I'd say let it die already...

Just move on in your life and let others enjoy what they enjoy

I don't think they ruined the series with the movie as it was in an alternate timeline and i personally liked it but as for this project i have no interest

It's a product. They'll keep milking as long as it makes money.

Now it's time for Celouch - Code Geass Next Generation.

@_Zanga
Didn't know it was an alternate timeline! Still didn't like the movie at all.

Yea there are 3 recap movies which are slightly different from the original series( Like how in the movies Shirley didn't die). Lelouch of the Resurrection is a continuation of that timeline

Please have any semblance of an idea of what you're talking about next time yeah?

No, they did not. Perhaps you dislike the movie but it has no relation whatsoever with the original show. As long as they don't mess with the original series, I'm totally fine with it.

always a good idea to judge a product years before its released. we are all very smart and discerning consumers.

@HikarieChan
I'm not gonna stop expressing my opinion just because there are pathetic losers out there who think they can't enjoy things without everyone's approval.

@dumbeidiote

You don't seem so smart yourself, because no one here is judging a product before its release, we're only criticizing a corporate for milking a great series that had a perfect ending.

@ELtaaaaaa
Since you stuck your nose and quote something I said as a reply to someone else, read my next reply to him, I'm not gonna repeat myself to you.

The trilogy doesn't really end at the third movie does it? The actual ending is in the resurrection movie. Also, their storyline might be similar but the fate of Shirley is significant enough to treat both of them as separate shows.

@DiabloMask
Damn that was aggressive , whatever makes you sleep at night bro

@DiabloMask almost like ur "criticizing" them on the grounds that uve judged the spinoff as worthless before its even out bro???? surely not?????

@DiabloMask You're still dumb...

@ELtaaaaaa
That's such a 7yo comeback lol.

@dumbeidiote
When did I judge this new series as worthless? That was never even brought up in this whole thread.

Like I said before, Shirley's death doesn't allow the resurrection movie to be treated as a sequel to the original series. Shirley dies in the original whereas she is shown to be living in the resurrection movie. That would be a huge contradiction if we treat the resurrection movie to be a direct sequel to the original series.

@DiabloMask Well you are though? Saying it ruins something it's different from. They're not the same canon or timeline or continuity. You're just hating with zero knowledge.

@DiabloMask ur being very obtuse to bait replies i see

@Alriven
Shirley being alive didn't change anything significant in the story, her added scenes could be deleted and no one would notice, it feels more like they made this change on a whim just to please some fans, they weren't intending for it to be an alternate ending all together.
You still say it's a significant enough change to treat this as an alternate universe, I respect your point of view, but I disagree, I still think the show was better off without this movie.

@ELtaaaaaa
It's funny that among the people having proper discussions about my critical points of view, every single thread needs a crybaby like you who only calls others names and spams the word "hating", thank you for fulfilling that role.

@dumbeidiote
I don't think you're stupid enough to not realize that I never made a single comment about this upcoming spin-off being good or bad, but yeah tell yourself that I was baiting you so you don't have to blame yourself for jumping into conclusions.

@HikarieChan
Calling me aggressive is such a perfect example on why I hate this "let people enjoy it" argument, it makes you come off as over sensitive.

@DiabloMask I explained my point and you can't properly respond lmao you're so fucking full of it. Fucking contrarian lmao...

@DiabloMask You sure talk too much lol , I'm not in the slightest bothered as much as you are , do what you want , again , whatever makes you sleep at night.

@DiabloMask
Shirley being alive changes everything. In the trilogy, just before Zero Requiem happens C.C. meets Shirley where she asks her to move Lelouch's body to Jeremiah's place after Zero has been killed.

So without Shirley --> Lelouch's body is not transferred to Jeremiah's place --> C.C. is not able to resurrect Lelouch --> No Lelouch of the Resurrection movie.

I'm sure I would raise an eyebrow if someone was shown to be dead and in the next episode they are shown alive without any explanation whatsoever. You've seen LOGH right so,

Regardless of what the creators intended to with the resurrection movie, it cannot be considered as a sequel to original series due to this huge contradiction. Either you can treat it as a sequel to the orginal show and pass it off as bad writing or treat it as an alternate universe as the dots connect with what's being shown in the movie trilogy and makes more sense to treat as such.

thank you for your opinion but it contributes 0 to anything.

"Sometimes it's better to just stay quiet, especially on a public forum. So, if you can have a productive conversation, it probably is worth sharing your opinion with others.

@DiabloMask if the literacy level you’re working at involves your original post not having any implications about the upcoming spin off (of which this is the forum page we are posting on) then i think your views have finally been explained

@Alriven

Talk about taking my words literally, obviously you can't call Resurrection a sequel to the original with Shirley in it, but from a writing standpoint you can easily replace her with any other character, she had no build up to earn that role.

@ELtaaaaaa
No you said nothing of value and only called me names.