New
Jan 6, 2015 4:44 PM
#251
DrGeroCreation said: JustALEX said: WOW I didn't know you could get internet access while living under a rock. Seriously? Videogames have never been blamed for the violent actions of psychopaths and criminals?No one seems to bat an eyelash that these people might secretly be all psychopaths that want to actualize their video game fantasies in real life. Oh come on! It should be obvious that he isn't litterally referring to noone speaking out against video games but that the acceptance of media with violent content be it video games or other is a lot higher in the general public. It is a double standard to on the one hand consume such media but cry morals on loli content. |
Jan 6, 2015 4:55 PM
#252
Well that is a load of crap seeing as a majority of the anime industry seems to be against any suggestion of bringing lolicon to an end. Even companies that are not directly involved in making loli/shota-themed anime or characters have repeatedly faught against trying to get rid of it(legally). This is not to mention that if you know Japan's anime/manga otaku soceity then you'd know that they join the industry in opposing loli/shota regulations. So let me get to the point: If Japan's anime industry and fans are ok with lolicon in anime, then who the FUCK are you to say it's bad? That right there is annoying and offensive. The Japanese industry and fans clearly do not see it as a bad thing, but you do? Do you think you know whats better for the industry than the industry? Outside of a few older people within the anime industry, the majority of the industry seems, as I said, perfectly fine with it. If you ask me, I'd say I am with them. If you do not like lolicon, do not look at it. That is the great thing about anime, there is something there for everyone. That is also why westerner will never be able to compete with anime when it comes to creativity. Japan isn't afraid to cater to the minority, the west dares not cater to the minority. Now, do you want to know what I think is bad for anime? Two types of people: 1) Those that pirate it. The industry is more against piracy than loli/shota. 2) People that seemingly want restrictions on the creativity of the industry. The industry isn't behind you on your moral crusade to protect the human rights of things that are not real, so just drop the mindset. I rest my case. |
Jan 6, 2015 4:57 PM
#253
Asturaetus said: I guess it can be a little hypocritical but you have to take into account that different people have different morals that they follow.DrGeroCreation said: JustALEX said: No one seems to bat an eyelash that these people might secretly be all psychopaths that want to actualize their video game fantasies in real life. Oh come on! It should be obvious that he isn't litterally referring to noone speaking out against video games but that the acceptance of media with violent content be it video games or other is a lot higher in the general public. It is a double standard to on the one hand consume such media but cry morals on loli content. |
Jan 6, 2015 5:00 PM
#254
Lolicon said: Well that is a load of crap seeing as a majority of the anime industry seems to be against any suggestion of bringing lolicon to an end. Even companies that are not directly involved in making loli/shota-themed anime or characters have repeatedly faught against trying to get rid of it(legally). This is not to mention that if you know Japan's anime/manga otaku soceity then you'd know that they join the industry in opposing loli/shota regulations. So let me get to the point: If Japan's anime industry and fans are ok with lolicon in anime, then who the FUCK are you to say it's bad? That right there is annoying and offensive. The Japanese industry and fans clearly do not see it as a bad thing, but you do? Do you think you know whats better for the industry than the industry? Outside of a few older people within the anime industry, the majority of the industry seems, as I said, perfectly fine with it. If you ask me, I'd say I am with them. If you do not like lolicon, do not look at it. That is the great thing about anime, there is something there for everyone. That is also why westerner will never be able to compete with anime when it comes to creativity. Japan isn't afraid to cater to the minority, the west dares not cater to the minority. Now, do you want to know what I think is bad for anime? Two types of people: 1) Those that pirate it. The industry is more against piracy than loli/shota. 2) People that seemingly want restrictions on the creativity of the industry. The industry isn't behind you on your moral crusade to protect the human rights of things that are not real, so just drop the mindset. I rest my case. That's because they can easily do something to hinder loli while there is nothing they can do about pirating and will never be able to do anything about it. |
Jan 6, 2015 5:07 PM
#255
