and concise, nothing like that ill buffoon from a year ago (6 months ago or <?). However anyone could see that you use the minimum amount of words necessary and use them very accurately, I still like to associate the notion of you being "pretentious" whenever I see a 'big word'. You emphasize the point and state it clearly *blushes* oh god I'm in love, wait did I just say that out loud *gasps*. I don't really care if you continue to post like a normal astute human being, I suspect you simply cannot help yourself, well, you wouldn't want to post like a dumb-stupid person, but please stop telling others their qualities to help them and, state the facts and remain logical, since you were once guilty of such qualities, so you can't do that, kay! And even if you still possessed those qualities you still couldn't! It's a glorious day that you have proven how much you have learned from all the people here, I appreciate that post of yours which thanked them, you have shown me that you are indeed capable, dates? *cough* However I digress, maybe you are content in remaining in your current single state. ;)" I have made no mistakes in this thread, you certainly won't be fooling me. This is tedious and pointless now. It's obvious none of you have anything left to argue. All I see is a bunch of butt-hurt sheep, a seemingly groundlessly disgusted Ryviyus, and a bunch of people who would actually like to see the topic "get back on topic". -_______- Edit: Karpman and Goryo, I'll get back to you on profiles. |
TheOttocratApr 5, 2013 4:05 PM
Apr 5, 2013 3:36 PM
#191
"Everyone is wrong except me." |
"If you love someone Follow your heart Cause love comes once If you’re lucky enough" |
Apr 5, 2013 3:56 PM
#192
Alexx_ said: Akito_Kinomoto said: KentoBento said: RandomPerson3 said: Hederick said: Kimura said: Autocrat pls go |
You've come a long way, baby. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:58 PM
#193
My my, if there's anything I learned today: never use the word inherently here. |
Just this once, I'll fulfill whatever your wish is. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:59 PM
#194
Tavor said: No shit :PMy my, if there's anything I learned today: never use the word inherently here. |
Apr 5, 2013 3:59 PM
#195
Tavor said: My my, if there's anything I learned today: never use the word inherently here. Oooh babyyy, I will never say never...! |
Apr 5, 2013 4:00 PM
#196
Did this thread just go full retard? |
sexual incest in nisomonogatari - no one bats an eye romance incest in SAO - everyone loses their minds |
Apr 5, 2013 4:01 PM
#197
Ghostony said: Did this thread just go full retard? What do you mean with "just". |
Apr 5, 2013 4:03 PM
#198
Ghostony said: Did this thread just go full retard? Depends on your definition of retard, and whether or not you used the word correctly by the standard of Autocrats definition. |
كنت تهدر وقتك عن طريق ترجمة هذه. mattbenz99 said: Christians and Satanists are technically the same thing |
Apr 5, 2013 4:04 PM
#199
RandomPerson3 said: This thread is inherently retarded.Ghostony said: Did this thread just go full retard? What do you mean with "just". |
My subjective reviews: katsureview.wordpress.com THE CHAT CLUB. |
Apr 5, 2013 4:09 PM
#200
TheAutocrat said: "Well it took you a while but it seems you conjured something..." Was how I was going to start, but LOLOLOLOL, that was the most ridiculous excuse for an argument I have ever heard, haha! Firstly, I made it clear that I was talking about my reply to your comment in this thread. How the hell am I meant to know you were talking about those other posts from umpteen years ago, you know, back in the day, when I was still a boy? Anyway you clarity was questionable at best here. So no, I'm not a liar and I don't have selective memory, that was highly disappointing, Ryvius. You know I really expected much better, but why the hell are you lowering yourself so much, why are you making it so easy for me to tear you apart here? Why bother? Why get involved? What is your problem? The rest you just basically lied: "Auto, you are a hypocrite, I cannot justify myself, what you wanna fight about it? You've relevantly said a few times that you have changed which you clearly have, okay, you got me, I was being deceptive. Since that argument from a year ago which I pride myself in being superior to someone who was not in his best form, you have actually shown remarkable logic and ability in this thread, but admitting such would hurt my pride. Granted, you are clear and concise, nothing