Alexioos95 said:Daicarus said:there is no such thing as "correct", it's just a human-made word that everyone interprets differently for themselves.[...] if you're interested in watching it chronologically
In the context of a story written by someone, the correct is how the author expected his story be experienced. You can decide to interpret and likes the story how you want, sure, but it does not transcend what the author intended (yeah, i'm against "La mort de l'auteur").
And why chronologically to begin with ? 99% of stories literally weren't made chronological on purpose, and untangling the timelines ruins the effects of most scenes. The concept of chronological order is already an heresy to writing by itself, especially when talking about complex stories.
Now, the problem there is that your "simple answer" is not respected by any of the people pushing the "chronological order". They want everyone to follow them and that's it, there is no reflexion behind it; that's why questionning their reasoning always leads to a blank, or at best, a pot full of flaws.
Oh, and there is no closed thread on MAL. It only happens when someone breaks the rules of the site with his thread. All other are open forever.
Daicarus said:Instead, this thread is tl;dr now, the unnecessary rage of people has had an adverse effect of what they were trying to achieve. People looking for the order will just scroll through until they find someone who just gives them the information they are looking for.
The answer was already given in the first few posts, there is not even a need to scroll. I think too many people just blurt out their opinions, good or bad, without explaining the context around it tho, which is why i try to provide that context in my own posts.
Now, there is also the fact that it's far from the first time fans of the story have to explain the order as they are constantly annoyed by people pushing the chronological order who, obviously, didn't even understood the base-level reading of the story, while there was absolutely no such things for over a decade.
Daicarus said:Can you imagine how confused classical music folks were when heavy metal came to being?
Doesn't hold the comparison for me; you are talking about a creation process, whereas it's about an alteration of something already fully created in our case. It makes more sense if we talk about remixed songs, but these remixes does lose the emotions, and possibly the storytelling too, there was to the original. Furthermore, that's something that is done only after having already experienced the original, that had the intent of the artist. That's why i'm not annoyed by different re-watch orders.
Daicarus said:You sound arrogant making examples like that, thinking you are better in your traditional ways compared to someone sharing new ideas.
Maybe, but it's also unbelievably arrogant to think that you are the one that will make a revolution. There is way, way more stupid people than visionary ones in this world.