New
Oct 4, 2008 5:06 AM
#1
So, I was browsing Wikipedia the other day, the infamous Wikipedia tree eventually got me from a mathematics subject eventually to reading the fine details about Alexi Laiho's life. There I found: Alexi has had some personal problems. Between the first two Children of Bodom albums, Something Wild and Hatebreeder, he attempted to commit suicide by taking 15 tranquillizers mixed with a few shots of whiskey. Fortunately, he was discovered and taken to a hospital in Espoo to recuperate. I can't claim complete impartial nature on this subject after being held in a small room with no objects but a bed for five days in a row with the purpose to praevent me from committing suicide but I sincerely believe this to be one of the most atrocious aspects to today's society, I am not entitled completely the right to my own life, euthanasia is possible here, but then I have to prove I suffer inhumanely with no hope of recovery, as I quite simply refuse to take any medication as it compromises my artistic ability and speed of logical thought, I am already not allowed the right to end my own life. And so more people, effectively as if the government here own my body, has granted its property when I was born and I just loan it from them for every-day use and they decide ultimately the restrictions. One also hears those redundant arguments like 'Yeah.. but maybe things in the future will be better.' well, maybe they will, even if they're sure they will be in two years, you're still going to go through two years of misery to then have slightly less misery or a 'normal life', why not end it? For some reason people seem to think that staying alive is the highest achievable and should take præcedence above all other, but why really? |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 5:41 AM
#2
I think people have the right to die, but I only encourage it on people I hate. And it would suck to have someone you love being gone. Generally, I think it's better to help people live, even if it's by their own hands they're dying. I say counseling, and if they still want to die after that, let them die. Life is a privileged anyway, and if they don't respect that privileged and hold it to any value, well there's only so much you can and should spend the time doing to convince them otherwise. It's really a case by case thing, though. |
![]() Old avatar and sig retired for now. |
Oct 4, 2008 6:49 AM
#3
As it has been said already, feelings are fleeting, and I too, have experienced times when I felt a longing for oblivion. But those feelings may pass, and you may find yourself glad that you didn't terminate yourself. Ideally, I would have really suicidal people forced through some counseling first, and if they still really yearned for death, they should be given the appropriate pills and a booking for the crematorium. Forcing people to live when they don't want to is a cruel and selfish thing to do in my opinion, and if anyone could terminate themselves with prescription drugs, posers from certain sub cultures probably wouldn't bother playing with death anymore, as suicide would be a commonly accepted thing rather than a shocking way to rebel and gain attention. |
Oct 4, 2008 6:54 AM
#4
I have never once wanted oblivion.:O There's just been times I thought the afterlife might be cooler. |
![]() Old avatar and sig retired for now. |
Oct 4, 2008 7:00 AM
#5
Baman said: As it has been said already, feelings are fleeting, and I too, have experienced times when I felt a longing for oblivion. But those feelings may pass, and you may find yourself glad that you didn't terminate yourself. Ideally, I would have really suicidal people forced through some counseling first, and if they still really yearned for death, they should be given the appropriate pills and a booking for the crematorium. Forcing people to live when they don't want to is a cruel and selfish thing to do in my opinion, and if anyone could terminate themselves with prescription drugs, posers from certain sub cultures probably wouldn't bother playing with death anymore, as suicide would be a commonly accepted thing rather than a shocking way to rebel and gain attention. This. I agree. Every word of it. |
You can find me on IRC. |
Oct 4, 2008 8:17 AM
#6
As far as I am concerned, everyone has the right to die. However, it is not a decision to be taken lightly. A couple of people have already mentioned the transience of such feelings, so I think I agree with Baman in the sense that people who may wish to end their lives should talk it through with someone first. But I wouldn't force suicidal people to talk to anyone, that would probably just make them feel worse. I'd just encourage them to talk it over. It's their decision in the end. |
Your search on "Oran Solus" returned the following quotes: "Oran Solus? I know him. What a wanker. He still owes me a tenner." Oscar Wilde "Oran, you're so intelligent and awesome <3" Bakayaro "Oran's sexy." LolitaDecay "Oran is a sophisticated penguin." Drybananna "Oran is a Hand-Eye you faggots." EddieSpaghetti "Oran for Prime Minister." the_prime_one "Oran is all that is stated in his sig and more." orbitzz |
Oct 4, 2008 8:25 AM
#7
Baman said: Except, skip the counciling, especially the forced. You're sill pushing the opinion 'staying alive is what we ultimately praefer' unto them. And for fucks sake, the counciling is horrid, psychiatry is a pseudoscience and is no further than medicine was in 1200 or some-thing. And that they think they know what they talk about makes it even more frustrating, I ended up splashing my hot coco in one of their faces as I was sick of their pseudoscientific naïve realism, for fucks sake.. the entirety of today's psychiatry requires naïve realism, naïve realism is contradictory to about every major theory in physics.. they ignored my points that they just made a circular definition, had an internal inconsistency, used vague and not defined terms like 'reality' every time until I watched amused as the guy was screaming because I splashed my coco in his face, ahahah.As it has been said already, feelings are fleeting, and I too, have experienced times when I felt a longing for oblivion. But those feelings may pass, and you may find yourself glad that you didn't terminate yourself. Ideally, I would have really suicidal people forced through some counseling first, and if they still really yearned for death, they should be given the appropriate pills and a booking for the crematorium. Forcing people to live when they don't want to is a cruel and selfish thing to do in my opinion, and if anyone could terminate themselves with prescription drugs, posers from certain sub cultures probably wouldn't bother playing with death anymore, as suicide would be a commonly accepted thing rather than a shocking way to rebel and gain attention. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 9:28 AM
#8
I firmly agree that one has the right to die if they so choose, but outside of someone with a painful terminal illness or someone in a concentration camp, I can't see it being a correct choice. The assumption that one will necessarily be unhappy is arbitrary, outside of the examples I mentioned. |
Oct 4, 2008 9:34 AM
#9
Lols you kids are so emo. Wait are we talking about euthanasia or just plain suicide cause I have nothing better to do than bitch about my life all day to head shrink who's just counting the checks? |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the General Guidelines! |
Oct 4, 2008 9:35 AM
#10
khorven said: Except, skip the counciling, especially the forced. You're sill pushing the opinion 'staying alive is what we ultimately praefer' unto them. And for fucks sake, the counciling is horrid, psychiatry is a pseudoscience and is no further than medicine was in 1200 or some-thing. And that they think they know what they talk about makes it even more frustrating, I ended up splashing my hot coco in one of their faces as I was sick of their pseudoscientific naïve realism, for fucks sake.. the entirety of today's psychiatry requires naïve realism, naïve realism is contradictory to about every major theory in physics.. they ignored my points that they just made a circular definition, had an internal inconsistency, used vague and not defined terms like 'reality' every time until I watched amused as the guy was screaming because I splashed my coco in his face, ahahah. Pseudoscientific naïve realism is really what most people are best at... But if it's so bad as you say, then the counseling should maybe try to focus on other things. I'm sure I too would have been mighty pissed if some "expert" tried talking me into staying alive if I really didn't want to, especially if he highlighted some naive and optimistic views. I'd think that perhaps a more nihilistic approach might be better in some cases, at least, speaking out of my own view on life. Life might be shitty sometimes, but it really doesn't matter, as nothing really matters. One could choose death, but then one would miss out on all the hilarities happening around the world. Human beings are rotten creatures, and merely watching the spectacles we create makes, in my opinion, life worth living. It's a tragedy, it's a comedy. At least, the psychiatrists should try not to always focus on a positive view when the person in question obviously have a negative view on everything. |
