SpamuraiSensei said: --ALEX-- said: So....all those times YouTube warned Alex Jones of his behavior....why would they even bother with that if this was politically motivated, why not shut him down immediately? Hell...might as well start purging YouTube of ALL Right Wing idiots if what you say is true! And yet, that has not occurred. I find it hilarious how Right-Wingers project like crazy....they happily call the left “victims” and triggered snowflakes, and yet.... Right-Wingers in real life: “YouTube, Facebook and Google are liberal, leftist, socialist, (insert buzzword) corporations and are literally trying to shut us down!!!” ^Literally triggered, playing the victims and believing they are being persecuted by the evil leftists. Seriously...if Right-Wingers think YouTube, Facebook, etc are all evil leftists, why are they still using these platforms? Go create your Right-Wing social media utopia! I’m sure “Free-Speech” will definitely be tolerated there! YouTube, Facebook, etc are all extremely popular with a gigantic user base. It's not as easy as "create your own right-wing media" platform. Besides, wasn't the left's thing all about freedom, anti-censorship and expression? What happened to the party? It's gone crazy and lost it's identity. alex isn't a leftist. |
 Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
Yomiyuki said: SpamuraiSensei said: YouTube, Facebook, etc are all extremely popular with a gigantic user base. It's not as easy as "create your own right-wing media" platform. Besides, wasn't the left's thing all about freedom, anti-censorship and expression? What happened to the party? It's gone crazy and lost it's identity. alex isn't a leftist. I know. Wasn't implying that he was. |
idk, pretty sure he's a baste bernie-bro moderate. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| smh this is authoritarian as fuck, this ban will target mostly whites who wanna perverse white cultures and heritage they literary banned the English flag for hate speech this is fucked. even thoughty2 a centrist thinks this is messed up link |
SpamuraiSensei said: Besides, wasn't the left's thing all about freedom, anti-censorship and expression? What happened to the party? It's gone crazy and lost it's identity. I mean right wingers claim to be that now, but they're honestly worse See: response to NFL Protests, "don't talk about your president that way", resurgence of violent video game argument, anytime flag burning is a thing, etc. In general, with such a massive political divide, you're bound to see people get upset with others. But I'd take what's going on in left wing parties over the alternative any day of the week |
Milennin said: Lol, 'hate speech'. I can't take that serious. So, whose precious feelings did he hurt with his videos? He said that the sandy hook shooting was a hoax and that the parents where crisis actors. |
d445 said: --ALEX-- said: #1 YouTube and Facebook is NOT the government and have nothing to do with allowing people “free speech”, if you violate their TOS, you are gone. the protection of the freedom of speech is the protection against discrimination. are you saying it's ok to discriminate people if no government is involved? think twice before writing a post. YouTube is not discriminating the rules are the rules. |
Nyu said: --ALEX-- said: Um...even if we grant that the Internet was built by The U.S....the U.S does NOT have any say on what happens on the internet as a whole. And seriously...THANK GOD they don’t! How dare Political Dissidents get Free Speech on Youtube, that would be so terrible. Alex Jones spreads lies that hurt people. It’s not about politics. |
eroyal said: SpamuraiSensei said: Besides, wasn't the left's thing all about freedom, anti-censorship and expression? What happened to the party? It's gone crazy and lost it's identity. I mean right wingers claim to be that now, but they're honestly worse See: response to NFL Protests, "don't talk about your president that way", resurgence of violent video game argument, anytime flag burning is a thing, etc. In general, with such a massive political divide, you're bound to see people get upset with others. But I'd take what's going on in left wing parties over the alternative any day of the week I'm not so sure about that. The far left has been pretty aggressive and violent lately with all of the #metoo movement, #blacklives matter, college campus protests and antifa riots. Either way, no sane people fall in line with either side. |
| Well, it's come out that the Apple head honcho and facebook's resident reptilian CEO personally seen to the Alex Jones ban on their respective platforms. lol The Alex Jones crowd is already anti-establishment and looney conspiracy theory stuff. This just cements his claims even further and makes him a bit of a martyr. |
| Oh no not the memes. This is why the government should seize all popular media outlets and prevent this type of fascism. |
 I can see you |
MasterGlyth said: Oh no not the memes. This is why the government should seize all popular media outlets and prevent this type of fascism. So you are promoting state sponsored , totalitarian/communist ideas Gotcha |
zzzeally said: MasterGlyth said: Oh no not the memes. This is why the government should seize all popular media outlets and prevent this type of fascism. So you are promoting state sponsored , totalitarian/communist ideas Gotcha Yea I've been exposed |
I can see you |
| How long is he banned? Did me make a backup of his list? Did he already try to contact an admin/mod on the IRC channel? |
| Good news, this is. |
Neane93 said: I guess Alex lost the Info Wars. Nah. I heard he was going to TYT (The Young Turks). |
 |
