New
Jan 31, 2014 3:49 AM
#101
Well, who else is there to do their job? Shouldn't that be the more major problem, in this case? Also, Article said: Other things Miyazaki doesn't like include: Abe Administration, the Iraq War, and the iPad, for which he compared the gestures to masturbation Wut? |
yhunataJan 31, 2014 4:36 AM
Jan 31, 2014 4:34 AM
#102
He implied about the animation, which I believe it's true. But if we talking about the "moe" itself, it's half bullshit. Things like this will always happen. Are you going to say the endless shounens with big fanbase isn't the same bullshit as unrealistic moe ? If we had a industry with only drama, people would complain about drama. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 31, 2014 5:29 AM
#103
He's referring to the animation. Does he mean animation should emulate real-life and not over-exaggerate human movements, at least the ones not meant for comedy effect? |
Jan 31, 2014 5:36 AM
#104
The problem is Otaku who like bad shit like Infinite Stratos. |
Jan 31, 2014 5:55 AM
#105
xJapaliicious said: He implied about the animation, which I believe it's true. But if we talking about the "moe" itself, it's half bullshit. Things like this will always happen. Are you going to say the endless shounens with big fanbase isn't the same bullshit as unrealistic moe ? If we had a industry with only drama, people would complain about drama. I don't think Miyazaki is this superficial, I think he meant the character and story being too cliche and uninteresting. |
"After I finish fucking you. I am going to kill you." |
Jan 31, 2014 6:03 AM
#106
zetsubousei_hero said: Japanese definition of otaku is not the english interpretation of it. In all likelihood, you are not an otaku, so are not most of the anime fans outside of japan.http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interest/2014-01-30/miyazaki/the-problem-with-the-anime-industry-is-it-full-of-otaku I just want my fellow otaku opinion on it whether you agree or disagree. For me I think the industry need otaku to survive. To answer the question though, maybe. Indeed otaku tends to buy a lot of anime, which finance the industry. However, they tend to buy the moe/fanservice type of anime, purchases that steer the industry toward the less intelligent direction. Overall, existence of otaku is the fundamental targeting demographics of anime, but it also is the cause of overdone fanservice being commonplace. edit: otaku in the actual industry can stay at their job because they know what otaku needs. It is the same question. |
My Reviews and Rants: http://bunny1ov3r.wordpress.com/ 痛就是爱 |
Jan 31, 2014 6:25 AM
#107
Haven't read the posts here cuz ain't got no time fo dat. But gonna chime in with my thoughts anyway I think a lot of people misinterpreted what he meant to say. At least on FB they did. Dunno about here. What he, in my opinion, refers to when he used the word 'otaku' are the people who are socially awkward, do not have the urge/will to interact with real people of the real world and instead choose to spend most of their time with gal games or just watch a lot of anime in general. People who are a part of the anime industry needs creators that possess real life experience - experience with people, with how their mind works, what makes them tick etc. Understanding how other people around you react to situations in real life is instrumental in knowing what is more likely to affect them or tug at their heart strings. If all you do is isolate yourself from the real world, you won't be able to create things that are effectively appealing to a lot of people. Because you just lack the knowledge/experience to understand what they'd like. You can make mindless hentai or stories with no substance (thanks to lack of experience when it comes to situations in the world outside), but that isn't what the industry needs. That is what I got out of his comment. |
Jan 31, 2014 7:00 AM
#108
Zalis said: To anyone who thinks that otaku/moe anime is ruining the industry by crowding out other types of anime, I ask you this: how many legitimate releases of serious/mature/psychological/horror/whatever have you purchased? How many very good ones have been made recently? This is a two-way thing. You can't just pin the blame on the audience when interesting ideas get shot down before they reach the drawing board because they're not commercially viable enough. It's valid to put the industry's feet to the fire. Anyway. Quality knows no genre. This dichotomy of "cutesy garbage vs serious mature shows" is stupid because some of the best anime of the 80s was undeniably pretty cutesy, and plenty of dark, serious shows pander to sensibilities no deeper than a harem show does. That's what the problem is: commercial pandering with nothing else going on creatively. Miyazaki has a point, but I question the idea that his one-dimensional Jesus-like female protagonists are somehow deeper than an anime that happens to have exploitation elements. |
