Report thejanjo92's Profile

Statistics

All Anime Stats Anime Stats
Days: 8.5
Mean Score: 8.45
  • Total Entries37
  • Rewatched0
  • Episodes517
Anime History Last Anime Updates
Sousei no Onmyouji
Sousei no Onmyouji
Mar 14, 2017 10:48 AM
Watching 47/50 · Scored 6
Hai to Gensou no Grimgar
Hai to Gensou no Grimgar
Mar 3, 2017 5:37 AM
Completed 12/12 · Scored 9
Maoyuu Maou Yuusha
Maoyuu Maou Yuusha
Mar 3, 2017 5:37 AM
Completed 12/12 · Scored 9
All Manga Stats Manga Stats
Days: 0.0
Mean Score: 0.00
  • Total Entries0
  • Reread0
  • Chapters0
  • Volumes0
Manga History Last Manga Updates

No updates yet.

All Favorites Favorites

Anime (7)
Manga (5)
Character (10)

All Comments (18) Comments

Would you like to post a comment? Please login or sign up first!
Ankins Oct 16, 2017 1:07 PM
I love your profile and how you completely explained what type of anime fan you are and what you think of anime. I can relate to a lot of what you said in that description. Kudos
tyroan Mar 27, 2016 1:21 PM
Good taste in music and I love your favorite character and profile pic :)
Snowtear Mar 27, 2016 7:28 AM
Hello! Wanna take a look at my first review? Could use some feedback or advice, thank You!
Link: http://myanimelist.net/reviews.php?id=214326
Captain220 Mar 26, 2016 2:11 PM
Exactly. I think some people aren't satisfied because they went in with the assumption that it's gonna be Berserk v2. I actually quite like the time skip, the character development is better than before I'd say. Do miss Askeladd though :(

I haven't read the manga either but apparently A-1 went with an anime-original ending. And you know, since it's A-1 it ended up being shit.
Captain220 Mar 26, 2016 11:01 AM
"finished the way it had to", No. A-1 completely butchered the final third, that was definitely not how it had to end. Though I understand how people can think of Erased as good if they don't critically evaluate shows and watch simply for enjoyment, but it has too many flaws for me to consider it good. Thanks.

It really is. Kinda sad to see a lot of people not enjoying it as much after the time skip :/
literaturenerd Mar 25, 2016 7:25 PM
I enjoyed G gundam. It's very cheesy and silly, but its hilarious. That's why I gave it a pretty generous rating.
ZephSilver Jan 3, 2016 10:12 PM
Happy new years to you too (well I'm sure late)
You know you could of just watch my list and saw that I already saw it right? but yea Tex is cool, nihilism personified.
ZephSilver Dec 30, 2015 6:38 PM
Gracias.
I think Gangsta is more comparable to Gungrave and Black Lagoon but not so much Jormungand.
Vehemor Dec 28, 2015 6:41 AM
That's why reviews are subjective, maybe in six months you'll rewatch TG35 and won't like it, maybe in six months I will.

DB and DBZ are classics with simple stories, characters are likeable and BGMs are way better than TG35's. If you watch DB expecting some really meaningfull plot you're done, you must know what you're about to watch.

Have a great 2016.
ZephSilver Dec 26, 2015 7:57 PM
And you don't believe a anime that so happen to be adapted from another source isn't it's own work? You see that's the problem I'm having, you're only using your logic when it suites you but if you're going to use it use it all the way. Don't just say it's ok for this but not that because "reasons", if I'm using your idea of what should be judged then anything with a written script should be it's own work. A anime adaptation has a different written script that just so happen to follow that of a written material, so same way the manga is a re-written script of the novel (which was also a rough draft). I think you're missing that point. There are three different re-tellings of a story, in this case Arslan Senki; the novel, the manga and the anime. Whether you prefer one re-telling to another has nothing to do with the others, and since it's done in it's own medium under it's own script it should be evaluated for that. At the end of the day you're saying the written medium only counts not because you think it does but because they just so happen to share the same name. If the Lion King was named Hamlet instead would that change the story of lions to only be judged from it's source which was Shakespeare's play? Well no, and that's the same thing with Arlsan. If Arlsan's anime was named "The Adventures of the White haired Prince" I'm sure you wouldn't have said what you did regarding it's source material being the only viable thing to judge.
I say all that to say this: anything that takes on a different medium and has it's own written script (whether that script be based on a previous work or not) should be evaluated on it's own merits. It's not complicated, it's a simple unspoken rule.

"If anything a 7 should be a good score for it. Since the animation, and sound where pretty well implemented, the fights where good, and the application of tactics was applied at the right level that they are actually applied in real life."
your lack of experience with proper critiquing is causing you to put your foot in your mouth. Good animation? Arslan's animation was some of the worse implemented in it's respective season and in the year altogether. The only anime that I've seen that tops it for worse production was Denpa Kyoushi and Gunslinger Stratos. It had choppy motion mechanics for the character movements, inconsistent character models that were always distorted when presented at a uncommon angle and jarring usage of CGI models used in place of actual craftsmanship.
The tactics were far removed from reality, a horse jumping 20feet into the air onto a rampaging elephant to kidnap a prince is in no way realistic or even plausible. Their ability to take down an army of thousands with less than a dozen characters in the 1st half before retaining a army is absolutely ludicrous, especially since that army was shown to topple an empire overnight. Let's not use words like "realistic" to describe these battles. There is no documented event where an inferior handful of men was able to outmaneuver a army of thousands by simply using the name recognition of one feared man. This story is a gross over-exaggerated romanticizing of war stories told in the middle ages. If you want to see actual tactics where both sides have losses and victories based off of ACTUAL military tactics used throughout history go watch Legend of the Galactic Heroes.
"Also the characters are pretty unique, and most evolve over time. "
you thought these cardboard cutout archetypes were "unique"? These characters are so by the book you can practically sum them up with 1-liners. I think the biggest difference I'm spotting here isn't misguided information between us but rather a case where it's a difference in experience. Where you see this as "good" I see this as a average medieval war drama done a million times over (average = 5). If you've only had a hotdog a few times in your life then I'm sure the taste is still good to you but if you've consumed a hotdog a hundred times over you get to the point where it's just "alright". And that's the problem, I've seen Arslan before, in book, movies, tv shows and other anime. Arslan does nothing new, Arlsan doesn't take risks and even if it was going by the books, which isn't always a bad thing, it's executed so poorly with bad audiovisuals and terrible leaps in logic tossed in to keep the plot going. It's a average story told in a average way. Unique to you maybe, but far from the case with someone who's already passed that threshold of rose colored lens.
And a 5 isn't a bad score, I'm using the MAL rating as it was intended. There's words in brackets giving an example of each for a reason. I think you're confusing personal enjoyment of a title with actual evaluation of it. Enjoyment is only one aspect of everything you need to consider.
"i just dont watch them nor write the review, since i personally dont see the need to write a bad review"
Thank God you don't review then. A reviewer is there to inform the audience not to simply review what they think is good. A reviewer is suppose to be well rounded and impartial and not simply call something that's average good because they personally enjoy it. If the idea of writing a review for a show that isn't up to snuff bad for you then what exactly is the point? If Pupa is shit and but no one reviews it how is a audience unaware suppose to find out before hand? If a show is overhyped but no one gives a more balanced review how are they going to feel when all the reviews are "10/10" but the show was just "alright" to them.
"And i believe people should exercise their own judgement upon anime, and watch them at their own perril, and decide for themselves if its worth their time"
and this is something I can actually agree upon with you. But some people like an outside opinion as well to either inform what they thought after watching or to simply get an idea of what to expect before they watch it. That's what reviews are there for. Reviews are suppose to give the highlights and downsides to a product. And if that's the case I won't sell a viewer a faulty product if I myself knows better. And if a product is good I will be more than happy to share that with them. But like you said it's up to them to decide, my review simply serves as a precursor to that decision.
Merry Xmas and Happy new year to you too, nice chatting with you.
ZephSilver Dec 23, 2015 6:47 PM
Well I think everything that take on a different medium IS it's own work and should be judged as such. If a anime is half assed and rushed but "better" in the manga then that has nothing to do with the anime. As a anime and under the guidelines of evaluation given for the anime that anime failed. Whether another medium that exists did the same story better or worse should have no involvement with the critiquing of another medium. Unless the story is a sequel/prequel or a tie in to another medium or continuation from the same medium it should be given it's fair shot as a title. This idea of series being judged on it's "original" work is so outlandishly absurd that the moment you think about what that implies is the moment it doesn't make sense. Since with that logic, The Lion King should not be judged since it was originally based on Shakespeare's Hamlet. And this applies to thousands of so called "original" works, like the anime and novel From the New World which is based off of 1932's novel Brave New World or the seminal sci-fi juggernauts like Blade Runner which is based off of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. My point is, your idea of judging on the original work is a fallacy since every adaptation or idea is based off something else. So FMA 03 shouldn't be judged based on the manga since the anime clearly crafted it's own story while the manga wasn't even finished.
So no the idea of judging Arslan based on the merit of two separate mediums (manga and novels) is stupid since those are entirely different reiterations done in a completely different medium. Your idea of judging is misguided and I'm trying no to sound like a ass but it's very foolish.
And I'm not offended, just wish you would examine before you comment. I mean a quick read through or even a quick glance of scores would show that what you stated wasn't grounded in any kind of truth. And I hope my ramblings aren't just disregarded as I genuinely would like you to consider the broader ramification of simply judging shows by your definition of "original" works. I think you need to understand what form of judgement would work for one medium shouldn't apply for another and the same should also be considered when discussioning the merits of a story told in different mediums. IF you want to make something comparing the story of the manga as appose to the anime then so be it BUT in a review of Arlsan Senki the anime there is only one source that takes precedence. It's a anime review, not a manga review, not a novel review but a anime review. Thanks for your time.
ZephSilver Dec 21, 2015 5:14 PM
Aren't you the same person who commented trying to defend Aldnoah Zero before deleting your comments and running back behind your fake MAL account? lol if not ignore this sentence but if so find someone else to waste your time on because I'm in no mood to put up with someone who need to delete their messages after they make their statements.

