Forum Settings
Forums
New
Apr 29, 10:51 AM
#1

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

so who you got to win? is it biden or trump? if trump won then get ready for ukraine to be fully invaded by russia for example and this will commence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

national polls so far trump is winning https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/

also polls shows the democrats are likely to take the congress on this upcoming election https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/generic-ballot/2024/ so even if trump wins he cannot do much damage since the democrat led congress will stop him

joe biden drop out https://x.com/JoeBiden/status/1815080881981190320
degJul 21, 11:42 AM
Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members
Pages (5) [1] 2 3 » ... Last »
Apr 29, 4:36 PM
#2

Offline
Mar 2008
49068
Ugh make it stop make it stop make it stop make it stop


...okay that aside. I had already years ago created a system to predict US presidential election results. I predicted years back a D win in 2020 and 2024 as most likely outcomes. It doesnt even matter who runs because my prediction system looks at very few points. I could predict further into the future but it just gets depressing to do this and know im right how US politics is literally following a pattern of Rs and Ds in a specific sequence with only small variation on very few things influencing. I havent perfected the system though and dont even remember what I did exactly but i have a post somewhere where i explained it.
traedApr 29, 5:01 PM
Apr 30, 4:54 AM
#3

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
https://twitter.com/RBReich/status/1776996103457550563

Trump's 2nd-term economic agenda would hurt workers & kids to help the rich. He wants to:

-Cut taxes more for the rich
-Defund the IRS so the rich can cheat
-End student loan forgiveness
-End overtime rules
-Slash school lunches
-Allow child labor
-Weaken unions

Be warned.
Apr 30, 4:55 AM
#4

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
@traed are you gonna vote?
Apr 30, 5:15 AM
#5

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
trump is currently winning

Joe Biden trails Donald Trump in new national poll on 2024 election https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/28/donald-trump-joe-biden-cnn-poll/73493459007/
Apr 30, 5:30 AM
#6

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
Reply to deg
https://twitter.com/RBReich/status/1776996103457550563

Trump's 2nd-term economic agenda would hurt workers & kids to help the rich. He wants to:

-Cut taxes more for the rich
-Defund the IRS so the rich can cheat
-End student loan forgiveness
-End overtime rules
-Slash school lunches
-Allow child labor
-Weaken unions

Be warned.
@deg You actually so believe that? And you actually posted a tweet form socialist grifter? For real?

Apr 30, 5:33 AM
#7

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
Reply to Pieromysl
@deg You actually so believe that? And you actually posted a tweet form socialist grifter? For real?
@Piromysl im left leaning politically
Apr 30, 5:36 AM
#8

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
Reply to deg
@Piromysl im left leaning politically
@deg That's not really an excuse to spread lies. Like for real... Do you honestly believe that anyone wants to force elementary schoolers to work? That's so ludicrous that and outrageous and after two minutes of research it turn out that it's an obvious lie, yet you decided to blindly believe a known DNC shill. Come on..

Apr 30, 5:38 AM
#9

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
Reply to Pieromysl
@deg You actually so believe that? And you actually posted a tweet form socialist grifter? For real?
@Piromysl https://www.nelp.org/insights-research/trump-administration-moves-roll-back-child-labor-rules-expose-teen-workers-hazardous-jobs/
Apr 30, 5:52 AM

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
@deg Nowhere it mentions that little kids will be forced to work, which lying mainstream media wants you to belive. They do this disingenuous stuff literally all the time.

The regulation targeted by the Labor Department, which was first implemented by the Obama administration, prohibits 16- and 17-year-olds from independently operating power-driven patient lifts, which are commonly used in nursing homes and hospitals to move patients with mobility challenges.


You fell for the most common deception, which is only reading inflated headline, because they know perfectly well that vast majority of people will read only that and nothing else.
And believe it or not, Reich makes similar lies in other points he listed.

Apr 30, 5:56 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
Reply to Pieromysl
@deg Nowhere it mentions that little kids will be forced to work, which lying mainstream media wants you to belive. They do this disingenuous stuff literally all the time.

The regulation targeted by the Labor Department, which was first implemented by the Obama administration, prohibits 16- and 17-year-olds from independently operating power-driven patient lifts, which are commonly used in nursing homes and hospitals to move patients with mobility challenges.


You fell for the most common deception, which is only reading inflated headline, because they know perfectly well that vast majority of people will read only that and nothing else.
And believe it or not, Reich makes similar lies in other points he listed.
@Piromysl child labor is hyperbole but not really considering minors is what they call it there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_(law)
Apr 30, 6:03 AM
Offline
Dec 2022
3267
Piromysl said:
@deg You actually so believe that? And you actually posted a tweet form socialist grifter? For real?


More reason for Americans to support right wingers. TL;DR, American socialists hate everybody and themselves and it's becoming a huge problem.

Thank you for making sense in America's political reality as a person who lives 6 hours away from the US border by car.

There is a huge need to understand that as much as I hate Western Christianity, I have to admit that the human aspect of the American political system is based on that particular religious tradition. It takes courage to admit that American left wing people are evil people and their idea of left wing values doesn't apply soundly in Asia's Western democracies like in Japan or South Korea.
MalchikRepaidApr 30, 6:07 AM
Apr 30, 6:05 AM

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
deg said:
@Piromysl child labor is hyperbole but not really considering minors is what they call it there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_(law)

My point is that by using deceptive language and half truths they want you to belive that a literal elementary schoolers will be forced to work. In a society we tend to differentiate between child and teenager. They know that perfectly well, so they decided to not include the very crucial detail, that the bill is only about almost adult teenagers.

Apr 30, 6:07 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
Reply to Pieromysl
deg said:
@Piromysl child labor is hyperbole but not really considering minors is what they call it there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_(law)

My point is that by using deceptive language and half truths they want you to belive that a literal elementary schoolers will be forced to work. In a society we tend to differentiate between child and teenager. They know that perfectly well, so they decided to not include the very crucial detail, that the bill is only about almost adult teenagers.
@Piromysl its correct though they call it like that there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labor_laws_in_the_United_States
Apr 30, 6:09 AM

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
MalchikRepaid said:
Piromysl said:
@deg You actually so believe that? And you actually posted a tweet form socialist grifter? For real?


More reason for Americans to support right wingers. TL;DR, American socialists hate everybody and themselves and it's becoming a huge problem.

Thank you for making sense in America's political reality as a person who lives 6 hours away from the US border by car.

There is a huge need to understand that as much as I hate Western Christianity, I have to admit that the human aspect of the American political system is based on that particular religious tradition. It takes courage to admit that American left wing people are evil people and their idea of left wing values doesn't apply soundly in Asia's Western democracies like in Japan or South Korea.

I mean, I someone who lives in post communistic country, seeing what happens in America is very harrowing. I may sound paranoid, but they already managed to convince people that "they are rich because you are poor", which is the fundamental grift that riles people up and eventually violent revolution commences, which is how communist tyrants always come to power. 1A and 2A seems to be the only thing that is stopping them.

Apr 30, 6:10 AM

Offline
Aug 2022
2672
I see this thread is to a great start.
Mao said:
If you have to shit, shit! If you have to fart, fart!
Apr 30, 6:12 AM

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
deg said:
@Piromysl its correct though they call it like that there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labor_laws_in_the_United_States

Well, in that case it seems they are entirely lying, because bill applies only to 16-17 yo.

Apr 30, 6:14 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
Reply to Pieromysl
deg said:
@Piromysl its correct though they call it like that there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labor_laws_in_the_United_States

Well, in that case it seems they are entirely lying, because bill applies only to 16-17 yo.
@Piromysl 16-17 is considered child or minor there they can be employed but with limitations and trump and the gop wants to remove those protections
Apr 30, 6:16 AM

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
deg said:
@Piromysl 16-17 is considered child or minor there they can be employed but with limitations and trump and the gop wants to remove those protections

And that was my point. They are using deceptive language language because they want you to belive Trumps what little kids to work like in Chinese sweatshops, which is simply not true.

Apr 30, 6:18 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
Reply to Pieromysl
deg said:
@Piromysl 16-17 is considered child or minor there they can be employed but with limitations and trump and the gop wants to remove those protections

And that was my point. They are using deceptive language language because they want you to belive Trumps what little kids to work like in Chinese sweatshops, which is simply not true.
@Piromysl nah you just got different definition of minors or child than them politically and culturally
Apr 30, 6:27 AM
Offline
Dec 2022
3267
Piromysl said:
I mean, I someone who lives in post communistic country, seeing what happens in America is very harrowing. I may sound paranoid, but they already managed to convince people that "they are rich because you are poor", which is the fundamental grift that riles people up and eventually violent revolution commences, which is how communist tyrants always come to power. 1A and 2A seems to be the only thing that is stopping them.


You know it's much more hectic to see that America right now is more ideologically fervent (like a social fever) than China's Cultural Revolution (more accurately called the 2nd Chinese Civil War because China wanted to get rid of the direct Soviet political influence*) and it's to the point that the power of the internet is amplifying the harm of America's politics to their own voters.

And you know me. Both sides of my whole family still honor at least on the lip service-level the Russian Orthodox Church, so I really hate the USSR.... and America right now is the latest incarnation of the USSR.

I know you will have mixed feelings about what I wrote due to one side of my family being a Chinese provincial political dynasty, but this is the reality I experience every single day.

* Never forget that Communist China passionately hated the USSR and the Moscow-based post-Stalinist ideology on a national level. Today's China is the constitutional successor of the anti-communist Nationalist Government (1 July 1925 - 20 May 1948). Even though the Communist Party of China is Marxist and separately Leninist, the today's state constitution is still anti-communist. Even China's new civil code that was legally in power since 2022 (2 years ago) is more anti-communist than South Korea's civil code. The truth is that the whole phrase, Socialism with Chinese Characteristic (SWCC), relays the message "China in reality is not Marxist at all".
Apr 30, 8:05 AM

Offline
Dec 2016
6864
Lol. The status quo dude who gets run roughshod over by whomever the Whitehouse interns allow to have his ear. The based MIC or the cringe State Department. Or the dude who only has the My bodypillow guy and a few degrees of separation Kremlin propagandists for policy and MAGA for votes with him.
Apr 30, 3:21 PM

Offline
Mar 2008
49068
deg said:
are you gonna vote?

I wouldn't vote for normies.

Piromysl said:
Nowhere it mentions that little kids will be forced to work, which lying mainstream media wants you to belive. They do this disingenuous stuff literally all the time.

The regulation targeted by the Labor Department, which was first implemented by the Obama administration, prohibits 16- and 17-year-olds from independently operating power-driven patient lifts, which are commonly used in nursing homes and hospitals to move patients with mobility challenges.


You fell for the most common deception, which is only reading inflated headline, because they know perfectly well that vast majority of people will read only that and nothing else.
And believe it or not, Reich makes similar lies in other points he listed.

It is literally what the laws are called in the US. I dont really like referring to all minors as "children" but that's just how it is. Has nothing to do with politics. There is literally no lying there, they even went into detail exactly what that entailed. If there was an attempt at deception details of ages would be left out from the article itself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labor_laws_in_the_United_States

Also deg never said "force" he said "allow". Maybe you are confusing child labor laws with labor trafficking laws

I dont care about the age but do you unironically support people working hazardous equipment that can injure them or the patient with no training?

And by the way things like this do occur.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/feds-dhs-investigating-human-trafficking-children-slaughterhouses-rcna66081
Apr 30, 3:41 PM

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
Reply to traed
deg said:
are you gonna vote?

I wouldn't vote for normies.

Piromysl said:
Nowhere it mentions that little kids will be forced to work, which lying mainstream media wants you to belive. They do this disingenuous stuff literally all the time.

The regulation targeted by the Labor Department, which was first implemented by the Obama administration, prohibits 16- and 17-year-olds from independently operating power-driven patient lifts, which are commonly used in nursing homes and hospitals to move patients with mobility challenges.


You fell for the most common deception, which is only reading inflated headline, because they know perfectly well that vast majority of people will read only that and nothing else.
And believe it or not, Reich makes similar lies in other points he listed.

It is literally what the laws are called in the US. I dont really like referring to all minors as "children" but that's just how it is. Has nothing to do with politics. There is literally no lying there, they even went into detail exactly what that entailed. If there was an attempt at deception details of ages would be left out from the article itself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labor_laws_in_the_United_States

Also deg never said "force" he said "allow". Maybe you are confusing child labor laws with labor trafficking laws

I dont care about the age but do you unironically support people working hazardous equipment that can injure them or the patient with no training?

And by the way things like this do occur.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/feds-dhs-investigating-human-trafficking-children-slaughterhouses-rcna66081
@traed I don't really feel like explaining my point for like 5th time, because people still don't seem to get it, so...

Apr 30, 5:19 PM

Offline
Mar 2008
49068
Piromysl said:
I don't really feel like explaining my point for like 5th time, because people still don't seem to get it, so...

What you were calling a "mainstream news network" isnt even a news network it is a nonprofit group that has been around for 50 years focused on labor laws. Just answer the simple question. Do you or do you not support untrained while unsupervised employees using dangerous machinery? Yes or no
traedApr 30, 5:22 PM
Apr 30, 6:04 PM

Offline
Jul 2015
12111
Reply to traed
Piromysl said:
I don't really feel like explaining my point for like 5th time, because people still don't seem to get it, so...

What you were calling a "mainstream news network" isnt even a news network it is a nonprofit group that has been around for 50 years focused on labor laws. Just answer the simple question. Do you or do you not support untrained while unsupervised employees using dangerous machinery? Yes or no
I'm not gonna fall for your bad faith "gotcha" attempt, so don't even bother. Whether I support it or not is irrelevant to this discussion nor do I even have an idea that might think that I do.
And why the hell do you even link me an NPC News article, (which are open DNC shills) which is about something completely irrelevant? Are you somehow try to gaslight people into thinking that Orange Man will somehow contribute to child trafficking? Because throughout this whole thread those are the disingenuous lies I was talking about. The subject matter is one specific type of voluntary work in nursing homes for 16-17 year olds, yet you somehow bring up human trafficking of middle schoolers, who were employed illegally (I'm pretty sure them being employed illegally was a big factor why they were kidnapped and trafficked. No, they were still too young to work). I'm not sure why would you bring up something completely unrelated, but I think I have an idea, because that's literally what I'm arguing throughout this whole thread.
And about that article, quick look at author's Twitter account tell us she is a zionist. And her inflammatory language like "zealous" doesn't help her case either.

Apr 30, 6:43 PM
Offline
Dec 2022
3267
Even from a continental European standard, where states adopt the civil law system instead of the Anglo-Saxon common law system, America is indeed a failure due to many American-inspired reasons. To put it in a mundane way, one of the reasons happens to be putting so many overtly (I want to emphasize the word, overtly) dangerous people who support many neferious goals.
May 1, 5:46 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
in terms of economy democrats are better historically

U.S. economic performance by presidential party

Since World War II, the United States economy has performed significantly better on average under the administration of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents. The reasons for this are debated, and the observation applies to economic variables including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth and corporate profits. The unemployment rate has risen on average under Republican presidents, while it has fallen on average under Democratic presidents. Budget deficits relative to the size of the economy were lower on average for Democratic presidents.[1][2] Ten of the eleven U.S. recessions between 1953 and 2020 began under Republican presidents.[3]

Of these, the most statistically significant differences are in real GDP growth, unemployment rate change, stock market annual return, and job creation rate (see #Statistics).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._economic_performance_by_presidential_party
May 1, 10:47 AM

Offline
May 2013
7484
Reply to Pieromysl
MalchikRepaid said:
Piromysl said:
@deg You actually so believe that? And you actually posted a tweet form socialist grifter? For real?


More reason for Americans to support right wingers. TL;DR, American socialists hate everybody and themselves and it's becoming a huge problem.

Thank you for making sense in America's political reality as a person who lives 6 hours away from the US border by car.

There is a huge need to understand that as much as I hate Western Christianity, I have to admit that the human aspect of the American political system is based on that particular religious tradition. It takes courage to admit that American left wing people are evil people and their idea of left wing values doesn't apply soundly in Asia's Western democracies like in Japan or South Korea.

I mean, I someone who lives in post communistic country, seeing what happens in America is very harrowing. I may sound paranoid, but they already managed to convince people that "they are rich because you are poor", which is the fundamental grift that riles people up and eventually violent revolution commences, which is how communist tyrants always come to power. 1A and 2A seems to be the only thing that is stopping them.
@Piromysl

That is something of note I have seen in general which is the radicalization of the American left. Probably because they are the dominant social ideology here but it really has emboldened them to act out. It is also why I loathe Conservacucks so much.

"Atleast we follow the rules unlike them"

Fuck you, you can literally do nothing and they will label you as a terrorist and advocate for your removal you spineless losers.

Anyway, being non partisan is also an interesting position because I can get mad at both parties and not be wrapped up in their dogmatic baggage.



♡ Harder Daddy ♡
May 1, 6:14 PM
Offline
Dec 2022
3267
_Nette_ said:
That is something of note I have seen in general which is the radicalization of the American left. Probably because they are the dominant social ideology here but it really has emboldened them to act out. It is also why I loathe Conservacucks so much.


And this is also the reason I don't ever support the LGBT+ movement in the West, even though I'm a lesbian. I don't want to be a part of the political propaganda in countries with free elections.

Banning the LGBT+ movement like in China or Russia is the answer for my own sake.
May 1, 6:48 PM

Offline
May 2013
7484
Reply to MalchikRepaid
_Nette_ said:
That is something of note I have seen in general which is the radicalization of the American left. Probably because they are the dominant social ideology here but it really has emboldened them to act out. It is also why I loathe Conservacucks so much.


And this is also the reason I don't ever support the LGBT+ movement in the West, even though I'm a lesbian. I don't want to be a part of the political propaganda in countries with free elections.

Banning the LGBT+ movement like in China or Russia is the answer for my own sake.
@MalchikRepaid

Oh yeah it is hella cringe.

It all falls apart once you realize there isn't any person in politics who cares about anyone else. It's all performative to varying degrees. Best for me to just live my life.



♡ Harder Daddy ♡
May 3, 1:03 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
May 3, 3:28 AM

Offline
Oct 2015
5698
Come US, do not elect a dude facing 88 felony charges. Who said "find me this many votes" in Georgia after having tried to overturn the election results. Whose NATO hostility/threats to leave and Russia encouragement at the most critical of times risk plunging western geopolitical security into chaos. Who speaks of a bloodbath at the border. Whose insane 10% general tariffs on any imported good be it from the staunchest ally or not will lead to a trade deficit on the magnitude of tens of billions.

Sigh, this is just depressing that he has a higher than coin toss chance of winning. @traed also predictably not voting, stay classy.
May 3, 3:29 AM

Offline
Mar 2008
49068
Auron_ said:
Sigh, this is just depressing that he has a higher than coin toss chance of winning. @traed also predictably not voting, stay classy.

I never said that nor implied it. Obviously you dont the first thing about me.
traedMay 3, 3:33 AM
May 3, 3:34 AM

Offline
Oct 2015
5698
Reply to traed
Auron_ said:
Sigh, this is just depressing that he has a higher than coin toss chance of winning. @traed also predictably not voting, stay classy.

I never said that nor implied it. Obviously you dont the first thing about me.
@traed

I mean, you did say won't vote for normies, which I took it to mean Biden and Trump. So presumably it's gonna be a throwaway vote for Jill Stein or Cornell West or whatever, idk who's running. Which is not voting by my book.

Unless Biden isn't a normie, I don't know you tell me lol
May 3, 3:34 AM

Online
Oct 2022
1020
Reply to traed
Auron_ said:
Sigh, this is just depressing that he has a higher than coin toss chance of winning. @traed also predictably not voting, stay classy.

I never said that nor implied it. Obviously you dont the first thing about me.
@traed
traed said:
I wouldn't vote for normies.
-Login to mal
-Looks at notifications
-Three messages deleted
"Oh no"
May 3, 4:44 AM

Offline
Mar 2008
49068
Reply to Auron_
@traed

I mean, you did say won't vote for normies, which I took it to mean Biden and Trump. So presumably it's gonna be a throwaway vote for Jill Stein or Cornell West or whatever, idk who's running. Which is not voting by my book.

Unless Biden isn't a normie, I don't know you tell me lol
@Auron_
There is more to politics than voting for the "lesser of two evils" in an already broken voting system from a corrupt government.

Besides if you're worried about Trump him winning would defy too many new things at once to be of high probability. He hasnt even once won popular vote for starters and odds of getting electoral college without it is not very big as it has only happened three times. He is first US president to be impeached twice and first to face criminal charges but even just one impeachment or inquiry was enough to end every past president from winning again, though Andrew Johnson became a senator but that was long ago and he was only one still. Why 2020 was close as it was is due to Covid-19 at the time altering the usual voter turnout demographics. There also has only been one president in US history to win non consecutive terms, Grover Cleveland.

Also the senate is majority democrat right now. Youd more likely see a flip there than in the presidency. Even then various republican politicians are against Trump too.

The stress of his trial is likely shortening his lifespan and we all know he isnt so healthy as he claims with his obesity and chemical and grease filled diet as a senior citizen.
traedMay 3, 4:54 AM
May 3, 5:21 AM

Offline
Oct 2015
5698
Reply to traed
@Auron_
There is more to politics than voting for the "lesser of two evils" in an already broken voting system from a corrupt government.

Besides if you're worried about Trump him winning would defy too many new things at once to be of high probability. He hasnt even once won popular vote for starters and odds of getting electoral college without it is not very big as it has only happened three times. He is first US president to be impeached twice and first to face criminal charges but even just one impeachment or inquiry was enough to end every past president from winning again, though Andrew Johnson became a senator but that was long ago and he was only one still. Why 2020 was close as it was is due to Covid-19 at the time altering the usual voter turnout demographics. There also has only been one president in US history to win non consecutive terms, Grover Cleveland.

Also the senate is majority democrat right now. Youd more likely see a flip there than in the presidency. Even then various republican politicians are against Trump too.

The stress of his trial is likely shortening his lifespan and we all know he isnt so healthy as he claims with his obesity and chemical and grease filled diet as a senior citizen.
@traed

That there's more politics than voting for a president doesn't mean that this first thing about politics shouldn't be done, especially if the consequences are dire. Also literally every choice of president will be a lesser evil because you won't be 100% with them on everything. If you need to come back home and there's no bus stop that takes you directly to your doorstep, do you say "fuck it I'll walk" or do you take the one that takes you the closest to home?

I mean you can say all these and I would agree with you with regards to if it was any other president who have done these, but Trump has a cult. The truest thing he spoke was that he could shoot someone in 5th Avenue and not lose much support. Trump is still maintaining a lead on the polls, last I checked betting markets were also leaning slightly to Trump. All of the trials said it would not bar him from being president even if he was convicted, which are unlikely to conclude before the elections are over anyway. It's just not true that worries about his reelection are misplaced, there's a real danger here.

Even if he has lowered his lifespan with his diet, he has about the best medical care afforded to man. He's very unlikely to die before inauguration day, and afterwards it's a Republican in charge either way.
May 3, 6:13 AM

Offline
Mar 2008
49068
Reply to Auron_
@traed

That there's more politics than voting for a president doesn't mean that this first thing about politics shouldn't be done, especially if the consequences are dire. Also literally every choice of president will be a lesser evil because you won't be 100% with them on everything. If you need to come back home and there's no bus stop that takes you directly to your doorstep, do you say "fuck it I'll walk" or do you take the one that takes you the closest to home?

I mean you can say all these and I would agree with you with regards to if it was any other president who have done these, but Trump has a cult. The truest thing he spoke was that he could shoot someone in 5th Avenue and not lose much support. Trump is still maintaining a lead on the polls, last I checked betting markets were also leaning slightly to Trump. All of the trials said it would not bar him from being president even if he was convicted, which are unlikely to conclude before the elections are over anyway. It's just not true that worries about his reelection are misplaced, there's a real danger here.

Even if he has lowered his lifespan with his diet, he has about the best medical care afforded to man. He's very unlikely to die before inauguration day, and afterwards it's a Republican in charge either way.
@Auron_
It is just a different approach to voting. The goal is different than trying to make a specific person win that election. The two major parties have changed platforms various times before. They can do it again in response to previous election votes.

Polls like that tend to have a selection bias problem. People who dont like either wont reply. People without landlines wont get calls. People busy working wont have time to mail something off. Similar problem with betting sites only drawing certain kinds of people.

Also Allan Lichtman is saying Biden has better odds for now at least.
https://politicalpulse.net/us-politics/alan-lichtmans-prediction-for-2024/
May 3, 9:20 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
@traed

who is the lesser evil between trump and biden then?
May 3, 12:26 PM

Offline
Mar 2008
49068
Reply to deg
@traed

who is the lesser evil between trump and biden then?
@deg
That has become a painful question.
https://theconversation.com/whether-its-trump-or-biden-as-president-u-s-foreign-policy-endangers-the-world-225524

Domestically it could be Biden with what I know. What we dont know is the problem.
May 6, 11:03 AM

Offline
Aug 2022
2672
Republicans supporting Child Labor proves that they are the Red Party.
Marx believed that children should start working around the age of 9
Mao said:
If you have to shit, shit! If you have to fart, fart!
May 16, 6:15 PM

Offline
Jan 2009
100173
What to Know About CNN’s Presidential Debate

The debate, scheduled for June 27, will be one of the earliest presidential debates ever scheduled.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/16/us/politics/cnn-trump-biden-presidential-debate.html

may the worst dementia win
May 16, 9:30 PM

Offline
Mar 2008
49068
I wonder if boycotting the debate would do anything to future elections. I mean can always look it up elsewhere without ad revenue later anyway.
May 17, 7:39 AM
Offline
Jul 2021
3222
Trump 2024 FJB!!
Me every time I hear the word "reparations": 🤣🤣🤣
May 20, 9:31 AM

Offline
Aug 2022
2672
Reply to Dawizz
Trump 2024 FJB!!
@Dawizz Yeah I hope he gets the military to forcibly give you a vaccine at gunpoint when there's another outbreak...which he said he would.
Mao said:
If you have to shit, shit! If you have to fart, fart!
May 20, 11:48 PM
Offline
Dec 2022
3267
This debate doesn't matter as voters in general already made up their minds.

I ain't a Yankee Doodler, but I do wish Trump would win because I can't stand Biden and his cheap propaganda that agitates the LGBT movements around the world in the worst self-destructive ways possible.

So, yes.... Welcome, future president Donald J. Trump.
May 23, 4:16 AM
Offline
Dec 2022
3267
I have urinary incontinence ever since I was a teen, so I think of this as a positive thing.
May 23, 5:11 PM

Offline
Aug 2022
2672
I enjoy the fact that the choices are a guy who shits his diapers, a guy who can't remember what he ate this morning, and a guy who literally had worms eat his brains.

This is proof that G-d exists.
Mao said:
If you have to shit, shit! If you have to fart, fart!
Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members
Pages (5) [1] 2 3 » ... Last »

More topics from this board

» Live Updates: Russia Invades Ukraine From Land and Sea ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

deg - Feb 23, 2022

1973 by vasipi4946 »»
Yesterday, 1:39 PM

» "Slovak government mulls ban on mRNA vaccines"

Noboru - Oct 13

3 by Noboru »»
Oct 15, 10:07 AM

» Wildlife populations plunge 73% since 1970: WWF

deg - Oct 10

1 by traed »»
Oct 15, 6:18 AM

» Osama Bin Laden's son banned from re-entering France

Fate_Saber88 - Oct 8

5 by traed »»
Oct 15, 5:57 AM

» EU court rules social networks can’t use personal data forever

deg - Oct 5

1 by traed »»
Oct 9, 5:08 AM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login