like that ill buffoon from a year ago (6 months ago or <?). However anyone could see that you use the minimum amount of words necessary and use them very accurately, I still like to associate the notion of you being "pretentious" whenever I see a 'big word'. You emphasize the point and state it clearly *blushes* oh god I'm in love, wait did I just say that out loud *gasps*. I don't really care if you continue to post like a normal astute human being, I suspect you simply cannot help yourself, well, you wouldn't want to post like a dumb-stupid person, but please stop telling others their qualities to help them and, state the facts and remain logical, since you were once guilty of such qualities, so you can't do that, kay! And even if you still possessed those qualities you still couldn't! It's a glorious day that you have proven how much you have learned from all the people here, I appreciate that post of yours which thanked them, you have shown me that you are indeed capable, dates? *cough* However I digress, maybe you are content in remaining in your current single state. ;)" I have made no mistakes in this thread, you certainly won't be fooling me. This is tedious and pointless now. It's obvious none of you have anything left to argue. All I see is a bunch of butt-hurt sheep, a seemingly groundlessly disgusted Ryvius, and a bunch of people who would actually like to see the topic "get back on topic". -_______- Edit: Karpman, I'll get back to you on profiles. Actually, everything here is on topic, how is it not? We've seen an apt demonstration of hate aimed at you. Of course, I imagine you feel this is thoroughly undeserved. My heart goes out to you. In any case, you clearly said it did you? Sorry, I got confused by your clear reference. It was clear, yet I somehow misinterpreted it. Still it sounds a bit of an overstatement to say that it's the most ridiculous excuse for an argument you've ever read, least of all because I wasn't even making an argument. However this at least confirms my suspicion that you never proof read. Auto, you were still a boy half a year ago? I recall at the time you said you had improved rapidly in the past 6 months up to that time. Auto, if you've been improving so dramatically all this time, then how come you're still so behind the curve? Was the amount to catch up too much? Why am I getting involved? It's because despite myself I don't want to see you make an enemy of absolutely everyone so that a quote chain of "pls leave Auto" can arise. Tell me Auto, does this happen to anyone else? Can you see it happening to anyone else? The answer to both is no, and the fact you have earned so much hate is inescapable. Auto, do you think I'm lying? You think that I honestly believe you have actually changed significantly? That's just twisted, so caught up are you in you self belief that you outright reject in thoughts of others. "There's no way he could actually think I haven't changed" you must have thought. That is laughable, and incredibly sad. You do not understand others at all, the line I mentioned previously and this "you have actually shown remarkable logic and ability in this thread, but admitting such would hurt my pride" shows how stuck in your fantasy you are, in which everyone appreciates and knows you for the intelligent individual that you are. I'm sorry to break this to you Auto, but this just isn't true. I have honestly complimented you before you though, and I am not so full of pride that I wouldn't so say again. The argument you made concerning words is a more clear and concise version of what you said in my quotes of you 6 moths ago (well done on that btw), I've already addressed that. Me in TheAutocrat's head said: *blushes* oh god I'm in love, wait did I just say that out loud *gasps*. I feel so privileged to occupy such a prominent spot in Auto's fantasies, even if I've been twisted out of recognition. |
InfiniteApr 5, 2013 4:14 PM
More topics from this board
» are nukes are the reason ww3 didn't started?Cielord - Yesterday |
23 |
by Gator
»»
1 minute ago |
|
Poll: » Soft Cats or Furry Cats?KittenCuddler - 7 hours ago |
13 |
by Loyal_Sheepling
»»
46 minutes ago |
|
» What are the benefits of using 7 feet RotavatorMahirakaur - 4 hours ago |
1 |
by Zettaiken
»»
2 hours ago |
|
» When did you first experience heartbreak in a romantic sense?MeanMrMusician - Jun 4 |
16 |
by Mayahuel
»»
3 hours ago |
|
» Is hating on Japan cool on the internet? ( 1 2 )Ahegyao - Apr 16, 2020 |
93 |
by Zarutaku
»»
3 hours ago |