RedArmyShogun said: Ah I see.
Ehh its a bit complicated in that issue. As Putin or the Chinese put it "This is our peoples understanding and way of democracy"
For instance in the US the State generally is wanted to be kept at bay, in the East its wanted to have as much control and be as strong as possible, in Europe they could care less as long as they can dress fancy.
As to Russia, no I don't live there, alot of people assume I do though, but I studied them in great detail, been there a couple of times and I trained alongside a few of their people, I used to be able to speak a great deal of Russian, I can still translate its writing however, though not as well as when it was in use, and I had more interactions with them in my country than vise versa.
In general however to answer you, mind you I minus a few civil interactions, only had professional dealings with the Russian people, luckly Russians get drunk or are normally pretty open in a closed setting emotionally, but they generally want these things.
A good economy, a strong large population, and a strong state, that is seen equally by other nations. Russians can also be a bit greedy I've noticed, but are generally friendly and brotherly, though recent events post soviet collapse has left the country with a bit of sorrow. Most of them also see the west as a a friend that wants to be its enemy. Most Russians Love people from pretty much anywhere, so long as you don't disrupt Russia, however they don't like most governments.
The Younger Urbanites tend to graviate towards western views on democracy, but they are by and large a devided minority.
The collapse of the USSR and its aftermath was not rememberd fondly by the russian people. So in general, and with the color revolts of the east, while there is sympathy, or apathy toward the plights of those like pussy riot, its as they see them as a threat to stability, which russians value over anything else, given tis long turbelant history.
While the activist might have scored some points, when you deface churches, or historical icons, the Russians can hold long standing grudges. More so if they see all you want to do is crush the state and stability.
Its not a matter of right and wrong, so much as a matter of perspective.
Long story short, what happens to some of these groups is seen as being deserved. And if not for respect of law, would be worse. Note that none of these activist have been killed, and its not as there is a shortage of arms in Russia, Russia has a histroically strong arm society, tow the line or get your ass beaten, even its Army operates in this manner.
Put it like this in the US Back inthe 90's Early 2000's when this one fellow went around blowing up abortion clenics in the South, the locals mostly seen him as a hero, the North as a villian, because of popular support, he evaded capture for years untill they caught him in the mountains of North Carolina. Or take in to account the protest sweeping France in count of its new pro homosexual laws.
I doubt in either of those cases either side thinks they are wrong, and would say in general what people thinks is wrong is no doubt leading the nation to hell. If I am wrong on this we have plenty of Russian posters here, that can correct me, as I said my dealings were mostly on a limited end with the Russian society, naturally military circles tend to be pro order and nationally.
Edit for typo's typo's everywhere.
I agree with you that that's exactly how a democracy is. However, many principles regarding civil rights have nothing to do with democracy and are more compatible with republics (republic = there is restraint on the government, and certain rights cannot be taken away regardless of what the government; which, in a democracy, is the majority; wants). I'm not saying that there's anything inherently wrong with the way things are run in Russia or anywhere for that matter. What I am saying is that when it comes to the proposition of maintaining certain rights for all people, the type of government/society does come into play. Ex - In Russia it is contradictory to draft a constitution in which each citizen has inalienable rights and then have the government/people act in certain ways. If you want a strong state that can do anything, then you cant have inalienable rights really.
I actually know a lot of Russian and Eastern European immigrants and grew up with them since I'm from NYC where they all live lol. I know what theyre like generally. I dont think theyre assholes, they are just straightforward, which i prefer anyway.
All I was saying is that when you say "they are OK with you as long as you dont disrupt Russia", that basically means that minorities cant really get away with protesting despite what the Russian constitution says. Again, i agree with you regarding the persepectives. f i were a woman in Russia, i would not take to the streets and try to peacefully protest because of what I know of both the society and the government - Russian societ is not American, Canadian, etc society. I dont expect everybody in the world to follow American society , which is why i said that those woman would probably be better off moving to America |