Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums
New
Oct 31, 2014 4:11 AM
#1

Offline
Jan 2013
12227
I see a lot of people saying it's under rated because of the cgi and I've even heaRd people say this show has good cgi.

Neither of those things are true man this show is just trash.

Idk how someone could realistically believe this show is under rated.

Arpeggio is rated fairly highly and it is a cgi show


Someone explain to me why anyone with any sort of intelligence would like this shit..
Oct 31, 2014 4:13 AM
#2

Offline
Jan 2013
13161
People like different things; I don't see the issue.
Oct 31, 2014 4:14 AM
#3

Offline
Jan 2011
26345
People are saying this has good CGI?
Oct 31, 2014 4:21 AM
#4

Offline
Oct 2014
475
i just skimmed through episode 1............. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTbmksOq7lY

ummm im with you on this, it looks terrible, cliche characters and story (blue sub 6 clone), but i could see people aged 8 to 14 possibly thinking its a good anime, but there the type of people who get hooked onto anything that seems like its gonna have possible romance between MC's.
the animation and CGI look 2nd rate to me, after watching code geass and clannad after storys animation, this animation looks cheap to me.
Oct 31, 2014 2:40 PM
#5

Offline
Jan 2013
12227
ReaperCreeper said:
People are saying this has good CGI?


Read discussion forums
Nov 2, 2014 7:53 PM
#6

Offline
Jun 2014
10654
shuryukan said:
People like different things; I don't see the issue.


This. Everybody has different taste.
Nov 2, 2014 7:57 PM
#7

Offline
Sep 2011
11111
chrisedmonds said:
i just skimmed through episode 1............. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTbmksOq7lY

ummm im with you on this, it looks terrible, cliche characters and story (blue sub 6 clone), but i could see people aged 8 to 14 possibly thinking its a good anime, but there the type of people who get hooked onto anything that seems like its gonna have possible romance between MC's.
the animation and CGI look 2nd rate to me, after watching code geass and clannad after storys animation, this animation looks cheap to me.


lol



Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet
Nov 3, 2014 1:18 AM
#8

Offline
Jan 2013
12227
Kagami_Hiiragi said:
shuryukan said:
People like different things; I don't see the issue.


This. Everybody has different taste.


Some people have shit taste.

Special Snowflake disorder isnt an excuse for it.
Nov 3, 2014 1:23 AM
#9

Offline
Dec 2012
2266
I don't have intelligence, I live in Europe, and I don't know what hip is.

So fuck off.
Nov 22, 2014 8:57 PM

Offline
Jun 2014
10654
SolvitePriest said:
Kagami_Hiiragi said:


This. Everybody has different taste.


Some people have shit taste.

Special Snowflake disorder isnt an excuse for it.


I'd rather talk to these people with this so called shit taste over people who try to downgrade someone's opinion/taste because they like stuff that the person saying they have shit taste does not.
Nov 23, 2014 7:40 AM

Offline
Jun 2009
254
I didn't like it at first, but I thought it had potential. The first few episodes were horrible, but it's gotten really good so far. In terms of the CGI, there are times when it looks bad but other times when it's stunning.

I don't think everyone will like this anime, but it grew on me.
[/center]
Nov 30, 2014 9:18 PM
Offline
Nov 2014
2
All these "anime" is to tell something: A story

The animation is an artistic plus that could be essential to the story or could not.

The story could be tell in a very wide range of variety and that is the art of the tale teller. Even the very same story can have different "feeling" if the speed is different (usually what happens when they port an story from the manga to an anime).

This is tale that is not being told in a conventional way.

The little bursts of 10 mins are to tell us a story and they are told like little pieces of a puzzle (the usual is to tell how the history develops from certain point) to get to a grand finale.

Being explained all this... I can just tell that everyone that says something is shit just by looking one piece of the puzzle is either an impatiente dumb or a retard that has never read a book.
TylerCiggyNov 30, 2014 9:40 PM
Dec 10, 2014 10:34 PM
Offline
Jun 2012
56
SolvitePriest said:
I see a lot of people saying it's under rated because of the cgi and I've even heaRd people say this show has good cgi.

Neither of those things are true man this show is just trash.

Idk how someone could realistically believe this show is under rated.

Arpeggio is rated fairly highly and it is a cgi show


Someone explain to me why anyone with any sort of intelligence would like this shit..


People think by emotion not what is true, see the science:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ
Dec 13, 2014 12:42 PM

Offline
Apr 2011
1149
Oh look, another shithead who believes his opinion is objective fact.

Piss off, Solvite.
Dec 13, 2014 8:45 PM

Offline
Jun 2013
1771
SolvitePriest said:
I see a lot of people saying it's under rated because of the cgi and I've even heaRd people say this show has good cgi.

Neither of those things are true man this show is just trash.

Idk how someone could realistically believe this show is under rated.

Arpeggio is rated fairly highly and it is a cgi show


Someone explain to me why anyone with any sort of intelligence would like this shit..



I think somebody need to watch Rooster Teeth Studio Red vs Blue series & RWBY series before says Karen Senki is bad anime just because the CGI
SSSS_ShunariaDec 13, 2014 8:49 PM
Dec 14, 2014 5:11 AM

Offline
Jul 2009
4805
R
Hidayat246 said:
SolvitePriest said:
I see a lot of people saying it's under rated because of the cgi and I've even heaRd people say this show has good cgi.

Neither of those things are true man this show is just trash.

Idk how someone could realistically believe this show is under rated.

Arpeggio is rated fairly highly and it is a cgi show


Someone explain to me why anyone with any sort of intelligence would like this shit..



I think somebody need to watch Rooster Teeth Studio Red vs Blue series & RWBY series before says Karen Senki is bad anime just because the CGI
Hidayat246 said:
SolvitePriest said:
I see a lot of people saying it's under rated because of the cgi and I've even heaRd people say this show has good cgi.

Neither of those things are true man this show is just trash.

Idk how someone could realistically believe this show is under rated.

Arpeggio is rated fairly highly and it is a cgi show


Someone explain to me why anyone with any sort of intelligence would like this shit..



I think somebody need to watch Rooster Teeth Studio Red vs Blue series & RWBY series before says Karen Senki is bad anime just because the CGI


RWBY 1st season was actually better, but the 2nd was kinda lame too...
Well, I finished KS without understanding some stuff, it was just fight between robots and human, nothin deep...
Dec 18, 2014 3:12 PM

Offline
Feb 2010
34597
This was on the path to the bottom 100 from the start without a doubt, but then again somewhere, someone probably also found Pupa good so I'm not surprised.

I just find it hilarious that this gets praised for the CGI when I've seen so much better CGI being bashed in the anime community.
I probably regret this post by now.
Mar 1, 2015 7:26 PM

Offline
Jun 2009
345
It's decent, not trash. Certainly more entertaining that RWBY.

More topics from this board

Poll: » Karen Senki Episode 11 Discussion

Stark700 - Dec 6, 2014

22 by hacker09 »»
Jun 13, 2020 8:43 AM

Poll: » Karen Senki Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 )

Stark700 - Sep 27, 2014

68 by Ranxomare »»
Aug 2, 2016 11:09 AM

Poll: » Karen Senki Episode 10 Discussion

Stark700 - Nov 29, 2014

11 by AndroidJacket »»
Jan 9, 2015 3:50 AM

Poll: » Karen Senki Episode 9 Discussion

Stark700 - Nov 22, 2014

13 by AndroidJacket »»
Jan 9, 2015 3:39 AM

Poll: » Karen Senki Episode 8 Discussion

Stark700 - Nov 15, 2014

9 by AndroidJacket »»
Jan 9, 2015 3:29 AM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login