Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums
New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Pages (6) « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » ... Last »
Mar 8, 2013 11:09 AM

Offline
Dec 2012
63
-michira- said:
danmari said:
-michira- said:
Linkark07 said:
Am I the only one that wants Makishima to win?


And I'm the only girl that wants Makishima to die in great pain :|


Nah. I mean, I don't hate him this much, but I don't particularly like him either. I prefer his worldview over Sibyl's, but those people who generously ignore the fact he has just as little regard for individual lives and see him as truly good rather than just controversial really tick me off.

I hate Sybil too. I wanted to make accent that I'm a girl that hates him, coz
almost all Psycho-Pass fangirls are like: "OMG he's killing Yuki, He's so adorable <3" or "Makishima is so cute, hot, lovely etc." :|||

LOL, I got what you meant there, too.

And 'No', you're not the only one either (I luvz my dudes level-headed and just, a la Kougami, lol). ;). Like I said in previous post to, danmari comment, it's truly creepy and disturbing at how some view Makishima.....as if him being 'hawt' and intelligent excuses the fact that he's a sadistic psycho-fuck....<_<
Mar 8, 2013 11:39 AM

Offline
Nov 2009
755
Some people simply loves him for being who he really is - a psychopath.
And, honestly, he's far more interesting because of that. Some love him for the qualities he possesses. Is there something wrong in this? Why is so disturbing to people? Is it wrong to love an interesting character, a character who is different than the goodies in a show, or even in real life? He's different than what we all see everyday, that's why he's appealing. And Kougami, for example, is the same as him. Honestly, all of the MWPSB are the same as Makishima - they kill, they are killers too. He's not just. Kougami currently is risking his life for an emotion, an obsession. Nor he is level-headed most of the time. Did we all forget those crazy expressions he made throughout the show? I think he keeps everything hidden and puts it aside, then sometimes everything is released.

Linkark07 said:
Am I the only one that wants Makishima to win?


Nope. I wanna see everything going to hell because in my life, i've never seen a show where the "bad" wins. It will be truly something awesome for me to see, though i doubt it'll happen.
bakuramariksMar 8, 2013 11:47 AM
Mar 8, 2013 12:39 PM
Offline
Feb 2012
4070
This episode was perfect in every sense of the word. Regardless of the aspect, it just felt spot-on.
The release of atomic energy has not created a new problem. It has merely made more urgent the necessity of solving an existing one. - Albert Einstein
Mar 8, 2013 12:56 PM

Offline
Sep 2012
536
Very sad that only has 2 episodes left, but it´s truly a great anime. I hope we get to see Makishima vs Kougami for real.
Mar 8, 2013 1:12 PM

Offline
Nov 2009
755
danmari said:
...


Of course i know they weren't directed at me. Why do you think that?
I just found it really shocking to see people who can't comprehend why some people may like psychopaths.
Mar 8, 2013 1:19 PM

Offline
Apr 2011
870
I meant that if you check out a scene when Makishima kills yuki (on youtube) there are comments like: "Omg he's doing it sooo cute~<3 I luv him"
-uh seriously? is killing an innocent person cute?

And yeah I have some favorite psychopaths too and I don't thinks it's wrong to like Mkishima. I just can't understand why don't fangirls fell even a little sorry for his victims (I mean innocent ones like Yuki, actually I liked him too when he kicked that bitches ass (Kaseis i mean))
-michira-Mar 8, 2013 1:27 PM
Mar 8, 2013 2:07 PM

Offline
Mar 2012
620
This episode felt like a recap about akane and sybil.
huntxMar 8, 2013 2:18 PM
Mar 8, 2013 3:09 PM

Offline
Jun 2012
2271
-michira- said:
I meant that if you check out a scene when Makishima kills yuki (on youtube) there are comments like: "Omg he's doing it sooo cute~<3 I luv him"
-uh seriously? is killing an innocent person cute?

And yeah I have some favorite psychopaths too and I don't thinks it's wrong to like Mkishima. I just can't understand why don't fangirls fell even a little sorry for his victims (I mean innocent ones like Yuki, actually I liked him too when he kicked that bitches ass (Kaseis i mean))


Yeah i agree that is a bit strange xD i do like psychopaths, the most interesting type of character in my opinion. I don't think he looks quite while killing onnocent people though 0.o though i would rather he did it, because it really gets across his character in a powerful kind of way, was totally necessary but not "cute" >.>

I like his sense of worth as well, how peoples worth should be measured on their will and so he helps them bring their will to fruition, even with the sybil system in place and of course he comes out totally unscathed :)
jimbob1141Mar 8, 2013 5:17 PM
Does anyone else need a doctor to confirm that someone without a head is dead?
Mar 8, 2013 3:12 PM
Offline
Jul 2012
4827
Akane's development from turning into a shy hesitant girl into a badass... I love akane <3
Mar 8, 2013 3:35 PM

Offline
Jul 2012
48248
The sudden character development from Akane was too abrupt and had no build up. Her badassery was pretty cool though. Psycho-pass needs moar detective and mystery.
Mar 8, 2013 3:40 PM

Offline
Jun 2008
15842
You know Akane may justify her position with peace excuses but it's clear that she also kind of likes how she was favorite in this kind of society. Of course she likes the current system, is a system that gave her everything. It might even be subconsciously but that affects her way of seeing the system.

Btw i find it kind of funny that such a system and people like Akane are in Japan since Japan even today is quite famous from being a very gremlin like society that can be very effective at times but kills free spirit.
Mar 8, 2013 4:01 PM
Offline
Mar 2013
2
I'm new here. So anyway, can anybody feel that the anime is ending? The story plot and the climax of Makishima vs. Kogami fight seems to be coming in fast. I don't want it to end though. This anime became my favorite since episode 1 because of it's realistic story.
Mar 8, 2013 4:44 PM

Offline
Jul 2010
2835
Akane taking charge, way to go!

I wonder if Kougami is in time to catch Makishima at the granary.

Mar 8, 2013 5:07 PM

Offline
Sep 2012
4013
bakuramariks said:
Linkark07 said:
Am I the only one that wants Makishima to win?


Nope. I wanna see everything going to hell because in my life, i've never seen a show where the "bad" wins. It will be truly something awesome for me to see, though i doubt it'll happen.


You mean like
Mar 8, 2013 5:12 PM

Offline
Feb 2009
335
Psycho-Pass you never cease to amaze me.
Mar 8, 2013 6:40 PM

Offline
Nov 2012
250
i have feelings akane will die. noooo :_:
Your so-called peaceful world makes me bored, so don't blame me if I destroy all of it.
- http://worldinverse.smackjeeves.com
Mar 8, 2013 7:00 PM

Offline
Feb 2012
178
I actually find myself kinda agreeing with the system. If a persons threat to society has been neutralized, there is no need for further punishment. In fact, punishment for the sake of punishment has been proven to not work - look no farther than the insanely high prison population in the US.

