Shikimori's Not Just a Cutie
Available on Manga Store
New
May 16, 2022 12:50 AM
#101
DankWeeb said: I am currently on episode 3. From the beginning i didn't like izumi. His lack of masculine traits and his overall loser mentality around his bad luck. It felt kinda hypocritical when i repeated this phrase inside my mind so i overlooked this fact and decided to continue watching it anyways. And maybe now i have realized the reason i hate him. The way they keep using him in the first two episodes. Dude is nothing more than a punching bag and a tool for glorifying shikomori's badass behavior. The anime constantly tries to put him down while glorifying shikomori. It feels really forced. Of course he has his own redeemable qualities but he never got the stage he deserved. He feels more like a side character. Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Welp, this is the last time i'll ever post my opinion on myanimelist forum |
May 16, 2022 1:29 AM
#102
| Are guys ohk!? it's slice of it is going to be like this, personally I'm fine with this anime . |
May 16, 2022 6:31 AM
#103
LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: It makes zero difference to the trope itself, which is the entire point, not which one is more of a damsel than the other, my guy. LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: You're way too hung up on this inconsequential difference, they're both damsel in distress tropes, whether one occurs more frequently or not.LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: That's literally not how it works, she was a damsel in distress in that particular instance, and to the threat of sexual assault no less. If anything, it could easily be argued that her being a perfectly capable fighter makes the trope more egregious, it is not in any way limited to completely helpless females, it's not like Asuna couldn't handle herself, either. EdgyLord666 said: SkyhighCFC said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: DankWeeb said: I am currently on episode 3. From the beginning i didn't like izumi. His lack of masculine traits and his overall loser mentality around his bad luck. It felt kinda hypocritical when i repeated this phrase inside my mind so i overlooked this fact and decided to continue watching it anyways. And maybe now i have realized the reason i hate him. The way they keep using him in the first two episodes. Dude is nothing more than a punching bag and a tool for glorifying shikomori's badass behavior. The anime constantly tries to put him down while glorifying shikomori. It feels really forced. Of course he has his own redeemable qualities but he never got the stage he deserved. He feels more like a side character. Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Anime is full of strong women in meaningful relationships. What it hasn't had much of in a while is the female equivalent of Izumi, the "damsel in distress" type. That's one of the tedious things about this show, it's reversing a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned, so what point is it making and who even cares. On top of that, the romance is flat and the comedy is non existent. disclaimer: all these observations as at episode three, after which I hard dropped this. Said someone with skeleton knight in their favorite. First off, you have no idea why I have skeleton knight favourited. I'm sure you think you made a barbed point there, once you try to explain it you'll probably realise how lame it was. If you can't explain your point then I'll do it for you. do it mate, obviously I have no idea why, I just thought you're quite blind for saying "a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned" while literally watching white knight saving chicks here & there. Okay, so the point you were trying to make is that me enjoying a show that literally features a knight who saves people as its central premise somehow negates me being able to criticise this show Here's what you focused on What it hasn't had much of in a while is the "damsel in distress" type. Here's what I actually wrote Anime is full of strong women in meaningful relationships. What it hasn't had much of in a while is the female equivalent of Izumi, the "damsel in distress" type. That's one of the tedious things about this show, it's reversing a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned, so what point is it making and who even cares. You see, I'm talking about the relationship you just dived in with some shit about side characters in a fantasy show I'll take watching a skeleton knight saving innocent victims of crime over this tedious and repetitive damsel in distress fest any day. and? Those "innocent victims" are literally damsel in distress. The difference is the fact that they are literally side characters. The main female in that show is certainly not some damsel in distress. Well thx for supporting my point, although I disagree with the main female stupid enough to think kidnappers would fight fair & square, proceed to cried & almost got raped till the white knight save her is "certainly not some damsel in distress". One single instance where there was a hostage situation does not make her a damsel in distress type character. The only reason she was in that position was because there was a hostage. She would easily merk every single one of them under normal circumstances. Izumi on the other hand is a damsel in distress in most situations in the show and can't do anything about it. The 2 are not the same at all. There is a big big difference between being put into a "damsel in distress situation" and full on BEING a damsel in distress type character. In the former, the character would under normal circumstances be able to get out of that situation, but due to some circumstance, they can't...OR they are simply in an unfair situation (like a 3 v 1 against people of similar strength). The latter described characters who are in constant need of being saved pretty much regardless of the situation. The girl from Skeleton Knight doesn't constantly need to be saved, and is thus not a damsel in distress type character. The fact that one is almost constant and the other was a one off is a pretty big difference my guy. But it does make a difference though. The other guy was basically calling someone a hypocrite for liking Skeleton knight but disliking Shikimori because there's a damsel in distress type character, despite the fact they're 2 completely different types of shows and none of the main characters in Skeleton Knight are constant damsels in distress. Not comparable. |
May 16, 2022 6:54 AM
#104
| Honestly thought this show was going to get high ratings ngl. I read the manga beforehand and it was great though I had to drop it not because of izumi but because I wish this was yuri instead and shikimori is way too hot and cool and I couldn't bear to see anymore of her. I understand the points you all have shared though he can appear pretty helpless and constantly needs to be rescued and from what I recalled in the manga the first 20 short pages chapters is about her rescuing izumi and some backstory of how their relationship came about which is quite cute. I guess this story(at least for the first half) focus is about the cool and badass female lead and... perhaps some dig it since it's a pretty adorable and wholesome trope. May need to give it some time before their relationship shines more(in terms of backstory rather than plain old badass girl rescue helpless guy situation) DankWeeb said: Welp, this is the last time i'll ever post my opinion on myanimelist forum LOL don't be at least it brought up what more people feel about the anime (character). Some people need info like this to decide whether this is worth watching... even if some points are pretty antagonising |
kobai_ringsMay 16, 2022 6:58 AM
May 16, 2022 7:29 AM
#105
May 16, 2022 10:08 AM
#106
DankWeeb said: I am currently on episode 3. From the beginning i didn't like izumi. His lack of masculine traits and his overall loser mentality around his bad luck. It felt kinda hypocritical when i repeated this phrase inside my mind so i overlooked this fact and decided to continue watching it anyways. And maybe now i have realized the reason i hate him. The way they keep using him in the first two episodes. Dude is nothing more than a punching bag and a tool for glorifying shikomori's badass behavior. The anime constantly tries to put him down while glorifying shikomori. It feels really forced. Of course he has his own redeemable qualities but he never got the stage he deserved. He feels more like a side character. Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? This is one of those gimmick shows, just like one punch man or nagatoro. I personally don’t understand how you can say he’s a loser when the dude literally jumps into a river to save a little girl, or when he carries Shikimori in his back all the way to the spot where they wanted to watch fireworks, but whatever. If you don’t like the gimmick then you don’t like the gimmick. PS: and for the record there is nothing wrong with a male character not being “masculine” every high school boy in anime doesn’t need to act like Joe Rogan on steroids all the time. |
May 16, 2022 4:03 PM
#107
| I think the main problem with the show is they took way too long for Izumi to be likeable. This contributes to what you are describing, which is that he was basically a tool to show off how cool Shikimori is. That was one of my initial impression about this character as well. But it turns out, they are actually able to character him better. It's just too damn late! Izumi in ep 6 and 7 were much much better, because they finally have him do something that actually proves to the audience that he is a very caring person, and the reason why Shikimori likes him. Him being not macho is really the red herring of why people find this show bad. It's not that all. It's just that early on, he was basically a child getting protected by his mom, and it's gonna be a very hard sell to tell people they are in a relationship if that's how the dynamic between the two felt. |
May 16, 2022 8:36 PM
#108
gintokisbicep said: did you not read the description of the show. it literally tells you in the first five minutes it is about izumi, a guy with bad luck and his badass gf who saves him. its giving you what its saying. why are you complaining. its a slice of life school romance show?? like what else are you expecting. "lack of masculine traits:. that's right i forgot the volleyball tournament is supposed to have the phantom troupe rise from the ground and have izumi opens the nine tail gate. you guys are just boring. Spotted the clown who can't accept even simple criticism of a show they like. |
May 16, 2022 10:55 PM
#109
