New
Nov 5, 2014 9:28 PM
#301
SakuWolf said: Now that I think about it when you put it that way, I do agree. Also lets not forget the part where Ciel is dressed up as a girl and that loon took him. I won't denied I was kind of creeped out. Yeah Im not going to denie its sexist. But it doesn't mean I hate it now. Ill still be a fangirl and love it. Apologies for truncating the post, I didn't want to make a quote tower. I just wanted to ditto the bolded part. My intention was, of course, not to attack anyone for liking Black Butler or some other anime of choice, just to clarify what was meant by the whole peadophilia thingie. I would expect that all of us have some guilty pleasures (though, do I hate that term so much) and that's perfectly fine. Also, even works that are far from being called guilty pleasures may have questionable elements in them, elements which we may be unlikely to notice the more we love said works. I am of the opinion it can actually be quite interesting to see/read differing views/criticism of the things we love. It really shouldn't diminish our love, but it may just make us more perceiving. Wait, what was I saying? I feel I am going off on a tangent, but yeah, I wanted to say in the most roundabout way possible that I actually agree with what you wrote. EDIT: On Wolf Girl and Black Prince...the moment I glanced the male MC description on Wiki, I knew this thing is something I should stay away lest it starts galling me after the first ep. Wiki said: He may look like a sweet person, but he is actually a sadist. Gradually he starts to care for her and becomes jealous whenever she gets close to other guys. He also develops a protective attitude towards Erika. He is actually more of tsundere hiding under the disguise of a sadist. No, fok you, anime. |
metamorphiusNov 5, 2014 9:53 PM
Nov 5, 2014 10:00 PM
#302
metamorphius said: SakuWolf said: Now that I think about it when you put it that way, I do agree. Also lets not forget the part where Ciel is dressed up as a girl and that loon took him. I won't denied I was kind of creeped out. Yeah Im not going to denie its sexist. But it doesn't mean I hate it now. Ill still be a fangirl and love it. Apologies for truncating the post, I didn't want to make a quote tower. I just wanted to ditto the bolded part. My intention was, of course, not to attack anyone for liking Black Butler or some other anime of choice, just to clarify what was meant by the whole peadophilia thingie. I would expect that all of us have some guilty pleasures (though, do I hate that term so much) and that's perfectly fine. Also, even works that are far from being called guilty pleasures may have questionable elements in them, elements which we may be unlikely to notice the more we love said works. I am of the opinion it can actually be quite interesting to see/read differing views/criticism of the things we love. It really shouldn't diminish our love, but it may just make us more perceiving. Wait, what was I saying? I feel I am going off on a tangent, but yeah, I wanted to say in the most roundabout way possible that I actually agree with what you wrote Thanks, Im glad you did. I never did find it healthy to hate a series if you find out a bad element or notice something. If you enjoyed it throughout that's what matters. Infact I enjoy a few sexiat anime like SAO (minus second half since the sexism was way more noticeable and painful) but I still sign it off as stupidity to the max. Im pretty sure alot of people in the club wont denied they like a sexist show or two. It does at least show we are willing to go out of standards but still have a worthy cause. |
EarwenNov 6, 2014 11:02 AM
Nov 5, 2014 10:28 PM
#303
| I agree. It's really interesting to read different perspectives on works we love, and of course, a lot of them will have problematic elements since the creators come from our society, but better to be aware. Also, I just watched the first three eps of Yona! Loving it so far! |
Nov 6, 2014 5:40 AM
#304
| Now if only someone explained it to the gaming community that saying something is problematic doesn't mean you shouldn't like it. |
Nov 6, 2014 12:05 PM
#305
Earwen said: Now if only someone explained it to the gaming community that saying something is problematic doesn't mean you shouldn't like it. Gamers, like the 'hardcore' gaming community, are a lost cause. Nothing can be explained to them. |
Nov 6, 2014 12:45 PM
#306
| It's not a matter of how much you like gaming. Just like the anime community there are the people who get somethings and other that don't. With the danger of comming close to the #notallgamers bullshit going on around i do feel that in this case I have to state the obvious. It's not a matter of hobby, being a bigot is a matter of personal responsibility. Also anime and manga always had sexist undertones, overtones w.e all the 90s low budget mass produced ovas are not exactly the pinacle of gender equality. |
Nov 6, 2014 12:54 PM
#307
Amberleh said: Earwen said: Now if only someone explained it to the gaming community that saying something is problematic doesn't mean you shouldn't like it. Gamers, like the 'hardcore' gaming community, are a lost cause. Nothing can be explained to them. That's a very broad generalization. And I wouldn't call anyone a lost cause. You have to remember that most (but not all) people who get angry at feminist critique are pretty young. Plenty of them grow out of their persecution complex. Lot's of examples of it in this thread. anyway I think we have a thread on gaming so this is kind of off topic. |
EarwenNov 6, 2014 1:18 PM
Nov 6, 2014 2:30 PM
#308
iristella said: Also anime and manga always had sexist undertones, overtones w.e all the 90s low budget mass produced ovas are not exactly the pinacle of gender equality. True. Yeah, I think it was just a selective memory. @Earwen: Yeah, it's amazing how people evolve. My own views have changed considerably over time. But as for gaming, at least we players can avoid jerks by finding better communities, but I feel bad for professionals or aspiring professionals in the industry. It is really discouraging knowing you might be in danger if you decide to go into a field that's supposed to be simply artistic, techy, and entertaining. |
Nov 6, 2014 4:43 PM
#309
new_user said: I agree. It's really interesting to read different perspectives on works we love, and of course, a lot of them will have problematic elements since the creators come from our society, but better to be aware. Also, I just watched the first three eps of Yona! Loving it so far! Agree, its always good being aware. But there is over cautious or over doing it so it good to have warning in the least. I do need to see Yona soon don't I? Earwen said: Now if only someone explained it to the gaming community that saying something is problematic doesn't mean you shouldn't like it. Im a gamer and never had any major problems with a game minus Kissed by the baddest bidder but that's a whole different rant for later. (Believe me out of the voltage inc game library I was offended by it and this is coming from the girl who loves My Forged Wedding) But I think gamers try to denied it at times or don't like games with problems. |
Nov 7, 2014 9:37 AM
#310
Earwen said: I have finished the VN some time ago and I wanted to talk about Steins Gate for a while now. [...] Just noticed this reply. I have some disagreements, so I'll respond more fully in a day or two once I've organized my thoughts on the issues - at this point it has been several months since I've seen it, and obviously I dislike it enough that I try not to think about it often. But for now I just wanted to thank you for putting the effort in - I've shown my post to others in a few different places since I posted it here and haven't gotten any real responses. So replies like that are really helpful in pushing and developing my thinking about issues like this. |
Nov 7, 2014 3:57 PM
#311
engalleons said: Earwen said: I have finished the VN some time ago and I wanted to talk about Steins Gate for a while now. [...] Just noticed this reply. I have some disagreements, so I'll respond more fully in a day or two once I've organized my thoughts on the issues - at this point it has been several months since I've seen it, and obviously I dislike it enough that I try not to think about it often. But for now I just wanted to thank you for putting the effort in - I've shown my post to others in a few different places since I posted it here and haven't gotten any real responses. So replies like that are really helpful in pushing and developing my thinking about issues like this. I'm looking forward to it then! |
Nov 7, 2014 5:41 PM
#312
| I have two more suggestions for the list and I do want thoughs Naruto- I have dropped the show because in my opinion its shit, but with the ordeal and controversy around Sakura at the I think it should be added after I have read the ending, yes may be strong physically but is still weak and in love with the douche who almost killed her! (Though I think the mangaka wanted it to fan fictiony) But I think it should be added. I don't think anyone knows this manga but Im dropping it, despite what my manga buddy says its highly sexist and just wrong. Its call Desire Climax, now I have reasons as to why Im suggesting it 1. Despite a strong protagonist in she is actually weak because she was taken by douche 500 and is forced into sexual acts and the amount of times she.stands up its ruined by the guys demand 2. The douche rapes her and she dosent tell anyone Now I had feels with Maid Sama but.instead of rape it was just her being a maid for a guy Im mixed on ( as much as I dislike the show(thought I need to rewatch to see why I did) at least in Maid Sama we understand why she was doing it and he didn't go too far (at least from what I remember) ,in this piece of shit while she and Misaka are in the same situation , it was rape and she just felt like she couldn't do anything) 3. They try the damn sympathy card, with the child hood thing 4. I skipped to the end and her house gets destroyed in the end because the douche who raped her was fed up and took it out on her again Now I love shoujo 90% of the time but this was something I am not going to let unnoticed any longer. |
Nov 7, 2014 6:23 PM
#313
| Anyone else actually read Naruto? I'm still catching up, for now I wouldn't put it on the list. I'll report back in a few months :P I don't know anything about the second anime/manga but it does sound bad. |
EarwenNov 7, 2014 6:30 PM
Nov 7, 2014 8:00 PM
#314
| tbh all those gender bender yuri anime are really sexist. but especially Kämpfer, it's an ecchi that highly sexualises women and homosexuality, and they have women fall for women just because of their bodies. though, in my opinion the fact that it's ecchi is just enough for it to be sexist. |
Nov 7, 2014 8:06 PM
#315
ryoudoru said: tbh all those gender bender yuri anime are really sexist. but especially Kämpfer, it's an ecchi that highly sexualises women and homosexuality, and they have women fall for women just because of their bodies. I agree. But I avoid those anime so I don't know specific examples of it. |
Nov 7, 2014 8:19 PM
#316
| Kampfer is crap par excellence. The stars had to align in a very specific ominous manner for it to be created. It being ecchi may be the least of its problems. |
Nov 8, 2014 1:12 AM
#317
| Wandering Son and Tokyo Godfathers are still the only anime I've seen that depict transgender people in a way that wasn't horribly fetishized. Or just handled stupidly (I read one chapter of Kashimashi and I was just like...yuck, the way this does EVERYTHING is wrong). I've heard that Simoun and Kuragehime are worth watching, but I've yet to get to them. |
Nov 8, 2014 3:21 AM
#318
| Yeah, I personally think Kuragehime is worth watching. It's pretty charming, though the ending is far from great, due to the manga still being published (I had to pick up the manga after watching the anime). However, the character I presume you're referring to isn't really transgender, but a cross-dresser (or maybe this counts, I am not really sure when it comes to transgender, so excuse me if I make a dumb comment). I liked the fact that his reasons for cross-dressing go deeper than your usual anime hijinks and excuses to include traps. |
metamorphiusNov 8, 2014 4:04 AM
Nov 8, 2014 4:37 PM
#320
| I’ve divided my response into three parts. Any of them can be read individually, if anyone’s interested in that, though even Part II and Part III may reference my earlier post at times. Of course, you’ll see the fullest picture of what I’m getting at if you read all three. Part I, which is by far the lengthiest, consists of direct responses to Earwen’s points. Part II is a discussion of the series from a different angle which argues similar points more broadly. Part III is about a comparison to the first Clannad season. As a result, it includes what may be considered spoilers from that series as well. Part I: Details with Earwen Substantial S;G spoilers below, including a minor VN reference that Earwen made. Earwen said: I have finished the VN some time ago and I wanted to talk about Steins Gate for a while now. Keep in mind I didn't watch the anime (but from what I know it's a pretty faithful adaption so it shouldn't make much of a difference). I haven’t read the VN, but based on what I’ve heard as well, you’re correct in stating that the anime is a pretty faithful adaptation. However, I don’t think that means that they can be treated as interchangeable when having a discussion like this. I say this because to my understanding, the VN is roughly 30 hours long, and the anime is about 12 hours long. Moreover, the format of a VN likely allows the creator to fit more content than he could into an anime of similar length. Between these two factors, I think it’s safe to say that the VN has substantially more content than the anime does. And since the plot of a faithful adaptation has to track the original’s pretty closely, most of the cuts in the adaptation process will come from things like characterization and the detail of character relationships. For example, you mention that Okabe mentioned sexual reassignment surgery to Ruka in the VN. I don’t remember that line in the anime, and it seems like something I would’ve remembered. My overall point here is that the anime may actually be substantially different from the VN in the ways that we discuss here, and so it’s useful to directly reference the anime when we’re discussing it. Luckily, the entire anime series appears to be on Youtube, so I’ve linked a few specific parts here. The anime is designed to stand alone, and my post was about the anime, so when we have disagreements, let’s try to focus on that. If you want to reference specific things that were revealed in the VN that contradict what I’ve laid out here, go ahead, and I’ll try to remember if those made it into the anime. Earwen said: From very early on in the series I simply could not shake this thought: “Wow, Okabe treats all of the women hanging around him like garbage, and they just sit there and take it.” Some examples: Ruka’s gender dysphoria is a big joke to Okabe (“But he’s a guy. But he’s a guy. But he’s a