Do you agree with the above user's opinion?

_henri said:
Using "pretentious" as a criticism is such a simpleton fodder argument. It basically means that you don't like the anime but cannot identify why it is actually flawed, so you plead ignorance instead of creating a concrete argument. Pretentious means: "attempting to impress by affecting greater importance, talent, culture, etc., than is actually possessed." Unless an anime is explicitly saying "this anime is culturally important," you cannot criticize it as being pretentious since an anime never claimed to be more important than it is. Stick to the basic objective metrics such as characters, setting, story, plot, themes, tone, art, sound, etc. Those are what you can concretely criticize instead of saying an anime is bad for being ambitious. Heck, you can even say "an anime tried to be too ambitious that it failed to adequately execute its fundamental parts" and that would be a valid criticism. Other technical details that you can criticize instead of saying "it's pretentious" include: "is dialogue realistic?", "is there too much suspension of disbelief?", "is the directing rational?", etc. However, the "it's pretentious" argument is just lazy.