New
Is it wrong to be sexually attracted to prepubescent children?
Yes, and I am not.
52.0%
132
No, and I am not.
25.6%
65
Yes, and I am.
4.3%
11
No, and I am.
18.1%
46
254 votes
Sep 2, 2009 8:21 PM
#1
http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu said: prepubescent, prepubertal - (especially of human beings) at the age immediately before puberty; often marked by accelerated growth) In other words, this thread only applies to children under the age of 12... Hail the motherland. Hell, I don't know where I'm going with this. I guess I just kinda want to get it off my chest that I'm highly attracted to girls under the age of 12, on paper and off, and that I think I shouldn't be persecuted about it since I haven't done anything (and don't plan on it). I mean shit. I know wanting to have sex with little girls is wrong - I'm not one of those crazy pro-pedophilia guys who's all for the "right for children to have sex with whomever they please" but I'm also not going to lie to myself. I find little girls sexually attractive, alright? I like reading various hentai doujins that focus on this topic. I don't think they should be banned, because the benefits outweigh the "risks". If lolicon gets banned in the United States then child modeling should get banned too. Everything involving children that has sexual undertones should be banned, I mean shit, if you're going to do it, at least do it right. The fact of the matter is I know the way I think is wrong, and I'm not willing to change. But really, any way you look at it, even in the most conservative views, I'm only hurting myself. Why can't I be free to hurt myself? Btw be serious, dammit. |
Sick_BastardSep 2, 2009 8:31 PM
I'm back. |
Sep 2, 2009 8:26 PM
#2
Look at it this way. If I were a parent -- of a such a child -- and someone OLD comes after him/her -- I would beat the TAR out of that person. While you can cite Elvis himself for dating a 13-year old -- those days are over. The sign of the times dictate increased protection for children. Ever wondered why all this attention against pedophilia came from? There was a string of cases within the past 5-10 years, where sexual predators would target children. Within days of abductions, children were literally found dead. That's where the line was really drawn; and society simply said, "Enough is Enough". Finally, there's this: http://myanimelist.net/forum/?topicid=110316 |
Click on this. I dare you. | MAL Fantasy Football League | Currently Watching List RWBY Club. RWBY is anime. Deal with it. Visionaries are always mocked by fools. |
Sep 2, 2009 8:27 PM
#3
Haruka123 said: You're only 15, you needa grow a dick first. 1. I'm 16, dumbass. Learn to count. 2. Congrats on your first post. Also: I do have a dick. No I won't post it. |
I'm back. |
Sep 2, 2009 8:32 PM
#4
Sick_Bastard said: Haruka123 said: You're only 15, you needa grow a dick first. 1. I'm 16, dumbass. Learn to count. 2. Congrats on your first post. Also: I do have a dick. No I won't post it. That means -- you have 2 years left to enjoy the young ones. Have fun. |
Click on this. I dare you. | MAL Fantasy Football League | Currently Watching List RWBY Club. RWBY is anime. Deal with it. Visionaries are always mocked by fools. |
Sep 2, 2009 8:32 PM
#5
Haruka123 said: Shut the fuck up faggot. Learn to count my ass bitch. You learn to grow some pubes. Well, wont take long for you to get banned will it? And judging by the way you reacted in this thread, you're either 14 years old, or you're an extremely immature adult. Either way, you shouldn't be telling someone to grow some pubes untill you grow up. |
SayalolSep 2, 2009 8:38 PM
L2 Search - http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs48/f/2009/236/3/9/L2_Search_by_Siya_Akuma.jpg We're all getting trolled by Mayans. They probably thought "Fuck this shit, let's end the calendar and say shit's gonna go down." |
Sep 2, 2009 8:47 PM
#6
Haruka123 said: Sayalol said: Haruka123 said: Shut the fuck up faggot. Learn to count my ass bitch. You learn to grow some pubes. Well, wont take long for you to get banned will it? And judging by the way you reacted in this thread, you're either 14 years old, or you're an extremely immature adult. Either way, you shouldn't be telling someone to grow some pubes untill you grow up. Who the fuck are you to talk? Well, this is probably a troll account. However, for future trolling purposes, take note that you don't go to the pubic hair dojo to learn the art of growing a ball fro. Your body naturally does it, no education necessary. But, you'll find this all out when you go through puberty as well. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the General Forum Guidelines! |
Sep 2, 2009 8:51 PM
#7
Sayalol said: Haruka123 said: Shut the fuck up faggot. Learn to count my ass bitch. You learn to grow some pubes. Well, wont take long for you to get banned will it? And judging by the way you reacted in this thread, you're either 14 years old, or you're an extremely immature adult. Either way, you shouldn't be telling someone to grow some pubes untill you grow up. Hey, I'm 14 and I'm capable of semi-intelligent conversation...most of the time. And attraction is just a fetish, this particular one is illegal though, so bad luck? |
Sep 2, 2009 8:52 PM
#8
KyuuA4 said: That means -- you have 2 years left to enjoy the young ones. Have fun. Wikipedia said: An example is Texas Penal Code, Section 22.011(e). It provides an affirmative defense to a charge of sexual assault if all of the following apply: * the actor was fewer than 3 years older than the victim at the time of the offense, * the victim was older than 14 years of age at the time of the offense, * the actor was not at the time registered or required to register for life as a sex offender, * the conduct did not constitute incest, and * neither actor nor victim would commit bigamy by marrying the other (in other words, neither was married to a third person). A similar affirmative defense exists in the Texas Penal Code for the related crime of "continuous sexual abuse of a young child or children". Any defense under either law, however, does not apply to the separate crime of "improper educator/student relationship", or for "aggravated sexual assault" which is the forcible rape statute of Texas law. :( |
I'm back. |
Sep 2, 2009 8:53 PM
#9
Haruka123 said: Who the fuck are you to talk? Other than the fact that that was taken over 3 years ago and has nothing to do with matureity. You're a terrible troll and you should just stop now. All though, I must say, you're doing an excellent job at making your self look like a complete idiot who clearly has no witty come backs. |
L2 Search - http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs48/f/2009/236/3/9/L2_Search_by_Siya_Akuma.jpg We're all getting trolled by Mayans. They probably thought "Fuck this shit, let's end the calendar and say shit's gonna go down." |
Sep 2, 2009 8:54 PM
#10
Sick_Bastard said: KyuuA4 said: That means -- you have 2 years left to enjoy the young ones. Have fun. Wikipedia said: An example is Texas Penal Code, Section 22.011(e). It provides an affirmative defense to a charge of sexual assault if all of the following apply: * the actor was fewer than 3 years older than the victim at the time of the offense, * the victim was older than 14 years of age at the time of the offense, * the actor was not at the time registered or required to register for life as a sex offender, * the conduct did not constitute incest, and * neither actor nor victim would commit bigamy by marrying the other (in other words, neither was married to a third person). A similar affirmative defense exists in the Texas Penal Code for the related crime of "continuous sexual abuse of a young child or children". Any defense under either law, however, does not apply to the separate crime of "improper educator/student relationship", or for "aggravated sexual assault" which is the forcible rape statute of Texas law. :( At least you always have lolis in hentai. |
Sep 2, 2009 8:54 PM
#11
It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. |
(づ°‿°.)づ |
Sep 2, 2009 8:57 PM
#12
Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the General Forum Guidelines! |
Sep 2, 2009 8:59 PM
#13
Yes it is wrong to be sexually attracted to prepubescent children and no I am not sexually attracted to prepubescent children. If you are a grown adult who finds prepubescent children sexually attractive then you should seek help from a shrink. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:04 PM
#14
mightykid218 said: Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. At least with children you can hear them cry and suffer. Wait, did that sound as sick as I think it did? |
(づ°‿°.)づ |
Sep 2, 2009 9:08 PM
#15
