New
Feb 24, 2014 12:24 PM
#51
Noldorin said: Is this your personal opinion or the law in your country? Laws about alcohol and drugs likely differ between countries. But I'm pretty sure in most countries if it's proven that a guy has a mental disorder that caused him to commit a crime he may not even go to the jail but be sent to an asylum instead. Surely you can't hold a sane and unsane person responsible for their actions to the same degree? No, it's how the law works everywhere, psychopathic disorder is not an excuse, neither is having taken drugs, it's how it works everywhere. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Feb 24, 2014 12:25 PM
#52
cabacc2 said: GuusWayne said: I'm not saying this is the case with all rape but a large percentage of it has the women in revealing clothing. We all have desires and the way women dress these days it's like they want to get raped, it's very provoking. I'd say they have a responsibility in that aspect. a large percentage? you obviously dont know how a lot of rape happens. actually its impossible to "want to get raped" if you want it to happen, its not rape. jailbait |
Feb 24, 2014 12:29 PM
#53
GuusWayne said: Women should be able to wear whatever they want without fear of being raped. The idea that "Oh, she was dressed like a slut, she's asking for it" does make sense, however men should know that raping is wrong. And being drunk or having some mental disorder doesn't make it any less bad.I'm not saying this is the case with all rape but a large percentage of it has the women in revealing clothing. We all have desires and the way women dress these days it's like they want to get raped, it's very provoking. I'd say they have a responsibility in that aspect. |
an egomaniac and a fool |
Feb 24, 2014 12:29 PM
#54
cabacc2 said: That's stupid, you gain nothing from inspiring fear into a stranger, it has to do calming your urges. Your research seem baseless.1. there is a high percentage of rape cases that are towards children. This already debunks your statement. 2. doing the necessary research is up to you. but.. one time: "i made a small research because i found ur question interesting and found out than first as i thought it is all about domination and wanting to inspire fear in the victim rather than wanting to calm an urge or desire for sex , so therefor raping has little to do with what the person being raped is wearing but ratter about her ( her would be 90 percent of the cases ) vulnerability . yes is about finding an opportunity but it is more about wanting to feel powerful and i would guess is all about having a really low self stem and wanting to not feel that way but i would guess not in all cases . the second thing i found out i would like to post it as it is so here : Alcohol and/or other drug uses is frequently involved in rape. In 47% of rapes, both the victim and the perpetrator had been drinking. In 17%, only the perpetrator had been. 7% of the time, only the victim had been drinking. Rapes where neither the victim nor the perpetrator had been drinking were 29% of all rapes ." -> http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071210213150AAKMefV whether this numbers are true or not is irrelevant. The most important factor are not the clothes of the women, but the women themselves. It should be pretty obvious... |
SCARY MONSTER |
Feb 24, 2014 12:30 PM
#55
Immahnoob said: Noldorin said: Is this your personal opinion or the law in your country? Laws about alcohol and drugs likely differ between countries. But I'm pretty sure in most countries if it's proven that a guy has a mental disorder that caused him to commit a crime he may not even go to the jail but be sent to an asylum instead. Surely you can't hold a sane and unsane person responsible for their actions to the same degree? No, it's how the law works everywhere, psychopathic disorder is not an excuse, neither is having taken drugs, it's how it works everywhere. if you are insane and you commit a crime, you will be sent to psychiatry and not to jail. If someone gave the drugs to you without you knowing it, you are innocent. if alcohol is involved, this can lead to a weaker punishment. this is how it works, at least in germany. There is no first world country I am aware of where it works differently. |
Feb 24, 2014 12:31 PM
#56
@Guus Of course you gain nothing, but somebody committing an anger rape does. cabacc2 said: Immahnoob said: Noldorin said: Is this your personal opinion or the law in your country? Laws about alcohol and drugs likely differ between countries. But I'm pretty sure in most countries if it's proven that a guy has a mental disorder that caused him to commit a crime he may not even go to the jail but be sent to an asylum instead. Surely you can't hold a sane and unsane person responsible for their actions to the same degree? No, it's how the law works everywhere, psychopathic disorder is not an excuse, neither is having taken drugs, it's how it works everywhere. if you are insane and you commit a crime, you will be sent to psychiatry and not to jail. If someone gave the drugs to you without you knowing it, you are innocent. if alcohol is involved, this can lead to a weaker punishment. this is how it works, at least in germany. There is no first world country I am aware of where it works differently. I said psychopathic disorder because that's THE ONLY exception. Psychopaths are NOT insane. I wasn't talking about people getting drugged by other people, I'm talking about those that took them themselves. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Feb 24, 2014 12:31 PM
#57