GodAndTheBearJan 31, 2014 7:08 AM
Jan 31, 2014 7:05 AM
#109
bunny_lover said: zetsubousei_hero said: Japanese definition of otaku is not the english interpretation of it. In all likelihood, you are not an otaku, so are not most of the anime fans outside of japan.http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interest/2014-01-30/miyazaki/the-problem-with-the-anime-industry-is-it-full-of-otaku I just want my fellow otaku opinion on it whether you agree or disagree. For me I think the industry need otaku to survive. To answer the question though, maybe. Indeed otaku tends to buy a lot of anime, which finance the industry. However, they tend to buy the moe/fanservice type of anime, purchases that steer the industry toward the less intelligent direction. Overall, existence of otaku is the fundamental targeting demographics of anime, but it also is the cause of overdone fanservice being commonplace. edit: otaku in the actual industry can stay at their job because they know what otaku needs. It is the same question. True. It can be both a good and a bad thing. |
Jan 31, 2014 7:06 AM
#110
I like Miyazaki. |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2014 8:34 AM
#111
SeibaaHomu said: An old man complaining about the modern anime industry? What else is new? |
"The mind is better off free, rather than in chains." -Anonymous |
Jan 31, 2014 8:43 AM
#112
Stopped reading after he compared the gestures of a tablet to masturbation. This guy should stick to his field. |
Aliis si licet, tibi non licet. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:01 AM
#113
Forgetfulness said: Largething said: I know there were a couple anime that were considered more "serious" in the past like 2 years such asZalis said: To anyone who thinks that otaku/moe anime is ruining the industry by crowding out other types of anime, I ask you this: how many legitimate releases of serious/mature/psychological/horror/whatever have you purchased? How many very good ones have been made recently? This is a two-way thing. You can't just pin the blame on the audience when interesting ideas get shot down before they reach the drawing board because they're not commercially viable enough. It's valid to put the industry's feet to the fire. Anyway. Quality knows no genre. This dichotomy of "cutesy garbage vs serious mature shows" is stupid because some of the best anime of the 80s was undeniably pretty cutesy, and plenty of dark, serious shows pander to sensibilities no deeper than a harem show does. That's what the problem is: commercial pandering with nothing else going on creatively. Miyazaki has a point, but I question the idea that his one-dimensional Jesus-like female protagonists are somehow deeper than an anime that happens to have exploitation elements. Steins;Gate, Fate/Zero, Psycho-Pass, Madoka Magica there are undoubtedly more, but I haven't seen them so I can't make a judgement on them I don't think that exactly need to be serious, but we had many great names this last 4 years: Steins;Gate Fate/Zero Psycho-Pass Madoka Magica Durarara!! Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood Shinsekai Yori Hataraku Maou-sama! Ore no Seishun LoveCome wa Machigatteiru Ookami Kodomo no Ame to Yuki Hyouka not forgetting that I don't remember everything I also like the fact we have many "bad animes", because we can discern the good ones after this fact. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:15 AM
#114
Higashi_no_Kaze said: I like Miyazaki. I do too, but that doesn't mean he's always right. Anime has grown a lot since his heyday in my opinion, for better or worse depending who you ask. All things degrade over time as ideas run out, technical aspects increase, etc in my opinion. It's happened to a few media types already. That's what I feel is holding the industry back at times. How many interesting concepts/stories have been shot down because they wouldn't turn in enough money? I used to be an avid PC gamer, and video games have hit the same block. If it doesn't produce enough money, it's likely never going to be made. In it's place will be something similar to what's been made already, albeit a different plot mechanic or storyline element thrown in. There are exceptions of course, but most of the time I feel that is how things end up. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:17 AM
#115
