New
Oct 18, 1:19 PM
#1
| I’ve been noticing a pattern, especially on X. Every time an anime girl design drops, there’s always a wave of people calling it “problematic” or “sexist.” But honestly, I can’t help but feel like a lot of it comes from insecurity. Anime girls are literally drawings, yet people get so upset because they’re too “unrealistic” or “overly sexualized.” Maybe the real issue is that these characters are drawn to be attractive in a way that makes some people feel insecure or jealous because, let’s be real, they look hotter than most real people ever could. |
Oct 18, 1:55 PM
#3
Oct 18, 1:59 PM
#4
| Aren't you projecting? Because from where I stand, every couple of days one of the 14 years olds starts a new topic about this, being defensive about his love for ecchi. And all the same people write the same comments. |
Oct 18, 2:02 PM
#5
| some of it is sure rooted in envy but other times its rooted in shame and even culture like religion and globally there are still more religious people |
Oct 18, 2:08 PM
#6
| With the amount of people that say, "these are literal drawings", may I remind the point that's even more applicable, "these are literal posts, log off and touch grass if you are that bothered". A lot you filter the world through, "what do x people say about something?" rather than care to consume the media you want to consume without getting involved with opinions online. It's why like 9/10ths of aniYTber content is, "LIBS AND THE WOKE TRIGGERED BY NEW X EVENT" and is the most insufferable part of YouTube and Twitter as a platform. If I had a nickel for every time this exact scenario happened, I'd be richer than Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk combined |
Oct 18, 2:14 PM
#7
Reply to RyanWiseman
With the amount of people that say, "these are literal drawings", may I remind the point that's even more applicable, "these are literal posts, log off and touch grass if you are that bothered". A lot you filter the world through, "what do x people say about something?" rather than care to consume the media you want to consume without getting involved with opinions online. It's why like 9/10ths of aniYTber content is, "LIBS AND THE WOKE TRIGGERED BY NEW X EVENT" and is the most insufferable part of YouTube and Twitter as a platform.
If I had a nickel for every time this exact scenario happened, I'd be richer than Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk combined
If I had a nickel for every time this exact scenario happened, I'd be richer than Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk combined
| @RyanWiseman So you are basically saying, both sides are triggered by each other posts. And you are also triggered... by a post ? I am too dumb to understand where this chain will end. Consider me triggered enough to reply 2 lines. |
Oct 18, 2:16 PM
#8
Reply to RyanWiseman
With the amount of people that say, "these are literal drawings", may I remind the point that's even more applicable, "these are literal posts, log off and touch grass if you are that bothered". A lot you filter the world through, "what do x people say about something?" rather than care to consume the media you want to consume without getting involved with opinions online. It's why like 9/10ths of aniYTber content is, "LIBS AND THE WOKE TRIGGERED BY NEW X EVENT" and is the most insufferable part of YouTube and Twitter as a platform.
If I had a nickel for every time this exact scenario happened, I'd be richer than Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk combined
If I had a nickel for every time this exact scenario happened, I'd be richer than Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk combined
| @RyanWiseman It's not just posts, this mentality actually affects anime production. |
Oct 18, 2:17 PM
#9
Oct 18, 2:26 PM
#10
| Yes and no. On one hand it's obvious when an artists puts their sexual fantasies into a character design but on the other hand, that's not really a bad thing. |
Oct 18, 2:27 PM
#11
| I think that could be a part of it, but in real life, everybody who I've seen complain about ecchi has been a straight white man. I have never seen a woman in real life complain about ecchi. RyanWiseman said: Both sides of culture warrior tourists have this problem. If one side hates an anime online, the other will worship it for no reason except that the other side hates it. This expands into other subjects, including ones related to anime, such as localizers. None of them have any real opinions.A lot you filter the world through, "what do x people say about something?" rather than care to consume the media you want to consume without getting involved with opinions online. It's why like 9/10ths of aniYTber content is, "LIBS AND THE WOKE TRIGGERED BY NEW X EVENT" and is the most insufferable part of YouTube and Twitter as a platform. |
Oct 18, 3:34 PM
#12
| If any of these folk start talking about cancelling uma musume and other gacha to anime for these reasons then im in their camp pero~ |
Oct 18, 3:45 PM
#13
Reply to rxtxrd
| @rxtxrd So they moe-ified her to a disgusting degree in the anime compared to the manga and you are only mad about the lack of breasts??? Weird that you bring up a character that is 15 for your point and not a MILF that is 30+ for your example. I'll defend MILF and adults having fanservice to the grave, not the character that is 9000 years old but looks like she's 12 |
Oct 18, 3:51 PM
#15
Reply to RyanWiseman
@rxtxrd So they moe-ified her to a disgusting degree in the anime compared to the manga and you are only mad about the lack of breasts??? Weird that you bring up a character that is 15 for your point and not a MILF that is 30+ for your example. I'll defend MILF and adults having fanservice to the grave, not the character that is 9000 years old but looks like she's 12
| @RyanWiseman I never stated such a thing, I'm simply bringing it up because it's related to the topic in this thread |
Oct 18, 5:17 PM
#16
Reply to rxtxrd
@RyanWiseman I never stated such a thing, I'm simply bringing it up because it's related to the topic in this thread
| @rxtxrd Sure, I get that. Personally, I just wish you pulled better examples of the problem since the original author of Bocchi the Rock didn't even have a problem with this change from manga adaptation to anime, it was other people complaining about this change. Like people aren't having a problem with Holo from Spice and Wolf and Motoko from GiTS being drawn in the most sexy ways you can make a character. This criticism is often at shows where the characters are in high school: where it's the same tropes recycled because writers can and will not attempt/care to write any other trends. That is where you see these criticisms, in which they get labeled as, "You just don't like it because it isn't woke." (because imo, that is what OPs entire point was for starting this thread) |
Oct 18, 6:52 PM
#17
| To me it doesn't matter, so long as it's there! 😁 |
Oct 18, 9:19 PM
#18
| Fanservice consumers of anime feel betrayed when a female character isn't designed to be objectified. They feel betrayed that they were looking forward to cleavage, but got a war machine. Then there are men live by 1950 society who feel threatened when a woman like commands more respect, fear, and loyalty than they ever could. Even Some women feel jealous not because of beauty, but because these characters embody uncompromising clarity and power traits that society suppresses in real life... Fiy by these characters, I mean ass kicking waifu I like |
Oct 19, 2:50 AM
#19
| When you analyse the skull and bones structure of anime girls, you'll find yourself deep in horror. It looks like the consequences of generational inbreeding. |
SgtBateManOct 19, 10:09 AM
Help! I need somebody. Help! Not just anybody. Help! You know I need someone. Helpppppp! |
Oct 19, 2:50 AM
#20
| It's mostly terminally online zoomers who just live on twitter and have no actual real issues to worry about, so they make up fake issues to get outraged over. They're more prudish than boomers. |
Oct 19, 2:51 AM
#21
Reply to RyanWiseman
@rxtxrd Sure, I get that. Personally, I just wish you pulled better examples of the problem since the original author of Bocchi the Rock didn't even have a problem with this change from manga adaptation to anime, it was other people complaining about this change. Like people aren't having a problem with Holo from Spice and Wolf and Motoko from GiTS being drawn in the most sexy ways you can make a character. This criticism is often at shows where the characters are in high school: where it's the same tropes recycled because writers can and will not attempt/care to write any other trends. That is where you see these criticisms, in which they get labeled as, "You just don't like it because it isn't woke." (because imo, that is what OPs entire point was for starting this thread)
| @RyanWiseman I guess the reason I used the bad example is because the original manga panel didn't feel sexualised to begin with, so changing it makes it feel like just having a larger bust is inherently problematic, or having a certain body type automatically means you are being sexualised. I get that a lot of girls in animanga are unrealistic but I don't think this Bocchi was one of them. Women will shame other women about this not just in anime but in real life too, making us feel insecure growing up. I think the anime version of bocchi looks cute, I like the larger frills and the bow at the back of the maid outfit so I think it's an improvement, it just irks me how they made her look totally flat, as if it's such a problem. |
Oct 19, 2:57 AM
#22
Reply to rxtxrd
| @rxtxrd Wasn't the only reason she made the changes she did so her like 5 year old daughter could watch the show? Which is crazy since it's not supposed to be for kids. No matter if the creator was fine with the changes, her reason was ridiculous and she doesn't deserve to stay on as a screenwriter. |
Oct 19, 3:07 AM
#23
Reply to Toadfan64
@rxtxrd Wasn't the only reason she made the changes she did so her like 5 year old daughter could watch the show? Which is crazy since it's not supposed to be for kids.
No matter if the creator was fine with the changes, her reason was ridiculous and she doesn't deserve to stay on as a screenwriter.
No matter if the creator was fine with the changes, her reason was ridiculous and she doesn't deserve to stay on as a screenwriter.
| @Toadfan64 I agree, I despise censorship regardless of the reason, but especially when it's a dumb reason like this |
Oct 19, 3:10 AM
#24
Reply to Toadfan64
It's mostly terminally online zoomers who just live on twitter and have no actual real issues to worry about, so they make up fake issues to get outraged over. They're more prudish than boomers.
| @Toadfan64 They should have never ever been allowed to discover anime unfortunately |
Oct 19, 3:22 AM
#25
Reply to ComeInReiAsuka
@Toadfan64 They should have never ever been allowed to discover anime unfortunately
| @ComeInReiAsuka Truly the worst thing to come from Covid. If I have to see phrases like "diddy blud ahh anime" one more time on online... |
Oct 19, 3:26 AM
#26
Reply to rxtxrd
@Toadfan64 I agree, I despise censorship regardless of the reason, but especially when it's a dumb reason like this
| @rxtxrd Yep. I'm very anti censorship so shit like this pisses me off to see happen. It's WILD to see a younger generation so okay with censorship. |
Oct 19, 4:42 AM
#27
Reply to Toadfan64
@rxtxrd Wasn't the only reason she made the changes she did so her like 5 year old daughter could watch the show? Which is crazy since it's not supposed to be for kids.
No matter if the creator was fine with the changes, her reason was ridiculous and she doesn't deserve to stay on as a screenwriter.
