About the Ghibli Filter Trend

Offline

Aug 2023

194

If only people cared this much about real problems

Apr 4, 9:24 AM

#23

LostSpectre

Offline

Jan 2013

6752

There's literally nothing wrong with an AI art filter, unless it's monetized.

If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that.

Apr 4, 1:52 PM

#24

zeayan

Offline

Aug 2024

3

only facts spoken 💯

Apr 4, 2:21 PM

#25

Offline

Jun 2022

56

Fishb0i said:
Words, words, words. I'm not necessarily pro-AI, but I'll support it for as long as it pisses off obnoxious Twitter users.

You sound insufferable yourself

Apr 4, 2:23 PM

#26

Offline

Jun 2022

56

Realicle said:
If only people cared this much about real problems

As if you care about those so-called “real problems” yourself, fellow MAL user.

Apr 4, 2:28 PM

#27

Fishb0i

Offline

Dec 2020

476

tabbycatcircus said:

Fishb0i said:
Words, words, words. I'm not necessarily pro-AI, but I'll support it for as long as it pisses off obnoxious Twitter users.

You sound insufferable yourself

That, I am. What of it?

Apr 4, 2:50 PM

#28

mnookmi

Offline

Apr 2022

1

Bolona07 said:
Normally I would complain about the effects of AI on the art and animation community but I think that this is one of the rare times that AI is actually relatively harmless, they aren’t replacing any artists, it’s as simple as seeing how the filter recreates your face in another artstyle. This is something that is only really possible with a filter.

it is also possible by commissioning real artists…?

Apr 5, 12:30 AM

#29

Offline

Dec 2017

17

mnookmi said:

Bolona07 said:
Normally I would complain about the effects of AI on the art and animation community but I think that this is one of the rare times that AI is actually relatively harmless, they aren’t replacing any artists, it’s as simple as seeing how the filter recreates your face in another artstyle. This is something that is only really possible with a filter.

it is also possible by commissioning real artists…?

And why the hell would I do that if I can do it for free in 15 seconds? Yall dont understand that we undergoing an industrial revolution just like people have before and jobs / occupations / hobbies will drastically change and get replaced. Thats the reality of things.

No one in their right mind would commision someone and pay them to plow their land if there is a machine that will do it faster and for cheaper than a person, even though that person wouldve done a neater and more sophisticated job.

Apr 5, 1:39 AM

#30

ZenLemonade

Offline

Dec 2022

88

LostSpectre said:
There's literally nothing wrong with an AI art filter, unless it's monetized.

yess i totally agree with that also
people should keep it to themselves

Apr 5, 3:21 AM

#31

Hurtingjuice991

Offline

Dec 2023

174

There are much worse problems in the real world

Apr 5, 6:24 AM

#32

Offline

Jun 2022

56

TkoPro said:

mnookmi said:

it is also possible by commissioning real artists…?

And why the hell would I do that if I can do it for free in 15 seconds? Yall dont understand that we undergoing an industrial revolution just like people have before and jobs / occupations / hobbies will drastically change and get replaced. Thats the reality of things.

No one in their right mind would commision someone and pay them to plow their land if there is a machine that will do it faster and for cheaper than a person, even though that person wouldve done a neater and more sophisticated job.

One more thing to rely on that’s bad for the environment and culture

Apr 5, 10:07 AM

#33

Offline

Dec 2017

17

tabbycatcircus said:

TkoPro said:

And why the hell would I do that if I can do it for free in 15 seconds? Yall dont understand that we undergoing an industrial revolution just like people have before and jobs / occupations / hobbies will drastically change and get replaced. Thats the reality of things.

No one in their right mind would commision someone and pay them to plow their land if there is a machine that will do it faster and for cheaper than a person, even though that person wouldve done a neater and more sophisticated job.

One more thing to rely on that’s bad for the environment and culture

Read up if you want to be actually informed about the things you say on the internet:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x

If youre too lazy to read then Ill summarize for you:

"Our findings reveal that Al systems emit between 130 and 1500 times less CO2e per page of text generated compared to human writers, while Al illustration systems emit between 310 and 2900 times less CO2e per image than their human counterparts."

So your argument is what exactly?

Apr 5, 10:25 AM

#34

Offline

Aug 2023

194

tabbycatcircus said:

Realicle said:
If only people cared this much about real problems

As if you care about those so-called “real problems” yourself, fellow MAL user.

Ahhh yes, keep projecting. Im not the one complaining about it on mal though, am i?

Apr 6, 9:31 PM

#35

sethiscoolanime

Offline

Dec 2024

4

I honestly would be livid if people were using ai versions of my art. It kinda is a slap in the face after creating beautiful films

Apr 7, 10:10 AM

#36

Johan23t

Offline

Aug 2024

82

I'm fine with AI as long as it doesn't affect anyone negativity. And the Ghibli trend doesn't hurt anyone besides the ChatGPT servers.

