Lavenlar said: As someone who's watched steins gate, steins gate 0, played steins gate, and steins gate 0, I prefer the OG story over 0. That's probably coz I really like Makise and dynamic with Okabe and her exclusion from 0 made it less engaging for me. I'll also add that the anime for SG0 actually only covers half the visual novel. The less eventful half too. You can't really blame anyone but if you liked the anime for SG0 then I HEAVILY recommend playing through the Visual novel to get the whole story. Yeah I really enjoyed 0, but the lack of Makise (a real one anyway lol) is what makes it fall behind the OG for me. |
| Yes, it was much better in my opinion (not to say the original was bad or anything). Even more interesting characters, less focus on Makise (not her biggest fan), more mysterious atmosphere, and better story direction (which is impressive since you end up knowing when and where it'll conclude logically). And most of all, Okabe Rintarou totally stealing the show. |
 |
| I have it slightly behind the original. I gave the original a 10 and 0 a 9 but it’s a very high 9 imo. 0 is truly amazing too, I’m glad other people think so too. |
| I love both the shows equally. When I watched 0, I found it to be as enjoyable as the original show. They are both great imo. |
| Nah, the OG 2011 anime all the way. But 0 did have its cool moments towards the end. |
RioFSJul 6, 2022 5:27 PM
 |
| The plot is so damn slow. Little to no comedy. Bad action scenes. Forgettable Villain. Kagari. Amadeus was nearly useless. As you can tell, i think it is so inferior to the original. |
" Kindness can sometimes lead you to trouble. "  |
| Nahh,original was way better |
 |
| no way. the OG is a masterpiece. That being said, as far as sequels that never needed to exist go, this one is not half bad. |
 |
| Original was better in my opinion, but I still really enjoyed S;G 0. I just missed Kurisu, she’s my favorite character and I love her and Okabe together. |
  |
| i think they both are amazing shows but s;g 0 only work that well cause you dont have that much mystery compared to watching s;g for the first time. on my second watch its hard to pick a favourite, they both have great moments but nothing beats the original. |
 “you’re immortal. Aren’t you?” “that’s a good line, put that one on my tombstone” -LOTGH  |
| The plot was significantly weaker in S;G 0, which is pretty much my only problem with the show. The characters and music were as amazing as ever. |
| A world without Makise Kurisu is a world I do not wish to live in. |
| I didn’t enjoy one more than the other but I’ll say this, it’s S;G 0 what makes S;G a 10 for me, so all rounded up they’re a 10. |
 ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ต๐ช๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ ๐ค๐ญ๐ฐ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ฆ๐บ๐ฆ๐ด, ๐ ๐ค๐ข๐ฏ’๐ต ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ. |
on 
| Definitely not me, 0 is a story that never needed to exist |
| steins gate > steins gate 0 |
 |
| I honestly can’t decide, but at the very least I love 0 just as much as the original. I loved Steins;Gate, but the grand scale of the plot doesn’t really leave much time to focus on the characters, instead focusing solely on Okabe’s struggle to reach the Steins;Gate world line. In 0 we get such a nice focus on all the characters, and such a cool tie-up of all the loose threads from the original series. I’m still super happy we got an adaptation of Steins;Gate 0 because it’s such a great addition to the whole story. |
 |
| Me here~ Fr that goosebumps when Okarin become Mad Scientist once again. |
 |
ChaosKishin said: I just finished 0 and honestly i would give it a 8/10. Sure, the story is pretty good but i believe they could've ventured forth on some untapped elements throughout the show. Like, with the OG you still had that sense of things somewhat making sense w/ equations and theories and whatnot. With 0, it just feels like fantasy w/ a hint of sci. like 10% sci and 90% fi, while the OG was 50/50 ik i probs shouldn't compare the two so heavily, considering they were years apart but if they carry the same name, then to me its just like comparing season one and two of an anime also i felt like 0 added to the story, but didnt add depth to it, u know? They are not season 1 and 2. Steins;Gate 0 is a side entry in the Steins;Gate subseries in the Science Adventure series. As a side entry, obviously it didn't have the same amount of budget and care as main entry |
| - |
| There were only some good episodes in S;G 0, the majority of it was average. So I will side with the original. |
  |
| Not much of a comparison the original was way better than 0. Sure 0 had its moments but it also had its bad ones too. |
| ...was astonished to realize that zero is much more serious business than og, which for me was actually quite a childish show. and no, i'm not speaking about the "depressed" atmosphere; but the very idea of all that happening. it really depicts the internal struggle of every person who tries to handle this world as seriously as possible, and the ending is truly amazing – depicting how things *truly are*. the same thing amazed me in mushishi, for example, where ginko had to cope with "incurable" illnesses |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Steins;Gate 0 Episode 8 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Mxxxstation - Aug 8, 2018 |
104 |
by Twerms
»»
Apr 21, 12:45 AM |
|
Poll: » Steins;Gate 0 Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Apr 11, 2018 |
572 |
by MrNobodyFN123
»»
Apr 18, 8:11 PM |
|
Poll: » Steins;Gate 0 Episode 19 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Mxxxstation - Aug 22, 2018 |
163 |
by Alrinth
»»
Apr 10, 2:36 PM |
|
Poll: » Steins;Gate 0 Episode 17 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Aug 8, 2018 |
197 |
by Alrinth
»»
Apr 9, 3:17 PM |
|
Poll: » Steins;Gate 0 Episode 11 DiscussionMxxxstation - Aug 8, 2018 |
38 |
by Alrinth
»»
Apr 7, 4:11 PM |