mightykid218 said: No, when you rape dead people, you hurt their souls. Would you like it if someone just walked up to you and violated your soul? I think not.Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:08 PM
#16
mightykid218 said: Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. Damn. Got a point there. |
I'm back. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:10 PM
#17
llxwarbirdxll said: mightykid218 said: No, when you rape dead people, you hurt their souls. Would you like it if someone just walked up to you and violated your soul? I think not.Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. Na, even by a religious standard it wouldn't work like that. I mean, if you believe nothing will happen to you when you die, and you're just dead, nothing else, then you wouldn't know your body is being violated because you're dead, no soul. Christian, either you'll be in heaven and be too happy in paradise to care; in hell, and being tortured to much to notice, or in purgetory, to busy in the fire being cleansed to want to know. Buddihsim, you'll ascend, so there will be no body, That one religion, you'll be with 72 virgins, so you wont care...The list goes on.... |
L2 Search - http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs48/f/2009/236/3/9/L2_Search_by_Siya_Akuma.jpg We're all getting trolled by Mayans. They probably thought "Fuck this shit, let's end the calendar and say shit's gonna go down." |
Sep 2, 2009 9:11 PM
#18
I use to be attracted to the 3d loli, when I went to my cousins softball games about a year ago. Thank god I'm not 18 yet, and not attracted to the 3d anymore. Fuck these lolicon banning faggots though. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:15 PM
#19
llxwarbirdxll said: soul? Haha. What the hell is that? Never heard of it before. Puni said: I use to be attracted to the 3d loli, when I went to my cousins softball games about a year ago. Thank god I'm not 18 yet, and not attracted to the 3d anymore. Fuck these lolicon banning faggots though. Even being against pedos I'd have to agree. It's drawings, meaning none of it matters. It shouldn't be illegal. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the General Forum Guidelines! |
Sep 2, 2009 9:15 PM
#20
No. Only to act on it. And then, you must understand /why/ it is wrong to ct on it. It's not wrong in it's own merit, but because a kid under 12 generally (I say generally because I am an exception myself) cannot understand, seek out, and consent to such things. That said, if it could be demonstrated that someone under 12 was on-par with the average, say, 17 year old in the respect, then I wouldn't say acting on it is wrong in such a case. The problem lies with the inability to effectively gauge maturity, thus we tend to generalize in order to protect those who might get swept up into something they don't fully understand. As per attraction to death bodies: it strikes me as completely absurd that there are laws against this. Better someone rapes an inanimate object than a real person. |
"When he will, the weary world Of the senses closely curled Like a serpent round his heart Shakes herself and stands apart." - A.C., Equinox I/I |
Sep 2, 2009 9:18 PM
#21
Sayalol said: Are you happy with your life right now?llxwarbirdxll said: mightykid218 said: No, when you rape dead people, you hurt their souls. Would you like it if someone just walked up to you and violated your soul? I think not.Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. Na, even by a religious standard it wouldn't work like that. I mean, if you believe nothing will happen to you when you die, and you're just dead, nothing else, then you wouldn't know your body is being violated because you're dead, no soul. Christian, either you'll be in heaven and be too happy in paradise to care; in hell, and being tortured to much to notice, or in purgetory, to busy in the fire being cleansed to want to know. Buddihsim, you'll ascend, so there will be no body, That one religion, you'll be with 72 virgins, so you wont care...The list goes on.... |
Sep 2, 2009 9:19 PM
#22