Emnay said: GuusWayne said: Women should be able to wear whatever they want without fear of being raped. The idea that "Oh, she was dressed like a slut, she's asking for it" does make sense, however men should know that raping is wrong. And being drunk or having some mental disorder doesn't make it any less bad.I'm not saying this is the case with all rape but a large percentage of it has the women in revealing clothing. We all have desires and the way women dress these days it's like they want to get raped, it's very provoking. I'd say they have a responsibility in that aspect. I bet feminists would be all over the place if men started exposing half of their dick when walking in public. |
Feb 24, 2014 12:33 PM
#58
I agree with OP |
Feb 24, 2014 12:33 PM
#59
GuusWayne said: cabacc2 said: That's stupid, you gain nothing from inspiring fear into a stranger, it has to do calming your urges. Your research seem baseless.GuusWayne said: I'm not saying this is the case with all rape but a large percentage of it has the women in revealing clothing. We all have desires and the way women dress these days it's like they want to get raped, it's very provoking. I'd say they have a responsibility in that aspect. 1. there is a high percentage of rape cases that are towards children. This already debunks your statement. 2. doing the necessary research is up to you. but.. one time: "i made a small research because i found ur question interesting and found out than first as i thought it is all about domination and wanting to inspire fear in the victim rather than wanting to calm an urge or desire for sex , so therefor raping has little to do with what the person being raped is wearing but ratter about her ( her would be 90 percent of the cases ) vulnerability . yes is about finding an opportunity but it is more about wanting to feel powerful and i would guess is all about having a really low self stem and wanting to not feel that way but i would guess not in all cases . the second thing i found out i would like to post it as it is so here : Alcohol and/or other drug uses is frequently involved in rape. In 47% of rapes, both the victim and the perpetrator had been drinking. In 17%, only the perpetrator had been. 7% of the time, only the victim had been drinking. Rapes where neither the victim nor the perpetrator had been drinking were 29% of all rapes ." -> http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071210213150AAKMefV whether this numbers are true or not is irrelevant. The most important factor are not the clothes of the women, but the women themselves. It should be pretty obvious... Noldorin said: I even read somewhere that all men have more or less a rape instinct. GuusWayne said: cabacc2 said: How did I know there would be atleast one smartass that would point that out to me? You were unfortunately not smart enough to know not to interpret it literally but anyways. Your actions are what matters. a large percentage? you obviously dont know how a lot of rape happens. actually its impossible to "want to get raped" if you want it to happen, its not rape. well... thanks. maybe you should take a closer look to the definition of rape, because the act itself is not the only factor that matters. The second factor is if the act is voluntarily or not. Both need to be fulfilled, otherwise its not rape. again: If the numbers are true doesnt matter. This also isnt my research, I just copied it like 10 minutes ago. I just took it to make this point here clear: "whether this numbers are true or not is irrelevant. The most important factor are not the clothes of the women, but the women themselves." I also disagree with the point that was made in this research. The power and fear thing applys more to rape of children. |
Feb 24, 2014 12:35 PM
#60
If you know something bad might happen to you when you go somewhere, you shouldn't go there. |
Feb 24, 2014 12:37 PM
#61
The clothes matter, a bitch with a short skirt is more likely to get raped than someone who show less skin etc. |
SCARY MONSTER |
Feb 24, 2014 12:37 PM
#62
Immahnoob said: I said psychopathic disorder because that's THE ONLY exception. Psychopaths are NOT insane. Honestly, I am not an expert when it comes to whether a certain state of mind should be pathologized or not. I am not a fan of pathologizing though. Immahnoob said: I wasn't talking about people getting drugged by other people, I'm talking about those that took them themselves. well, in this case they are responsible of course. GuusWayne said: The clothes matter, a bitch with a short skirt is more likely to get raped than someone who show less skin etc. It can strengthen the urge, but the most important factor will remain the woman itself, not the clothing. Why does a high percentage of rape happen at work or even more at home? Not because of the clothing, I can assure you that. Mod Edit: double post merged. |
ThangLongFeb 25, 2014 10:08 AM
Feb 24, 2014 12:56 PM
#63
GuusWayne said: The clothes matter, a bitch with a short skirt is more likely to get raped than someone who show less skin etc. And why exactly is someone who wears a short skirt a 'bitch'? That's an incredibly stupid thing to say. |
"If you love someone Follow your heart Cause love comes once If you’re lucky enough" |
Feb 24, 2014 12:59 PM
#64
GuusWayne said: The clothes matter, a bitch with a short skirt is more likely to get raped than someone who show less skin etc. proof. |
Proud founder of the 20+ virgins club. Please visit my manga blog for manga updates and more! Mup da doo didda po mo muhfuggen bix nood ^ Need someone who can translate this. Pm me pls. |
Feb 24, 2014 1:01 PM
#65