xJapaliicious said: I don't think that exactly need to be serious, but we had many great names this last 4 years: I think that serious is meant approximately as 'with actual meaning', in this case, so: Steins;Gate - moelite, SF dramaschlock Fate/Zero - i'll give you this Psycho-Pass - superficially quote me harder Madoka Magica - too condensed Durarara!! Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood Shinsekai Yori Hataraku Maou-sama!- derivative as anything Ore no Seishun LoveCome wa Machigatteiru - barely Ookami Kodomo no Ame to Yuki - haven't seen Hyouka - cutesy moe "not forgetting that I don't remember everything" - because there isn't much to remember! dohohohoho. (I jest.) But clearly, the masterpiece sect would gladly take that list to the furnace. xJapaliicious said: Well good thing the government screws up all the time, that way we can at least tell when they're doing things right!I also like the fact we have many "bad animes", because we can discern the good ones after this fact. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:20 AM
#116
Ckan said: Steins;Gate - moelite, SF dramaschlock Stopped there. I had to laugh |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:21 AM
#117
He is completely right. Even most of the "better" and popular series in the past years were riddled with dumb tropes (Steins;Gate, F/Z and all the other stuff from T/M and Key) whereas series like Hyougo Mono or Kyousogiga barely find an audience. xJapaliicious said: Ckan said: Steins;Gate - moelite, SF dramaschlock Stopped there. I had to laugh Feyris-nyan, Makise being a 2channer, Okabe being a chuunis elfinsert, blatant Akibahara wanking, etc. It IS full of otaku tropes. |
Jojolion anime when? |
Jan 31, 2014 9:23 AM
#118
Nidhoeggr said: I doubt you understood half of the theory.xJapaliicious said: Ckan said: Steins;Gate - moelite, SF dramaschlock Stopped there. I had to laugh Feyris-nyan, Makise being a 2channer, Okabe being a chuunis elfinsert, blatant Akibahara wanking, etc. It IS full of otaku tropes. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:24 AM
#119
xJapaliicious said: Forget that I ever took you seriously. Ad hominem strongk.Nidhoeggr said: I doubt you understood half of the theory.xJapaliicious said: Ckan said: Steins;Gate - moelite, SF dramaschlock Stopped there. I had to laugh Feyris-nyan, Makise being a 2channer, Okabe being a chuunis elfinsert, blatant Akibahara wanking, etc. It IS full of otaku tropes. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:24 AM
#120
xJapaliicious said: Nidhoeggr said: I doubt you understood half of the theory.xJapaliicious said: Ckan said: Steins;Gate - moelite, SF dramaschlock Stopped there. I had to laugh Feyris-nyan, Makise being a 2channer, Okabe being a chuunis elfinsert, blatant Akibahara wanking, etc. It IS full of otaku tropes. He's got shit taste, that's why he quoted exactly that in his post sign. |
Aliis si licet, tibi non licet. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:24 AM
#121
xJapaliicious said: Nidhoeggr said: I doubt you understood half of the theory.xJapaliicious said: Ckan said: Steins;Gate - moelite, SF dramaschlock Stopped there. I had to laugh Feyris-nyan, Makise being a 2channer, Okabe being a chuunis elfinsert, blatant Akibahara wanking, etc. It IS full of otaku tropes. Of what? Of the dumb timetravel bullshit? Sure... stick to your harem and ecchi tropes, complete with traps, otaku references that are oh-so-witty and a loser protagonist you can relate to. I prefer good series. I have yet to find a recent LN/VN that is on par with actual literature in quality. If the industry evolves around otakus quality will degrade even further as the vicious cycle of dependence continues. CkanForget said: that I ever took you seriously. Ad hominem strongk. If I liked most modern LN/VN I'd resort to ad hominem as well - it's hard to rationalize liking them :P |
NidhoeggrJan 31, 2014 9:35 AM
Jojolion anime when? |
Jan 31, 2014 9:26 AM
#122
Aylaine said: Higashi_no_Kaze said: I like Miyazaki. I do too, but that doesn't mean he's always right. Anime has grown a lot since his heyday in my opinion, for better or worse depending who you ask. All things degrade over time as ideas run out, technical aspects increase, etc in my opinion. It's happened to a few media types already. That's what I feel is holding the industry back at times. How many interesting concepts/stories have been shot down because they wouldn't turn in enough money? I used to be an avid PC gamer, and video games have hit the same block. If it doesn't produce enough money, it's likely never going to be made. In it's place will be something similar to what's been made already, albeit a different plot mechanic or storyline element thrown in. There are exceptions of course, but most of the time I feel that is how things end up. Isn't that part of what he said? I'm confused regarding to the relevance of my quote to your post. Anyway, I find it likeable that he criticizes anime from otakus for otakus and also that he seems to dislike the IPad. But I don't think that things in the 80's were much different from what you've described. Only back then money was made mostly with TV ratings and not BD sales, so the series were longer and aimed at broader audiences and generally had different requirements for success compared to most modern Late-night shows. Because of the developments from TV to Latenight anime some genres/styles have almost died out, but overall the variety has increased a lot because the output has increased a lot. So while I'm not happy with the number of Otaku pandering series coming out each season, I can't honestly say the variety modern anime offers has declined because of it. |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:28 AM