Apr 8, 4:19 PM

#37

VanillaSalt11037

Offline

May 2021

2

General word of advice to the anti-AI crowd/artists if you want people to side with your cause maybe don’t go around demonizing people for using a chatbot gpt filter on a picture of their dog/family. You end up looking like those vegans who want you to support their cause yet at the same time will call you a monster for wanting to eat a steak. This is why people have rapidly lost sympathy for you, the art communities online already had a bad reputation for being toxic but this AI fear mongering and demonizing of anyone who isn’t allergic to AI has slowly turned entire swathes of the internet against you. More and more I am seeing people dance on the graves of artists careers out of sheer spite and apathy. (oh and posting pictures of fanart and corn on X and Instagram doesn’t make you an artist on the same level as Miyazaki or Da Vinci so stop acting so pretentious whilst you are at it)

Apr 11, 7:25 AM

#38

Offline

Jun 2022

56

TkoPro said:

tabbycatcircus said:

One more thing to rely on that’s bad for the environment and culture

Read up if you want to be actually informed about the things you say on the internet:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x

If youre too lazy to read then Ill summarize for you:

"Our findings reveal that Al systems emit between 130 and 1500 times less CO2e per page of text generated compared to human writers, while Al illustration systems emit between 310 and 2900 times less CO2e per image than their human counterparts."

So your argument is what exactly?

First your shitty study includes human emissions generated from existing, which can always lessen if we stop using cars for example, and stopped eating factory farmed meat. Second this does not include AI’s need for clean water which is a precious resource. A laptop for drawings does not consume water and has a longer life. Moreover you don’t need to rely on yet more microchips with rare earth metals, because in order to access those giant servers you need a laptop anyway, and before you bring up the internet etc. if you use Ai art you’re using the internet too lmao.

Apr 11, 7:27 AM

#39

Offline

Jun 2022

56

VanillaSalt11037 said:
General word of advice to the anti-AI crowd/artists if you want people to side with your cause maybe don’t go around demonizing people for using a chatbot gpt filter on a picture of their dog/family. You end up looking like those vegans who want you to support their cause yet at the same time will call you a monster for wanting to eat a steak. This is why people have rapidly lost sympathy for you, the art communities online already had a bad reputation for being toxic but this AI fear mongering and demonizing of anyone who isn’t allergic to AI has slowly turned entire swathes of the internet against you. More and more I am seeing people dance on the graves of artists careers out of sheer spite and apathy. (oh and posting pictures of fanart and corn on X and Instagram doesn’t make you an artist on the same level as Miyazaki or Da Vinci so stop acting so pretentious whilst you are at it)

And yet shaming works. Now people are a little more conscious of their actions and their environmental impact. Bring back feeling remorse.

Apr 11, 7:27 AM

#40

Offline

Jun 2022

56

Realicle said:

tabbycatcircus said:

As if you care about those so-called “real problems” yourself, fellow MAL user.

Ahhh yes, keep projecting. Im not the one complaining about it on mal though, am i?

Baby’s first buzzword

Apr 11, 7:32 AM

#41

strikeee

Offline

Jan 2025

23

Bolona07 said:
Normally I would complain about the effects of AI on the art and animation community but I think that this is one of the rare times that AI is actually relatively harmless, they aren’t replacing any artists, it’s as simple as seeing how the filter recreates your face in another artstyle. This is something that is only really possible with a filter.

Shut up you faker.

Apr 11, 7:34 AM

#42

strikeee

Offline

Jan 2025

23

Fabio_Costa_ said:
get yourself a life brother, this is not a real problem.

get a job bro. quit hogging around being a sluggish american

strikeeeApr 11, 7:40 AM

Apr 13, 2:06 AM

#43

Offline

Dec 2017

17

tabbycatcircus said:

TkoPro said:

Read up if you want to be actually informed about the things you say on the internet:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x

If youre too lazy to read then Ill summarize for you:

"Our findings reveal that Al systems emit between 130 and 1500 times less CO2e per page of text generated compared to human writers, while Al illustration systems emit between 310 and 2900 times less CO2e per image than their human counterparts."

So your argument is what exactly?

First your shitty study includes human emissions generated from existing, which can always lessen if we stop using cars for example, and stopped eating factory farmed meat. Second this does not include AI’s need for clean water which is a precious resource. A laptop for drawings does not consume water and has a longer life. Moreover you don’t need to rely on yet more microchips with rare earth metals, because in order to access those giant servers you need a laptop anyway, and before you bring up the internet etc. if you use Ai art you’re using the internet too lmao.

Your solutions such as stop using cars and stop eating factory farmed meat are unrealistic and quite priviledged, probably coming from someone living in a first world country.

A laptop for drawing doesnt consume said materials but the user does, and thats what is important. You're imagining some type of utopia in which humans have very little co2 emissions which is impossible in our world. Get real and stop fantasizing about stupid shit no one is going to adapt to.

Also, dont call studies that are helping advance and understand technology and its impact "shitty" when youre a person writing on the internet with no real contribution to humanity.

Apr 13, 12:06 PM

#44

Offline

Aug 2023

194

@tabbycatcircus Baby’s first deflection. Dont block next time you wanna start something bit

Apr 20, 1:14 PM

#45

Offline

Jun 2022

56

Reply to Realicle

@tabbycatcircus Baby’s first deflection. Dont block next time you wanna start something bit

@Realicle no one blocked you lmao.

Apr 20, 1:18 PM

#46

Offline

Jun 2022

56

Reply to TkoPro

tabbycatcircus said:

TkoPro said:

Read up if you want to be actually informed about the things you say on the internet:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x

If youre too lazy to read then Ill summarize for you:

"Our findings reveal that Al systems emit between 130 and 1500 times less CO2e per page of text generated compared to human writers, while Al illustration systems emit between 310 and 2900 times less CO2e per image than their human counterparts."

So your argument is what exactly?

First your shitty study includes human emissions generated from existing, which can always lessen if we stop using cars for example, and stopped eating factory farmed meat. Second this does not include AI’s need for clean water which is a precious resource. A laptop for drawings does not consume water and has a longer life. Moreover you don’t need to rely on yet more microchips with rare earth metals, because in order to access those giant servers you need a laptop anyway, and before you bring up the internet etc. if you use Ai art you’re using the internet too lmao.

Your solutions such as stop using cars and stop eating factory farmed meat are unrealistic and quite priviledged, probably coming from someone living in a first world country.

A laptop for drawing doesnt consume said materials but the user does, and thats what is important. You're imagining some type of utopia in which humans have very little co2 emissions which is impossible in our world. Get real and stop fantasizing about stupid shit no one is going to adapt to.

Also, dont call studies that are helping advance and understand technology and its impact "shitty" when youre a person writing on the internet with no real contribution to humanity.

@TkoPro
"stop using cars" isn't a privileged take you obvious American, when public transportation is much more efficient and takes up less space and resources. But sure keep getting fooled by the automobile industry.
And most grains are used to feed shitty meat products instead of directly feeding people. Meat is not sustainable, you are privileged, you cannot fathom eating meat once a week.
"The user" is going to exist and consume materials anyway AI or not lmao, what is this argument
Also "contributions to humanity" is very nebulous. Can you say that destructive path we're on is a great contribution? Is anything like this worth it when it leads to more environmental sustainability? The best thing you can do is help your community and life a fulfilled life.

Apr 21, 4:44 AM

#47

Offline

Dec 2017

17

tabbycatcircus said:
@TkoPro
"stop using cars" isn't a privileged take you obvious American, when public transportation is much more efficient and takes up less space and resources. But sure keep getting fooled by the automobile industry.
And most grains are used to feed shitty meat products instead of directly feeding people. Meat is not sustainable, you are privileged, you cannot fathom eating meat once a week.
"The user" is going to exist and consume materials anyway AI or not lmao, what is this argument
Also "contributions to humanity" is very nebulous. Can you say that destructive path we're on is a great contribution? Is anything like this worth it when it leads to more environmental sustainability? The best thing you can do is help your community and life a fulfilled life.

It is a priviledged take, I live in a third world country in the Balkans btw, using public transport is a hell you probably can't even imagine. But keep on yapping about how it's "more sustainable" and "efficient" when you yourself probably don't use public transport daily to get to university (Which I do, and I wouldn't wich it upon anybody) or you live in a place which is not as densely populated. Either way your point is void and does not reflect reality in any way.

Also I don't remember mentioning the meat industry, which is something HUMANS consume, not AI super computers but pop off, the point still stands that AI does things faster, and more efficiently than humans. So why don't you start using AI to generate your images if you're so concerned about your CO2 footprint? By commissioning an artist you're actively supporting a person that might be eating meat or driving a car and destroying the environment in any other possible way, much more than an AI would.

Yes, AI advancements are very necessary and a quite natural progression on our road to becoming a type 1 civilization. I personally find it quite exciting to see where all of this will lead us, wether it is extinction or the ability to explore other planets, in the grand scheme of things it does not matter because none of the two of us arguing here on the internet will be here to witness either, we will infact be dead.

Apr 21, 8:16 AM

#48