Is K-On worth watching?

LoneWolfRain said:
The quality of anything is indeed subjective, my friend.

romagia said:
the animation quality of K-on is objectively better than the animation quality of low budget SoLs

SolviteSekai said:
This thread is dumb.

LoneWolfRain said:
You clearly don't know the definition of the word "objective."

You can list every example of a low budget SoL in the book, but that wouldn't change the fact that whether or not they are of quality is subjective; a matter of opinion.

Then stop posting.

SolviteSekai said:

People who say everything is subjective are idiots who want to sound profound.

Everything is not subjective.

Speed is not subjective. Weight is not subjective. Two Bananas are objectively more bananas than one banana.

It's the same people who try to sound smart by acting pretentious on mal who bash anime unless it is pretentious.

LoneWolfRain said:
You clearly don't know the definition of the word "objective."

You can list every example of a low budget SoL in the book, but that wouldn't change the fact that whether or not they are of quality is subjective; a matter of opinion.

romagia said:

i was obviously talking about the animation quality;
huge differences in animation quality should be obvious even to people who don't know anything about animation

LoneWolfRain said:
No shit you were talking about animation quality. All I said was that the quality of animation is subjective; just like it is for characterization, plot, music, and any other aspect of the animation medium.

I never denied that more work is put into some anime than others and some anime are more fluid, accurately drawn, etc. than others. However, it's still subjective because an argument can be made against why something is the way it is, regardless of the noticeable differences.