New
Oct 31, 2016 10:23 PM
#151
MitsukiHimeka said: DeplorableNico said: MitsukiHimeka said: Vikings getting steamrolled by Bears is probably one of the weirdest thing I've seen other than Seahawks losing to LA. The NFC as a whole is garbage outside Dallas. I don't think all the NFC teams outside of Dallas is considered garbage. Vikings and Falcons seems decent so far. Compared to the AFC a lot of teams look unprepared whenever interconference games happen. Falcons can't even hold off the Chargers and the Vikings can't seem to win vs. physical defenses because getting to Bradford is too easy now and that's how you can stop them. However, I think the Seahawks or Falcons will eventually find their way into being consistent again. I don't think the Vikings are going to go far with this offense at all. For now though, it's the Cowboys' conference to lose and they're looking like runaway winners. In the meantime, I think the Panthers are in for a turnaround. That win over the Cardinals is what's going to motivate them to go on another hot streak. Rams shouldn't be hard unless they're going in full on attack the opposing players mode. |
Nov 1, 2016 5:26 PM
#152
@JustALEX found the perfect article for you http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/king-nfl-ratings-racists-despise-free-black-men-article-1.2853885 |
Nov 1, 2016 8:28 PM
#153
MitsukiHimeka said: Vikings are terrible and that was confirmed after the Bears game. Eagles gave other teams a blueprint and their o line is horrible. I bet you they finish 8-8 or 9-7.DeplorableNico said: MitsukiHimeka said: Vikings getting steamrolled by Bears is probably one of the weirdest thing I've seen other than Seahawks losing to LA. The NFC as a whole is garbage outside Dallas. I don't think all the NFC teams outside of Dallas is considered garbage. Vikings and Falcons seems decent so far. |
Nov 3, 2016 8:46 PM
#154
Very awesome win by Falcons. |
Nov 3, 2016 8:55 PM
#155
Thanks for nothing Bucs. No wonder the Souths are always garbage save 1 or 2 teams combined. |
Nov 3, 2016 9:21 PM
#156
Falcons need a better D though if they're thinking Superbowl. |
Nov 3, 2016 9:35 PM
#157
However, I think the Seahawks or Falcons will eventually find their way into being consistent again. I don't think the Vikings are going to go far with this offense at all. For now though, it's the Cowboys' conference to lose and they're looking like runaway winners. I really hope the seahawks can become consistent again, I miss our golden team and I hate that we lost all our good players over the past two years.Money I suppose.. |
Nov 3, 2016 9:37 PM
#158
BasedBlake said: Seahawks remind me of the 02 Patriots. Seahawks will bounce back.However, I think the Seahawks or Falcons will eventually find their way into being consistent again. I don't think the Vikings are going to go far with this offense at all. For now though, it's the Cowboys' conference to lose and they're looking like runaway winners. I really hope the seahawks can become consistent again, I miss our golden team and I hate that we lost all our good players over the past two years.Money I suppose.. |
Nov 6, 2016 1:21 PM
#159
That was the shittiest onside kick i've ever seen. GG Steelers |
Nov 6, 2016 1:42 PM
#160
Browns are 0-9 and still can win the AFC North if they don't lose another game. |
Nov 6, 2016 2:47 PM
#161
Vikings 5-3. They're terrible. If this continues, my prediction will become reality. |
Nov 6, 2016 4:13 PM
#163
Glad Panthers won even though it would of been better if LA Rams were at 0-3 score wise. |
Nov 6, 2016 4:35 PM
#165
Packers truly are an average football team. Offense is random as fuck and the defense just cant get that 1 crucial stop it seems. |
Nov 6, 2016 4:38 PM
#166
baboon said: Packers truly are an average football team. Offense is random as fuck and the defense just cant get that 1 crucial stop it seems. Yeah, Packers aren't anything special. I agree with Nico, Lions division winners. |
Nov 6, 2016 4:46 PM
#167
Kagami said: baboon said: Packers truly are an average football team. Offense is random as fuck and the defense just cant get that 1 crucial stop it seems. Yeah, Packers aren't anything special. I agree with Nico, Lions division winners. Wouldnt be surprised if 9-7 is good enough to win the division. Vikings beat the Packers who beat the Lions who beat the Vikings... rematches will decide it |
Nov 6, 2016 4:47 PM
#168
Packers proving once again that the NFC outside Dallas is absolute hot garbage this year. |
Nov 6, 2016 4:51 PM
#169
Falcons look alright, though I dont know if that matters when playoffs start. Saints could be this year's sleeper team in the NFC although their defense is literal shit |
Nov 7, 2016 11:09 PM
#170
Nov 7, 2016 11:26 PM
#171
DeplorableNico said: Our defense is beatable though. I say we win 30-17.Jimmy Graham is fucking back, boyos Too bad we'll get BTFO in New England next week. I don't even think we'll score a point @Kagami |
Nov 7, 2016 11:41 PM
#172
Kagami said: DeplorableNico said: Our defense is beatable though. I say we win 30-17.Jimmy Graham is fucking back, boyos Too bad we'll get BTFO in New England next week. I don't even think we'll score a point @Kagami Nah, I think your defense will get through our porous and ineffective offensive line that we'll have to throw the ball too much under pressure. I say 44-3 Patriots |
Nov 8, 2016 9:27 PM
#173
Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. |
Nov 8, 2016 9:47 PM
#174
Firework_Fantasy said: Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. With what o-line? Seattle needs to score at least 27 since Brady and company will likely score at least that. |
Nov 8, 2016 9:52 PM
#175
Kagami said: Ehhh, they probably don't need to. I have a feeling Seahawks' D will slow Brady and company's offense down.Firework_Fantasy said: Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. With what o-line? Seattle needs to score at least 27 since Brady and company will likely score at least that. |
Nov 8, 2016 9:55 PM
#176
Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Ehhh, they probably don't need to. I have a feeling Seahawks' D will slow Brady and company's offense down.Firework_Fantasy said: Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. With what o-line? Seattle needs to score at least 27 since Brady and company will likely score at least that. Seattle gave up 25 to Buffalo. NE scored 28 in Superbowl 49. You don't think New England is scoring under 17 do you? Brady also has no interceptions as of now |
Nov 8, 2016 10:06 PM
#177
Kagami said: Well, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of them getting held under 17, no. Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Firework_Fantasy said: Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. With what o-line? Seattle needs to score at least 27 since Brady and company will likely score at least that. Seattle gave up 25 to Buffalo. NE scored 28 in Superbowl 49. You don't think New England is scoring under 17 do you? Brady also has no interceptions as of now And as for Brady having no interceptions, he haven't played a defense on Seattle's level as of yet. What Brady's doing is impressive, but I see Seahawks' defense making him struggle. |
Nov 8, 2016 10:10 PM
#178
Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Well, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of them getting held under 17, no. Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Ehhh, they probably don't need to. I have a feeling Seahawks' D will slow Brady and company's offense down.Firework_Fantasy said: Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. With what o-line? Seattle needs to score at least 27 since Brady and company will likely score at least that. Seattle gave up 25 to Buffalo. NE scored 28 in Superbowl 49. You don't think New England is scoring under 17 do you? Brady also has no interceptions as of now And as for Brady having no interceptions, he haven't played a defense on Seattle's level as of yet. What Brady's doing is impressive, but I see Seahawks' defense making him struggle. Seattle didn't make him struggle in SB 49 nor did they stop Buffalo from scoring 25 points (should of been more actually). Obviously it could happen and Seattle could win, but holding NE under 17 with the tools Brady has (best since 07) sounds really hard. |
Nov 8, 2016 10:21 PM
#179
Kagami said: He was strugglng at first, he just went berserk late in the game. Also, the Bills scored 25, sure, but what about holding the Cardinals to six points in five quarters? Their defense isn't looking as good right now, but I think they'll get back on track this week. Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Ehhh, they probably don't need to. I have a feeling Seahawks' D will slow Brady and company's offense down.Firework_Fantasy said: Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. With what o-line? Seattle needs to score at least 27 since Brady and company will likely score at least that. Seattle gave up 25 to Buffalo. NE scored 28 in Superbowl 49. You don't think New England is scoring under 17 do you? Brady also has no interceptions as of now And as for Brady having no interceptions, he haven't played a defense on Seattle's level as of yet. What Brady's doing is impressive, but I see Seahawks' defense making him struggle. Seattle didn't make him struggle in SB 49 nor did they stop Buffalo from scoring 25 points (should of been more actually). Obviously it could happen and Seattle could win, but holding NE under 17 with the tools Brady has (best since 07) sounds really hard. And yeah, it does. But after Giants shut the Patriots' offense down back in the Super Bowl, I wouldn't even be surprised. I'm a little biased anyway though. :P |
Nov 8, 2016 10:33 PM
#180
Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: He was strugglng at first, he just went berserk late in the game. Also, the Bills scored 25, sure, but what about holding the Cardinals to six points in five quarters? Their defense isn't looking as good right now, but I think they'll get back on track this week. Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Well, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of them getting held under 17, no. Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Ehhh, they probably don't need to. I have a feeling Seahawks' D will slow Brady and company's offense down.Firework_Fantasy said: Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. With what o-line? Seattle needs to score at least 27 since Brady and company will likely score at least that. Seattle gave up 25 to Buffalo. NE scored 28 in Superbowl 49. You don't think New England is scoring under 17 do you? Brady also has no interceptions as of now And as for Brady having no interceptions, he haven't played a defense on Seattle's level as of yet. What Brady's doing is impressive, but I see Seahawks' defense making him struggle. Seattle didn't make him struggle in SB 49 nor did they stop Buffalo from scoring 25 points (should of been more actually). Obviously it could happen and Seattle could win, but holding NE under 17 with the tools Brady has (best since 07) sounds really hard. And yeah, it does. But after Giants shut the Patriots' offense down back in the Super Bowl, I wouldn't even be surprised. I'm a little biased anyway though. :P They still scored 28 with less tools. That was also a better Seattle team than this unit. Seattle held Arizona to 6, but they only scored 6. Not to mention Seattle should of lost that game since Arizona missed the first OT field goal. Seattle has a solid defense, but stopping all these tools with an inferior unit with 6 days of prep time sounds harsh. Seattle has to be flawless. |
Nov 9, 2016 7:53 AM
#181
Kagami said: You seem to know your football and probably got the best of me in this discussion. But we shall see Sunday night. xPFirework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Well, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of them getting held under 17, no. Firework_Fantasy said: Kagami said: Ehhh, they probably don't need to. I have a feeling Seahawks' D will slow Brady and company's offense down.Firework_Fantasy said: Seattle will upset the Pats. Just watch. With what o-line? Seattle needs to score at least 27 since Brady and company will likely score at least that. Seattle gave up 25 to Buffalo. NE scored 28 in Superbowl 49. You don't think New England is scoring under 17 do you? Brady also has no interceptions as of now And as for Brady having no interceptions, he haven't played a defense on Seattle's level as of yet. What Brady's doing is impressive, but I see Seahawks' defense making him struggle. Seattle didn't make him struggle in SB 49 nor did they stop Buffalo from scoring 25 points (should of been more actually). Obviously it could happen and Seattle could win, but holding NE under 17 with the tools Brady has (best since 07) sounds really hard. And yeah, it does. But after Giants shut the Patriots' offense down back in the Super Bowl, I wouldn't even be surprised. I'm a little biased anyway though. :P They still scored 28 with less tools. That was also a better Seattle team than this unit. Seattle held Arizona to 6, but they only scored 6. Not to mention Seattle should of lost that game since Arizona missed the first OT field goal. Seattle has a solid defense, but stopping all these tools with an inferior unit with 6 days of prep time sounds harsh. Seattle has to be flawless. |
Nov 13, 2016 8:47 PM
#182
BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. |
Nov 13, 2016 10:35 PM
#183
Kagami said: BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. It was a clean and well-played game of sweet revenge :') Angry Doug can't be contained. Looks like I was wrong about these Hawks. They never gave up. |
Nov 13, 2016 10:45 PM
#184
SuperIdolNico said: Brady looked human too. If we got those three picks we almost had, we likely win. Tough game and Seattle did what I said they needed to: Score points. Doesn't matter though, NE's defense is god awful! 49ers may drop 28!Kagami said: BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. It was a clean and well-played game of sweet revenge :') Angry Doug can't be contained. Looks like I was wrong about these Hawks. They never gave up. |
Nov 13, 2016 10:49 PM
#185
Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Brady looked human too. If we got those three picks we almost had, we likely win. Tough game and Seattle did what I said they needed to: Score points. Doesn't matter though, NE's defense is god awful! 49ers may drop 28!Kagami said: BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. It was a clean and well-played game of sweet revenge :') Angry Doug can't be contained. Looks like I was wrong about these Hawks. They never gave up. It's the offensive line allowing the points to score. Today was a better game for them, so that's how we wouldn't be stopped. Next week is the Eagles for us, I think they're a bigger challenge on defense, but offensively I'm not too scared. |
Nov 13, 2016 10:51 PM
#186
Bill is losing his touch: Doesnt give the ball to Blount the ball when he has been money? Same as Lynch in SB 49. Trading Collings!? Not even trying against Miami during the last game of last season? Onside kick versus Eagles last season? |
Nov 13, 2016 10:56 PM
#187
Nov 13, 2016 10:56 PM
#188
SuperIdolNico said: Our defense stunk. Seahawks played well, but we dropped three easy picks and gave up yardage. Without our O-Line, we would end 9-7. Our D is just crippled. Not because of injury, but because of coaching and bad players. Seattle was the better team and trading Collins for nothing was the nail in the coffin.Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Kagami said: BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. It was a clean and well-played game of sweet revenge :') Angry Doug can't be contained. Looks like I was wrong about these Hawks. They never gave up. It's the offensive line allowing the points to score. Today was a better game for them, so that's how we wouldn't be stopped. Next week is the Eagles for us, I think they're a bigger challenge on defense, but offensively I'm not too scared. |
Nov 13, 2016 10:59 PM
#189
Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Our defense stunk. Seahawks played well, but we dropped three easy picks and gave up yardage. Without our O-Line, we would end 9-7. Our D is just crippled. Not because of injury, but because of coaching and bad players. Seattle was the better team and trading Collins for nothing was the nail in the coffin.Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Brady looked human too. If we got those three picks we almost had, we likely win. Tough game and Seattle did what I said they needed to: Score points. Doesn't matter though, NE's defense is god awful! 49ers may drop 28!Kagami said: BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. It was a clean and well-played game of sweet revenge :') Angry Doug can't be contained. Looks like I was wrong about these Hawks. They never gave up. It's the offensive line allowing the points to score. Today was a better game for them, so that's how we wouldn't be stopped. Next week is the Eagles for us, I think they're a bigger challenge on defense, but offensively I'm not too scared. Good front 7. Probably the Collins trade may have been the dumbest move imo. But I like Hightower and Brown, they're top players at their position. McCourty is the best in the secondary. I'm not sure about us being the better team, I think we played better tonight and with urgency because I think we really couldn't afford another bad road loss like the one in New Orleans. |
Nov 13, 2016 11:03 PM
#190
SuperIdolNico said: I love Hightower, great player. Same with McCourty. Though, when you don't have it you just can' t win games. I expect a 12-4 season and shootout with Oakland in the AFCCG. I say we lose the SB though. Dallas beats us and Seattle can too.Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Brady looked human too. If we got those three picks we almost had, we likely win. Tough game and Seattle did what I said they needed to: Score points. Doesn't matter though, NE's defense is god awful! 49ers may drop 28!Kagami said: BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. It was a clean and well-played game of sweet revenge :') Angry Doug can't be contained. Looks like I was wrong about these Hawks. They never gave up. It's the offensive line allowing the points to score. Today was a better game for them, so that's how we wouldn't be stopped. Next week is the Eagles for us, I think they're a bigger challenge on defense, but offensively I'm not too scared. Good front 7. Probably the Collins trade may have been the dumbest move imo. But I like Hightower and Brown, they're top players at their position. McCourty is the best in the secondary. I'm not sure about us being the better team, I think we played better tonight and with urgency because I think we really couldn't afford another bad road loss like the one in New Orleans. |
Nov 13, 2016 11:05 PM
#191
Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: I love Hightower, great player. Same with McCourty. Though, when you don't have it you just can' t win games. I expect a 12-4 season and shootout with Oakland in the AFCCG. I say we lose the SB though. Dallas beats us and Seattle can too.Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Our defense stunk. Seahawks played well, but we dropped three easy picks and gave up yardage. Without our O-Line, we would end 9-7. Our D is just crippled. Not because of injury, but because of coaching and bad players. Seattle was the better team and trading Collins for nothing was the nail in the coffin.Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Brady looked human too. If we got those three picks we almost had, we likely win. Tough game and Seattle did what I said they needed to: Score points. Doesn't matter though, NE's defense is god awful! 49ers may drop 28!Kagami said: BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. It was a clean and well-played game of sweet revenge :') Angry Doug can't be contained. Looks like I was wrong about these Hawks. They never gave up. It's the offensive line allowing the points to score. Today was a better game for them, so that's how we wouldn't be stopped. Next week is the Eagles for us, I think they're a bigger challenge on defense, but offensively I'm not too scared. Good front 7. Probably the Collins trade may have been the dumbest move imo. But I like Hightower and Brown, they're top players at their position. McCourty is the best in the secondary. I'm not sure about us being the better team, I think we played better tonight and with urgency because I think we really couldn't afford another bad road loss like the one in New Orleans. Yea and Dallas looks like they're impossible to beat atm. Their schedule is favorable too. Guess an offensive line really does go so far. But if you watched Zeke earlier today, you can conclude he's the best running back in the league right now and will be for years to come. |
Nov 13, 2016 11:22 PM
#192
SuperIdolNico said: Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Our defense stunk. Seahawks played well, but we dropped three easy picks and gave up yardage. Without our O-Line, we would end 9-7. Our D is just crippled. Not because of injury, but because of coaching and bad players. Seattle was the better team and trading Collins for nothing was the nail in the coffin.Kagami said: SuperIdolNico said: Brady looked human too. If we got those three picks we almost had, we likely win. Tough game and Seattle did what I said they needed to: Score points. Doesn't matter though, NE's defense is god awful! 49ers may drop 28!Kagami said: BB made one of the worst coaching decisions of his life. Trading away Collins killed this defense. Good win by Seattle and the Patriots 2ndhalf of the season collapse begins. It was a clean and well-played game of sweet revenge :') Angry Doug can't be contained. Looks like I was wrong about these Hawks. They never gave up. It's the offensive line allowing the points to score. Today was a better game for them, so that's how we wouldn't be stopped. Next week is the Eagles for us, I think they're a bigger challenge on defense, but offensively I'm not too scared. Good front 7. Probably the Collins trade may have been the dumbest move imo. But I like Hightower and Brown, they're top players at their position. McCourty is the best in the secondary. I'm not sure about us being the better team, I think we played better tonight and with urgency because I think we really couldn't afford another bad road loss like the one in New Orleans. Yea and Dallas looks like they're impossible to beat atm. Their schedule is favorable too. Guess an offensive line really does go so far. But if you watched Zeke earlier today, you can conclude he's the best running back in the league right now and will be for years to come. Here's how I see the playoffs going: 13-3 Raiders defeat 9-7 Ravens 12-2 Patriots deeat 12-2 Broncos 12-2 Patriots defeat 13-3 Raiders 14-2 Cowboys defeat 9-6-1 Redskins 12-3-1 Seahawks defeat 10-6 Falcons 14-2 Cowboys defeat 12-3-1 Seahawks 14-2 Cowboys defeat 12-4 Patriots |
Nov 14, 2016 7:40 AM
#193
I thought to myself.....I'll watch football because I can't stand hearing another goddamn thing about Trump.....but nope, I just don't care anymore about sports the way I used to. I just don't give a fuck anymore.... |
Nov 14, 2016 7:42 AM
#194
JustALEX said: I thought to myself.....I'll watch football because I can't stand hearing another goddamn thing about Trump.....but nope, I just don't care anymore about sports the way I used to. I just don't give a fuck anymore.... I think Jose Fernandez may have been the final straw in that. Sorry for reminding you if this hits home. |
Nov 15, 2016 12:31 AM
#197
Midseason Predictions Broncos over Texans Raiders over Ravens Falcons over Redskins Lions over Giants Broncos over Patriots Chiefs over Raiders Cowboys over Lions Seahawks over Falcons Chiefs over Broncos Seahawks over Cowboys Chiefs over Seahawks |
Nov 17, 2016 6:24 AM
#198
SuperIdolNico said: Is that... your playoffs breakdown?Midseason Predictions Broncos over Texans Raiders over Ravens Falcons over Redskins Lions over Giants Broncos over Patriots Chiefs over Raiders Cowboys over Lions Seahawks over Falcons Chiefs over Broncos Seahawks over Cowboys Chiefs over Seahawks |
Nov 17, 2016 12:29 PM
#199
The Super Bowl will probably be Dallas vs. New England, but Seattle may have a shot as well. I would rather see Dallas vs. Oakland, it would be more interesting. The Patriots are too methodical and boring. The Cowboys have become more exciting to watch with Ezekial Elliot and Prescott, even Dez is playing better now. Elliot's game vs. the Steelers was quite electrifying, especially the screen pass he ran 80+ yards for a TD, it was fun to watch that. |
Nov 17, 2016 5:54 PM
#200
SuperIdolNico said: Midseason Predictions Broncos over Texans Raiders over Ravens Falcons over Redskins Lions over Giants Broncos over Patriots Chiefs over Raiders Cowboys over Lions Seahawks over Falcons Chiefs over Broncos Seahawks over Cowboys Chiefs over Seahawks Stop overrating KC Chiefs every season. Like last season, they're a typical "Made pretender by Patriots" team. Broncos and Raiders maybe, but Chiefs will NOT make it to SB 51. Also: Cam Newton A tier QB? Ha! Besides his 15-1 season, I'd take Wilson over him anyday. Wilson is elite, Newton can't lead an average team like elites can. |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
272 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |