MotRin said: DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime so therefore even if you don't watch it you know it's the exact same as DBZ and the big 3. Right?MotRin said: I did drop Kill la Kill right after finishing first episode (if you bother to check my list). I don't hold prejudice against any genre though. Sport anime is the same as any battle shounen with the only difference being lack of fantasy. Good then, I thought you made fun of me but actually you happened to be one of the few people who agree with me on that! I'm not alone, I'm relieved. Why not be friends? I think most people who will use the excuse of "Don't judge a book by its cover" are already doing so with sports anime. I know sports anime usually involves a team playing sports, playing sports, until the antagonist appears and surprise, he's an evil sportsman who will rule the world tyrannically.. With sports! This is your usual sports impression. Now by figuring out that an anime is a sports anime, this impression of sports anime comes into thought just by looking at the fact that an anime is of the sports genre. Now allow me to hate KLK as much as I want for being an overhyped DBZ battle clone with terrible fight scenes out of a 2 minutes scene I got recommended, just like how you hate sports anime without watching it. There is gangrape in Mirai Nikki. That's all the difference it needs. There was tentacle rape in Fairy Tail. @Andan210: I know. |
 |
DrGeroCreation said: Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime so therefore even if you don't watch it you know it's the exact same as DBZ and the big 3. Right? Who said Mirai Nikki was a battle shonen alike the big/overrated three (minus DBK)? Also, why bring up Mirai Nikki again?! |
 |
Lord_Pooka said: To make a point to show you that you can't just generalize like that.DrGeroCreation said: Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime so therefore even if you don't watch it you know it's the exact same as DBZ and the big 3. Right? Who said Mirai Nikki was a battle shonen alike the big/overrated three (minus DBK)? Also, why bring up Mirai Nikki again?! |
 |
DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: To make a point to show you that you can't just generalize like that.DrGeroCreation said: Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime so therefore even if you don't watch it you know it's the exact same as DBZ and the big 3. Right? Who said Mirai Nikki was a battle shonen alike the big/overrated three (minus DBK)? Also, why bring up Mirai Nikki again?! Oh, you're not joking. Looking at the image and the description, you'll find no hints of DBZ-like battles. And the final result is that you've got only one DBZ-like battle, but it comes at the end. Battle anime with totally unrealistic battles stand out very damn well. |
|
galimx said: Mirai Nikki is a generic shounen. Actually, it's far less. Fixed. |
| "Let Justice Be Done!" My Theme Fight again, fight again for justice! |
MotRin said: SolBlade said: MotRin said: That's why it's better than the big 3. Rape makes everything better. It's not actual rape in FT so it's still worse than Mirai Nikki. Krauser raped the Tokyo Tower in Detroit Metal City (along with a bunch of other things). Therefore DMC>Mirai Nikki>Fairy Tail. |
|
| I used to be nice, explaining that it wasn't right, it was stupid, and convincing the user to continue watching. Now that I realize doing something like that is a waste of my time, I just don't take their post seriously, ever. I mean, they must be pretty stubborn; if they won't even try to understand the series, probably they won't try to understand my post either. |
| I don't have a problem with it. Embrace your prejudices I say, they are usually correct. |
 |
Lord_Pooka said: That's the point just because Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime doesn't mean it's the exact same as DBZ.DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: To make a point to show you that you can't just generalize like that.DrGeroCreation said: Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime so therefore even if you don't watch it you know it's the exact same as DBZ and the big 3. Right? Who said Mirai Nikki was a battle shonen alike the big/overrated three (minus DBK)? Also, why bring up Mirai Nikki again?! Oh, you're not joking. Looking at the image and the description, you'll find no hints of DBZ-like battles. And the final result is that you've got only one DBZ-like battle, but it comes at the end. Battle anime with totally unrealistic battles stand out very damn well. |
|
DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: That's the point just because Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime doesn't mean it's the exact same as DBZ.DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: To make a point to show you that you can't just generalize like that.DrGeroCreation said: Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime so therefore even if you don't watch it you know it's the exact same as DBZ and the big 3. Right? Who said Mirai Nikki was a battle shonen alike the big/overrated three (minus DBK)? Also, why bring up Mirai Nikki again?! Oh, you're not joking. Looking at the image and the description, you'll find no hints of DBZ-like battles. And the final result is that you've got only one DBZ-like battle, but it comes at the end. Battle anime with totally unrealistic battles stand out very damn well. Who told you that Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen in the first place? |
|
| My circles are all in place. Soon, the arguments will never end. Muahahahahhaa. |
|
Ckan said: My circles are all in place. Soon, the arguments will never end. Muahahahahhaa. You planned this all along? Well played, sir. |
|
Ckan said: You will soon complete the large transmutation circle around the forum by using the arguments started in each board. Well playedMy circles are all in place. Soon, the arguments will never end. Muahahahahhaa. |
     Short of the day: Monotonous Purgatory(MAL) ✰Public Domain Club | One Piece Club✰ |
DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: It is factually a battle shonen anime because it was published in a shonen magazine and action is one of it's main genres.DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: That's the point just because Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime doesn't mean it's the exact same as DBZ.DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: To make a point to show you that you can't just generalize like that.DrGeroCreation said: Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime so therefore even if you don't watch it you know it's the exact same as DBZ and the big 3. Right? Who said Mirai Nikki was a battle shonen alike the big/overrated three (minus DBK)? Also, why bring up Mirai Nikki again?! Oh, you're not joking. Looking at the image and the description, you'll find no hints of DBZ-like battles. And the final result is that you've got only one DBZ-like battle, but it comes at the end. Battle anime with totally unrealistic battles stand out very damn well. Who told you that Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen in the first place? Yeah, just because the publication is inside a shonen magazine and it being based on action, this means its damn safe to plaster the word "battle" on it out of nowhere, huh? So even if it lacks battles but instead shootings and escape from death situations in which you can win it by strategic planning and brains instead of body strength and whatever magical force inside you, Mirai Nikki is indeed factually an animanga in which Yuno punches everyone mindlessly to death while her enemies use their superpowers such as flight, rather than both sides thinking about how to strike carefully or else they're dead, huh? And when all the fights involve the use of weapons that aren't super powered or anything, real weapons, bar one fight, right? I give no damn to the publication source. Whether its a battle shonen or not sticks out from the description. |
|
Ckan said: You are such a deviant tactician.My circles are all in place. Soon, the arguments will never end. Muahahahahhaa. [@Lord_Pooka |
DrGeroCreationApr 15, 2014 11:29 AM
|
Ckan said: My circles are all in place. Soon, the arguments will never end. Muahahahahhaa. *Activates Face* Your magic is meaningless. |
Lord_Pooka said: DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: It is factually a battle shonen anime because it was published in a shonen magazine and action is one of it's main genres.DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: That's the point just because Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime doesn't mean it's the exact same as DBZ.DrGeroCreation said: Lord_Pooka said: To make a point to show you that you can't just generalize like that.DrGeroCreation said: Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen anime so therefore even if you don't watch it you know it's the exact same as DBZ and the big 3. Right? Who said Mirai Nikki was a battle shonen alike the big/overrated three (minus DBK)? Also, why bring up Mirai Nikki again?! Oh, you're not joking. Looking at the image and the description, you'll find no hints of DBZ-like battles. And the final result is that you've got only one DBZ-like battle, but it comes at the end. Battle anime with totally unrealistic battles stand out very damn well. Who told you that Mirai Nikki is a battle shonen in the first place? Yeah, just because the publication is inside a shonen magazine and it being based on action, this means its damn safe to plaster the word "battle" on it out of nowhere, huh? So even if it lacks battles but instead shootings and escape from death situations in which you can win it by strategic planning and brains instead of body strength and whatever magical force inside you, Mirai Nikki is indeed factually an animanga in which Yuno punches everyone mindlessly to death while her enemies use their superpowers such as flight, rather than both sides thinking about how to strike carefully or else they're dead, huh? And when all the fights involve the use of weapons that aren't super powered or anything, real weapons, bar one fight, right? I give no damn to the publication source. Whether its a battle shonen or not sticks out from the description. It can still be said to be one, just not the kind that you're describing (which is the most popular definition). |
|
| i do it jokingly with friends, he has been trying to get me to watch TTGL for month and months and just constantly tell him its garbage (ive seen 6/7 eps i think) and tbh its not that bad just a little OTT for me...... but i don't think you can seriously bash a series you haven't given a chance and be expected to be taken seriously! |
Lord_Pooka said: Yeah, just because the publication is inside a shonen magazine and it being based on action, this means its damn safe to plaster the word "battle" on it out of nowhere, huh? So even if it lacks battles but instead shootings and escape from death situations in which you can win it by strategic planning and brains instead of body strength and whatever magical force inside you, Mirai Nikki is indeed factually an animanga in which Yuno punches everyone mindlessly to death while her enemies use their superpowers such as flight, rather than both sides thinking about how to strike carefully or else they're dead, huh? And when all the fights involve the use of weapons that aren't super powered or anything, real weapons, bar one fight, right? I give no damn to the publication source. Whether its a battle shonen or not sticks out from the description. They fight using cellphones that can tell the future... that's realistic (I'm arguing with my first friend on MAL T^T) |
SolBlade said: It can still be said to be one, just not the kind that you're describing (which is the most popular definition). By that logic, TV shows revolving around gangsters attacking other gangsters would be battle TV shows. There's a big difference between battle and action. DBZ is both but a mafia show (or Mirai Nikki bar that only battle) is action only. This conservation is pity though. A battle shonen anime sticks out very damn well. If its battle just because uh its shonen and action even though "battles" are non-existent, then its not battle. Its just "action". Now where was I, before DrGero summoned Mirai Nikki for no apparent reason? They fight using cellphones that can tell the future... that's realistic (I'm arguing with my first friend on MAL T^T) Well the future diaries are probably the only unrealistic weapons, and they're more of methods of survival than a killing tool (unless you destroy another's diary). |
|
Lord_Pooka said: Battle is a synonym for action http://thesaurus.com/browse/battleSolBlade said: It can still be said to be one, just not the kind that you're describing (which is the most popular definition). By that logic, TV shows revolving around gangsters attacking other gangsters would be battle TV shows. There's a big difference between battle and action. DBZ is both but a mafia show (or Mirai Nikki bar that only battle) is action only. This conservation is pity though. A battle shonen anime sticks out very damn well. If its battle just because uh its shonen and action even though "battles" are non-existent, then its not battle. Its just "action". Now where was I, before DrGero summoned Mirai Nikki for no apparent reason? They fight using cellphones that can tell the future... that's realistic (I'm arguing with my first friend on MAL T^T) Well the future diaries are probably the only unrealistic weapons, and they're more of methods of survival than a killing tool (unless you destroy another's diary). |
|
Lord_Pooka said: SolBlade said: It can still be said to be one, just not the kind that you're describing (which is the most popular definition). By that logic, TV shows revolving around gangsters attacking other gangsters would be battle TV shows. There's a big difference between battle and action. DBZ is both but a mafia show (or Mirai Nikki bar that only battle) is action only. This conservation is pity though. A battle shonen anime sticks out very damn well. If its battle just because uh its shonen and action even though "battles" are non-existent, then its not battle. Its just "action". Now where was I, before DrGero summoned Mirai Nikki for no apparent reason? I know. All I'm saying is that it could be considered one. I don't even consider Mirai Nikki one myself (more like supernatural shounen), though it does share a few elements with them. Heck, I wasn't even being entirely serious there. But the point I'm trying to make is that battle shounen is practically just another word for action shounen. |
|
DrGeroCreation said: That's like saying H20 is a synonym for water. Sure, they're the same thing, but they do have a variety of different meanings and connotations.Battle is a synonym for action http://thesaurus.com/browse/battle Nevertheless, you may carry on so long as you do not disturb my circles! |
| I have a term for them: "Crystal Ball Critics." And I trust them just as much as your average fortuneteller. Term also applies to people who try to be authoritative after seeing some laughably small percentage like 1/26 episodes or 10 minutes of 1 episode. |
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Everything that connects to MAL |
Zalis said: But it brings up an interesting question. How big a percentage is 'enough'?I have a term for them: "Crystal Ball Critics." And I trust them just as much as your average fortuneteller. Term also applies to people who try to be authoritative after seeing some laughably small percentage like 1/26 episodes or 10 minutes of 1 episode. If we say that it depends on the series, that doesn't that mean that some shows could require only an episode, or less, of a viewing? |
| It's pretty annoying, if you dont want to watch something then fair enough. But if you sit and complain about something you havent at least tried to watch then it's annoying. It's like saying "oh i hate that band" having never heard their music, but only reading what keys they play in or something >.> |
| Does anyone else need a doctor to confirm that someone without a head is dead? |
Ckan said: True but in the case of anime they are synonyms.DrGeroCreation said: That's like saying H20 is a synonym for water. Sure, they're the same thing, but they do have a variety of different meanings and connotations.Battle is a synonym for action http://thesaurus.com/browse/battle Nevertheless, you may carry on so long as you do not disturb my circles! |
|
Ckan said: Zalis said: But it brings up an interesting question. How big a percentage is 'enough'?I have a term for them: "Crystal Ball Critics." And I trust them just as much as your average fortuneteller. Term also applies to people who try to be authoritative after seeing some laughably small percentage like 1/26 episodes or 10 minutes of 1 episode. If we say that it depends on the series, that doesn't that mean that some shows could require only an episode, or less, of a viewing? There is another question. How many episodes of One Piece does one need to watch before s/he can have a critical opinion of OP that can be accepted by the likes of you? How big is that percentage when it comes to something super long like One Piece? 6 out of 640 (is that the number now?) would be a laughibly small percentage of episodes, you know. And nobody's going to stay until the 30th episode in order to tell people that OP is bad if it proves itself as so by the 6th episode. |
|
Lord_Pooka said: Ckan said: Zalis said: But it brings up an interesting question. How big a percentage is 'enough'?I have a term for them: "Crystal Ball Critics." And I trust them just as much as your average fortuneteller. Term also applies to people who try to be authoritative after seeing some laughably small percentage like 1/26 episodes or 10 minutes of 1 episode. If we say that it depends on the series, that doesn't that mean that some shows could require only an episode, or less, of a viewing? There is another question. How many episodes of One Piece does one need to watch before s/he can have a critical opinion of OP that can be accepted by the likes of you? How big is that percentage when it comes to something super long like One Piece? 6 out of 640 (is that the number now?) would be a laughibly small percentage of episodes, you know. And none is going to stay until the 30th episode in order to tell people that OP is bad if it proves itself as so by the 6th episode. Or you know, maybe they could just shut up about something he hasn't/ has barely watched. |
 |
Lord_Pooka said: Ckan said: Zalis said: But it brings up an interesting question. How big a percentage is 'enough'?I have a term for them: "Crystal Ball Critics." And I trust them just as much as your average fortuneteller. Term also applies to people who try to be authoritative after seeing some laughably small percentage like 1/26 episodes or 10 minutes of 1 episode. If we say that it depends on the series, that doesn't that mean that some shows could require only an episode, or less, of a viewing? There is another question. How many episodes of One Piece does one need to watch before s/he can have a critical opinion of OP that can be accepted by the likes of you? How big is that percentage when it comes to something super long like One Piece? 6 out of 640 (is that the number now?) would be a laughibly small percentage of episodes, you know. And none is going to stay until the 30th episode in order to tell people that OP is bad if it proves itself as so by the 6th episode. It depends. As long as your judgments are based solely on what you've seen as you can't really tell what's to come if you haven't seen the rest of it. For OP, I'd say 5-10% of the current length is good enough for a first impression as most of the main cast isn't introduced until episode 30 or so (this also applies to a lot of other long runners as they tend to start slower than normal). And yes, it's 640 right now. |
|
yhunata said: Lord_Pooka said: Ckan said: Zalis said: But it brings up an interesting question. How big a percentage is 'enough'?I have a term for them: "Crystal Ball Critics." And I trust them just as much as your average fortuneteller. Term also applies to people who try to be authoritative after seeing some laughably small percentage like 1/26 episodes or 10 minutes of 1 episode. If we say that it depends on the series, that doesn't that mean that some shows could require only an episode, or less, of a viewing? There is another question. How many episodes of One Piece does one need to watch before s/he can have a critical opinion of OP that can be accepted by the likes of you? How big is that percentage when it comes to something super long like One Piece? 6 out of 640 (is that the number now?) would be a laughibly small percentage of episodes, you know. And none is going to stay until the 30th episode in order to tell people that OP is bad if it proves itself as so by the 6th episode. Or you know, maybe they could just shut up about something he hasn't/ has barely watched. Leave them do at will. Nobody's going to shut up just because you said "you barely watched it." We should be open to opinions regardless of how much one saw an anime, and agree and disagree on the criticism than booting the guy off just because "you barely watched it!" That's democracy. It depends. As long as your judgments are based solely on what you've seen as you can't really tell what's to come if you haven't seen the rest of it. For OP, I'd say 5-10% of the current length is good enough for a first impression as most of the main cast isn't introduced until episode 30 or so (this also applies to a lot of other long runners as they tend to start slower than normal). And yes, it's 640 right now. Wow, time got past quick. I remember when I talked about 631 episodes not long ago. But if One Piece got bad by the 6th episode for a person, nobody's going to stay until the 30th just in order to have their opinion accepted. 30 episodes is longer than your short 26 episodes anime. 30 in order to have otakus take you seriously is still too much. That's why I don't bind myself to how much I watched it before I complain. If its bad, then I'll say it is so. How long I watched that bad thing be damned. |
Tsun_PookaApr 15, 2014 12:07 PM
|
SolBlade said: It depends. As long as your judgments are based solely on what you've seen as you can't really tell what's to come if you haven't seen the rest of it. For OP, I'd say 5-10% of the current length is good enough for a first impression as most of the main cast isn't introduced until episode 30 or so. And yes, it's 640 right now. Enduring 64 episodes when you can't stand the character designs/narration style/etc from the first episode would be a torture. |
Lord_Pooka said: yhunata said: Lord_Pooka said: Ckan said: Zalis said: But it brings up an interesting question. How big a percentage is 'enough'?I have a term for them: "Crystal Ball Critics." And I trust them just as much as your average fortuneteller. Term also applies to people who try to be authoritative after seeing some laughably small percentage like 1/26 episodes or 10 minutes of 1 episode. If we say that it depends on the series, that doesn't that mean that some shows could require only an episode, or less, of a viewing? There is another question. How many episodes of One Piece does one need to watch before s/he can have a critical opinion of OP that can be accepted by the likes of you? How big is that percentage when it comes to something super long like One Piece? 6 out of 640 (is that the number now?) would be a laughibly small percentage of episodes, you know. And none is going to stay until the 30th episode in order to tell people that OP is bad if it proves itself as so by the 6th episode. Or you know, maybe they could just shut up about something he hasn't/ has barely watched. Leave them do at will. Nobody's going to shut up just because you said "you barely watched it." We should be open to opinions regardless of how much one saw an anime, and agree and disagree on the criticism than booting the guy off just because "you barely watched it!" That's democracy. There's just one thing. Hate all they want, they better know what the fuck they're talking about..... which they won't, if they haven't watched said series. |
|
MotRin said: SolBlade said: It depends. As long as your judgments are based solely on what you've seen as you can't really tell what's to come if you haven't seen the rest of it. For OP, I'd say 5-10% of the current length is good enough for a first impression as most of the main cast isn't introduced until episode 30 or so. And yes, it's 640 right now. Enduring 64 episodes when you can't stand the character designs/narration style/etc from the first episode would be a torture. I did say give or take 2%, so at least 20-30 is fine. It's a long-runner so it's to be expected. The character designs become increasingly bizarre over time so I can understand why someone wouldn't be too fond of them if they didn't like it initially. Kinda like why I can't get people to watch Kaiji. |
|
SolBlade said: MotRin said: SolBlade said: It depends. As long as your judgments are based solely on what you've seen as you can't really tell what's to come if you haven't seen the rest of it. For OP, I'd say 5-10% of the current length is good enough for a first impression as most of the main cast isn't introduced until episode 30 or so. And yes, it's 640 right now. Enduring 64 episodes when you can't stand the character designs/narration style/etc from the first episode would be a torture. I did say give or take 2%, so at least 20-30 is fine. It's a long-runner so it's to be expected. The character designs become increasingly bizarre over time so I can understand why someone wouldn't be too fond of them if they didn't like it initially. Kinda like why I can't get people to watch Kaiji. Dem noses. |
|
| A show I've never seen? Nah I wouldn't waste my time and energy complaining. I would just forget about it and move on to something I want to see. Seeing other people complain about shows they've never seen? Lol, I don't give a fuck if they want to be that closed-minded. |
This topic has not been locked and is still available for discussion. |
yhunata said: SolBlade said: MotRin said: SolBlade said: It depends. As long as your judgments are based solely on what you've seen as you can't really tell what's to come if you haven't seen the rest of it. For OP, I'd say 5-10% of the current length is good enough for a first impression as most of the main cast isn't introduced until episode 30 or so. And yes, it's 640 right now. Enduring 64 episodes when you can't stand the character designs/narration style/etc from the first episode would be a torture. I did say give or take 2%, so at least 20-30 is fine. It's a long-runner so it's to be expected. The character designs become increasingly bizarre over time so I can understand why someone wouldn't be too fond of them if they didn't like it initially. Kinda like why I can't get people to watch Kaiji. Dem noses. Don't forget about the manly tears. |