guy.”). Moeka’s shyness is a reason to continuously insult her. Kurisu is a constant target for perverted comments and other insults, and Okabe doesn’t even see fit to call her by her actual name. Several of the women are targets of Daru’s perverted comments, and it isn’t even passive: he explicitly encourages them to play into his perversions. In each case, Okabe and Daru are apparently trying to dehumanize and objectify the women. None of them, except Kurisu, seem to care at all, and even when she cares she just complains briefly before continuing on like nothing happened. They all just sort of got sucked into Okabe’s orbit and that was that. Okabe is basically insulting everyone all the time I don't know why you singled Moeka out. It's more like he gets frustrated because of her refusal to talk. And frankly I can't blame him on this. As for Kurisu's actual name Okabe doesn't call ANYONE by their actual name. He gives nicknames to everyone. That's his thing. I completely agree that the perverted comments were very problematic. The game relies heavily on otaku culture. It's where most of it's problems originate IMO :/ I actually didn’t single out Moeka here – for example, in the line below, I mentioned that he treated Kurisu similarly to Moeka. My whole point in this section is that Okabe did indeed constantly insult all of the women. I don’t recall him treating Daru similarly in the anime, and it’s impossible to document a negative, so if anyone else who’s watched the anime remembers differently, feel free to chime in. But if he didn’t insult Daru, then, as I said, he just constantly insults all of the women. As far as his treatment of Moeka specifically is concerned, we may have to agree to disagree – she’s clearly written as having significant communication issues, but I just don't think that justifies constantly insulting her. As far as Kurisu’s nickname is concerned, you are correct that he gives nicknames to everyone. The reason I brought her up specifically (and I wasn’t quite clear on this originally) is because she consistently tells Okabe to call her by her actual name and he ignores her, to the point where him calling her by her actual name (much later) is recognized as a significant event by both of them. A name is an important part of an identity, as I’m sure we can all appreciate, but Okabe just doesn’t care. Earwen said: The other side of this coin is that the women don’t really seem to have any goals separate from Okabe. Actually, you can go even further than this – only Suzuha and Moeka have even have goals involving Okabe, and those goals are actually just orders from superiors anyway. The rest of them don’t even have goals at all. Kurisu deserves a special mention here. She is one of the most celebrated time travel scientists out there, yet once she actually has access to time machines, she doesn’t actually want to do anything with them. She’s the most critical piece in the processes of figuring out how the phone microwave works and creating the time leap machine, which sounds nice, but she’s entirely content with letting Okabe control the use of them. Your second point baffles me. No one wants to do anything with the time machine. Okabe only uses it because he has to.They weren't even %100 it would work. Do you expect Kurisu to stop Okabe from saving Mayuri's life? What was Kurisu supposed to do with the time machine anyway? There was no use for the time machine until Mayuri died. And Kurisu definetly does have goals of her own, she is a scientist after all. They just don't tie in with the plot. As for the others.. The maid girl definitely does have goals, in the arternate time line she is very VERY passionate about a card game and her route revolves around that. And in the main timeline she created akihabara. Mayuri's goals are more ordinary, as in she wants to cosplay with her friends (she is working on the cosplay outfits during the story). Nothing extraordinary but it makes sense for her character. As for Luka, we really don't know much about them but I think complaining about that would be just nitpicking really.... As far as the time machines are concerned, let me be clear. When I used that term, I was referring to both the phone microwave and the time leap machine. My terminology may have been unclear, particularly with the similarity between “time machine” and “time leap machine”, but the phone microwave works much like a time machine does as far as having the ability to alter the past is concerned. Technically it involves movement among worldlines, but from the perspective of Okabe and those that he successfully convinces of the situation (most prominently Kurisu), it’s identical to altering the past. And Kurisu is a scientist, yes, and her research interest is time travel. This ties more directly into the plot than anything else in the entire anime. You’d imagine that once Kurisu has access to time machines, she’d want to use them carefully for research purposes. But as far as the phone microwave is concerned, Kurisu explicitly states that she has no interest in using it herself (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtSNzCEQplc#t=5m8s) . This approach is understandable, even in her situation, but even so, you’d think that, as a scientist, she’d attempt to exert very careful control over how the phone microwave is used in order to create the best experiments. But Okabe is always the one making the final call, and moreover, he soon becomes extremely careless with that final call, and so what he’s doing with it isn’t useful to Kurisu at all. As far as I can remember, this does not phase her. Then, when the time leap machine is finished (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9pgFoFO2kw#t=4m10s) , Kurisu carefully explains how it works, and then explains that a test subject will be needed. This indicates that she wants to test it. But then Okabe flatly states that they won’t perform an experiment, but will instead go public with it. Kurisu immediately relents, despite the fact that she realizes that her dad will then know that she created a time leap machine, and that this will cause problems for her (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9pgFoFO2kw#t=9m30s). Again: Kurisu was the most critical piece in building the time leap machine, but she feels no need to actually control how it is used, even though Okabe’s decision on that matter will cause her problems. I agree with you that after the death of Mayuri, her behavior would make sense. But this all happens before that. I’ll concede the point regarding Faris’s goals. As I said before, I’m basically more or less OK with how her parts shook out. If I recall correctly, she didn’t create Akihabara as much as she led to its creation by starting a maid café there, but that’s not any strike against her either. I’m not totally sure if I agree about the goals you lay out for Mayuri actually being goals, rather than … hobbies or something, but we seem to agree on the whole that the character has some pretty severe problems anyway, so I’ll just let it go. Earwen said: I haven’t mentioned Mayuri at all yet, and that’s because she’s the worst of them all. She cheerfully describes herself as Okabe’s hostage, which is disturbing enough on its own, and we later learn that Okabe is the one that instilled this identity in her, which is even worse. Moreover, the show consistently makes the point that she has absolutely no idea what is going on. So her most important role is … buying food for Okabe and Daru? And Okabe is often all too happy to turn that food into gel against her wishes. When all is said and