RioFS said:And you think Subaru's ENTIRE character can be described by saying that he's ...... immature? You actually think that does not expand upon his character when that's exactly what Re:Zero does?
He is a character more complex than simply "immature". The show potrays him as a human rather than an anime protagonist.
Eg., when Subaru is completely tired from overwork, and Emilia calls him to her room while he flirts with her. His flirtation at this point is actually kind of sad at this point, because of what he thought just before. "I need to make them laugh". That single phrase shows that a lot of his over-the-top behavior is just an act, attempting to make people like him. It already shows that he isn't acting that way simply because he is stupid or a simp. He is acting like that because it's the only way he knows how to interact with friends. Its expanded upon even more in S2E4.
Another is his shut-in aspect. Subaru treats the new world just like a RPG player treats a RPG world. He thinks he is the main character and everyone else is a bunch of NPCs. It shows that his mind mixes reality and fiction. He probably played so many games, and spent so much time in his room, he started feeling like the characters were more real than actual people out there. Therefore, treating real people like NPCs. Over the course of time, he gradually stops making game references over time, showing he's gained respect for this world and its people.
Subaru treats Emilia as the object of his desires and the show even acknowledges that. This flaw of his is solved by the end of S2. But the beginning of arc 1 gave him enough of a reason for Subaru to like her. He seems honestly amazed at how kind she is to everyone, even people who are stangers, even when helping someone puts her in problems. He could just walk way from her and find a new "waifu", but that made such an impression it wouldn't just go way. "Helping people, even on your own expense". That pretty much became a mantra for him.
Literally all you're listing is just the basic traits of the NEET-isekai-protag cliché. Refer to what I just told you about what's necessary for a character with actual depth and complexity.
Subaru has no defined objective, no consistent, reactive philosophy, and most importantly no thematic relation to any other character. That all you point to is weak, surface-level traits only further demonstrates this.
There's more but actually watch the show if you want to know it.
Fallacy. You insist there is more, but cannot present any.
"True criticism of concepts involves taking them to their logical extreme to allow them to demonstrate their own flaws." - Exactly what happens in the show. Its just that this criticism is shown and not directly told to us like we are a bunch of idiots who require spoon-feeding.
Baseless claim. What you listed above is in fact the exact opposite of this, so you've contradicted your own point.
"This is a common error made by people who fail to understand the nature of stories. The idea of things being either "plot-driven" or "character-driven" is untrue. Fiction is driven by everything, and everything drives it in turn. I mentioned this already earlier, every part of a work of fiction is created to impact and be informed by everything else in that same work. To say "well it's a character-driven story" is just a non-statement." - That's your own definition; I don't see why actual works have to follow your nonsense.
Where are you getting it being "my own definition" from? And even if it were, what would make it incorrect?
"What pulled the story to arc 3, did anything? Ask yourself that." - the beginning of the royal selection, Subaru's misadventure at the castle and the Witch Cult taking notice of the half-elf.
Ignoring my point. I'm asking if you can demonstrate that there's a defined theme supporting these events. As is clear, there is not.
"So you're concluding the theme of the work based solely on what you felt one fraction of the story focused on? That's incorrect." - Just ONE of its themes. Its main themes revolve around the Seven Deadly Sins and their respective virtues, basically human nature in short. Not all of the sins have been tackled tho, since the story is ongoing at the moment.
There being a group of characters named after the sins doesn't make them the theme. That's not how the term works, refer above to when I explained it to you.
"Again, shifting the burden of proof. You made the claim, you're to back it up, not some idiotic subreddit." - I am talking about the Re:Zero subreddit not the re:zero sucks subreddit, those two are vastly different. I am simply stating the location of the proof, which you apparently don't want to look for, implying you simply don't want to admit the fact that Re:Zero's good.
No. You are not pointing to anything, since you haven't highlighted what the proof is or what shows it is true. Are you implying every single member of the subreddit is an authority on what's good and what isn't? Are you merely hoping that someone with more sanity than you will come up and help you out? Both of these are fallacies. What is clear is that you're running from the debate because you cannot argue your point.
"You've not proved anything you've said, so your conclusion is false" - I already have in my previous post. You ignore it all, didn't ya? It's YOU who has failed to provide any actual proof
as to why Re:Zero is completely lacking in themes. I am not going to repeat myself.
A - I just demonstrated how what was in your previous post completely fails to refute anything I've said. Your still insisting your arguments work is an Ad Nauseum fallacy.
B - I already told you how theme works and how Re:Zero doesn't uphold this. You are ignoring this.
"Again, you're assuming your counterargument is without fault, when it of course is, so to run ahead and conclude my argument was incorrect is just deluded." - I have already backed up my
arguments with instances from the story unlike you, therefore it's you who is deluded.
Your arguments fail to refute my own, I already covered this.
"Assumption, prove it is my opinion." - Re:Zero has some truly amazing OSTs which suit events when they play, lending it the feel of an actual world rather than just another beautiful fantasy world. Disprove this.
Easy, define "amazing" and prove that it is.
"Prove both these statements." - You called Tappei a retard.
retard - delay or hold back in terms of progress or development.
Yeah, based on that definition, what you said is definitely a lie, on top of being an insult to another person. Its BOTH disrespectful and rude.
How is it a lie? And how is it rude? These are baseless statements.
Tappei's work is indicative of low mental and emotional maturity. As I already demonstrated multiple times, it's written without aim or direction, and without any visible thought put into it. This is, by all accounts, retarded, as an "artist."
"A fallacious conclusion. You're again assuming your earlier points were correct, making your point circular." - This coming from the same guy who said that Subaru is a shallow character? What a hypocrite.
How would it be hypocritical? He is shallow, I already explained to you why.
You're doing exactly the same thing again, where you jump ahead with what you believe to be true as refuting what I've said, only for me to show that your founding beliefs are false. Hence, your conclusion is untrue.
"I'm not even going to bother clicking that. If it is of note, you can repeat the information contained within." - I am not RickRolling you here; it simply an anime-only's perspective of Subaru, untouched by the LN.
And they're relevant how? Appeal to false authority.
"Your argument in this response has amounted to misunderstanding the nature of character and theme, calling on other fans of the show for help, and then just repeating that you think I'm wrong over and over without affirming that to be true. Pitiful."
- You have basically ignored all the arguments I have made and then go on to accuse me of calling upon help. Well, unless you actually acknowledge my arguments, I can't waste more of my time upon an elitist as pitiful as you. Have a good day.
That's a plain lie. I specifically responded to every single point you made. You cannot claim I have not acknowledged anything.
Additionally, prove I'm an elitist, and pitiful, these are again baseless statements.
----
What you've done here is simply double down on your already faulty, unjustified beliefs about the show. I advise you to actually read what I wrote about what defines character and theme before you next try to claim this piece of shit comes anywhere close. |