Forum Settings
Forums

Charlie Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), was assassinated at a during a Utah Valley University event.

New
Yesterday, 1:49 PM
#1

Offline
Aug 2022
4150
https://www.deseret.com/utah/2025/09/10/charlie-kirk-shot/

Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah on Wednesday.

Bystanders report seeing Kirk shot near his neck during a Q&A with students.

Donald Trump has personally announced Charlie Kirk is dead.
vasipi4946Yesterday, 8:26 PM
Mao said:
If you have to shit, shit! If you have to fart, fart!
Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members
Yesterday, 5:40 PM
#2

Offline
Aug 2025
60
Well, that sucks. Did not agree with the guy at all but he was still young and as far as I know, not accused of anything warranting death.

Take it from someone who has spent a lifetime wanting their abusers dead, but that shit eats you up until you are barely a human. I think wishing death on anyone is tragic, not merely because someone may not deserve to die, but that it is such a terrible thing to want in the first place. What tragedies have to befall someone, what shortcomings must one have, to wish murder and death on others? That to me is a tragedy.

Life has value, and a good person would be sad if a life is taken, even if it is necessary as in cases of self-defense. Not want it. Refer to my Ursula K. LeGuin quote in my signature.
"Have we not eaten while another starved? Will you punish us for that? Will you reward us for the virtue of starving while others ate? No man earns punishment, no man earns reward. Free your mind of the idea of deserving, the idea of earning, and you will begin to be able to think.”
Yesterday, 7:18 PM
#3
Offline
Dec 2022
4294
Nowadays America looks much more like a third world country based on how the events are unfolded.
Yesterday, 8:26 PM
#4

Offline
Aug 2022
4150
NO SUSPECT HAS BEEN FOUND
Mao said:
If you have to shit, shit! If you have to fart, fart!
Today, 1:46 AM
#5

Offline
Apr 2012
24398
It really bothers me how, instead of condemning political violence in general, people are now debating whether it can be justified for certain views or statements. I too was a black sheep for various reasons as a child and I too had edgy thoughts about people who were my abusers or whom I perceived as such. But political violence cannot be normalized by any argument. If you allow it, you open Pandora's box.
Today, 3:38 AM
#6
Cat Hater

Offline
Feb 2017
9929
"politically motivated murder"

I feel bad, but Charlie has been shilling for the Republicans for almost a decade. And yet, it what only 2 months after dropping this that he got murdered:



While violence is bad, one of the dumbest moves a political commentator could do was get behind Trump on the Epstein case.
Today, 4:17 AM
#7

Offline
Apr 2012
24398
Reply to 149597871
"politically motivated murder"

I feel bad, but Charlie has been shilling for the Republicans for almost a decade. And yet, it what only 2 months after dropping this that he got murdered:



While violence is bad, one of the dumbest moves a political commentator could do was get behind Trump on the Epstein case.
@149597871 If you have to specifically remind someone that you are against violence when you comment on someone's murder, then that already means that you are doing something wrong.
10 hours ago
#8

Offline
Jul 2021
10368
Reply to RobertBobert
It really bothers me how, instead of condemning political violence in general, people are now debating whether it can be justified for certain views or statements. I too was a black sheep for various reasons as a child and I too had edgy thoughts about people who were my abusers or whom I perceived as such. But political violence cannot be normalized by any argument. If you allow it, you open Pandora's box.
@RobertBobert I'm sure there are a lot of unhinged people actually celebrating this...
Anti-aliasing enthusiast
10 hours ago
#9

Offline
Apr 2012
24398
Reply to JaniSIr
@RobertBobert I'm sure there are a lot of unhinged people actually celebrating this...
@JaniSIr You don't have to tell me about it. I already know of at least a couple of cases where people got fired for making jokes or endorsing it. DC even canceled an entire comic book series after the author made fun of it.
10 hours ago

Offline
Aug 2025
60
Reply to RobertBobert
It really bothers me how, instead of condemning political violence in general, people are now debating whether it can be justified for certain views or statements. I too was a black sheep for various reasons as a child and I too had edgy thoughts about people who were my abusers or whom I perceived as such. But political violence cannot be normalized by any argument. If you allow it, you open Pandora's box.
@RobertBobert It feels odd, but I feel more inclined to say Brian Thompson was deserving of death than Charlie Kirk. I mean yes, Charlie Kirk's words and ideology did hurt people and led to widespread suffering which no doubt contributed to deaths, making the world a worst place.

On the other hand, using violence against speech and ideology we disagree is inherently fascist, even if said person in question is a fascist.

Deserve is such a dirty word, honestly. Please refer to my forum signature. Obsessing over what is deserved can be damaging to us as human beings.

Though I can see the point @149597871 made. While I am fairly sure it was likely a left-leaning individual who loathed Kirk's beliefs, I cannot rule out the possibility it was someone right or center or left who was upset over Epstein. Kirk was a part of the administration. To which yeah? I think if that was the reason, I would have a harder time condemning the murderer.