Oni_Link said: That's because they can easily do something to hinder loli while there is nothing they can do about pirating and will never be able to do anything about it. What? The industry is ok with loli/shota, as those of us that have payed close attention to Japan's child porn law and the news related to it before and after it's passing have noticed. The industry is NOT ok with piracy. The point I am making is that loli/shota isn't bad for anime, and the fans(in Japan) and industry have made that clear by majority. If the industry is ok with it, then who are any of us to say it's not ok? I am a pretty big narcissist but even I know that I do not know whats better for the anime industry than the anime industry itself. |
Jan 6, 2015 5:26 PM
#256
I just want to bring this entire thread to an end(for me) with the following statement that is iron solid. There is no reason to ban loli/shota, there is no reason to fear it, and there is no reason to think it hurts anime. There is no proof it creates real world problems and there is no proof it has made any negative impact on the anime industry. The thing that will hurt the anime industry is, as I keep saying, trying to restrict creativity. Lolicon has been apart of anime to some extent since the 70s and it is not going ANYWHERE anytime soon unless the Japanese government's study on the impact of loli/shota conclusively prove it's harmful and guess what? Every study on the impact of fictional child porn has shown it is NOT harmful and even that it HELPS stop child abuse. Allow me to post the only known majority study conducted on the impact of fictional child porn on real life and it was done in Denmark by the request of a lady in the Danish government that was aiming to supply proof that Denmark needs to BAN fictional child porn...unfortunately for her, the study didn't come back the way she had hoped: http://cphpost.dk/news/report-cartoon-paedophilia-harmless.2255.html < That link was also cited by Anime News Network's news department. Here is a bit more info from a competing news paper in Denmark posting the same study info: http://www.information.dk/306474 There are smaller studies and opinion pieces by experts in sexology, psychology, and other related fields(most of them are in Japan) that pretty much have stated that loli/shota is no real threat to the real world. The minority of people that commit crimes over what they see in fiction does not depict the mentality of the entireity of loli/shota fans. If 12% of anime seems to make the person that created this thread think that it hurts the majority of anime, then I doubt lolicon is the one with the problems. Finally, here is a more intelligent and trustworthy opinion piece by some one at Duke University. He supplies more sources than I care to regarding loli/shota. https://www.academia.edu/3665383/Lolicon_The_Reality_of_Virtual_Child_Pornography_in_Japan After all of this, there is no way someone can say loli/shota is bad for anime/manga or that it's harmful seeing as there is facts saying other wise. It all comes down to: IF YOU DO NOT LIKE, DO NOT WATCH! Is that too difficult for people? Viva la science! |
Jan 6, 2015 5:33 PM
#257
Jan 6, 2015 9:17 PM
#258
DrGeroCreation said: WOW I didn't know you could get internet access while living under a rock. Seriously? Videogames have never been blamed for the violent actions of psychopaths and criminals? Maybe I should've reworded it as.... No SANE, rational person bats an eyelash that people who enjoy FICTIONALLY killing humans in video games might actually want to do said action in real life. And all studies (as it has already been stated) debunk the crazy notion that video games are responsible for real violence. BTW....Japan has some of the lowest sexual crimes rate on this planet. So yeah.....lolicons are not out there wanting to do things to real kids, they're perfectly fine with drawings. |
Jan 7, 2015 10:05 AM
#259
Lolicon said: I just want to bring this entire thread to an end(for me) with the following statement that is iron solid. There is no reason to ban loli/shota, there is no reason to fear it, and there is no reason to think it hurts anime. There is no proof it creates real world problems and there is no proof it has made any negative impact on the anime industry. The thing that will hurt the anime industry is, as I keep saying, trying to restrict creativity. Lolicon has been apart of anime to some extent since the 70s and it is not going ANYWHERE anytime soon unless the Japanese government's study on the impact of loli/shota conclusively prove it's harmful and guess what? Every study on the impact of fictional child porn has shown it is NOT harmful and even that it HELPS stop child abuse. Allow me to post the only known majority study conducted on the impact of fictional child porn on real life and it was done in Denmark by the request of a lady in the Danish government that was aiming to supply proof that Denmark needs to BAN fictional child porn...unfortunately for her, the study didn't come back the way she had hoped: http://cphpost.dk/news/report-cartoon-paedophilia-harmless.2255.html < That link was also cited by Anime News Network's news department. Here is a bit more info from a competing news paper in Denmark posting the same study info: http://www.information.dk/306474 There are smaller studies and opinion pieces by experts in sexology, psychology, and other related fields(most of them are in Japan) that pretty much have stated that loli/shota is no real threat to the real world. The minority of people that commit crimes over what they see in fiction does not depict the mentality of the entireity of loli/shota fans. If 12% of anime seems to make the person that created this thread think that it hurts the majority of anime, then I doubt lolicon is the one with the problems. Finally, here is a more intelligent and trustworthy opinion piece by some one at Duke University. He supplies more sources than I care to regarding loli/shota. https://www.academia.edu/3665383/Lolicon_The_Reality_of_Virtual_Child_Pornography_in_Japan After all of this, there is no way someone can say loli/shota is bad for anime/manga or that it's harmful seeing as there is facts saying other wise. It all comes down to: IF YOU DO NOT LIKE, DO NOT WATCH! Is that too difficult for people? Viva la science! You were right on some things but incredibly ignorant on others. 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. 2) Piracy does not hurt the industry like they want you to think. |
Jan 7, 2015 10:09 AM
#260
Things like MAL users gives anime a bad reputation |
FragOutFire said: Why am I a Berserk fan? All I ever experience is pain. We are in the eclipse and Miura has sacrificed us |
Jan 7, 2015 10:51 AM
#261
JustALEX said: There have been researchers and scientists claiming that violent video games could increase aggression. You are right though there is no real evidence 100% supporting the idea that violent video games are responsible for violence irl. I have never said that all lolicons are out to sexually attack kids. I believe though that lolis could attract pedophiles considering lolis are little girl cartoon characters. Considering adults being sexually attracted to kids is not socially acceptable (well in most countries anyway) lolis can be an alternative.DrGeroCreation said: WOW I didn't know you could get internet access while living under a rock. Seriously? Videogames have never been blamed for the violent actions of psychopaths and criminals? Maybe I should've reworded it as.... No SANE, rational person bats an eyelash that people who enjoy FICTIONALLY killing humans in video games might actually want to do said action in real life. And all studies (as it has already been stated) debunk the crazy notion that video games are responsible for real violence. BTW....Japan has some of the lowest sexual crimes rate on this planet. So yeah.....lolicons are not out there wanting to do things to real kids, they're perfectly fine with drawings. |
Jan 7, 2015 11:00 AM
#262
DrGeroCreation said: JustALEX said: There have been researchers and scientists claiming that violent video games could increase aggression. You are right though there is no real evidence 100% supporting the idea that violent video games are responsible for violence irl. I have never said that all lolicons are out to sexually attack kids. I believe though that lolis could attract pedophiles considering lolis are little girl cartoon characters. Considering adults being sexually attracted to kids is not socially acceptable (well in most countries anyway) lolis can be an alternative.DrGeroCreation said: WOW I didn't know you could get internet access while living under a rock. Seriously? Videogames have never been blamed for the violent actions of psychopaths and criminals? Maybe I should've reworded it as.... No SANE, rational person bats an eyelash that people who enjoy FICTIONALLY killing humans in video games might actually want to do said action in real life. And all studies (as it has already been stated) debunk the crazy notion that video games are responsible for real violence. BTW....Japan has some of the lowest sexual crimes rate on this planet. So yeah.....lolicons are not out there wanting to do things to real kids, they're perfectly fine with drawings. Which would be a good thing since hey aren't looking at actual children. |
Jan 7, 2015 11:10 AM
#263
tsudecimo said: Get off tsudecimo's profile & let him rest in peace.Yes, they should die and burn. |
Jan 7, 2015 11:33 AM
#264
Drunk_Samurai said: I guess so.Which would be a good thing since hey aren't looking at actual children. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:05 PM
#265
Drunk_Samurai said: 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. Especially when some lolis aren't even children in the first place, but full-fledged adults who are just very short and have a child-like build. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:08 PM
#266
AO968 said: Uh........ this argument again. The thing is they do look like children even if they are supposedly adults.Drunk_Samurai said: 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. Especially when some lolis aren't even children in the first place, but full-fledged adults who are just very short and have a child-like build. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:15 PM
#267
AO968 said: Drunk_Samurai said: 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. Especially when some lolis aren't even children in the first place, but full-fledged adults who are just very short and have a child-like build. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:17 PM
#268
AO968 said: dont justify your pedo instinct with that lame legal-loli excuseDrunk_Samurai said: 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. Especially when some lolis aren't even children in the first place, but full-fledged adults who are just very short and have a child-like build. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:18 PM
#269
Who does decide if a nonexisting person would be a child or not ? You @DrGeroCreation ? One may say that Louise Francoise le Blanc de Valliere would be a "loli". Some other would say that she would be a teen with simple small breasts. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:19 PM
#270
Common said: |
FragOutFire said: Why am I a Berserk fan? All I ever experience is pain. We are in the eclipse and Miura has sacrificed us |
Jan 7, 2015 12:21 PM
#271
DrGeroCreation said: AO968 said: Uh........ this argument again. The thing is they do look like children even if they are supposedly adults.Drunk_Samurai said: 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. Especially when some lolis aren't even children in the first place, but full-fledged adults who are just very short and have a child-like build. Exactly that post gave me a headache :P All lolis are children. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:26 PM
#272
Cyanwasserstoff said: Lolis look and act like children or just look like children. ExampleWho does decide if a nonexisting person would be a child or not ? You @DrGeroCreation ? One may say that Louise Francoise le Blanc de Valliere would be a "loli". Some other would say that she would be a teen with simple small breasts. Loli Not loli Oni_Link said: Even when they are adults they look or act and look like children.Exactly that post gave me a headache :P All lolis are children. |
DrGeroCreationJan 7, 2015 12:31 PM
Jan 7, 2015 12:35 PM
#273
DrGeroCreation said: AO968 said: Uh........ this argument again. The thing is they do look like children even if they are supposedly adults.Drunk_Samurai said: 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. Especially when some lolis aren't even children in the first place, but full-fledged adults who are just very short and have a child-like build. You can't call it 'virtual child porn' if the character is not a child, but merely looks like one. Why is that so hard to understand? Besides, why call it child porn at all, when we already have a term for it? There's a reason that term exists, so why call it something else, or compare it with something that looks similar at first glance, but is actually vastly different? |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:39 PM
#274
DrGeroCreation said: Lolis look and act like children or just look like children. Example Loli Not loli Yeah, but you chose a very obvious one. I am talking about "the older kind of loli" like Louise, like Shana, like Kuroko Shirai. Some also see them as loli characters and some people do not think that way. |
Jan 7, 2015 12:42 PM
#275
Lolis are like children? I don't know if I should laugh. Ever had to parent some of your relatives brats? Those little snotty nosed monsters? Lolis in anime behave as much like real children as female characters in anime behave like real women. ^^ |
Jan 7, 2015 12:48 PM
#276
Asturaetus said: It doesn't matter if they fully behave like rl children, they are anime versions of kids. Just like adult female anime characters would be anime versions of rl adult women. Also yes there are lolis that act just like little kids.Lolis are like children? I don't know if I should laugh. Ever had to parent some of your relatives brats? Those little snotty nosed monsters? Lolis in anime behave as much like real children as female characters in anime behave like real women. ^^ |
Jan 7, 2015 1:08 PM
#277
AO968 said: Drunk_Samurai said: 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. Especially when some lolis aren't even children in the first place, but full-fledged adults who are just very short and have a child-like build. This kind of comment reminds me of that one scene in Transformers 4 where Michael Bay literally paused the movie so he can give us a reason why one can bang a minor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTaT5yg0xIM |
