(SPOILER)
The author removed the titans and replaced them with wars, giving the idea that he threw the whole plot in the trash without giving a better ending to the work.
The Vision of Eren's future because of the titan, it's because of these ideas that I think the author really didn't follow the original idea of survival and took it to a more "time travel" side.
I really like Chrono Trigger, but from the very beginning of the game's plot, it makes it clear that it will address the "time travel" theme and we accept this naturally, but in the case of Attack on Titan, why to me does it sound as if the author has forced this theme into the work? It is not very natural for this to happen or to appear in a work where the premise was "survival".
Gods and mythology I even understand, because there would be no scientific explanation for it. This theme pleases me, I liked being approached and giving a more divine (or demonic) air to the work.
To me, having given such an important role to Mikasa and Eren, is very convenient to do and sounds like laziness from the author in not having done something more developed. Unless: It is portraying a cycle that repeats itself from generation after generation of a couple who are stuck in that kind of fatality or choice of fate.
If not, it sounds very "lazy".
In the end, I still possess in my mind the original identity of the series that I saw in the first season:
Men vs. Titans
For me, the series ended there and I am glad I didn't see anything else.
You can complain about me for only having seen the 1st season and complain about the development and the ending, but keep in mind that the series started with the clear idea that it would be about "Survival", because of that, the author would approach other subjects that were not linked to this main theme, it's his decision and I'm only portraying my opinion.
Final Note:
4/10