| Facebook and Youtube have taken government funds, and as such are not purely private organizations. They should be regulated as public spaces of the internet, and made to respect the 1st Amendment. I like how leftists suddenly become libertarians in cases like these though. Should Youtube be able to ban black users because they're black? If not, then don't pretend to believe that Youtube should be allowed to ban anyone it wants for any reason. Just say "Alex Jones made hate speech, so it's good that he was banned." That's an actual leftist argument. |
Polarc said: Facebook and Youtube have taken government funds, and as such are not purely private organizations. They should be regulated as public spaces of the internet, and made to respect the 1st Amendment. I like how leftists suddenly become libertarians in cases like these though. Should Youtube be able to ban black users because they're black? If not, then don't pretend to believe that Youtube should be allowed to ban anyone it wants for any reason. Just say "Alex Jones made hate speech, so it's good that he was banned." That's an actual leftist argument. He didn't actually make hate speech. He made hoaxes and conspiracies and harassed people or sumthin. Now if we can just get all the anti-vaxxers banned. https://www.popsci.com/measles-vaccination-rates-outbreak Motherfuckers got the small-pox son. Leper colonies when? |
|
Polarc said: Facebook and Youtube have taken government funds, and as such are not purely private organizations. They should be regulated as public spaces of the internet, and made to respect the 1st Amendment. I like how leftists suddenly become libertarians in cases like these though. Should Youtube be able to ban black users because they're black? If not, then don't pretend to believe that Youtube should be allowed to ban anyone it wants for any reason. Just say "Alex Jones made hate speech, so it's good that he was banned." That's an actual leftist argument. Discrimination based on race is against federal law. Nice false equivalency you have there. Harassing and making threats is not protect by federal law and He wasn't banned because he was white. He was banned for harassment and making threats against other people. |
| "among monsters and humans, there are only two types. Those who undergo suffering and spread it to others. And those who undergo suffering and avoid giving it to others." -Alice “Beauty is no quality in things themselves: It exists merely in the mind which contemplates them; and each mind perceives a different beauty.” David Hume “Evil is created when someone gives up on someone else. It appears when everyone gives up on someone as a lost cause and removes their path to salvation. Once they are cut off from everyone else, they become evil.” -Othinus  |
Polarc said: Facebook and Youtube have taken government funds, and as such are not purely private organizations. They should be regulated as public spaces of the internet, and made to respect the 1st Amendment. I like how leftists suddenly become libertarians in cases like these though. Should Youtube be able to ban black users because they're black? If not, then don't pretend to believe that Youtube should be allowed to ban anyone it wants for any reason. Just say "Alex Jones made hate speech, so it's good that he was banned." That's an actual leftist argument. Maybe you can make your own streaming service. You know, choice and demand. |
Bernrika said: Polarc said: Facebook and Youtube have taken government funds, and as such are not purely private organizations. They should be regulated as public spaces of the internet, and made to respect the 1st Amendment. I like how leftists suddenly become libertarians in cases like these though. Should Youtube be able to ban black users because they're black? If not, then don't pretend to believe that Youtube should be allowed to ban anyone it wants for any reason. Just say "Alex Jones made hate speech, so it's good that he was banned." That's an actual leftist argument. Maybe you can make your own streaming service. You know, choice and demand. I didn't know Anarcho-Capitalism was so popular these days. So you support the Electric company not selling Electric to people, you support shops not selling food to people, because it's their right to sell who they want to. |
DateYutaka said: the right and its dounble standses what baout chick fiilet and the gat wedding cake what do you mean... the chik fil a thing was ultimately irrelevant. as for the cake thing, that's not a right double standard. and the most recent one i remember was thrown out cause the gay couple in question was actively looking for a shop where they'd be rejected and find controversy in iirc. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| I really miss Alex Jones he entertained me and mad it so I was not stressed and suicidal anymore without him I would not of been able to leave this comment. |
 |
DateYutaka said: Yomiyuki said: what do you mean... the chik fil a thing was ultimately irrelevant. as for the cake thing, that's not a right double standard. and the most recent one i remember was thrown out cause the gay couple in question was actively looking for a shop where they'd be rejected and find controversy in iirc. nope its not irerent at there pelnty of strenming site that yo can post to my daliy mmotion account has oever 90 mlioon views over the coausr 1300 videos its the same as the both chic and the cake alex could have ogne ot daloiy motiion you lost me here. chik fil a had no bearing on anything outside of that year, i completely forgot about it til you brought it up now. what effects were there from that that are tangible now or how is it relevant to your point? are you saying the right ignored that? or what's your point? that the right ignored the chik fil a and cake thing? |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
