New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Nov 16, 12:16 PM
#501
| super good animation, sound design and a very faithful adaptation |
Nov 16, 4:57 PM
#502
| Watched this in the movie theaters yesterday. It was good - much more enjoyable than I thought it would be - considering that I dropped the manga in the middle of this arc. The anime is so much more engaging, and they certainly did an excellent job of showing just how charismatic Reze is. The animation was beautiful, the fights were great, some good comedy, and I love how Reze never pulled her punches. Makima continues to be my favorite character and her mysteriousness is what pulls me into this show. I'm dying to learn more about her. With that said, I don't think this movie is anything mindblowing. It didn't meet my expectations for how highly lauded this movie is. It was enjoyable, but it was straightforward and there wasn't much progress in the overall plot. Solid 7.5/10 movie for me. |
"As promised, all that you seek, all that we desire, is prepared up there. On top of the Tower." |
Nov 17, 7:16 PM
#503
Thread has been cleaned Keep discussion related to the Chainsaw Man Movie. |
Nov 18, 2:33 AM
#504
| Angel Devil best waifu |
Nov 19, 6:25 PM
#506
| movie 9/10 sound track 11/10 |
Nov 20, 11:32 AM
#507
Reply to Haunt88
flashy fights ≠ great fights
you can't even see most of the fights happening in way it's a form of skip clash, season 1 at least you can see most of the fights
this is a generic battle shounen with budget but a generic one nonetheless
1/10
you can't even see most of the fights happening in way it's a form of skip clash, season 1 at least you can see most of the fights
this is a generic battle shounen with budget but a generic one nonetheless
1/10
| @Haunt88 Agreed! Random colors and weird transitions ... nothing smart about the fight just action Characters are boring and nothing deep is happening I would rather rewatch naruto at least the fights are more creative and you can see what is happening |
Nov 20, 11:35 AM
#508
Reply to --Luminous--
@Haunt88
Are we running entirely off of vibes at this point?
If it was trying to be generic battle shounen, then it failed miserably by spending half the film on decidedly not-generic-battle-shounen content.
And if it was trying to be generic battle shounen, then it shouldn't have bothered trying to create sympathy or nuance to their relationship. May as well make it a lesson for MC Denji to never fall for women outside of his toxic workplace, like he should just focus on gains-maxxing!!! bro.
It's also funny you should bring up the budget, considering Demon Slayer spent 5 times Chainsaw's budget just to create a comparable film.
It's like you're trying to get us to find more reasons to glaze CSM.
Are we running entirely off of vibes at this point?
If it was trying to be generic battle shounen, then it failed miserably by spending half the film on decidedly not-generic-battle-shounen content.
And if it was trying to be generic battle shounen, then it shouldn't have bothered trying to create sympathy or nuance to their relationship. May as well make it a lesson for MC Denji to never fall for women outside of his toxic workplace, like he should just focus on gains-maxxing!!! bro.
It's also funny you should bring up the budget, considering Demon Slayer spent 5 times Chainsaw's budget just to create a comparable film.
It's like you're trying to get us to find more reasons to glaze CSM.
| @--Luminous-- LOL are you serious! Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ... |
Nov 20, 6:39 PM
#509
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@--Luminous-- LOL are you serious!
Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn
Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation
You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ...
Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn
Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation
You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ...
| @UaEfAlCoN83 Hyperbole is dead apparently, because you killed it. I am perfectly comfortable letting other people judge and compare the quality of the animation on their own terms, something you seem to have a trouble with as you try to shout down people with wacky claims and underhanded insults for liking something you seem opposed to from the start. For that matter, I find it weird you're ogling the fidelity of frames instead of the cohesion and effect of animation as a whole, and passing that off as judgment on the latter instead of the former. Personally, I found no unjustified aberrations with the cleanliness of the character models, the backgrounds nor the animation at any point except during moments of fast-paced camera panning transitions that practically demanded a touch of motion blur and in two specific scenes, Denji upper half being blown to bits and falling through the typhoon. The former had wavy lines to convey the heat from the impact zone, the second was to convey the sheer chaos of being blown around by 100+ mph winds via animated squash-and-stretch. Nothing that stands out as offensive to the layman, nor could be considered as the result of animators taking shortcuts on their self-funded passion project. |
Nov 20, 7:01 PM
#510
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@--Luminous-- LOL are you serious!
Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn
Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation
You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ...
Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn
Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation
You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ...
| @UaEfAlCoN83 talking about mappa using CGI while demon slayer had a lot more CGI and demon slayer does not have better animation than the CSM movie |
lalinduNov 20, 7:07 PM
Nov 20, 7:06 PM
#511
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@--Luminous-- LOL are you serious!
Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn
Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation
You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ...
Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn
Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation
You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ...
| @UaEfAlCoN83 animation isn't judged by pausing scenes and analysing a single frame,also CGI is more expensive than 2d animation |
Nov 20, 9:40 PM
#512
Reply to --Luminous--
@UaEfAlCoN83 Hyperbole is dead apparently, because you killed it. I am perfectly comfortable letting other people judge and compare the quality of the animation on their own terms, something you seem to have a trouble with as you try to shout down people with wacky claims and underhanded insults for liking something you seem opposed to from the start.
For that matter, I find it weird you're ogling the fidelity of frames instead of the cohesion and effect of animation as a whole, and passing that off as judgment on the latter instead of the former. Personally, I found no unjustified aberrations with the cleanliness of the character models, the backgrounds nor the animation at any point except during moments of fast-paced camera panning transitions that practically demanded a touch of motion blur and in two specific scenes, Denji upper half being blown to bits and falling through the typhoon. The former had wavy lines to convey the heat from the impact zone, the second was to convey the sheer chaos of being blown around by 100+ mph winds via animated squash-and-stretch. Nothing that stands out as offensive to the layman, nor could be considered as the result of animators taking shortcuts on their self-funded passion project.
For that matter, I find it weird you're ogling the fidelity of frames instead of the cohesion and effect of animation as a whole, and passing that off as judgment on the latter instead of the former. Personally, I found no unjustified aberrations with the cleanliness of the character models, the backgrounds nor the animation at any point except during moments of fast-paced camera panning transitions that practically demanded a touch of motion blur and in two specific scenes, Denji upper half being blown to bits and falling through the typhoon. The former had wavy lines to convey the heat from the impact zone, the second was to convey the sheer chaos of being blown around by 100+ mph winds via animated squash-and-stretch. Nothing that stands out as offensive to the layman, nor could be considered as the result of animators taking shortcuts on their self-funded passion project.
| @--Luminous-- You gave me an article but ok First of all I worked as a designer so I have my own preferences because animation involves designing ... and I used to do some animation starting from Adobe flash to Anime Studio (which I think is now called something else) ... I created my own animation but I wouldn't call myself an animator still I have an experience Let's talk now about my take Mappa adds weird effects that I find cheap ... these effects are mostly filters They also change angles a lot for no reason and in the process they try to animate the character within this mess of "moving camera" so they start drawing characters with minimal and goffy details to deliver the feeling that the character is moving fast but the process of creating such an effect using this method is also cheap because frames don't take much time compared to well drawn frames for cgi I never minded it ... I watched Ajin and Houseki no kuni; both of them use CGI and I like both animes ... my point was CGI is cheaper and Mappa -- while fights in the movie were hand-drawn --- they still used CGI for normal scenes this mean that you need to design the character once and move it you don't need to draw 24 frames for each second and you don't need to bother with effects like the effect of moving hair in a windy setting because this can be easily done in applications like 3D max and other 3d applications Yes animation still cost money but that person compared the quality of CSM's movie to DS's movie and claimed that with less budget Mappa surpassed UFOtable which is 100% not true You are annoyed because someone doesn't agree with you which is sad ... I don't care about your explanation I am saying such effects are cheap compared to other methods that can deliver that sensation But to sum up if people enjoy this weird animation then sure let them enjoy it but in terms of cost it is not expensive Did you enjoy the movie? I am glad Mappa is not paying you so no reason to take things personally Have a good day |
Nov 20, 9:44 PM
#513
Reply to lalindu
@UaEfAlCoN83 talking about mappa using CGI while demon slayer had a lot more CGI and demon slayer does not have better animation than the CSM movie
| @lalindu I believe DS has better animation but it is up to you if you don't believe so and it terms of CGI I am not against it but let's be real mappa used CGI for all character except fights while DS had hand-drawn characters with no CGI If you are talking about backgrounds and other effects everyone uses CGI but for CGI to be the main animation method it is generally cheaper from 2D which is a fact ... cheaper doesn't mean bad I watch CGI shows and I am fine with them ... in fact the cgi that mappa creates is good and I don't mind it at all I rated S1 6/10 bcs of the plot not the animation ... same for the movie ... I never rate based on animation so my take on animation is not affected by "enjoyment" or "fandom" |
Nov 20, 9:52 PM
#514
Reply to lalindu
@UaEfAlCoN83 animation isn't judged by pausing scenes and analysing a single frame,also CGI is more expensive than 2d animation
| @lalindu This is 100% not true CGI used in anime is way cheaper than 2d animation if you are talking about Diseny-level CGI then yes it gets expensive but generally CGI requires less effort you create the environment and characters then start moving things while 2d required drawing every single frame and pausing scenes does count because a detailed frame is more expensive than blurry frame I did some animation before back in 2007 using Flash and Anime studio ... less details = less effort => cheaper This is a fact ... and this is why studios now use CGI for mechas, vehicles and for giant characters because it is way cheaper than drawing all these details hundreds and thousands of times ... CGI is also used for backgrounds like in DS they used CGI for the infinity castle and most animes with heavy action use CGI for buildings and stuff because it is cheaper and faster I talk from experience and knowledge but IK you will keep on arguing bcs this is how fans act on this website |
Nov 20, 10:20 PM
#515
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@--Luminous-- LOL are you serious!
Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn
Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation
You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ...
Demon slayer has 100000x better animation with clean frames ... you can see what is happening ... every single frame is clear and well drawn
Chainsaw? Pause the movie and you will always find blurry frames with weird effects ... weird angles ... as soon as the fight starts they draw less details ... and guess what? they heavily rely on CGI which is way cheaper than 2D animation
You are one of these people tricked by Mappa's laziness ...
| @UaEfAlCoN83 Bro, you’re judging Chainsaw Man with zero understanding of animation. Demon Slayer and CSM use completely different styles. Demon Slayer is made to look clean and polished every frame. Chainsaw Man aims for a cinematic, realistic look, motion blur, dynamic camera angles, and hybrid CGI are part of that style, not laziness. Blurry frames and weird angles are literally intentional film techniques, not mistakes. MAPPA didn’t “trick” anyone you’re just mistaking a different art style for bad animation. Both shows are 10/10 in their own style. You just don’t know how to read animation. |
Nov 21, 12:32 AM
#516
Reply to GoodBoy0069
@UaEfAlCoN83 Bro, you’re judging Chainsaw Man with zero understanding of animation. Demon Slayer and CSM use completely different styles.
Demon Slayer is made to look clean and polished every frame.
Chainsaw Man aims for a cinematic, realistic look, motion blur, dynamic camera angles, and hybrid CGI are part of that style, not laziness.
Blurry frames and weird angles are literally intentional film techniques, not mistakes. MAPPA didn’t “trick” anyone you’re just mistaking a different art style for bad animation.
Both shows are 10/10 in their own style. You just don’t know how to read animation.
Demon Slayer is made to look clean and polished every frame.
Chainsaw Man aims for a cinematic, realistic look, motion blur, dynamic camera angles, and hybrid CGI are part of that style, not laziness.
Blurry frames and weird angles are literally intentional film techniques, not mistakes. MAPPA didn’t “trick” anyone you’re just mistaking a different art style for bad animation.
Both shows are 10/10 in their own style. You just don’t know how to read animation.
| @GoodBoy0069 No one said mistakes Ik they are different styles but some styles are cheaper from others My point was to refute the budget argument that CSM had lower budget but surpassed DS which is very biased and subjective But when you look objectively techniques and styles used in DS are more expensive because of the required details Also different styles can still be compared … blurry frames are cheaper Weird angles makes it hard to follow what is happening Entertainment is key here … what is the point if I cannot see what’s happening because of “style” It is like when dragon ball puts lightening effects because characters are move quickly and it is realistic … this is cheap Many styles portray “speed” and maintain “realistic” animation without the need for cheap techniques I used to animate my own shitty cartoon years ago and Ik what i am talking about And similar to how you think i don’t understand animation I also believe you don’t understand it Great we are stuck |
Nov 21, 12:44 AM
#517
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@GoodBoy0069
No one said mistakes
Ik they are different styles but some styles are cheaper from others
My point was to refute the budget argument that CSM had lower budget but surpassed DS which is very biased and subjective
But when you look objectively techniques and styles used in DS are more expensive because of the required details
Also different styles can still be compared … blurry frames are cheaper
Weird angles makes it hard to follow what is happening
Entertainment is key here … what is the point if I cannot see what’s happening because of “style”
It is like when dragon ball puts lightening effects because characters are move quickly and it is realistic … this is cheap
Many styles portray “speed” and maintain “realistic” animation without the need for cheap techniques
I used to animate my own shitty cartoon years ago and Ik what i am talking about
And similar to how you think i don’t understand animation I also believe you don’t understand it
Great we are stuck
No one said mistakes
Ik they are different styles but some styles are cheaper from others
My point was to refute the budget argument that CSM had lower budget but surpassed DS which is very biased and subjective
But when you look objectively techniques and styles used in DS are more expensive because of the required details
Also different styles can still be compared … blurry frames are cheaper
Weird angles makes it hard to follow what is happening
Entertainment is key here … what is the point if I cannot see what’s happening because of “style”
It is like when dragon ball puts lightening effects because characters are move quickly and it is realistic … this is cheap
Many styles portray “speed” and maintain “realistic” animation without the need for cheap techniques
I used to animate my own shitty cartoon years ago and Ik what i am talking about