Oct 4, 2008 9:38 AM
#11
Baman said: khorven said: Except, skip the counciling, especially the forced. You're sill pushing the opinion 'staying alive is what we ultimately praefer' unto them. And for fucks sake, the counciling is horrid, psychiatry is a pseudoscience and is no further than medicine was in 1200 or some-thing. And that they think they know what they talk about makes it even more frustrating, I ended up splashing my hot coco in one of their faces as I was sick of their pseudoscientific naïve realism, for fucks sake.. the entirety of today's psychiatry requires naïve realism, naïve realism is contradictory to about every major theory in physics.. they ignored my points that they just made a circular definition, had an internal inconsistency, used vague and not defined terms like 'reality' every time until I watched amused as the guy was screaming because I splashed my coco in his face, ahahah. Pseudoscientific naïve realism is really what most people are best at... But if it's so bad as you say, then the counseling should maybe try to focus on other things. I'm sure I too would have been mighty pissed if some "expert" tried talking me into staying alive if I really didn't want to, especially if he highlighted some naive and optimistic views. I'd think that perhaps a more nihilistic approach might be better in some cases, at least, speaking out of my own view on life. Life might be shitty sometimes, but it really doesn't matter, as nothing really matters. One could choose death, but then one would miss out on all the hilarities happening around the world. Human beings are rotten creatures, and merely watching the spectacles we create makes, in my opinion, life worth living. It's a tragedy, it's a comedy. At least, the psychiatrists should try not to always focus on a positive view when the person in question obviously have a negative view on everything. Gratz you are a bonified sociopath. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the General Guidelines! |
Oct 4, 2008 9:42 AM
#12
NewTypeX said: Gratz you are a bonified sociopath. I'll take that as a compliment :D |
Oct 4, 2008 9:45 AM
#13
Baman said: Count me in.NewTypeX said: Gratz you are a bonified sociopath. I'll take that as a compliment :D |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 10:02 AM
#14
people have the right to die. No doubt. But i feel that the one who uses that right is acting in cowardice. Although they hold that object in their hands, whatever it may be, ready to spill their own blood, unafraid/ uncaring of the circumstances, ultimately, they're still running away/turning their backs from something.but hmm, because of that same cowardice, they could refrain from doing it. |
![]() |
Oct 4, 2008 10:17 AM
#15
jrsygrl0601 said: Coward from what? Afraid to do what?people have the right to die. No doubt. But i feel that the one who uses that right is acting in cowardice. Although they hold that object in their hands, whatever it may be, ready to spill their own blood, unafraid/ uncaring of the circumstances, ultimately, they're still running away/turning their backs from something.but hmm, because of that same cowardice, they could refrain from doing it. 'Afraid' of giving it another shot and trying to establish to live slightly better but still a lot worse? I'd say more tired of trying? |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 10:29 AM
#16
Wow great timing for this post. I had a friend who killed herself two days ago. She hung herself. No offense but suicide is selfish and people who love you have to go through hard times after your death. My friend had friends hating her, parents fighting for a long time. Yet she was pretty lucky compared to other people. People in the first world countries are spoiled to think there life is hard. People in other countries have been and are going through more rough times then you, and they don't kill themselves. So whats the point? Really your luckier then you think, so if you kill yourself your just being a selfish person. Just because you have the right to kill yourself doesn't mean it's right. I use to want to kill myself then I realized I'm pretty lucky. My cousins attempted suicide luckily one of her friends found her. As a Beatles song told me: It's getting better all the time. |
StephanBlackhawkOct 4, 2008 10:33 AM
sad |
Oct 4, 2008 10:42 AM
#17
I guess those who have never felt that way would see suicide as cowardly, and in some cases, I'd see it that way too. If someone bites the dust because they have lots of debts or the like, I too, would see it as slightly cowardly, as they are running away from something instead of meeting it head on. But then again, I guess there's no reason to stay around when you know you're fucked anyway, might as well retread from a battle you know you can't win. LadyShiva said: Wow great timing for this post. I had a friend who killed herself two days ago. She hung herself. No offense but suicide is selfish and people who love you have to go through hard times after your death. My friend had friends hating her, parents fighting for a long time. Yet she was pretty lucky compared to other people. You say suicide is selfish, but wouldn't i also be selfish of a person's family to want the subject to keep on living if it really didn't want to? LadyShiva said: People in the first world countries are spoiled to think there life is hard. People in other countries have been and are going through more rough times then you, and they don't kill themselves. So whats the point? Really your luckier then you think, so if you kill yourself your just being a selfish person. It's true what you say here, but there's a simple reason behind it. You don't have time to reflect over how much your life sucks or how much you want to die when you're struggling to get enough food everyday. People of the first world don't have that problem, so they should be happy, but yet, mankind defines their existence through suffering, and when staying alive is no longer a problem, psychological, philosophical and social problems jump in. LadyShiva said: Just because you have the right to kill yourself doesn't mean it's right. I use to want to kill myself then I realized I'm pretty lucky. My cousins attempted suicide luckily one of her friends found her. As a Beatles song told me: It's getting better all the time. What is right and what is wrong? I for one, define "right" as anything benefiting me and my views, and "wrong" being the opposite. As for getting better all the time, I'll agree with you on that one. We humans never cease to amaze with our foolish and terrible acts, it's great entertainment. |
Oct 4, 2008 10:54 AM
#18
Baman said: You say suicide is selfish, but wouldn't i also be selfish of a person's family to want the subject to keep on living if it really didn't want to? Reasons for suicide are usually One: Get rid of your problems Two: Make people sad and make them regret things they did to you Also if your in debts your leaving your problems to others. Also, forget to add this before, when you die, you die, it's a mistake you can't redo. whether you're a atheist or a person who believes in God. When you kill yourself you either just die nothing happens to you and you could have had a better life then when you ended it at. Or if you believe in God you have to do your life all over again because you never finished the life you were suppose to finish. So either way you lose. |
sad |
Oct 4, 2008 10:58 AM
#19
LadyShiva said: Nope, that argument is just a reflexion of man s ineptness at empathy 'You don't know how good you have it.', it only shows how thoroughly unable humans are at realizing that people are different and achieve joy and happiness by different means than their own.Wow great timing for this post. I had a friend who killed herself two days ago. She hung herself. No offense but suicide is selfish and people who love you have to go through hard times after your death. My friend had friends hating her, parents fighting for a long time. Yet she was pretty lucky compared to other people. People in the first world countries are spoiled to think there life is hard. People in other countries have been and are going through more rough times then you, and they don't kill themselves. So whats the point? Really your luckier then you think, so if you kill yourself your just being a selfish person. Just because you have the right to kill yourself doesn't mean it's right. I use to want to kill myself then I realized I'm pretty lucky. My cousins attempted suicide luckily one of her friends found her. As a Beatles song told me: It's getting better all the time. Money, wealth, food, a roof, cloathes, it's as nothing compared to a good balance of serotonin in your brain. In fact, it's already established that œconomic status has very little effect on how happy one is, what affects it is œconomic movement. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 10:59 AM
#20