I understand violence, even political violence, when the laws fail us. It is a Ken Rex McElroy situation. Again, we do not know who the shooter is, much less their motivation. Of course, I see some motivations as more sympathetic than others.

Also, don't watch the fucking video. I have not, and my life is better for it.
PeripheralVision10 hours ago
"Have we not eaten while another starved? Will you punish us for that? Will you reward us for the virtue of starving while others ate? No man earns punishment, no man earns reward. Free your mind of the idea of deserving, the idea of earning, and you will begin to be able to think.”
10 hours ago

Offline
Apr 2012
24398
Reply to PeripheralVision
@RobertBobert It feels odd, but I feel more inclined to say Brian Thompson was deserving of death than Charlie Kirk. I mean yes, Charlie Kirk's words and ideology did hurt people and led to widespread suffering which no doubt contributed to deaths, making the world a worst place.

On the other hand, using violence against speech and ideology we disagree is inherently fascist, even if said person in question is a fascist.

Deserve is such a dirty word, honestly. Please refer to my forum signature. Obsessing over what is deserved can be damaging to us as human beings.

Though I can see the point @149597871 made. While I am fairly sure it was likely a left-leaning individual who loathed Kirk's beliefs, I cannot rule out the possibility it was someone right or center or left who was upset over Epstein. Kirk was a part of the administration. To which yeah? I think if that was the reason, I would have a harder time condemning the murderer.

I understand violence, even political violence, when the laws fail us. It is a Ken Rex McElroy situation. Again, we do not know who the shooter is, much less their motivation. Of course, I see some motivations as more sympathetic than others.

Also, don't watch the fucking video. I have not, and my life is better for it.
@PeripheralVision The words fascist and nazism have long since lost their meaning after people started using it as a label that meant "I think this person's views are bad." And I say this as a person with Jewish roots. As one YouTuber, a black one by the way, said, if you disagree with someone's views, ignore them or prove them wrong. Otherwise, you're just starting a cycle of violence that may eventually come back to haunt you. For my part, I can say that if you think that their words violate any laws, go to court. Violence is not the solution.
10 hours ago

Offline
Aug 2025
60
Reply to RobertBobert
@PeripheralVision The words fascist and nazism have long since lost their meaning after people started using it as a label that meant "I think this person's views are bad." And I say this as a person with Jewish roots. As one YouTuber, a black one by the way, said, if you disagree with someone's views, ignore them or prove them wrong. Otherwise, you're just starting a cycle of violence that may eventually come back to haunt you. For my part, I can say that if you think that their words violate any laws, go to court. Violence is not the solution.
@RobertBobert I think the words are apt here. Violence and coercion is intrinsically embedded into the framework of fascism, and one way to condemn something is to describe as the practice of something else that is considered widely bad.

Ruling with violence is bad, and it is a tool of fascism. Of course, not all violence arises from a fascist ideology, but that does not render violence of this nature and purpose not fascist in its effects. People should not be living in fear that they will be killed for their views. That is fascistic.

Being Jewish does not make you an expert anymore than citing a black youtuber.
PeripheralVision10 hours ago
"Have we not eaten while another starved? Will you punish us for that? Will you reward us for the virtue of starving while others ate? No man earns punishment, no man earns reward. Free your mind of the idea of deserving, the idea of earning, and you will begin to be able to think.”
9 hours ago

Offline
Apr 2012
24398
Reply to PeripheralVision
@RobertBobert I think the words are apt here. Violence and coercion is intrinsically embedded into the framework of fascism, and one way to condemn something is to describe as the practice of something else that is considered widely bad.

Ruling with violence is bad, and it is a tool of fascism. Of course, not all violence arises from a fascist ideology, but that does not render violence of this nature and purpose not fascist in its effects. People should not be living in fear that they will be killed for their views. That is fascistic.

Being Jewish does not make you an expert anymore than citing a black youtuber.
@PeripheralVision Violence? To rule by violence? Sorry, what violence did Kirk use and what or who did he rule? If you think you can call anything violence to contrasting that he was a victim of violence, that's not how it works. And yes, don't tell a Jew what fascism is, please. Over 30 of my relatives were killed in the Holocaust just because of their ethnicity. Fascism is a much more dangerous and scary thing than just a person telling you something you don't want to hear.
RobertBobert9 hours ago
9 hours ago

Offline
Aug 2025
60
Reply to RobertBobert
@PeripheralVision Violence? To rule by violence? Sorry, what violence did Kirk use and what or who did he rule? If you think you can call anything violence to contrasting that he was a victim of violence, that's not how it works. And yes, don't tell a Jew what fascism is, please. Over 30 of my relatives were killed in the Holocaust just because of their ethnicity. Fascism is a much more dangerous and scary thing than just a person telling you something you don't want to hear.
@RobertBobert

I said politically motivated murder was fascistic violence, unless you were referring to me calling Kirk a fascist, which I think is besides the point here? I mean, I think he is because of his far-right political beliefs which call for systemic discrimination against minorities, his attacks on history and alliance with those who wish to destroy history, and all that, but I still do not think that is a justification for actual political violence.

