LuckyCyborg said:velkro16 said: One thing I am kind of curious about is when their software goes bad can the Giftia be reused? I think I heard MC say that they could put a new OS on Nina but she just wouldn't have her memories. I definitely would like go see either one of two things happen.
Interesting question. Giftias being androids, and the principal endurance limitation being the life-time of correct functioning brain, and this probably being a hardware show-stepper, I suppose that they could replace the "brain-chip" and keep and/or do some maintenance to the rest of body, i.e. replacing the battery and do some repairs.
Also is do not need to have a huge business knowledge to understand that right this the Company do with the fresh retired units, before to re-sell them, as reconditioned and, for sure, cheapo androids.
LuckyCyborg said: A wonderful Anime, and I look forward for its development.
Some notes:
It's very clear that the Giftia's life-span of around 9 years, is something like "the guaranteed life-time, until the Giftia's AI starts malfunctioning" from one reason or another.
Is meaningful to note that even in the latest "safe day", a Gifitia behave and works normally.
What happen after the named Giftia pass beyond "its guaranteed life-time"? Well, I believe that it do not go right into madness like Cortana, but yet there is a huge possibility to malfunction. And those malfunctions can be (or became) very dangerous situations for the Giftia's owner(s).
In other hand, I suspect that an very example of Giftia behavior, beyond its safety life-time, is right our favorite robo-girl, Isla. In only one single Episode, she make several malfunctions, most notable and dangerous (for its human partner) being the pre-pee situation (generated by a cup of tea!), while driving in highway.
Looks like Isla passed loooooong time ago its safety life-time, and she is very probably to be, literally, 15-16 years old. Probably, out of attachment, the Terminal Service team "forgot" in act and papers, to decommission Isla at its end of safety life-time, and they preferred to keep her to do some simple tasks, like serving tea, to justify her still usefulness in the eyes of the Company superiors. Also, they being over-protective with Isla, can be very easy explained, everyone from the team knowing (or thinking) that Isla, even she is beloved, she "is not safe" to do meaningful tasks. Then, the team leader was forced to make an uneasy decision to pair Isla with Tsukasa Mizugaki, but requesting a new android will have to make the superiors to ask the usefulness of Isla, and even they to discover her situation.
The bright side, I believe to be that Isla most likely reached something like a stable state of her mind, and there will not be further damages of her behavior.
Finally, the sadness of Isla can be easy explained by its situation. She is a Company owned bot, and do not have the luxury to have a owner to eventually refuse its decommissioning, and that she'll be permitted to live along she is useful and do a meaningful work. In other hand, she known well that she passed long time ago its safety life-time and that she is malfunctioning. And she expect any time to be decommissioned, even if one of the Company clients observe that she is "expired". It is something similar with living in fear, into Death Row, with a work permission.
Most probably, her story-arc will be that the already-in-love Tsukasa Mizugaki will manage to demonstrate her that she can be "useful" just as his companion and offering her a "safe harbor", managing to buy her from the Company, maybe as a cheapo used item, with the huge bless of the co-workers.
Well, even today, the most data we can store on a medium is 297 terabyte and this is an experimental optical disc that reads and writes even slower than old fashioned tape drives.
The human brain is said to room around 2.5 Petabytes which is 8-9 times as much, and reads/writes at near the speed of light.
It's obvious that data integrity would be a huge issue in an android made to mimic a human. Even with error-correcting flash based memory, we're looking at, with technology we can "see" the horizon of in the future, a maximum of 0,5TB per volumetric inch. So if they used 70% of the internal space of an android for JUST memory and memory controllers with such technology, (3D or even 4D NAND flash with ECC) it still wouldn't reach the capacity of the human brain or even half of that.
Unlike computer storage, brain storage is always written to as you can not turn off or pause your senses. Even in a computer environment where you CAN do these things, consumer flash tires out and dies within 10-20 years for a power user.
So, let's say for argument's sake that they could have half the capacity of a human brain in a giftia. (Memory lifespan of 40 years, error-free lifespan of 20 years) Then a big portion, maybe even half of THAT has to be overprovisioned (effectively back-up sectors that kick in when an active cell dies) and that leaves the error-free lifespan to 10 years.
So 9 years is plausible, with the best possible memory technology we know we can make in the future today.
Sidenote: there is biological as well as crystalline-based memory in research right now that is possibly going to double these estimates, but the timeline for that is impossible to predict and is very very far into the future. |