Ad Astra Per Aspera |
Jan 7, 2015 1:10 PM
#278
Yes, it does. In my country, where I think that anime is a lot more social acceptable than in the US for example, if you say that you watch anime it's almost guaranteed that someone will think that you like hentai or even that you are some sort of pedophile. I don't have anything against someone who likes those kinds of entertainment but I wouldn't mind if more than 50% of the seasonal anime were pretentious, pseudo-intelectual hipster animu something different than those moe and loli shows. |
Jan 7, 2015 1:37 PM
#279
Konata is also commonly called a loli despite being 17-18. |
Jan 7, 2015 2:38 PM
#280
They don't exist, so who gives a shit? Are we really going to split hairs? A prepubescent loli looks like a prepubescent loli! |
Jan 7, 2015 2:41 PM
#281
Lyuze said: A lot of people seem to be under the idea that "because I'm not hurting anyone it's perfectly fine!" which couldn't be any further from the truth. Fantasizing over murder as a concept isn't healthy nor morally sound. If you sit in your room getting off to the idea of harming other people, you are not an okay person; I think most could agree on that. Fantasizing over having sex and potentially both mentally and physically damaging a child as a concept is absolutely not okay. It's not about the child being fictional or real, it's the idea that's unsavoury. Please bare in mind that there's a difference between liking loli and liking petite bodies, regardless of what the tags on Gelbooru and exhentai will try to tell you. If you're just not attracted to big melon tits and find flat chests and less developed features to be more appealing, that's perfectly fine; you like petite structure and that's even the kind of body type I massively prefer. But if you want to put your dick inside a physically and mentally unprepared child, regardless of whether they're fictional or real; you have a problem. For the last time, they don't want to fuck real children. People have rape fantasies all the time, and it is considered completely natural. It's called BDSM. Is it suddenly not okay for people to practice BDSM? Besides, have you realize how ugly real children would be to lolicons? They're hideous little creatures. |
removed-userJan 7, 2015 2:50 PM
Jan 7, 2015 2:47 PM
#282
Lyuze said: A lot of people seem to be under the idea that "because I'm not hurting anyone it's perfectly fine!" which couldn't be any further from the truth. Fantasizing over murder as a concept isn't healthy nor morally sound. If you sit in your room getting off to the idea of harming other people, you are not an okay person; I think most could agree on that. Fantasizing over having sex and potentially both mentally and physically damaging a child as a concept is absolutely not okay. It's not about the child being fictional or real, it's the idea that's unsavoury. Please bare in mind that there's a difference between liking loli and liking petite bodies, regardless of what the tags on Gelbooru and exhentai will try to tell you. If you're just not attracted to big melon tits and find flat chests and less developed features to be more appealing, that's perfectly fine; you like petite structure and that's even the kind of body type I massively prefer. But if you want to put your dick inside a physically and mentally unprepared child, regardless of whether they're fictional or real; you have a problem. People have rape fantasies, yet that's completely natural. There's a term for it: BDSM. This is no different. Sorry if I replied twice, but they don't want to screw real children. |
Jan 7, 2015 3:03 PM
#283
Cyanwasserstoff said: From the pics I have seen yeah those characters do look like lolis (little girl cartoon characters). Those characters look 12 at most.Yeah, but you chose a very obvious one. I am talking about "the older kind of loli" like Louise, like Shana, like Kuroko Shirai. Some also see them as loli characters and some people do not think that way. AO968 said: Most lolis are little girls. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck then it is a duck. Loli hentai (which you are referring to) isn't child porn but it is little girl cartoon porn.You can't call it 'virtual child porn' if the character is not a child, but merely looks like one. Why is that so hard to understand? Besides, why call it child porn at all, when we already have a term for it? There's a reason that term exists, so why call it something else, or compare it with something that looks similar at first glance, but is actually vastly different? |
DrGeroCreationJan 7, 2015 3:17 PM
Jan 7, 2015 3:34 PM
#284
