If you are generally annoying or make terrible reviews I I will say it.
Don't expect much from me review wise as it's only to keep track of what I'm watching. Kengan ans eyeshield 21 ftw.
did you watch hell's paradise (dont know if you just didnt update mal or not)? I'm definitely fine with explaining my stance in greater depth in dms if you have any specific questions regarding the show based on your experience.
sorry for the liberal nonsense? but sure, I won't discuss any of it, partially because I'm tired of talking about it too.
1.) I understand the critique for the first and last paragraphs, sure. I wrote them for fun, which should be pretty obvious. That's just a stylistic choice, however, and not really a critique of what I had to say in my review. completely subjective whether those paragraphs contribute anything of note. Some people found it funny, some didn't.
2.) Also a fair criticism, you are right in that I didn't site specific examples to illustrate my point, but it was never that kind of review either. It was intended to be a spoiler free review, with two purposes in mind A.) dissuade people from watching a show I found to be terrible (but I wouldn't want to spoil them if they did decide to watch it) and B.) entertainment, which again, should be exceedingly obvious from the beginning. It was by no means a serious or deep analysis, but that's what every spoiler free review on the site is going to be. A summary of the writer's thoughts on the series.
Not denying what you said, but what I wanted to write and what you wanted to read seemingly did not align in the first place. So, sorry that my review failed to meet your formal writing requirements. It wasn't an in-depth analysis like you were looking for, but that also isn't what I set out to do with it. And thanks for the criticism, I know those aspects are needed for serious reviews, and I will be applying them in the future, just not for this kind of writing.
All Comments (11) Comments
1.) I understand the critique for the first and last paragraphs, sure. I wrote them for fun, which should be pretty obvious. That's just a stylistic choice, however, and not really a critique of what I had to say in my review. completely subjective whether those paragraphs contribute anything of note. Some people found it funny, some didn't.
2.) Also a fair criticism, you are right in that I didn't site specific examples to illustrate my point, but it was never that kind of review either. It was intended to be a spoiler free review, with two purposes in mind A.) dissuade people from watching a show I found to be terrible (but I wouldn't want to spoil them if they did decide to watch it) and B.) entertainment, which again, should be exceedingly obvious from the beginning. It was by no means a serious or deep analysis, but that's what every spoiler free review on the site is going to be. A summary of the writer's thoughts on the series.
Not denying what you said, but what I wanted to write and what you wanted to read seemingly did not align in the first place. So, sorry that my review failed to meet your formal writing requirements. It wasn't an in-depth analysis like you were looking for, but that also isn't what I set out to do with it. And thanks for the criticism, I know those aspects are needed for serious reviews, and I will be applying them in the future, just not for this kind of writing.