| Read through the manga, by chapter 145, or even 144, after they walked past a physically intimate couple, and Shikimori yearned for some more physical touch from him (not just holding hands ffs); as she reached out to touch his hand, he withdraws and goes home. W. T. F. There really is some weird cognitive bias towards Izumi in the manga, but in reality, the manga really, really isnt just any better. Those panels are so painful to read, abandoned like that, then she ruminates it, to then ventilate to Nekozaki and Hachimitsu. |
thehornedratMay 16, 2022 11:07 PM
May 17, 2022 1:16 AM
#110
| Now we know what the damsel in distress storyline feels like when genderflipped. |
May 17, 2022 3:38 AM
#111
thehornedrat said: So, you're up to date with the manga, and yet you don't seem to understand how to read it, which is baffling to me. This is not a realistic series, their relationship is purely cute/wholesome on an elementary school level, and so far there's no sign of that changing. What you apparently failed to take away from that chapter is that Shikimori is just as immature, the joke is that she completely forgets her earlier woes after getting in a good tease on Izumi, and making him blush. Read through the manga, by chapter 145, or even 144, after they walked past a physically intimate couple, and Shikimori yearned for some more physical touch from him (not just holding hands ffs); as she reached out to touch his hand, he withdraws and goes home. W. T. F. There really is some weird cognitive bias towards Izumi in the manga, but in reality, the manga really, really isnt just any better. Those panels are so painful to read, abandoned like that, then she ruminates it, to then ventilate to Nekozaki and Hachimitsu. That's also part of the joke when they panic after seeing a couple that is in love and demonstrating affection, because these two act like sex doesn't exist. |
| If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
May 17, 2022 9:53 AM
#112
kfsilver89 said: DankWeeb said: I am currently on episode 3. From the beginning i didn't like izumi. His lack of masculine traits and his overall loser mentality around his bad luck. It felt kinda hypocritical when i repeated this phrase inside my mind so i overlooked this fact and decided to continue watching it anyways. And maybe now i have realized the reason i hate him. The way they keep using him in the first two episodes. Dude is nothing more than a punching bag and a tool for glorifying shikomori's badass behavior. The anime constantly tries to put him down while glorifying shikomori. It feels really forced. Of course he has his own redeemable qualities but he never got the stage he deserved. He feels more like a side character. Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? The whole toxic masculinity thing is hardly ever explored in anime. Women in popular animes always showed some form of dominance in their relationship even when the man is a bad ass. I said this before and I say it again, the problem with this series is the lack of clarification of their targeted demographic. Because I feel the large majority that watch this series will feel more comfortable if Izumi was a woman. There I said it, Izumi should be a girl and this should be a Yuri series. No, yuri just makes things worse. Even as a guy I’d rather it be 2 boys than girls. Or, you know, the best option where Izumi wasn’t as annoyingly useless as he is |
May 17, 2022 9:54 AM
#113
Caraculiambro said: Now we know what the damsel in distress storyline feels like when genderflipped. Like SAO s1 part 2 if Kirito was captured instead? |
May 18, 2022 4:45 AM
#114
gintokisbicep said: SkyhighCFC said: gintokisbicep said: did you not read the description of the show. it literally tells you in the first five minutes it is about izumi, a guy with bad luck and his badass gf who saves him. its giving you what its saying. why are you complaining. its a slice of life school romance show?? like what else are you expecting. "lack of masculine traits:. that's right i forgot the volleyball tournament is supposed to have the phantom troupe rise from the ground and have izumi opens the nine tail gate. you guys are just boring. Spotted the clown who can't accept even simple criticism of a show t hey like. who says i even like it. what im saying is literally facts, im not giving any opinion at all. all im saying is the description of the show lmao I don't know what you're talking about cuz the description reads:- "Shikimori seems like the perfect girlfriend: cute, fun to be around, sweet when she wants to be... but she has a cool dark side that comes out under the right circumstances. And her boyfriend Izumi loves to be around when that happens!" This never mentions and doesn't even come close to implying:- "a guy with bad luck and his badass gf who saves him" like you said |
cybergamer_May 18, 2022 7:09 AM
May 18, 2022 5:36 AM
#115
| Do people actually dislike this show because the male lead is weak lol that's just sad not every guy irl is a buff body builder it's a freaking anime for God's sake if you hate the show drop it it seems like people are hating it just to follow everyone else BTW Izumi is a hunk and husband material (the anime should have been a yaoi) |
May 18, 2022 9:26 AM
#116
gintokisbicep said: SkyhighCFC said: gintokisbicep said: did you not read the description of the show. it literally tells you in the first five minutes it is about izumi, a guy with bad luck and his badass gf who saves him. its giving you what its saying. why are you complaining. its a slice of life school romance show?? like what else are you expecting. "lack of masculine traits:. that's right i forgot the volleyball tournament is supposed to have the phantom troupe rise from the ground and have izumi opens the nine tail gate. you guys are just boring. Spotted the clown who can't accept even simple criticism of a show they like. who says i even like it. what im saying is literally facts, im not giving any opinion at all. all im saying is the description of the show lmao OP says his opinion and you get super mad and go into full copium mode when confronted with simple criticism. Forgive me for assuming you like the show💀💀 P.S. no where in the description does it say that the main character would be put down to look more pathetic just so his girlfriend could look cooler. That is an extremely valid criticism of the first 2 episodes. |
May 18, 2022 9:27 AM
#117
gintokisbicep said: Kene_M said: gintokisbicep said: SkyhighCFC said: gintokisbicep said: did you not read the description of the show. it literally tells you in the first five minutes it is about izumi, a guy with bad luck and his badass gf who saves him. its giving you what its saying. why are you complaining. its a slice of life school romance show?? like what else are you expecting. "lack of masculine traits:. that's right i forgot the volleyball tournament is supposed to have the phantom troupe rise from the ground and have izumi opens the nine tail gate. you guys are just boring. Spotted the clown who can't accept even simple criticism of a show t hey like. who says i even like it. what im saying is literally facts, im not giving any opinion at all. all im saying is the description of the show lmao I don't know what you're talking about cuz the description reads:- "Shikimori seems like the perfect girlfriend: cute, fun to be around, sweet when she wants to be... but she has a cool dark side that comes out under the right circumstances. And her boyfriend Izumi loves to be around when that happens!" This never mentions and doesn't even come close to implying:- "a guy with bad luck and his badass gf who saves him" like you said did you also not watch the first five minutes of the show. it literally sets out the entire plot. Yea and people can criticize that plot man...idk what part of this you're not getting. |
May 18, 2022 2:39 PM
#118
| After finding out what a bolo tie is, looks like another the message trait added there by the PC scum that is NBCUniversal, to exemplify her masculinity. Lol, to think I thought its supposed to look feminine. Anyway, thus with myself revealing to be not from America...('wtf is that necklace?' lol)....I'm super keen on acquiring a similar orange jade one myself as jewelry. |
May 18, 2022 3:11 PM
#119
gintokisbicep said: SkyhighCFC said: gintokisbicep said: SkyhighCFC said: gintokisbicep said: did you not read the description of the show. it literally tells you in the first five minutes it is about izumi, a guy with bad luck and his badass gf who saves him. its giving you what its saying. why are you complaining. its a slice of life school romance show?? like what else are you expecting. "lack of masculine traits:. that's right i forgot the volleyball tournament is supposed to have the phantom troupe rise from the ground and have izumi opens the nine tail gate. you guys are just boring. Spotted the clown who can't accept even simple criticism of a show they like. who says i even like it. what im saying is literally facts, im not giving any opinion at all. all im saying is the description of the show lmao OP says his opinion and you get super mad and go into full copium mode when confronted with simple criticism. Forgive me for assuming you like the show💀💀 P.S. no where in the description does it say that the main character would be put down to look more pathetic just so his girlfriend could look cooler. That is an extremely valid criticism of the first 2 episodes. how is the main character more pathetic mans just got bad luck. also yeah people can critique the plot but this isnt criticism its just being straight up autistic and not understanding a very basic plot. you dont like it. fine. but dont get mad when you continue to watch something that spells everything out from the first episode. ORRRRR...you can fuck off and let people have whatever opinions they like? If someone doesn't like a plot point or particularly trope they can speak out about it? How is Izumi pathetic you ask? Look no further than the football scene. That was mostly anime original and it made him look like such an autistic moron. There are plenty of valid reasons to critique this show. Get off the copium. |
May 18, 2022 4:12 PM
#120
thehornedrat said: After finding out what a bolo tie is, looks like another the message trait added there by the PC scum that is NBCUniversal, to exemplify her masculinity. Lol, to think I thought its supposed to look feminine. Anyway, thus with myself revealing to be not from America...('wtf is that necklace?' lol)....I'm super keen on acquiring a similar orange jade one myself as jewelry. What in the actual fuck are you talking about? |
May 18, 2022 6:11 PM
#121
| I'm only passing by here, so feel free to ignore me as I pose a vital aspect in storytelling... "Is it possible to write a character that feels human?" It's not necessarily an order of dominance between characters' dynamics regardless of their genders and whatnot, but rather a general feeling that a certain character is a human being. Or in other word, "relatable". Izumi is just pathetic. Not Kazuya level of pathetic, but I couldn't bother with his existence at all, whether as a fictional character or a human. |
May 18, 2022 7:18 PM
#122
| When one of the more positive aspects of izumi's character is that he's able to cut vegetables without hurting himself (due to his bad luck) it's hard to not understand why he's unlikable. He's a protagonist, he's half the relationship he should be one of the reasons why we cheer on this couple and want to watch them. But when something so banal is a reason why people compliment his personality it's a chore to get through his screen time. |
May 18, 2022 9:08 PM
#123
| one the main problems I have with Izumi is not entirely based on how unmasculine he is. The main issue I have with the anime is the fact that he's just there to show off shikimori, I know that's the whole premise of the show but it feels like they're completely overlooking izumi as a character and the fact that the only remarkable thing about him is his bad luck but even that trait gets overused doesn't make him any better as a character. I can only hope he gets some sort of development and not every episode be a constant show of the cute and cool shikimori. I believe in izumi supremacy more than shokimori lol |
May 19, 2022 5:42 PM
#124
Binex13 said: You're supposed to compliment that he's a good cook, not that he can cut a vegetable without losing a finger, the whole luck stuff is not supposed to be a serious part of his character, expect in moments where it concerns his actual character development, but I can understand being confused by the anime, because they run the back luck stuff into the fucking ground. He also comes across more unlikable in general in the anime, between the VA and poor directing.When one of the more positive aspects of izumi's character is that he's able to cut vegetables without hurting himself (due to his bad luck) it's hard to not understand why he's unlikable. He's a protagonist, he's half the relationship he should be one of the reasons why we cheer on this couple and want to watch them. But when something so banal is a reason why people compliment his personality it's a chore to get through his screen time. |
| If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
May 19, 2022 5:44 PM
#125
Ice-Cube said: You're supposed to view Izumi on the same level of cuteness as Shikimori, at least that's crystal clear in the manga, not so much in the anime.one the main problems I have with Izumi is not entirely based on how unmasculine he is. The main issue I have with the anime is the fact that he's just there to show off shikimori, I know that's the whole premise of the show but it feels like they're completely overlooking izumi as a character and the fact that the only remarkable thing about him is his bad luck but even that trait gets overused doesn't make him any better as a character. I can only hope he gets some sort of development and not every episode be a constant show of the cute and cool shikimori. I believe in izumi supremacy more than shokimori lol |
| If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
May 20, 2022 1:21 PM
#126
gintokisbicep said: SkyhighCFC said: gintokisbicep said: SkyhighCFC said: gintokisbicep said: SkyhighCFC said: gintokisbicep said: did you not read the description of the show. it literally tells you in the first five minutes it is about izumi, a guy with bad luck and his badass gf who saves him. its giving you what its saying. why are you complaining. its a slice of life school romance show?? like what else are you expecting. "lack of masculine traits:. that's right i forgot the volleyball tournament is supposed to have the phantom troupe rise from the ground and have izumi opens the nine tail gate. you guys are just boring. Spotted the clown who can't accept even simple criticism of a show they like. who says i even like it. what im saying is literally facts, im not giving any opinion at all. all im saying is the description of the show lmao OP says his opinion and you get super mad and go into full copium mode when confronted with simple criticism. Forgive me for assuming you like the show💀💀 P.S. no where in the description does it say that the main character would be put down to look more pathetic just so his girlfriend could look cooler. That is an extremely valid criticism of the first 2 episodes. how is the main character more pathetic mans just got bad luck. also yeah people can critique the plot but this isnt criticism its just being straight up autistic and not understanding a very basic plot. you dont like it. fine. but dont get mad when you continue to watch something that spells everything out from the first episode. ORRRRR...you can fuck off and let people have whatever opinions they like? If someone doesn't like a plot point or particularly trope they can speak out about it? How is Izumi pathetic you ask? Look no further than the football scene. That was mostly anime original and it made him look like such an autistic moron. There are plenty of valid reasons to critique this show. Get off the copium. if you wanna let people have opinions then why bother arguing with me. also with the football scene, i just know you would not be complaining if it was a big tiddy anime bitch. it was legit like 20 seconds, its a bit worrying how angry one scene is making you. I promise you...regardless of gender, race, ethnicity or any other distinguishing feature of a character, that scene would have been pathetic to me. No real human being is that incompetent unless they have an actual disability. The scene didn't piss me off in the slightest, but YOU asked how Izumi was shown to be more pathetic and I answered your question. Manga readers won't deny the fact the anime makes Izumi look worse. |
May 20, 2022 3:58 PM
#127
LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: I disagree that a reverse damsel trope isn't any better, there's a specific reason why it's viewed as a tired cliché for the woman to need saving by a strong man, it's an entirely different situation if the man needs saving by a strong woman, this is reversing the very ideas that make the original trope old fashioned to begin with. You can't ignore that this puts a decidedly progressive spin on the trope, it's a bad thing if it's just making fun of the man, but that's not how it's handled in the manga, while the anime may be less clear about that.DankWeeb said: Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Well idk about you, but I don't think I'm being toxic despite agreeing with you. I like the main characters in general to be USEFUL and RELEVANT. I hate when the male MC does all the work and female lead is just a damsel in distress. Most of my favorite female leads or once favorites were because they contributed to the story in some way. Shikimori is just a reversed version of "damsel in distress" instead. Doesn't make it any better... just mildly different. And no a MC doesn't need to be "strong" as people seem to imply here, just not useless. some identifiable personality trait. Make the conversations less dry. Have relevance to how things in the story play out regardless if he make things better or for worse. Hachiman and Yukino are great main characters. Not only do they both contribute to the story and is useful and relevant, they also work well with each other. There's banter. Izumi is a shell, you can replace him with any random nice guy and you get the same result. It is the same issue with 90% of harems with useless trophy cheerleading squads. Why do Shikimori like him? What make their relationship unique and INTERESTING? How do they BOTH contribute to the relationship/story? I mean first of all we don't have any real story going on... but the relationship is entirely one sided with no chemistry whatsoever Izumi isn't useless either unless you're looking at him from a stereotypically masculine point of view, in which case he's not very athletic, he's a bit clumsy, and for some reason the universe wants to kill him, all things that make him look pathetic as a man. Not to mention that he needs a woman to save him, and he can get flustered/embarrassed when she acts dominantly towards him, which is just another strike against him. All of the complaints against him are mainly coming from the position that he's a failure as a man. Now, while the manga is far superior, it's still a very simple kind of series, it's mostly just a lot of cute interactions and fluff, if you're looking for real depth to any of these characters, it's just not going to happen. There's some semi-emotional/dramatic moments, but everything is surface level, it's not aiming for the kind of realism that allows for true character dimension. However, the anime is just an awful adaptation compared to how the manga feels, the simple nature isn't a bad thing. As for your questions, Shikimori likes him because he's a kind and earnest person, and she thinks he's very cute. What's unique about their relationship is that she's often the more dominant of the two, which is not the norm for a heterosexual pairing, but they're both comfortable with it. They contribute to the relationship by treating the other with respect, and being thoughtful towards the other. Of course, they act like 5th graders, it's not a realistic series, that's just how it is. He is useless, or at least with what I managed to sit through. I seen a youtube video of a later scene where he seems to have done something? Not sure without the context. But I dropped the show so I can't comment further. At least the first few episodes shows he's useless. He is useless not because lack of masculine traits. He is useless because he doesn't have an effect on his surrounding at all beyond superficial things that have no relevance to the course of events even within a singular episode. He is borderline a ghost in this story. Maybe later episodes proves me wrong but the initial impression of him is bad enough that I don't want to sit through it. And even a normal damsel in distress have greater influence in the story as it usually lead to the hero going through some arduous journey. Here is just a couple seconds of quick laughs or wholesomeness. And IMO, a reversed trope is equally bad. A reverse damsel in distress may bring some novelty initially and is a good way to hook you in with a interesting premise. But if you don't build upon it, then it's just wasted potential. We see that with the million isekai out there where they have some sort of quirk but none of them bring more to the table than that initial hook. Being nice and treating your partner with respect should be a standard in all relationships and certainly is very common in an anime. That doesn't make the relationship anymore interesting and certainly doesn't emphasize any of their chemistry with each other. I don't buy that a reverse damsel in distress is enough to make this interesting, although you don't have to agree with me. |
zcv45May 20, 2022 4:02 PM
May 20, 2022 5:40 PM
#128
zcv45 said: Except, his lack of masculinity is exactly why you think he doesn't have much of an impact on the story, but I can't blame you for not understanding what his true role is in the series when the anime executes the premise this terribly. I would argue that he is easily the most relevant character, and that's largely why people react so negatively to the fact he's pathetic and annoying to watch. This is not a series that you're going to enjoy if you attempt to only watch for Shikimori compared to Marin in MDUD. But yeah, the anime is a pretty awful adaptation, so it is what it is.LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: DankWeeb said: Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Well idk about you, but I don't think I'm being toxic despite agreeing with you. I like the main characters in general to be USEFUL and RELEVANT. I hate when the male MC does all the work and female lead is just a damsel in distress. Most of my favorite female leads or once favorites were because they contributed to the story in some way. Shikimori is just a reversed version of "damsel in distress" instead. Doesn't make it any better... just mildly different. And no a MC doesn't need to be "strong" as people seem to imply here, just not useless. some identifiable personality trait. Make the conversations less dry. Have relevance to how things in the story play out regardless if he make things better or for worse. Hachiman and Yukino are great main characters. Not only do they both contribute to the story and is useful and relevant, they also work well with each other. There's banter. Izumi is a shell, you can replace him with any random nice guy and you get the same result. It is the same issue with 90% of harems with useless trophy cheerleading squads. Why do Shikimori like him? What make their relationship unique and INTERESTING? How do they BOTH contribute to the relationship/story? I mean first of all we don't have any real story going on... but the relationship is entirely one sided with no chemistry whatsoever Izumi isn't useless either unless you're looking at him from a stereotypically masculine point of view, in which case he's not very athletic, he's a bit clumsy, and for some reason the universe wants to kill him, all things that make him look pathetic as a man. Not to mention that he needs a woman to save him, and he can get flustered/embarrassed when she acts dominantly towards him, which is just another strike against him. All of the complaints against him are mainly coming from the position that he's a failure as a man. Now, while the manga is far superior, it's still a very simple kind of series, it's mostly just a lot of cute interactions and fluff, if you're looking for real depth to any of these characters, it's just not going to happen. There's some semi-emotional/dramatic moments, but everything is surface level, it's not aiming for the kind of realism that allows for true character dimension. However, the anime is just an awful adaptation compared to how the manga feels, the simple nature isn't a bad thing. As for your questions, Shikimori likes him because he's a kind and earnest person, and she thinks he's very cute. What's unique about their relationship is that she's often the more dominant of the two, which is not the norm for a heterosexual pairing, but they're both comfortable with it. They contribute to the relationship by treating the other with respect, and being thoughtful towards the other. Of course, they act like 5th graders, it's not a realistic series, that's just how it is. He is useless, or at least with what I managed to sit through. I seen a youtube video of a later scene where he seems to have done something? Not sure without the context. But I dropped the show so I can't comment further. At least the first few episodes shows he's useless. He is useless not because lack of masculine traits. He is useless because he doesn't have an effect on his surrounding at all beyond superficial things that have no relevance to the course of events even within a singular episode. He is borderline a ghost in this story. Maybe later episodes proves me wrong but the initial impression of him is bad enough that I don't want to sit through it. And even a normal damsel in distress have greater influence in the story as it usually lead to the hero going through some arduous journey. Here is just a couple seconds of quick laughs or wholesomeness. And IMO, a reversed trope is equally bad. A reverse damsel in distress may bring some novelty initially and is a good way to hook you in with a interesting premise. But if you don't build upon it, then it's just wasted potential. We see that with the million isekai out there where they have some sort of quirk but none of them bring more to the table than that initial hook. Being nice and treating your partner with respect should be a standard in all relationships and certainly is very common in an anime. That doesn't make the relationship anymore interesting and certainly doesn't emphasize any of their chemistry with each other. I don't buy that a reverse damsel in distress is enough to make this interesting, although you don't have to agree with me. |
| If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
May 20, 2022 5:42 PM
#129
| "Dude is nothing more than a punching bag and a tool for glorifying shikomori's badass behavior. The anime constantly tries to put him down while glorifying shikomori. It feels really forced" Can't help but agree with this line. |
May 22, 2022 12:54 AM
#130
Sealshark122 said: The only thing wrong is the haters Izumi is a great husband Keep telling yourself that. |
May 22, 2022 1:22 AM
#131
DankWeeb said: His lack of masculine traits and his overall loser mentality around his bad luck. I don't like or dislike Izumi Imo his lack of masculinity is not the reason people dislike him it's his generic character. It's a SoL, so I don't think they'll change his character anytime soon |
May 22, 2022 6:05 AM
#133
EdgyLord666 said: I only agree with this on the first 2 episode, it gets better after that. Exactly, it's a bit overdone and improves a lot after episodes 2-3. thehornedrat said: After finding out what a bolo tie is, looks like another the message trait added there by the PC scum that is NBCUniversal, to exemplify her masculinity. Lol, to think I thought its supposed to look feminine. Anyway, thus with myself revealing to be not from America...('wtf is that necklace?' lol)....I'm super keen on acquiring a similar orange jade one myself as jewelry. Bolo ties work for any gender. I wouldn't necessarily call them masculine, maybe formal depending on the colour? There's nothing wrong with being politically correct if it doesn't impair the director's vision, but nothing about this anime is PC/not-PC, so not sure why you brought that up. LostSpectre said: Ice-Cube said: You're supposed to view Izumi on the same level of cuteness as Shikimori, at least that's crystal clear in the manga, not so much in the anime.one the main problems I have with Izumi is not entirely based on how unmasculine he is. The main issue I have with the anime is the fact that he's just there to show off shikimori, I know that's the whole premise of the show but it feels like they're completely overlooking izumi as a character and the fact that the only remarkable thing about him is his bad luck but even that trait gets overused doesn't make him any better as a character. I can only hope he gets some sort of development and not every episode be a constant show of the cute and cool shikimori. I believe in izumi supremacy more than shokimori lol I think the anime gets this point across very well. I also think this is what makes many people dislike it. A lot of people feel meh about effeminate men or that guys can be cute. Two of my old roommates once had a whole discussion where she said guys could be cute, but he said men cannot be cute but only can be handsome. I think another similar example of awkwardness is when two guys being affectionate makes cispeople (generally men) feel at unease. I don't think any of this is necessarily toxic masculinity. Something you're not used to or feel weird about doesn't make your response toxic. You don't have to like it, but you do have to be a bit open to it to enjoy this anime. |
May 22, 2022 11:37 AM
#134
Bl-zz said: I strongly disagree, the majority of people were trashing him for being a typically pathetic ML. The anime does not make it clear at all that you're rooting for him as much as Shikimori, plenty of people have stated that he's just a blank slate that's there to make her look good. There are so many reasons that the anime screws up where the manga succeeds. I pretty much find him unlikable in the, anime and I think he's adorable in the manga, that tells you everything you need to know. I think the anime gets this point across very well. I also think this is what makes many people dislike it. A lot of people feel meh about effeminate men or that guys can be cute. Two of my old roommates once had a whole discussion where she said guys could be cute, but he said men cannot be cute but only can be handsome. I think another similar example of awkwardness is when two guys being affectionate makes cispeople (generally men) feel at unease. I don't think any of this is necessarily toxic masculinity. Something you're not used to or feel weird about doesn't make your response toxic. You don't have to like it, but you do have to be a bit open to it to enjoy this anime. |
| If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
May 22, 2022 12:54 PM
#135
| My opinion tells me everything I need to know. By now he's being fleshed out more and more with every episode than what half the people here have judged about, as most comments here were posted prior to the last two episodes and some of the authors mentioned they stopped watching after those 2-3 episodes. As an anime-only these episodes are all I have to go with. Of course you find him relatively unlikable, since you know a fully fleshed out version of this character from the manga and you're comparing while he's nowhere near as fleshed out in the anime yet. And to top that off he indeed started as a support item to show off his girlfriend's coolness in the first 2-3 episodes. If we go with the standard advice to watch three episodes and decide whether you like the show, I understand why some would tap out, since it wasn't until the next three episodes that he became more of a character than his misfortune as plot device. We're now 6 episodes and a commentary episode in, I'm curious if people have changed their mind about anime Izumi versus when most posted here over 2 epis ago. |
May 22, 2022 1:41 PM
#136
Bl-zz said: If you're talking to me, you actually have to quote me... Anyway, I liked him almost immediately in the manga, so that's not the case. My opinion tells me everything I need to know. By now he's being fleshed out more and more with every episode than what half the people here have judged about, as most comments here were posted prior to the last two episodes and some of the authors mentioned they stopped watching after those 2-3 episodes. As an anime-only these episodes are all I have to go with. Of course you find him relatively unlikable, since you know a fully fleshed out version of this character from the manga and you're comparing while he's nowhere near as fleshed out in the anime yet. And to top that off he indeed started as a support item to show off his girlfriend's coolness in the first 2-3 episodes. If we go with the standard advice to watch three episodes and decide whether you like the show, I understand why some would tap out, since it wasn't until the next three episodes that he became more of a character than his misfortune as plot device. We're now 6 episodes and a commentary episode in, I'm curious if people have changed their mind about anime Izumi versus when most posted here over 2 epis ago. |
| If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
May 22, 2022 5:50 PM
#137
SkyhighCFC said: LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: You're way too hung up on this inconsequential difference, they're both damsel in distress tropes, whether one occurs more frequently or not.LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: That's literally not how it works, she was a damsel in distress in that particular instance, and to the threat of sexual assault no less. If anything, it could easily be argued that her being a perfectly capable fighter makes the trope more egregious, it is not in any way limited to completely helpless females, it's not like Asuna couldn't handle herself, either. EdgyLord666 said: SkyhighCFC said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: DankWeeb said: I am currently on episode 3. From the beginning i didn't like izumi. His lack of masculine traits and his overall loser mentality around his bad luck. It felt kinda hypocritical when i repeated this phrase inside my mind so i overlooked this fact and decided to continue watching it anyways. And maybe now i have realized the reason i hate him. The way they keep using him in the first two episodes. Dude is nothing more than a punching bag and a tool for glorifying shikomori's badass behavior. The anime constantly tries to put him down while glorifying shikomori. It feels really forced. Of course he has his own redeemable qualities but he never got the stage he deserved. He feels more like a side character. Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Anime is full of strong women in meaningful relationships. What it hasn't had much of in a while is the female equivalent of Izumi, the "damsel in distress" type. That's one of the tedious things about this show, it's reversing a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned, so what point is it making and who even cares. On top of that, the romance is flat and the comedy is non existent. disclaimer: all these observations as at episode three, after which I hard dropped this. Said someone with skeleton knight in their favorite. First off, you have no idea why I have skeleton knight favourited. I'm sure you think you made a barbed point there, once you try to explain it you'll probably realise how lame it was. If you can't explain your point then I'll do it for you. do it mate, obviously I have no idea why, I just thought you're quite blind for saying "a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned" while literally watching white knight saving chicks here & there. Okay, so the point you were trying to make is that me enjoying a show that literally features a knight who saves people as its central premise somehow negates me being able to criticise this show Here's what you focused on What it hasn't had much of in a while is the "damsel in distress" type. Here's what I actually wrote Anime is full of strong women in meaningful relationships. What it hasn't had much of in a while is the female equivalent of Izumi, the "damsel in distress" type. That's one of the tedious things about this show, it's reversing a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned, so what point is it making and who even cares. You see, I'm talking about the relationship you just dived in with some shit about side characters in a fantasy show I'll take watching a skeleton knight saving innocent victims of crime over this tedious and repetitive damsel in distress fest any day. and? Those "innocent victims" are literally damsel in distress. The difference is the fact that they are literally side characters. The main female in that show is certainly not some damsel in distress. Well thx for supporting my point, although I disagree with the main female stupid enough to think kidnappers would fight fair & square, proceed to cried & almost got raped till the white knight save her is "certainly not some damsel in distress". One single instance where there was a hostage situation does not make her a damsel in distress type character. The only reason she was in that position was because there was a hostage. She would easily merk every single one of them under normal circumstances. Izumi on the other hand is a damsel in distress in most situations in the show and can't do anything about it. The 2 are not the same at all. There is a big big difference between being put into a "damsel in distress situation" and full on BEING a damsel in distress type character. In the former, the character would under normal circumstances be able to get out of that situation, but due to some circumstance, they can't...OR they are simply in an unfair situation (like a 3 v 1 against people of similar strength). The latter described characters who are in constant need of being saved pretty much regardless of the situation. The girl from Skeleton Knight doesn't constantly need to be saved, and is thus not a damsel in distress type character. The fact that one is almost constant and the other was a one off is a pretty big difference my guy. But it does make a difference though. The other guy was basically calling someone a hypocrite for liking Skeleton knight but disliking Shikimori because there's a damsel in distress type character, despite the fact they're 2 completely different types of shows and none of the main characters in Skeleton Knight are constant damsels in distress. Not comparable. Bruh, are you talking about me? You could just use the quote feature. I never called someone a hypocrite for liking Skeleton knight but disliking Shikimori, I just said "you're quite blind for saying 'a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned' while literally watching white knight saving chicks here & there" |
May 22, 2022 6:02 PM
#138
Bl-zz said: EdgyLord666 said: I only agree with this on the first 2 episode, it gets better after that. Exactly, it's a bit overdone and improves a lot after episodes 2-3. thehornedrat said: After finding out what a bolo tie is, looks like another the message trait added there by the PC scum that is NBCUniversal, to exemplify her masculinity. Lol, to think I thought its supposed to look feminine. Anyway, thus with myself revealing to be not from America...('wtf is that necklace?' lol)....I'm super keen on acquiring a similar orange jade one myself as jewelry. Bolo ties work for any gender. I wouldn't necessarily call them masculine, maybe formal depending on the colour? There's nothing wrong with being politically correct if it doesn't impair the director's vision, but nothing about this anime is PC/not-PC, so not sure why you brought that up. LostSpectre said: Ice-Cube said: one the main problems I have with Izumi is not entirely based on how unmasculine he is. The main issue I have with the anime is the fact that he's just there to show off shikimori, I know that's the whole premise of the show but it feels like they're completely overlooking izumi as a character and the fact that the only remarkable thing about him is his bad luck but even that trait gets overused doesn't make him any better as a character. I can only hope he gets some sort of development and not every episode be a constant show of the cute and cool shikimori. I believe in izumi supremacy more than shokimori lol I think the anime gets this point across very well. I also think this is what makes many people dislike it. A lot of people feel meh about effeminate men or that guys can be cute. Two of my old roommates once had a whole discussion where she said guys could be cute, but he said men cannot be cute but only can be handsome. I think another similar example of awkwardness is when two guys being affectionate makes cispeople (generally men) feel at unease. I don't think any of this is necessarily toxic masculinity. Something you're not used to or feel weird about doesn't make your response toxic. You don't have to like it, but you do have to be a bit open to it to enjoy this anime. I mean the 2 men being affectionate/touchy is definitely part of toxic masculinity. There are a lot of shows which are okay with women touching, flourting, kissing or other things and (usually men) people "enjoy" or are at least okay with it. When was the last scene you saw where 2 guys did anything like that casually in an anime that wasn't strictly as a joke? And if it happens how many of the comments are showing digust or calling it weird in the anime community? There is a reason things like that are almost never shown. Fetishization of lesbians is seen as okay but the other one is an absolute no go. Thats about as clear cut you can get with toxic masculinity. Also if anyone feels uneasy as a younger person when they see gay people then its time to do some introspection and think about what is bothering them so much about it to mention how displeasing they find something |
May 22, 2022 6:08 PM
#139
EdgyLord666 said: SkyhighCFC said: LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: It makes zero difference to the trope itself, which is the entire point, not which one is more of a damsel than the other, my guy. LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: You're way too hung up on this inconsequential difference, they're both damsel in distress tropes, whether one occurs more frequently or not.LostSpectre said: SkyhighCFC said: That's literally not how it works, she was a damsel in distress in that particular instance, and to the threat of sexual assault no less. If anything, it could easily be argued that her being a perfectly capable fighter makes the trope more egregious, it is not in any way limited to completely helpless females, it's not like Asuna couldn't handle herself, either. EdgyLord666 said: SkyhighCFC said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: EdgyLord666 said: borderliner said: DankWeeb said: I am currently on episode 3. From the beginning i didn't like izumi. His lack of masculine traits and his overall loser mentality around his bad luck. It felt kinda hypocritical when i repeated this phrase inside my mind so i overlooked this fact and decided to continue watching it anyways. And maybe now i have realized the reason i hate him. The way they keep using him in the first two episodes. Dude is nothing more than a punching bag and a tool for glorifying shikomori's badass behavior. The anime constantly tries to put him down while glorifying shikomori. It feels really forced. Of course he has his own redeemable qualities but he never got the stage he deserved. He feels more like a side character. Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Anime is full of strong women in meaningful relationships. What it hasn't had much of in a while is the female equivalent of Izumi, the "damsel in distress" type. That's one of the tedious things about this show, it's reversing a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned, so what point is it making and who even cares. On top of that, the romance is flat and the comedy is non existent. disclaimer: all these observations as at episode three, after which I hard dropped this. Said someone with skeleton knight in their favorite. First off, you have no idea why I have skeleton knight favourited. I'm sure you think you made a barbed point there, once you try to explain it you'll probably realise how lame it was. If you can't explain your point then I'll do it for you. do it mate, obviously I have no idea why, I just thought you're quite blind for saying "a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned" while literally watching white knight saving chicks here & there. Okay, so the point you were trying to make is that me enjoying a show that literally features a knight who saves people as its central premise somehow negates me being able to criticise this show Here's what you focused on What it hasn't had much of in a while is the "damsel in distress" type. Here's what I actually wrote Anime is full of strong women in meaningful relationships. What it hasn't had much of in a while is the female equivalent of Izumi, the "damsel in distress" type. That's one of the tedious things about this show, it's reversing a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned, so what point is it making and who even cares. You see, I'm talking about the relationship you just dived in with some shit about side characters in a fantasy show I'll take watching a skeleton knight saving innocent victims of crime over this tedious and repetitive damsel in distress fest any day. and? Those "innocent victims" are literally damsel in distress. The difference is the fact that they are literally side characters. The main female in that show is certainly not some damsel in distress. Well thx for supporting my point, although I disagree with the main female stupid enough to think kidnappers would fight fair & square, proceed to cried & almost got raped till the white knight save her is "certainly not some damsel in distress". One single instance where there was a hostage situation does not make her a damsel in distress type character. The only reason she was in that position was because there was a hostage. She would easily merk every single one of them under normal circumstances. Izumi on the other hand is a damsel in distress in most situations in the show and can't do anything about it. The 2 are not the same at all. There is a big big difference between being put into a "damsel in distress situation" and full on BEING a damsel in distress type character. In the former, the character would under normal circumstances be able to get out of that situation, but due to some circumstance, they can't...OR they are simply in an unfair situation (like a 3 v 1 against people of similar strength). The latter described characters who are in constant need of being saved pretty much regardless of the situation. The girl from Skeleton Knight doesn't constantly need to be saved, and is thus not a damsel in distress type character. The fact that one is almost constant and the other was a one off is a pretty big difference my guy. But it does make a difference though. The other guy was basically calling someone a hypocrite for liking Skeleton knight but disliking Shikimori because there's a damsel in distress type character, despite the fact they're 2 completely different types of shows and none of the main characters in Skeleton Knight are constant damsels in distress. Not comparable. Bruh, are you talking about me? You could just use the quote feature. I never called someone a hypocrite for liking Skeleton knight but disliking Shikimori, I just said "you're quite blind for saying 'a trope that's already been pretty much abandoned' while literally watching white knight saving chicks here & there" Yea I was talking about you, but only because LostSpectre was trying to speak on your behalf. We already went over this. |
May 22, 2022 9:17 PM
#140
LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: Except, his lack of masculinity is exactly why you think he doesn't have much of an impact on the story, but I can't blame you for not understanding what his true role is in the series when the anime executes the premise this terribly. I would argue that he is easily the most relevant character, and that's largely why people react so negatively to the fact he's pathetic and annoying to watch. This is not a series that you're going to enjoy if you attempt to only watch for Shikimori compared to Marin in MDUD. But yeah, the anime is a pretty awful adaptation, so it is what it is.LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: I disagree that a reverse damsel trope isn't any better, there's a specific reason why it's viewed as a tired cliché for the woman to need saving by a strong man, it's an entirely different situation if the man needs saving by a strong woman, this is reversing the very ideas that make the original trope old fashioned to begin with. You can't ignore that this puts a decidedly progressive spin on the trope, it's a bad thing if it's just making fun of the man, but that's not how it's handled in the manga, while the anime may be less clear about that.DankWeeb said: Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Well idk about you, but I don't think I'm being toxic despite agreeing with you. I like the main characters in general to be USEFUL and RELEVANT. I hate when the male MC does all the work and female lead is just a damsel in distress. Most of my favorite female leads or once favorites were because they contributed to the story in some way. Shikimori is just a reversed version of "damsel in distress" instead. Doesn't make it any better... just mildly different. And no a MC doesn't need to be "strong" as people seem to imply here, just not useless. some identifiable personality trait. Make the conversations less dry. Have relevance to how things in the story play out regardless if he make things better or for worse. Hachiman and Yukino are great main characters. Not only do they both contribute to the story and is useful and relevant, they also work well with each other. There's banter. Izumi is a shell, you can replace him with any random nice guy and you get the same result. It is the same issue with 90% of harems with useless trophy cheerleading squads. Why do Shikimori like him? What make their relationship unique and INTERESTING? How do they BOTH contribute to the relationship/story? I mean first of all we don't have any real story going on... but the relationship is entirely one sided with no chemistry whatsoever Izumi isn't useless either unless you're looking at him from a stereotypically masculine point of view, in which case he's not very athletic, he's a bit clumsy, and for some reason the universe wants to kill him, all things that make him look pathetic as a man. Not to mention that he needs a woman to save him, and he can get flustered/embarrassed when she acts dominantly towards him, which is just another strike against him. All of the complaints against him are mainly coming from the position that he's a failure as a man. Now, while the manga is far superior, it's still a very simple kind of series, it's mostly just a lot of cute interactions and fluff, if you're looking for real depth to any of these characters, it's just not going to happen. There's some semi-emotional/dramatic moments, but everything is surface level, it's not aiming for the kind of realism that allows for true character dimension. However, the anime is just an awful adaptation compared to how the manga feels, the simple nature isn't a bad thing. As for your questions, Shikimori likes him because he's a kind and earnest person, and she thinks he's very cute. What's unique about their relationship is that she's often the more dominant of the two, which is not the norm for a heterosexual pairing, but they're both comfortable with it. They contribute to the relationship by treating the other with respect, and being thoughtful towards the other. Of course, they act like 5th graders, it's not a realistic series, that's just how it is. He is useless, or at least with what I managed to sit through. I seen a youtube video of a later scene where he seems to have done something? Not sure without the context. But I dropped the show so I can't comment further. At least the first few episodes shows he's useless. He is useless not because lack of masculine traits. He is useless because he doesn't have an effect on his surrounding at all beyond superficial things that have no relevance to the course of events even within a singular episode. He is borderline a ghost in this story. Maybe later episodes proves me wrong but the initial impression of him is bad enough that I don't want to sit through it. And even a normal damsel in distress have greater influence in the story as it usually lead to the hero going through some arduous journey. Here is just a couple seconds of quick laughs or wholesomeness. And IMO, a reversed trope is equally bad. A reverse damsel in distress may bring some novelty initially and is a good way to hook you in with a interesting premise. But if you don't build upon it, then it's just wasted potential. We see that with the million isekai out there where they have some sort of quirk but none of them bring more to the table than that initial hook. Being nice and treating your partner with respect should be a standard in all relationships and certainly is very common in an anime. That doesn't make the relationship anymore interesting and certainly doesn't emphasize any of their chemistry with each other. I don't buy that a reverse damsel in distress is enough to make this interesting, although you don't have to agree with me. Except I said it wasn't because his lack of masculinity. Stop putting words in my mouth and forcing YOUR interpretation. That's just blatant strawmanning and is quite annoying. If you don't think he is useless, then you can at least provide examples of that instead of chocking up my explanation to "lack of masculinity." Maybe the anime sucks compared to the manga. Fair enough. Maybe he's not useless in the manga. But he's useless in the anime. I don't see any point in discussing this further if you won't listen to your interlocutor. |
zcv45May 22, 2022 9:22 PM
May 23, 2022 12:14 PM
#141
| I just dislike how he keeps taking up screentime, while Shikimori does not get enough, despite the anime is named after her. He is just generic and bland, but what I hate more is his voice acting, whenever he panicks, it just sets me off. |
| August 6th 2023: Biggest upset ever, deception, selfishness, or scammed, manipulated. Heavy damage costs, and more. Days since: 15 Last updated: 8/21/2023 One Piece Episode 1041 & 1042 & 1047 & 1048 & 95.75%/1049 & 1053 were a mistake and Uta brought the salvation -AhriTheS3xyFox |
May 23, 2022 1:12 PM
#142
| I've read the manga even before the anime announcement and I already know this series is just a fanservice series for femdom fetish. Definitely one of my least fav slice of life. It's not like I really hate the idea of femdom, but this series just so bad at executing it. -repetitive -cringe comedy -forced glorified femdom etc. My problem isn't just at Izumi. Shikomori was wack as well. I didn't even see her as a character, I see her as an object to satisfy the fetish of target audience. Fortunately it didn't work for me, unlike a lot of people who got baited in the first eps. Following this, I also didn't see Izumi as a character. In my mind, I see the author purposely made Izumi as feminine as possible to accomplish 2 things. -Plot device for femdom moment by Shikomori -Targeting most girls who like this type of man character usually exist in yaoi doujin Tbh, even if the characters was made for that type of reason, it'll be okay if it's followed by good execution. But sadly it's not. I've said 3 main reason before. About the repetitive part, stop saying stuff like, "It's slice of life, ofc it's repetitive". It's disrespectful towards slice of life genre. Check my watchlist you could see that I watch a lot of slice of life so I know there's a good and bad slice of life as well. Even tho slice of life mostly aren't heavy plot oriented, good slice of life still had on going story and creativity which made each episode don't feel repetitive. Cringe comedy is subjective, forced glorified femdom moments already explained by ts. I've seen people said manga is better, but I don't think so. Other that art quality, the anime just felt exactly like the manga to me. I remember cringing hard at every femdom moments when reading the manga, and the same thing happened when I watch the anime. If you ask why I still read or watch the anime? I'm the type of guy who will finish what I've started just in case it's getting good. But so far I don't like the series at all. The only okay thing is Kamiya arc, since the repetitive forced femdom moments stopped there. But it's still mid, not enough to elevate my enjoyment. Especially since the series just get back to its usual repetitive forced femdom moments after that. I can say that I'm not cringing as hard, but it's just because the repetitiveness is too strong even my cringing ability got dulled. |
May 23, 2022 2:17 PM
#143
gintokisbicep said: how is the main character more pathetic mans just got bad luck. also yeah people can critique the plot but this isnt criticism its just being straight up autistic and not understanding a very basic plot. you dont like it. fine. but dont get mad when you continue to watch something that spells everything out from the first episode. y'know I feel like some of the people fretting over izumi's lack of masculinity or the repetitiveness are also the same kinda people who'd be frothing from the mouth over the likes of takagi-san and nagatoro and the such |
'On-Hold' is another way for a completionist to say 'Dropped' |
May 24, 2022 4:58 AM
#144
| I have absolutely no problem with submissive MC. We all enjoyed Nagatoro afterall. The problem is, that Izumi completely lacks personality, thus has no chemistry with his GF. The only joke this show has, which is Izumi's bad luck got repetitive by the end of first episode. Bad protagonist can singlehandedly drag the show to the bottom and decent waifu won't save it by herself. |
May 24, 2022 5:52 AM
#145
V1P3R0P said: 'repetitive troupe where the guy is chad'DankWeeb said: I am currently on episode 3. From the beginning i didn't like izumi. His lack of masculine traits and his overall loser mentality around his bad luck. It felt kinda hypocritical when i repeated this phrase inside my mind so i overlooked this fact and decided to continue watching it anyways. And maybe now i have realized the reason i hate him. The way they keep using him in the first two episodes. Dude is nothing more than a punching bag and a tool for glorifying shikomori's badass behavior. The anime constantly tries to put him down while glorifying shikomori. It feels really forced. Of course he has his own redeemable qualities but he never got the stage he deserved. He feels more like a side character. Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? tl;dr. I'm actually bored with the repetitive troupe where the guy is a chad, his girl is always in trouble. I actually felt refreshed with this change in setting. It doesnt interest many people, but it is what it is. can't help!! You're talking as if it's very common |
May 24, 2022 10:25 AM
#146
zcv45 said: I just don't believe you, it seems obvious that his lack of masculine traits are connected to your opinion that he's useless. LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: I disagree that a reverse damsel trope isn't any better, there's a specific reason why it's viewed as a tired cliché for the woman to need saving by a strong man, it's an entirely different situation if the man needs saving by a strong woman, this is reversing the very ideas that make the original trope old fashioned to begin with. You can't ignore that this puts a decidedly progressive spin on the trope, it's a bad thing if it's just making fun of the man, but that's not how it's handled in the manga, while the anime may be less clear about that.DankWeeb said: Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Well idk about you, but I don't think I'm being toxic despite agreeing with you. I like the main characters in general to be USEFUL and RELEVANT. I hate when the male MC does all the work and female lead is just a damsel in distress. Most of my favorite female leads or once favorites were because they contributed to the story in some way. Shikimori is just a reversed version of "damsel in distress" instead. Doesn't make it any better... just mildly different. And no a MC doesn't need to be "strong" as people seem to imply here, just not useless. some identifiable personality trait. Make the conversations less dry. Have relevance to how things in the story play out regardless if he make things better or for worse. Hachiman and Yukino are great main characters. Not only do they both contribute to the story and is useful and relevant, they also work well with each other. There's banter. Izumi is a shell, you can replace him with any random nice guy and you get the same result. It is the same issue with 90% of harems with useless trophy cheerleading squads. Why do Shikimori like him? What make their relationship unique and INTERESTING? How do they BOTH contribute to the relationship/story? I mean first of all we don't have any real story going on... but the relationship is entirely one sided with no chemistry whatsoever Izumi isn't useless either unless you're looking at him from a stereotypically masculine point of view, in which case he's not very athletic, he's a bit clumsy, and for some reason the universe wants to kill him, all things that make him look pathetic as a man. Not to mention that he needs a woman to save him, and he can get flustered/embarrassed when she acts dominantly towards him, which is just another strike against him. All of the complaints against him are mainly coming from the position that he's a failure as a man. Now, while the manga is far superior, it's still a very simple kind of series, it's mostly just a lot of cute interactions and fluff, if you're looking for real depth to any of these characters, it's just not going to happen. There's some semi-emotional/dramatic moments, but everything is surface level, it's not aiming for the kind of realism that allows for true character dimension. However, the anime is just an awful adaptation compared to how the manga feels, the simple nature isn't a bad thing. As for your questions, Shikimori likes him because he's a kind and earnest person, and she thinks he's very cute. What's unique about their relationship is that she's often the more dominant of the two, which is not the norm for a heterosexual pairing, but they're both comfortable with it. They contribute to the relationship by treating the other with respect, and being thoughtful towards the other. Of course, they act like 5th graders, it's not a realistic series, that's just how it is. He is useless, or at least with what I managed to sit through. I seen a youtube video of a later scene where he seems to have done something? Not sure without the context. But I dropped the show so I can't comment further. At least the first few episodes shows he's useless. He is useless not because lack of masculine traits. He is useless because he doesn't have an effect on his surrounding at all beyond superficial things that have no relevance to the course of events even within a singular episode. He is borderline a ghost in this story. Maybe later episodes proves me wrong but the initial impression of him is bad enough that I don't want to sit through it. And even a normal damsel in distress have greater influence in the story as it usually lead to the hero going through some arduous journey. Here is just a couple seconds of quick laughs or wholesomeness. And IMO, a reversed trope is equally bad. A reverse damsel in distress may bring some novelty initially and is a good way to hook you in with a interesting premise. But if you don't build upon it, then it's just wasted potential. We see that with the million isekai out there where they have some sort of quirk but none of them bring more to the table than that initial hook. Being nice and treating your partner with respect should be a standard in all relationships and certainly is very common in an anime. That doesn't make the relationship anymore interesting and certainly doesn't emphasize any of their chemistry with each other. I don't buy that a reverse damsel in distress is enough to make this interesting, although you don't have to agree with me. Except I said it wasn't because his lack of masculinity. Stop putting words in my mouth and forcing YOUR interpretation. That's just blatant strawmanning and is quite annoying. If you don't think he is useless, then you can at least provide examples of that instead of chocking up my explanation to "lack of masculinity." Maybe the anime sucks compared to the manga. Fair enough. Maybe he's not useless in the manga. But he's useless in the anime. I don't see any point in discussing this further if you won't listen to your interlocutor. |
| If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
May 24, 2022 3:09 PM
#147
May 29, 2022 1:06 PM
#148
Short_Circut said: gintokisbicep said: how is the main character more pathetic mans just got bad luck. also yeah people can critique the plot but this isnt criticism its just being straight up autistic and not understanding a very basic plot. you dont like it. fine. but dont get mad when you continue to watch something that spells everything out from the first episode. y'know I feel like some of the people fretting over izumi's lack of masculinity or the repetitiveness are also the same kinda people who'd be frothing from the mouth over the likes of takagi-san and nagatoro and the such Comparing 3 completely different types of shows, so idk what you're really trying to say here. You really thought you ate huh? |
May 29, 2022 1:07 PM
#149
LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: I just don't believe you, it seems obvious that his lack of masculine traits are connected to your opinion that he's useless. LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: Except, his lack of masculinity is exactly why you think he doesn't have much of an impact on the story, but I can't blame you for not understanding what his true role is in the series when the anime executes the premise this terribly. I would argue that he is easily the most relevant character, and that's largely why people react so negatively to the fact he's pathetic and annoying to watch. This is not a series that you're going to enjoy if you attempt to only watch for Shikimori compared to Marin in MDUD. But yeah, the anime is a pretty awful adaptation, so it is what it is.LostSpectre said: zcv45 said: I disagree that a reverse damsel trope isn't any better, there's a specific reason why it's viewed as a tired cliché for the woman to need saving by a strong man, it's an entirely different situation if the man needs saving by a strong woman, this is reversing the very ideas that make the original trope old fashioned to begin with. You can't ignore that this puts a decidedly progressive spin on the trope, it's a bad thing if it's just making fun of the man, but that's not how it's handled in the manga, while the anime may be less clear about that.DankWeeb said: Does anyone agree with me or i am in reality a hypocrite who harbors toxic masculinity and cant tolerate a woman-in-charge in any situation? Well idk about you, but I don't think I'm being toxic despite agreeing with you. I like the main characters in general to be USEFUL and RELEVANT. I hate when the male MC does all the work and female lead is just a damsel in distress. Most of my favorite female leads or once favorites were because they contributed to the story in some way. Shikimori is just a reversed version of "damsel in distress" instead. Doesn't make it any better... just mildly different. And no a MC doesn't need to be "strong" as people seem to imply here, just not useless. some identifiable personality trait. Make the conversations less dry. Have relevance to how things in the story play out regardless if he make things better or for worse. Hachiman and Yukino are great main characters. Not only do they both contribute to the story and is useful and relevant, they also work well with each other. There's banter. Izumi is a shell, you can replace him with any random nice guy and you get the same result. It is the same issue with 90% of harems with useless trophy cheerleading squads. Why do Shikimori like him? What make their relationship unique and INTERESTING? How do they BOTH contribute to the relationship/story? I mean first of all we don't have any real story going on... but the relationship is entirely one sided with no chemistry whatsoever Izumi isn't useless either unless you're looking at him from a stereotypically masculine point of view, in which case he's not very athletic, he's a bit clumsy, and for some reason the universe wants to kill him, all things that make him look pathetic as a man. Not to mention that he needs a woman to save him, and he can get flustered/embarrassed when she acts dominantly towards him, which is just another strike against him. All of the complaints against him are mainly coming from the position that he's a failure as a man. Now, while the manga is far superior, it's still a very simple kind of series, it's mostly just a lot of cute interactions and fluff, if you're looking for real depth to any of these characters, it's just not going to happen. There's some semi-emotional/dramatic moments, but everything is surface level, it's not aiming for the kind of realism that allows for true character dimension. However, the anime is just an awful adaptation compared to how the manga feels, the simple nature isn't a bad thing. As for your questions, Shikimori likes him because he's a kind and earnest person, and she thinks he's very cute. What's unique about their relationship is that she's often the more dominant of the two, which is not the norm for a heterosexual pairing, but they're both comfortable with it. They contribute to the relationship by treating the other with respect, and being thoughtful towards the other. Of course, they act like 5th graders, it's not a realistic series, that's just how it is. He is useless, or at least with what I managed to sit through. I seen a youtube video of a later scene where he seems to have done something? Not sure without the context. But I dropped the show so I can't comment further. At least the first few episodes shows he's useless. He is useless not because lack of masculine traits. He is useless because he doesn't have an effect on his surrounding at all beyond superficial things that have no relevance to the course of events even within a singular episode. He is borderline a ghost in this story. Maybe later episodes proves me wrong but the initial impression of him is bad enough that I don't want to sit through it. And even a normal damsel in distress have greater influence in the story as it usually lead to the hero going through some arduous journey. Here is just a couple seconds of quick laughs or wholesomeness. And IMO, a reversed trope is equally bad. A reverse damsel in distress may bring some novelty initially and is a good way to hook you in with a interesting premise. But if you don't build upon it, then it's just wasted potential. We see that with the million isekai out there where they have some sort of quirk but none of them bring more to the table than that initial hook. Being nice and treating your partner with respect should be a standard in all relationships and certainly is very common in an anime. That doesn't make the relationship anymore interesting and certainly doesn't emphasize any of their chemistry with each other. I don't buy that a reverse damsel in distress is enough to make this interesting, although you don't have to agree with me. Except I said it wasn't because his lack of masculinity. Stop putting words in my mouth and forcing YOUR interpretation. That's just blatant strawmanning and is quite annoying. If you don't think he is useless, then you can at least provide examples of that instead of chocking up my explanation to "lack of masculinity." Maybe the anime sucks compared to the manga. Fair enough. Maybe he's not useless in the manga. But he's useless in the anime. I don't see any point in discussing this further if you won't listen to your interlocutor. Lmao what a shockingly bad rebuttal |
May 29, 2022 2:53 PM
#150
SkyhighCFC said: Short_Circut said: gintokisbicep said: how is the main character more pathetic mans just got bad luck. also yeah people can critique the plot but this isnt criticism its just being straight up autistic and not understanding a very basic plot. you dont like it. fine. but dont get mad when you continue to watch something that spells everything out from the first episode. y'know I feel like some of the people fretting over izumi's lack of masculinity or the repetitiveness are also the same kinda people who'd be frothing from the mouth over the likes of takagi-san and nagatoro and the such Comparing 3 completely different types of shows, so idk what you're really trying to say here. You really thought you ate huh? You really thought you ate huh? wat Simply agreeing with @gintokisbicep 's statement that a lot of the "criticism" ITT is quite absurd (especially regarding the ones about Izumi's lack of masculinity), to which I conveniently mentioned 2 other series' that do have tons of repetitiveness and actual pathetic characters (Nishikata and from what I've seen Naoto) which people seem to well enjoy despite the aforementioned. For sure some of the criticism here is actual fair play criticism, like @zcv45 one for instance, but the majority of things I'm reading makes me feel like this is an introductory psychology course on how to detect signs of autism |
'On-Hold' is another way for a completionist to say 'Dropped' |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Kawaii dake ja Nai Shikimori-san Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Stark700 - Jul 9, 2022 |
232 |
by FedeMetal
»»
Sep 29, 3:02 PM |
|
Poll: » Kawaii dake ja Nai Shikimori-san Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Apr 23, 2022 |
176 |
by FedeMetal
»»
Sep 9, 11:00 AM |
|
Poll: » Kawaii dake ja Nai Shikimori-san Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Apr 9, 2022 |
356 |
by FedeMetal
»»
Sep 7, 7:50 PM |
|
Poll: » Kawaii dake ja Nai Shikimori-san Episode 6 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - May 14, 2022 |
155 |
by RamyStar
»»
Aug 10, 2:23 AM |
|
» Whats wrong with Beta MC ? ( 1 2 )ISeeLifePeople - Apr 11, 2022 |
70 |
by Gutzdeep42
»»
Jul 14, 6:29 AM |

