Luxray241 said: This series so far didn't disappointed me, the first episode seem not really good but it's getting better, but the rating is still nothing but drop, i remember the first episode got 6.9, now drop down to 6.45, if it's just rated by some salty kids who can't watch more than 2 episode, why it can be happened, srl, this anime deserve a 7.x or even 7.5x rating. Can't understand @@ because most people don't want to watch a show that has a lot of talk and no action. + the art somewhat makes people feel off about it |
Luxray241 said: This anime is pure fan service for those who played the game and I think that is a small part of MAL's users. This adaptation doesn't stand on its own, has basic animation (lot of people care about this), and even worse character design compared to the game which is really a bad thing. Instead of doing an anime that is more fluent and fits better this medium they chose to be more faithful betting everything on the franchise fanbase.This series so far didn't disappointed me, the first episode seem not really good but it's getting better, but the rating is still nothing but drop, i remember the first episode got 6.9, now drop down to 6.45, if it's just rated by some salty kids who can't watch more than 2 episode, why it can be happened, srl, this anime deserve a 7.x or even 7.5x rating. Can't understand @@ Since I played the game I like it, but It is not that good. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Azami said: The art and animation are so poorly done it's painful to look at. And there's absolutely no intrigue whatsoever since they decided to show the guilty side from the start of the case. That's only for the first two cases I believe. Besides, the killer have always been obvious in the Ace Attorney games. |
 |
Azami said: The art and animation are so poorly done it's painful to look at. And there's absolutely no intrigue whatsoever since they decided to show the guilty side from the start of the case. The only do that in the first two cases, since they are the "Tutorial" and "Easy" cases respectively |
| I think some people might’ve been angry that the story follows the exact same beats as the game, but personally that is what I expected... So far, I’m liking the show. |
| It just wasn't that good. As a game it works great, but the anime felt off. |
Xushu said: Azami said: The art and animation are so poorly done it's painful to look at. And there's absolutely no intrigue whatsoever since they decided to show the guilty side from the start of the case. That's only for the first two cases I believe. Besides, the killer have always been obvious in the Ace Attorney games. As a anime viewer expecting a anime about the court of law... I don't see how the killer being obvious matters at all. It's not a detective show. It's a courtroom show. Good or bad, the law of court doesn't really determine guilt. It's to convince the jury of guilt or lack of guilt. It may seem the same, but it's not The court room is about argumentation rather than pure evidence. Evidence is only used to strengthen an argument. The prosecution would not use evidence that hurts their case. Same goes for the defense. Even if the defense lawyer KNOWS his client is wrong, they are legally bound to defend him/her. For me this is why I didn't bother passed the 1st episode. The title and description made me think it was a court case not a investigation. The investigation should of been done prior to the court hearing. |
 |
| I mean the show looks like ass so that's a giveaway. |
zcv45 said: Xushu said: That's only for the first two cases I believe. Besides, the killer have always been obvious in the Ace Attorney games. As a anime viewer expecting a anime about the court of law... I don't see how the killer being obvious matters at all. It's not a detective show. It's a courtroom show. Good or bad, the law of court doesn't really determine guilt. It's to convince the jury of guilt or lack of guilt. It may seem the same, but it's not The court room is about argumentation rather than pure evidence. Evidence is only used to strengthen an argument. The prosecution would not use evidence that hurts their case. Same goes for the defense. Even if the defense lawyer KNOWS his client is wrong, they are legally bound to defend him/her. For me this is why I didn't bother passed the 1st episode. The title and description made me think it was a court case not a investigation. The investigation should of been done prior to the court hearing. In the games, it's a mix of courtroom and investigations. Basically the gist is, in Japan (or USA in localisation), the court system is too overworked and so now, each trial must end within 3 days. And the défense lawyer does a lot of investigation at least phoenix Wright does... Lol Even in courtroom drama TV show you see this. Take for example Bull, in between days of court they are always looking for more info just in case they need it |
     |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Gyakuten Saiban: Sono "Shinjitsu", Igi Ari! Episode 17 DiscussionStark700 - Jul 30, 2016 |
45 |
by AwesomeAli2832
»»
Sep 11, 7:34 PM |
|
Poll: » Gyakuten Saiban: Sono "Shinjitsu", Igi Ari! Episode 16 DiscussionStark700 - Jul 23, 2016 |
36 |
by AwesomeAli2832
»»
Sep 11, 6:36 PM |
|
Poll: » Gyakuten Saiban: Sono "Shinjitsu", Igi Ari! Episode 15 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Jul 16, 2016 |
51 |
by AwesomeAli2832
»»
Sep 10, 10:22 PM |
|
Poll: » Gyakuten Saiban: Sono "Shinjitsu", Igi Ari! Episode 14 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Jul 9, 2016 |
63 |
by AwesomeAli2832
»»
Sep 10, 7:36 PM |
|
Poll: » Gyakuten Saiban: Sono "Shinjitsu", Igi Ari! Episode 13 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Jun 25, 2016 |
85 |
by AwesomeAli2832
»»
Sep 10, 5:51 PM |