LadyShiva said: Oh, you can't undo the mistake of being alive either, the extra time you spent suffering is some-thing you cannot get back, that argument is pretty much void.Baman said: You say suicide is selfish, but wouldn't i also be selfish of a person's family to want the subject to keep on living if it really didn't want to? Reasons for suicide are usually One: Get rid of your problems Two: Make people sad and make them regret things they did to you Also if your in debts your leaving your problems to others. Also, forget to add this before, when you die, you die, it's a mistake you can't redo. whether you're a atheist or a person who believes in God. When you kill yourself you either just die nothing happens to you and you could have had a better life then when you ended it at. Or if you believe in God you have to do your life all over again because you never finished the life you were suppose to finish. So either way you lose. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 11:00 AM
#21
khorven said: LadyShiva said: Oh, you can't undo the mistake of being alive either, the extra time you spent suffering is some-thing you cannot get back, that argument is pretty much void.Baman said: You say suicide is selfish, but wouldn't i also be selfish of a person's family to want the subject to keep on living if it really didn't want to? Reasons for suicide are usually One: Get rid of your problems Two: Make people sad and make them regret things they did to you Also if your in debts your leaving your problems to others. Also, forget to add this before, when you die, you die, it's a mistake you can't redo. whether you're a atheist or a person who believes in God. When you kill yourself you either just die nothing happens to you and you could have had a better life then when you ended it at. Or if you believe in God you have to do your life all over again because you never finished the life you were suppose to finish. So either way you lose. Since when is being alive a mistake? |
sad |
Oct 4, 2008 11:03 AM
#22
LadyShiva said: Circular reasoning if I ever seen one, you're using the proposition 'being alive is good' to argue that being alive is good.khorven said: LadyShiva said: Oh, you can't undo the mistake of being alive either, the extra time you spent suffering is some-thing you cannot get back, that argument is pretty much void.Baman said: You say suicide is selfish, but wouldn't i also be selfish of a person's family to want the subject to keep on living if it really didn't want to? Reasons for suicide are usually One: Get rid of your problems Two: Make people sad and make them regret things they did to you Also if your in debts your leaving your problems to others. Also, forget to add this before, when you die, you die, it's a mistake you can't redo. whether you're a atheist or a person who believes in God. When you kill yourself you either just die nothing happens to you and you could have had a better life then when you ended it at. Or if you believe in God you have to do your life all over again because you never finished the life you were suppose to finish. So either way you lose. Since when is being alive a mistake? Of course it's a mistake if it's no fun? Being nullified is a pretty good alternative to having to cry and scream in a field every night I suppose, I could choose to do that for 60 more years and then die, or just die right now? Every moment I stall that is a mistake were it only to concern me. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 11:03 AM
#23
Oct 4, 2008 11:06 AM
#24
xXnagashiXx said: if someone wants to die, they die. And if they don't, they still do :3 |
Oct 4, 2008 11:06 AM
#25
khorven said: LadyShiva said: Circular reasoning if I ever seen one, you're using the proposition 'being alive is good' to argue that being alive is good.khorven said: LadyShiva said: Oh, you can't undo the mistake of being alive either, the extra time you spent suffering is some-thing you cannot get back, that argument is pretty much void.Baman said: You say suicide is selfish, but wouldn't i also be selfish of a person's family to want the subject to keep on living if it really didn't want to? Reasons for suicide are usually One: Get rid of your problems Two: Make people sad and make them regret things they did to you Also if your in debts your leaving your problems to others. Also, forget to add this before, when you die, you die, it's a mistake you can't redo. whether you're a atheist or a person who believes in God. When you kill yourself you either just die nothing happens to you and you could have had a better life then when you ended it at. Or if you believe in God you have to do your life all over again because you never finished the life you were suppose to finish. So either way you lose. Since when is being alive a mistake? Of course it's a mistake if it's no fun? Being nullified is a pretty good alternative to having to cry and scream in a field every night I suppose, I could choose to do that for 60 more years and then die, or just die right now? Every moment I stall that is a mistake were it only to concern me. Being alive doesn't need to be good. It can be shit. But really it was a waste for your mother to like vomit and all that for 8 months so you can go kill yourself later. |
sad |
Oct 4, 2008 11:07 AM
#26
xXnagashiXx said: Ignorance if I ever saw it, it's complete bullshit what you say here, the whole 'emo' craze kind of helpt giving people that opinion. If people want to die they don't die that easily, what people often don't realize is that suicidal people have the same biological and irrational fear of death any-one has, they simply don't like their lives that much. I make no secret of that I am relatively depressed, however I treat it as just as much a quality of me that I like women with small breasts for instance, and will only state it when it's relevant, this topic here was started after an MSN convo I had with some-one about someone who was rendered limbless after a failed attempt and was not granted euthanasia as it was ruled that there was still a small chance that that person would eventually get a better life, yah.. it reminded me of that Laiho article.idiotic topic. if someone wants to die, they die. 99% of the time they just end up takin bullshit ways |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 11:07 AM
#27
khorven said: jrsygrl0601 said: Coward from what? Afraid to do what?people have the right to die. No doubt. But i feel that the one who uses that right is acting in cowardice. Although they hold that object in their hands, whatever it may be, ready to spill their own blood, unafraid/ uncaring of the circumstances, ultimately, they're still running away/turning their backs from something.but hmm, because of that same cowardice, they could refrain from doing it. 'Afraid' of giving it another shot and trying to establish to live slightly better but still a lot worse? I'd say more tired of trying? they are not a coward, they're just demonstrating cowardice at that moment, i would not wholly call them a coward if they're having some bad moments. Look, he who searches for release through suicide is ultimately turning their back on the prospect of life, for some reason only they know of, and they're only tired, because they're afraid the fight, the struggles, the whole idea of life, is ultimately not worth it, because they see the uncertainty of what's next, but the certainty of what's ahead. They're tired of trying, in some occasions, maybe because they're uninspired, by what the world has to offer, but maybe they're just looking for some reason to live they wrong places, or a more acceptable reason, their tired of looking for some substantial reason to continue through life , because their really isn't one, except to R.I.P. , the I.P. part is the trickiest. See in my opinion, you could commit suicide and be at rest, but i'll never know if one get's to rest in peace that way, not with themselves, but with the world. D: he who commits suicide hold's some grudge against the world it seems, because the world is flawed, the child is starved, people are dying, the beauty in life, is decaying with corruption. where one could say there's beauty in nature, the other could say, that same beauty is being corrupted by mandkind. Yes we all will eventually day, but we will not all die in peace with the world. We all endure problems, so wut, one may think they've got it bad, but there's someone else who's 10x worse , who's working their arse off, going day by day, and still going through it, if they can/must do it, what makes you so special that you need not continue ? Suicide is selfish. Edit: 'xD' is added xD i just felt the need to do that. |
jrsygrl0601Oct 4, 2008 11:12 AM
![]() |
Oct 4, 2008 11:12 AM
#28