If these criminals no longer pose a threat to society, and are in fact enhancing it, then there is no need for punishment. Prison is a place to put people to *prevent* them from doing further damage to society, not to punish them.
Kellhus said:

GuusWayne said:
there is a limit to the suspension of disbelief

And it's the fan that did it. Not the smoking porn reading rubik cube genius rape ape with a magic boat.
Mar 8, 2013 7:33 PM

Offline
Nov 2012
250
really wondering who is the bad guy here.. oh my God this anime is really epic! I'm gonna be lonely when it ends ;_;

akaneee! totally love you >_<
Your so-called peaceful world makes me bored, so don't blame me if I destroy all of it.
- http://worldinverse.smackjeeves.com
Mar 8, 2013 8:00 PM

Offline
Feb 2012
1918
Litrydow said:
bakuramariks said:
Linkark07 said:
Am I the only one that wants Makishima to win?


Nope. I wanna see everything going to hell because in my life, i've never seen a show where the "bad" wins. It will be truly something awesome for me to see, though i doubt it'll happen.


You mean like


You don't get how spoiler tags work, do you?
Mar 8, 2013 10:04 PM
Offline
Jan 2013
7
Best episode ever!!! I got soooo excited!!!!
Seriously, I love this anime.

Makishima's smile is so scary...

Akane got to be very strong!!
Mar 8, 2013 10:09 PM

Offline
Jun 2010
3696
Should've just destroyed the Sibyl System right there. Damn Akane. Sigh.
Mar 8, 2013 10:47 PM
Offline
Nov 2010
3431
-MgZ_ said:
Should've just destroyed the Sibyl System right there. Damn Akane. Sigh.
And then people would panic and start destroying everything. Bringing chaos and disorder to the society.

It would simply repeat what happened last time during the anti-sibyl mask arc.
Mar 8, 2013 10:47 PM

Offline
Apr 2011
870
hazimechan said:

Makishima's smile is so scary...

Mar 8, 2013 11:56 PM
Offline
Mar 2010
3041
Danielcook said:
SleepyBear said:
Wonder how they're gonna wrap this up in 2 episodes...


Cliffhanger ending anyone?

Makashima spontaneously disapears along with Kogami?


that might leave a possibility for a second season.
Check out the News Club for daily rankings, discussion on future CD and BD releases, manga and novels. New members are welcome!
Mar 9, 2013 12:26 AM

Offline
Sep 2012
445
completly addicted to this show,
great to see yayoi's face again,
Mar 9, 2013 1:23 AM

Offline
Dec 2012
63
bakuramariks said:
danmari said:
...


Of course i know they weren't directed at me. Why do you think that?
I just found it really shocking to see people who can't comprehend why some people may like psychopaths.


And exactly WHO said 'anyone' didn't understand that...?? Clearly, the person who is not understanding something is you. I didn't say anything about people not enjoying the psychopaths. The fact that you (and others who) feel that way recognizes these characters for who/what they are is not what our (me, danmari, and michira) freakin' dialogue was about.

I mean, seriously....the fact that you started off your comment w/ 'Some people simply loves him for being who he really is - a psychopath.' already proves you came playing in from complete wrong side of the field. And you mention it again, as stated in the quoted comment above, even though you 'claim' to know it wasn't directed at you (or people that think like you)...yet you still making the sam unrelated 'some people loving psychopaths' comments.

Well no shit, Sherlock--but that's NOT the group for 'some people' we were talking about. <_<

See, the 'other people' we were getting at are those blinded bishōnen fangirl/boy (hey if they roll that way too, I ain't leaving them) that don't see his character for what he really IS--as we've all stated, a socio/psychopath--and instead want to elevate him to some sort of 'hero/good guy' status simply b/c he's 'hawt'. All the while completing ignoring his true nature (which by no means is far from heroic or good guy).

While you may not have been on point w/ what we talking about, I do understand your point of view of you (or others that have similar ideas) of why you like his character--even though you know he's a psychopath. And you know what? There's nothing wrong w/ it at all. Why? Because you at least came w/ very logical and thought-out reason for your liking his character--it went beyond superficial.
Mar 9, 2013 2:42 AM
Offline
Feb 2013
623
MsDiva said:
bakuramariks said:
danmari said:
...


Of course i know they weren't directed at me. Why do you think that?
I just found it really shocking to see people who can't comprehend why some people may like psychopaths.


And exactly WHO said 'anyone' didn't understand that...?? Clearly, the person who is not understanding something is you. I didn't say anything about people not enjoying the psychopaths. The fact that you (and others who) feel that way recognizes these characters for who/what they are is not what our (me, danmari, and michira) freakin' dialogue was about.

I mean, seriously....the fact that you started off your comment w/ 'Some people simply loves him for being who he really is - a psychopath.' already proves you came playing in from complete wrong side of the field. And you mention it again, as stated in the quoted comment above, even though you 'claim' to know it wasn't directed at you (or people that think like you)...yet you still making the sam unrelated 'some people loving psychopaths' comments.

Well no shit, Sherlock--but that's NOT the group for 'some people' we were talking about. <_<

See, the 'other people' we were getting at are those blinded bishōnen fangirl/boy (hey if they roll that way too, I ain't leaving them) that don't see his character for what he really IS--as we've all stated, a socio/psychopath--and instead want to elevate him to some sort of 'hero/good guy' status simply b/c he's 'hawt'. All the while completing ignoring his true nature (which by no means is far from heroic or good guy).

While you may not have been on point w/ what we talking about, I do understand your point of view of you (or others that have similar ideas) of why you like his character--even though you know he's a psychopath. And you know what? There's nothing wrong w/ it at all. Why? Because you at least came w/ very logical and thought-out reason for your liking his character--it went beyond superficial.


Butting in here.

albeit he's a psychopath, and his actions itself are immoral, his stated goal and purpose isn't all that invalid. He makes some very poignant points, and is right in that the societal system he lives in, should be destroyed. He may be cruel, but in some respect, the sybil system is even far worse.
Mar 9, 2013 3:02 AM

Offline
Apr 2011
870
AnimageNeby said:

Butting in here.

albeit he's a psychopath, and his actions itself are immoral, his stated goal and purpose isn't all that invalid. He makes some very poignant points, and is right in that the societal system he lives in, should be destroyed. He may be cruel, but in some respect, the sybil system is even far worse.


