(Spoilers) Was Eren sacrifice have changed anything ?

Xenophorm12 said:
No, and I think that was the point. He committed a horrible crime and lost in the end. Think of him like Light Yagami. AnR theorist were delusional because it was clear that Isayama wasn't gonna make Eren win after what he's done.

JosephSaber40 said:


Yams previously stated he was preparing for an AnR tragic ending similar to the movie the mist but he changed it to spare the fans a tragic finale, really pathetic.

engich said:

You probably should read editor's interview where he says that it's fine if aot approves genocide because people will start to think that genocide is bad or something

engich said:

You probably should read editor's interview where he says that it's fine if aot approves genocide because people will start to think that genocide is bad or something

engich said:

I guess you can find it in another thread

My point is: editor doesn't make the ending look better with takes like this. Thanks to aot I'm finally able to understand that genocide is bad?

Also Eren treatment as some tragic hero is just bad. "Thank you", "What a man you are", etc.

engich said:

I guess you can find it in another thread


Edit: I saw tweets with 5k+ likes saying that "Eren should've been redeemed". I even saw a tweet saying that Eren is a Jesus of aot world.

Xenophorm12 said:
He changed it because he didn't wanna be called genocide approver. And that's the reason why Eldia got annihilated in the extra pages - you know, to show Eren's genocide didn't matter in the end and Fascist Eldian state probably didn't accept the peace offer proposed by remaining countries.

Ahsan_1 said:
Didn't change anything. That retard could have went with zeke's plan . He could have protected all of his friends as well as people until they died of old age. But the clown instead wiped out 80% of population and got his own country destroyed a few decades later.

JosephSaber40 said:


there are many bad guys who escaped punishment in history applying that in a coherent story doesn't necessarily means that the author approves of his action as we can see with the Eternal Champion, what matters in the story is consistency Isayama demonstrated perfectly how Eren was wrong with Ramzy's death, and showed us another better solutions like Kyomi's 50 years plan everyone knows that Eren was wrong not to sacrifice Historia to do what's right and that his biggest moral flaw, but in 139 the story glorifies hypocrisy we see Armin thanking Eren for his crimes before pretending to be the hero who killed him, we see the alliance mourn Eren's death, we see Mikasa visiting his grave throughout her lifetime despite his crimes seriously why she killed him in the first place, besides hypocrisy the story glorifies rape, Isayama portray the abusive relationship between Fritz and Ymir as true love story, not only Ymir he shipped Historia with her childhood bully, and put so much emphasis between EM where Eren explicitly insulted Mikasa telling her she's a slave.

nobody understands what's the moral of this story.

while AnR is about consequences, the consequence of hate, the consequence of incompetence and hesitation, the importance of putting your moral values above your loved ones (Eren clearly missed out that point), it's a realistic cruel ending with big impact.

Nameera said:
Like literally what was the point here?
First: If he have seen the future won't using founding Titian's power at the best should be done.

Second: Killing 80 percent population didn't had any point. Even though in the future paridise island was going to be destroyed.

Third: Ymir backstory don't do justice and most of the story have plot holes.

Fourth: How did he find freedom in all this?

( I am a diehard fan of Aot and I appreciate the ending no hate I just wanna listen to your opinion so I can figure out his whole plan)

Nameera said:

I am a diehard fan of Aot and I appreciate the ending no hate I just wanna listen to your opinion so I can figure out his whole plan

SaitamaTheman said:
I'm pretty sure a hundred years has passed when paradis got destroyed

engich said:

With FT power and ability to control titans he could save Hange btw. It seems that Karina Braun is a better "friend".

ezz365 said:


Here we go again.
He could have done many things but he did not do it so as not to risk the final result.

He had no intention of changing anything on that single timeline.

That is why it is said that destiny is already predetermined and that is why Eren is a prisoner of his own destiny.

Because the end result that he wants forced him to do things that he doesn't want.

Xenophorm12 said:
He changed it because he didn't wanna be called genocide approver. And that's the reason why Eldia got annihilated in the extra pages - you know, to show Eren's genocide didn't matter in the end and Fascist Eldian state probably didn't accept the peace offer proposed by remaining countries.