No matter if the creator was fine with the changes, her reason was ridiculous and she doesn't deserve to stay on as a screenwriter.
| @Toadfan64 And likewise, with that standard, the bulk majority of anime can't be adapted because they alter the original author's intentions. Changes are done so non-manga fans can watch the show, which is crazy, because the source material was not meant for anime fans. Which, no matter if the creator was fine with the changes, that reason is ridiculous and those animators don't deserve to stay on as animators. If you still can't see how this logic is bad, then we could talk about how a bunch of music execs from Sony have pre-censored your J-Music listening experience, given this is your point's logical conclusion |
Oct 19, 4:50 AM
#28
Oct 19, 6:18 AM
#29
| Nah, I don't have a problem with an anime character being conventionally attractive, but I don't find unrealistic, warped proportions as attractive. I'm tired of anime girls that could compete with someone with an eating disorder for body-weight and having stick thin legs while having milkers the size of watermelons at a young age. I wish natural proportions were more popular. I'm not saying I want them to make characters not attractive, just more in line with natural proportions. So tired of anime girls only being board flat, or incredibly buxom without anything in-between. This also echoes my IRL feelings that fake breasts are way too popular rn. I think it's a shame society and media are reinforcing this idea that women need unnaturally large breasts. Or lips full of filler. Of course a woman's body is her own to make decisions with, but there are so many I wish didn't feel pressure to go under the knife of a plastic surgeon. This has nothing to do with 'insecurities' and just finding nature more attractive than fake plastic trees |
OiisuOct 19, 6:25 AM
Oct 19, 6:18 AM
#30
Reply to ForgotEyeWasHere
I think that could be a part of it, but in real life, everybody who I've seen complain about ecchi has been a straight white man. I have never seen a woman in real life complain about ecchi.
RyanWiseman said:
A lot you filter the world through, "what do x people say about something?" rather than care to consume the media you want to consume without getting involved with opinions online. It's why like 9/10ths of aniYTber content is, "LIBS AND THE WOKE TRIGGERED BY NEW X EVENT" and is the most insufferable part of YouTube and Twitter as a platform.
Both sides of culture warrior tourists have this problem. If one side hates an anime online, the other will worship it for no reason except that the other side hates it. This expands into other subjects, including ones related to anime, such as localizers. None of them have any real opinions.A lot you filter the world through, "what do x people say about something?" rather than care to consume the media you want to consume without getting involved with opinions online. It's why like 9/10ths of aniYTber content is, "LIBS AND THE WOKE TRIGGERED BY NEW X EVENT" and is the most insufferable part of YouTube and Twitter as a platform.
| @ForgotEyeWasHere That's not true, they are just basic gatekeepers. The people who don't watch anime would probably just call anime satanic and move on. |
Kimochi Warui |
Oct 19, 6:28 AM
#31
Reply to rxtxrd
@RyanWiseman I guess the reason I used the bad example is because the original manga panel didn't feel sexualised to begin with, so changing it makes it feel like just having a larger bust is inherently problematic, or having a certain body type automatically means you are being sexualised. I get that a lot of girls in animanga are unrealistic but I don't think this Bocchi was one of them. Women will shame other women about this not just in anime but in real life too, making us feel insecure growing up. I think the anime version of bocchi looks cute, I like the larger frills and the bow at the back of the maid outfit so I think it's an improvement, it just irks me how they made her look totally flat, as if it's such a problem.
| @rxtxrd I just think this conversation is better had when its about adult characters getting the criticism, because it feels like most of the criticisms from Twitter is about high school aged characters (like 90% of the time that these discussions pop out). Like Bocchi is tame compared to where my original criticism was, which was directed at the original OP on this thread who thinks Fate Kaleid is a high rated show. Imo, this is the type of problem that deserves more criticism than Bocchi The Rock ever will |
Oct 19, 6:34 AM
#32
Reply to RyanWiseman
@Toadfan64 And likewise, with that standard, the bulk majority of anime can't be adapted because they alter the original author's intentions. Changes are done so non-manga fans can watch the show, which is crazy, because the source material was not meant for anime fans. Which, no matter if the creator was fine with the changes, that reason is ridiculous and those animators don't deserve to stay on as animators. If you still can't see how this logic is bad, then we could talk about how a bunch of music execs from Sony have pre-censored your J-Music listening experience, given this is your point's logical conclusion
RyanWiseman said: if the creator was fine with the changes Where is the proof of this? Every time someone says this, they pull up old irrelevant tweets trying to paint them as recent, and disregard that with Japanese work culture mangaka won't openly complain about this stuff, they usually stay silent. I can't imagine a writer/artist being happy that their original intentions were altered to this degree. RyanWiseman said: the bulk majority of anime can't be adapted because they alter the original author's intentions. Changes are done so non-manga fans can watch the show This might be true in a pragmatic sense because the studios want to make money, that doesn't mean that any of us are going to like or agree with it, deciding to include 5-year olds as "non-manga fans" when it was never meant to be that way just seems like intentionally trying to butcher the work, not improve it. I can put up with making changes with pacing, or the ending like they did with Kakegurui because there are restrictions with limited episode count, but these are usually necessary evils. This doesn't seem like one of them. |
Oct 19, 1:57 PM
#33
Reply to RyanWiseman
@Toadfan64 And likewise, with that standard, the bulk majority of anime can't be adapted because they alter the original author's intentions. Changes are done so non-manga fans can watch the show, which is crazy, because the source material was not meant for anime fans. Which, no matter if the creator was fine with the changes, that reason is ridiculous and those animators don't deserve to stay on as animators. If you still can't see how this logic is bad, then we could talk about how a bunch of music execs from Sony have pre-censored your J-Music listening experience, given this is your point's logical conclusion
| @RyanWiseman And that's fine. If you can't adhere to what the author intends in the original work, it shouldn't be adapted. I'm sure there's plenty of anime I love (including Bocchi) that has made changes contrary to the authors wants or original work, but that doesn't make it right, or that it should be a practice continued. |
Oct 19, 5:40 PM
#34
Reply to Toadfan64
@RyanWiseman And that's fine. If you can't adhere to what the author intends in the original work, it shouldn't be adapted. I'm sure there's plenty of anime I love (including Bocchi) that has made changes contrary to the authors wants or original work, but that doesn't make it right, or that it should be a practice continued.
| @Toadfan64 So are you for this even if it continues to isolate the younger generations from caring about an entire anime genre (over its inability to have introspection) that is actually for them? Like the biggest criticism of fanservice comes from Gen Z, my generation; and we are now the primary demographic for the seinen/jousei genre since most of us are adults. It's the older generations that are having a problem with the newest generation preferences, circa, these same complains since 3600 BCE. And so many old otaku have been bashing Gen Z on their takes for anime for exactly this, calling us ツイフェミ for daring to have takes different than yours. Like if we look at a recent Ceros poll, people want more competent women characters and not just seasonal characters who only are remembered by the amount of body pillows sold. The demographic of anime consumption is getting close to a 50/50 gender divide, which means people have different expectations of the characters they watch now compared to the boys club millennials, who imo, lacked good media literacy and allowed modern anime to get so fanservice heavy. You can read more about how the newest generation prefers anime if you think what I'm saying is wrong: https://view.ceros.com/nrgmr/crunchyroll-global-state-of-anime/p/1 It's mostly terminally online zoomers who just live on twitter and have no actual real issues to worry about, so they make up fake issues to get outraged over. They're more prudish than boomers. Like you were one who opened with this entire take by basically calling us ツイフェミ, as if we aren't the primary demographic of anime consumption now. It's probably why Bocchi changed in the first place, because this fanservice appeal is very much influenced from old anime that more resonates with Millennials and those older. Like if you want good fanservice anime for us to watch, the industry needs to stop making the characters look 12 or have them be teenagers. Not only do I think it's weird as an adult, but I don't trust people who tend to make THIS their point of advocating for free speech, because you never see these defenders ever defend free speech in any other context than goon material. They'll be loud about the free market self regulating (because that is what this behavior is, just a symptom of capitalism), but never mad about the US' current GOVERNMENT censorship of free speech. It's Chibi Reviews level of outrage, backed up by femimatsu are other ネット右翼 websites that spoonfeed you these talking points |
Oct 19, 6:32 PM
#35
Reply to RyanWiseman
@Toadfan64 So are you for this even if it continues to isolate the younger generations from caring about an entire anime genre (over its inability to have introspection) that is actually for them? Like the biggest criticism of fanservice comes from Gen Z, my generation; and we are now the primary demographic for the seinen/jousei genre since most of us are adults. It's the older generations that are having a problem with the newest generation preferences, circa, these same complains since 3600 BCE.
And so many old otaku have been bashing Gen Z on their takes for anime for exactly this, calling us ツイフェミ for daring to have takes different than yours. Like if we look at a recent Ceros poll, people want more competent women characters and not just seasonal characters who only are remembered by the amount of body pillows sold. The demographic of anime consumption is getting close to a 50/50 gender divide, which means people have different expectations of the characters they watch now compared to the boys club millennials, who imo, lacked good media literacy and allowed modern anime to get so fanservice heavy. You can read more about how the newest generation prefers anime if you think what I'm saying is wrong:
https://view.ceros.com/nrgmr/crunchyroll-global-state-of-anime/p/1
Like you were one who opened with this entire take by basically calling us ツイフェミ, as if we aren't the primary demographic of anime consumption now. It's probably why Bocchi changed in the first place, because this fanservice appeal is very much influenced from old anime that more resonates with Millennials and those older. Like if you want good fanservice anime for us to watch, the industry needs to stop making the characters look 12 or have them be teenagers. Not only do I think it's weird as an adult, but I don't trust people who tend to make THIS their point of advocating for free speech, because you never see these defenders ever defend free speech in any other context than goon material. They'll be loud about the free market self regulating (because that is what this behavior is, just a symptom of capitalism), but never mad about the US' current GOVERNMENT censorship of free speech. It's Chibi Reviews level of outrage, backed up by femimatsu are other ネット右翼 websites that spoonfeed you these talking points
And so many old otaku have been bashing Gen Z on their takes for anime for exactly this, calling us ツイフェミ for daring to have takes different than yours. Like if we look at a recent Ceros poll, people want more competent women characters and not just seasonal characters who only are remembered by the amount of body pillows sold. The demographic of anime consumption is getting close to a 50/50 gender divide, which means people have different expectations of the characters they watch now compared to the boys club millennials, who imo, lacked good media literacy and allowed modern anime to get so fanservice heavy. You can read more about how the newest generation prefers anime if you think what I'm saying is wrong:
https://view.ceros.com/nrgmr/crunchyroll-global-state-of-anime/p/1
It's mostly terminally online zoomers who just live on twitter and have no actual real issues to worry about, so they make up fake issues to get outraged over. They're more prudish than boomers.
Like you were one who opened with this entire take by basically calling us ツイフェミ, as if we aren't the primary demographic of anime consumption now. It's probably why Bocchi changed in the first place, because this fanservice appeal is very much influenced from old anime that more resonates with Millennials and those older. Like if you want good fanservice anime for us to watch, the industry needs to stop making the characters look 12 or have them be teenagers. Not only do I think it's weird as an adult, but I don't trust people who tend to make THIS their point of advocating for free speech, because you never see these defenders ever defend free speech in any other context than goon material. They'll be loud about the free market self regulating (because that is what this behavior is, just a symptom of capitalism), but never mad about the US' current GOVERNMENT censorship of free speech. It's Chibi Reviews level of outrage, backed up by femimatsu are other ネット右翼 websites that spoonfeed you these talking points
RyanWiseman said: Yes. If people can't handle what's in anime, they should go watch something that they can handle. There's plenty of other stuff to watch.So are you for this even if it continues to isolate the younger generations from caring about an entire anime genre (over its inability to have introspection) that is actually for them? RyanWiseman said: I am in Gen Z, and I am strongly against censorship. It's not just the "boomers" who oppose censorship.so many old otaku have been bashing Gen Z on their takes for anime for exactly this RyanWiseman said: I for one find it odd how many people who claim to be "supportive of LGBT rights" would be so defensive of localizers. For decades, they have cut LGBT characters out of anime, like in Sailor Moon. They are also quite racist, and cut Japanese culture out of anime in order to Westernize it too.I don't trust people who tend to make THIS their point of advocating for free speech, because you never see these defenders ever defend free speech in any other context than goon material. RyanWiseman said: Lots of people are against the Texas Anime Ban, for their censorship of anime, especially lolisho, ecchi, BL/GL, and GB anime. Culture warrior tourists like Rev Says Desu praised and defended the Texas Anime Ban because they are pro-censorship, and are therefore tourists.but never mad about the US' current GOVERNMENT censorship of free speech. |
ForgotEyeWasHereOct 19, 6:49 PM
Oct 19, 9:41 PM
#36
| Realistically speaking? Yes. People with insecurities don't like attractive characters being idealised, even if it's fiction. It's not like women don't do the same (look at all the popular female centric media, or otome games) - the difference is, it's not as socially acceptable for men to complain about unrealistic expectations as it is for women. The ironic thing is, any time I've actually spoken with a guy about why he likes any given character... it's rarely about their appearance. Obviously it plays a part, but a side effect of having SO MANY attractive characters to choose from is that attraction becomes less of a reason to like any given one of them above others. Nobody actually wants to have any kind of nuanced discussion about this though - particularly because it vindicates a wider "us vs them" style argument - so it never results in a productive conversation. I anticipate the replies to this comment will not differ from that trend. |
Oct 19, 11:46 PM
#37
Reply to ForgotEyeWasHere
RyanWiseman said:
So are you for this even if it continues to isolate the younger generations from caring about an entire anime genre (over its inability to have introspection) that is actually for them?
Yes. If people can't handle what's in anime, they should go watch something that they can handle. There's plenty of other stuff to watch.So are you for this even if it continues to isolate the younger generations from caring about an entire anime genre (over its inability to have introspection) that is actually for them?
RyanWiseman said:
so many old otaku have been bashing Gen Z on their takes for anime for exactly this
I am in Gen Z, and I am strongly against censorship. It's not just the "boomers" who oppose censorship.so many old otaku have been bashing Gen Z on their takes for anime for exactly this
RyanWiseman said:
I don't trust people who tend to make THIS their point of advocating for free speech, because you never see these defenders ever defend free speech in any other context than goon material.
I for one find it odd how many people who claim to be "supportive of LGBT rights" would be so defensive of localizers. For decades, they have cut LGBT characters out of anime, like in Sailor Moon. They are also quite racist, and cut Japanese culture out of anime in order to Westernize it too.I don't trust people who tend to make THIS their point of advocating for free speech, because you never see these defenders ever defend free speech in any other context than goon material.
RyanWiseman said:
but never mad about the US' current GOVERNMENT censorship of free speech.
Lots of people are against the Texas Anime Ban, for their censorship of anime, especially lolisho, ecchi, BL/GL, and GB anime. Culture warrior tourists like Rev Says Desu praised and defended the Texas Anime Ban because they are pro-censorship, and are therefore tourists.but never mad about the US' current GOVERNMENT censorship of free speech.
| @ForgotEyeWasHere Anime has self-regulated the way it adapts manga for years, that's how the industry has operated; it takes certain liberties separate from the manga. This isn't the first nor the last time that we will continue to have this ongoing conversation with regards to manga adaptations. There have been many examples of changes to manga, it just seems like the only time where this becomes an outrage level of topic about adaptations when it's strictly about boobs. Like you hardly ever see this criticism directed at original Bleach to any substantial extent, which tones down its violence in the anime from the manga. Like these changes just happen often enough, that there's a reason why people will get into the manga of their favorite series because anime can drift from how the original story is told. Obv, it is a bad idea anytime the state gets involved in anything; but most sane people I see pointing these things are are doing it for media criticism, not that it needs to be banned by the government. ForgotEyeWasHere said: Lots of people are against the Texas Anime Ban, for their censorship of anime, especially lolisho, ecchi, BL/GL, and GB anime. Culture warrior tourists like Rev Says Desu praised and defended the Texas Anime Ban because they are pro-censorship, and are therefore tourists. This gets at my point about how people cannot just stop focusing on anime censorship and that is how it exclusively informs their takes. There's like a good number of states that have banned porn, including Texas; and your first thing is to think of only issues of free speech when it concerns anime being regulated by the state, but ignore the outlaw of more speech prior? Texas makes it a felony to be trans too (the lone star on their state is a review out of 5). A more blatant example is US government believing you are a literal terrorist for holding non-traditionalist viewpoints, like the first thing that should be the go-to response about the freedom of speech being ended in the US. These are fundamentally different problems, and greater limits to free speech, than an anime company self-regulating and the market responded. When I say that anime will self-regulate, studios will make a version for broadcast, a version for BD (so they can get those sales in the process of working in a censored system). This impacts then how anime gets made altogether given there's a literal production committee system and each studio will have its own internal process of handling these things. It's not like all of a sudden, you even get truly uncensored anime from a production pipeline perspective. A title like Bocchi is just another example of people seeing how the bread's made and not liking the Subway method. Imo, it just feels like there is this lack of media literacy with regards to the production of anime that makes having this conversation tough; because it's like talking to a wall often. Like anime was once at an awful spot with regards to how it self-regulates, that if this is the standard of what's a problem; anime is at one of its best spots in the current year. Like atm, I feel like the concern with free speech should prioritize the type of stuff that is most pressing. An industry regulating itself in the hopes of maximizing profits is far from my concerns. |
Oct 20, 4:57 AM
#38
Reply to RyanWiseman
@Toadfan64 So are you for this even if it continues to isolate the younger generations from caring about an entire anime genre (over its inability to have introspection) that is actually for them? Like the biggest criticism of fanservice comes from Gen Z, my generation; and we are now the primary demographic for the seinen/jousei genre since most of us are adults. It's the older generations that are having a problem with the newest generation preferences, circa, these same complains since 3600 BCE.
And so many old otaku have been bashing Gen Z on their takes for anime for exactly this, calling us ツイフェミ for daring to have takes different than yours. Like if we look at a recent Ceros poll, people want more competent women characters and not just seasonal characters who only are remembered by the amount of body pillows sold. The demographic of anime consumption is getting close to a 50/50 gender divide, which means people have different expectations of the characters they watch now compared to the boys club millennials, who imo, lacked good media literacy and allowed modern anime to get so fanservice heavy. You can read more about how the newest generation prefers anime if you think what I'm saying is wrong:
https://view.ceros.com/nrgmr/crunchyroll-global-state-of-anime/p/1
Like you were one who opened with this entire take by basically calling us ツイフェミ, as if we aren't the primary demographic of anime consumption now. It's probably why Bocchi changed in the first place, because this fanservice appeal is very much influenced from old anime that more resonates with Millennials and those older. Like if you want good fanservice anime for us to watch, the industry needs to stop making the characters look 12 or have them be teenagers. Not only do I think it's weird as an adult, but I don't trust people who tend to make THIS their point of advocating for free speech, because you never see these defenders ever defend free speech in any other context than goon material. They'll be loud about the free market self regulating (because that is what this behavior is, just a symptom of capitalism), but never mad about the US' current GOVERNMENT censorship of free speech. It's Chibi Reviews level of outrage, backed up by femimatsu are other ネット右翼 websites that spoonfeed you these talking points
And so many old otaku have been bashing Gen Z on their takes for anime for exactly this, calling us ツイフェミ for daring to have takes different than yours. Like if we look at a recent Ceros poll, people want more competent women characters and not just seasonal characters who only are remembered by the amount of body pillows sold. The demographic of anime consumption is getting close to a 50/50 gender divide, which means people have different expectations of the characters they watch now compared to the boys club millennials, who imo, lacked good media literacy and allowed modern anime to get so fanservice heavy. You can read more about how the newest generation prefers anime if you think what I'm saying is wrong:
https://view.ceros.com/nrgmr/crunchyroll-global-state-of-anime/p/1
It's mostly terminally online zoomers who just live on twitter and have no actual real issues to worry about, so they make up fake issues to get outraged over. They're more prudish than boomers.
Like you were one who opened with this entire take by basically calling us ツイフェミ, as if we aren't the primary demographic of anime consumption now. It's probably why Bocchi changed in the first place, because this fanservice appeal is very much influenced from old anime that more resonates with Millennials and those older. Like if you want good fanservice anime for us to watch, the industry needs to stop making the characters look 12 or have them be teenagers. Not only do I think it's weird as an adult, but I don't trust people who tend to make THIS their point of advocating for free speech, because you never see these defenders ever defend free speech in any other context than goon material. They'll be loud about the free market self regulating (because that is what this behavior is, just a symptom of capitalism), but never mad about the US' current GOVERNMENT censorship of free speech. It's Chibi Reviews level of outrage, backed up by femimatsu are other ネット右翼 websites that spoonfeed you these talking points
| @RyanWiseman If younger generations want to come in and change and sanitize how anime is, then I will absolutely prefer to isolate them. I would rather anime die out than become something that caters to folks who have no interest in the medium except stuff like hype moments and aura or cry about loli and fanservice. If loli anime bothers you don't watch. If fanservice bothers you, don't watch anime with it. Don't watch what makes you uncomfortable, or you don't like. I don't like yaoi, but I'm not gonna advocate to get rid of it, or change what yaoi lovers like. Also, one can agree with points Chibi might make while also thinking any kind of censorship on free speech is no good. I see the nutjobs that harass him on twitter and they're no better than the other side of the coin that they cry about. |
Oct 20, 5:58 AM
#39
Dragevard said: I’ve been noticing a pattern, especially on X. Every time an anime girl design drops, there’s always a wave of people calling it “problematic” or “sexist.” But honestly, I can’t help but feel like a lot of it comes from insecurity. Anime girls are literally drawings, yet people get so upset because they’re too “unrealistic” or “overly sexualized.” Maybe the real issue is that these characters are drawn to be attractive in a way that makes some people feel insecure or jealous because, let’s be real, they look hotter than most real people ever could. Waiting for the day sometime in the distant future when fashion trends go fucking over the top again. Like hypothetically, shit will become suddenly socially acceptable for guys to walk around wearing nothing but a tiny speedo in public like they’re just normal pants. Women rocking just their bras and panties as their main outfits because it's hip, and hairstyles so out of this world they make punk rock look like something a grandpa would swag out in for a formal event. lol At the very least, as more of a balanced approach, have the 60s micro-skirt come back in style that barely covers a woman's crotch, and maybe retire the underwear that’s basically just a piece of string jammed up their butthole. lol |
Oct 20, 6:32 AM
#40
| It's mostly people who are starting out anime and they say that because they haven't normalised this shit for themselves through constant exposure and being in circles that do. |
Oct 20, 9:08 AM
#41
| On this episode of "Annoying MAL Users" we see Dragevard, who just rushed to the forums to rant about posts on Twitter they didn't like. |
Oct 20, 2:17 PM
#42
Reply to Toadfan64
@RyanWiseman If younger generations want to come in and change and sanitize how anime is, then I will absolutely prefer to isolate them. I would rather anime die out than become something that caters to folks who have no interest in the medium except stuff like hype moments and aura or cry about loli and fanservice.
If loli anime bothers you don't watch. If fanservice bothers you, don't watch anime with it. Don't watch what makes you uncomfortable, or you don't like. I don't like yaoi, but I'm not gonna advocate to get rid of it, or change what yaoi lovers like.
Also, one can agree with points Chibi might make while also thinking any kind of censorship on free speech is no good. I see the nutjobs that harass him on twitter and they're no better than the other side of the coin that they cry about.
If loli anime bothers you don't watch. If fanservice bothers you, don't watch anime with it. Don't watch what makes you uncomfortable, or you don't like. I don't like yaoi, but I'm not gonna advocate to get rid of it, or change what yaoi lovers like.
Also, one can agree with points Chibi might make while also thinking any kind of censorship on free speech is no good. I see the nutjobs that harass him on twitter and they're no better than the other side of the coin that they cry about.
| @Toadfan64 Ofc the thing is to not watch that stuff. And when you do, there's only a handful of titles that don't do that stuff, compared to the golden age of anime, where questionable fanservice existed but was balanced amongst the rest of other good titles. There are so many titles that pander to this where the theme isn't fitting; as I would care less about it if it stuck in its own lane. Like anime has now reached the point of being like western TV/movies, where all of it is a cashgrab designed to be wish-fulfillment; hence the rise of incessant fanservice amongst like 4/5ths of each season when it doesn't even fit well with the genre. It's like one of my biggest gripes with Marvel's attempt at humor. Humor in Deadpool and original Guardians of The Galaxy works very well, the humor in Infinity War and End Game just falls very flat. And I feel like anime is currently in this same situation in not doing a good job of balancing this |
Oct 20, 2:37 PM
#43
| This is an entirely disingenuous perspective on the analysis being undertook here. People's complaints of problematic anime girl designs source from the objectively objectifying nature of the Moe phenomenon and the intentional marketability of anime girls, which commodity the aesthetics and presentations of women and girls (often very young girls) for sexualized consumption by nerdy men. To disparage the arguments as "jealousy" is both laughable and anti-intellectual. This is not to say you can't enjoy these female characters, but that there are valid and interesting criticisms to be made of otaku culture's presentation of women and girls. |
Oct 20, 7:03 PM
#44
| Probably because they aren't jealous, but those designs are indeed "unrealistic" and "overly sexualized". Well, personally I think your first mistake is to taking twitter's users opinion seriously. |
Oct 20, 7:37 PM
#45
Reply to RyanWiseman
@Toadfan64 Ofc the thing is to not watch that stuff. And when you do, there's only a handful of titles that don't do that stuff, compared to the golden age of anime, where questionable fanservice existed but was balanced amongst the rest of other good titles. There are so many titles that pander to this where the theme isn't fitting; as I would care less about it if it stuck in its own lane. Like anime has now reached the point of being like western TV/movies, where all of it is a cashgrab designed to be wish-fulfillment; hence the rise of incessant fanservice amongst like 4/5ths of each season when it doesn't even fit well with the genre. It's like one of my biggest gripes with Marvel's attempt at humor. Humor in Deadpool and original Guardians of The Galaxy works very well, the humor in Infinity War and End Game just falls very flat. And I feel like anime is currently in this same situation in not doing a good job of balancing this
| @RyanWiseman What fanservice are you even talking about? I assume we must be talking about different things. |
| If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 20, 7:40 PM
#46
| No, it's just the lack of actually good characters while the anime makers continue to push overly busty women which I am honestly tired to watch, because you bet most of the time their whole schtick is to strike a pose flaunting their "assets". |
-Tohka is better than Kurumi. You can't change my mind. |
Oct 20, 8:42 PM
#47
Reply to LostSpectre
@RyanWiseman What fanservice are you even talking about? I assume we must be talking about different things.
| @LostSpectre The most common points of fanservice is the running trope of the character that accidentally plants his hand or face into a pile of boobage, awkward sexual situations (MC walking into a shower/locker-room/bedroom where the character is changing), a characters panties getting exposed for the sake of trying to embarrass the character, weird relationships when its not a harem anime, dressing up characters in more fetish-ey style outfits. All these often are done when it's very out of place. Good example is SAO, which A-1 pictures plays up this idea of a harem and harem-baits the viewers. Another good example from that is where they have 12 year old Silica momentarily abducted by a tentacle monster, where they do some sexually suggestive shots during that sequence. Most of the fanservice I see in modern anime end up doing the bad approach; where anime that take place in high school are the primary offenders. This is the type of stuff where you see the complaints on Twitter when people complain about things being sexist and problematic. A good example of fanservice I do not mind is Motoko from GiTS, where they tastefully do scenes of her in more revealing outfits and full nudity. But then again, I tend to not have a problem with that given that she looks to be near 30 years old, and it isn't used as some cheap gag for the sake of not delivering on the story. In Spice and Wolf, the naked wolf goddess bit works well. Since she's drawn to look like an actual adult and her naked body isn't used as a gag, it's not something that feels out of place in terms of the story and physical look of the character. So yeah, to reiterate, the fanservice I am referring to is a type of cop out that cheapens the medium. Hopefully that makes sense??? |
RyanWisemanOct 20, 8:45 PM
Oct 20, 8:51 PM
#48
| meawhile, some of my favorites include overpowered japanese guys while Im 0% east asian |
| :v |
Oct 21, 5:37 AM
#49
| I really don't understand this too be honest. I mean the caption makes sense in way but the whole idea that a "hot anime girl" makes insecure "ugly" people project their insecurities onto them doesn't make sense. It's an extremely valid take that anime girls in this day and age are oversexualized and when you aren't blinded by your hormones drawn to their attractive features seeing sexualized characters a ton on your feed gets old quick. And these characters aren't sexualized to make people feel insecure, it's purely for likes or better yet, they have a patron in their Bio so they can earn money off of their sexualized drawings of anime girls. And as for them looking "hotter" (lets just define that as seeming more attractive) than most real people, suit yourself. If you're in love with someone they are much more attractive than any anime girl ever could be (partially coping with that statement) |
Oct 21, 3:09 PM
#50
| I mean a lot of anime has so much fanservice (especially popular ones, stuff like popular gifs people use etc.) so Im not surprised people that dont watch anime think that. And to be fair, statistically speaking, most bodies - by this I mean boobs lol - in Eastern Asian countries tend to be on the smaller size, so yeah, if were taking inspiration from that, the characters are indeed unrealistc. Of course, some people are exceptions. But yeah, people on Twitter tend to have..... opinions.... tho it is widely known that people post interesting takes to get engegement on there. My take on this is that, yeah, this is an animated cartoon, so the characters are not gonna look realistic. The "average" anime style isn't even realistic, its cartoonified, despite it looking more realistic that western cartoons with their bean mouths, sometimes abstract body shapes (the whole shape theory n allat) and very off proportions. But, to say that a good portion of anime women arent overly sexsualised would be completely ridiculous. The "average person" dislikes and makes fun of the "target demographic" and the whole otaku culture for a reason. I dont think I need to give examples. I seriously dont think that most of these women that hate on these designs are jelaous (I mean, its possbile but I gravely doubt its the majority) or whatever, despite the situation with their own attributes. Hell, I am a woman, I have bigger boobs and ass than most women I know and I am still not a fan of thoes designs. I dont think it adds anything valuable to the design - unless its designed with the purpose of making someone horny, which, in many cases, is true. What I mean to say is that it would be absolutely silly to not understand where other people that dislike thoes designs are coming from. Even tho I am not a fan of a lot of these designs at all nor am I attracted to them, that doesn't mean that other people arent allowed to be. |
More topics from this board
» Anime that was never fully adapted but you wish had continued?Vic270 - Today |
30 |
by Sheol01
»»
21 seconds ago |
|
» Anime Booty and Booby contest! V2IpreferEcchi - 7 hours ago |
13 |
by Sheol01
»»
3 minutes ago |
|
Sticky: » AWC 2025 Anime Watching Challenge - Sign-Up (Open Until December 10th) ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )AWC_mod - Jan 1 |
929 |
by BigMoistPhrogg
»»
3 minutes ago |
|
» Decline of Avant-Garde Anime ?tchitchouan - 10 hours ago |
11 |
by Spunkert
»»
9 minutes ago |
|
» anime cutscenes or openings in gamesLittleStar - 42 minutes ago |
4 |
by rohan121
»»
16 minutes ago |