That's what we all mean but somehow we're still arguing about it :|
Mar 9, 2013 3:50 AM

Offline
Jan 2011
2839
What Makishima is doing here is just pushing a "reset" button for Japan, he definitely has a point.
I wonder what Akane will do in the end, that will decide if I truly like her or not for me. She has been hit and miss-ish so far.
This was some major buildup, I can't wait for more.
I almost never read discussions after I made my post, if you want to reply PM me or post on my profile page.
Mar 9, 2013 7:59 AM

Offline
Jun 2012
2271
XartaX said:
I actually find myself kinda agreeing with the system. If a persons threat to society has been neutralized, there is no need for further punishment. In fact, punishment for the sake of punishment has been proven to not work - look no farther than the insanely high prison population in the US.

If these criminals no longer pose a threat to society, and are in fact enhancing it, then there is no need for punishment. Prison is a place to put people to *prevent* them from doing further damage to society, not to punish them.


I don't mean to sound rude, but have you been watching the show? there is more to it than the criminally asymptomatic people.

Or did you specifically mean you agree with that part of the system? if so, pardon my rudeness xD

Still, i don't agree with it. criminals judging if we pose a threat to society? no thanks. You can see by watching the show that their judgements are way off and cause people to suffer. I personally do not support sibyl, though i'm not blind i can see the good sides to :)
Does anyone else need a doctor to confirm that someone without a head is dead?
Mar 9, 2013 9:04 AM

Offline
Sep 2012
10121
A lot of talking in this episode but I think it drew out the reactions and come-around of Akane pretty well. The best scene is how the episode used flashbacks of people Akane cares about or minds deeply and their conversation to bring about the conflicts and struggles within Akane facing the shocking revelation of the truth of the Sibyl system.
So MAL finally starts locking news threads that are only a few weeks old?

I wonder where was the announcement of this change? Or we are seeing yet another case of changes made that impacted users but not communicated to them?

I wonder how long people would put up with this.

As much as I have a bunch of information to share about anime announced recently I cannot share it in news board, and the anime series is too disorganized and chaotic to share information except with people already interested in the particular series.
Mar 9, 2013 10:09 AM

Offline
Jul 2012
804
Boooooooooring!
I am falling, I am fading, I am drowning, help me to breathe.
Mar 9, 2013 10:11 AM

Offline
Feb 2012
178
jimbob1141 said:
XartaX said:
I actually find myself kinda agreeing with the system. If a persons threat to society has been neutralized, there is no need for further punishment. In fact, punishment for the sake of punishment has been proven to not work - look no farther than the insanely high prison population in the US.

If these criminals no longer pose a threat to society, and are in fact enhancing it, then there is no need for punishment. Prison is a place to put people to *prevent* them from doing further damage to society, not to punish them.


I don't mean to sound rude, but have you been watching the show? there is more to it than the criminally asymptomatic people.

Or did you specifically mean you agree with that part of the system? if so, pardon my rudeness xD

Still, i don't agree with it. criminals judging if we pose a threat to society? no thanks. You can see by watching the show that their judgements are way off and cause people to suffer. I personally do not support sibyl, though i'm not blind i can see the good sides to :)


1. Say you don't mean to be rude 2. be rude.

Welp, whatever.

I was simply referring to what teh sibyl system says during this episode, that the people among them who had performed criminal acts don't need to be punished, since they have a positive impact upon society now.

And of 'course the system has downsides, but from what I can see there are a lot fewer of them than in most societies today except for a few (like in Norway, which operates on a similar principle of reforming people rather than just letting them rot. Prison is mostly used on people who are dangerous to society in some way). Yes, some people have been shown to suffer, but it seems like a lot less than, say, in the US.

If you wish to punish someone who are no longer a danger to society, and is in fact helping it, you're simply acting upon your own selfishness and the one who is ACTUALLY a danger society is you - since you wish to deprive society of a positive element.
Kellhus said:

GuusWayne said:
there is a limit to the suspension of disbelief

And it's the fan that did it. Not the smoking porn reading rubik cube genius rape ape with a magic boat.
Mar 9, 2013 10:40 AM
Offline
Feb 2013
623
XartaX said:
jimbob1141 said:
XartaX said:
I actually find myself kinda agreeing with the system. If a persons threat to society has been neutralized, there is no need for further punishment. In fact, punishment for the sake of punishment has been proven to not work - look no farther than the insanely high prison population in the US.

If these criminals no longer pose a threat to society, and are in fact enhancing it, then there is no need for punishment. Prison is a place to put people to *prevent* them from doing further damage to society, not to punish them.


I don't mean to sound rude, but have you been watching the show? there is more to it than the criminally asymptomatic people.

Or did you specifically mean you agree with that part of the system? if so, pardon my rudeness xD

Still, i don't agree with it. criminals judging if we pose a threat to society? no thanks. You can see by watching the show that their judgements are way off and cause people to suffer. I personally do not support sibyl, though i'm not blind i can see the good sides to :)


1. Say you don't mean to be rude 2. be rude.

Welp, whatever.

I was simply referring to what teh sibyl system says during this episode, that the people among them who had performed criminal acts don't need to be punished, since they have a positive impact upon society now.

And of 'course the system has downsides, but from what I can see there are a lot fewer of them than in most societies today except for a few (like in Norway, which operates on a similar principle of reforming people rather than just letting them rot. Prison is mostly used on people who are dangerous to society in some way). Yes, some people have been shown to suffer, but it seems like a lot less than, say, in the US.

If you wish to punish someone who are no longer a danger to society, and is in fact helping it, you're simply acting upon your own selfishness and the one who is ACTUALLY a danger society is you - since you wish to deprive society of a positive element.


Even if one would agree with that premise, who is to judge that the 'merits' outweigh the 'suffering' caused in the past? The Sybil system itself? How can one be impartial when judging oneself? Is there any possibility the Sybil system would decide against it's own survival and shut itself down? I think not. The problem, thus, not only lays in the concept itself, but also in the underlying assumption that someone can play judge, jury and executioner at the same time, even on and of itself. "Who will judge the judges?"

Furthermore, a poignant indicator of immorality is whether or not one is hypocritical. The Sybil system is plenty that: it portrays itself as being completely impartial and neutral, calculations made by a machine, but in reality is made by humans. It wants people to follow the rules, but has no quarrel breaking it's own rules (as with the overriding the denominator). It makes judgements about others when they break the rules, though deem themselves out of judgement when doing the same. (As Akana said: how convenient!).