#123
Steins;Gate was damn entertaining and enjoyable, but denying that it's filled to the brim with stuff pandering to Otakus is just showing hard denial... |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:33 AM
#125
dblbch said: Miyazaki is a douche. He only speaks the harsh truth. |
Jojolion anime when? |
Jan 31, 2014 9:35 AM
#126
Higashi_no_Kaze said: Steins;Gate was damn entertaining and enjoyable, but denying that it's filled to the brim with stuff pandering to Otakus is just showing hard denial... ^ This. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:36 AM
#127
Higashi_no_Kaze said: I didn't denied, but stating those are the strong points of the anime is a flaw.Steins;Gate was damn entertaining and enjoyable, but denying that it's filled to the brim with stuff pandering to Otakus is just showing hard denial... |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:42 AM
#128
xJapaliicious said: Higashi_no_Kaze said: I didn't denied, but stating those are the strong points of the anime is a flaw.Steins;Gate was damn entertaining and enjoyable, but denying that it's filled to the brim with stuff pandering to Otakus is just showing hard denial... Maybe not, but I'd say it's a big part of why the series is so widely popular compared to other sci-fi anime that have less or no pandering to those audiences. In Japan AND in the west. And just by saying that they are not the strong points of the anime you don't deny that it could have been better without it, which is what the others were implying, I think. |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:44 AM
#129
Hoppy said: A genocide on otaku and moe would destroy anime itself, wipe out close to 40% of the current LN market and slightly affect the manga market but not destroy it (since Moe doesn't make a high percentage of manga). And that is supposed to be a bad thing? With the quality of most modern anime and LN: Go ahead, get rid of all the shit! i'd rather watch only three excellent anime than 40 bad ones per season and nobody except lonely virgins needs imouto/harem/ecchi LNs. Higashi_no_Kaze said: Maybe not, but I'd say it's a big part of why the series is so widely popular compared to other sci-fi anime that have less or no pandering to those audiences. In Japan AND in the west. And just by saying that they are not the strong points of the anime you don't deny that it could have been better without it, which is what the others were implying, I think. Exactly. |
NidhoeggrJan 31, 2014 9:48 AM
Jojolion anime when? |
Jan 31, 2014 9:45 AM
#130
Higashi_no_Kaze said: Good point, I agree.xJapaliicious said: Higashi_no_Kaze said: I didn't denied, but stating those are the strong points of the anime is a flaw.Steins;Gate was damn entertaining and enjoyable, but denying that it's filled to the brim with stuff pandering to Otakus is just showing hard denial... Maybe not, but I'd say it's a big part of why the series is so widely popular compared to other sci-fi anime that have less or no pandering to those audiences. In Japan AND in the west. And just by saying that they are not the strong points of the anime you don't deny that it could have been better without it, which is what the others were implying, I think. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:48 AM
#131
I agree. I want more good stuff rather than cash grab anime made to pander to otaku. Less anime about highschool and less anime about cute girls doing cute things please. Interesting that otakus are within the industry too. JustALEX said: I've never heard of this guy.... He's the creator of Spirited Away, Howl's Moving Castle, Ponyo, Princess Mononoke, and many other award winning anime films. |
Jan 31, 2014 9:54 AM
#132
Battlechili1 said: I'll be the first to say that these two things are not inherently bad.Less anime about highschool and less anime about cute girls doing cute things please. The issue is a mix of unadventurous studios, a difficult market environment, and an increase in 'incestuous' and self-referential stories, coupled with a heavy reliance on adapting said more of said works. Essentially, a level of 'decay' in the industry that has become to a detrimental degree, set in its ways. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:10 AM
#133
