| Well... here's what I mean. We have a lot of people on the earth. The earth only has so much water, and other resources. We're so wasteful and not many people focus on worldly issues, and more on their personal life. Do you believe we are slowly, but effectively killing ourselves? Will we ever solve issues like overpopulation and others? |
| no way son, new things will be invented to solve these problems |
| I'd swear this is exactly like lupadim's stupid meat thread that caused me to get myself banned... Does that mean that OP is lupadim? |
| No. |
| Proud founder of the 20+ virgins club. Please visit my manga blog for manga updates and more! Mup da doo didda po mo muhfuggen bix nood ^ Need someone who can translate this. Pm me pls. |
Ntad said: I'd swear this is exactly like lupadim's stupid meat thread that caused me to get myself banned... Not sure what meat thread we're talking about... (new to forums) |
| If we can perfect de salination we will have enough water to give us breathing room to invent a way to cleanse urine on an international scale. The reason people focus on their personal life is because, unless they have a phD in a related field there isn't really a whole lot they can realistically achieve beyond using less power and driving a hybrid car and the like. I know a guy who runs his house entirely of hydro power, so I personally am not screwed as I can kick back at his house. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
BarryManilow said: If we can perfect de salination we will have enough water to give us breathing room to invent a way to cleanse urine on an international scale. The reason people focus on their personal life is because, unless they have a phD in a related field there isn't really a whole lot they can realistically achieve beyond using less power and driving a hybrid car and the like. I know a guy who runs his house entirely of hydro power, so I personally am not screwed as I can kick back at his house. But will we ever (referring to first part? We've been connected to other nations that ever before. Contacting other political powers or other powers is more simply than ever. And yet it seems like issues arise left and right. |
| The problem isn't resource use. Its largely poor management. Be it politically, industrially, or a lot of other factors. While Democracy has given people more and more freedom, saddly they often are morons that vote for who has the nicest teeth, then that guy has no clue what he's doing, and hires his even more clueless brother to work with him. Next thing you know you wake up and water is being used to pump out oil. |
| Thomas Robert Malthus called it. So long ago too. The man is a prophet. |
| [size=200]MAL AVATAR SYSTEM BLOWS |
j0x said: and Solar FlaresParaParaJMo said: I am more worried about a meteor and its affects and Super Volcanoes |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| Not in our generation |
Nyaaaria- said: You really are the king of marathoning  |
| We're not exactly screwed- there is a significant chance that the internet will stop being a thing before you stop being. ...but the internet isn't much older than you anyway, so the world will definitely keep functioning, without issue. There might be a few people who get ballsy and try to start a revolt, for no apparent reason other than teen angst, but they will find out real quickly how the world actually operates if they do... |
| It will be a concern after 2100, no need to panic. |
 |
| With this generation, they'll find a way to prevent if from happening. |
 |
| Nah. Human ingenuity will find a way like it always does. |
 |
Hoppy said: It will be a concern after 2100, no need to panic. Who needs the next generation of people? |
 |
Depressant said: We have a lot of people on the earth. Actually, no. Everyone in the world could stand shoulder to shoulder in a crowd no larger than L.A. And if you had everyone on earth living in the same city, under normal conditions, that city would fit within the borders of Texas. We use enough farmland for ethanol to feed every starving orphan in Africa, easily. Why don't we? Why don't they mine and sell the trillions of dollars worth of diamonds they have, and use that money to buy food, instead of fund civil wars? Cause people are stupid. |
sargos7Apr 21, 2014 6:46 PM
Zetrin said: Going by what I think of previous generations they're just going to judge our choices and fashion sense. Hoppy said: It will be a concern after 2100, no need to panic. Who needs the next generation of people? So fuck them. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
sargos7 said: Depressant said: We have a lot of people on the earth. We use enough farmland for ethanol to feed every starving orphan in Africa, easily. Why don't we? Why don't they mine and sell the trillions of dollars worth of diamonds they have? Cause people are stupid. Feeding people in Africa would cost quite a lot of money? They already mine the diamonds, not exactly working out, though |
|
Hoppy said: Fuck them, those little ingrate bastards keeping ruining society.It will be a concern after 2100, no need to panic. |
Depressant said: Overpopulation is not a problem. Mismanagement of our resources and technology is a problem.Well... here's what I mean. We have a lot of people on the earth. The earth only has so much water, and other resources. We're so wasteful and not many people focus on worldly issues, and more on their personal life. Do you believe we are slowly, but effectively killing ourselves? Will we ever solve issues like overpopulation and others? Gas as 10% ethanol? Stupidity. Gums up your car and makes it wear a whole lot sooner, and takes corn out of the global food supply. Mismanagement. Since we're on the topic of corn... let's talk corn. American "corn" = maize; in general the word "corn" means "the principal grain of a country or region." In grains alone in the year 2000, there was enough food to feed the world population twice over. That's not counting meat, dairy, legumes, fruits, or other vegetables. So the fact that 10% of the world's population (then) was going hungry was clearly not a problem with the food supply, but with management of that food supply: or mismanagement. Government subsidies that make certain food crops economically viable. Yes, this is your government paying farmers to plant stuff that otherwise would not be financially viable (soybeans) and then instead of planting other (less lucrative) crops there ensues a huge surplus of said subsidized crops, which, due to glutted markets, often just rot away in storehouses, unable to be sold. Mismanagement. Bleaching grains for use in highly processed foods, reducing its nutritional value because such foods and sweets are more desirable than nutritious ones. Mismanagement. GMO foods that corrupt natural food stocks. Not an issue now since they are commercially successful and still relatively edible. What if pests become resistant to pesticides used on such crops? What if mutated or corrupted strains overtake usable ones? Depleted soil due to overfarming of agricultural lands, resulting in topsoil erosion and less arable landspace. Mismanagement. It's all about mismanagement. And you could argue that mismanagement is the result of human greed. We're not going to completely obliterate ourselves, but we may make a world that cannot sustain as many human beings as before |
| I seem to recall someone in the 1800's coming up with a similar theory about humans reaching a tipping point and the population dropping off sharply by the end of that century. It didn't happen though because exponential technological growth was not factored in to our population growth. Technological advancement has not only continued to grow exponentially in the last 10 years, it has actually started to grow even faster and has outpaced the predictions of scientists near the turn of the century. There is also the fact that there is a correlation between developed nations and lower birth rates as the countries with the highest birth rates are the ones that are usually the poorest. Makes since if you factor in the fact that even if you have a great year and your economy grows by 7% it means nothing if your population grows by 9% in that year as you are still 2% in the hole overall and are still worse off. Eventually, barring any major nuclear wars or other disasters developing countries will start to have a drop off in population growth but if anything technological growth is looking to continue to keep growing exponentially, especially with quantum computing becoming more and more feasible in the coming years. This will lead in my opinion to a tipping point where the population is no longer keeping pace with technological growth and we will be getting better and better over time. The only real question is whether we can keep our current global society together long enough to reach this tipping point. |
SGWApr 21, 2014 7:23 PM
| If you pretend to feel a certain way, the feeling can become genuine all by accident. — Hei |
SGW said: Yes, Malthus.I seem to recall someone in the 1800's coming up with a similar theory about humans reaching a tipping point and the population dropping off sharply by the end of that century. It didn't happen though because exponential technological growth was not factored in to our population growth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Robert_Malthus |
| yes Malthus was his name. Thank you Jackrabb1t |
| If you pretend to feel a certain way, the feeling can become genuine all by accident. — Hei |
Jackrabb1t said: SGW said: Yes, Malthus.I seem to recall someone in the 1800's coming up with a similar theory about humans reaching a tipping point and the population dropping off sharply by the end of that century. It didn't happen though because exponential technological growth was not factored in to our population growth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Robert_Malthus SGW said: yes Malthus was his name. Thank you Jackrabb1t Fuck you guys. I mentioned him first. |
| [size=200]MAL AVATAR SYSTEM BLOWS |
| i'm not worried because by the time the earth is fucked up we will all probably be dead by then |
| RRRRRRRRRR |
DerpHole said: HIPSTER!Jackrabb1t said: SGW said: Yes, Malthus.I seem to recall someone in the 1800's coming up with a similar theory about humans reaching a tipping point and the population dropping off sharply by the end of that century. It didn't happen though because exponential technological growth was not factored in to our population growth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Robert_Malthus SGW said: yes Malthus was his name. Thank you Jackrabb1t Fuck you guys. I mentioned him first. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
DerpHole said: Oh yeah well I have his autograph. He signed a copy of his book for me at one of those meet the author things.Jackrabb1t said: SGW said: Yes, Malthus.I seem to recall someone in the 1800's coming up with a similar theory about humans reaching a tipping point and the population dropping off sharply by the end of that century. It didn't happen though because exponential technological growth was not factored in to our population growth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Robert_Malthus SGW said: yes Malthus was his name. Thank you Jackrabb1t Fuck you guys. I mentioned him first. |
| I will be dead by the time this becomes a huge problem. No worries here. |
| Dont worry, Aliens will save us. |
"I have been wielding a blade since before your were swimming around your father's scrotum." - Kurou |
| No, the earth was just asking to be drilled from numerous holes until it's precious resources were depleted, and then deforested. I mean...just look at what it was wearing. |
| Eat people. |
| The most important things in life is the people that you care about |
azzuRe said: *Pulls out pencil and paper* Check.Eat people. |
| Aaron Static best explains it here in the first part of the song. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3nKl8z98IM If you're using [yt] tags: |
| I highly doubt it. |
cabacc2 said: j0x said: that was a great video.watch this its about the science of overpopulation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD-yN2G5BY0 and yes we are screwed, but once humanity is extinct then earth will just evolve a new intelligent lifeform that will be extinct again due to overpopulation and the cycle continues That was a stupid and politicalized video. iiSamurai said: j0x said: ParaParaJMo said: I am more worried about a meteor and its affects and Super Volcanoes Yellowstone SV is over due an eruption Rather funny how many dooms day type things are just waiting. The Canary Islands are another that would screw over parts of Europe and the US East coast. |
More topics from this board
» movies that define Spooky/Halloween season for youame - 23 minutes ago |
0 |
by ame
»»
23 minutes ago |
|
» When should one be moderate?getah_karet - Today |
8 |
by deg
»»
42 minutes ago |
|
» Do you actually like the food associated with your country or culture?fleurbleue - Yesterday |
29 |
by deg
»»
55 minutes ago |
|
» Have you ever seen the northern lights?waferish - Sep 13 |
30 |
by RainyEvenings
»»
1 hour ago |
|
» The Rise Of AI? ( 1 2 )DigiCat - Oct 2 |
51 |
by deg
»»
1 hour ago |