New
Apr 7, 2014 12:01 PM
#51
OngPQ said: gravityhappens said: OngPQ said: gravityhappens said: If I had a boyfriend and he slept with someone else I would cut his dick of while he was sleeping and feed it to my pet dog. Damn, that escalated quickly. This is a gentle reminder to all otakus to please avoid her for your own safety.. A real yandere Sadly not the first time I've heard that Any past boyfriends? Hope they are still alive if there were He's alive, but I got my revenge, psychologically speaking. |
out-ofthe-woods.tumblr.com (✿◠‿◠) |
Apr 7, 2014 12:02 PM
#52
gravityhappens said: OngPQ said: gravityhappens said: OngPQ said: gravityhappens said: If I had a boyfriend and he slept with someone else I would cut his dick of while he was sleeping and feed it to my pet dog. Damn, that escalated quickly. This is a gentle reminder to all otakus to please avoid her for your own safety.. A real yandere Sadly not the first time I've heard that Any past boyfriends? Hope they are still alive if there were He's alive, but I got my revenge, psychologically speaking. Please tell me that fascinating tale, I wanna feel alive at 3am over here |
Apr 7, 2014 12:02 PM
#53
Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: like, psh, who cares about dicks and pussies right? i like you. you're a guy who only cares about tits. biological sex should obviously be determined by the presences or lack-thereof tits.RedArmyShogun said: Dark_Chaos said: No, I'd say it's a fetish of some sort. Though she has a rod, she's probably female in every other way, and maybe feminine too. Biologics> Aesthetics *Raises the flame shield* But shemales and all that still have tits though. Not sure you can call someone who has tits a man :S Kinda twisting my words there, buddy. I never said any of that. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:03 PM
#54
OngPQ said: gravityhappens said: OngPQ said: gravityhappens said: OngPQ said: gravityhappens said: If I had a boyfriend and he slept with someone else I would cut his dick of while he was sleeping and feed it to my pet dog. Damn, that escalated quickly. This is a gentle reminder to all otakus to please avoid her for your own safety.. A real yandere Sadly not the first time I've heard that Any past boyfriends? Hope they are still alive if there were He's alive, but I got my revenge, psychologically speaking. Please tell me that fascinating tale, I wanna feel alive at 3am over here Let's just say he's mentally ill now. |
out-ofthe-woods.tumblr.com (✿◠‿◠) |
Apr 7, 2014 12:05 PM
#55
Dark_Chaos said: exactly, i said that stuff. i said it about you. it was done with my keyboard, on mal through my internet browser. amazing technology.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: like, psh, who cares about dicks and pussies right? i like you. you're a guy who only cares about tits. biological sex should obviously be determined by the presences or lack-thereof tits.RedArmyShogun said: Dark_Chaos said: No, I'd say it's a fetish of some sort. Though she has a rod, she's probably female in every other way, and maybe feminine too. Biologics> Aesthetics *Raises the flame shield* But shemales and all that still have tits though. Not sure you can call someone who has tits a man :S Kinda twisting my words there, buddy. I never said any of that. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:06 PM
#56
Apr 7, 2014 12:08 PM
#57
Red_Keys said: whoa man, keep your waifu stuff to yourself. it's off-topic and probably offends angry mothers.If people would stop worrying about catching TEH GAYYY, the world would be a better place. Who gives a fucking shit. It's cartoon drawings. Nobody cares about your insecure sexuality. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:08 PM
#58
gravityhappens said: Let's just say he's mentally ill now. So crushed his confidence and sent him into a spiral of depression? |
Apr 7, 2014 12:08 PM
#59
Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: exactly, i said that stuff. i said it about you. it was done with my keyboard, on mal through my internet browser. amazing technology.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: like, psh, who cares about dicks and pussies right? i like you. you're a guy who only cares about tits. biological sex should obviously be determined by the presences or lack-thereof tits.RedArmyShogun said: Dark_Chaos said: No, I'd say it's a fetish of some sort. Though she has a rod, she's probably female in every other way, and maybe feminine too. Biologics> Aesthetics *Raises the flame shield* But shemales and all that still have tits though. Not sure you can call someone who has tits a man :S Kinda twisting my words there, buddy. I never said any of that. I'm aware, but you claimed something about me that wasn't true, and I don't appreciate that, and as a result, my opinion of you has lowered a little. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:09 PM
#60
Astros477 said: gravityhappens said: Let's just say he's mentally ill now. So crushed his confidence and sent him into a spiral of depression? Yeah. He still has feelings for me but he thinks I'm psychotic and should see a therapist before he considers getting back together with me. |
out-ofthe-woods.tumblr.com (✿◠‿◠) |
Apr 7, 2014 12:10 PM
#61
