New
Dec 8, 6:48 AM
#1
| A thread inspired by a post I saw elsewhere on the internet about a mother with children who hid a jar of peanut butter in her purse, and how the person who witnessed it was later told they were immoral for not stopping her when they told the events to someone else. Would you agree with that? Do you think the right thing to do would be to actually snitch? Personally, I wouldn't do it and wouldn't care if someone called me immoral for such a thing. |
Dec 8, 7:04 AM
#2
| It will depend on the details of the circumstance. In general, the harms of normalized shoplifting for the society is greatly understated because often only the immediately present consequences are considered. It's not just "Oh who cares, they have insurance for inventory discrepancies." It also contributes to the undermining of social trust, and living in a low trust society sucks big time. It adds friction and an extra transaction cost to every facet of society, in the form of more surveillance, more security personnel, more items behind plexiglass, more entitlement fraud investigations, more fare-dodging, more ethnic fractionalization and division, less unsupervised playtime for your children, worse safety perceptions etc. There's very broad agreement by economists that social trust is important for economic growth, and cross country studies also corroborate it. I would probably overlook it because I am not one for confrontations and also it is not of personal cost to me (a better person than me would intervene in the typical case), but it is symptom of a deteriorating condition. |
AuronDec 8, 7:17 AM
Dec 8, 7:35 AM
#3
| This is such an obvious honeypot/bait thread. I'm surprised anyone is replying to it. |
Dec 8, 7:45 AM
#4
| Stealing groceries isn't a serious enough crime, so I would ignore it. |
*kappa* |
Dec 8, 7:47 AM
#5
| no im not that moralist enough or even deontologist besides i do wish society should focus on catching big fish criminals instead poverty is the mother of crime so its a sign of a failing society or government anyway |
Dec 8, 7:50 AM
#6
deg said: besides i do wish society should focus on catching big fish criminals instead Society does for the most part focus on catching big fish criminals though! If you check perceptions of safety in Europe, it doesn't actually correlate with changes in felonies like homicide, in the last decades where Germany has seen a reduction in homicide rates, perceptions of safety has lowered substantially as well. It looks paradoxical at first, but it isn't when you think about it. Perceptions of safety in Europe does not track homicide rates, those are really rare to begin with, it tracks the changes in petty crimes that are a lot more prevalent, because that's the type of crimes that the average person is a lot more likely to encounter and color their perception. |
AuronDec 8, 7:55 AM
Dec 8, 7:52 AM
#7
Reply to Auron
deg said:
besides i do wish society should focus on catching big fish criminals instead
besides i do wish society should focus on catching big fish criminals instead
Society does for the most part focus on catching big fish criminals though! If you check perceptions of safety in Europe, it doesn't actually correlate with changes in felonies like homicide, in the last decades where Germany has seen a reduction in homicide rates, perceptions of safety has lowered substantially as well. It looks paradoxical at first, but it isn't when you think about it. Perceptions of safety in Europe does not track homicide rates, those are really rare to begin with, it tracks the changes in petty crimes that are a lot more prevalent, because that's the type of crimes that the average person is a lot more likely to encounter and color their perception.
| @Auron not here in the philippines at least but ye this country is a poor country anyway where there is more corruption and crimes heck i will start having hope here when they repeal the bank secrecy law and pass the freedom of information law already for more government transparency but ye to me europe is different its one of the best governed places on earth and still its citizens are constantly complaining |
degDec 8, 8:35 AM
Dec 8, 7:57 AM
#8
| No. I know she/he wouldn't have the chance to get out of the supermarket without paying for it. |
Dec 8, 9:14 AM
#9
| If people believe that moral is objective, they become stiff and fanatical. They lose common sense, and the ability to use the intuition, the gut feeling, and their understanding to judge each situation individually according to the circumstances. They believe that the circumstances don't matter, and that if something's wrong it's always wrong and period. Personally I say BULLSHIT (with all due respect). I do not even remotely believe that there is such a thing as an objective moral. Everything depends on the circumstances. If I see a shady person harassing a child, even if I do not know the whole story (= maybe the child did something horrible), I intervene. If I see a hungry person stealing food, I don't intervene, because anybody with enough intelligence and common sense can see that modern society CAUSES poverty. A poor person cornered to the point of having to steal in order to survive, is not the cause but the effect of the problem. The cause is the economic system where few rich people take more part of the cake, and lot of poor people have to share what's left. And with time it becomes even worse, because modern economic system (aka capitalism) is like a Ponzi scheme or a Pyramid scheme, it needs constant population growth to keep going. More people means more resources consumption, = with time you have even more people who have to share even less resources, while a few super rich take most of the cake for themselves. How the fuck this is even legal is something that baffles me deeply. As it also baffles me how so few people seem aware of what kind of dystopian future we'll inevitably cause if we keep going in this direction. Not that there are many chances to stop that future anymore. That's why all the techno-plutocrats (the ones who more than anybody else are causing that future) are building luxury fortresses. Or you didn't know? Saying that the food thief is causing harm to society is a very narrow vision of things. The food thief is taking back the part of the cake that's rightfully theirs. Rather than saying that not ratting on the thief is morally wrong, I'd say that ratting on them while supporting an economic system that forces them to steal to survive is what's REALLY wrong, as also incredibly narrowminded. |
Dec 8, 9:19 AM
#10
| I wouldn't snitch. I don't like to interfere in people's lives. |
| Somebody kiss Potato. D:< |
Dec 8, 9:32 AM
#11
| No, I wouldn't. I'm definitely not gonna be on the side of rich companies. If someone steals food, they are probably only doing it because they have no other choice. |
We should not be upset that others hide the truth from us, when we hide it so often from ourselves. |
Dec 8, 9:34 AM
#12
Reply to Auron
It will depend on the details of the circumstance. In general, the harms of normalized shoplifting for the society is greatly understated because often only the immediately present consequences are considered. It's not just "Oh who cares, they have insurance for inventory discrepancies." It also contributes to the undermining of social trust, and living in a low trust society sucks big time.
It adds friction and an extra transaction cost to every facet of society, in the form of more surveillance, more security personnel, more items behind plexiglass, more entitlement fraud investigations, more fare-dodging, more ethnic fractionalization and division, less unsupervised playtime for your children, worse safety perceptions etc. There's very broad agreement by economists that social trust is important for economic growth, and cross country studies also corroborate it.
I would probably overlook it because I am not one for confrontations and also it is not of personal cost to me (a better person than me would intervene in the typical case), but it is symptom of a deteriorating condition.
It adds friction and an extra transaction cost to every facet of society, in the form of more surveillance, more security personnel, more items behind plexiglass, more entitlement fraud investigations, more fare-dodging, more ethnic fractionalization and division, less unsupervised playtime for your children, worse safety perceptions etc. There's very broad agreement by economists that social trust is important for economic growth, and cross country studies also corroborate it.
I would probably overlook it because I am not one for confrontations and also it is not of personal cost to me (a better person than me would intervene in the typical case), but it is symptom of a deteriorating condition.
| @Auron Where I live, I'd say stealing food is not that common and is mostly done by teenagers (guilty as charged, I myself used to steal everything from candies to even alcohol), and a lot of stores won't let more than a few teenagers inside at a time, asking them to leave their backpacks at the registers. An adult (another customer) once caught me trying to steal a bottle of cider and she flipped at me, but in retrospect I can't say she was wrong (and I'd probably be that boring adult snitch now). But adults who actually steal food usually don't do it for the kick, they're just awfully poor. I understand that a high-trust society is desirable, but all that economic growth doesn't seem to help the lower class much anyway. It's all greedy corps rubbing their hands while the cost of living keeps rising. Not that I wish for people to steal, more that if they don't want people to steal, it is more than that efforts should be made to reduce inequalities... But if I were to witness someone hiding hundreds and hundreds of dollars worth of beef in a huge winter coat, then I might intervene (that's actually something that happened in my province and was everywhere in the news). |
Dec 8, 9:37 AM
#13
Reply to DesuMaiden
This is such an obvious honeypot/bait thread. I'm surprised anyone is replying to it.
| @DesuMaiden Honeypot? You expect me to go to every user's house that says they would ignore the thief and arrest them or something? |
Dec 8, 9:52 AM
#14
| i actually did once a few years ago. i was in this 24/7 store with my brother and mom at like 2 am just grabbing snacks. there were these guys messing around and clearly stealing stuff, so i just went and reported them. honestly it depends on the person. i don’t think i’d report an older person or most women, but if it is a bunch of young dudes doing it, yeah i am gonna report it. |
Dec 8, 9:53 AM
#15
| I wouldn't snitch on any crime unless is was something really heinous like murder/rape/kidnapping/aggravated battery or it involved a friend or family member. |
Dec 8, 9:56 AM
#16
| No, I’m not snitching. Not my circus, not my moral crusade. Corporations aren’t going to collapse over a jar of peanut butter, and I’m not about to play discount Batman over someone who’s probably desperate. And if someone wants to call me “immoral” for minding my own business? Cool. They can go polish their imaginary badge while I continue living in the real world. |
Dec 8, 9:59 AM
#17
Auron said: Trump has the approval of half the country That says a lot about the current state of the supposedly most advanced Country in the world. Imagine, half of it don't even have what it takes to realise the kind of person he is, or don't care about it. About the rigged system, no idea why you thought I meant the elections, I mentioned rich plutocrats and my previous message because I was referring to the globally dominant economical system, aka capitalism. That game is rigged from the start, calling Positive-Sum what's actually Zero-Sum because it depends on planetary resources and on perpetual population growth. EDIT: and I disagree that my example wasn't a counter to your claim. Most people would consider corrupt politicians and plutocrats and autocrats as the REAL big fish criminals. Violent crime is nothing in comparison to the crimes of these people, which shape (for the bad) the entire global dynamic, and accelerate the social, economical and ecological collapse of human society. |
no_eyes_sightDec 8, 10:06 AM
Dec 8, 10:17 AM
#18
| Eh, 9/10 chance they're gonna get caught anyway, so no. |
| If I had to choose between One Piece and a girlfriend...I think I'll go with One Piece |
Dec 8, 10:28 AM
#19
Impala said: And if someone wants to call me “immoral” for minding my own business? Cool. They can go polish their imaginary badge while I continue living in the real world. Yup. This is my concern. I like to mind my own business. It's not my job to report, unless I'm a cop or employee of the supermarket. *shrugs* |
| Somebody kiss Potato. D:< |
Dec 8, 10:54 AM
#20
fleurbleue said: But adults who actually steal food usually don't do it for the kick, they're just awfully poor I respect your viewpoint a lot of course, fleur, but that's not necessarily obvious to me. I think some portion of people are definitely desperate, but as to the portion I couldn't really say. I tried to look into it, and this survey[1] which categorized participants who reported shoplifting, put the plurality of them under Loss-Reactive Type (28%), people who have significant trauma/loss and compensate by shoplifting. The remaining types were: Impulsive Type (20%), Depressed Type (18%), Hobbyist Type (18%), Addictive–Compulsive Type (9%), Economically Disadvantaged Type (7%) The sample size is 202, so plugging that to the formula, you'd get an error margin of ±6.9% with a CI of 90%. [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31043101/ |
Dec 8, 11:26 AM
#21
| Ehh my friends steal from the local dollarama all the time, like i'm not one to steal, but i'm not one to report my own friend, getting police involved and stuff all over a $1 chocolate bar either... |
Dec 8, 11:45 AM
#22
| I wouldn't, but it's more about me not wanting to get involved than me thinking there's nothing wrong with stealing. They could get free food at a local food bank in my city. So there's no excuse to steal. It's wrong. It's not suddenly okay to steal just because it was from a business, no matter how big it is. They make society worse for the reasons @Auron gave above, and we also contribute to making society worse when we do apologetics for their behavior. If someone else wants to snitch on them, more power to them. |
Dec 8, 11:49 AM
#23
| Definitely snitching. My mom works at a supermarket and she got punched in the face by a guy she caught stealing. |
| MEA·MENTVLA·INGENS·EST |
Dec 8, 12:56 PM
#24
Reply to Auron
fleurbleue said:
But adults who actually steal food usually don't do it for the kick, they're just awfully poor
But adults who actually steal food usually don't do it for the kick, they're just awfully poor
I respect your viewpoint a lot of course, fleur, but that's not necessarily obvious to me. I think some portion of people are definitely desperate, but as to the portion I couldn't really say. I tried to look into it, and this survey[1] which categorized participants who reported shoplifting, put the plurality of them under Loss-Reactive Type (28%), people who have significant trauma/loss and compensate by shoplifting. The remaining types were:
Impulsive Type (20%), Depressed Type (18%), Hobbyist Type (18%), Addictive–Compulsive Type (9%), Economically Disadvantaged Type (7%)
The sample size is 202, so plugging that to the formula, you'd get an error margin of ±6.9% with a CI of 90%.
[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31043101/
| @Auron Those numbers surprise me but they are probably still right (even though I feel like questioning the methodology). All I can talk about is my own experience. Shoplifting was pretty much rampant in high school (and from what @waferish said, it looks like it still is) with everyone being pretty open about it. But it wasn't a thing anymore once we reached adulthood so I've always linked shoplifting more to immaturity than to psychological problems. I would have loved statistics on what different types of things people usually shoplift, but I'm probably asking too much. I wouldn't be surprised if kleptomaniacs usually steal small stuff that's easy to hide (and don't pay much attention to the price of what they take) while the "economically disadvantaged" go for the pricier stuff. The story doesn't say if it was a 1 kg or 2 kg jar, but a Kraft peanut butter jar isn't something that can be hidden that easily (and a 2 kg jar is almost 12 CAD$). |
fleurbleueDec 8, 2:16 PM
Dec 8, 4:35 PM
#25
| In the example you gave, I don't think I would say anything. I've witnessed teenagers shoplifting before and didn't involve myself, so what confidence do I have that I would here? I sure hope though that I have the courage to step in when it matters (even though I would argue it always does). I have always despised theft, and even more so vandalism, so their misery is my pleasure. |
Dec 8, 4:54 PM
#26
| No, I don't like snitches and I'm not planning to become one, simple as that. And honestly, your story about the poor mother with her kids really got to me. In a fit of seasonal generosity I'd probably buy them a bottle of vodka and a chocolate bar - let the kids enjoy something, Christmas is practically breathing down our necks. Funny side note: my son has a friend with a "von" in his last name - very promising young man, dreams of a political career, nearly became Schülersprecher this year (basically the student council head, a decent launchpad for future power grabs). Rumor has it he bought cargo pants with more pockets than principles a week before they introduced self-checkout at the Lidl next to the school. I'm genuinely impressed! Told my kid to cherish this connection - this gentleman is clearly destined for great heights, haha. |
| Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. |
Dec 8, 5:20 PM
#27
Reply to Kwanthemaster
In the example you gave, I don't think I would say anything. I've witnessed teenagers shoplifting before and didn't involve myself, so what confidence do I have that I would here? I sure hope though that I have the courage to step in when it matters (even though I would argue it always does). I have always despised theft, and even more so vandalism, so their misery is my pleasure.
Kwanthemaster said: What happened to compassion over gloating, that doesn't seem very Christian to me. ☹️their misery is my pleasure |
Dec 8, 5:21 PM
#28
Reply to LoveYourSmile
No, I don't like snitches and I'm not planning to become one, simple as that.
And honestly, your story about the poor mother with her kids really got to me. In a fit of seasonal generosity I'd probably buy them a bottle of vodka and a chocolate bar - let the kids enjoy something, Christmas is practically breathing down our necks.
Funny side note: my son has a friend with a "von" in his last name - very promising young man, dreams of a political career, nearly became Schülersprecher this year (basically the student council head, a decent launchpad for future power grabs). Rumor has it he bought cargo pants with more pockets than principles a week before they introduced self-checkout at the Lidl next to the school. I'm genuinely impressed! Told my kid to cherish this connection - this gentleman is clearly destined for great heights, haha.
And honestly, your story about the poor mother with her kids really got to me. In a fit of seasonal generosity I'd probably buy them a bottle of vodka and a chocolate bar - let the kids enjoy something, Christmas is practically breathing down our necks.
Funny side note: my son has a friend with a "von" in his last name - very promising young man, dreams of a political career, nearly became Schülersprecher this year (basically the student council head, a decent launchpad for future power grabs). Rumor has it he bought cargo pants with more pockets than principles a week before they introduced self-checkout at the Lidl next to the school. I'm genuinely impressed! Told my kid to cherish this connection - this gentleman is clearly destined for great heights, haha.
LoveYourSmile said: Hmmm... Weren't you the one who snitched on my thread about DesuMaiden like back in 2024? No, I don't like snitches and I'm not planning to become one, simple as that. |
Dec 8, 5:22 PM
#29
| Most times: no. Except, I dunno, they steal expensive unnecessary stuff like fine wine etc..., but even then I'd hesistate. I also paid for a woman once, because the employees caught her. |
Dec 8, 5:24 PM
#30
Reply to Auron
It will depend on the details of the circumstance. In general, the harms of normalized shoplifting for the society is greatly understated because often only the immediately present consequences are considered. It's not just "Oh who cares, they have insurance for inventory discrepancies." It also contributes to the undermining of social trust, and living in a low trust society sucks big time.
It adds friction and an extra transaction cost to every facet of society, in the form of more surveillance, more security personnel, more items behind plexiglass, more entitlement fraud investigations, more fare-dodging, more ethnic fractionalization and division, less unsupervised playtime for your children, worse safety perceptions etc. There's very broad agreement by economists that social trust is important for economic growth, and cross country studies also corroborate it.
I would probably overlook it because I am not one for confrontations and also it is not of personal cost to me (a better person than me would intervene in the typical case), but it is symptom of a deteriorating condition.
It adds friction and an extra transaction cost to every facet of society, in the form of more surveillance, more security personnel, more items behind plexiglass, more entitlement fraud investigations, more fare-dodging, more ethnic fractionalization and division, less unsupervised playtime for your children, worse safety perceptions etc. There's very broad agreement by economists that social trust is important for economic growth, and cross country studies also corroborate it.
I would probably overlook it because I am not one for confrontations and also it is not of personal cost to me (a better person than me would intervene in the typical case), but it is symptom of a deteriorating condition.
| @Auron As long as the ceos of supermarket chains earn millions, while others are so dirt poor, they have to steal basic food items, I don't give a shit. |
TressymDec 8, 5:28 PM
Dec 8, 5:25 PM
#31
Reply to fleurbleue
LoveYourSmile said:
No, I don't like snitches and I'm not planning to become one, simple as that.
Hmmm... Weren't you the one who snitched on my thread about DesuMaiden like back in 2024? No, I don't like snitches and I'm not planning to become one, simple as that.
| @fleurbleue I remember reporting one of your threads, true - not sure which one, though. So what? Happens, just uncommon. |
| Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. |
Dec 8, 5:35 PM
#32
Reply to LoveYourSmile
@fleurbleue I remember reporting one of your threads, true - not sure which one, though. So what? Happens, just uncommon.
| @LoveYourSmile It's alright, it's all in the past… Unless you're one of the killjoys who reported my Jesus thread, in which case I hope you stub your toe. |
Dec 8, 5:42 PM
#33
Reply to fleurbleue
@LoveYourSmile It's alright, it's all in the past… Unless you're one of the killjoys who reported my Jesus thread, in which case I hope you stub your toe.
| @fleurbleue What a Christian would I be if I crucified people for mocking Jesus? Thanks god my toe is safe this time. |
| Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. |
Dec 8, 5:48 PM
#34
Reply to fleurbleue
Kwanthemaster said:
their misery is my pleasure
What happened to compassion over gloating, that doesn't seem very Christian to me. ☹️their misery is my pleasure
| @fleurbleue It's right to desire justice, but I acknowledge my feelings can sometimes be cruel. Please do not conflate the two. Obviously human life is more valuable than property. But on a related note, when you see a human abusing an animal or the environment, doesn't it make you angry? You don't just want the evil to cease, you want it to cost. Now it gives me no pleasure to see a starving person beaten for trying to survive, but those who steal and destroy for fun? Let them feel the shame of their actions. |
Dec 8, 5:53 PM
#35
Reply to DesuMaiden
This is such an obvious honeypot/bait thread. I'm surprised anyone is replying to it.
| @DesuMaiden I find it surreal that you out of all people say this, |
Dec 8, 6:42 PM
#36
Reply to Kwanthemaster
@fleurbleue
It's right to desire justice, but I acknowledge my feelings can sometimes be cruel. Please do not conflate the two. Obviously human life is more valuable than property.
But on a related note, when you see a human abusing an animal or the environment, doesn't it make you angry? You don't just want the evil to cease, you want it to cost. Now it gives me no pleasure to see a starving person beaten for trying to survive, but those who steal and destroy for fun? Let them feel the shame of their actions.
It's right to desire justice, but I acknowledge my feelings can sometimes be cruel. Please do not conflate the two. Obviously human life is more valuable than property.
But on a related note, when you see a human abusing an animal or the environment, doesn't it make you angry? You don't just want the evil to cease, you want it to cost. Now it gives me no pleasure to see a starving person beaten for trying to survive, but those who steal and destroy for fun? Let them feel the shame of their actions.
| @Kwanthemaster Oh, I have nothing but hatred for people who abuse animals and wouldn't mind if they were to suffer immensely, but then again I'm not one to follow Christian precepts much. Don't forget I’m the one who was called immoral for months on end on these forums because I supported Luigi Mangione's actions. I was just kinda surprised at you saying something like taking pleasure in people's misery, since I knew you were quite pious. |
Dec 8, 7:07 PM
#37
| It's not the supermarket of my dad, idgaf what people steal and take here |
Dec 8, 7:18 PM
#38
Reply to fleurbleue
@Kwanthemaster Oh, I have nothing but hatred for people who abuse animals and wouldn't mind if they were to suffer immensely, but then again I'm not one to follow Christian precepts much. Don't forget I’m the one who was called immoral for months on end on these forums because I supported Luigi Mangione's actions. I was just kinda surprised at you saying something like taking pleasure in people's misery, since I knew you were quite pious.
| @fleurbleue I used strong words, and they didn't sit well with me, but I was getting riled up in the moment. I really don't want to see people be miserable, but seeing justice served can be enjoyable. We all love a bit of instant karma. Heart change is ultimately what we should desire though, where you do good because you genuinely want to, not out of the fear of consequence. |
Dec 8, 7:42 PM
#39
| It's not my jar of peanut butter, so i don't care. They shouldn't morally lecture me when I did nothing bad like blackmailing that peanut butter lady |
Dec 9, 12:42 AM
#40
| No, because I don't care enough and there's no benefit to me to do so. But I do think there's no reason to steal things. There's a billion ways to get free food - including food banks, most commonly. Or - if you live in a developed country - government support. |
Dec 9, 3:31 AM
#41
| Snitches get stitches, and end up in ditches. 🤐 |
_MazinoDec 9, 3:37 AM
Dec 9, 5:39 AM
#42
Tressym said: As long as the ceos of supermarket chains earn millions, while others are so dirt poor, they have to steal basic food items, I don't give a shit I already talked fairly at length about how the costs aren't limited to what's immediately evident. This is a self-reinforcing cycle, trust get worse when institutions don't reliably disincentivize defectors, and leads more people wondering why should they be the sucker playing by the books when others are pursuing narrow self-interest, leading to more defections, more noticing of defectors, rinse repeat. This is not the kind of trajectory we want to be on, one can check North and South Italy by most metrics to see the importance of institutional and social trust. As @fleurbleue suspected, and they were right according to the paper I linked, the economically disadvantaged shoplifters do not tend to steal basic food items to begin with, they tend to steal the relative more expensive items, compared to the other groups studied at any rate. The last cluster in the analyses comprised of 6.9% of the sample (14 individuals) and was marked by the lowest annual income and socioeconomic status. These individuals were all highly motivated by economic advantages associated with shoplifting and typically stole more expensive items (Mdn = US$10.00, M = US$22.93, SD = US$51.31) that they had the least ability to pay for, compared with other types, which suggests economic need. They engaged in the most sophisticated methods to aid in their shoplifting, such as a bag lined with foil to evade radio frequency scanners. Welcome back to the forums, by the way. |
AuronDec 9, 5:44 AM
Dec 9, 6:11 AM
#43
Reply to fleurbleue
@LoveYourSmile It's alright, it's all in the past… Unless you're one of the killjoys who reported my Jesus thread, in which case I hope you stub your toe.
| @fleurbleue Someone reported it? I thought mods actively check subforums and topics. Every time a thread gets locked, I die inside. |
| Somebody kiss Potato. D:< |
Dec 9, 6:44 AM
#44
Reply to thepotatoprince
@fleurbleue
Someone reported it?
I thought mods actively check subforums and topics.
Every time a thread gets locked, I die inside.
Someone reported it?
I thought mods actively check subforums and topics.
Every time a thread gets locked, I die inside.
| @thepotatoprince Apparently there was more than one snitch. Kinda funny that I have higher chances of getting reported for my threads than if I were to steal food right in people's faces. 🙃 |
Dec 9, 6:46 AM
#45
Reply to fleurbleue
@thepotatoprince Apparently there was more than one snitch. Kinda funny that I have higher chances of getting reported for my threads than if I were to steal food right in people's faces. 🙃
| @fleurbleue More than one?! It's probably not because of your threads. Maybe it's about a clash in the past. But then again, I'm not a psychologist. I'm just guessing. Unless there are users here who are a stickler for the rules, which is odd. |
| Somebody kiss Potato. D:< |
Dec 9, 6:47 AM
#46
| what about god? why they do not care? if so called god does not care then why should we? /s |
Dec 9, 7:13 AM
#47
Reply to thepotatoprince
@fleurbleue
More than one?!
It's probably not because of your threads. Maybe it's about a clash in the past.
But then again, I'm not a psychologist. I'm just guessing.
Unless there are users here who are a stickler for the rules, which is odd.
More than one?!
It's probably not because of your threads. Maybe it's about a clash in the past.
But then again, I'm not a psychologist. I'm just guessing.
Unless there are users here who are a stickler for the rules, which is odd.
| @thepotatoprince Well yeah, I wouldn't expect anyone to become a snitch if they liked me. I did clash with a number of weird individuals over the last year, from the holier-than-thou to your typical right-wingers, to someone who became bitter and hateful toward me after I didn't do much to reciprocate when they made really poor attempts to befriend me (I may still be kinda responsible for that one). |
Dec 9, 7:16 AM
#48
Reply to fleurbleue
@thepotatoprince Well yeah, I wouldn't expect anyone to become a snitch if they liked me. I did clash with a number of weird individuals over the last year, from the holier-than-thou to your typical right-wingers, to someone who became bitter and hateful toward me after I didn't do much to reciprocate when they made really poor attempts to befriend me (I may still be kinda responsible for that one).
| @fleurbleue That's a lot of suspects. I really like your threads. I don't like it when they got locked. |
| Somebody kiss Potato. D:< |
Dec 9, 8:59 AM
#49
| if it's something minor like a jar of peanut butter like in your example, I don't really care if it's those dudes that try to steal whole ass fish like I've heard from a friend then that's just excessive, like bruh |
Dec 9, 10:25 AM
#50
Thread cleaned. Removed posts that violate Casual Discussion Rules 7: Controversial/sensitive topics liable to incite rule violations (trolling, flaming, abuse) are no longer allowed. e.g. politics, political ideologies, laws, policies, controversial public figures/leaders. |
More topics from this board
» Would you be willing to share what your face looks like on MAL? ( 1 2 3 )Ejrodiew - Nov 7, 2024 |
120 |
by Shishio-kun
»»
6 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » How do you feel about "Using hot girls to sell things" type of marketing?TheBlockernator - Sep 20 |
29 |
by Hydre_Ito
»»
6 minutes ago |
|
» what's the darkest kid's movie you've seen?TheBlockernator - Yesterday |
14 |
by Dostojevskij
»»
1 hour ago |
|
» Have you accidentally glued your hands together when doing a craft project?_Sunny_Day - Nov 23, 2023 |
16 |
by Dostojevskij
»»
1 hour ago |
|
» Do you avoid certain thread makers ?GoonLyfeVes - Dec 6 |
31 |
by deg
»»
2 hours ago |