jrsygrl0601 said: Nahh, not really, the idea that your life will be better is a naïve one, humans are biologically designed to præfer to believe what they præfer to be true, also known as 'optimism', we all some-where believe and hope that it one day will be better, the bare truth is that it isn't going to be better. People who believe it is are the cowards, not of life, but of realizing the truth, like all humans, humans are afraid of the things they don't like so they believe true what they præfer as a substitute.khorven said: jrsygrl0601 said: Coward from what? Afraid to do what?people have the right to die. No doubt. But i feel that the one who uses that right is acting in cowardice. Although they hold that object in their hands, whatever it may be, ready to spill their own blood, unafraid/ uncaring of the circumstances, ultimately, they're still running away/turning their backs from something.but hmm, because of that same cowardice, they could refrain from doing it. 'Afraid' of giving it another shot and trying to establish to live slightly better but still a lot worse? I'd say more tired of trying? they are not a coward, they're just demonstrating cowardice at that moment, i would not wholly call them a coward if they're having some bad moments. Look, he who searches for release through suicide is ultimately turning their back on the prospect of life, for some reason only they know of, and they're only tired, because they're afraid the fight, the struggles, the whole idea of life, is ultimately not worth it, because they see the uncertainty of what's next, but the certainty of what's ahead. They're tired of trying, in some occasions, maybe because they're uninspired, by what the world has to offer, but maybe they're just looking for some reason to live they wrong places, or a more acceptable reason, their tired of looking for some substantial reason to continue through life , because their really isn't one, except to R.I.P. , the I.P. part is the trickiest. See in my opinion, you could commit suicide and be at rest, but i'll never know if one get's to rest in peace that way, not with themselves, but with the world. D: he who commits suicide hold's some grudge against the world it seems, because the world is flawed, the child is starved, people are dying, the beauty in life, is decaying with corruption. where one could say there's beauty in nature, the other could say, that same beauty is being corrupted by mandkind. Yes we all will eventually day, but we will not all die in peace with the world. We all endure problems, so wut, one may think they've got it bad, but there's someone else who's 10x worse , who's working their arse off, going day by day, and still going through it, if they can/must do it, what makes you so special that you need not continue ? Suicide is selfish. The most brilliant minds in the history of man weren't very happy, and that's for little more than that they are objective, man sees the world through a pink filter alas, evolved like that because man is then better able to survive when it cannot see all that is wrong. 'Always look on the bright side of life' is in terminis 'Ignorance is bliss'. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 11:14 AM
#29
Also. Man has yet to know the difference of Happiness and Pleasure. |
sad |
Oct 4, 2008 11:15 AM
#30
jrsygrl0601 said: he who commits suicide hold's some grudge against the world it seems, because the world is flawed, the child is starved, people are dying, the beauty in life, is decaying with corruption. Destroying the world is pretty hard for one man to do, so suicide might be an easier option. That's what I always think when I see those badguys in fiction that want to destroy the world. Better don the suit of the Anon and laugh the world in it's face, I say. War, famine, death, every time is funny time. |
Oct 4, 2008 11:25 AM
#31
I strongly believe that people have the right to die, its a basic human right. I think suicide is a much better option for many people than poisoning themselves with psychotropic drugs. I do have a major problem if people cause inconveniences for society when choosing to die (like jumping in front of the metro and delaying everyone), so there should be fines to the surviving families in order to have people do it where it is less disruptive. |
Oct 4, 2008 11:34 AM
#32
khorven said: jrsygrl0601 said: Nahh, not really, the idea that your life will be better is a naïve one, humans are biologically designed to præfer to believe what they præfer to be true, also known as 'optimism', we all some-where believe and hope that it one day will be better, the bare truth is that it isn't going to be better. People who believe it is are the cowards, not of life, but of realizing the truth, like all humans, humans are afraid of the things they don't like so they believe true what they præfer as a substitute.khorven said: jrsygrl0601 said: Coward from what? Afraid to do what?people have the right to die. No doubt. But i feel that the one who uses that right is acting in cowardice. Although they hold that object in their hands, whatever it may be, ready to spill their own blood, unafraid/ uncaring of the circumstances, ultimately, they're still running away/turning their backs from something.but hmm, because of that same cowardice, they could refrain from doing it. 'Afraid' of giving it another shot and trying to establish to live slightly better but still a lot worse? I'd say more tired of trying? they are not a coward, they're just demonstrating cowardice at that moment, i would not wholly call them a coward if they're having some bad moments. Look, he who searches for release through suicide is ultimately turning their back on the prospect of life, for some reason only they know of, and they're only tired, because they're afraid the fight, the struggles, the whole idea of life, is ultimately not worth it, because they see the uncertainty of what's next, but the certainty of what's ahead. They're tired of trying, in some occasions, maybe because they're uninspired, by what the world has to offer, but maybe they're just looking for some reason to live they wrong places, or a more acceptable reason, their tired of looking for some substantial reason to continue through life , because their really isn't one, except to R.I.P. , the I.P. part is the trickiest. See in my opinion, you could commit suicide and be at rest, but i'll never know if one get's to rest in peace that way, not with themselves, but with the world. D: he who commits suicide hold's some grudge against the world it seems, because the world is flawed, the child is starved, people are dying, the beauty in life, is decaying with corruption. where one could say there's beauty in nature, the other could say, that same beauty is being corrupted by mandkind. Yes we all will eventually day, but we will not all die in peace with the world. We all endure problems, so wut, one may think they've got it bad, but there's someone else who's 10x worse , who's working their arse off, going day by day, and still going through it, if they can/must do it, what makes you so special that you need not continue ? Suicide is selfish. The most brilliant minds in the history of man weren't very happy, and that's for little more than that they are objective, man sees the world through a pink filter alas, evolved like that because man is then better able to survive when it cannot see all that is wrong. 'Always look on the bright side of life' is in terminis 'Ignorance is bliss'. but homie, i never once said it would be better :P , i just said, that we live to die, but how we die, determines the peace we are in. In suicide, you're at peace with yourself (you're adamant in your stance, ready to take action, in most times) however, i doubt that you're at peace with the world. It has nothing to do with optimism, or a happy, better life. Happiness is ephemeral and fleeting, i know that. So " man sees the world through a pink filter alas, evolved like that because man is then better able to survive when it cannot see all that is wrong. 'Always look on the bright side of life' is in terminis 'Ignorance is bliss'" That's true, i don't disagree with you there :P But perception is reality. It depends on how one defines bliss. |
![]() |
Oct 4, 2008 11:51 AM
#33
khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: Ignorance if I ever saw it, it's complete bullshit what you say here, the whole 'emo' craze kind of helpt giving people that opinion. If people want to die they don't die that easily, what people often don't realize is that suicidal people have the same biological and irrational fear of death any-one has, they simply don't like their lives that much. I make no secret of that I am relatively depressed, however I treat it as just as much a quality of me that I like women with small breasts for instance, and will only state it when it's relevant, this topic here was started after an MSN convo I had with some-one about someone who was rendered limbless after a failed attempt and was not granted euthanasia as it was ruled that there was still a small chance that that person would eventually get a better life, yah.. it reminded me of that Laiho article.idiotic topic. if someone wants to die, they die. 99% of the time they just end up takin bullshit ways Ignorance? I'm probably far more qualified in the issue than you are with your common highly contradictory argument. A man's right to die is fully compromised by their fear; thus, they might take action to commit suicide without pure intentions of doing so. There still may be a slight hanging feeling that they might not be making the right decision. Given the correlation between doubt and method of suicide, those who do not take actions extreme enough to die will be taken away their right to do so due to the doubt that is often still present and the possibility that they still might be 'saved.' However, those who truly wish to do commit suicide will not have a problem dieing in the majority of situations. |