DateYutaka said: Nyu said: I didn't know Anarcho-Capitalism was so popular these days. So you support the Electric company not selling Electric to people, you support shops not selling food to people, because it's their right to sell who they want to. cake shop gay cake simple chick filet the right were ok then what were the right doing during the chik fil a thing? |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
DateYutaka said: Yomiyuki said: what do you mean... the chik fil a thing was ultimately irrelevant. as for the cake thing, that's not a right double standard. and the most recent one i remember was thrown out cause the gay couple in question was actively looking for a shop where they'd be rejected and find controversy in iirc. nope its not irerent at there pelnty of strenming site that yo can post to my daliy mmotion account has oever 90 mlioon views over the coausr 1300 videos its the same as the both chic and the cake alex could have ogne ot daloiy motiion he could just self host on his own site I mean, if he can afford it when these lawsuits have bankrupted him  |
DateYutaka said: Yomiyuki said: you lost me here. chik fil a had no bearing on anything outside of that year, i completely forgot about it til you brought it up now. what effects were there from that that are tangible now or how is it relevant to your point? are you saying the right ignored that? or what's your point? that the right ignored the chik fil a and cake thing? nope they used the pvy company argument then as the faje left are noe yuki you know me of the pold old old style left inhate the new left as mch as i hate p[eople like sargin biut i would not cenor them there just stooges ofr the establishment ukip is not an anti-establishment party its full of mostly full hard right convsrtives [ not race based] its full of Thatcherites and there pro having a state religion there theocrats then sargon is hard right winger not a centrist i see, do you think the private company argument is rightfully being applied to alex? i haven't seen much of a theocrat side to ukip, tell me more? |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
DateYutaka said: i think that's a bit of a stretch, but i can see what you mean if you think it's a little hypocritical. the backed it wholesale cue the image of that image of the woman posing with two guns and bible saying ahe backed chick i think that the chik fil a thing wasn't really the same as here even if the arguments kind of are though. for chik fil a, if i'm remembering correctly, the main argument was that chik fil a didn't like gay people. i'll have to read up on it again, but i think the situations aren't the same. alex is being censored, wouldn't you agree? do you think that in itself is ok, or do you think there should be things put in place where that doesn't happen? |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
nicethings said: DateYutaka said: nope its not irerent at there pelnty of strenming site that yo can post to my daliy mmotion account has oever 90 mlioon views over the coausr 1300 videos its the same as the both chic and the cake alex could have ogne ot daloiy motiion he could just self host on his own site I mean, if he can afford it when these lawsuits have bankrupted him Centrists are against Free Speech these days, they support Corporate Censorship. |
DateYutaka said: Yomiyuki said: i think that's a bit of a stretch, but i can see what you mean if you think it's a little hypocritical. i think that the chik fil a thing wasn't really the same as here even if the arguments kind of are though. for chik fil a, if i'm remembering correctly, the main argument was that chik fil a didn't like gay people. i'll have to read up on it again, but i think the situations aren't the same. alex is being censored, wouldn't you agree? do you think that in itself is ok, or do you think there should be things put in place where that doesn't happen? say if i broke rules of say mal and got banned would i be beign censored has much as YT TOS are vaguge as all hell but rules are rules mal has shit rule-enforcing, but i get what you're trying to say. do you think if it's politically motivated that's a bad thing? |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
Nyu said: nicethings said: he could just self host on his own site I mean, if he can afford it when these lawsuits have bankrupted him Centrists are against Free Speech these days, they support Corporate Censorship. nyu nobody asked for ur input also stop capitalizing unnecessary words |
DateYutaka said: Yomiyuki said: i see, do you think the private company argument is rightfully being applied to alex? i haven't seen much of a theocrat side to ukip, tell me more? im anti corparist so taht argument has never held water with me its just an obsevation that once one sude were usins it now the other side and the centerisr are Ukip are diseastmiantrains ie there very pro Chruch alike aot of right winger parties are Unkip are not centerrisr they wil gut workers rights cuase thye are far right just as sargon is UK union laws are almost anti free assucaonal cuse of how restive they are i don't know enough about sargon, but i definitely don't think he's far right at all. i think ukip has done an ok job at not being overtly pro-theocracy. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| Who is Alexa Moans |
| "This little girl, who's not even half my size... taught me that tears can flow even from these silver eyes." - Teresa |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
272 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |