The problem with every thread like this is that it is ignorantly thoughtless. Here are two rudimental aspects of a fair criticism.
One, you should have dissected it in details. Of course not all titles need to be viewed till the very end for one to judge, yet dissecting is regardless important. One problem that I have with many viewers is that they are quick to complain without putting any thoughts into certain things. With unhinged mentality of yours, the hatred you brought made little to no sense whatsoever. After thoroughly understanding the artistic decisions of the director/author, the allusions, the underlying themes, etc. then you may decide to bash/praise it publicly or not.
Two, you need to lay some proper foundation for your argument. We are no egocentric kids to just blindly accept things as they are. We need to see your argumentation. This is baseless and foolish. Statement such as “boring” will not help. My questions are, “why?” and “how?”.
So far, I’ve been completely objective here as I have yet to say anything about whether HxH is good or not. So mind you, I’m wholly talking about your poor and biased claim deriving from a problematic mindset. Since art is subjective, every criticism with genuine insights and thoughts put into it should be valid, however disagreeable. Your case isn’t, unfortunately enough.
Now, I will talk subjectively. Personally, I view Phantom Troupe arc as one of the most flawed arcs (if not, the most) in this show. I will shortly divide this section into two main points - writing and directing (execution). On one hand, I believe the writing is incredible and very well thought out, I think we can all agree on that. Long story short, villains are great, Kurapika is great, Gon’s hypocrisy is well emphasized and Killua’s character slowly and steadily witnesses great changes. On the other hand, the directing is actually the worst out of all arcs. I feel as though the arc chooses to believe the audience is actual 13 year-olds while contradicting itself with its dark nature and complexity in writing, via the reoccurrence of allusions to a point of obviousness in themes. The tone is inconsistent, the storytelling is lazy and dull. The reason why I’m saying this is that the pacing is evidently artlessly unstable, which results in the aforementioned: the obviousness of themes is thrown into our face with repetitive expositions which hinders the pacing from respectability, while events are swiftly shifted as means of grabbing one’s attention (fast-paced is always more fun, and they sure did focus a lot upon psychological battles instead of anything else equally important). Therefore, PT arc easily comes across as endless entertainment of thoughtlessness, where one can enjoy it without thinking with any further depth. Poor directing, really.
JustNino said:my honest opinion is that yorknew and chemira arc is a good arc but the thing is here. yorknew arc has so many flows that could treat as a bad arc. idk it's just I'm disappointed how it ended. Chemira arc has the best start idk you but i know yeah its slow pace but i enjoy it cuz they really did explain the concept and characters. and then heres the bullshit, Pitou could destroy them within 1 sec except netoro tbh. but wtf is this that gon act like his given the most stupid thing in anime the "power up" plot device. seriously kumugi's character ruined the hype i don't hate her but the result is a total let down. There's no developments in this arc only on killuas side. characters is so unbalanced you notice how the yankee can match the guards which is primarily bullshit
Chimera Ant arc, to be frank, is highly calculative, mature and smart. You can debate however you want, but to me, this arc does not simply either tell or show, it does both without straightforwardness. Which reminds me of the movie Persona, but that’s a different story. What CA arc does so exceptionally is how it has a narrator and yet nothing is ever obvious. CA arc is something that doesn’t try to merely grab your attention, or to even entertain you. To me, it was philosophical, dark and heartbreaking rather than entertaining. Characterization is latent but is not quite ‘there’ for you to see. It is also poetic and rhetorically beautiful. From the parallel journey of Meruem and Gon, to the relationship of Gon and Pitou, and most significantly, the burst out of Gon’s hypocrisy and his character “defect” leading to a catastrophic event not for him but for Killua, all were just harmonic and gorgeous. Certainly I’m not gonna bypass Komugi, a key plot device of the arc. Komugi would be rather weak in terms of characterization if she were to standalone, and yet her human interaction with Meruem is beautiful. There are a lot of themes, heavy and difficult ones I’d say, in this arc that one simply tells but not verbally explores. This is on you, viewer. It is not the responsibility of the author and director if their desire is for you to explore and yet you didn’t. |