Oct 4, 2008 12:14 PM
#34
Baman said: i never said they want to destroy the world xDjrsygrl0601 said: he who commits suicide hold's some grudge against the world it seems, because the world is flawed, the child is starved, people are dying, the beauty in life, is decaying with corruption. Destroying the world is pretty hard for one man to do, so suicide might be an easier option. That's what I always think when I see those badguys in fiction that want to destroy the world. Better don the suit of the Anon and laugh the world in it's face, I say. War, famine, death, every time is funny time. "Destroying the world is pretty hard for one man to do, so suicide might be an easier option." In suicide one only destroys themselves, their physical self. not destroying the world, because you know as well as i do, that too few people in this world care about anyone else :P, so in commiting suicide, you kinda fail if your only point is to destroy the world xD , people won't be miserable, and maybe that's the reason why people feel they're insignificant, but still. GRUDGE - feeling of resentment,rancor, bitterness War, famine, and death are far from funny when you are in the war or have gone through the war and come back shell shocked with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) , or when you're famished because you haven't eaten for weeks. You know when one dies, the laughter is gone. People seem to laugh at other peoples misery, and then complain, when they're having problems and no one comes to the rescue (not all people of course, there's always exceptions to rules) but majority. Then they say that others are cruel, hypocritical they be, and they shouldn't be, but contradictions and hypocracy are a part of life :O xD wait, i forgot my point xDerrrm @_______@ |
![]() |
Oct 4, 2008 12:20 PM
#35
xXnagashiXx said: I doubt there is a person on the fucking planet more qualified in human psyche than I am in all due arrogance¹. The gargantuan flaw in psychological methods is the sheer number of self-fulfilling prophecies in diagnose-techniques, in fact, a lot of the criteria were especially added because people kept denying. it, it's so easy to solve when just then making 'subject denies' another criteria. Psychiatry and psychology are 'sciences' which are about seventy years old and they make the same mistake any science did at those ages, they are working with leeches currently, and of course people don't realise this, as humans never do, the doctors of mediæval times who worked with leeches and dubious methods didn't realize that what they did was flawed, the alchemists didn't, the astrologists didn't, the early physicists didn't, and most likely the current physicists also don't realize where they make some grave mistakes still. The current model psychology works with is thoroughly flawed, for fucks sake, it requires naïve realism, it requires problematic conjunctions such as 'reality' and 'distorted', all of which have shown to not exist already in hard sciences, this alone should be proof enough that it's flawed, and the funny part is that they openly admit that they were completely flawed as little as 20 years back. That's unacceptable to me for people who have authority, I said in that room talking to those people. 'That's a circular reasoning.', 'That requires naïve realism.', 'What is this 'real', you speak of, define it please?', which they ignored as too complicated and making a fuzz out of small points.. and when I finally got really pissed and pored a hot beverage over that guy I was 'aggressive' while I did so with a calm face and the question 'Are you going to behave now?' to it.. they do not even recognise the difference between aggression, hatred, and anger or feel it is insignificant, the flaws within their models are drastic for the simple reason they require naïve realism and that these people have authority is as dangerous as that mediæval doctors had them. The flaw with psychology is that you can't look into some-one's mind and have to go by what they tell you, and if it contradicts that which you claim, which happens all too often, you can just say that they lie or don't know themselves.. which they some-times do though, but you can never check.khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: Ignorance if I ever saw it, it's complete bullshit what you say here, the whole 'emo' craze kind of helpt giving people that opinion. If people want to die they don't die that easily, what people often don't realize is that suicidal people have the same biological and irrational fear of death any-one has, they simply don't like their lives that much. I make no secret of that I am relatively depressed, however I treat it as just as much a quality of me that I like women with small breasts for instance, and will only state it when it's relevant, this topic here was started after an MSN convo I had with some-one about someone who was rendered limbless after a failed attempt and was not granted euthanasia as it was ruled that there was still a small chance that that person would eventually get a better life, yah.. it reminded me of that Laiho article.idiotic topic. if someone wants to die, they die. 99% of the time they just end up takin bullshit ways Ignorance? I'm probably far more qualified in the issue than you are with your common highly contradictory argument. A man's right to die is fully compromised by their fear; thus, they might take action to commit suicide without pure intentions of doing so. There still may be a slight hanging feeling that they might not be making the right decision. Given the correlation between doubt and method of suicide, those who do not take actions extreme enough to die will be taken away their right to do so due to the doubt that is often still present and the possibility that they still might be 'saved.' However, those who truly wish to do commit suicide will not have a problem dieing in the majority of situations. 1: Savant, see for yourself if you believe. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 12:41 PM
#36
right to die ? this thread is dead D: D: U_____U |
![]() |
Oct 4, 2008 1:05 PM
#37
if you want to kill your self no one should be a loud to stop you its your life do with it as you please. |
Stay thirsty, my friends. |
Oct 4, 2008 1:30 PM
#38
*Kills himself after reading this thread* I like killing myself it makes me feel Godly. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the General Guidelines! |
Oct 4, 2008 1:34 PM
#39
Well, you know what they say, only God decides when a life end and twelve random laymen at law being picked from the streets. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 2:08 PM
#40
jrsygrl0601 said: i never said they want to destroy the world xD In suicide one only destroys themselves, their physical self. not destroying the world, because you know as well as i do, that too few people in this world care about anyone else :P, so in commiting suicide, you kinda fail if your only point is to destroy the world xD , people won't be miserable, and maybe that's the reason why people feel they're insignificant, but still. But if you destroyed the world, you would also die. And if you die, the world is gone for you, so in effect it's really the same thing. Only, if you only kill yourself, everyone else is free to go about with their business without needing some heroes to rescue the world from the schemes of the mad villain. But that would hardly make 26 episodes would it >__>' jrsygrl0601 said: War, famine, and death are far from funny when you are in the war or have gone through the war and come back shell shocked with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) , or when you're famished because you haven't eaten for weeks. You know when one dies, the laughter is gone. People seem to laugh at other peoples misery, and then complain, when they're having problems and no one comes to the rescue (not all people of course, there's always exceptions to rules) but majority. Then they say that others are cruel, hypocritical they be, and they shouldn't be, but contradictions and hypocracy are a part of life :O xD wait, i forgot my point xDerrrm @_______@ Niccolo Machiavelli said: Of mankind we may say in general they are fickle, hypocritical, and greedy of gain. Why should one not laugh at humanity's folly? Humans are tragical beings at best. Instead of taking anything serious, I choose to laugh at all the tragedies in the world. What else can I do? I can not stop war and hunger, no one can, no one will, they are products of human nature. We are as cruel as we are beautiful, and as tragic as we are comical. Hehehe. |
Oct 4, 2008 2:41 PM
#41
Yeah, people have the right to die. But you know..it's sad. All that cheesy crap about life is meant to be both hard and good and that only moving through the hardships will you meet with good things can be true. Plus, despite the fact that we "own the right to do what we want with our lives" our suicide will affect other people whether you think so or not. Anybody who has seen somebody kill themselves or saw a corpse that died from suicide will have their lives changed. What's worse is if you still have family members or a lover. When you're so desperate to die, obviously thinking about other people's feelings may not be the first thing on your mind but still... when a person doesn't kill themselves, they're not only "saving" themselves. Well.. that's just what I think. |
"I've read so much manga that at times my mind works in comic panels and dramatically expressed chibis. I'm both ashamed and amused by this." |
Oct 4, 2008 3:11 PM
#42
khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: I doubt there is a person on the fucking planet more qualified in human psyche than I am in all due arrogance¹. The gargantuan flaw in psychological methods is the sheer number of self-fulfilling prophecies in diagnose-techniques, in fact, a lot of the criteria were especially added because people kept denying. it, it's so easy to solve when just then making 'subject denies' another criteria. Psychiatry and psychology are 'sciences' which are about seventy years old and they make the same mistake any science did at those ages, they are working with leeches currently, and of course people don't realise this, as humans never do, the doctors of mediæval times who worked with leeches and dubious methods didn't realize that what they did was flawed, the alchemists didn't, the astrologists didn't, the early physicists didn't, and most likely the current physicists also don't realize where they make some grave mistakes still. The current model psychology works with is thoroughly flawed, for fucks sake, it requires naïve realism, it requires problematic conjunctions such as 'reality' and 'distorted', all of which have shown to not exist already in hard sciences, this alone should be proof enough that it's flawed, and the funny part is that they openly admit that they were completely flawed as little as 20 years back. That's unacceptable to me for people who have authority, I said in that room talking to those people. 'That's a circular reasoning.', 'That requires naïve realism.', 'What is this 'real', you speak of, define it please?', which they ignored as too complicated and making a fuzz out of small points.. and when I finally got really pissed and pored a hot beverage over that guy I was 'aggressive' while I did so with a calm face and the question 'Are you going to behave now?' to it.. they do not even recognise the difference between aggression, hatred, and anger or feel it is insignificant, the flaws within their models are drastic for the simple reason they require naïve realism and that these people have authority is as dangerous as that mediæval doctors had them. The flaw with psychology is that you can't look into some-one's mind and have to go by what they tell you, and if it contradicts that which you claim, which happens all too often, you can just say that they lie or don't know themselves.. which they some-times do though, but you can never check.khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: Ignorance if I ever saw it, it's complete bullshit what you say here, the whole 'emo' craze kind of helpt giving people that opinion. If people want to die they don't die that easily, what people often don't realize is that suicidal people have the same biological and irrational fear of death any-one has, they simply don't like their lives that much. I make no secret of that I am relatively depressed, however I treat it as just as much a quality of me that I like women with small breasts for instance, and will only state it when it's relevant, this topic here was started after an MSN convo I had with some-one about someone who was rendered limbless after a failed attempt and was not granted euthanasia as it was ruled that there was still a small chance that that person would eventually get a better life, yah.. it reminded me of that Laiho article.idiotic topic. if someone wants to die, they die. 99% of the time they just end up takin bullshit ways Ignorance? I'm probably far more qualified in the issue than you are with your common highly contradictory argument. A man's right to die is fully compromised by their fear; thus, they might take action to commit suicide without pure intentions of doing so. There still may be a slight hanging feeling that they might not be making the right decision. Given the correlation between doubt and method of suicide, those who do not take actions extreme enough to die will be taken away their right to do so due to the doubt that is often still present and the possibility that they still might be 'saved.' However, those who truly wish to do commit suicide will not have a problem dieing in the majority of situations. 1: Savant, see for yourself if you believe. It seems as if you looked at the first statement I made and ignored everything else of what I said. And as for the the limitations of psychology... psychology is no longer a purely soft science. With the advances in technology made every day, we get closer and closer towards making it a hard science. While it may be nowhere near perfect now, we're continuously making progress in these terms. Essentially, scientists one day hope to pin down the exact though processes of humans by analyzing the metabolic reactions in context with the genetic coding of an individual... quite a scary concept. |
Oct 4, 2008 3:19 PM
#43
xXnagashiXx said: That's the point, you continually make progress... every day psychology finds some-thing which refutes what was thought yesterday, and the next day again that will occur. Of course this needn't be taken in literal 'days', but that's why it's so risky to put faith into it.khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: I doubt there is a person on the fucking planet more qualified in human psyche than I am in all due arrogance¹. The gargantuan flaw in psychological methods is the sheer number of self-fulfilling prophecies in diagnose-techniques, in fact, a lot of the criteria were especially added because people kept denying. it, it's so easy to solve when just then making 'subject denies' another criteria. Psychiatry and psychology are 'sciences' which are about seventy years old and they make the same mistake any science did at those ages, they are working with leeches currently, and of course people don't realise this, as humans never do, the doctors of mediæval times who worked with leeches and dubious methods didn't realize that what they did was flawed, the alchemists didn't, the astrologists didn't, the early physicists didn't, and most likely the current physicists also don't realize where they make some grave mistakes still. The current model psychology works with is thoroughly flawed, for fucks sake, it requires naïve realism, it requires problematic conjunctions such as 'reality' and 'distorted', all of which have shown to not exist already in hard sciences, this alone should be proof enough that it's flawed, and the funny part is that they openly admit that they were completely flawed as little as 20 years back. That's unacceptable to me for people who have authority, I said in that room talking to those people. 'That's a circular reasoning.', 'That requires naïve realism.', 'What is this 'real', you speak of, define it please?', which they ignored as too complicated and making a fuzz out of small points.. and when I finally got really pissed and pored a hot beverage over that guy I was 'aggressive' while I did so with a calm face and the question 'Are you going to behave now?' to it.. they do not even recognise the difference between aggression, hatred, and anger or feel it is insignificant, the flaws within their models are drastic for the simple reason they require naïve realism and that these people have authority is as dangerous as that mediæval doctors had them. The flaw with psychology is that you can't look into some-one's mind and have to go by what they tell you, and if it contradicts that which you claim, which happens all too often, you can just say that they lie or don't know themselves.. which they some-times do though, but you can never check.khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: Ignorance if I ever saw it, it's complete bullshit what you say here, the whole 'emo' craze kind of helpt giving people that opinion. If people want to die they don't die that easily, what people often don't realize is that suicidal people have the same biological and irrational fear of death any-one has, they simply don't like their lives that much. I make no secret of that I am relatively depressed, however I treat it as just as much a quality of me that I like women with small breasts for instance, and will only state it when it's relevant, this topic here was started after an MSN convo I had with some-one about someone who was rendered limbless after a failed attempt and was not granted euthanasia as it was ruled that there was still a small chance that that person would eventually get a better life, yah.. it reminded me of that Laiho article.idiotic topic. if someone wants to die, they die. 99% of the time they just end up takin bullshit ways Ignorance? I'm probably far more qualified in the issue than you are with your common highly contradictory argument. A man's right to die is fully compromised by their fear; thus, they might take action to commit suicide without pure intentions of doing so. There still may be a slight hanging feeling that they might not be making the right decision. Given the correlation between doubt and method of suicide, those who do not take actions extreme enough to die will be taken away their right to do so due to the doubt that is often still present and the possibility that they still might be 'saved.' However, those who truly wish to do commit suicide will not have a problem dieing in the majority of situations. 1: Savant, see for yourself if you believe. It seems as if you looked at the first statement I made and ignored everything else of what I said. And as for the the limitations of psychology... psychology is no longer a purely soft science. With the advances in technology made every day, we get closer and closer towards making it a hard science. While it may be nowhere near perfect now, we're continuously making progress in these terms. Essentially, scientists one day hope to pin down the exact though processes of humans by analyzing the metabolic reactions in context with the genetic coding of an individual... quite a scary concept. And ehh.. the post attacks the entire post. You first hinted being a psychologist, thereby granting authority to take way you say as 'true', all I needed thus was to falsify your authority for your entire post to crumble. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 3:27 PM
#44
khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: That's the point, you continually make progress... every day psychology finds some-thing which refutes what was thought yesterday, and the next day again that will occur. Of course this needn't be taken in literal 'days', but that's why it's so risky to put faith into it.khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: I doubt there is a person on the fucking planet more qualified in human psyche than I am in all due arrogance¹. The gargantuan flaw in psychological methods is the sheer number of self-fulfilling prophecies in diagnose-techniques, in fact, a lot of the criteria were especially added because people kept denying. it, it's so easy to solve when just then making 'subject denies' another criteria. Psychiatry and psychology are 'sciences' which are about seventy years old and they make the same mistake any science did at those ages, they are working with leeches currently, and of course people don't realise this, as humans never do, the doctors of mediæval times who worked with leeches and dubious methods didn't realize that what they did was flawed, the alchemists didn't, the astrologists didn't, the early physicists didn't, and most likely the current physicists also don't realize where they make some grave mistakes still. The current model psychology works with is thoroughly flawed, for fucks sake, it requires naïve realism, it requires problematic conjunctions such as 'reality' and 'distorted', all of which have shown to not exist already in hard sciences, this alone should be proof enough that it's flawed, and the funny part is that they openly admit that they were completely flawed as little as 20 years back. That's unacceptable to me for people who have authority, I said in that room talking to those people. 'That's a circular reasoning.', 'That requires naïve realism.', 'What is this 'real', you speak of, define it please?', which they ignored as too complicated and making a fuzz out of small points.. and when I finally got really pissed and pored a hot beverage over that guy I was 'aggressive' while I did so with a calm face and the question 'Are you going to behave now?' to it.. they do not even recognise the difference between aggression, hatred, and anger or feel it is insignificant, the flaws within their models are drastic for the simple reason they require naïve realism and that these people have authority is as dangerous as that mediæval doctors had them. The flaw with psychology is that you can't look into some-one's mind and have to go by what they tell you, and if it contradicts that which you claim, which happens all too often, you can just say that they lie or don't know themselves.. which they some-times do though, but you can never check.khorven said: xXnagashiXx said: Ignorance if I ever saw it, it's complete bullshit what you say here, the whole 'emo' craze kind of helpt giving people that opinion. If people want to die they don't die that easily, what people often don't realize is that suicidal people have the same biological and irrational fear of death any-one has, they simply don't like their lives that much. I make no secret of that I am relatively depressed, however I treat it as just as much a quality of me that I like women with small breasts for instance, and will only state it when it's relevant, this topic here was started after an MSN convo I had with some-one about someone who was rendered limbless after a failed attempt and was not granted euthanasia as it was ruled that there was still a small chance that that person would eventually get a better life, yah.. it reminded me of that Laiho article.idiotic topic. if someone wants to die, they die. 99% of the time they just end up takin bullshit ways Ignorance? I'm probably far more qualified in the issue than you are with your common highly contradictory argument. A man's right to die is fully compromised by their fear; thus, they might take action to commit suicide without pure intentions of doing so. There still may be a slight hanging feeling that they might not be making the right decision. Given the correlation between doubt and method of suicide, those who do not take actions extreme enough to die will be taken away their right to do so due to the doubt that is often still present and the possibility that they still might be 'saved.' However, those who truly wish to do commit suicide will not have a problem dieing in the majority of situations. 1: Savant, see for yourself if you believe. It seems as if you looked at the first statement I made and ignored everything else of what I said. And as for the the limitations of psychology... psychology is no longer a purely soft science. With the advances in technology made every day, we get closer and closer towards making it a hard science. While it may be nowhere near perfect now, we're continuously making progress in these terms. Essentially, scientists one day hope to pin down the exact though processes of humans by analyzing the metabolic reactions in context with the genetic coding of an individual... quite a scary concept. And ehh.. the post attacks the entire post. You first hinted being a psychologist, thereby granting authority to take way you say as 'true', all I needed thus was to falsify your authority for your entire post to crumble. Hah well given you basically deny psychology as a usable science, that would pretty much take away credibility to anything you say at the same time. So the most efficient way of looking at things would be to use the limited knowledge we have to the extent that we can. Even if it may not be the full truth, theories usually come before facts. |
Oct 4, 2008 4:02 PM
#45
xXnagashiXx said: I didn't, I extrapolated that's probably gravely wrong, and then showed it surely is gravely wrong as it contradicts the entirety of physics as it requires naïve realism.Hah well given you basically deny psychology as a usable science, that would pretty much take away credibility to anything you say at the same time. So the most efficient way of looking at things would be to use the limited knowledge we have to the extent that we can. Even if it may not be the full truth, theories usually come before facts. ![]() I'm more so talking about the concept of 'mental disorder' than the description and prædiction of human behaviour, but there too there is much to be desired, as you can imagine (1) worked the other way around with me, it wasn't finding out how awesome my skills with people are as some called it, it was finding out how drastically bad those of every other were, I first thought of psychologists that because they studied that they were probably awesome in it and thought of studying it once, but they aren't, they make some grave mistakes. When I was in the institute there were scenes like they couldn't get another patient calm and I walked to the scene and just started talking complete gibberish to that person who then got calm and went to her room. They looked awkward at me and I was like 'You didn't notice she wasn't paying one fucking bit attention to which words you used but solely to what intonation and nonverbal language you used?? HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT???', and that they can't is why the science fails at this moment, I used to think they were at least taught those things when they studied psychology or psychiatry, but they aren't... I have no idea what they learn there but it isn't much, it's just unbelievable that trained professionals couldn't see that she in no way registered any of the words they said and just focussed on nonverbal communication and that they supplied the complete wrong one to her. And I saw a lot more things like that in that institute. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 4, 2008 4:18 PM
#46
xXnagashiXx said: Hah well given you basically deny psychology as a usable science, that would pretty much take away credibility to anything you say at the same time. So the most efficient way of looking at things would be to use the limited knowledge we have to the extent that we can. Even if it may not be the full truth, theories usually come before facts. In fact, Quine and everyone who follows his line of empiricism (e.g. Duhem) would say that for any formal science, theories are necessary to collect data and all data is theory-laden. However ... in an exchange on views on the right to die, it might be more useful to approach the discussion from the direction of ethics, not epistemology or ontology. Many ethicists don't need to have strong opinions on what parts of science might be true -- they articulate ethical principles that can be applied no matter what science says. E.g., if your ethical axiom is, "The community is more important than the individual," you don't have to worry about whether psychology is a valid science. You can just ask, "Is suicide good for the community?" IMHO, suicide (especially for personal reasons) tends to annoy the collective sensibilities of communities, and therefore communities tend to undertake whatever measures they feel to be effective in order to discourage suicide. Justice doesn't have to enter into the question for me. I just look at which societies take which measures to discourage (or encourage) suicide. Having figured out which societies are most repulsive, I then buy an airline ticket to a better society. Leaving a forwarding address is optional. |
http://myanimelist.net/clubs.php?cid=12350 Give Toyama Koichi one spiteful, malicious vote! As a half-baked, comedic kind of authority, I don't mind lending a hand in this situation. (Bakemonogatari, Ep. 8) I'm going to go and ignore most of what you've said... - Mawootad |
Oct 4, 2008 8:22 PM
#47
I have to agree that psychology is Bull Shit. Going back to the topic of the right to die, I see that a lot of people said that it is our given right at birth. However, if you observe society, you can see that one of the worst evils that people consider is death. An easy and simplistic way to evaluate how bad war is is just to look at the death count; murder is possibly the worst crime one can commit, basically because people value life. This is why we consider the right to live a fundamental human quality. Here in Canada suicide is illegal; in other words, one does not only have the right to live, he has a duty to live I understand that a person might be willing to die in order to avoid a painful situation, but from what I've seen in this post, a person choosing suicide is likely to be overly emotional. Even if you go rationally at reaching the choice of suicide, it is still highly unlikely that the reasoning would be flawless. I mean, no offence but I don't see how death can be a rational choice (in normal situations). So no, you don't have a right to die, and society is justified in trying to prevent suicide. As for the people who posted here and are seriously considering suicide, my advice to you is to just shut up and live; sometimes thinking about the world too much is bad for you, so find something else to occupy yourself with before you do something stupid. |
A past can last a lifetime. How to Read Manga! | AnimeBytes | iMangaScans |
Oct 4, 2008 9:56 PM
#48
georgi said: You don't see it, thus it doesn't exist, arrogance in an nutshell, If any, committing suicide is a rational decision, what people often don't realize is that suicidal people have a will to live as vibrant as any person, and that will is irrational, it's evolved into humans because they then don't kill themselves or at least are cautious = more children = survival of the 'strong gene', the will to live is pretty irrational if you look at it, what's bad at being dead, I've stood on the roofs of ten story buildings looking downwards and scared to fucking death, scared for what? Scared of being emotionally neutralized instead of what I feel now? This is purely irrational and then your mind is going to fabricate shitty excuses like 'Yeah, but you're going to release your first full length in a couple of days.. you at least want to live to that don't you?' or 'But tomorrow you can leave the institute and all will be better then.' because we are simply evolved to sustain ourselves quite simply because beings that do tend to pass on their genes, it's a vicious cycle.. that death penalty is the worst penalty ever is also purely an irrational notion, it's one of the lightest, what's worse, it's one of the most dire for family and friends of him who you seek to punish. That's the most bullshit of it all, that a lot of people who illegalize suicide on grounds of 'Yeah.. it's selfish, think of the family.' at the same time often support death penalty, at least with suicide some-one gets the better end, death penalty is just giving the one you want to punish a ticket out and instead punish the innocent who are close to said one.I have to agree that psychology is Bull Shit. Going back to the topic of the right to die, I see that a lot of people said that it is our given right at birth. However, if you observe society, you can see that one of the worst evils that people consider is death. An easy and simplistic way to evaluate how bad war is is just to look at the death count; murder is possibly the worst crime one can commit, basically because people value life. This is why we consider the right to live a fundamental human quality. Here in Canada suicide is illegal; in other words, one does not only have the right to live, he has a duty to live I understand that a person might be willing to die in order to avoid a painful situation, but from what I've seen in this post, a person choosing suicide is likely to be overly emotional. Even if you go rationally at reaching the choice of suicide, it is still highly unlikely that the reasoning would be flawless. I mean, no offence but I don't see how death can be a rational choice (in normal situations). So no, you don't have a right to die, and society is justified in trying to prevent suicide. As for the people who posted here and are seriously considering suicide, my advice to you is to just shut up and live; sometimes thinking about the world too much is bad for you, so find something else to occupy yourself with before you do something stupid. 'Always look on the bright side of life / Ignorance is Bliss.' I præfer to not be that ignorant, that is why I don't take the pills, it's like a matrix, a blue pill designed to mask the truth from you, all it does is lower your perception, I wish to experience every-thing, and in the end maybe change a little, if Turing, Bruno, Russell and more got into custody or even killed for refusing to be blinded, my own sense of dignity does not allow me to take the easy way. |
Perelman, martyr |
Oct 5, 2008 5:52 AM
#49
Jumping through all the debate, my position in this is very strong: I can't say I'm against suicide, but I'm pro to "surpass your problems and learn with them". Which can be retold as "even if your life is mizerable, there's always a way to make it brighter". If you just don't have the patience to find that "brightness" go ahead and kill yourself. I will try to stop you, I will be quite sad if you do it but, in a way, it's an experience like any other. Cheesy, stupid, non-logical, whatever, suicide as a way of "quitting" is not a thing I can accept. If, by other hand, people do it to experience the death... Well, experience it, if you're able to come back please tell me how it was. ^^ |
Oct 5, 2008 6:56 AM
#50
khorven said: 'Always look on the bright side of life / Ignorance is Bliss.' I præfer to not be that ignorant, that is why I don't take the pills, it's like a matrix, a blue pill designed to mask the truth from you, all it does is lower your perception, I wish to experience every-thing, and in the end maybe change a little, if Turing, Bruno, Russell and more got into custody or even killed for refusing to be blinded, my own sense of dignity does not allow me to take the easy way. Well, ignorance might seem bad for you now, but if you are unable to handle the truth of the world and continue living, then by all means ignorance is the better choice. Don't take me wrong, though, I don't think you should take any pills; be aware of the truth but don't let it control you. |
A past can last a lifetime. How to Read Manga! | AnimeBytes | iMangaScans |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
271 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |