Pullman said:Lexicuetron said:The site says I need 5 letters in my post.
It's still not something that can be disagreed upon. You can either accept the facts that live filmed footage is not animation, or be in denial and pretend it's just a matter of subjective disagreement and that the only thing that should matter is whether something 'feels' like anime as if you could maintain a DB like that. Just saying you understand the explanations doesn't mean anything, because if you did you would see that it's a factual distinction and not some opinion you agree or disagree with. It's like saying you disagee with gravity, it makes no sense. Hence my suspicion that you don't
really understand the reasoning even if you say you believe you do.
I replied because I understand that you don't understand despite what you say, based on your reply, and still think this is just MAL being stubborn or 'shortsighted', as you phrased it (whatever that means exactly), when it's really an objective distinction that can't be changed and even if MAL wanted to include it, it couldn't without the whole DB turning into chaos because once the criteria is not being animation and being from japan/east-asia but instead just 'kinda feels like anime', it all becomes completely subjective and you could add literally anything western and live-action to the DB just because someone like you 'feels' it's similar enough to anime. Soon the DB would be full with western animations and cory in the house memes and end up being useless as an actual anime DB.
So if anything is shortsighted and shows unawareness of the responsability of handling a DB, it's your suggestion. It isn't a matter of agreeing and disagreeing, it's simply a matter of what can and can't be done while still maintaining the integrity of the DB and not making entry only depending on personal feelings.
But whatever. Sorry for not letting you exit this discussion while you make it seem like MAL is just 'disagreeing' with a perfectly valid opinion because they're stubborn and shortsighted. That isn't really the case, and I wanted to make that clear in case anyone else reads this thread. I didn't want it to end on such a misleading note. I didn't intend for you to come back after you said you're done with this thread, but since you already did it would have been nice if you actually tried to show some understanding of the underlying arguments as to why suggestions like this will always be declined, as to prove my assumption wrong. But instead you decided to show that you also don't understand the quote in my signature so I guess that's that..