|
SolBlade said: yhunata said: SolBlade said: MotRin said: SolBlade said: It depends. As long as your judgments are based solely on what you've seen as you can't really tell what's to come if you haven't seen the rest of it. For OP, I'd say 5-10% of the current length is good enough for a first impression as most of the main cast isn't introduced until episode 30 or so. And yes, it's 640 right now. Enduring 64 episodes when you can't stand the character designs/narration style/etc from the first episode would be a torture. I did say give or take 2%, so at least 20-30 is fine. It's a long-runner so it's to be expected. The character designs become increasingly bizarre over time so I can understand why someone wouldn't be too fond of them if they didn't like it initially. Kinda like why I can't get people to watch Kaiji. Dem noses. Don't forget about the manly tears. I should get around watching Kaiji once my exams are over. Seems my type of anime, if I can get over the artstyle. |
|
MotRin said: Enduring 64 episodes when you can't stand the character designs/narration style/etc from the first episode would be a torture. Yes. As my edit above points out, its not worthy to torture yourself just to have your opinion approved by anime fans. Complain all you want by watching however long you want. yhunata said: There's just one thing. Hate all they want, they better know what the fuck they're talking about..... which they won't, if they haven't watched said series. Just leave them speak as much as they want out of whatever total of episodes they watched. Nobody's obligated to shut them up and silence their freedom of saying something sucks while not watching a single episode. |
|
Lord_Pooka said: yhunata said: There's just one thing. Hate all they want, they better know what the fuck they're talking about..... which they won't, if they haven't watched said series. Just leave them speak as much as they want out of whatever total of episodes they watched. Nobody's obligated to shut them up and silence their freedom of saying something sucks while not watching a single episode. Yeah, I usually ignore them. Sometimes, I do feel like taking the bait, though. |
|
yhunata said: SolBlade said: yhunata said: SolBlade said: MotRin said: SolBlade said: It depends. As long as your judgments are based solely on what you've seen as you can't really tell what's to come if you haven't seen the rest of it. For OP, I'd say 5-10% of the current length is good enough for a first impression as most of the main cast isn't introduced until episode 30 or so. And yes, it's 640 right now. Enduring 64 episodes when you can't stand the character designs/narration style/etc from the first episode would be a torture. I did say give or take 2%, so at least 20-30 is fine. It's a long-runner so it's to be expected. The character designs become increasingly bizarre over time so I can understand why someone wouldn't be too fond of them if they didn't like it initially. Kinda like why I can't get people to watch Kaiji. Dem noses. Don't forget about the manly tears. I should get around watching Kaiji once my exams are over. Seems my type of anime, if I can get over the artstyle. It's definitely worth it if you can get past the art style. If you're a fan of psychological anime then you'll most likely enjoy this one as it's mainly centered around gambling. And the main character is the true definition of moe. |
|
yhunata said: Yeah, I usually ignore them. Sometimes, I do feel like taking the bait, though. I like it when people take my bait and get butthurt. |
Lord_Pooka said: yhunata said: There's just one thing. Hate all they want, they better know what the fuck they're talking about..... which they won't, if they haven't watched said series. Just leave them speak as much as they want out of whatever total of episodes they watched. Nobody's obligated to shut them up and silence their freedom of saying something sucks while not watching a single episode. But nobody prevents them from talking, but they shouldn't be surprised if people tell them that their opinion is uninformed. |
MotRin said: yhunata said: Yeah, I usually ignore them. Sometimes, I do feel like taking the bait, though. I like it when people take my bait and get butthurt. You must be a master baiter. |
|
More topics from this board
» Why Trap Characters are goodGoatPieceLuffy - 21 minutes ago |
3 |
by Kenzolo-folk
»»
6 minutes ago |
|
» Are there any anime that you think should have ended sooner?Anjuro - Yesterday |
23 |
by Kenzolo-folk
»»
10 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » How much do you love your favorite character?Shizuna - 2 hours ago |
8 |
by WaffleMaster89
»»
25 minutes ago |
|
» The decline of MananimeJoeChip - 9 hours ago |
32 |
by NotActuallyReal
»»
29 minutes ago |
|
» Are there any characters which you wanted to see more but were killed early, forgotten or the anime itself was too short?Shizuna - Yesterday |
26 |
by 8oomer
»»
29 minutes ago |