Immahnoob said: @Guus Of course you gain nothing, but somebody committing an anger rape does. cabacc2 said: Immahnoob said: Noldorin said: Is this your personal opinion or the law in your country? Laws about alcohol and drugs likely differ between countries. But I'm pretty sure in most countries if it's proven that a guy has a mental disorder that caused him to commit a crime he may not even go to the jail but be sent to an asylum instead. Surely you can't hold a sane and unsane person responsible for their actions to the same degree? No, it's how the law works everywhere, psychopathic disorder is not an excuse, neither is having taken drugs, it's how it works everywhere. if you are insane and you commit a crime, you will be sent to psychiatry and not to jail. If someone gave the drugs to you without you knowing it, you are innocent. if alcohol is involved, this can lead to a weaker punishment. this is how it works, at least in germany. There is no first world country I am aware of where it works differently. I said psychopathic disorder because that's THE ONLY exception. Psychopaths are NOT insane. I wasn't talking about people getting drugged by other people, I'm talking about those that took them themselves. So you changed your mind about the alcohol part then? I can understand if drugs don't get a sentence lowering though. It could be said the guy is at fault for using drugs where there are people around in the first place. |
Feb 24, 2014 1:02 PM
#66
Noldorin said: So you changed your mind about alcohol then? I can understand if drugs don't get a sentence lowering though. It could be said the guy is at fault for using drugs where there are people around. I would totally support a law that denies all sentence lowering when alcohol is involved. |
Feb 24, 2014 1:03 PM
#67
Shiratori99 said: developGuusWayne said: The clothes matter, a bitch with a short skirt is more likely to get raped than someone who show less skin etc. proof. |
an egomaniac and a fool |
Feb 24, 2014 1:22 PM
#68
cabacc2 said: Noldorin said: So you changed your mind about alcohol then? I can understand if drugs don't get a sentence lowering though. It could be said the guy is at fault for using drugs where there are people around. I would totally support a law that denies all sentence lowering when alcohol is involved. Actually I'm against alcohol alltogether. But most societies and governments seem to think it's an ok product(there are even adverts of it everywhere) So I can't blame people for using it, the way things are. And I can't hold a drunk guy completely responsible for his actions since alcohol and being drunk are seen as normal/good things. Drugs are seen as pretty much an illegal thing and is shunned by governments so maybe that's what makes the difference. |
Feb 24, 2014 1:25 PM
#69
wubikro said: Why do people want to completely take away responsibility from the victim, What part of VICTIM do you not understand here? |
Click on this. I dare you. | MAL Fantasy Football League | Currently Watching List RWBY Club. RWBY is anime. Deal with it. Visionaries are always mocked by fools. |
Feb 24, 2014 1:51 PM
#70
Noldorin said: So you changed your mind about the alcohol part then? I can understand if drugs don't get a sentence lowering though. It could be said the guy is at fault for using drugs where there are people around in the first place. I didn't change it at all, it's just that I implied it because I talked about drugs and those change your state of mind just like alcohol, a little bit less but still. Mod Edit: quote tower fixed. |
ThangLongFeb 25, 2014 10:06 AM
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Feb 24, 2014 2:09 PM
#71
Immahnoob said: I didn't change it at all, it's just that I implied it because I talked about drugs and those change your state of mind just like alcohol, a little bit less but still. I was asking because cabacc2 said alcohol could cause a sentence lowering(contrary to your previous claim) and you didn't object. I googled the subject and can't find much, that's why I wanted to make things clear. Actually, it doesn't really matter anyway. Alcohol was just a part of an example and it wasn't my main point. |
Feb 24, 2014 2:25 PM
#72
Well Alcohol plays a huge role in it, but most rapes are likely to be by someone you know here are some facts and figures collected from Interpol and a US study on the Issue across the northern hemisphere. Between 62% and 84% of survivors knew their attacker. 8% of men admit committing acts that meet the legal definition of rape or attempted rape. Of these men who committed rape, 84% said that what they did was definitely not rape. More than one in five men report "becoming so sexually aroused that they could not stop themselves from having sex, even though the woman did not consent." 35% of men report at least some degree of likelihood of raping if they could be assured they wouldn't be caught or punished. Sexual assault offenders were substantially more likely than any other category of violent criminal to report experiencing physical or sexual abuse as children. 4% of men answered "yes" to the question "In your lifetime have you been forced to submit to sexual intercourse against your will?" 41% of college women who are raped were virgins at the time. 42% of rape survivors told no one about the rape. 57% of rapes happen on dates. 75% of the men and 55% of the women involved in acquaintance rapes were drinking or taking drugs just before the attack. (1) About 70% of sexual assault survivors reported that they took some form of self-protective action during the crime. The most common technique was to resist by struggling or chase and try to hold the attacker. Of those survivors who took protective action, over half believed it helped the situation, about 1/5 believed that it made the situation worse or simultaneously worse and better. 84% of rape survivors tried unsuccessfully to reason with the man who raped her. 55% of gang rapes on college campuses are committed by fraternities, 40% by sports teams, and 5% by others. Approximately 40% of sexual assaults take place in the survivor's home. About 20% occur in the home of a friend, neighbor, or relative. 10% occur outside, away from home. About 8% take place in parking garages. More than half of all rape and sexual assault incidents occurred within one mile of the survivor's homeor in her home. Now these numbers are of note given how strange it is Of those rapes reported to the police (which is 1/3 or less to begin with), only 16% result in prison sentences. Therefore, approximately 5% of the time, a man who rapes ends up in prison, 95% of the time he does not. 42% of rape survivors had sex again with the rapist. (1) 30% of rape survivors contemplate suicide after the rape. (1) 82% of rape survivors say the rape permanently changed them. (1) The adult pregnancy rate associated with rape is estimated to be 4.7%. I find it of note that it seems to mostly be stuck to the 14-30 age demograph and just the general views from the attacker not seeing it as rape, and the woman even as noted toward the end sleeping with them again. Short of being a social issue it also might play a role biologically. And if the later is true, then that makes the task all the more difficult. |
Feb 24, 2014 2:45 PM
#73
KyuuAL said: Terrible logical flaw.wubikro said: Why do people want to completely take away responsibility from the victim, What part of VICTIM do you not understand here? |
Feb 24, 2014 3:17 PM
#74
I agree with the OP. I think a person can take some precautions like not getting drunk, not going to places with people you don't know, walking alone at night etc. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Feb 24, 2014 5:10 PM
#75
wubikro said: Why do people want to completely take away responsibility from the victim, That's where I stopped reading. There's words for the level of stupidity you hold. I Have not found them yet. You have shit taste in anime, that's the best I've got. |
Feb 24, 2014 5:17 PM
#76
Thebigofan said: But that isn't a stance you can disagree with, it's just a factI agree with the OP. I think a person can take some precautions like not getting drunk, not going to places with people you don't know, walking alone at night etc. "Not being in dangerous situations will decrease dangerous events" I don't see the discussion value besides provoking victim blame |
Want to talk? Club! "Would you like an anti-psychotic?" *Bonus points if you leave a comment about the meaning of my signature.* |
Feb 24, 2014 5:37 PM
#77
>don't walk down dark alleys wearing expensive watches and shoes Totally reasonable advice. >lock your car doors and don't leave your keys inside Quite reasonable. >don't get drunk off your ass and act like a slu- FUCK YOU PATRIARCH DON'T JUDGE ME I DO WHAT I WANT WATEVA WATEVA |
Never forget, that if you post a topic, you're not allowed to post in it yourself, by order of MAL administration. |
Feb 24, 2014 7:10 PM
#78
I am rather disgusted by the amount of victim blaming in this thread. A criminal's lack of self control is not, in any way the responsibility of the victim of their crime. It is very easy to say the drunk chick should not have been so stupid as to get so drunk or leave her drink unsupervised. But is it also so unreasonable to expect that if for some reason you are incapacitated, even be it because you drank too much, to trust the men around you to make sure you are okay instead of raping you? Are you honestly telling me that you expect young women (and men, as it can happen to men too) to go to a party and to never drop their guard as every person there could be a rapist just waiting for them to slip up? Should we be teaching our daughters and sisters that you can not trust men as they are monsters who can't control themselves so women should live in self-imposed cages? You don't see this kind of blame attached to road accident victims. After all, every body knows cars are one of the significant causes of death. Should they have known better than to go driving on a Friday night because that is when the drink drivers are out? Of course not; it is entirely the drink drivers fault and what happened to the victim is a tragedy. So why does everyone say the girl was wearing a skimpy top and so she is partly responsible for getting attacked. Instead of nodding your heads saying yes, yes, I can see how the slut made him lose contol with that short skirt, shouldn't you as men be offended by the presumption that you have so little control just because of that y chromosome? Why would you excuse that behavior in another man when you yourself would exercise self control (I deeply hope)? What exactly constitutes the point where a man loses the point of control anyway? There are women in burkas who get raped. Did she cocktease the man by wearing slutty eyeliner and needed to be put in her place? I bet the rape taught her a lesson in not leading a man on and rejecting him. Clothes are just an excuse instead of the real reasons like hatred of women, low self esteem, no self control, the rush from power and inflicting pain on another person. There aren't even consistent triggers; some go for high self esteem or low self esteem, rejection, beauty or plain. With regards to women are stupid for taking risks with their safety and should follow rules like avoiding alley ways, lock your car doors when driving at night, don't park in deserted car parks etc. Sometimes, you take a chance; there is no street parking, you forget to lock the doors, you are running very late and take a short cut or simply you trust somebody not to take advantage of you who turns out to be not trustworthy at all. In the overwhelming majority of times, it turns out just fine and in all likelihood, it will never happen to you. And you can not tell me that none of you have ever bent the rules a bit, taken a risk or been optimistic that everything would be just fine. Because that is life and usually the consequences, if it does go pear shaped are not as drastic as rape. Nobody goes out thinking their fun is going to end in rape. I had a friend who forgot to lock her car doors one night. When she stopped at a red light, a man ran up, opened the door, grabbed her handbag and ran off. The whole thing was a big shock but it could have been so much worse had he decided to get in the car with her with more than handbag theft in mind. A rape victim made a mistake that is going to haunt them and they will regret it for the rest of their life. Try for a little compassion and understanding for a mistake which was made and place the blame where it belongs, firmly on the perpetrator. Edited to add: I have stuck to the theme of rape against women as this is most common. Rape can and does occur against men too. They get blamed just as much as women and it is all crap too. My arguments apply just as much to the rape of men as it does to women. Simply reverse the genders. |
CottonrabbitFeb 24, 2014 7:21 PM
Feb 24, 2014 8:07 PM
#79
Is that so? Such a long paragraph to state something we all should already know? You have to learn to get to the point. In most rape cases, people should never blame the victim, yes, it would be just fucking stupid, inconsiderate and retarded. This always assuming they are "rape cases", and not consensual sex disguised as rape. Also there is these other cases where the victim put herself (or himself) in danger by doing stupid things and lacking of common sense, but even in these cases would not make sense to say: "she deserved it". Summarizing, blaming the victim is just retarded and doesn't help at all, what for? To stigmatize rape victims and make them not to want to denounce it? It's stupid. Objectively, in most rape cases it's only the rapist's fault and him/her should be severely punished... I could talk about the death penalty and castration, but I don't want to derail the topic. Ugh OP, why do you feel the need to state the obvious? |
Feb 24, 2014 8:11 PM
#80
Can we please stop saying "Develop"... Read this if you want. It's kind of long. If you flame me, just remember that I'm hotter than you, and I will win!!! *flexes* I realize a lot of people are super heated about this so I'll try to be as delicate as possible. If I want a specific job, I will groom my skills, resume, appearance, and attitude for that job. Sometimes, it really wouldn't have mattered what I did, because the boss' son was going to get it anyway. But if I want to better my odds, I have to play a game. Is it fair? Not really. Is it indicative, of how I will perform at the job? Probably not, maybe a little. Does it always work? No. We all make choices. I'm sure most of us will choose how we die without knowing it. We will choose to run up to the store to buy ice cream, get in a wreck, and die. Or maybe choose to walk across the street when we have the green "walk" sign. A drunk driver runs the light and kills us. Or maybe we even end up killing someone else. The point is we choose our path. We choose where we will end up. The only thing we can do after life beats the living s**t out of us, is to endure as best we can. It sucks. It's unfair. It's life. Choices determine our fate. We choose the where, when, why, how, how often etc. This isn't even arguable. Even when you are a child you can choose to disobey. Can we be held responsible for knowing the future? LOL. Obviously, no. But there are paths that we can "scry" into the crystal ball and have a vague idea of where it will go. You can't know a drunk is going to run a red light and kill you. But you can look both ways before crossing the street, right? I have a sister. I tell her all the time to tone it down. She just wants to be stylish, trendy, etc. I tell her it doesn't matter with some things, but you have to be careful. Do you know why? Because I (yes me), know what guys think. I've lived in a college dorm. I view myself as respectful, considerate, and moral. I still have inappropriate thoughts that I have to suppress when I am exposed to certain situations. I have friends that can be completely horrible. But I also know, there are MUCH worse people out there. Should you be able to live however you want. Sure. But guess what? You can't. Because most of world sucks. Period. TLDR You can't control everything, and you surely can't tell the future. But if you don't want to get struck by lighting, it's best not to play golf during a storm in Tampa, Florida =-) |
text27 said: yes if you read the whole thing...robots will only kill the people you put in-front of them so yeah. RandomChampion said: u were that homie in the thong werent u |
Feb 24, 2014 8:16 PM
#81
Jaguer91 said: Is that so? Such a long paragraph to state something we all should already know? You have to learn to get to the point. Unsure if this is this aimed at me or at the OP? |
Feb 24, 2014 8:22 PM
#82
Feb 24, 2014 8:23 PM
#83
Feb 24, 2014 8:29 PM
#84
Jaguer91 said: Cottonrabbit said: Jaguer91 said: Is that so? Such a long paragraph to state something we all should already know? You have to learn to get to the point. Unsure if this is this aimed at me or at the OP? The OP. All good then :D Just wasn't sure as we seemed to agree but I did a long post directly above yours. |
Feb 24, 2014 9:55 PM
#85
why are people associating responsibility and victim. Two differen- okay. No one is trying to Victim Blame. OP is just trying to say it'd be better for women (and some men) make better choices to avoid being raped. Yes, people should have better self-control. However, they don't. So when you say something like " I'm going to wear what I want and people shouldn't rape me because self-control", You look stupid as fuck. >: and people don't read. what's with this most rapes happen at home crap. op was talking about specific situations. |
![]() |
Feb 24, 2014 10:25 PM
#86
Cottonrabbit said: But is it also so unreasonable to expect that if for some reason you are incapacitated, even be it because you drank too much, to trust the men around you to make sure you are okay instead of raping you? When dealing with strangers: Assume the worst, hope for the best. It's (sadly) naive to think someone you don't know will not take advantage of you if he can. |
Proud founder of the 20+ virgins club. Please visit my manga blog for manga updates and more! Mup da doo didda po mo muhfuggen bix nood ^ Need someone who can translate this. Pm me pls. |
Feb 25, 2014 7:36 AM
#87
wubikro said: GuusWayne said: There is little someone can do about rape, it's rape after all, against your will, if the victim could do something about they definitely would but there is no sense in blaming someone who has no power over the situaton. I'm not blaming the victim for the rape. The rapists alone are responsible for the rape, but who's responsible for the victim willingly getting intoxicated past the point of consciousness in a room full of people they hardly know? Doesn't mean the person is asking or deserves to get raped, but they're putting themselves into a position where their chances of being raped are exponentially higher than normal. You're literally VICTIM BLAMING here!!!! Why would someone's first thought when they seen an unconscious girl is to go fuck her without her consent?? That's monster behavior and you're fucking disgusting tbh. |
Feb 25, 2014 7:39 AM
#88
angrygirl said: wubikro said: GuusWayne said: There is little someone can do about rape, it's rape after all, against your will, if the victim could do something about they definitely would but there is no sense in blaming someone who has no power over the situaton. I'm not blaming the victim for the rape. The rapists alone are responsible for the rape, but who's responsible for the victim willingly getting intoxicated past the point of consciousness in a room full of people they hardly know? Doesn't mean the person is asking or deserves to get raped, but they're putting themselves into a position where their chances of being raped are exponentially higher than normal. You're literally VICTIM BLAMING here!!!! Why would someone's first thought when they seen an unconscious girl is to go fuck her without her consent?? That's monster behavior and you're fucking disgusting tbh. are you serious? I love how people start being really irrational when it comes to topics like this. also: watch your language please. |
Feb 25, 2014 7:40 AM
#89
angrygirl said: wubikro said: GuusWayne said: There is little someone can do about rape, it's rape after all, against your will, if the victim could do something about they definitely would but there is no sense in blaming someone who has no power over the situaton. I'm not blaming the victim for the rape. The rapists alone are responsible for the rape, but who's responsible for the victim willingly getting intoxicated past the point of consciousness in a room full of people they hardly know? Doesn't mean the person is asking or deserves to get raped, but they're putting themselves into a position where their chances of being raped are exponentially higher than normal. You're literally VICTIM BLAMING here!!!! Why would someone's first thought when they seen an unconscious girl is to go fuck her without her consent?? That's monster behavior and you're fucking disgusting tbh. I dunno, they're rapists? Lol. |
Feb 25, 2014 9:31 AM
#90
angrygirl said: You're literally VICTIM BLAMING here!!!! Why would someone's first thought when they seen an unconscious girl is to go fuck her without her consent?? That's monster behavior and you're fucking disgusting tbh. I'm not victim blaming. I'm saying victims are responsible for their own actions before the crime even occurs. Or are you saying that criminals should be held responsible for the victims actions before the crime is even committed? |
Feb 25, 2014 10:22 AM
#91
wubikro said: angrygirl said: You're literally VICTIM BLAMING here!!!! Why would someone's first thought when they seen an unconscious girl is to go fuck her without her consent?? That's monster behavior and you're fucking disgusting tbh. I'm not victim blaming. I'm saying victims are responsible for their own actions before the crime even occurs. Or are you saying that criminals should be held responsible for the victims actions before the crime is even committed? So what you're saying... is that you're not saying it's the victim's fault... you're just saying that it's the victim's actions fault? -_- You're not blaming the victim, but you are. which is it? It can't be both... either it's 100% the rapists responsibility for rape, or you are placing some blame on the victim. You can't try to play devil's advocate and say the victim's negligence is why they were raped, and then try to play the good guy and say it's entirely the rapists fault. Or do you not understand the definition of blame? In case you really don't know what it means... " : to find fault with : censure <the right to praise or blame a literary work> 2 a : to hold responsible <they blame me for everything> b : to place responsibility for <blames it on me> — blam·er noun — to blame : at fault : responsible <says he's not to blame for the accident> " By saying that victims irresponsibility was the determining factor in the rape taking place, you ARE placing direct fault on the victim... aka, you are BLAMING VICTIMS. I continue to believe you have good intentions, and just royally suck at getting them across. IF your goal in posting this thread was to spread preventative awareness, then you have failed. It's like telling someone whose child just died what you think they could have done differently that would have prevented it. Is lecturing someone after a traumatizing event going to do anyone in the world any favors? NO! If you are determined to preach safety to women, then leave rape victims out of it, and focus on "what ifs". You really don't understand the weight of your words. I get the feeling some people here do, and are just heartless low lives that don't care. But I think at least OP, you just don't understand that your posts are not only ineffective, they are detrimental to any progress to be made in the way of rape prevention. Think about it this way... let's pretend you have a girlfriend (or if you do, imagine this). She gets raped. Now, she has 2 options... not reporting it and pretending it never happened, dealing with things alone and just trying to forget it.... or reporting it knowing that some people will not believe her, and others will respond to the accusations by calling her a whore, telling her she deserved it, telling her it was her own fault, telling her that her irresponsible decisions brought it on, or that she was partially responsible as you are saying. She knows in that case she will not only still have to deal with it alone, and try to forget it happened, but that she will have a hell to live through as she likely loses her friends and everyone now treats her like a criminal. She not only has to deal with the rape, but with society making her feel like a disgusting human being. There are 2 reasons people do not come forward about rape... fear of the rapist... and fear of the way she will be treated for reporting it. HOW are you helping in this case? HOW does shaming rape victims help any? I'm not just talking about people who have already come out with their situations. I'm talking about the members that are reading this very thread. There are likely several who have been raped, I know for sure at least a couple, and there are likely a few who have never reported it, or have been considering reporting it. WHY would they report it when they know reporting it means facing ridicule such as this? Guess what? What you are saying is the very definition of victim shaming. If you want to help women keep themselves safer, then leave actual rape victims out of it. You don't need to tell us anything, most of us could probably write a book on the topic. So turn your attention to those who have never been through it, in the hopes that they never do. What you are doing is not protecting the innocent, you are attacking them. |
JadeQuetzalFeb 25, 2014 10:28 AM
Feb 25, 2014 10:49 AM
#92
JadeQuetzal said: So what you're saying... is that you're not saying it's the victim's fault... you're just saying that it's the victim's actions fault? -_- You're not blaming the victim, but you are. which is it? It can't be both... either it's 100% the rapists responsibility for rape, or you are placing some blame on the victim. Interesting. I gave this some thought, and my conclusion is the following: when it comes to topics like responsibility, operating with percentage will not work properly. It just confuses everybody, because of the following. I try to explain it properly, but this may be a little difficult to understand, maybe because this is not my first language... Look at this situation. There are two drivers, both are drunk, they end up in a car crash and both die. This could have been avoided if one of the two would have been not drunk. How is the responsibility? You can see driver A and driver B both as autonomous, closed systems (yeah.. physics) that made their decision (drive drunk) independitly from each other. This means they are both fully responsible for what happened. If you look at A, you can say that A was 100% responsible for what happened. If you look at B, you can say B was 100% responsible for what happend. The responsibilitys of the two is independent from each other, because their decisions and actions are independent from each other. This means, taking away the responsibility from one of the two, wont affect the responsibility of the other. You can view a raoe case the same way: A is walks alone through bad neighbourhood at night in a skinny dress = A drives drunk B is in a permanent state of having no morals and is brutal and reckless = B drives drunk the rape = the two cars crash A walking alone and B being a prick without morals are also independent. The moment B sees A, the car crash happened. this is more how the concept of blame works. Its really complicated. whoa. this took me a while. I hope my logic is legit, I literally just came up with this. |
Feb 25, 2014 10:59 AM
#93
angrygirl said: Rapist or not, it'd be alot of peoples thoughts if they see a hot chick unconcious, it's just most people don't act on those urges.You're literally VICTIM BLAMING here!!!! Why would someone's first thought when they seen an unconscious girl is to go fuck her without her consent?? That's monster behavior and you're fucking disgusting tbh. |
SCARY MONSTER |
Feb 25, 2014 11:15 AM
#94
Yea once I saw a female eating a banana in public, and I totally blame her for giving me indecent thoughts to force her to give me a fellatio. Jeez be more responsible women.... |
Feb 25, 2014 11:58 AM
#95
cabacc2 said: A is walks alone through bad neighbourhood at night in a skinny dress = A drives drunk B is in a permanent state of having no morals and is brutal and reckless = B drives drunk the rape = the two cars crash Wow... I'm in a bit of shock that someone would actually compare wearing a tight dress to driving drunk. No, your logic is not legit no matter which language you say it in. Your mind is so warped I don't even know where to start. But as I know most people are not easily swayed on this topic, I am not even bothering to touch on WHY I think women are not to blame. My entire point has been, what's your point in saying all this? Do you believe saying this will actually somehow prevent rape from happening as often? In which case I direct you to go back and read my other comments over.... or do you just enjoy adding mental anguish to someone who has likely already suffered more than you will ever have to, and will continue to for the rest of their lives? What do you hope to achieve by placing blame on rape victims? |
Feb 25, 2014 12:04 PM
#96
JadeQuetzal said: cabacc2 said: A is walks alone through bad neighbourhood at night in a skinny dress = A drives drunk B is in a permanent state of having no morals and is brutal and reckless = B drives drunk the rape = the two cars crash Wow... I'm in a bit of shock that someone would actually compare wearing a tight dress to driving drunk.? I am comparing wearing a tight dress at night while walking alone in a bad neighbourhood to driving drunk, because both raise the chance of the incident to happen exponentially. I dont see how this is illogical. To your other point: I think about it. This may take a while again... If my comments hurt you, I am sorry. I am just trying to deduce logically, and it was never my intend to hurt anybody or to cause mental anguish. btw: women can be rapists too. just sayin. |
Feb 25, 2014 12:08 PM
#97
cabacc2 said: It's illogical because the rapist is the drunk driver in that situation. The woman with the skinny dress is the random pedestrian that gets hit by a car due the fact that an idiot thought it was a good idea to get behind the wheel while intoxicated.I dont see how this is illogical. |
Makomonogatari said: lupadim said: The best part is that you somehow actually exist.And the best part is that no one can prove it wrong |
Feb 25, 2014 12:20 PM
#98
geezdad said: cabacc2 said: It's illogical because the rapist is the drunk driver in that situation. The woman with the skinny dress is the random pedestrian that gets hit by a car due the fact that an idiot thought it was a good idea to get behind the wheel while intoxicated.I dont see how this is illogical. okay. I have to point it out more clearly: Driver A & B both trigger the incident through their behaviour (being drunk) if one of them was not drunk, the incident (car crash) would not have happened. In the rape situation, its not the skinny dress that triggers the incident. its the women walking 1. Alone, 2.At night, 3.In a skinny dress, 4.In a bad neighbourhood. and the rapist being in a permanent state of having no morals and being brutal and reckless. this would be the drunken drivers. If one behaved differently, the incident would not have happened. Your mistake is the following: what the outcome of the situation is, is irrelevant for my analogy. I made it to make the concept of responsibility more clear. Who was responsible for the incident to happen? What the outcome was, is not relevant for this question. |
Feb 25, 2014 12:32 PM
#99
No need to point it out more clearly. Your mistake is the following: Clearly the rapist is the drunk driver and the woman with the skinny dress is the pedestrian. In the drunk driver situation: The pedestrian is walking 1. Alone, 2. At night, 3. Not visible enough, 4. Crossing the road. |
Makomonogatari said: lupadim said: The best part is that you somehow actually exist.And the best part is that no one can prove it wrong |
Feb 25, 2014 12:33 PM
#100
So basically, what people are saying is. If you don't want to get raped, don't drink ever, don't go out at night, never meet new people and never wear skimpy clothes. Now I'm very sure there are places in the world, where women can't do any of the above things, and I'm fairly sure that rape still happens in those places. What you want to do is take away any kind of freedom that women have by blaming them for when a man can't control himself. Well, I have a very simply solution to this, how about men are no longer allowed to drink alcohol? You're so determined to blame women for getting drunk, wearing a style of clothes. So why don't we just go ahead and do the same and blame men for not being able to control themselves while drunk, why is women's responsibility while drunk in question, while men's isn't? So let's ban men from ever touching alcohol, or going out at night, if men aren't out at night, how could they rape someone. Seems like a perfectly fair argument right? There is so much sexism about this subject and I'm convinced that most of you just don't care at all, even a small bit about those people that are raped, you've got people early on this thread calling women who wear skimpy outfits 'bitches', even though he knows nothing about them at all, and this attitude does exist, people think those women deserve it because apparently what someone wears is there personality, and the person who raped them was clearly someone she had treated badly so she was 'asking' for it. This whole attitude is disgusting. I hope one day you realise just how disgusting it is and you feel ashamed of yourselves. |
"If you love someone Follow your heart Cause love comes once If you’re lucky enough" |
More topics from this board
» Do you think some people actually found true love on MAL?Zakatsuki_ - Sep 19 |
22 |
by Little_Sheepling
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» Things that your imagination made you scared of as a kid but wasn't actually scaryTheBlockernator - 12 hours ago |
7 |
by LoveYourSmile
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» if you could switch places right now with your past self, when would it be and why?angel0_pr4t - Sep 27 |
10 |
by RainyEvenings
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» Have you ever done any mischief in your younger years that your family is still unaware of to this day?fleurbleue - Oct 10 |
19 |
by XMGA030
»»
28 minutes ago |
|
» Evidence self driving cars are safe. Thoughts?Freshell - Oct 3 |
47 |
by LoveYourSmile
»»
35 minutes ago |