Ckan said: Battlechili1 said: I'll be the first to say that these two things are not inherently bad.Less anime about highschool and less anime about cute girls doing cute things please. The issue is a mix of unadventurous studios, a difficult market environment, and an increase in 'incestuous' and self-referential stories, coupled with a heavy reliance on adapting said more of said works. Essentially, a level of 'decay' in the industry that has become to a detrimental degree, set in its ways. I think I big factor is that the average episode count has gone down since the transition to Late-Night anime and along with that came the development that a lot of anime are really only intended as advertisements/previews for the LN or manga or game they are adapting. It's pretty rare to see a 13 or even 26 episodes series being a really completed adaption of anything (Anime originals are a different story). That's what makes F/Z or SSY stand out (amongst other factors). And I also think it is connected to the complainsts of many people that certain genres are taking over and others are disappearing. For some rom-com, s-o-l or gag anime it just doesn't matter that much if the adaption is cut off after 13 episodes, but if that happens for more plot-orientated genres it results in a complete fail more often than not (think Zetman or Code:Breaker for example). |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:20 AM
#134
Higashi_no_Kaze said: Definitely. Between reliance on BD sales and the constant 1-2 cour adaptions of preexisting works, means there's just a huge increase in the appeal of adapting the popular, often unfinished and trope-heavy fan-appealing works.I think I big factor is that the average episode count has gone down since the transition to Late-Night anime and along with that came the development that a lot of anime are really only intended as advertisements/previews for the LN or manga or game they are adapting. It's pretty rare to see a 13 or even 26 episodes series being a really completed adaption of anything (Anime originals are a different story). That's what makes F/Z or SSY stand out (amongst other factors). And I also think it is connected to the complainsts of many people that certain genres are taking over and others are disappearing. For some rom-com, s-o-l or gag anime it just doesn't matter that much if the adaption is cut off after 13 episodes, but if that happens for more plot-orientated genres it results in a complete fail more often than not (think Zetman or Code:Breaker for example). On the other hand, I feel that Zetman was always a hard adaptation to make, given the nature of its 'mature' content. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:24 AM
#135
well now i know why all of his anime movies suck ass this guy churns out the worst product like a yugo factory in soviet union. this guy is lucky that we otakus exist to buy his garbage and make him a millionaire (well, the lesser otakus do at least, ive only bought berserk) this guy is a traitor to the anime industry-otaku complex. guy talks about observing 3d people and then goes on to make bogus ass 2d films with pansy characters, and lame story lines for 5-year-old kids. what a joke |
Jan 31, 2014 10:34 AM
#136
I'm still trying to understand how he connected iPads to gestures of masturbation. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:35 AM
#137
yhunata said: I'm still trying to understand how he connected iPads to gestures of masturbation. Don't sweat the details, the important thing here is that he dislikes IPads and I do too so we're buddies now. |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:38 AM
#138
Higashi_no_Kaze said: Ckan said: Battlechili1 said: I'll be the first to say that these two things are not inherently bad.Less anime about highschool and less anime about cute girls doing cute things please. The issue is a mix of unadventurous studios, a difficult market environment, and an increase in 'incestuous' and self-referential stories, coupled with a heavy reliance on adapting said more of said works. Essentially, a level of 'decay' in the industry that has become to a detrimental degree, set in its ways. I think I big factor is that the average episode count has gone down since the transition to Late-Night anime and along with that came the development that a lot of anime are really only intended as advertisements/previews for the LN or manga or game they are adapting. It's pretty rare to see a 13 or even 26 episodes series being a really completed adaption of anything (Anime originals are a different story). That's what makes F/Z or SSY stand out (amongst other factors). And I also think it is connected to the complainsts of many people that certain genres are taking over and others are disappearing. For some rom-com, s-o-l or gag anime it just doesn't matter that much if the adaption is cut off after 13 episodes, but if that happens for more plot-orientated genres it results in a complete fail more often than not (think Zetman or Code:Breaker for example). Fate/Zero was adapted from the novels. |