done, she has a semblance of independent though twice in the series to my recollection: once when she’s the one to figure out that Daru is Suzuha’s father, and again when she slaps Okabe. Agreed here. Except the hostage thing didn't bother me. It was obviously just an in-joke between friends. I strongly disagree that this was an in-joke. The scene where the hostage bit is revealed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juaCIAi3SSs#t=4m38s) is presented extremely seriously. It involves the death of Mayuri’s grandmother, and the music, imagery, and overall tone makes the hostage bit come off as creepy, honestly. The death of a relative is hard, I know, particularly when you’re in grade school. But it was her grandmother, not her parents, and so as far as we know, her more basic family life was not imperiled. But Okabe essentially enables and even promotes her just … never growing up. Again, she is 16. I’ve seen some people elsewhere ask if she was supposed to be mentally disabled on some level, because her mental and emotional growth really is that stunted. Earwen said: So these are the basic characters we’re dealing with here. Then the plot gets rolling. I guess it’s kind of nice that Okabe lets the women send whatever D-mails they want to fulfill their dreams – but the big thing to keep in mind here for our purposes is that it is indeed Okabe that let them send the D-mails. Then he sends another one himself. Then Mayuri dies. I don't get your point? Who else is supposed to send them? I mean in the vn he is the POV character so it's obvious he would send them but even ignoring that I don't see the problem. This paragraph was here for a couple reasons: a) to provide a(n admittedly awkward) transition between discussing the characters and discussing the plot, and b) to emphasize that the entire reason that the situation got so out of hand was because Okabe let that happen. This is important to mention because as I said a bit after this: “Remember, it was Okabe’s fault in the first place that he let the phone microwave be used so loosely and that he ended up so deep in the Alpha worldlines. But this certainly doesn’t cause him to actually try to persuade Faris, Ruka, or Moeka to help him – instead, he just bluntly states what he wants, or worse, and waits for them to come around.” Since it’s Okabe’s fault, you’d expect him to try to explain the situation and beg them for help for a few reasons: a) The anime kind of plays fast and loose with this at times, but in general the women have no idea that other worldlines exist until weird memory echoes come back to them later, so Okabe should appear to be basically crazy, and b) If any of them decided not to help him, he’d have exactly no alternative, and c) You can make pretty convincing arguments that Faris, Ruka, and Moeka are all better off in the worldline he encounters them in than they were in the one he’s trying to get back to, even with Mayuri’s eventual death. Faris’s dad is alive where she was, but if she helps Okabe he will not be. Ruka’s female where she was, but if she helps Okabe she will not be. And Moeka was able to accomplish significant things on behalf of a “motherly” figure where she was, but if she helps Okabe, she’ll lose that identity. Despite these reasons, Okabe simply doesn’t feel the need to even ask them, let alone beg them, for help. Instead, he just tells them what to do, or worse, in Moeka’s case, and they do it. Earwen said: Then, Ruka. Rather than trying to actually persuade her to do what he wants, Okabe simply tells her that she’s really a guy, and that she needs to go back to being a guy for Mayuri’s sake. That’s all of the explanation that he gives, and it makes her cry. But she pretty quickly turns around, calls him back, and then is willing to give Okabe what he wants in exchange for … a date. So Ruka values a few hours with Okabe more than her biological gender. Ruka is obviously written by someone who has no idea how gender works. I still don't know what gender they are. Okabe calls Ruka a guy because for all he knows they are a guy. He is actually surprised to hear that they want to be a girl. He even asks if Ruka wants to get gender reassignment surgery (Ruka ignores it so I guess they don't?). And by the end of the VN Ruka is more confident and comfortable with their body. Still a lot of problematic stuff but I expected much worse when I read this. However the last line is plain wrong. Ruka didn't do it for a date. Ruka did it TO SAVE THE LIFE OF THEIR BEST FRIEND. It's the whole story I don't know how you can ignore this. I’m glad we agree that Ruka’s gender is treated problematically at best, but I strongly disagree with your assertion that Ruka was ultimately motivated by a desire to save Mayuri. Here’s the scene in question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6UWZcQBX-8 Let’s look at this dialogue carefully. Okabe: “Rukako. Stay calm and hear what I have to say. The truth is, you really used to be a guy.” Ruka: *tears wells up* “Again with that?” Okabe: “Wait! Don’t cry! Just stay calm and hear me out! This is all for Mayuri’s sake. I need you to go back to being a guy.” There’s no evidence so far that she believes him at all, clearly. Moreover, Okabe does not actually explain how Mayuri’s well-being is tied to Ruka’s gender at all. Then after the opening, the scene changes, to Okabe, Kurisu, and Mayuri, and both of the women are angry at Okabe for what he did. Immediately after, Okabe explains the situation to Kurisu. Then we get a flashback to the original conversation of Ruka saying: “You’re just playing around as usual, right? You’re just joking, right? That’s so mean! I can’t believe you’d say such things to me…!” This is an illuminating line because it helps illustrate that in the relationship between Okabe and Ruka, Okabe is not especially serious. He would joke about things like this, which further emphasizes the fact that Ruka does not believe him. Then while Okabe is still speaking with Kurisu, he gets a text from Ruka: “I have something important to discuss. Could you come to the shrine?” It’s interesting that she does this. Okabe went to explain the situation to Kurisu immediately after Kurisu learned of the original conversation, and then this text was sent. And it’s not as if Mayuri has any idea what’s going on. So Ruka hasn’t spoken to anyone about the matter since that original conversation. But she’s found a bargaining chip… Ruka: “Okabe.” Okabe: “Sorry about earlier.” Ruka: “No, I’m sorry for bursting into tears…” Okabe: “So, you had something important to discuss?” Ruka: “Yes, I have a favor to ask…” Okabe: “A favor?” Ruka: “I believe what you said. So, umm… In exchange for turning back into a boy…I-I ask that you be my boyfriend!” Okabe: “Boyfriend?! Wh-why me?!” Ruka: “Because I like you. Because I like you, Okabe! So tomorrow, just for one day…please be my boyfriend!” Okabe: “B-But, you’re a guy—Okay, I’ll do it! Just don’t cry! Very well, if it’s just for tomorrow, then I’ll be your boyfriend!” Then Ruka begins crying tears of happiness. So Ruka says “I believe what you said” – this is as close as she gets to acknowledging Mayuri’s role in this. But all Okabe said was “This is all for Mayuri’s sake”, without an explanation why. And Ruka thought he was joking. And Ruka hasn’t spoken to anyone about the matter since then. So why would Ruka actually believe him now? She doesn’t – she has no reason to do so. Here’s what actually happened: After the conversation with Okabe, Ruka realized that he was extremely desperate for her assistance for some reason or another. But since