And similar to how you think i don’t understand animation I also believe you don’t understand it
Great we are stuck
| @UaEfAlCoN83 Man, you’re pushing arguments that don’t hold up. Different styles can be compared, but calling certain techniques “cheap” just because they don’t match your taste isn’t objective at all. Blurry frames, weird angles, motion effects all of these depend on the artistic direction, not the budget. High-detail doesn’t automatically mean expensive, and dynamic camera work doesn’t automatically mean cheap. Studios choose tools based on what they want the scene to feel like, not because they’re cutting corners. And bringing up your old animations doesn’t make your point stronger any more than mine does. We’re both clearly stuck in “my style > your style” territory. Let’s just stop pretending these are factual claims. You dislike CSM’s artistic choices that’s fine. But don’t frame personal preference as objective truth or budget science. |
Nov 21, 12:51 AM
#518
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@lalindu
I believe DS has better animation but it is up to you if you don't believe so
and it terms of CGI I am not against it but let's be real mappa used CGI for all character except fights while DS had hand-drawn characters with no CGI
If you are talking about backgrounds and other effects everyone uses CGI
but for CGI to be the main animation method it is generally cheaper from 2D which is a fact ... cheaper doesn't mean bad
I watch CGI shows and I am fine with them ... in fact the cgi that mappa creates is good and I don't mind it at all
I rated S1 6/10 bcs of the plot not the animation ... same for the movie ... I never rate based on animation so my take on animation is not affected by "enjoyment" or "fandom"
I believe DS has better animation but it is up to you if you don't believe so
and it terms of CGI I am not against it but let's be real mappa used CGI for all character except fights while DS had hand-drawn characters with no CGI
If you are talking about backgrounds and other effects everyone uses CGI
but for CGI to be the main animation method it is generally cheaper from 2D which is a fact ... cheaper doesn't mean bad
I watch CGI shows and I am fine with them ... in fact the cgi that mappa creates is good and I don't mind it at all
I rated S1 6/10 bcs of the plot not the animation ... same for the movie ... I never rate based on animation so my take on animation is not affected by "enjoyment" or "fandom"
| @UaEfAlCoN83 there were minimal CGI in the CGI movie while demon slayer had lot of CGI |
Nov 21, 12:56 AM
#519
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@lalindu This is 100% not true
CGI used in anime is way cheaper than 2d animation
if you are talking about Diseny-level CGI then yes it gets expensive but generally CGI requires less effort you create the environment and characters then start moving things while 2d required drawing every single frame
and pausing scenes does count because a detailed frame is more expensive than blurry frame
I did some animation before back in 2007 using Flash and Anime studio ... less details = less effort => cheaper
This is a fact ... and this is why studios now use CGI for mechas, vehicles and for giant characters because it is way cheaper than drawing all these details hundreds and thousands of times ... CGI is also used for backgrounds like in DS they used CGI for the infinity castle and most animes with heavy action use CGI for buildings and stuff because it is cheaper and faster
I talk from experience and knowledge but IK you will keep on arguing bcs this is how fans act on this website
CGI used in anime is way cheaper than 2d animation
if you are talking about Diseny-level CGI then yes it gets expensive but generally CGI requires less effort you create the environment and characters then start moving things while 2d required drawing every single frame
and pausing scenes does count because a detailed frame is more expensive than blurry frame
I did some animation before back in 2007 using Flash and Anime studio ... less details = less effort => cheaper
This is a fact ... and this is why studios now use CGI for mechas, vehicles and for giant characters because it is way cheaper than drawing all these details hundreds and thousands of times ... CGI is also used for backgrounds like in DS they used CGI for the infinity castle and most animes with heavy action use CGI for buildings and stuff because it is cheaper and faster
I talk from experience and knowledge but IK you will keep on arguing bcs this is how fans act on this website
| @UaEfAlCoN83 you're delusional if you think the animation in CSM is less effort just because it's not on model when you pause ever time like demon slayer,they have completely different styles |
Nov 21, 4:03 AM
#520
Reply to lalindu
@UaEfAlCoN83 you're delusional if you think the animation in CSM is less effort just because it's not on model when you pause ever time like demon slayer,they have completely different styles
| @lalindu I will lend you a tissue after you stop crying no worries I know people like you can’t accept reality and cry over their favorite animes |
Nov 21, 4:21 AM
#521
Reply to GoodBoy0069
@UaEfAlCoN83 Man, you’re pushing arguments that don’t hold up.
Different styles can be compared, but calling certain techniques “cheap” just because they don’t match your taste isn’t objective at all.
Blurry frames, weird angles, motion effects all of these depend on the artistic direction, not the budget. High-detail doesn’t automatically mean expensive, and dynamic camera work doesn’t automatically mean cheap. Studios choose tools based on what they want the scene to feel like, not because they’re cutting corners.
And bringing up your old animations doesn’t make your point stronger any more than mine does. We’re both clearly stuck in “my style > your style” territory.
Let’s just stop pretending these are factual claims. You dislike CSM’s artistic choices that’s fine. But don’t frame personal preference as objective truth or budget science.
Different styles can be compared, but calling certain techniques “cheap” just because they don’t match your taste isn’t objective at all.
Blurry frames, weird angles, motion effects all of these depend on the artistic direction, not the budget. High-detail doesn’t automatically mean expensive, and dynamic camera work doesn’t automatically mean cheap. Studios choose tools based on what they want the scene to feel like, not because they’re cutting corners.
And bringing up your old animations doesn’t make your point stronger any more than mine does. We’re both clearly stuck in “my style > your style” territory.
Let’s just stop pretending these are factual claims. You dislike CSM’s artistic choices that’s fine. But don’t frame personal preference as objective truth or budget science.
| @GoodBoy0069 Cheap in terms of cost bro and cheap compared to other styles The entire argument was against someone who had weird claims about budget so I said Mappa used cheaper techniques including CGI for designing characters Cheap ≠ a price I can afford and it doesn’t mean they are cutting corners Yes i called it lazy because I believe so and people might disagree But we bad budget X that brought Y to us … it is simple People in the industry are underpaid and Mappa actually one of the studios that pay more compared to others because a lot of their animators left Madhouse because they were being underpaid Anyways yes I dislike the style but that’s definitely not why I believe their techniques are cheap For example Wit had high quality animation for SnK but in S3 they used CGI for one of the titans why because they had lower budget Houseki no kuni used cgi for the entire anime … it is high quality cgi if you look at the industry and I like it but it is still “cheap” compared with to other styles despite me liking it HxH 1998 had nicer style in my opinion compared to HxH 2011 but we all know 2011 had higher budget and better animation just because I like the older style doesn’t mean I will attack 2011 People hated CSM 1 because of CGI when it wasn’t even bad CGI but they automatically have this mentality CGI = bad So again you believe I hate the style therefore I will attack the style by calling it cheap … no correlation I assure you But anyways I respect your opinion and I will accept that I might be wrong even if I strongly believe it is not but still no one really knows the amount of actual work behind it except people involved I respect animators’ efforts so whatever I said wasn’t really meant as attacks — just to clarify my take Good? Have a good day let’s not waste time on budget it is not like we are getting paid for this discussion once they pay us let’s come back 😂 |
Nov 21, 4:52 AM
#522
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@--Luminous-- You gave me an article but ok
First of all I worked as a designer so I have my own preferences because animation involves designing ... and I used to do some animation starting from Adobe flash to Anime Studio (which I think is now called something else) ... I created my own animation but I wouldn't call myself an animator still I have an experience
Let's talk now about my take
Mappa adds weird effects that I find cheap ... these effects are mostly filters
They also change angles a lot for no reason and in the process they try to animate the character within this mess of "moving camera" so they start drawing characters with minimal and goffy details to deliver the feeling that the character is moving fast but the process of creating such an effect using this method is also cheap because frames don't take much time compared to well drawn frames
for cgi I never minded it ... I watched Ajin and Houseki no kuni; both of them use CGI and I like both animes ... my point was CGI is cheaper and Mappa -- while fights in the movie were hand-drawn --- they still used CGI for normal scenes this mean that you need to design the character once and move it you don't need to draw 24 frames for each second and you don't need to bother with effects like the effect of moving hair in a windy setting because this can be easily done in applications like 3D max and other 3d applications
Yes animation still cost money but that person compared the quality of CSM's movie to DS's movie and claimed that with less budget Mappa surpassed UFOtable which is 100% not true
You are annoyed because someone doesn't agree with you which is sad ... I don't care about your explanation I am saying such effects are cheap compared to other methods that can deliver that sensation
But to sum up if people enjoy this weird animation then sure let them enjoy it but in terms of cost it is not expensive
Did you enjoy the movie? I am glad
Mappa is not paying you so no reason to take things personally
Have a good day
First of all I worked as a designer so I have my own preferences because animation involves designing ... and I used to do some animation starting from Adobe flash to Anime Studio (which I think is now called something else) ... I created my own animation but I wouldn't call myself an animator still I have an experience
Let's talk now about my take
Mappa adds weird effects that I find cheap ... these effects are mostly filters
They also change angles a lot for no reason and in the process they try to animate the character within this mess of "moving camera" so they start drawing characters with minimal and goffy details to deliver the feeling that the character is moving fast but the process of creating such an effect using this method is also cheap because frames don't take much time compared to well drawn frames
for cgi I never minded it ... I watched Ajin and Houseki no kuni; both of them use CGI and I like both animes ... my point was CGI is cheaper and Mappa -- while fights in the movie were hand-drawn --- they still used CGI for normal scenes this mean that you need to design the character once and move it you don't need to draw 24 frames for each second and you don't need to bother with effects like the effect of moving hair in a windy setting because this can be easily done in applications like 3D max and other 3d applications
Yes animation still cost money but that person compared the quality of CSM's movie to DS's movie and claimed that with less budget Mappa surpassed UFOtable which is 100% not true
You are annoyed because someone doesn't agree with you which is sad ... I don't care about your explanation I am saying such effects are cheap compared to other methods that can deliver that sensation
But to sum up if people enjoy this weird animation then sure let them enjoy it but in terms of cost it is not expensive
Did you enjoy the movie? I am glad
Mappa is not paying you so no reason to take things personally
Have a good day
| @UaEfAlCoN83 It's been a few days since I wrote something that was apparently misconstrued. I never said CSM was making superior animation with less budget than DS. What I said was that at the end of the day, DS movie had a budget that, at that time, was reportedly 5 times higher than CSM for a movie whose overall audiovisual narrative quality, not just animation, could easily be compared (and thus debated) about which is better or not, even though I don't believe in these kinds of rankings at this technical level of proficiency on display. Both works lean into the strengths of their styles of animation for what they hoped to achieve, so I would be remiss in thinking particular taste in one or the other indicates anything about quality. However, what is clear to me is that DS didn't pull out that 100% of stops and then some that would give it a clear edge in animation, and I don't think I am alone in saying this. If there's anything I'm annoyed about, it's that the conversation is headed in a contentious direction because of more people misconstruing what has been claimed and making more pointed claims in return. It's not an argument that will be solved by a comparison of frames or styles or wild guesses at what the animators are doing behind the scenes to create the animation when we don't have that information. For that matter the only CGI I can confirm in CSM is one overhead flyby shot in the Pool scene and the cars in the road chase scene, both practical choices for the cinematography direction in those scenes. Though I will admit it is somewhat aggravating that you would claim someone is on Mappa's payroll simply for posting about and backing up their observations that contradict yours. Is that not a pre-emptive case of 'attacking the messenger'? |
Nov 21, 7:28 AM
#523
Reply to UaEfAlCoN83
@lalindu I will lend you a tissue after you stop crying no worries I know people like you can’t accept reality and cry over their favorite animes
| @UaEfAlCoN83 so by your logic demon slayer is cheap because they use CGI and digital effects |
lalinduNov 21, 7:36 AM
Nov 22, 8:07 AM
#524
| Honestly, I'm not a Chainsaw Man fan. I went to see the movie simply because I liked it "enough". And yeah, it was really good. First half was a bit lacking at times, but then second made up for it. I'll admit though, I hoped for Reze to survive, however naive that was... Let's hope they continue adapting it, because I really want to know more about Makima. |
SomeMageNov 22, 8:16 AM
Nov 22, 9:30 PM
#525
| must watch in 3D, was very well made for a 3D animated movie. |
Nov 26, 6:40 AM
#526
| Damn that was fantastic watching this in theaters! The introduction for Reze was great, such a charismatic and fun character. Though I would've loved to be a bit more invested into her story, the ending didn't hit me as hard as it supposedly did for other people. But man the animation and art style were so damn good, not just the action scenes either - which were just breathtaking! Definitely going to rewatch this whenever a sequel comes out or maybe even when the bluray comes out. Maybe the emotional beats don't hit as hard but it sure as hell makes up for it with it's style and animation! Also the credits song is so good, great choice for the ending after fully knowing the lyrics. |
Nov 26, 8:19 AM
#527
| Absolute cinema, loved every bit of it. I've read the manga before seeing it; MAPPA did the manga so, so much justice, especially Beam!! |
Nov 27, 12:01 PM
#530
| animation took a turn which was a surprise but a good one nonetheless. the one thing that confused me a bit was that it was a lot of action so i got lost for a little bit on the plot but it all got together at the end |
Nov 27, 3:21 PM
#531
| its peak I'm telling you its absolute peak |
Nov 27, 7:05 PM
#532
Thread Cleaned Removed spam posts. |
Maloween 2025 candies: |
Nov 28, 5:17 PM
#533
| sadly there's no alternate ending :( |
Dec 6, 8:36 PM
#536
| Utter and complete perfection of a movie/adaptation. After watching this movie and seeing the panels from the manga so faithfully recreated and lovingly expanded upon has not only solidified this movie as a masterpiece of animation, cinematography, score, and storytelling. But also confirms Fujimoto's contract with the adaptation and film devils respectively(IMO), what he gave in return for this said contract, I have no idea, but it's paid off in some of the finest art I've seen put to screen in a LONG time. |
Dec 7, 3:42 PM
#537
| MUITO BOM!!!!!!!!!! |
Dec 8, 5:52 AM
#538
| It was so beautiful, beginning to end the art of details and the emotions portrayed. Must watch even if you are not an anime watcher. You WILL enjoy it. |
Dec 8, 5:53 AM
#539
| It was so beautiful, beginning to end the art of details and the emotions portrayed. Must watch even if you are not an anime watcher. You WILL enjoy it. |
Dec 8, 1:36 PM
#540
| great anime, enjoyed it a lot. |
Dec 8, 5:05 PM
#541
| the animation reminded me of that experimental 60fps from MPC-HC. it was cool at first but i wish i could have disabled it. i wish there was a character introduction for the shark boy. give me the story why he's a fan of csm so much rather than just plopping him in. i think the story didnt deserve a theatrical release. its like those 90s DBZ filler movies where the story isnt canon but i think this one is. i kinda enjoyed the slow burn from the first half. i was intrigued on where they gonna go with it. then they spammed special effects on the second half because apparently thats whats "peak" is these days. i prefer where the fights are choreographed properly so it makes sense loved the stylish ending. i wonder why makima didnt helped during that big fight? maybe she was doing something with power? |
| My Guitar Covers: Playlist I CAN ALWAYS SHOW MY EVERYTHING TO YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUU |
Dec 8, 5:23 PM
#542
| No doubt the best animated movie oat I liked every soundtrack and song, They extended the pool scene in comparison to the manga With a great soundtrack(in the pool) which makes this movie the best, Jane Doe(ending theme) is my personal favorite,The emotions in the movie were felt much more than in the manga, Overall it deserves 10/10 from my side |
Mitaka09Dec 8, 5:29 PM
Dec 8, 5:47 PM
#543
| Rewatched it at home and I can say it's still amazing. I was thinking, maybe, it's the theatre experience that made it so good, but I believe it still deserves the 10/10 I gave it when watching at home. It certainly leaves you with a particular feeling, haha. The animation was breathtaking, but what really makes it stand out is the sound design, music and voice acting. |
Dec 8, 10:11 PM
#544
| Rewatched the movie and it's just as good when I watched it in the theatres |
Dec 9, 1:28 AM
#545
| GUYS! THIS SHI IS ABSOLUTE CINEMA. PEAKEST SHOW I'VE EVER SEEN. THE MUSIC, THE ANIMATION, EVERYTHING WAS JUST SOO GOOD AND SMOOTH. |
Dec 9, 4:38 AM
#546
| It was great and fun. I liked the scene at the end where they're washed ashore and Denji reconveyed his feelings to Reze. He reiterated back to her about running away together, but this time without hesitation. The school stuff, the tale with the mice, and what Kishibe revealed about Reze -- all of it connects and helps you understand her character more. When Reze told Aki she preferred not to kill anyone, I could believe her now. She's a lot like Denji. Beneath all the forced smiles and laughter, there's a sense of loneliness and sadness in their words. Oh and the imagery of the spider and butterfly when Reze was teaching Denji how to swim in the pool, then coming full circle at the end with both of them sinking together into the sea. Wow. |
Dec 9, 5:14 AM
#547
Dec 9, 7:14 AM
#548
| This is gonna be my last review on this movie: Before I say anything I still think this is my movie of the year and that this really captured the manga better than S1 did. It didn’t sacrifice some themes and was as chaotic as the part 1 manga. It makes me hyped to see S2, the best parts of CSM to get adapted, even with the fandom turning dislikable very fast imo. With all the positives out of the way, this could have the worst problems in writing I have seen: underdeveloped romance relationship (yes compared to other romance parts in other movies, this is underdeveloped). The tonal whiplash problems are starting to appear here with how fast things get to be so chaotic. The fights eventhough so much better than manga counterparts really rely on visual impacts a loooot. So for example other than seeming to be about characters acting in smart ways to win, the actions are so random and chaotic like the action set piece is that it’s just fun to watch but no substance imo (unlike jjk or hxh fights, where it feels the characters and actions taken are more calculated). Reze character and the arc even seem to be in a very weird place for me, maybe because I know what will happen in the future, but it’s like she started out to manipulate Denji then showed him basic steps in what love should be, then she fell for him? Yeah in just 40 minutes, people wouldn’t even be able to process or connect with this imo. Finally the final confrontation between Denji and Reze, eventhough is a call out to their pool scene is built on conveniently with how she literally punched him towards the water for some reason. It’s cool but is built on plot armor and convenience so much that I find it ironic in some way. There are other negatives I see from the movie, even ones that unfortunately are based on my knowledge in manga like how the arc acts like a filler (the events happening here don’t have a significant effect on anything in future, it’s just like let me say without spoiling, the events following this actually make the events of this arc seem useless). Not saying all my negatives are based on my knowledge of the manga’s future eventhough there are some like I said (part 2 for example makes it very apparent that fujimoto never took this arc seriously, and yes part 2 does have a problem that made the whole series not as good as it was in part 1). So in summary: romance really isn’t that good and fights aren’t that good. It’s just imo everything is turned up with the excellent direction and animation. Again not saying there aren’t positives, there are and there is a reason why I said this is my movie of the year. I know this review of mine may annoy some fans, but it is my opinion. I amnot here to say everything is perfect. I am here to say why I think it is overrated and why this movie in particular needs to be studied on why shounen fans in particular loved it. I may delve in it but it will just devolve into more yapping from me and make the review more like a very big blog. I hope the ones enjoying enjoy it for what it is, without annoying the ones not enjoying it as much and vice versa. Maybe watching this three times really wasn’t a good idea for me lol |
Dec 9, 9:27 AM
#550
| I watched it and I’m not surprised by anything. Some manipulator chick is the main villain. Seriously? Makima 2.0 but with a different wig and on the opposite side. Besides seductive girls, can this anime do anything else? Another nut-bait job just like the first season. This seductiveness is all over this show and I'm already sick of it. At least the directing was definitely better than in the first season, because this time there was no forcing that wannabe cinematic vibe. The animation is mostly good, BUT… 1. In many action sequences you simply can’t tell what’s happening on screen. Sure, it’s supposed to be chaotic, but the chaos should be for the characters, not for the viewer who literally can’t see what’s going on. 2. There were also parts where the characters moved like they were missing in-between frames, making their movements inconsistent to the point of giving me slight dizziness. Watching Infinity Castle didn’t give me reactions like that. That’s not professional. It really feels like some shots were done by less experienced animators or they just ran out of time, which is not defensible with such a simple and sometimes downright ugly art style. Speaking of which, the art style. I’m really not a fan of simplifying the details so much. I get doing it in a very complex action shot, but not for the whole damn movie. Comparing it to the last movie I watched, Infinity Castle, I’d say both films are on the same level. One has good technical production but a pretty weak story (DS), and the other has okayish technical production (mostly animation and only in some places, the art style doesn’t even come close to DS), but story-wise it’s another nut-bait job. Better than DS, but only slightly. CSM would probably end up being the best film of the year for me, but I still have 100m to watch and since it’s from the author of Orb, I can be sure 100m will be better for me than both of the previously mentioned ones. CSM doesn’t deserve top 2 oat, but I see the glazers and annoying fandom are hyped just because there’s a lot of movement on screen, even when it has zero coherence or readability. And from the comments, it seems like this movie doesn’t even have any impact on future events, which makes it feel even more like a waste of time. What was the point then? And I probably wouldn’t be nitpicking if it was a filler movie like Black Clover, but here the fillerness exists in the manga itself. In short: Direction: very good. Art style: crap. That note at the end about not using the film for AI training made me laugh a bit. I fully support that stance, but I don’t know who would even want to generate such an ugly, detailless style anyway xD Animation: good, but only in some places, considering my earlier complaints about it. Story: good, but far from great. A bit of artificial romance, a bit of action (often with no coherence) |
More topics from this board
» Manga readers, I need to know one spoilerCipherKen - Yesterday |
14 |
by TopgunUK
»»
6 hours ago |
|
» Second Movie or Season 2?GiftShop - Oct 28 |
37 |
by soumyabb2356
»»
10 hours ago |
|
» After finishing the movie I realized I had misjudged Chainsaw Man.Shokodash - Dec 12 |
14 |
by Ripperdoc
»»
Today, 10:26 AM |
|
» Tatsuya Yoshihara appreciation postLaplace_kun - Yesterday |
10 |
by Oreki_Houtaro24
»»
Today, 4:54 AM |
|
» whats ur favourite shot or cut of the movie?yg - Dec 12 |
20 |
by lalindu
»»
Today, 3:39 AM |