Aliis si licet, tibi non licet. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:39 AM
#139
yhunata said: I'm still trying to understand how he connected iPads to gestures of masturbation. if youve watched any of his movies, youd know that similia and metaphors arent his strong suit, as it all carries into his narrative devices |
Jan 31, 2014 10:39 AM
#140
Higashi_no_Kaze said: I used to hate Ipads until I got around to playing around with one.yhunata said: I'm still trying to understand how he connected iPads to gestures of masturbation. Don't sweat the details, the important thing here is that he dislikes IPads and I do too so we're buddies now. If you know what I mean. sherlock5545 said: He never said they weren't...Fate/Zero was adapted from the novels. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:45 AM
#141
sherlock5545 said: Higashi_no_Kaze said: Ckan said: Battlechili1 said: I'll be the first to say that these two things are not inherently bad.Less anime about highschool and less anime about cute girls doing cute things please. The issue is a mix of unadventurous studios, a difficult market environment, and an increase in 'incestuous' and self-referential stories, coupled with a heavy reliance on adapting said more of said works. Essentially, a level of 'decay' in the industry that has become to a detrimental degree, set in its ways. I think I big factor is that the average episode count has gone down since the transition to Late-Night anime and along with that came the development that a lot of anime are really only intended as advertisements/previews for the LN or manga or game they are adapting. It's pretty rare to see a 13 or even 26 episodes series being a really completed adaption of anything (Anime originals are a different story). That's what makes F/Z or SSY stand out (amongst other factors). And I also think it is connected to the complainsts of many people that certain genres are taking over and others are disappearing. For some rom-com, s-o-l or gag anime it just doesn't matter that much if the adaption is cut off after 13 episodes, but if that happens for more plot-orientated genres it results in a complete fail more often than not (think Zetman or Code:Breaker for example). Fate/Zero was adapted from the novels. I didn't mean to say it was original, I meant to say that it's a completed adaption. Novels usually get that courtesy, unlike LN or manga adaptions (SSY was also adapted from a novel). |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:47 AM
#142
My bad, but the way you wrote that implied they were, as you transitioned from anime originals to Fate/Zero and Shinsekai. |
Aliis si licet, tibi non licet. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:50 AM
#143
It's about getting cash. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:51 AM
#144
Miyazaki is a hater lol... But in all honesty, it's understandable that you need to get to know people if you want to write. However I still like my animes and I don't really care about what he thinks. |
Jan 31, 2014 10:58 AM
#145
sherlock5545 said: My bad, but the way you wrote that implied they were, as you transitioned from anime originals to Fate/Zero and Shinsekai. No Problem, I saw where the misunderstanding came from when I reread my post after your reply. |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2014 11:30 AM
#146
The problem with anime currently is the business model, IMO. Buying BDs isn't necessarily a bad thing, it can be great, but placing it as the number one source of income isn't exactly ideal for some anime. Take Symphogear. Plot is bland, but the experience is enjoyable. Why? Songs. Doesn't give fucks about disks, plays by it's strength. What is the results? 30k per song singles in each season's soundtrack, some going up to 80k. Another issue is the blandness as some of the guys have expressed. Most of the seasons currently are filled with high school stuff. I like high school stuff, but at some point, you're gonna get sick of it (And then like it again after the fatigues are gone but you get my point). Not to mention that most of those anime are poorly executed. There have been shows that are different than your usual anime each season. I take Shingeki for example. It is different! I'm not saying that it's a "masterpiece", that is for subjectivity to decide, but nonetheless different. Same goes for OreGairu, not your average high school anime. Those are some of examples of different anime which do well financially. Personally, I blame Japanese TV stations. I read somewhere, maybe Wikipedia or animenewsnetwork's article about how to make anime, that around 2000, TV stations are rich enough to start live-action shows and most don't fund for anime no more, leading to the rise of