Why is it seen as racist to not like Multicultures?

marriage said:
Culture is not the same thing as race. And if you dont want to live near certain people based on the color of their skin, youre a racist

marriage said:
Culture is not the same thing as race.

Baman said:
Multiculturalism on a societal scale doesn't work, this much has been a known fact throughout all of history. Just because we aren't in the middle ages anymore doesn't magically make it function.
Even a "cultural melting pot" like the US, without any historical heritage as it is (RIP native Americans) has problems and conflicts between majority and minority cultures. At best, you get ghettoes and chinatowns where pocket societies develop and generally stay out of trouble, but all you need is a small spark to ignite a chaos of us-vs-them rhetoric, much like the recent debacle over black criminals getting shot by cops. Even at best of times multiculturalism is a veritable powder keg, ready to blow when someone lights the fuse.

Naturally, things are much more dire in Europe, where you have cultures rooted in centuries of tradition and history, who have to contend with "them" moving in and forming their own enclaves. We don't have to look very far back to see how badly things can go; the Jews in Europe had been disliked and often demonised because of their weird and clannish, insular ways and outright spite for the "goyim". Their eventual persecution was a inevitability.

Racism, ethnocentrism and skepticism to outsiders are all evolutionarily beneficial traits hardwired into our genes, they do not disappear no matter how much people tell themselves they are progressive and tolerant. All we need is a reason to be suspicious or fearful for these outsiders, whether they're heretics poisoning our wells or stealing our jobs and mooching off of welfare.

All cultures have their place, in their own ancestral lands. People moving to and fro in itself is not a problem, but when you have large populations of immigrants displacing the original population of a region and refusing to acclimatize and adapt to their host culture, shit will be almost guaranteed to hit the fan at some point.
The solution is integration and adaptation. When in Rome, do as the Romans, don't build walls around yourself because your neighbour is different.

But sadly, in several places cultural Marxism has corrupted large parts of academia (particularly the humanities, like anthropology and the SJW circlejerk fests like Women's studies) as well as holding sway over the media. Always needing to fabricate conflict for PR purposes or clickbait-whoring, scummy politicians and journalists forge the narrative and steer any critique of their destructive, progressive views into ludicrous parodies of Nazism and racism.
Luckily I don't live in Sweden.

Baman said:
The solution is integration and adaptation. When in Rome, do as the Romans, don't build walls around yourself because your neighbour is different.

Baman said:
Multiculturalism on a societal scale doesn't work, this much has been a known fact throughout all of history. Just because we aren't in the middle ages anymore doesn't magically make it function.
Even a "cultural melting pot" like the US, without any historical heritage as it is (RIP native Americans) has problems and conflicts between majority and minority cultures. At best, you get ghettoes and chinatowns where pocket societies develop and generally stay out of trouble, but all you need is a small spark to ignite a chaos of us-vs-them rhetoric, much like the recent debacle over black criminals getting shot by cops. Even at best of times multiculturalism is a veritable powder keg, ready to blow when someone lights the fuse.

Naturally, things are much more dire in Europe, where you have cultures rooted in centuries of tradition and history, who have to contend with "them" moving in and forming their own enclaves. We don't have to look very far back to see how badly things can go; the Jews in Europe had been disliked and often demonised because of their weird and clannish, insular ways and outright spite for the "goyim". Their eventual persecution was a inevitability.

Racism, ethnocentrism and skepticism to outsiders are all evolutionarily beneficial traits hardwired into our genes, they do not disappear no matter how much people tell themselves they are progressive and tolerant. All we need is a reason to be suspicious or fearful for these outsiders, whether they're heretics poisoning our wells or stealing our jobs and mooching off of welfare.

All cultures have their place, in their own ancestral lands. People moving to and fro in itself is not a problem, but when you have large populations of immigrants displacing the original population of a region and refusing to acclimatize and adapt to their host culture, shit will be almost guaranteed to hit the fan at some point.
The solution is integration and adaptation. When in Rome, do as the Romans, don't build walls around yourself because your neighbour is different.

But sadly, in several places cultural Marxism has corrupted large parts of academia (particularly the humanities, like anthropology and the SJW circlejerk fests like Women's studies) as well as holding sway over the media. Always needing to fabricate conflict for PR purposes or clickbait-whoring, scummy politicians and journalists forge the narrative and steer any critique of their destructive, progressive views into ludicrous parodies of Nazism and racism.
Luckily I don't live in Sweden.

marriage said:
Culture is not the same thing as race. And if you dont want to live near certain people based on the color of their skin, youre a racist

MdDaniels said:


Just like the vast majority of the people on this planet then?, just look at how racially diverse (segregated) the united states is.

Also this whole "you're a wayyyciissst" diversity shit is only pushed on white countries, why? lol good looking people perhaps? or maybe white people are so thoroughly domesticated and civilized that to the uncivilized bloodsuckers in the outside world they're nothing more then literal doormats to be taken advantage of.

josh_ said:
No forum is complete without a white supremacist. MdDaniels is ours, and we're glad to have him.

josh_ said:
No forum is complete without a white supremacist. MdDaniels is ours, and we're glad to have him.

josh_ said:
I agree, but I don't think it's that simple. Canadians and Americans, for example, know (from our histories of interacting with natives) that aggressive integration strategies can dehumanize the "outsiders" and, at worst, devolve into thinly veiled genocide. The best solution is somewhere between the extremes of no-integration-multiculturalism and aggressive integration.

You know, let Muslims have mosques and wear whatever they want, but do not allow Islam to influence public institutions. Easier said than done.

Baman said:
Yea, it has to be done smartly.
From what I've read and heard, Denmark seem to have a good idea of what to do, ensuring that immigrants seeking asylum are allocated around the country rather than being allowed to form up in ghettoes and create pocket cultures. In some places, the state even throws in extra expenses to bus children of immigrant descent to schools further away, to ensure they interact with native Danes as well rather than going to schools dominated by immigrants.

This approach is being done to some extent in Norway too, but ghettofication is still a problem, primarily around Oslo. That's not to say it is a huge problem, and certainly nowhere near the scale seen in Sweden, but it is a warning sign when you see young, second generation immigrants form up around extremist and even going off to fight for terrorist organisations abroad.
Either way it's certainly something we should keep an eye on and seek to prevent, rather than perpetuating the unrealistic ideals of multiculturalism utopias.

Baman said:
Yea, it has to be done smartly.
From what I've read and heard, Denmark seem to have a good idea of what to do, ensuring that immigrants seeking asylum are allocated around the country rather than being allowed to form up in ghettoes and create pocket cultures. In some places, the state even throws in extra expenses to bus children of immigrant descent to schools further away, to ensure they interact with native Danes as well rather than going to schools dominated by immigrants.

This approach is being done to some extent in Norway too, but ghettofication is still a problem, primarily around Oslo. That's not to say it is a huge problem, and certainly nowhere near the scale seen in Sweden, but it is a warning sign when you see young, second generation immigrants form up around extremist and even going off to fight for terrorist organisations abroad.
Either way it's certainly something we should keep an eye on and seek to prevent, rather than perpetuating the unrealistic ideals of multiculturalism utopias.

NicoIsPathetic said:
Why is Sweden the Scandinavian outlier? Kinda curious.

Soul-Master said:
Seems efficient. But what about countries that lack resources to do this?
Also, many of the immigrant's children are usually discriminated in schools. Are schools dominated by immigrants a bad idea?

Consequent said:
OP you're stupid.

Solipsistic said:
So ends the streak of quality replies. And I was proud of this thread so far.

Otaku-Ninja8 said:

I disagree, race and culture go hand in hand.

Solipsistic said:
So ends the streak of quality replies. And I was proud of this thread so far.

DrGeroCreation said:
Not really. An Afro Brazilian person would have a different culture than an African American person and both their cultures would be different from the culture of someone from Ghana. Society (in this case nationality) has a far greater influence on culture than race.

Otaku-Ninja8 said:
culture and race are both essentially contested concepts.