she also wants him to be her boyfriend, she figured that she could trade him being her boyfriend for a day (ie, a date) for turning into a male. It actually gets worse. Even with this exceptionally easy route to get what he wants, Okabe’s last line there shows that he thinks that he’s the one that’s suffering here. But he’s getting exactly what he wants, and in exchange Ruka is losing her gender identity. It’s clear that Ruka has not yet “found” any of her memories from other worldlines when this happens, and so that’s not the reason that she says that she believes Okabe. We know this because when she does find a memory later on in the episode, she’s confused about the fact that she had that memory (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6UWZcQBX-8#t=16m25s). At the end of the date (same clip as before, about 15 seconds later), Ruka tears up again while discussing how Okabe being her boyfriend for the day made her so happy, then runs away while tearing up further. Finally, after both dates, Ruka does ask Okabe to help Mayuri at about the 19 minute mark. This is the only direct reference to Mayuri since Okabe mentioned “Mayuri’s sake” in the first minute of the episode, and the last even arguably indirect reference was Ruka saying ‘I believe what you said.” Mayuri was never mentioned in any form or fashion during the preparation for the dates or during the dates. Also, it's important to note that this mention of Mayuri happened only after Ruka "found" her memories of being male, and thus realized that Okabe was right. So with all of this, I’m not sure how you can argue that Ruka was doing it for Mayuri’s sake, since she was never told what her gender had to do with Mayuri’s sake at all and since she didn't realize that Okabe was correct until long after she agreed to the date. As a side note, it’s interesting to look at the point that Okabe realizes that the date wasn’t a “real date” since it wasn’t “really him”, so he goes back to Ruka to have that “real date” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6UWZcQBX-8#t=18m20s). This real date involves Okabe explicitly rejecting the boyfriend-girlfriend relationship that Ruka had asked for and replacing it with a teacher-pupil relationship. So even here, the successful ending of this worldline involves Okabe exerting a certain amount of control over Ruka. It’s also interesting to note that even after the date Ruka mentions that she doesn’t actually want to turn into a male and how she realizes that she’ll forget about the dates and interaction that happened here when she does (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6UWZcQBX-8#t=20m15s). Then Ruka says “It’s like you said, whether I’m a boy or a girl…none of that matters! Still all I ask…is that you remember me when I used to be a girl…!” So in other words, Ruka cares more about Okabe’s memories of her gender identity than her own actual gender identity. Another particularly choice phrase here is “As a boy, I won’t be allowed to like you…!” which is just flat-out homophobic. Part II: On the Relationship between Gender and Plot Substantial S;G spoilers below. So Part I digs into details pretty heavily, which may turn some of you off. So let’s take a different approach. First, look at the cast of major characters. There’s Okabe, Daru, Kurisu, Mayuri, Suzuha, Faris, Moeka, and Ruka. These are the eight characters that the series revolves around at some level. Six of the eight, a substantial majority, are women. (I’m calling Ruka a woman here because in worldlines that she’s biologically male, she wants to be female, and in worldlines that she’s biologically female, she wants to be more feminine.) But there are ultimately three major events in the series: a) The death of Kurisu b) The death of Mayuri c) The prevention of the deaths of Mayuri and Kurisu And there’s a couple important things to note about these events: a) All of these events are ultimately set in motion by men. Kurisu is killed by her father. Mayuri’s death is ordered by Mr. Braun, as far as we’re able to see in the show, anyway, though it teases at more. Mayuri’s and Kurisu’s deaths are prevented by Okabe. b) The events all involve the deaths of women. This is particularly interesting because you can’t necessarily argue that the deaths were driven by some incredible passion against the women. Kurisu’s father was jealous of her, sure, but he didn’t kill her just for that reason. She wrote the paper by herself and offered to share credit with him, since he inspired her (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiV0rkhjzM4#t=9m55s). But he wanted the credit all for himself, so he took the paper and prepared to leave. It was only after she objected, which indicated that she’d do what she could to prevent his plan, that he assaulted her and eventually killed her. That means that his murder of her was driven more by his need for recognition than his hatred of her. Mr. Braun and SERN in general had zero feelings toward Mayuri specifically. As Moeka says before killing Mayuri on orders of SERN, “Shiina Mayuri…is unnecessary.” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9pgFoFO2kw#t=21m14s). Taking all of this together, then, you can see that despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of significant characters are female, the entire plot is driven by the actions of men. Moreover, those men are getting what they want by manipulating and harming women. Kurisu’s father kills Kurisu, SERN, led by Mr. Braun, kills Mayuri, and Okabe serially manipulates other women to prevent those deaths. As Amberleh mentioned earlier, when arguing why Code Geass was sexist, “Code Geass used women as tools.” Steins;Gate similarly uses women as tools. To make matters even worse, one of the women does actually set out to affect the course of the action and proceeds to fail miserably. Suzuha uses the large time machine in an attempt to alter the past, but she fails (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch4lu5IdJ2g#t=14m38s). The series really, really wants to drive home the fact that she failed – take a look at the clip to see what I mean. So we have three men who achieved what they set out to do, one woman who failed to do so, and a bunch of other women who… aren’t really involved in driving the plot at all. But why are the men in S;G men? Why are the women in S;G women? As others have mentioned, most of the women in the anime do not even have a romantic interest in Okabe. But are we supposed to believe that it’s just a coincidence that they’re all women, and that the men are all men? If Kurisu’s jealous parent was her mother instead, or if Mr. Braun was a middle aged woman instead, or if any of the women besides Kurisu were men instead, the plot would be able to develop in exactly the same way that it does without the very sharp plot/gender issues mentioned above. But instead, there’s a very clear division between men’s relationship to the plot and women’s relationship to the plot. Part III: On “The Line for the List” Substantial S;G and Clannad (season 1) spoilers below. Please do not reply with any After Story spoilers that are not separately marked. Hopefully, at the very least, we can agree that Steins;Gate has significant issues with sexism. Given that, then, is it sexist enough to be on the list? Believe me, I’m really not that hung up whether something makes it to the list or not. I'm mostly coming at it from this angle because Earwen very flatly stated that it’s not list material. But I want to bring up a comparison that I mentioned earlier to another show on the list, Clannad (season 1). Most of us seem to agree that Clannad belongs on the list, largely due to Nagisa. Let me start by reproducing my original comparison to Clannad here: “I think it’s worth comparing the goals or lack thereof of the women and the overall nature of Mayuri to similar aspects of Clannad (the first season). From a feminist perspective, Clannad has pretty severe problems, and they’ve been discussed in this thread. In my opinion, Clannad definitely deserves to be in the OP. But even Clannad manages to have multiple women working towards significant goals that don’t revolve around men. Fuko wants the students at the high school to attend her sister’s wedding, and Tomoyo wants to become president of the student council so that she can save the cherry blossom trees. Tomoya does what he can to help Fuko and Tomoyo reach their goals, but they are the ones putting in the real work to make them happen. Even the (fairly) maligned Nagisa wants to join the Drama Club and put on a play. And that brings me to the second comparison to Clannad - Mayuri strongly reminded me of Nagisa. Both of them are overly sweet, overly innocent girls that are protected by the show’s lead. It’s true that Nagisa cannot do anything by herself, and this helps make her anti-feminist. But at least she’s trying to do something. It’s true that Tomoya constantly has to push Nagisa to get her to do things, and this again helps make her anti-feminist. But at least he is doing what he can to help her grow as a person. Okabe would rather infantilize Mayuri indefinitely. Mayuri is 16 years old – not much younger than Nagisa’s what, 18? That kind of age gap shouldn’t excuse Mayuri from being criticized for the negative traits that she shares with Nagisa, particularly when she’s even worse in some ways. So if Nagisa is a soulless waifu, doesn't that make Mayuri a soulless “imouto”?” Let’s set aside the focus on goals I mentioned here – I conceded certain goals that the women in Steins;Gate had earlier in Part I. I included that portion here, though, to emphasize that Clannad also includes such goals (and much more prominently, at that). But I think the Mayuri/Nagisa comparison stands pretty well, as of now. So we have that. But then Steins;Gate includes a variety of perverted comments, and everyone so far has agreed that these are problematic. Clannad doesn’t have these comments. Moreover, Steins;Gate includes Okabe assaulting and then sexual assaulting Moeka in an attempt to get what he wants from her, and she eventually agrees to help him (albeit in a less significant way than he wanted originally). As far as I can tell, Okabe is never really presented as the “bad guy” here for doing what he did – he gets a bit of help, then the show moves on. He never has any sort of mental agony or self-doubt about what he did, and Moeka doesn’t particularly seem to care either. Clannad doesn’t have assault or sexual assault. Steins;Gate has a problematic approach to gender at best, given Ruka. Clannad doesn’t have this problem. So after all this, what positive aspects does Steins;Gate have that Clannad lacks, or what negative aspects does Clannad have that Steins;Gate lacks, that are significant enough that Clannad belongs on the list but Steins;Gate does not? PaladinAlchemist mentions the women in Steins;Gate having jobs and the men not having jobs, which is an interesting thought. I’m not convinced about its significance, though, given that Okabe and Daru are (graduate?) students, not NEETs. Then Mr. Braun of course has his own shop. I’ll grant Kurisu being a scientist, as many problems as I have with that, as I laid out in Part I, but the other women simply have part-time jobs, not career work, so I’m not sure that they’re presented as any better off in that way than Okabe and Daru are. She also mentions their variety of personalities that often don’t fit exactly into stereotypes. I’m not well versed enough in the stereotypes yet to argue this point too well, but for now I feel like that’s more a general good-writing point in S;G’s favor than it is an anti-sexist point. Finally, she mentions the overall lack of romantic interest in Okabe. It’s been a while since I’ve seen Clannad, but I don’t remember the characters beyond Nagisa and Ryou having much romantic interest in Tomoya either. So I think in this way I believe that they’re both “harems that pretend to not be harems,” and when taken into consideration with everything else above, I feel that both ultimately belong on the list. |
engalleonsNov 9, 2014 6:35 AM
Nov 9, 2014 7:39 AM
#322
| Yeah that's fine. There's a lot to go through. |
Nov 9, 2014 9:43 AM
#323
| Does anyone mind if I add Blue Submarine No. 6 to the list? Has very rapey scenes for no reason except "fanservice" I guess. Like ew. NSFW-ish:http://i.imgur.com/P8gUtds.png http://i.imgur.com/Duwtquk.png |
Nov 9, 2014 11:19 AM
#324
| Go for it. That's a bummer though, I remember it airing on AS and always meant to watch it but never got around to it. |
Nov 9, 2014 11:40 AM
#325
| Added. If it makes you feel better it wasn't all that interesting anyway. |
Nov 9, 2014 11:41 AM
#326
Earwen said: Does anyone mind if I add Blue Submarine No. 6 to the list? Has very rapey scenes for no reason except "fanservice" I guess. Like ew. NSFW-ish:http://i.imgur.com/P8gUtds.png http://i.imgur.com/Duwtquk.png Go ahead, Earwen. You'll be saving people from a lousy anime to boot. ETA: Saku is right. I think I will add Desire Climax, if no one has objections. |
new_userNov 9, 2014 1:48 PM
Nov 9, 2014 2:58 PM
#327
| Gantz any work by Jiro Matsumoto |
Nov 9, 2014 5:54 PM
#328
| Agreed with Gantz. I don't know the other guy though. Anyone? |
Nov 9, 2014 8:33 PM
#329
| Sexism aside, I didn't care much for Blue Submarine. The badly-aged CGI is the least of its problems, I think. Based off a manga written in the 60s, the degree to which it bungles the understanding of the Earth's magnetic field is laughable. Indeed, if only our resident evil "genius" knew that stripping it off would also cause the oceans to be stripped off, which is basically what happened to Mars. Unfortunately, far too much of the drama is rooted in this sort of pseudoscience. I liked the main character fine, while realizing he's another iteration of the "grim, misunderstood warrior" trope, but the main female character, Kino, just comes across as a nasty, short-sighted whiner, and basically everybody else gets too little screentime to make an impact. It was an ambitious series, I recognize, but I thought it was a mess. I don't think you're missing anything by skipping on it. And yeah, I can't believe somebody didn't think of Gantz earlier. Definitely in favor of that POS landing on the list. |
Nov 10, 2014 9:49 AM
#330
Earwen said: He's basically rape and violence. A very good writer and artist too, but he doesn't portray women in a very good light, he doesn't portray anyone in a good light for that matter.Agreed with Gantz. I don't know the other guy though. Anyone? If you want to see what I'm talking about read the first chap of Freesia |
Nov 10, 2014 11:49 AM
#331
| Since somebody mentioned Naruto, I'll rant about the ending. Warning spoilers for the ending, also I'm very anti-sasusaku. Ughhhhhhhhh okay I would have been all right with Sakura ending up with LITERALLY anybody else than Sasuke. Sakura has tried to kill Sasuke. Sasuke has tried to kill Sakura on multiple occasions. There is not a single occasion before the ending I remember where Sasuke ever showed the tiniest interest in Sakura. Or even talked kindly too her. He has insulted her and ignored her his whole life. I honestly have no idea what she sees in him. I can not possibly be his personality, so it has to either be: he's really hot, or, she's in love because they're 'soulmates' or some bullshit. But it's okay to teach girls that if you are hopelessly in love with a dude who hates your guts and you've tried to kill each other that everything will magically be okay. Your male friend will definitely save him from the dark side for you, so you don't have to do anything and you will become happily married to him. ALSO they just show Sakura as a housewife at the ending. Naruto is a hokage, Sasuke is travelling I think, and what is Sakura doing?? Of course cleaning her home. She never really got any big moment in the manga, and definitely not if compared to Sasuke and Naruto. And what do Sakura and Sasuke do??? Have a kid together and fucking name it SALAD. SALAD. THEY NAMED THEIR KID SALAD. I'm so done. Also, I admit that since chapter 700 takes place 10 years later, it IS possible that they have changed a lot, and forgive each other their mistakes and whatnot, but this is such bullshit because we don't get to see that character growth between them. It's just lousy writing. It's like if the Harry Potter ending would just randomly be '10 years later, Hermione and Bellatrix were happily married with kids.' NO. As you can probably tell if you read the spoilers, I think it's pretty anti-feminist. Okay, these are a fraction of my thoughts, if somebody badly wants to rant about me with Naruto, we should make a separate thread, because let's face this, we could rant about it for years. Or just private message me. |
Nov 11, 2014 10:04 AM
#332
| Hello, everyone :) I'd add Bakuman and Katekyo Hitman Reborn to the list. Sexism in Bakuman was very blatant and aggressive even. I somehow made it through the show, but at the cost of getting perpetually angry every episode. The girls in this show were treated so horribly I could barely believe the good rating it has. In KHR, the only one of Tsuna's guardians, who was unable to do anything on her own, was of course the only girl among them, Chrome. Tsuna's female classmates didn't serve any other purpose than being boys' love interest or them having main protagonists as their interest, not to mention they spent every other episode cooking for the boys. There were few strong-ish females (such as Lal Milch) but it certainly didn't outweigh the rest. |
daarkraiNov 11, 2014 10:11 AM
Nov 12, 2014 10:07 AM
#333
| hi people can i add Shigurui, i haven't seen it but just reading the bibliography explains it and also my friend said its very sexist towards women |
Nov 12, 2014 11:37 AM
#334
Unthinkable92 said: hi people can i add Shigurui, i haven't seen it but just reading the bibliography explains it and also my friend said its very sexist towards women That one was mentioned back on Page 2... it wasn't added then not because it isn't sexist, but more because it was tagged seinen, most of those are sexist anyway, and the general audience for this club wouldn't want to watch them anyway. The focus of the list is more on super popular stuff and/or things that would be specifically recommended to women that really shouldn't be. |
Nov 12, 2014 12:15 PM
#335
| What? Why? I watch more seinen than shoujo or josei. I don't think we should exclude anime from the list just because "women are unlikely to watch it". That said I'm not adding Shigurui until someone who actually watched the show says something about it. |
Nov 12, 2014 12:33 PM
#336
Earwen said: What? Why? I watch more seinen than shoujo or josei. I don't think we should exclude anime from the list just because "women are unlikely to watch it". That said I'm not adding Shigurui until someone who actually watched the show says something about it. That was all Amberleh said at the time. I was just relaying that - if I implied agreement, I didn't mean to. Even at the time she said she had no problem with adding it, so might as well add it, sure. Here was the original post about it: Quixotes_Solace said: I am quite surprised that "Shigurui: Death Frenzy" is not on that list. Though the sexism in it is only justified in a historically accurate context, it still stands as almost pure exploitation of female characters no matter how you look at it. Just putting it out there. That nipple ripping scene makes me shiver every time I think about it *shivers* |
Nov 12, 2014 1:50 PM
#337
| Oh yeah you can add it. My opinions on most everything have changed since I first started this club, ahaha. |
Nov 12, 2014 1:51 PM
#338
| I agree about Bakuman being sexist. Here are some articles I found: http://www.mangatherapy.com/post/1543578362/sexism-in-japan-bakuman https://watashiwabucho.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/why-i-wont-be-watching-the-third-series-of-bakuman/#more-101 http://www.hoodedutilitarian.com/2012/09/i-hate-you-because-i-love-you-shonen-jump-boys-club-edition/ http://scans-daily.dreamwidth.org/1893973.html ---- I'd also like to suggest the manga: Please Save My Earth because the girl is in love with her rapist. There's also implied pedophilia between a young elementary boy and a teenage girl (I think an 8 yr age difference or something) |
Nov 12, 2014 7:38 PM
#339
| Found the name of a manga for the Corpse Party spin off that should be added. Its called Corpse Party Musume. It's shit, and sexist. Let me list it all out. 1. Pedophilia Sackico aka the scariest yet intersting girl ever was portrayed awfully. Ill break this done with her in the game and this shit. Sackico was a young girl who felt anger but wanted it to stop. Even though I was creeped out by.her, I had sympathy for her. She felt.sorry for the things she done but still wanted vengeance and no way to cope it. This makes understanding and a great character. In this piece of shit however she is portrayed as confused (before she died) Here's the pedophile shit. This teacher tried to date her. He does kiss her and she pushes him away and threatened to jump off the railing. Though I heard she forgives him. I don't know if its true but.that pisses me off. 2.The fanservice It should be noted I don't have a problem against fanservice or manserivce unless alot or too much loli or shota . This uses too much. Fuck it makes HighSchool.of the Dead and the first volume of Soul Eater look like Baka and Test fanservice (aka little to none most of time) Almost every time a skirt flips or boob pops out more then HSOD in more unrealistic ways. And the way they did it on Yuka was disgusting. 3. How they were portrayed In the game almost all the characters affect something in one way or another and while they can't fight they still managed to have strong characters we can relate to despite the situation. In hear the guys are jerks. Mainly Yoshiki and that pissed me off. I love his character for being kind to Ayumi even if she loves some one else and has anxiety and fear , he helps her and even sacrifices for her despite the fact she accidentally caused.the situation. That's what made him great, he wants to support her and love her even from a distance. Hear he yells at her and tells her she's stupid multiple times and she accepts it. What really made me tick was how they portray Yuka. Yuka was cheerful and bright but stands up for herself. Ill admit she did almost die twice but she wants to prove she is a grown and mature. That made me like her. Hear she's a bitch who wants her brother all the time. Normally I won't bitch about a character like that especially if they cling onto there siblings for a long time. But she puts herself in danger multiple times and still never felt sympathy for it. Normal people feel sympathy but she feels.in some ways Yuki from Vampire Knight. Never feeling sympathy that she puts herself in danger without sense, just wanting one person ,not mature. It's just an insult to fans and feminist alike. |
