Time to be constructive.
This feels rushed.
It looks like you had completely no idea what to put there, so you took Naruto and Attack on Titan, gathered some Buzzfeed-like articles and slapped them on a page. A page which can't decide how it wants to look, so it has five different designs at once:
- four articles with large covers and animations (!), and with black link color (as opposed to blue everywhere else),
- list of articles with smaller images,
- three MORE lists of articles, with DUPLICATES from the previous lists,
- list of four columnists, which is completely useless for anyone (just links to profiles, no other info about their articles),
- tag cloud.
(And then there's an RSS Feed button out of nowhere! What is this a feed of? It's under tags, so the intuition says I'd subscribe to new tags.)
From these five, you could change it to three and not lose any meaningful functionality. Keep large article covers, but only put remarkable ones there. The list below is fine. The tag cloud might be changed to a vertical list in the sidebar, allowing it to grow while keeping it readable, and adding space for RSS feed link for each separate tag.
The animations in covers are the worst part. This steals the focus from other content, which will lead to all articles using gifs in covers. Try to imagine how hard it would be to skim through when you're looking for something interesting to read.
Most of the articles are tagged as Spoilers, but the spoiling text is visible in the summary anyway.
Tags are rounded, while all other page elements are rectangular.
1px wide lines under headers are dark gray, while all other lines are light gray.
"More" link is emboldened, while "View more" and "All Tags" are not.
"All Tags" uses the terrible, terrible Title Case (as do tags), while "View more" does not.
Some articles use Title Case, while some don't. (My personal plea is to use Sentence case for titles, so they don't look like taken directly from Buzzfeed.)
The ENTIRE page is titled "featured articles", but I can't really see how they're featured. My understanding of the word is that the article has to be exceptional, worth reading or something. But right now everything is featured, so nothing is. (Or maybe the "featured" part relates to the top four articles with large covers? Who knows...)
Again, it feels completely rushed. If you wanted to make a better impression, you could have asked some people privately to write original, interesting articles about something other than Naruto, and THEN open the page to the public. Right now it's blatantly pandering to the lowest common denominator, which makes me want to add this whole /featured thing to my list "parts of MAL I stay away from". |