if generative ai art becomes good enough would you watch a fan made one punch man anime remake using this ai technology?

no you can't match the creativity lile 1st season!! even you use most advanced ai..?
there won't be meaning to the vision of a animator..??
look at fast phased action scenes it can't be matched by ai

@deg
i think if it used properly by experienced animators they can create anime with ai by partially animating by ai and hand drawn from the vision
it could happen in future definitely!!!

No! Even if the animation looks bad at least it had some kind of effort put into it!

a real art enjoyer always speaks ill of ai generated "art"

@StarBloom_64

no im implying art to me is either philosophy (like religion, human soul or human spirit, etc) or simply entertainment and i stick with arts as entertainment

Well, even in art are exceptions as you stated. For me, this type of lazy modern art falls into the same low category as ai "art" .

Yes I would and I feel like it'd be less than a 'few' years. Most people saying they wouldn't would likely as well, whether it be them caving in or simply because of curiosity.

I normally wouldn't post this since it might draw out political posters but one of the better examples of recent (2 weeks ago) I've seen is an anime music video using US politics/memes (Trump, Elon, youtubers, etc.) made with AI and honestly, ignoring the theme, it looks great for a lot of the anime stuff it does.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWZYP5jn5w4

This question is sad frfr. If we begin outsourcing human creativity, humans themselves start to become unnecessary. The broader implication of accepting AI generated content and its proliferation is to be accepting of humans becoming obsolete. The only thing that makes humans special in this world is our brains. If we outsource our intelligence for the things that truly make us human, like art, we’ll stop creating entirely and become purely consumers, reliant on ai to create for us. In a capitalist society, human artists can’t compete with AI that’s trained on their output to begin with. That’s bleak… and I think if you’d be happy with stuff like that we disagree at a fundamental level. Getting good content is far less important to me than the fact that it was made by a real person.

This season is so fucking bad that it has led to people hoping ai is used in anime lmao

I would, if it's at least close to the quality of the first season.

Even setting up the right prompts require having talent (mainly for artistic vision).

In the hands of untalented/uninspired people, even using the greatest AI tool would produce bad product.

Yes, typing up a few random words and expecting a machine to do it perfectly is "having talent". Good one. I bet it took a surreal amount of talent to write this too.

AI is the cancer of recent years. I'd rather watch nothing than something like this.

@Jollyne7 So let's say in a couple of years, the AI improves a lot and is able to provide OPM S1's level of quality or even better. Are you telling me you'd rather watch nothing than watch something amazing?

@xZabuzax Yes, because creating something beautiful requires human hands, creativity, hard work, and emotion. I wouldn't want to support something that actually causes more and more people to lose their jobs and poses a threat. Such a thing is simply an empty creation. It may look nice, but that doesn't change the fact that it's artificial. I'd rather watch ugly season 3 a hundred times more than some pretty ai shit

@Jollyne7 I get the emotional angle, but anime hasn’t been "pure human hands" for decades. Studios already rely on CGI, digital clean-up, auto-inbetweening, rotoscoping, outsourcing, and every shortcut possible because the industry is overworked and underpaid.

If AI eventually becomes just another tool in that pipeline and can actually deliver something consistently great, OPM S1-tier or better, I don’t see why that automatically makes it "empty".

You’re basically saying you’d rather watch something that looks bad just because humans made it, even if there’s a way to get something amazing without burning people out. That logic just doesn’t make sense to me.

If the AI can get similar results (or better) as OPM S1 years later in the future, then I bet everyone around here would rather have the AI animating it. And if you say "no", you'd rather have humans doing it and keep getting dogshit adaptations as OPM S3, then I don't believe you.