Dark_Chaos said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statement was, great hero of mal.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: exactly, i said that stuff. i said it about you. it was done with my keyboard, on mal through my internet browser. amazing technology.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: like, psh, who cares about dicks and pussies right? i like you. you're a guy who only cares about tits. biological sex should obviously be determined by the presences or lack-thereof tits.RedArmyShogun said: Dark_Chaos said: No, I'd say it's a fetish of some sort. Though she has a rod, she's probably female in every other way, and maybe feminine too. Biologics> Aesthetics *Raises the flame shield* But shemales and all that still have tits though. Not sure you can call someone who has tits a man :S Kinda twisting my words there, buddy. I never said any of that. I'm aware, but you claimed something about me that wasn't true, and I don't appreciate that, and as a result, my opinion of you has lowered a little. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:11 PM
#62
Astros477 said: gravityhappens said: Let's just say he's mentally ill now. So crushed his confidence and sent him into a spiral of depression? Rather have his confidence crushed than his balls |
Apr 7, 2014 12:11 PM
#63
Whats the problem he obviously found her attractive and enjoyed it anyway even after knowing about it. The only problem he has is that now his social conditioning has kicked in and his brain is telling him he wasn't supposed to like it and that its bad. He should get over such petty social ideas and start trusting in what his body and own mind say, if he liked it whats the problem. Chalk it up to a one time thing and move on. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:14 PM
#64
Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statement was, great hero of mal.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: exactly, i said that stuff. i said it about you. it was done with my keyboard, on mal through my internet browser. amazing technology.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: like, psh, who cares about dicks and pussies right? i like you. you're a guy who only cares about tits. biological sex should obviously be determined by the presences or lack-thereof tits.RedArmyShogun said: Dark_Chaos said: No, I'd say it's a fetish of some sort. Though she has a rod, she's probably female in every other way, and maybe feminine too. Biologics> Aesthetics *Raises the flame shield* But shemales and all that still have tits though. Not sure you can call someone who has tits a man :S Kinda twisting my words there, buddy. I never said any of that. I'm aware, but you claimed something about me that wasn't true, and I don't appreciate that, and as a result, my opinion of you has lowered a little. Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:15 PM
#65
Red_Keys said: If people would stop worrying about catching TEH GAYYY, the world would be a better place. Who gives a fucking shit. It's cartoon drawings. Nobody cares about your insecure sexuality. Woah there buddy, we never said there was anything wrong with it. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:16 PM
#66
OngPQ said: Rather have his confidence crushed than his balls About the same thing right? Oh wait forgot you can't grow your balls back... gravityhappens said: Yeah. He still has feelings for me but he thinks I'm psychotic and should see a therapist before he considers getting back together with me. Ehh who's he to say, did he get a degree in psychology? You seem pretty straightforward with your intentions. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:17 PM
#67
Dark_Chaos said: Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. this thing i just said with a slight edit for clarity's sake said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statements were, great hero of mal. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:17 PM
#68
Astros477 said: gravityhappens said: Yeah. He still has feelings for me but he thinks I'm psychotic and should see a therapist before he considers getting back together with me. Ehh who's he to say, did he get a degree in psychology? You seem pretty straight forward with your intentions. He actually does have a psychology degree. But he was just as bad, he nearly killed me once because we were having an argument over the type of laptop I was buying. |
out-ofthe-woods.tumblr.com (✿◠‿◠) |
Apr 7, 2014 12:19 PM
#69
I came here for the Red_Keys. Thread delivered. You guys are clowns. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:19 PM
#70
Fiction-S said: it's ok, it's red_keys. he does this in every thread about gender and sexuality. just clap and observe.Red_Keys said: If people would stop worrying about catching TEH GAYYY, the world would be a better place. Who gives a fucking shit. It's cartoon drawings. Nobody cares about your insecure sexuality. Woah there buddy, we never said there was anything wrong with it. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:23 PM
#71
gravityhappens said: He actually does have a psychology degree. But he was just as bad, he nearly killed me once because we were having an argument over the type of laptop I was buying. Huh, must not have had the greatest grades. Psychotic is one suffering from psychosis, or detachment from reality(hallucinations/delusions). Psychopath is someone with unstable aggressive behavior which looks like both of you have. Damn murder over a laptop, that would have been a good motive.. |
AstrosApr 7, 2014 12:26 PM
Apr 7, 2014 12:24 PM
#72
Heredity said: Fiction-S said: it's ok, it's red_keys. he does this in every thread about gender and sexuality. just clap and observe.Red_Keys said: If people would stop worrying about catching TEH GAYYY, the world would be a better place. Who gives a fucking shit. It's cartoon drawings. Nobody cares about your insecure sexuality. Woah there buddy, we never said there was anything wrong with it. Is this what we all came for? |
Apr 7, 2014 12:24 PM
#73
I'm a little confused. Did your friend like how the person looked with the penis and the feminine traits or did he like the sex itself? Either way, it wouldn't make you gay. Having sex with someone with a penis is going to feel good whether or not you're gay, if he was on top then it would be just like having anal with any other woman and if he was on the bottom, men have a g-spot in their prostate so it would feel good irregardless of sexual orientation. Being attracted to the fact that she was pre-op isn't gay either. A gender is dictated by what's between your ears, not what's between your legs. If he was attracted to a woman with a penis, he was still attracted to a woman so it isn't gay. If he was attracted to only the penis then maybe he would be a little bi-curious but even then, why would anybody care? |
YouAreNotSugoiApr 7, 2014 12:28 PM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:27 PM
#74
Astros477 said: gravityhappens said: He actually does have a psychology degree. But he was just as bad, he nearly killed me once because we were having an argument over the type of laptop I was buying. Huh, must not have had the greatest grades. Psychotic is one suffering from psychosis, or detachment from reality(hallucinations/delusions). Psychopath is someone with unstable aggressive behavior which looks like both of you have. Damn murder over a laptop, that would have been a good motive huh.. Nah he didnt get a good grade and I did half of his degree for him. And yeah, he disliked macbooks so much that he would slam his breaks whilst going down a rainy motorway at 90mph causing the car to spin in circles and nearly kill us both. |
out-ofthe-woods.tumblr.com (✿◠‿◠) |
Apr 7, 2014 12:28 PM
#75
YouAreNotSugoi said: A gender is dictated by what's between your ears, not what's between your legs. Word. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:30 PM
#76
Astros477 said: i stopped taking her seriously at 'he nearly killed me once.'gravityhappens said: He actually does have a psychology degree. But he was just as bad, he nearly killed me once because we were having an argument over the type of laptop I was buying. Huh, must not have had the greatest grades. Psychotic is one suffering from psychosis, or detachment from reality(hallucinations/delusions). Psychopath is someone with unstable aggressive behavior which looks like both of you have. Damn murder over a laptop, that would have been a good motive.. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:31 PM
#77
Heredity said: Astros477 said: i stopped taking her seriously at 'he nearly killed me once.'gravityhappens said: He actually does have a psychology degree. But he was just as bad, he nearly killed me once because we were having an argument over the type of laptop I was buying. Huh, must not have had the greatest grades. Psychotic is one suffering from psychosis, or detachment from reality(hallucinations/delusions). Psychopath is someone with unstable aggressive behavior which looks like both of you have. Damn murder over a laptop, that would have been a good motive.. We had a very intense relationship. |
out-ofthe-woods.tumblr.com (✿◠‿◠) |
Apr 7, 2014 12:33 PM
#78
YouAreNotSugoi said: only if (s)he was undergoing hormone replacement.Being attracted to the fact that she was pre-op isn't gay either. A gender is dictated by what's between your ears, not what's between your legs. If he was attracted to a woman with a penis, he was still attracted to a woman so it isn't gay. i do find it amusing that humanity would rather make all these hair splitting labels rather than just say 'yeah, i think i like both penises and vaginas.' |
Apr 7, 2014 12:35 PM
#79
Heredity said: i stopped taking her seriously at 'he nearly killed me once.' Much attention seeking. So crazy Much relationship WOW |
Apr 7, 2014 12:36 PM
#80
Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. this thing i just said with a slight edit for clarity's sake said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statements were, great hero of mal. How so? Explain yourself. It's easy to say something is wrong or "dumb", but explaining why is the tricky part. Can you manage to do that, Mr Heredity? |
Apr 7, 2014 12:36 PM
#81
gravityhappens said: Nah he didnt get a good grade and I did half of his degree for him. And yeah, he disliked macbooks so much that he would slam his breaks whilst going down a rainy motorway at 90mph causing the car to spin in circles and nearly kill us both. lol, that explains a bit. Wow he indeed seems emotionally unstable and irresponsible. After that I wouldn't have ridden with him if I were you. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:37 PM
#82
Astros477 said: gravityhappens said: He actually does have a psychology degree. But he was just as bad, he nearly killed me once because we were having an argument over the type of laptop I was buying. Huh, must not have had the greatest grades. Psychotic is one suffering from psychosis, or detachment from reality(hallucinations/delusions). Psychopath is someone with unstable aggressive behavior which looks like both of you have. Damn murder over a laptop, that would have been a good motive.. Actually, I have a friend who is clinically considered a psychopath and most of them usually suffer from 'blunted affect' and tend to be calm, collective and much better grounded than the normal person, not aggressive, the definition is extremely misconstrued by the media. The lowly sociopath is perhaps the personality type you are referring to and most psychopaths view them as mischievous and childish. YouAreNotSugoi said: A gender is dictated by what's between your ears, not what's between your legs. No it isn't, transgenderism is considered a psychological illness you can look it up if you wish. Too be honest we wouldn't be having this problem if our society didn't place so much importance on gender roles. Who gives a fuck if some guy wears a skirt? Does it make him female? No, it doesn't but who cares if he enjoys it. |
I am on the edge ! The edge of the edgiest edge ever edged by edgekind ! я умерте ужасну депрессии... |
Apr 7, 2014 12:39 PM
#83
Dark_Chaos said: all mammals have mammary glands, numpnuts. male and female.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. this thing i just said with a slight edit for clarity's sake said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statements were, great hero of mal. How so? Explain yourself. It's easy to say something is wrong or "dumb", but explaining why is the tricky part. Can you manage to do that, Mr Heredity? |
Apr 7, 2014 12:40 PM
#84
MorsPulchra said: Homosexuality was considered a psychological illness as wellNo it isn't, transgenderism is considered a psychological illness you can look it up if you wish. Too be honest we wouldn't be having this problem if our society didn't place so much importance on gender roles. Who gives a fuck if some guy wears a skirt? Does it make him female? No, it doesn't but who cares if he enjoys it. DSMV =/= Absolute truth From another thread, but: Mogu-sama said: Good question, actually Psychologists use the DSMV (some of them, at least): "The current version of the DSM characterizes a mental disorder as “a clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern that occurs in an individual [which] is associated with present distress...or disability...or with a significant increased risk of suffering." Here There is a philosophical concern of whether we consider distress caused by social taboo to be clinically viable in a diagnosis. It's unlikely to be reasonable to assume that, as then anyone with opposing political concerns who has faced distress over that would have a mental disorder, which is inevitable on some issues if you speak of them But we'll consider this in the case of homosexuality, bisexuality, and transgenderism, so: "significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern... associated with present distress" Then we must consider the where the distress of an individual comes from, if you ask me and I'd hypothesize any other homosexual people, I'd say that it isn't homosexuality itself that causes any distress. Rather the social reaction to that status, how people perceive and react to you Therefore -as we consider any sexuality to be a significant behavioral pattern- because homosexuality/bisexuality does not cause distress by itself, it is unreasonable to classify it as a mental disorder Onto transgenderism, which is second-hand knowledge to me, but I think I can make a case. Undoubtedly transgender individuals experience distress, at least at some point, this sense of distress comes from two primary sources: a) Social discrimination b) A body in-congruent with their mind We already discount social discrimination because that is not the condition itself, so we have to look at the gender dysphoria caused by B. Transgender people do not have an issue of self within their own heads, I'm rather sure they know who they are and only experience the dysphoria on account of their body not matching up. As evidenced by the elimination of gender dysphoria post-transition. So, the GD comes from a physical component (the body) and is eliminated by physical actions (transition of the body). GD cannot (to my knowledge) be treated with any form of mind affecting drug (anti-depressants and the like). Now consider how we categorize other disorders, say, a headache from dehydration. The distress (headache) is caused by a physical component (lack of water) and is treated with a physical action (consumption of water). We consider this a physical disorder As such it is then reasonable to consider how we categorize transgenderism. The distress (GD) is caused by a physical component (body incongruency) and is treated with a physical action (transition of the body). The DSMV specifies "a behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern", yet in this case we cannot directly observe the mind as being the instigator for the distress. Rather that in all cases I am aware of, the issue is with the material and is promptly solved entirely in the material. If I failed in my logic somewhere, do tell, I haven't puzzled this out so extensively before |
Mogu-samaApr 7, 2014 1:12 PM
Want to talk? Club! "Would you like an anti-psychotic?" *Bonus points if you leave a comment about the meaning of my signature.* |
Apr 7, 2014 12:45 PM
#85
Mogu-sama said: you argued by definition by taking two separate definitions, pushing them together to suit your liking and then continuing that line of thought. so the entire point is fallacious and all in all pointless.If I failed in my logic somewhere, do tell, I haven't puzzled this out so extensively before |
Apr 7, 2014 12:47 PM
#86
Mogu-sama said: MorsPulchra said: Homosexuality was considered a psychological illness as wellNo it isn't, transgenderism is considered a psychological illness you can look it up if you wish. Too be honest we wouldn't be having this problem if our society didn't place so much importance on gender roles. Who gives a fuck if some guy wears a skirt? Does it make him female? No, it doesn't but who cares if he enjoys it. DSMV =/= Absolute truth From another thread, but: Mogu-sama said: Good question, actually We have to consider the two parts of the title "mental disorder" We'll define disorder first, using the definition as applied to the medical world: http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/54859 5. A disturbance of the bodily (or mental) functions; an ailment, disease. (Usually a weaker term than disease n., and not implying structural change.) Then mental: http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/116537 2. Carried on or performed by the mind; taking place in the mind; formed in the mind. See also mental arithmetic n., mental reservation n. Therefore, a mental disorder is a disturbance (a kind block in function) to actions carried out in the mind. For example, processing information is an action carried out in the mind; we would call it a mental disorder when that condition impedes the processing of information and can be isolated as not being a symptom of a physical issue (for example, chronic pain) But maybe that isn't good enough, psychologists use the DSMV (some of them, at least): "The current version of the DSM characterizes a mental disorder as “a clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern that occurs in an individual [which] is associated with present distress...or disability...or with a significant increased risk of suffering." Here There is a philosophical concern of whether we consider distress caused by social taboo to be clinically viable in a diagnosis. It's unlikely to be reasonable to assume that, as then anyone with opposing political concerns who has faced distress over that would have a mental disorder, which is inevitable on some issues if you speak of them But we'll consider this in the case of homosexuality, bisexuality, and transgenderism, so: "significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern... associated with present distress" Then we must consider the where the distress of an individual comes from, if you ask me and I'd hypothesize any other homosexual people, I'd say that it isn't homosexuality itself that causes any distress. Rather the social reaction to that status, how people perceive and react to you Therefore -as we consider any sexuality to be a significant behavioral pattern- because homosexuality/bisexuality does not cause distress by itself, it is unreasonable to classify it as a mental disorder Onto transgenderism, which is second-hand knowledge to me, but I think I can make a case. Undoubtedly transgender individuals experience distress, at least at some point, this sense of distress comes from two primary sources: a) Social discrimination b) A body in-congruent with their mind We already discount social discrimination because that is not the condition itself, so we have to look at the gender dysphoria caused by B. Transgender people do not have an issue of self within their own heads, I'm rather sure they know who they are and only experience the dysphoria on account of their body not matching up. As evidenced by the elimination of gender dysphoria post-transition. So, the GD comes from a physical component (the body) and is eliminated by physical actions (transition of the body). GD cannot (to my knowledge) be treated with any form of mind affecting drug (anti-depressants and the like). Now consider how we categorize other disorders, say, a headache from dehydration. The distress (headache) is caused by a physical component (lack of water) and is treated with a physical action (consumption of water). We consider this a physical disorder As such it is then reasonable to consider how we categorize transgenderism. The distress (GD) is caused by a physical component (body incongruency) and is treated with a physical action (transition of the body). The DSMV specifies "a behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern", yet in this case we cannot directly observe the mind as being the instigator for the distress. Rather that in all cases I am aware of, the issue is with the material and is promptly solved entirely in the material. If I failed in my logic somewhere, do tell, I haven't puzzled this out so extensively before It still is consider that in parts. But transgenerism is a whole nother ugly ballpark. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:51 PM
#87
MorsPulchra said: Actually, I have a friend who is clinically considered a psychopath and most of them usually suffer from 'blunted affect' and tend to be calm, collective and much better grounded than the normal person, not aggressive, the definition is extremely misconstrued by the media. The lowly sociopath is perhaps the personality type you are referring to and most psychopaths view them as mischievous and childish. I should have put a comma between unstable and aggressive my bad :I. True they aren't necessarily aggressive. Though the use of sociopath and psychopath has been intertwined for awhile now that they can be viewed interchangeable. Personally I tend to see sociopaths as the calm quite ones and psychopaths their opposite. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:52 PM
#88
Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: all mammals have mammary glands, numpnuts. male and female.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. this thing i just said with a slight edit for clarity's sake said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statements were, great hero of mal. How so? Explain yourself. It's easy to say something is wrong or "dumb", but explaining why is the tricky part. Can you manage to do that, Mr Heredity? I'm aware, but I wasn't talking about "mammary glands". I was talking about female breasts. Surely even someone such as yourself can tell the difference between female breasts and a male chest? Or have you perhaps never seen them before? |
Apr 7, 2014 12:52 PM
#89
OngPQ said: gravityhappens said: If I had a boyfriend and he slept with someone else I would cut his dick of while he was sleeping and feed it to my pet dog. Damn, that escalated quickly. This is a gentle reminder to all otakus to please avoid her for your own safety.. A real yandere No, it's a gentle reminder to not be a cheating promiscuous scumbag. |
Apr 7, 2014 12:53 PM
#90
............................................________........................ ....................................,.-‘”...................``~.,.................. .............................,.-”...................................“-.,............ .........................,/...............................................”:,........ .....................,?......................................................,..... .................../...........................................................,}.... ................./......................................................,:`^`..}.... .............../...................................................,:”........./..... ..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../..... ............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../........ .........../(_....”~,_........“~,_....................,:`........_/........... ..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......“-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....}........... ...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../............ ...,,,___.`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../............. ............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-”............... ............/.`~,......`-...................................../................... .............`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....,__........... ,,_..........}.>-._...................................|..............`=~-,.... .....`=~-,__......`,......................................................... ...................`=~-,,.,...................................................... ................................`:,,...........................`..............__.. .....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``....... ........................................_..........._,-%.......`............... ...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`.............. and no unless you start having a craving for dick in your mouth then you are not becoming into a gay werewolf while looking at the full moon of another mans butt cheeks. Yeah but seriously no You're not (i think) |
Apr 7, 2014 12:58 PM
#91
Dark_Chaos said: gynecomastia (or 'man boobs' as they literally are) is a very common occurrence in males. men can even lactate given hormonal imbalance, since men have mammary glands.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: all mammals have mammary glands, numpnuts. male and female.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. this thing i just said with a slight edit for clarity's sake said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statements were, great hero of mal. How so? Explain yourself. It's easy to say something is wrong or "dumb", but explaining why is the tricky part. Can you manage to do that, Mr Heredity? I'm aware, but I wasn't talking about "mammary glands". I was talking about female breasts. Surely even someone such as yourself can tell the difference between female breasts and a male chest? Or have you perhaps never seen them before? of course though, i'd expect a user i've never come across to not know that i'm in a long term relationship. lol. |
no-thanksApr 7, 2014 1:03 PM
Apr 7, 2014 1:00 PM
#92
Almost forgot the OP and there dilemma XD sorry. Gay= If he likes it better and wants to give up the pussy game. Bi= If he liked it and wouldn't mind it in the future. Straight= If he would rather not have it happen again. That's all I know about sexuality except for transsexualism, though you didn't mention he feels female and wants take it up the bum more. |
AstrosApr 7, 2014 1:09 PM
Apr 7, 2014 1:01 PM
#93
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTKkQ5VCW7g |
an egomaniac and a fool |
Apr 7, 2014 1:01 PM
#94
Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: gynecomastia is a very common occurrence in males. men can even lactate given the right hormonal imbalance, since men have mammary glands.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: all mammals have mammary glands, numpnuts. male and female.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. this thing i just said with a slight edit for clarity's sake said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statements were, great hero of mal. How so? Explain yourself. It's easy to say something is wrong or "dumb", but explaining why is the tricky part. Can you manage to do that, Mr Heredity? I'm aware, but I wasn't talking about "mammary glands". I was talking about female breasts. Surely even someone such as yourself can tell the difference between female breasts and a male chest? Or have you perhaps never seen them before? Bullshit. Where is your source? |
Apr 7, 2014 1:03 PM
#95
Well, I like futa, and I don't think I'm gay if that helps |
Apr 7, 2014 1:03 PM
#96
Perhaps he just found her attractive as a women and just didn't mind a penis been attached. |
Apr 7, 2014 1:04 PM
#97
Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: gynecomastia (or 'man boobs' as they literally are) is a very common occurrence in males. men can even lactate given hormonal imbalance, since men have mammary glands.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: all mammals have mammary glands, numpnuts. male and female.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. this thing i just said with a slight edit for clarity's sake said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statements were, great hero of mal. How so? Explain yourself. It's easy to say something is wrong or "dumb", but explaining why is the tricky part. Can you manage to do that, Mr Heredity? I'm aware, but I wasn't talking about "mammary glands". I was talking about female breasts. Surely even someone such as yourself can tell the difference between female breasts and a male chest? Or have you perhaps never seen them before? Bullshit. Where is your source? |
Apr 7, 2014 1:07 PM
#98
If you (as a male) do anything sexual with something with a penis you are at the very least bisexual. "B-b-b-b-but they identify as a girl" doesn't change that they aren't one. Any living creature with a penis is factually defined as being male, it is not a choice, it's fucking biology. How you feel and what you want to be are not the same as what you factually are. There is no room for debate or questioning it at all. |
TallonKarrde23Apr 7, 2014 1:10 PM
Apr 7, 2014 1:08 PM
#99
Dark_Chaos said: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GynecomastiaBullshit. Where is your source? Heredity said: I dropped that and used the DSMV instead, which is a single definitionMogu-sama said: you argued by definition by taking two separate definitions, pushing them together to suit your liking and then continuing that line of thought. so the entire point is fallacious and all in all pointless.If I failed in my logic somewhere, do tell, I haven't puzzled this out so extensively before |
Mogu-samaApr 7, 2014 1:11 PM
Want to talk? Club! "Would you like an anti-psychotic?" *Bonus points if you leave a comment about the meaning of my signature.* |
Apr 7, 2014 1:11 PM
#100
Dark_Chaos said: it's quite common knowledge, but for the sake of appearing all wise and shit: here, here, and here.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: gynecomastia (or 'man boobs' as they literally are) is a very common occurrence in males. men can even lactate given hormonal imbalance, since men have mammary glands.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: all mammals have mammary glands, numpnuts. male and female.Heredity said: Dark_Chaos said: Perhaps on it's own, yes, but what you fail to realise is that it was a follow up to a previous statement I had made. Maybe you should learn to read, Mr Heredity. this thing i just said with a slight edit for clarity's sake said: i made a sarcastic post to show how dumb your statements were, great hero of mal. How so? Explain yourself. It's easy to say something is wrong or "dumb", but explaining why is the tricky part. Can you manage to do that, Mr Heredity? I'm aware, but I wasn't talking about "mammary glands". I was talking about female breasts. Surely even someone such as yourself can tell the difference between female breasts and a male chest? Or have you perhaps never seen them before? Bullshit. Where is your source? male lactation is rare, but possible. it's not exactly viable for breastfeeding (the world would probably be a better place if it was). |
More topics from this board
» Do you have a personal goal you're working toward right now?JustDefending - Oct 1 |
27 |
by MissHeed
»»
29 seconds ago |
|
» Isn't it technically impossible to prove other people exist?memeticmeme - 2 hours ago |
7 |
by 149597871
»»
6 minutes ago |
|
» All of you who learned English as a 2nd language, is your accent clear or thick?fleurbleue - 4 hours ago |
14 |
by 149597871
»»
10 minutes ago |
|
» are there any "Hikikomori" here like me?Ymir_The_Viking - Yesterday |
49 |
by LabMemberX
»»
16 minutes ago |
|
» Art that men will never understandComic_Sans - Feb 28, 2018 |
18 |
by AshitaNoJonas
»»
22 minutes ago |