Thus, once you can start doubting the alleged neutrality and 'benefits' they deliver, what is left? Basically, they try to remain in power, make people into obedient sheep, and try to put themselves above the law. That doesn't seem all that ethical to me, on the contrary. Though his actions are repulsive, in the matter at hand, on itself, Makishima is right: free will has been stripped from humanity (in Japan) to a very high degree, and the Sybil system is flawed while it pretence to be perfect. The Sybil system, for all it's worth, is presuming the infallibility of the pope or royalty in earlier times: that they know best, that they are above the law, and that they can govern and judge others, while no-one can govern and judge them. A recipe for disaster. Even with all the capacity and power of the Sybil system: power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And The Sybil system, in the future of the anime shown, is the closest thing that can come to absolute power. In fact, it has been hinted at earlier: they have a God-complex.
Mar 9, 2013 11:12 AM

Offline
Feb 2012
178
Once again missing my entire point, which is that the suffering in the past is inconsequential if it is not going to occur again - if the likelihood of repeat occurance is low. The "weight" of the "suffering of the past" is zero, nilch. The thing you have to weight it against is the suffering that can be caused in the future. Since this show likes to use quotes so much: “To err is human; to forgive, divine.” It's not the past that matters, it's the future (although you can obviously LEARN from the past).

Obviously if sibyl has a negative impact upon society as a whole it has to be dealt with - but the show thus far clearly show it doesn't (although it might clash with your normal sense of what's right and wrong in some of it's actions. But if you dig deeper, all societies do, really). Although there have been shown to be occurances of what we'd perceive as injustice, there also seems to be a lot less of it than today from what we've been shown. The rest of society lives in a relative utopian environment.

And if we're to follow it's logic then it IS likely that the system would shut itself down if it judged itself to be a threat to society. From what I've gathered the "brains" 1. aren't the system as a whole, they are just supporting it, being used to process tasks in parallell. Which leads to 2. Brains are being used, yes, but there is a computer framework at the bottom of the system from what I understood. 3. they seem to lose their sense of self - even if they claim otherwise (like Kasei did). If not, I doubt they would want Makishima in there. It's obvious they think he will submit and "join" them once he's "integrated".

It overrode the dominator because Kagari was precisely judged to be a threat to stability of society in a neutral fashion. Like I said the brains seem to be a part of a system that is built upon a computer. As far as I know no members of Sibyl have been shown to hate Kagari personally for any reason (<- that is my fashion for neutrality. For it not to be neutral, the Sibyl system must've had a personal reason to want him dead). Heck, all of this was explained this episode.

You can't really view the members of Sibyl as normal human beings anymore. Their "rule" doesn't bring them any benefits. No glory, no place in history - all anyone will remember is the Sibyl system, not Kasei or anyone else. So what if they have a personal god complex? If it is of benefit to society, then that is what's important.

2cents

Mod edit: removed flame bait sentence
koleareMar 10, 2013 1:06 PM
Kellhus said:

GuusWayne said:
there is a limit to the suspension of disbelief

And it's the fan that did it. Not the smoking porn reading rubik cube genius rape ape with a magic boat.
Mar 9, 2013 11:21 AM

Offline
Sep 2012
10121
@XartaX I think you have made some very good points about the validity and benefits the Sybil system serves the current society (which is clearly why Akane found it so hard not to help the system get Makishima). One thing though - I have a feeling that they do not lose their sense of self when doing their job, at least according to what I understand from what Kasei said, but what this episode told us is that it does NOT matter if they all think with their own mind (with a lot of them being deeply criminal) because the judgement of the system is taken as a whole, and those (criminal) irregulars serve to improve the reliability as well as potential of evolution and development for the system. It seems that the system is not a simple majority voting by those (criminal) brains but a much more complex one, and the irregulars serve more to stabilize the result and improve its scope.
So MAL finally starts locking news threads that are only a few weeks old?

I wonder where was the announcement of this change? Or we are seeing yet another case of changes made that impacted users but not communicated to them?

I wonder how long people would put up with this.

As much as I have a bunch of information to share about anime announced recently I cannot share it in news board, and the anime series is too disorganized and chaotic to share information except with people already interested in the particular series.
Mar 9, 2013 11:32 AM

Offline
Jun 2012
2271
XartaX said:
jimbob1141 said:
XartaX said:
I actually find myself kinda agreeing with the system. If a persons threat to society has been neutralized, there is no need for further punishment. In fact, punishment for the sake of punishment has been proven to not work - look no farther than the insanely high prison population in the US.

If these criminals no longer pose a threat to society, and are in fact enhancing it, then there is no need for punishment. Prison is a place to put people to *prevent* them from doing further damage to society, not to punish them.


I don't mean to sound rude, but have you been watching the show? there is more to it than the criminally asymptomatic people.

Or did you specifically mean you agree with that part of the system? if so, pardon my rudeness xD

Still, i don't agree with it. criminals judging if we pose a threat to society? no thanks. You can see by watching the show that their judgements are way off and cause people to suffer. I personally do not support sibyl, though i'm not blind i can see the good sides to :)


1. Say you don't mean to be rude 2. be rude.

Welp, whatever.

I was simply referring to what teh sibyl system says during this episode, that the people among them who had performed criminal acts don't need to be punished, since they have a positive impact upon society now.

And of 'course the system has downsides, but from what I can see there are a lot fewer of them than in most societies today except for a few (like in Norway, which operates on a similar principle of reforming people rather than just letting them rot. Prison is mostly used on people who are dangerous to society in some way). Yes, some people have been shown to suffer, but it seems like a lot less than, say, in the US.

If you wish to punish someone who are no longer a danger to society, and is in fact helping it, you're simply acting upon your own selfishness and the one who is ACTUALLY a danger society is you - since you wish to deprive society of a positive element.


I wasn't really being rude, it seemed as though you missed all the down sides of it, so i was simply asking if you have actually been watching because they are so blatantly put across but it seems you do fully see the down sides of it.

I never said they should be punished, i just don't think they should have the right to be judging people like that. Instead innocent people are suffering because they love something a lot? is that really better? I do not wish to deprive society of a positive element, i just think people should be entitled to do their hobbies however much they like without being sent to prison, is that so wrong?

It does have the good sides of assigning jobs and that, but it leaves humans with no ambition and we become sort of like robots just doing as we're told. and anyone who does wish to go after their ambition will be sent to jail, that isn't the sort of society i would like to live in to be honest.
Does anyone else need a doctor to confirm that someone without a head is dead?
Mar 9, 2013 12:42 PM

Offline
Feb 2012
178
symbv said:
@XartaX I think you have made some very good points about the validity and benefits the Sybil system serves the current society (which is clearly why Akane found it so hard not to help the system get Makishima). One thing though - I have a feeling that they do not lose their sense of self when doing their job, at least according to what I understand from what Kasei said, but what this episode told us is that it does NOT matter if they all think with their own mind (with a lot of them being deeply criminal) because the judgement of the system is taken as a whole, and those (criminal) irregulars serve to improve the reliability as well as potential of evolution and development for the system. It seems that the system is not a simple majority voting by those (criminal) brains but a much more complex one, and the irregulars serve more to stabilize the result and improve its scope.


Well, they obviously have an identity of sorts. But the reason I say they kinda lose themselves, is because.. well, they comply with the system once they join it. Surely there must be someone kind of similar to Makishima in there? There are hundreds of people like him in there, but not a single one is fighting against the system once they're in there (unless it turns out that someone in there is actually plotting against it by convincing it to share info with Akane, etc. That could actually be a thing), and obviously they think Makishima will follow suit once he's among them. That's why I'm saying they're kinda losing themselves. Sure, they still identify them as themselves, but they've been.. domesticated?

jimbob1141 said:
XartaX said:
jimbob1141 said:
XartaX said:
I actually find myself kinda agreeing with the system. If a persons threat to society has been neutralized, there is no need for further punishment. In fact, punishment for the sake of punishment has been proven to not work - look no farther than the insanely high prison population in the US.

If these criminals no longer pose a threat to society, and are in fact enhancing it, then there is no need for punishment. Prison is a place to put people to *prevent* them from doing further damage to society, not to punish them.


I don't mean to sound rude, but have you been watching the show? there is more to it than the criminally asymptomatic people.

Or did you specifically mean you agree with that part of the system? if so, pardon my rudeness xD

Still, i don't agree with it. criminals judging if we pose a threat to society? no thanks. You can see by watching the show that their judgements are way off and cause people to suffer. I personally do not support sibyl, though i'm not blind i can see the good sides to :)


1. Say you don't mean to be rude 2. be rude.

Welp, whatever.

I was simply referring to what teh sibyl system says during this episode, that the people among them who had performed criminal acts don't need to be punished, since they have a positive impact upon society now.

And of 'course the system has downsides, but from what I can see there are a lot fewer of them than in most societies today except for a few (like in Norway, which operates on a similar principle of reforming people rather than just letting them rot. Prison is mostly used on people who are dangerous to society in some way). Yes, some people have been shown to suffer, but it seems like a lot less than, say, in the US.

If you wish to punish someone who are no longer a danger to society, and is in fact helping it, you're simply acting upon your own selfishness and the one who is ACTUALLY a danger society is you - since you wish to deprive society of a positive element.


I wasn't really being rude, it seemed as though you missed all the down sides of it, so i was simply asking if you have actually been watching because they are so blatantly put across but it seems you do fully see the down sides of it.

I never said they should be punished, i just don't think they should have the right to be judging people like that. Instead innocent people are suffering because they love something a lot? is that really better? I do not wish to deprive society of a positive element, i just think people should be entitled to do their hobbies however much they like without being sent to prison, is that so wrong?

It does have the good sides of assigning jobs and that, but it leaves humans with no ambition and we become sort of like robots just doing as we're told. and anyone who does wish to go after their ambition will be sent to jail, that isn't the sort of society i would like to live in to be honest.


Exactly where did I say that? I've constantly been saying that all systems have downsides, you just have to weigh the upsides against the downsides. And from the beginning I was only saying I kind of agreed with a certain assessment made by the system, not that I think it's the perfect form of government (but it sure seems better than a lot of governments today). "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." Of 'course, this is all assuming reality would turn out like it did in the anime - which is highly unlikely.

And yes, if that hobby damages society, then they shouldn't be allowed to keep doing it. That's why we ban e.g. CP. However if it causes no damage to society, then they should be allowed to keep doing it.

I haven't really seen anyone being sent to jail just for doing another job than the system tells them to? The closest thing would be those musicians who were "nonapproved", but as far as I gathered it wasn't illegal, it was just kinda underground.

Also by "you" I don't mean you personally (referring to my last paragraph in my response to you), the word can be used in another way as well... Substitute it with "someone" and it has the exact same meaning.
XartaXMar 9, 2013 12:48 PM
Kellhus said:

GuusWayne said:
there is a limit to the suspension of disbelief

And it's the fan that did it. Not the smoking porn reading rubik cube genius rape ape with a magic boat.
Mar 9, 2013 2:28 PM
Offline
Jul 2012
9405
This episode is confusing.
So the shibi system killed Kogami for what? Can someone tell me the shibi information again? I'm lost here.
Akane seems to be smart yet again. Solving crimes the good way.
Kogami join forces with Shogo on destroying the food source. Wow the tense is here!
Next episode will be crazy and suspenseful.
4/5
Mar 9, 2013 2:53 PM
Offline
Feb 2013
623
XartaX said:
Once again missing my entire point, which is that the suffering in the past is inconsequential if it is not going to occur again - if the likelihood of repeat occurance is low. The "weight" of the "suffering of the past" is zero, nilch. The thing you have to weight it against is the suffering that can be caused in the future. Since this show likes to use quotes so much: “To err is human; to forgive, divine.” It's not the past that matters, it's the future (although you can obviously LEARN from the past).

Obviously if sibyl has a negative impact upon society as a whole it has to be dealt with - but the show thus far clearly show it doesn't (although it might clash with your normal sense of what's right and wrong in some of it's actions. But if you dig deeper, all societies do, really). Although there have been shown to be occurances of what we'd perceive as injustice, there also seems to be a lot less of it than today from what we've been shown. The rest of society lives in a relative utopian environment.

And if we're to follow it's logic then it IS likely that the system would shut itself down if it judged itself to be a threat to society. From what I've gathered the "brains" 1. aren't the system as a whole, they are just supporting it, being used to process tasks in parallell. Which leads to 2. Brains are being used, yes, but there is a computer framework at the bottom of the system from what I understood. 3. they seem to lose their sense of self - even if they claim otherwise (like Kasei did). If not, I doubt they would want Makishima in there. It's obvious they think he will submit and "join" them once he's "integrated".

It overrode the dominator because Kagari was precisely judged to be a threat to stability of society in a neutral fashion. Like I said the brains seem to be a part of a system that is built upon a computer. As far as I know no members of Sibyl have been shown to hate Kagari personally for any reason (<- that is my fashion for neutrality. For it not to be neutral, the Sibyl system must've had a personal reason to want him dead). Heck, all of this was explained this episode.

You can't really view the members of Sibyl as normal human beings anymore. Their "rule" doesn't bring them any benefits. No glory, no place in history - all anyone will remember is the Sibyl system, not Kasei or anyone else. So what if they have a personal god complex? If it is of benefit to society, then that is what's important.

2cents

I feel that it's you who is missing the point. Yes, we could keep going on in this matter, so don't bother bringing this up again; arguing who it is that doesn't get 'the point' is rather futile on itself. I'd rather concentrate on the arguments given.

1) The past is not irrelevant to the future; you already came back on that yourself with your last sentence. Not only can you learn from your past, but you also never get completely rid of it neither. Which individual, and which society, would exist without it's past/history? Saying that only the future is important, is a nice soundbite, but doesn't *actually* work that way in any human society - and the one depicted in the anime is still human. If you feel I'm wrong, please point out a society/person who isn't influenced by it's past. It's an impossibility.

2)The argument I gave wasn't even about the past and what it means for the future. The fact that they did wrong in the past is merely stated as such: a fact. They judge others and lock them up or even kill them because they are breaking the law. They do NOT have to endanger society as a whole for that, no, breaking the law or doing immoral things are enough. Heck, even a high enough scan is enough. Yet, while they condemn others for that and punish them accordingly, they do not punish their own members for the same acts. How is that logical? You argue: but that's in the past. Well, it could be in the past for others as well; how would they know? They are NOT omniscient nor omnipotent, though they seem to have the delusion they are.

3) Which is the whole point of the debate: they are NOT morally superior to other people. The Sybil system is a network of human brains, and while it claims that the different viewpoints and quirks cancel eachother out and leads to neutrality and objectivity, it is and remains human. Which means, it still has the same basic deficiencies as a humans'. One of which is the fact that power corrupts, and they have an extra-ordinary amount of power in that society.

The lack of neutrality can already be noted in the explanation and behaviour we've already seen; clearly they had a God-complex. How is that delusion possible, if they were neutral and objective? That they are truly 'superior' in a moral or ethical sense has nowhere been established, on the contrary, it is implied that they aren't, even if they claim to be when it suits them. If they have no stance of a complete objective judgemental power, however, than all what they say based on that tenet lack validity. This is only logical.

4) Their logic fails in the department of reciprocity. If you argument something, the argument must be able to be applied to themselves too. However, what we see here is one party judging another for certain actions, but the actions they did and do are not judged in kind. Thus, the basic premise they use, is that the laws and rules they make, is only valid *for others*, but not for themselves. However, if your stance begins with the premise of some inherent 'uniqueness' which makes your own rules invalid for yourself, than no logic can be applied, apart from following reciprocity, and thus, another party can claim the same too; that every argument they use is for others to abide, but not for themselves. Therefore, if the Sybil system can claim this on these grounds - being an exception, so can Makishima, and, in fact, all others who feel they are special. Ofcourse, being of the opinion one is above all judgement, and yes, even if one WERE truly exceptional: this is not deemed enough to be excluded from laws, legal punishment and certainly not moral judgement. Even today we have psychopathic serialkillers who think they are special, that they are morally superior, that they are God, that they are smarter than the rest, etc. But what is that opinion worth, if it's coming from the subject in question? Nothing. EVEN if it were true, and such person had the highest IQ and amazing abilities: he still wouldn't be regarded as being above the law and excluded from punishment because of that, and if one would, it would generally be conceived as being unjust - and rightfully so. And even if one would hold to the hypothesis such a man would deserve to 'not be punished' if he wouldn't kill anymore because of his worth to society, than it still would have to be society who decides on that, NOT he himself. Alas, no-one judges the Sybil system apart from Sybil itself (if it even does that, as a whole).

Seen the fact such 'worth' is subjective, and what is best for society is also arbitrarily chosen, one can not else than conclude the whole concept is borked. If Sybil can judge itself, than so can someone else for himself too, such as Makishima. Which is, in fact, exactly as he does. Therefore, if one finds the actions of Makishima vile/amoral, the same can be said for Sybil. Vice versa; if the sybil system is claimed to be 'right', than Makishima is equally 'right'. Without any measurement except ones' own judgement about oneself all are equally in 'their right'. The stance of Sybil that only they have that right because of their networking capacity of many different minds, is, ultimately, an unproven and self-serving claim, which is highly subjective in the premise it starts with, namely that they know what is best for society. Well, that would depend on what 'society' actually wants, no? Well, then, why are they not open about it, and let 'society' decide if they want to keep the system, just like they did with Akane? Because - as you well know - the sybil system wouldn't survive it: people would not want to be ruled by such a system if they knew at it's core it was fallible human judgement that makes the calls (this was directly stated in the anime as such too, btw). Ergo: they don't want 'society' to decide their own future, they want to protect their own system and their own vision of what society should be.

But, as you point out yourself, Sybil is not 'society'. Society is the conglomerate of all individuals living in a social-hierarchic unity. The only way to ascertain for Sybil the right to speak in name of 'society' and which is best for society, thus, would be if all individuals of that society were in the Sybil system, and could judge the worth of it. Apart from that, the next best thing is to let people vote on it, and thus have democratic input on the matter.

As long as that is not the case, the claim of Sybil that it can speak for society as a whole, is worthless. And thus, so is their claim they can decide that the 'contributions' to society they make validate no punishment. If they think killing someone - even by breaking the law - is necessary because it's the easiest way to protect their identity, then, so can anyone else. If they feel it's important enough to murder for, they shouldn't be punishing others that think THEIR identity is at stake and kill others for it. Again, we see the contradiction and hypocrisy there.


5)Their claim that they do not have to be punished like they punish others, because they are valuable, is ultimately self-serving, surely you can see that? Even in the best of cases, logic would dictate that it's impossible to know whether this claim is actually true or not, since those judging about the 'worth to society' are the same as those that have to be judged. Contrary to you, I find it very doubtful that they would judge themselves like that, ever. Because whatever they do, protecting the Sybil system (and thus themselves) would be akin as protecting 'society' as a whole in their own eyes, even if one would consider them to be sincere. Maybe they actually believe that, but of course, this is also delusional and a circular reasoning. It still boils down on what THEY think is best for society, hence, it is subjective, because there is no objective measure of what is 'best' for society. Ergo, it's also interminable in an objective manner, if some past wrongs are to be ignored because of some perceived benefits of an ideal image they themselves created of how a society should be.

Mod edit: removed off-topic
AnimageNebyMar 10, 2013 1:36 PM
Mar 9, 2013 3:26 PM

Offline
Feb 2012
178
I also never said the past wasn't important (anyone with any kind of functional brain could understand that from my statement "Obviously you can LEARN from the past").

In addition, the example you bring up with cymatic scan is the perfect example of what I mean, it assesses the likelihood of the subject performing criminal acts in the FUTURE. Hence the whole "threat to society" point. This society doesn't judge people for what they have done at all, only for what they will possibly do in the future. Of 'course past actions can MAKE them a threat in the future as well, as when someone snap and perform a criminal action the likelihood of them doing it again in the future is usually high. If someone gets put into the reform facilities here after being tazed, and then their coefficient goes down again, they're released. This is demonstrated very clearly in the anime.

Mod edit: removed off-topic content
koleareMar 10, 2013 1:56 PM
Kellhus said:

GuusWayne said:
there is a limit to the suspension of disbelief

And it's the fan that did it. Not the smoking porn reading rubik cube genius rape ape with a magic boat.
Mar 9, 2013 4:29 PM
Offline
Feb 2013
623
XartaX said:
I also never said the past wasn't important (anyone with any kind of functional brain could understand that from my statement "Obviously you can LEARN from the past").

In addition, the example you bring up with cymatic scan is the perfect example of what I mean, it assesses the likelihood of the subject performing criminal acts in the FUTURE. Hence the whole "threat to society" point. This society doesn't judge people for what they have done at all, only for what they will possibly do in the future. Of 'course past actions can MAKE them a threat in the future as well, as when someone snap and perform a criminal action the likelihood of them doing it again in the future is usually high. If someone gets put into the reform facilities here after being tazed, and then their coefficient goes down again, they're released. This is demonstrated very clearly in the anime.



Note that I didn't say that you said the past wasn't important; in fact, it was exactly why I said you already came back on it yourself. However, the point was, that one not only learns from the past, but that no-one can completely get rid of the influences of his past, whether he learns from it or not. And neither can a society of its history.

Concerning the dominator: what we ALSO saw is that the scan misjudges; that above 300 is deemed irreversible, and punishable by death, yet - as we saw with the girl in the beginning - it turns out that she came back to normal degrees too. If not for akane, the girl would be dead, as a 'just' measure of Sybil. Point being: the Sybil system clearly makes mistakes, is fallible, and tries to cover up its tracks. This is also very clearly demonstrated in the anime. Thus, contrary to their arrogance of omniscience and omnipotence, they are in fact not, and thus, their validity to make 'neutral and objective' judgements about things are prone to flaws too; they are neither all that neutral nor objective. What you get then, is a system that murders to keep it's identity secret; which doesn't follow it's own laws, and in fact considers its own members above any law, due to the self-serving 'explanation' that they are too valuable for society. And who decides about that? Well, they do. As Akane said: how convenient. However, it is logically untenable to judge whether something is valuable for society without a frame of reference of what that society should be. Clearly, the fact they don't want to divulge their own identity in judging and controlling that society TO that society already indicates they don't can't talk in name of 'society' (and hence, also not what is 'best' for society). The Sybil system is NOT society as a whole, obviously . While our democratic governments aren't all that fantastic neither, at least they have one profound advantage; they are 'checked', at least to some degree, by the people they proclaim to represent. This is not the case of the Sybil system, thus their claim that they do (or have the right to do) as they do 'for the betterment of society' is incorrect and misleading.

Mod edit: removed off-topic content
AnimageNebyMar 10, 2013 1:51 PM
Mar 10, 2013 4:53 AM
Offline
Feb 2013
623
This episode is confusing.
So the shibi system killed Kogami for what? Can someone tell me the shibi information again? I'm lost here.


Chibi-system? ;-)

It killed Kogami to cover its own tracks. It broke the law by doing that. So, basically, they are not punishing former members for their past deeds, but also current illegal actions aren't punished. That's why it is hypocritical, and thus their explanation dubious and self-serving at best. If someone else would murder someone to protect their identity, they would sentence him, probably even to death. If they do it, it's all right, because according to their own viewpoint, such a member is of more value for society. It's a judgemental system that is not equal for all, thus. And not surprisingly, the exceptions to it are those who judge. Nothing new there, in essence: Tyrants, kings and dictators have been doing the same throughout history. With the same excuse often: that they know best, and that their worth is more important than that of others.

Mod edit: removed off-topic
koleareMar 10, 2013 12:58 PM
Mar 10, 2013 8:22 AM

Offline
Sep 2012
10121
XartaX said:

Well, they obviously have an identity of sorts. But the reason I say they kinda lose themselves, is because.. well, they comply with the system once they join it. Surely there must be someone kind of similar to Makishima in there? There are hundreds of people like him in there, but not a single one is fighting against the system once they're in there (unless it turns out that someone in there is actually plotting against it by convincing it to share info with Akane, etc. That could actually be a thing), and obviously they think Makishima will follow suit once he's among them. That's why I'm saying they're kinda losing themselves. Sure, they still identify them as themselves, but they've been.. domesticated?
Domesticated? I like this word. I think this is what the Sybil system expects will happen to Makishima once he joins, and given serial killer like the plastication murderer is already tamed and made to serve the system indicates that it can indeed work. However, for me the fact that those guys keep their memory and lack of regret over what they did when they come out of the system to "rest" as individual (e.g. Kasei) is kind of worrying. I wonder what prevents those criminals from doing criminal things once they are in the body of Kasei, separate from the system.

@AnimageNeby

Some of your 5 points are specific to your debate history with XartaX and so we could leave that aside here. For the remaining points, I think your point of God-complex is of course there, as the plastication killer himself attested. As for your point of self-serving or lack of reciprocity, we can also say that this is an issue too, as the system clearly thinks it is superior and is the biggest factor that Japan as a country is stable and prosperous. However, I think XartaX's point is that regardless of those issues and the really annoyingly self-important and cold-hearted attitude the system is producing effective result in the society that it runs, and it may not be as bad as you may be making it of, using concept of moral, ethics and law that the modern democracy we are living now. At least this is what I understand by reading all the long posts you two have made.
So MAL finally starts locking news threads that are only a few weeks old?

I wonder where was the announcement of this change? Or we are seeing yet another case of changes made that impacted users but not communicated to them?

I wonder how long people would put up with this.

As much as I have a bunch of information to share about anime announced recently I cannot share it in news board, and the anime series is too disorganized and chaotic to share information except with people already interested in the particular series.
Mar 10, 2013 8:52 AM

Offline
Feb 2012
178
symbv said:
XartaX said:

Well, they obviously have an identity of sorts. But the reason I say they kinda lose themselves, is because.. well, they comply with the system once they join it. Surely there must be someone kind of similar to Makishima in there? There are hundreds of people like him in there, but not a single one is fighting against the system once they're in there (unless it turns out that someone in there is actually plotting against it by convincing it to share info with Akane, etc. That could actually be a thing), and obviously they think Makishima will follow suit once he's among them. That's why I'm saying they're kinda losing themselves. Sure, they still identify them as themselves, but they've been.. domesticated?
Domesticated? I like this word. I think this is what the Sybil system expects will happen to Makishima once he joins, and given serial killer like the plastication murderer is already tamed and made to serve the system indicates that it can indeed work. However, for me the fact that those guys keep their memory and lack of regret over what they did when they come out of the system to "rest" as individual (e.g. Kasei) is kind of worrying. I wonder what prevents those criminals from doing criminal things once they are in the body of Kasei, separate from the system.


If my theory is correct, it's not so much lack of regret as that they've been.. computerized (emotion has been removed from the "equation"). I don't know how to put it, but the system doesn't really seem to have a concept of right or wrong, more about order and disorder, efficiency and inefficiency, etc.

Seems like we have to wait and observe for a bit longer before we come to a definite conclusion. Like I said one possibility could actually be someone working inside the system to destroy it. Who knows. We need more information.

Mod edit: removed off-topic/baiting sentence
koleareMar 10, 2013 12:56 PM
Kellhus said:

GuusWayne said:
there is a limit to the suspension of disbelief

And it's the fan that did it. Not the smoking porn reading rubik cube genius rape ape with a magic boat.
Mar 10, 2013 9:50 AM

Offline
Jun 2012
2271
XartaX said:
Exactly where did I say that? I've constantly been saying that all systems have downsides, you just have to weigh the upsides against the downsides. And from the beginning I was only saying I kind of agreed with a certain assessment made by the system, not that I think it's the perfect form of government (but it sure seems better than a lot of governments today). "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." Of 'course, this is all assuming reality would turn out like it did in the anime - which is highly unlikely.

And yes, if that hobby damages society, then they shouldn't be allowed to keep doing it. That's why we ban e.g. CP. However if it causes no damage to society, then they should be allowed to keep doing it.

I haven't really seen anyone being sent to jail just for doing another job than the system tells them to? The closest thing would be those musicians who were "nonapproved", but as far as I gathered it wasn't illegal, it was just kinda underground.

Also by "you" I don't mean you personally (referring to my last paragraph in my response to you), the word can be used in another way as well... Substitute it with "someone" and it has the exact same meaning.


yeah i just jumped the gun a bit sorry about that. yayoi was sent to that place because of her love of music?

And when she pointed the dominator at the musician that wasn't assigned that job it said she was a target for enforcement. if i recall correctly the school girls dad was sent to "jail" for being an obsessive painter or artist, that isn't harming society, nor is playing in a band without being approved. your CC rising for playing in an unaproved band tells me that if you don't follow the system then your CC is gonna rise. All in all i personally don't like the system, of course it has its good points too but personally i think the bad out weighs the good. I would be in jail for sure as i'm fairly obsessive about my hobbies >.<

I imagine yayoi and that other musicians ambition was to have a career in music, which wasn't assigned to them which in turn caused their CC to rise which is mainly where i get the "going to jail for doing a different career" from. Humans aren't allowed ambitions under the sibyl system pretty much >.<

I know "you" doesn't necessarily mean me personally, but i was debating with you so i just took it that way :)

Mod edit: removed quote chain/tower
koleareMar 10, 2013 12:55 PM
Does anyone else need a doctor to confirm that someone without a head is dead?
Mar 10, 2013 10:12 AM

Offline
Feb 2012
178
jimbob1141 said:
yeah i just jumped the gun a bit sorry about that. yayoi was sent to that place because of her love of music?

And when she pointed the dominator at the musician that wasn't assigned that job it said she was a target for enforcement. if i recall correctly the school girls dad was sent to "jail" for being an obsessive painter or artist, that isn't harming society, nor is playing in a band without being approved. your CC rising for playing in an unaproved band tells me that if you don't follow the system then your CC is gonna rise. All in all i personally don't like the system, of course it has its good points too but personally i think the bad out weighs the good. I would be in jail for sure as i'm fairly obsessive about my hobbies >.<

I imagine yayoi and that other musicians ambition was to have a career in music, which wasn't assigned to them which in turn caused their CC to rise which is mainly where i get the "going to jail for doing a different career" from. Humans aren't allowed ambitions under the sibyl system pretty much >.<

I know "you" doesn't necessarily mean me personally, but i was debating with you so i just took it that way :)


No worries. IIRC she was sent there for other reasons. She was even approved of as an official musician by Sibyl. It was her friend that was an unofficial musician. The reason she was a target for enforcement, was because she was working with terrorists, not because she was an unofficial musician (remember the scene where they meet underground).

I don't think the painters dad was sent to prison. I think he went to one of those institution places where people who lost their "life spark" (for the lack of a better word. Those people who became completely apathetic that were shown in one episode). My memory isn't completely solid here, though.

So basically, in the case of the unofficial musician, her CC rose because of something else than being one. She was unsatisfied that she didn't get the recognition she felt she deserved, and started acting together with terrorists to bring down Sibyl - hence she was actively working against society, which caused her CC to rise. That's how I'm seeing it, at least.

You're right that it's not easy to do a different career than what Sibyl proposes for you, but it doesn't seem like it's completely impossible. Still, you can say that about todays society too in a way. If someone lacks talent in a field, they will not find success there unless they happen to be protected by something (say working under their parents or through their connections, etc.).

We're on the same page, then :)

Mod edit: removed quote chain/tower
koleareMar 10, 2013 12:53 PM
Kellhus said:

GuusWayne said:
there is a limit to the suspension of disbelief

And it's the fan that did it. Not the smoking porn reading rubik cube genius rape ape with a magic boat.
Mar 10, 2013 10:54 AM
Offline
May 2012
3087
newnar said:
Kasei is just a pawn of Sybil. In fact Kasei's body is a ROBOT. That robot swaps controllers every now and then, how can you be sure it was Kasei who killed Kagari. It was Sybil as a whole, not one mind's decision. Sybil already said that they only make decisions as a combined intellectual, not individual.


Continued:-

I mean was expecting that Chief Kasei (Touma) suddenly shows up in the Sibyl System & tries to kill Akane.

phoenixalia said:
Danielcook said:
SleepyBear said:
Wonder how they're gonna wrap this up in 2 episodes...


Cliffhanger ending anyone?

Makashima spontaneously disapears along with Kogami?


that might leave a possibility for a second season.


I wonder what's next for that old hag Kasei I mean Touma. Great, I couldn't care less about Makishima since it's only 2 episodes left.
JafriZinMar 10, 2013 11:03 AM
Mar 10, 2013 11:53 AM

Offline
Sep 2012
313
Really loved this ep. That part with Akane having her flashbacks especially. This is building up fairly well. Can't wait for next weeks ep.
Mar 10, 2013 1:07 PM

Offline
Aug 2010
2344
Cleaned

Removed flame baiting, off-topic and spam content.

Please keep discussions on-topic and be civil.
Pages (6) « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » ... Last »

More topics from this board

Poll: » Psycho-Pass Episode 22 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Mar 21, 2013

928 by EndSh0t »»
Apr 23, 6:11 AM

Poll: » Psycho-Pass Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Jan 10, 2013

329 by Saww_Duss »»
Apr 22, 3:30 PM

Poll: » Psycho-Pass Episode 18 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Feb 21, 2013

273 by ANIk_003 »»
Mar 7, 7:25 AM

Poll: » Psycho-Pass Episode 21 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Mar 14, 2013

352 by The_Black_B3ast »»
Mar 4, 2:49 PM

Poll: » Psycho-Pass Episode 17 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Feb 14, 2013

373 by The_Black_B3ast »»
Feb 29, 3:21 AM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login