It would feel weird to me to discuss in this particular thread whether or not he was a fascist, as if we should be discussing the merits of his murder. You can DM me if you want, but I don't think we should be continuing this sort of discussion in any form.

And yes, don't tell a Jew what fascism is, please.


...I am sorry to say, but I was under the impression that Jewish people are not born with a degree in Holocaust Studies, or a degree in political science, or had the final say what a category as broad as "fascism" and "fascist" should include. Of course we would differ, I suppose, but anyway...

Being a member of X group does not necessarily make you an expert on a member of X group, especially when multiple groups of people were subjected to fascistic violence throughout history. Listen, I am considered the most stereotypical leftist on the forums, and even you are utilizing identity politics in a way that embarrasses me.

Mentioning 30 of your own relatives murdered in a Holocaust here? In this context? What the heck dude? Can't we just agree to disagree because we agree that whatever his political affiliation or label applied to him, it is still murder?
"Have we not eaten while another starved? Will you punish us for that? Will you reward us for the virtue of starving while others ate? No man earns punishment, no man earns reward. Free your mind of the idea of deserving, the idea of earning, and you will begin to be able to think.”
9 hours ago

Offline
Apr 2012
24398
Reply to PeripheralVision
@RobertBobert

I said politically motivated murder was fascistic violence, unless you were referring to me calling Kirk a fascist, which I think is besides the point here? I mean, I think he is because of his far-right political beliefs which call for systemic discrimination against minorities, his attacks on history and alliance with those who wish to destroy history, and all that, but I still do not think that is a justification for actual political violence.

It would feel weird to me to discuss in this particular thread whether or not he was a fascist, as if we should be discussing the merits of his murder. You can DM me if you want, but I don't think we should be continuing this sort of discussion in any form.

And yes, don't tell a Jew what fascism is, please.


...I am sorry to say, but I was under the impression that Jewish people are not born with a degree in Holocaust Studies, or a degree in political science, or had the final say what a category as broad as "fascism" and "fascist" should include. Of course we would differ, I suppose, but anyway...

Being a member of X group does not necessarily make you an expert on a member of X group, especially when multiple groups of people were subjected to fascistic violence throughout history. Listen, I am considered the most stereotypical leftist on the forums, and even you are utilizing identity politics in a way that embarrasses me.

Mentioning 30 of your own relatives murdered in a Holocaust here? In this context? What the heck dude? Can't we just agree to disagree because we agree that whatever his political affiliation or label applied to him, it is still murder?
@PeripheralVision This is why I brought this up, because as a Jew it is very painful for me to see how people dilute the negative power of this word by simply turning it into a popular label in political online debates. Thanks to the experience and history of my family and country, I unfortunately could already be convinced of how fraught this is.

I don't think that simply opposing the left and liberals through open public debate without any violence or discrimination/calling for it makes you far-right. Kirk was a typical traditionalist conservative who criticized new social phenomena because it contradicted his views on life. Of course, some of his positions or opinions were clearly reactionary. For example, his overly religious view on abortion, where he perceived Christianity as the ultimate truth in health issues, but with the same logic you can call a far-leftist any person who quotes atheist activists in a moral debate.

But I don't think there's any particular point in continuing this casuistic argument if we both agree that political violence is unacceptable, regardless of your views.
8 hours ago
Cat Hater

Offline
Feb 2017
9929
Reply to RobertBobert
@149597871 If you have to specifically remind someone that you are against violence when you comment on someone's murder, then that already means that you are doing something wrong.
@RobertBobert

I agree with you, but then again, raping children and covering up for child traffickers is also wrong.
8 hours ago

Offline
Apr 2012
24398
Reply to 149597871
@RobertBobert

I agree with you, but then again, raping children and covering up for child traffickers is also wrong.
@149597871 The fact that you really expected that I wouldn't understand that this is bait and would start arguing with you really offends me.
Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members

More topics from this board

» Live Updates: Russia Invades Ukraine From Land and Sea ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

deg - Feb 23, 2022

2109 by vasipi4946 »»
Yesterday, 6:13 PM

» Daily News In a Brief ( 1 2 3 4 )

vasipi4946 - Feb 23

194 by vasipi4946 »»
Yesterday, 7:03 AM

» Israel/US - Iran War News ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

removed-user - Oct 6, 2023

341 by vasipi4946 »»
Sep 9, 11:07 AM

» After Assad Syria News ( 1 2 )

vasipi4946 - Dec 9, 2024

85 by vasipi4946 »»
Sep 8, 2:17 PM

» Radical libertarian Javier Milei seizes victory in Argentina presidential election

Freshell - Nov 19, 2023

23 by vasipi4946 »»
Sep 8, 12:07 AM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login