PeripheralVision said: Nah I like kids, they're (mostly) fun and can be cute. But that's more in a fatherly/big brother sense, I seem to get along well with children and have absolutely no desire to do anything beyond tickle them (oh god, I'm such a monster!). Of course in the 21st century, even high 5'ing a child that isn't your own is considered molestation.For the last time, they don't want to fuck real children. People have rape fantasies all the time, and it is considered completely natural. It's called BDSM. Is it suddenly not okay for people to practice BDSM? Besides, have you realize how ugly real children would be to lolicons? They're hideous little creatures. |
Jan 7, 2015 4:51 PM
#285
Hey fuck off yeh? Nothing wrong with a bit of loli and wincest, on the contrary! |
Jan 7, 2015 4:57 PM
#286
AO968 said: That's just an excuse...Drunk_Samurai said: 1) Lolicon is not child porn at all. There are absolutely zero children involved. Especially when some lolis aren't even children in the first place, but full-fledged adults who are just very short and have a child-like build. |
Jan 7, 2015 5:23 PM
#287
Does child porn give porn a bad rep? |
Jan 7, 2015 5:29 PM
#288
The thing that seperates loli themed anime from child porn is that it is purely fiction. I firmly believe that fiction is allowed to do everything. Even exploring themes that go would go against the morals or about acts that commited in the real world would be outlawed. If someone wants to write a story about courting a child like Nabokov did, then he should be free to write it. You don't like the content? Maybe it even repulses you? Good. Art isn't always about enjoyment or entertainment. Sometimes it even deliberately tries to induce reactions such as disgust or fear. Furthermore this very discussion is more than enough reason for loli content to exist. Just think about it: the very fact that you discuss about it means that it led you to either question or reaffirm your position on this matter. It challenged your morals. Led you to start thinking. Isn't that value in itself? |
Jan 7, 2015 5:34 PM
#289
Asturaetus said: The thing that seperates loli themed anime from child porn is that it is purely fiction. I firmly believe that fiction is allowed to do everything. Even exploring themes that go would go against the morals or about acts that commited in the real world would be outlawed. If someone wants to write a story about courting a child like Nabokov did, then he should be free to write it. You don't like the content? Maybe it even repulses you? Good. Art isn't always about enjoyment or entertainment. Sometimes it even deliberately tries to induce reactions such as disgust or fear. Furthermore this very discussion is more than enough reason for loli content to exist. Just think about it: the very fact that you discuss about it means that it led you to either question or reaffirm your position on this matter. It challenged your morals. Led you to start thinking. Isn't that value in itself? What you said makes too much sense......so no one will agree with you. MAL is infamous for having some of the most closed-minded morons on the web. |
Jan 7, 2015 5:53 PM
#290
Journey_95 said: What do you think? sure you can say that I don't have to watch it but the fact that it exists (not only in hentai but in "normal" Animes too) is a bad thing for Anime in general if you ask me Anime is such a great medium (some of them easily stand up to the popular tv Shows or movies in my opinion) but with crazy things like this they are dragged down And please don't come with stuff like "its just Anime not real life" you can like whatever you want I'm talking about the Problem that its so normal in Animes and the effect of that @Asturaetus This thread was never about outlawing loli. The OP was just asking what people thought about the effect that loli has on anime as a whole. |
Jan 7, 2015 5:54 PM
#291
They do! Whenever I tell someone I watch anime (A non-otaku) They automaticaly think I watch hentai! |
Jan 7, 2015 6:56 PM
#292
XxCorpsePartyxX said: Which should tell you that getting rid of loli/shota/incest/[insert other specific unseemly fetish here] would have zero net effect on the perception of anime among ignorant normals.They do! Whenever I tell someone I watch anime (A non-otaku) They automaticaly think I watch hentai! |
Jan 7, 2015 7:08 PM
#293
Zalis said: +1XxCorpsePartyxX said: Which should tell you that getting rid of loli/shota/incest/[insert other specific unseemly fetish here] would have zero net effect on the perception of anime among ignorant normals.They do! Whenever I tell someone I watch anime (A non-otaku) They automaticaly think I watch hentai! |
Jan 7, 2015 7:16 PM
#294
Absolutely! It is disgusting and I hate being associated with anything like that. Honestly though, many Anime fans themselves cause the bad rep. Social awkwardness, being unattractive (not taking care of themselves), and generally being outliers of society isn't exactly a great reputation. The last point can be good or bad, but it's generally bad in this context. |
Jan 7, 2015 7:30 PM
#295
RichtheLionheart said: Absolutely! It is disgusting and I hate being associated with anything like that. Honestly though, many Anime fans themselves cause the bad rep. Social awkwardness, being unattractive (not taking care of themselves), and generally being outliers of society isn't exactly a great reputation. The last point can be good or bad, but it's generally bad in this context. agree completely one can only hope that it will somehow die out (but it probably won't) |
Jan 7, 2015 7:33 PM
#296
Asturaetus said: The thing that seperates loli themed anime from child porn is that it is purely fiction. I firmly believe that fiction is allowed to do everything. Even exploring themes that go would go against the morals or about acts that commited in the real world would be outlawed. If someone wants to write a story about courting a child like Nabokov did, then he should be free to write it. You don't like the content? Maybe it even repulses you? Good. Art isn't always about enjoyment or entertainment. Sometimes it even deliberately tries to induce reactions such as disgust or fear. Furthermore this very discussion is more than enough reason for loli content to exist. Just think about it: the very fact that you discuss about it means that it led you to either question or reaffirm your position on this matter. It challenged your morals. Led you to start thinking. Isn't that value in itself? "exploring themes that would go against the morals of the real world" I have nothing against that but lolicon/incest etc. animes don't "explore" anything they are just made to be funny and have lots of fanservice they are not meant to be taken seriously and are just made for people with sick fetishes thats it and thats what gives anime a bad reputation |
Jan 7, 2015 7:35 PM
#297
Journey_95 said: Just look at all the threads about people on here being depressed, liking or loving being a shut-in. SMHRichtheLionheart said: Absolutely! It is disgusting and I hate being associated with anything like that. Honestly though, many Anime fans themselves cause the bad rep. Social awkwardness, being unattractive (not taking care of themselves), and generally being outliers of society isn't exactly a great reputation. The last point can be good or bad, but it's generally bad in this context. agree completely one can only hope that it will somehow die out (but it probably won't) It will die out as anime slowly becomes more mainstream in the west. It's going to take some time though....... |
Jan 7, 2015 7:38 PM
#298
Oni_Link said: Journey_95 said: Just look at all the threads about people on here being depressed, liking or loving being a shut-in. SMHRichtheLionheart said: Absolutely! It is disgusting and I hate being associated with anything like that. Honestly though, many Anime fans themselves cause the bad rep. Social awkwardness, being unattractive (not taking care of themselves), and generally being outliers of society isn't exactly a great reputation. The last point can be good or bad, but it's generally bad in this context. agree completely one can only hope that it will somehow die out (but it probably won't) It will die out as anime slowly becomes more mainstream in the west. It's going to take some time though....... meanwhile we can be happy that there are enough good animes without all that disgusting stuff |
Jan 7, 2015 7:41 PM
#299
Who cares anime is bad anyway |
Jan 7, 2015 7:41 PM
#300
Journey_95 said: Oni_Link said: Journey_95 said: RichtheLionheart said: Absolutely! It is disgusting and I hate being associated with anything like that. Honestly though, many Anime fans themselves cause the bad rep. Social awkwardness, being unattractive (not taking care of themselves), and generally being outliers of society isn't exactly a great reputation. The last point can be good or bad, but it's generally bad in this context. agree completely one can only hope that it will somehow die out (but it probably won't) It will die out as anime slowly becomes more mainstream in the west. It's going to take some time though....... meanwhile we can be happy that there are enough good animes without all that disgusting stuff Yep :) and it's great to see others feel the same way. I'm not giving up my hobby because of the negative connotations. However, I do hope things get better. |
More topics from this board
» What percentage of your waifu's body is kissable?Catalano - 3 hours ago |
19 |
by WaterMage
»»
1 minute ago |
|
» The "Backstory" Problemsimonitro - 36 minutes ago |
5 |
by narikuu
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» Anime characters that used to be older than you, now you're older than themComeInReiAsuka - 3 hours ago |
12 |
by ColourWheel
»»
14 minutes ago |
|
» ⌛ Best Girls of the Past Eras >Increased Limit ( 1 2 3 )Shizuna - Oct 10 |
126 |
by Noctblade
»»
22 minutes ago |
|
» Characters you want to become your siblingsm_alhafidz - 2 hours ago |
6 |
by Maou_heika
»»
35 minutes ago |