I'm too lazy to bother explaining my reviewing process so I'll just copy what I have in my bio:
"There's no formulaic system to my reviews as I feel like a set criteria/guideline is too limited and doesn't account for variables; rather my reviews take into account what the show places emphasis on and how it is presented, executed and explored. Plot inconsistencies, poorly realized themes and other issues are all accounted for. Obviously the more these issues are apparent the more it distracts from the overall evaluation. If a show have a lot more strengths than weaknesses then that is also taken into consideration"

So with that info out of the way Jojo got a good score for being a good romanticizing of GAR done in a very self-aware fashion. it's a show that prides itself in being over the top and schmaltzy, trying to discredit it for doing what it set out to do is rather shortsighted. As for Parasyte I see it mostly as a action show, but what made it better was that it was also thoughtful and didn't have themes that weren't utilized. So it was a action show better than others because it had an actual theme and message to convey.
"You clearly like serious anime"
I clearly like all kinds of anime. If I only liked "serious" anime I would be one of those that hate OPM but clearly that isn't the case given that it's the 2nd show all 2015 seasonal year I've given a good score too, with the other being another over the top silly show, Jojo. So the only thing clear is that you're undermining me as a person with no validity to your claim.
And Proxy is a metaphysical show and not suppose to be something taken at face value, you're completely missing the purpose if you were expecting a point A to point B narrative. The show externalizes it's concept by giving it a physical form in the ways of the domes visited. Each of which represented a different aspect of "raison d'etre". May that be by a city that represented self-indulgence and escapism or a library that plays into finding one's identity. Each dome and each character lends to a multifaceted take on the concept the show had turned into a mantra. I think you've made the mistake many others have by taking things at face value. A conceptually driven show shouldn't be evaluated with that of a straight forward narrative driven one. And if that idea is something new to you then there isn't much else I can say in this conversation to point that out.
And any show I give a 10 is a show that I've clearly stated is only given that score for surpassing all my expectations and being one that personally connected with me like no show before or after it. None of my 10s are "perfect", but they're the closest thing I've seen that can hold that title for me as a viewer. And making a statement that you would reserve judgement for only novels and manga is absurd and rather foolish. Anime is it's own separate medium and should be regarded as such. And so is the case with novels and manga. And if you can judge a those mediums then you can and should also do the same for anime. And there are anime originals, which your logic dismisses altogether. Also there are anime that was made before getting a written form, so what you're saying is extremely misguided.
samui26 Sep 6, 2015 7:19 PM
I haven't seen Genshiken and I plan to watch that. Yes, Charlotte isn't anything bad but it was a disappointment when compared with other Key titles. Thanks by the way.

I agree. Episode ten was fine but.. you know, it could be better. There are a lot of poignant scenes which just flew over the viewers head because of the execution.
defunctmaluser Mar 12, 2015 9:03 PM
I like to think that manga as a medium is far more versatile than anime is. At least in manga, you're a success if you get published. Plus, there are great mangas like Oyasumi Punpun, Vagabond, and the like that just won't work if they're animated for various reasons like censorship, budget constraints, and all that shit.

To be fair though, Gintama is quite lovely although it's extremely overrated. One-Punch Man for the fucking win.
meteorcrash_996 Jan 5, 2015 2:42 PM
The review of cross ange was so relaxing to read.(unlike other reviews) good review good review (yes it needs to be said twice).
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login