production committees. Maybe that's why most of the current time anime are bland? IMO, Japanese Stations should have stuck to what they do best which got them recognition around the world. Koreans have their Dramas; The West has the money for expensive live action movies and shows. To this day, what is Japan known for entertainment wise? Manga, LNs, Hatsune Miku and Anime. As a solution to the blandness, I think Japan should have a Netflix-like streaming service for anime. It can run on advertisement money or subscription fees. Nico Nico Douga should do it: Slaps the advertisement model onto streaming anime and divide the revenue to the production committees and itself. Solid revenue => More money/less risk => Encouragement for studios to take risks => More variety/more quality => People won't blame/bitch about otakus no more and leave them be. |
Jan 31, 2014 11:32 AM
#147
Higashi_no_Kaze said: Isn't that part of what he said? I'm confused regarding to the relevance of my quote to your post. Anyway, I find it likeable that he criticizes anime from otakus for otakus and also that he seems to dislike the IPad. But I don't think that things in the 80's were much different from what you've described. Only back then money was made mostly with TV ratings and not BD sales, so the series were longer and aimed at broader audiences and generally had different requirements for success compared to most modern Late-night shows. Because of the developments from TV to Latenight anime some genres/styles have almost died out, but overall the variety has increased a lot because the output has increased a lot. So while I'm not happy with the number of Otaku pandering series coming out each season, I can't honestly say the variety modern anime offers has declined because of it. It's part of what he said to a degree, but he also has points I disagreed with. Mainly what's wrong with the industry. I don't feel it's a group of people who are to blame for example. I have to disagree though. Just like other mediums of entertainment back then, they had to begin somewhere. I really believe that back then, ideas felt fresh & new because the industry was still relatively small compared to what it is now. A lot hadn't been done yet, or was at it's very basic level. Once the similar shows start cropping up, many consumers will simply buy what's familiar, rather then what's new. Video Games are facing the exact same problem. Could they make something more original? Definitely, but if it doesn't sell well, or is projected to go that path, how much backing will it get? Will it be enough? Time has eroded the anime industry in my opinion. Every now and then you get a good series that is different or really tries to be, but ultimately...a good portion of the anime I end up watching feels very similar to earlier shows I've watched, just with something different added to it in order to give viewers a sense of diversity. So I must disagree with you on that part. Variety increasing is a good thing, but once a show becomes big, it will be emulated because others want to cash in on that success too. |
Jan 31, 2014 1:19 PM
#148
xJapaliicious said: I don't think that exactly need to be serious, but we had many great names this last 4 years: Steins;Gate Fate/Zero Psycho-Pass Madoka Magica Durarara!! Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood Shinsekai Yori Hataraku Maou-sama! Ore no Seishun LoveCome wa Machigatteiru Ookami Kodomo no Ame to Yuki Hyouka not forgetting that I don't remember everything I also like the fact we have many "bad animes", because we can discern the good ones after this fact. These are exactly the bad stuff. They only appear good to the nerds who have developed a tunnel vision towards anime and are missing the forest from the trees, so to speak. They are not good shows for normal people. Wolf Kids (and maybe FMAB in a way) is an exception, but it hardly stands up to the classic anime film. |
Jan 31, 2014 1:19 PM
#149
Anyone offended by Miyazaki's comment -- you're part of the problem. Suck it, Weebs! |
Click on this. I dare you. | MAL Fantasy Football League | Currently Watching List RWBY Club. RWBY is anime. Deal with it. Visionaries are always mocked by fools. |
More topics from this board
» Random small things in anime you enjoyTheBlockernator - Oct 17 |
15 |
by ItachiDeltaForce
»»
9 minutes ago |
|
» Best references to american media in Anime (or other japanese media)TheBlockernator - Yesterday |
17 |
by Lucifrost
»»
12 minutes ago |
|
» My top 5 favorite (and least favorite) protagonists in anime and mangaTheFlyingSoda - 2 hours ago |
10 |
by TheFlyingSoda
»»
14 minutes ago |
|
» Have you ever thought about making videos?DinoPapiro - Yesterday |
15 |
by Maou_heika
»»
22 minutes ago |
|
» Which anime character has the most annoying voice? ( 1 2 )Jonas-K - Sep 1, 2023 |
63 |
by Maou_heika
»»
26 minutes ago |