Nov 12, 2014 9:27 PM
#340
| I added Bakuman (because I couldn't not, after seeing that panel, Daisy) and Shigurui (because yeah, the women are mostly victims or damsels). I think Amberleh had the right idea though. We probably should limit the list in some way... Stick to popular titles? |
Nov 12, 2014 9:40 PM
#341
| Since Bakuman was already added, this comment is superfluous, but I just wanted to say I agree. I watched the anime in its entirety and sexism, among many other things, always bugged me. The "men have dreams that a woman wouldn't understand" thing appeared very early in the anime and not just on a single occasion, but I brushed it off and decided to continue it. That was an exceptionally stupid idea on my end as I ended up wasting time on 75 (in letters: seventy fucking five) episodes of said anime. I don't know what compulsion made me do it, but I guess I can try to pretend it was worth it because of the manga industry aspect and stuff I learnt about it. Yeah, that should work. P.S. Poor Iwase, Bakuman never let her off the hook. |
metamorphiusNov 12, 2014 9:44 PM
Nov 12, 2014 10:43 PM
#342
| I think that Shigurui is a well-done series. I remembered thinking that the direction of the fight scenes was excellent, which, given that the adaptation was directed by the same man who made Texhnolze, does not surprise me; the tension is palpable and the camera angles do a great job of highlighting that. I remember thinking that it was an interesting take on samurai politics also, and one of the few samurai dramas I've seen that didn't romanticize the subject at all. It's also full of sexual abuse, and the women aren't much more than objects to be thrown around by the male characters. I'm not sure in what part it's due to the habitual abuse of women in the body of seinen manga, and in what part it's a reflection of the history, but neither of those justifies the sexism nor means that it isn't worth a warning. That show, Berserk, and Code Geass are probably the only shows on this list that I will admit to liking, to be honest (though there are plenty I haven't seen). I will chime in my two cents about what we should and shouldn't include. I don't think it's fair to not include titles that aren't at all targeted at women, since I think the gender divide between readership/viewership isn't especially great these days (a simplification, but I think it works). It's more true in Japan now, and it's especially true in the US. As for obscurity, I know that I often stumble upon lesser-known titles and watch them out of curiosity. I'm certain that there are other people who do that, also, and on the off chance one of us has seen something obscure that's also sexist, I imagine that those people, if they're worried about that, would appreciate our warning. Sometimes, one thing that frustrates me is a lack of dialogue about a given show; when I write reviews for obscure anime, one of my motivations is to put SOMETHING out there about them on the internet (that people can read and agree with, disagree with, respond to, etc). That sounds horribly pretentious.... |
Nov 12, 2014 10:51 PM
#343
new_user said: I added Bakuman (because I couldn't not, after seeing that panel, Daisy) and Shigurui (because yeah, the women are mostly victims or damsels). I think Amberleh had the right idea though. We probably should limit the list in some way... Stick to popular titles? I agree, I also think the list should have a list of things that are sexist in the anime /manga on the list ,so if people are trying to stay away from a certain subject they will know because I will admit some of these titles on the list are good and I still believe in promoting good anime despite it being sexist. Though if it's too much work I do understand but its a though. Metamorphosis- yeah I don't have plans to see Bakuman because of how shitty some describe it. Though lets not forget it is from the creator of Death Note and the creator has been sexist to begin with. even though it did have potential to be masterpiece material. |
Nov 12, 2014 10:58 PM
#344
| So bakuman, aside from being boring as shit is sexist? |
Nov 13, 2014 5:21 AM
#345
| If we are going to limit the list I suggest we don't include pure fanservice/harem shows unless they are rated highly. Say, in the top 1000. |
Nov 13, 2014 12:26 PM
#346
Earwen said: If we are going to limit the list I suggest we don't include pure fanservice/harem shows unless they are rated highly. Say, in the top 1000. then To Love Ru Darkness must count Anime Score: 7.99 (scored by 33312 users) Ranked: #504 Popularity: #461 Members: 60,594 Favorites: 745 Manga Score: 8.19 (scored by 7722 users) Ranked: #547 Popularity: #159 Members: 15,894 Favorites: 1,225 btw: i rated it 10/10 |
Nov 13, 2014 1:11 PM
#347
| Welp. Not sure what to do with that one. I mean I'm pretty sure most everyone knows what they're getting into when watching To Love Ru Darkness. Unless it's sexists beyond just fanservice/ecchi , I think we can leave it off the list. |
Nov 13, 2014 3:48 PM
#348
SarcotarascusN said: I think that Shigurui is a well-done series. I remembered thinking that the direction of the fight scenes was excellent, which, given that the adaptation was directed by the same man who made Texhnolze, does not surprise me; the tension is palpable and the camera angles do a great job of highlighting that. I remember thinking that it was an interesting take on samurai politics also, and one of the few samurai dramas I've seen that didn't romanticize the subject at all. It's also full of sexual abuse, and the women aren't much more than objects to be thrown around by the male characters. I'm not sure in what part it's due to the habitual abuse of women in the body of seinen manga, and in what part it's a reflection of the history, but neither of those justifies the sexism nor means that it isn't worth a warning. I liked Shigurui too. It seems gratuitous rather than historically accurate when the violence is sexual, unusual, and inflicted on multiple characters in the same show. (NSFW: I really doubt women were tied up in this way. It suggests fetish.) Although I agree a lot of the dynamics are true to life, e.g. the samurai overlooking the leader's mistreatment of his daughter. You raise a good point about the list. Maybe we can still discuss the obscure stuff but limit the list itself so it doesn't get unwieldy. Then again, there's always Ctrl+F, lol. What do you think, Amberleh? I was also thinking that we could have a legend and some symbols indicating what it is about each show/manga that's objectionable. |
Nov 13, 2014 6:17 PM
#349
| Yikes, forgot about that scene. Definitely fetishism.... |
Nov 15, 2014 1:10 PM
#350
| In my opinion I always see fanservice in anime as anti-feminist ... but the main reason is because the characters are almost always under 18 years old and it really creeps me out. |
More topics from this board
» Fruits Basket???holysauron - Aug 25, 2019 |
12 |
by removed-user
»»
May 9, 2022 7:27 PM |
|
» • women working on anime: recommendations?aku333 - Apr 5, 2020 |
5 |
by removed-user
»»
May 9, 2022 7:10 PM |
|
» Study materialholysauron - Apr 10, 2018 |
3 |
by Moonspeak
»»
May 6, 2022 9:54 AM |
|
» Feminist television and mini-seriesAngemars - Sep 16, 2016 |
5 |
by Zoldra0
»»
Feb 4, 2022 9:06 AM |
|
» What are your favourite anime/manga and why?daisys - Dec 3, 2021 |
1 |
by Zoldra0
»»
Feb 4, 2022 8:58 AM |