llxwarbirdxll said: Sayalol said: Are you happy with your life right now?llxwarbirdxll said: mightykid218 said: No, when you rape dead people, you hurt their souls. Would you like it if someone just walked up to you and violated your soul? I think not.Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. Na, even by a religious standard it wouldn't work like that. I mean, if you believe nothing will happen to you when you die, and you're just dead, nothing else, then you wouldn't know your body is being violated because you're dead, no soul. Christian, either you'll be in heaven and be too happy in paradise to care; in hell, and being tortured to much to notice, or in purgetory, to busy in the fire being cleansed to want to know. Buddihsim, you'll ascend, so there will be no body, That one religion, you'll be with 72 virgins, so you wont care...The list goes on.... Completely happy, why do you ask? |
L2 Search - http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs48/f/2009/236/3/9/L2_Search_by_Siya_Akuma.jpg We're all getting trolled by Mayans. They probably thought "Fuck this shit, let's end the calendar and say shit's gonna go down." |
Sep 2, 2009 9:20 PM
#23
Ontario said: mightykid218 said: Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. At least with children you can hear them cry and suffer. Wait, did that sound as sick as I think it did? Only in certain countries. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:21 PM
#24
Sick_Bastard said: KyuuA4 said: That means -- you have 2 years left to enjoy the young ones. Have fun. Wikipedia said: An example is Texas Penal Code, Section 22.011(e). It provides an affirmative defense to a charge of sexual assault if all of the following apply: * the actor was fewer than 3 years older than the victim at the time of the offense, * the victim was older than 14 years of age at the time of the offense, * the actor was not at the time registered or required to register for life as a sex offender, * the conduct did not constitute incest, and * neither actor nor victim would commit bigamy by marrying the other (in other words, neither was married to a third person). A similar affirmative defense exists in the Texas Penal Code for the related crime of "continuous sexual abuse of a young child or children". Any defense under either law, however, does not apply to the separate crime of "improper educator/student relationship", or for "aggravated sexual assault" which is the forcible rape statute of Texas law. :( You're Texan? Dude, I feel sorry for you. XD |
Click on this. I dare you. | MAL Fantasy Football League | Currently Watching List RWBY Club. RWBY is anime. Deal with it. Visionaries are always mocked by fools. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:23 PM
#25
Sayalol said: You just seemed to be very discontent with your life, like an atheist.llxwarbirdxll said: Sayalol said: Are you happy with your life right now?llxwarbirdxll said: mightykid218 said: No, when you rape dead people, you hurt their souls. Would you like it if someone just walked up to you and violated your soul? I think not.Ontario said: It's better than being attracted to dead bodies, I s'pose. Meh, I disagree. Can't hurt dead people mentally or physically, but you can do both to little kids. I think necrophilia, from a very morally lackingless standpoint, is one of the kinder fetishes out there. Na, even by a religious standard it wouldn't work like that. I mean, if you believe nothing will happen to you when you die, and you're just dead, nothing else, then you wouldn't know your body is being violated because you're dead, no soul. Christian, either you'll be in heaven and be too happy in paradise to care; in hell, and being tortured to much to notice, or in purgetory, to busy in the fire being cleansed to want to know. Buddihsim, you'll ascend, so there will be no body, That one religion, you'll be with 72 virgins, so you wont care...The list goes on.... Completely happy, why do you ask? |
Sep 2, 2009 9:24 PM
#26
KyuuA4 said: You're Texan? Dude, I feel sorry for you. XD Oh, come now, Texas isn't that bad. I happen to live in San Antonio. Not a Texan how ever, but I still live here. Just depends on where you are. Though, to stay on topic. The attraction to a prepubescent child depends on your culture, or possibly era..I mean..look at Rome, Greece, etc...All of them where Bisexual, child molesting, male/female raping citizens and people found this to be perfectly acceptable. llxwarbirdxll said: You just seemed to be very discontent with your life, like an atheist.Completely happy, why do you ask? I do? Not sure how....maybe it's just me. |
L2 Search - http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs48/f/2009/236/3/9/L2_Search_by_Siya_Akuma.jpg We're all getting trolled by Mayans. They probably thought "Fuck this shit, let's end the calendar and say shit's gonna go down." |
Sep 2, 2009 9:25 PM
#27
This thread makes me giggle. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:25 PM
#28
llxwarbirdxll said: You just seemed to be very discontent with your life, like an atheist. Eh? |
"When he will, the weary world Of the senses closely curled Like a serpent round his heart Shakes herself and stands apart." - A.C., Equinox I/I |
Sep 2, 2009 9:25 PM
#29
rTz said: llxwarbirdxll said: You just seemed to be very discontent with your life, like an atheist. Eh? Don't turn this into a religion debate. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:26 PM
#30
-Shio said: rTz said: llxwarbirdxll said: You just seemed to be very discontent with your life, like an atheist. Eh? Don't turn this into a religion debate. I agree with this..Religion makes me gag..not giggle and I want to giggle. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:27 PM
#31
-Shio[82.2% Male said: ] rTz said: llxwarbirdxll said: You just seemed to be very discontent with your life, like an atheist. Eh? Don't turn this into a religion debate. I wasn't the one who brought religion into it |
"When he will, the weary world Of the senses closely curled Like a serpent round his heart Shakes herself and stands apart." - A.C., Equinox I/I |
Sep 2, 2009 9:30 PM
#32
Google: religious argument against pedophilia Funny how this is the first item listed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases |
Click on this. I dare you. | MAL Fantasy Football League | Currently Watching List RWBY Club. RWBY is anime. Deal with it. Visionaries are always mocked by fools. |
Sep 2, 2009 9:39 PM
#33
Ugh, how many times are we going to have a different thread for the same subject? |
Sep 2, 2009 9:43 PM
#34
Defiance[62.3% Male said: ]Ugh, how many times are we going to have a different thread for the same subject? Until we can disturb the rest of Khorven and he returns from the river styx |
"When he will, the weary world Of the senses closely curled Like a serpent round his heart Shakes herself and stands apart." - A.C., Equinox I/I |
Sep 2, 2009 9:45 PM
#35
Sep 2, 2009 10:20 PM
#36
yes. its best when they are young.flat and soft.. |
Sep 2, 2009 10:30 PM
#37
Akito38 said: yes. its best when they are young.flat and soft.. You're a good man...a good man. |
Sep 2, 2009 10:59 PM
#38
Uh there is no thought police so your free to be attracted to what ever you want. Just don't fuck a real one..... might end up pretty bad. I'm sure being a registered sex offender is none to fun. And if you do happen to fuck one, don't get caught. >.> Or hide her in a tent in your back yard for 18 years like that one guy. |
It doesn't think, it doesn't feel, it doesn't laugh or cry..... All it does from dusk till dawn is make the soldiers die. |
Sep 2, 2009 11:06 PM
#39
Jigero[65.5% Male said: ]Uh there is no thought police so your free to be attracted to what ever you want. Just don't fuck a real one..... might end up pretty bad. I'm sure being a registered sex offender is none to fun. And if you do happen to fuck one, don't get caught. >.> Or hide her in a tent in your back yard for 18 years like that one guy. The statute of limitations is like 5 years for sex crimes I thought, so if she consented for the last five years, could they charge him with a crime? |
"When he will, the weary world Of the senses closely curled Like a serpent round his heart Shakes herself and stands apart." - A.C., Equinox I/I |
Sep 2, 2009 11:10 PM
#40
Flibbertigibbet said: Prepubescent children disgust me, so yes it is wrong. How can you get with such disgusting creatures? Well, theoretically HOW isn't the question. Taking advantage of someone a fraction of your age is probably a cakewalk. I think the real question is why would you and is it acceptable to think such thoughts? But still, I can't see the point in getting your panties in a twist over this when we have shit like zoophiles breathing our air and all.. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the General Forum Guidelines! |
Sep 2, 2009 11:12 PM
#41
It's not morally wrong to be sexually attracted to children, but acting on these desires would bring harm to the child in question and eventually to yourself so that's wrong IMO. Of course religion would argue that lusty thoughts are just as bad as lusty actions (I believe it is quoted so somewhere in the Bible.) However I disagree because no actual harm takes place on anybody. BTW, don't go around telling this to people other than the Internet, they probably won't take to it kindly. |
Sep 2, 2009 11:17 PM
#42
I don't think could ever be sexually attracted to prepubescent children, although I think most of them are really adorable. In anime it's somewhat different. It's not like I'm attracted to the anime characters, I just think the forbidden love thing between a man and a young boy is veeery hot. In really life it would probably be kind of sick, but in anime it's hot. I real life I do like the boys, that although they are older, look fairly innocent, such as Koike Teppei, but that's only one of the kinds of guys I find attractive. |
Sep 2, 2009 11:18 PM
#43
Defiance said: Ugh, how many times are we going to have a different thread for the same subject? Those other threads weren't about prepubescent children. lol @ the necrophilia discussion. |
Old avatar and sig retired for now. |
Sep 2, 2009 11:19 PM
#44
If this song were to be made today -- it's an impossibility: Nika-senpai said: Of course religion would argue that lusty thoughts are just as bad as lusty actions (I believe it is quoted so somewhere in the Bible.) However I disagree because no actual harm takes place on anybody. Good ole' Sixth Commandment. Not just adultery, but also various forms of inappropriate sexual thought and actions. |
Click on this. I dare you. | MAL Fantasy Football League | Currently Watching List RWBY Club. RWBY is anime. Deal with it. Visionaries are always mocked by fools. |
Sep 2, 2009 11:23 PM
#45
rTz said: Jigero[65.5% Male said: ]Uh there is no thought police so your free to be attracted to what ever you want. Just don't fuck a real one..... might end up pretty bad. I'm sure being a registered sex offender is none to fun. And if you do happen to fuck one, don't get caught. >.> Or hide her in a tent in your back yard for 18 years like that one guy. The statute of limitations is like 5 years for sex crimes I thought, so if she consented for the last five years, could they charge him with a crime? actually he only got charged with illegal imprisonment and kidnapping and rape Oh and because her was sex offender before hand, he wasn't aloud to be near children and he had 2 kids with her, so that got tacked on too |
JigeroSep 2, 2009 11:29 PM
It doesn't think, it doesn't feel, it doesn't laugh or cry..... All it does from dusk till dawn is make the soldiers die. |
Sep 2, 2009 11:25 PM
#46
Is there even an expiration to the status of "Sex Offender"? |
Click on this. I dare you. | MAL Fantasy Football League | Currently Watching List RWBY Club. RWBY is anime. Deal with it. Visionaries are always mocked by fools. |
Sep 2, 2009 11:33 PM
#47
ukonkivi said: Then I wonder what this all too familiar feeling is.Defiance said: Ugh, how many times are we going to have a different thread for the same subject? Those other threads weren't about prepubescent children. EDIT: not to mention practically any thread that even brings up the word loli is bound to be locked. |
Sep 3, 2009 12:03 AM
#48
KyuuA4 said: If this song were to be made today -- it's an impossibility: That song kicks so much ass. |
(づ°‿°.)づ |
Sep 3, 2009 12:38 AM
#49
Defiance said: ukonkivi said: Then I wonder what this all too familiar feeling is.Defiance said: Ugh, how many times are we going to have a different thread for the same subject? Those other threads weren't about prepubescent children. I do believe that the term loli necessarily implies prepubescent child. The word "loli" in that thread meant underage child, one can be underage without being prepubescent. |
Old avatar and sig retired for now. |
Sep 3, 2009 12:45 AM
#50
ukonkivi said: You're beating around the bush, the connotation was the same. Khorven even gave a picture at the top of an obviously prepubescent child to further implement this.Defiance said: ukonkivi said: Then I wonder what this all too familiar feeling is.Defiance said: Ugh, how many times are we going to have a different thread for the same subject? Those other threads weren't about prepubescent children. I do believe that the term loli necessarily implies prepubescent child. The word "loli" in that thread meant underage child, one can be underage without being prepubescent. |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
272 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |