JOJO STEEL BALL RUN New Event and Trailer

what will be it's release pattern

I agree, even as a self-proclaimed relatively big jojo fan I don't know why there isn't much talk on why the animation looks a bit meh.

@WallnutWasTaken there is talk about it mostly outside of mal from what i can see, and the biggest excuse is that jojo's animation has always been mediocre. i think it's a lame excuse because i think some previous parts have looked really good, also it's not 2015 anymore so a 2025/26 anime should be looking a lot better.

doesn't really look that good, especially since this is one of the best parts. jojo has looked a lot better.

Yes, jojo's animation has always been average to above average, it was nothing spectacular like what you see in demon slayer of the fate movies.



No, that's not how anime works, passage of time doesn't always necessarily guarantee that the quality would improve, if anything it could get worse. there are many factors in play here like the studio in question, the skill of the animators, the budget of the anime, the use or non-use of cgi, the complexity of the art, backgrounds, coloring and texturing, the resolution of the render and effects and many many other factors. look at early 80s cel anime and compare it with early 2000s digital anime, there's a 20 year gap but quality nosedived. So no, time isn't the only factor to consider for quality to improve, whether it's 2015 or 2025 the same digital tools are being used by david pro mainly Cacani software, so expect the same results as all the other jojo anime from 2012 to 2022. Be it 2015 or 2025 the quality will stay the same given the use of the same tools.

@ryzxgum Be happy it doesn't look worse, just look at fist of the north star's new anime just to get a taste of how poor anime could be.

i wouldn't even want jojo to look like demon slayer. even if the animation wasn't the best, at least the art always looked good. now even the shape of their faces look off to the point the fans have been fixing it to look how it's meant to look.you're just mentioning everything that SHOULD improve, especially with the time that they had and the staff wasn't even the same as fire force's so what's the excuse? look at one piece and bleach, they've improved. and one piece is a weekly anime to boot.

First of all manga art doesn't always translate well to animation, that's why it's often simplified and modified to fit animation constraints. As for the shape of the face, it's hard to tell because araki's art changes so much and was never really consistent with proportions and face shapes just look at early valentine and late valentine.



I'm not saying it shouldn't improve, i'm saying it's not always the case that it improves due to numerous complex factors, but at the core of it is money, jojo does not make as much money as one piece and araki's artstyle is notoriously difficult to adapt that's why anime with simpler art styles often get better animation because they're easier to animate well and keep the proportions relatively consistent so they can focus on other aspects, though this could be easily fixed with higher budgets and more staff and more development time which is the case for anime movies but i don't think jojo is gonna have that luxury as a tv production, this seasons's animation will be similar to part 4/5.



You're viewing it from an idealistic point of view (what it should be), i'm viewing it from a realistic point of view (what it is), whether you like it or not SBR is getting animated this way because that's how things are and that's how the industry works, now whether it's good or bad is up to you to judge. i'm just stating the facts how they are presented, keep in mind David Pro is NOT Shaft they've never put as much money into animation and clean up. Just look at the many animation mistakes from the last 6 parts. https://jojocomparisons.github.io/jojo-diu-27/ It is what it is that's how life is sometimes.

@tchitchouan you can simplify it and still have it look good, that's what previous jojo has done. funny valentine isn't a good example, araki straight up completely changed him completely. if johnny went from fat to skinny, fair enough, but that isn't the case.like i said, simplifying and have it look good has been the general idea.you're the one trying to get me to be glad because it doesn't look like fist of the northstar and i'm the one idealistic? you've got your definitions mixed up. the realistic fact is that it doesn't look good, and comparing it to anything else doesn't give this a pass. showing past mistakes doesn't excuse the cuurent state of them either.

@ryzxgum Yes, i fully agree with your points. At the ends of the day it's a take it or leave thing, you can always not watch if you don't like it and think the quality is not up to your standards, But complaining isn't gonna change the quality or how the anime is gonna be made, though you're free to critique and criticize it all you want, it's not gonna improve or worsen it. Also i'm not giving it a pass, it does look bad, what i'm saying is that it could be far far worse.

@tchitchouan it can change though. even the latest sakamoto days improved it's animation for cour 2 after hearing all the complaints from cour 1. even if it doesn't change, it's a lot more sensible seeing people be sane instead of all the toxic positivity over it. and you were giving it a pass, in your wordsliterally telling me to be grateful over the bare minimum, which is the most idealistic thing you could've said.

@ryzxgum No, i don't think you understood my reasoning and line of logic, in my view the fact that they didn't go full CGI is already a good thing, i'm not a very demanding guy, The animation looks fine and serviceable, i'm not expecting shaft or madhouse level quality from david production. Also i said "be happy it doesn't look worse" as in being content not grateful which is a realistic outlook because things often go south real fast real bad. The idealistic thing for me to say is "This anime looks like ass, why isn't it animated better like some other parts" that's Idealism because it's projecting my thoughts and feeling on how i want it to be instead of what it is, which is exactly what you're doing.

A realistic person sees things as they are and deals with them in a practical way. An idealistic person has a notion or standard of perfection and aims to achieve that notion or standard even if it is highly unrealistic or impractical.

coughing baby vs coughing baby type moment. i don't see it being any worse if it were cgi.so you admittedly have low standards. earlier you said you're not giving it a pass but now you're saying the opposite, at least make up your mind. but if you do, then good for you but i don't wanna hear it because there's already enough toxic positivity in here to the point it's repulsive.it has gone south, this pv being released was the moment it happened. having expectations ≠ idealistic. it's only idealistic if it's unreasonable for it to look any better, but thinking that's impossible to be better when it has looked better is just forced incompetence. good, now reread this and plant it deep in your brain so you don't confuse it with reasonable expectations next time.