What? What screenshots u even talking about lol. If you're talking about Gintama, that's because it was a Livestream, and all livestreams have shit quality.
If you're talking about the screenshots I have up on anime forums, those were taken from the stream I was getting of its Japanese TV broadcast, and the quality of the stream was poor. But I took those screenshots for any manga readers that were waiting for the subbed release and wanted to see screenshots of how the episode looked. Granted, it's not taken from a good stream, but any looks of the episode prior to its sub release was better than none (for some people, not all). I get better quality streams now though, through a paid service.
In short, my PC's fine. The stream quality was shit.
Huh, based on our previous message history, you do seem to have a problem with communicating and expressing yourself. So please be sure to take more time constructing comments on my page before you decide to post them~
yes i admit it, because i'm still trying to improve. So, although your comment seems impolite / uncivilized, thank you for reading my review ^0^.
basicly i am not mastering either in literatur or language, I'm not poetry, journalist, writer etc. I'm just audience who write review for:
1.sharing my impression and thought related to good anime
2.spreading facts about good anime
While I agree with half of what you're saying, I do think that both your opinion on what a review should be and the way you rate your shows are flat out wrong. A review should of course take into concideration objective things such as character development, directing and quality of art, but there are so many things that can effect your impression of a show to make an entirely objective review impossible. What if one person personally connects with a certain character or plot point which would increase that persons opinion of the show while another person doesn't connect the same way? Are they both right? Are they both wrong? Is one or the other correct? Both of them are of course right in their own opinion.
Now, as for the way you rate your shows. Giving everything a 10/10 is, as I've said previously, like giving everything a 1/10. A 10/10 means that the show is perfect with no flaws what so ever. If everything is flawless, then whats the point of even rating shows? You still haven't pointed out any examples of my "inconsistent" rating by the way.
Also, how the fuck can you, with a straight face, give Tales of Zestiria a 10/10. It lacks EVERYTHING you mentioned is important in a show. Zero character development. Awful directing. Incoherent story structure. Awful. Awful. Awful.
You make it seem like "good shit" and "bad shit" are objective terms while they're not? Please give me examples of good shit I've rated low and bad shit I've rated high and I'll gladly explain why those shows recieved those raitings. I could go on quite a bit about your rating actually. basically rating everything you've ever watched a 10 is like rating everything you've ever watched a 1, since there is no contrast to your opinions. I won't claim you have bad opinions, but I can't say I agree with them.
All Comments (36) Comments
In short, my PC's fine. The stream quality was shit.
And here:
Bold of you to assume I am, or have ever been, a child
#childwar
basicly i am not mastering either in literatur or language, I'm not poetry, journalist, writer etc. I'm just audience who write review for:
1.sharing my impression and thought related to good anime
2.spreading facts about good anime
Now, as for the way you rate your shows. Giving everything a 10/10 is, as I've said previously, like giving everything a 1/10. A 10/10 means that the show is perfect with no flaws what so ever. If everything is flawless, then whats the point of even rating shows? You still haven't pointed out any examples of my "inconsistent" rating by the way.
Also, how the fuck can you, with a straight face, give Tales of Zestiria a 10/10. It lacks EVERYTHING you mentioned is important in a show. Zero character development. Awful directing. Incoherent story structure. Awful. Awful. Awful.