New
Mar 24, 2017 7:37 AM
#1201
| Just that, if you're town here, WHY THE HECK WOULD FALSECLAIM A GUILTY CHECK ON DAY 2. |
Mar 24, 2017 7:38 AM
#1202
followind said: What is this triggering? I don't get it.. ||||||||||||| ||||||||||||| ||||||||||||| ||||||||||||| *a sigh of relief* |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
Mar 24, 2017 7:42 AM
#1203
Crossbell said: Oh please, never give 100% to these messages. It still pains my heart how we lost in LOTD because of something like this and it was like more than a year ago D:I have absolutely no idea what to make of this situation. My gut thinks that Claire is town because her replace-out post sounded sincere. My brain, however, points to the fact that she falseclaimed to out the investigative power role in the game and to try to lynch Penta. Is this really another Overwatch Mafia, or is Claire just scum? Better judge her posts. Edit: mixed game name Edit 2: wait, I am still not sure if it's this game. Geh. not that it matters. |
greenwillowMar 24, 2017 7:49 AM
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 7:50 AM
#1204
| I mean, it's Claire. She's one of the best players on the site in terms of emotional appeal. She won Pirates Mafia due to me buying it, which is why I am trying to be as objective as possible about this. Part of me just wants to lynch her and just hope she flips scum, because what she just did right now was just so blatantly anti-town. It honestly would not surprise me if this was a hail mary gambit designed to fish for as many of the town power roles as possible before going down. |
Mar 24, 2017 7:54 AM
#1205
Crossbell said: I mean, it's Claire. She's one of the best players on the site in terms of emotional appeal. She won Pirates Mafia due to me buying it, which is why I am trying to be as objective as possible about this. Part of me just wants to lynch her and just hope she flips scum, because what she just did right now was just so blatantly anti-town. It honestly would not surprise me if this was a hail mary gambit designed to fish for as many of the town power roles as possible before going down. Okay well not going to argue against that. Seen it in twins. If it's a common trend then I will not fall for it o/ edit: Just a correction, but she did not want other people to claim, or at least bolded it and posted that. |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
Mar 24, 2017 7:56 AM
#1206
| @Grapefruit21 @PentaFlare What are your thoughts on the situation? I am completely lost right now, and not sure what to make of Claire falseclaiming. |
Mar 24, 2017 7:56 AM
#1207
RE1031 said: followind said: What is this triggering? I don't get it.. ||||||||||||| ||||||||||||| ||||||||||||| ||||||||||||| *a sigh of relief* Okay.. Thx for clarifying |
Mar 24, 2017 8:04 AM
#1208
| I am on page 21 now and didn't see if Penta said anywhere why did he say that CP is townie during the night. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 8:07 AM
#1209
logic340 said: Looking forward (if u didn't do it yet)Grapefruit21 said: hm....I'm here, listening and thinking. Don't have much to say I guess I'll start working this Claire iso then... |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 8:09 AM
#1210
RE1031 said: logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: Maybe logic is just scum after all. That would make today make a lot more sense. It feels like stubborn town logic but his focus on a few untrue points is absurd. Like he's mentioned RE butting in, Claire not giving meta, me not pushing Claire based on activity all like 5 times each... None of those except maybe possibly Claire giving meta mean anything at all but he keeps hammering them. Claire did give meta, it just was she didn't have a strong read on me. RE was being discussed (and he didn't have any issue with CP doing the same at the time with the Day Cop question) so chiming in makes sense. I think Claire has been as active as anyone not named logic. I'm too lazy to manually count posts in this thread but I bet Claire is top 5. And I've said most of this before but it keeps coming back up and I don't get it. So yeah he can blame this on salt too if he likes but I just don't know where logics head is at with this game. Oh and I told you Claire was lying.... can we lynch her now? If she's getting modkilled, then no. If she's getting replaced, maybe. Meanwhile we are back to square one. Which is a huge pain. We may have to read into night actions now - which means more claiming. Modkilled: This would suck but yeah makes sense to move on and see what she flips. Replacement: How the fuck are they going to answer for this? Claire just put major doubt on a more active town read player for no apparent reason. Even said she lied about town reading Penta on D1. If someone replaces I will be lynching there because I don't want to go into D3 or D4 with this question mark. What a fucking pain this is. Like it makes me think that Grapefruit is scum again.... Crossbell said: I don't know anything about overwatch. I do know about Alcatraz where she lied about a PR D2 while facing lynch pressure. She was going to be up against hit here today but this fake claim is so out there I don't see how she feels it helps town or is indicative of "town stepping up"I have absolutely no idea what to make of this situation. My gut thinks that Claire is town because her replace-out post sounded sincere. My brain, however, points to the fact that she falseclaimed to out the investigative power role in the game and to try to lynch Penta. Is this really another Overwatch Mafia, or is Claire just scum? amberwillow said: You do know that Claire has come forward and said she was lying right?PentaFlare said: this makes sense when I read it.So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. _Claire_ said: I can see where it is coming too. I would have expected anyone who was in Penta's position to be a bit more shaken, because if someone says that u visited someone when u don't have any night abilities, u are 100% sure that that person is lying. And Penta here looks a bit emotionally reserved? But he creats/created his case on Claire pretty well. So while I see Claire's point on this, it's not that easy to be sure of how one would behave in certain situations. (I can say so, because CP looked too calm to me and that bothered me, but he fliped town, so yeah).PentaFlare said: _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. Ohh hold on you played with me, uhm.. half a year ago? more? 8 months? 9? I guess my adaption sucks because my playstyle hasnt changed since last year. Alright, so if you have adapted your game and think you can defend yourself by showing a town motivation in the way you have approached the game, you could start with the question I brought up to you about posturing a read on Corrupted. I would write it I am in the train atm, and something going on later so the read may come up late. Oh this is a very strange attitude. If you are TRULY a VT, then you should have said I were lying and such, not trying to prove my point because if you are VT you know that you are right and I am wrong. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 8:09 AM
#1211
Crossbell said: Because she is scum.Just that, if you're town here, WHY THE HECK WOULD FALSECLAIM A GUILTY CHECK ON DAY 2. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 8:11 AM
#1212
amberwillow said: No I haven't done it yet but now that she might get modkilled I don't know if I should take the time doing it? RIght now I am working on CP interactions by users so there will be a mini one for Claire since the majority of her D1 revolved around Purity. logic340 said: Looking forward (if u didn't do it yet)Grapefruit21 said: I'm here, listening and thinking. Don't have much to say I guess I'll start working this Claire iso then... Will you talk to me about Grapefruit and your opinion on him? @Crossbell same question as above please? |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 8:19 AM
#1213
_Claire_ said: This is so confusing. Let me confirmlogic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: logic340 said: vote:_Claire_ all that talk about town needs to step up now you're leaving it to mechanics and not stepping up. If Penta is truly scum then do something to help me believe this claim. You are awful gung-ho to lynch a claimed PR, I know you're scum reading Claire but it's not like she claimed under huge pressure here. Are you really willing to throw away a town PR because you're so sure of this read? I did bread-crumb I had a PR, but I lied about what kind of PR I am. See, how much you dont read my posts. It saddens me. So u soft claimed somewhere about one role, then claimed a tracker and then claimed VT? |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 8:26 AM
#1214
logic340 said: Yes, I saw that.RE1031 said: logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: I think you two are partners bro. If she flips scum you neck is next. I am so done with you this game you been hanging on to logic is scum since....your first post....get out of the tunnel and lets do some work. Maybe logic is just scum after all. That would make today make a lot more sense. It feels like stubborn town logic but his focus on a few untrue points is absurd. Like he's mentioned RE butting in, Claire not giving meta, me not pushing Claire based on activity all like 5 times each... None of those except maybe possibly Claire giving meta mean anything at all but he keeps hammering them. Claire did give meta, it just was she didn't have a strong read on me. RE was being discussed (and he didn't have any issue with CP doing the same at the time with the Day Cop question) so chiming in makes sense. I think Claire has been as active as anyone not named logic. I'm too lazy to manually count posts in this thread but I bet Claire is top 5. And I've said most of this before but it keeps coming back up and I don't get it. So yeah he can blame this on salt too if he likes but I just don't know where logics head is at with this game. Oh and I told you Claire was lying.... can we lynch her now? If she's getting modkilled, then no. If she's getting replaced, maybe. Meanwhile we are back to square one. Which is a huge pain. We may have to read into night actions now - which means more claiming. Modkilled: This would suck but yeah makes sense to move on and see what she flips. Replacement: How the fuck are they going to answer for this? Claire just put major doubt on a more active town read player for no apparent reason. Even said she lied about town reading Penta on D1. If someone replaces I will be lynching there because I don't want to go into D3 or D4 with this question mark. What a fucking pain this is. Like it makes me think that Grapefruit is scum again.... Crossbell said: I don't know anything about overwatch. I do know about Alcatraz where she lied about a PR D2 while facing lynch pressure. She was going to be up against hit here today but this fake claim is so out there I don't see how she feels it helps town or is indicative of "town stepping up"I have absolutely no idea what to make of this situation. My gut thinks that Claire is town because her replace-out post sounded sincere. My brain, however, points to the fact that she falseclaimed to out the investigative power role in the game and to try to lynch Penta. Is this really another Overwatch Mafia, or is Claire just scum? amberwillow said: You do know that Claire has come forward and said she was lying right?PentaFlare said: So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. Ohh hold on you played with me, uhm.. half a year ago? more? 8 months? 9? I guess my adaption sucks because my playstyle hasnt changed since last year. Alright, so if you have adapted your game and think you can defend yourself by showing a town motivation in the way you have approached the game, you could start with the question I brought up to you about posturing a read on Corrupted. I would write it I am in the train atm, and something going on later so the read may come up late. Oh this is a very strange attitude. If you are TRULY a VT, then you should have said I were lying and such, not trying to prove my point because if you are VT you know that you are right and I am wrong. And you do know that I am talking about Claire's point about Penta's reaction to Claire's statement that she said that she saw him visiting CP, which was before she said that she was lying? I know that she lied about being a tracker, but I still see a possibility of her being town. So, I am sorry, but I don't feel like not paying attention to everything else what she said. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 8:29 AM
#1215
amberwillow said: I'm paying attention but the way she went about trying to cast doubt on Penta is weird. Also Penta didn't slip anywhere during the interactions that I can see so if anything Claire has hindered us more in that regard. She lied about Town or Scum reading Penta to even say she had suspicion to track Penta. Why did she chose Penta who was on her from night phase? Claire was facing down suspicion so what better way to go out than cause a mislynch first?logic340 said: Yes, I saw that.RE1031 said: logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: I think you two are partners bro. If she flips scum you neck is next. I am so done with you this game you been hanging on to logic is scum since....your first post....get out of the tunnel and lets do some work. Maybe logic is just scum after all. That would make today make a lot more sense. It feels like stubborn town logic but his focus on a few untrue points is absurd. Like he's mentioned RE butting in, Claire not giving meta, me not pushing Claire based on activity all like 5 times each... None of those except maybe possibly Claire giving meta mean anything at all but he keeps hammering them. Claire did give meta, it just was she didn't have a strong read on me. RE was being discussed (and he didn't have any issue with CP doing the same at the time with the Day Cop question) so chiming in makes sense. I think Claire has been as active as anyone not named logic. I'm too lazy to manually count posts in this thread but I bet Claire is top 5. And I've said most of this before but it keeps coming back up and I don't get it. So yeah he can blame this on salt too if he likes but I just don't know where logics head is at with this game. Oh and I told you Claire was lying.... can we lynch her now? If she's getting modkilled, then no. If she's getting replaced, maybe. Meanwhile we are back to square one. Which is a huge pain. We may have to read into night actions now - which means more claiming. Modkilled: This would suck but yeah makes sense to move on and see what she flips. Replacement: How the fuck are they going to answer for this? Claire just put major doubt on a more active town read player for no apparent reason. Even said she lied about town reading Penta on D1. If someone replaces I will be lynching there because I don't want to go into D3 or D4 with this question mark. What a fucking pain this is. Like it makes me think that Grapefruit is scum again.... Crossbell said: I have absolutely no idea what to make of this situation. My gut thinks that Claire is town because her replace-out post sounded sincere. My brain, however, points to the fact that she falseclaimed to out the investigative power role in the game and to try to lynch Penta. Is this really another Overwatch Mafia, or is Claire just scum? amberwillow said: PentaFlare said: this makes sense when I read it.So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. _Claire_ said: I can see where it is coming too. I would have expected anyone who was in Penta's position to be a bit more shaken, because if someone says that u visited someone when u don't have any night abilities, u are 100% sure that that person is lying. And Penta here looks a bit emotionally reserved? But he creats/created his case on Claire pretty well. So while I see Claire's point on this, it's not that easy to be sure of how one would behave in certain situations. (I can say so, because CP looked too calm to me and that bothered me, but he fliped town, so yeah).PentaFlare said: _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. Ohh hold on you played with me, uhm.. half a year ago? more? 8 months? 9? I guess my adaption sucks because my playstyle hasnt changed since last year. Alright, so if you have adapted your game and think you can defend yourself by showing a town motivation in the way you have approached the game, you could start with the question I brought up to you about posturing a read on Corrupted. I would write it I am in the train atm, and something going on later so the read may come up late. Oh this is a very strange attitude. If you are TRULY a VT, then you should have said I were lying and such, not trying to prove my point because if you are VT you know that you are right and I am wrong. And you do know that I am talking about Claire's point about Penta's reaction to Claire's statement that she said that she saw him visiting CP, which was before she said that she was lying? I know that she lied about being a tracker, but I still see a possibility of her being town. So, I am sorry, but I don't feel like not paying attention to everything else what she said. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 8:29 AM
#1216
logic340 said: Not now, if you don't mind. I have to go out in 5-10 minutes, so I want to keep reading as much as I can, cuz it's hella hard to catch up when I don't have time and get interfered with rl matters.amberwillow said: No I haven't done it yet but now that she might get modkilled I don't know if I should take the time doing it? RIght now I am working on CP interactions by users so there will be a mini one for Claire since the majority of her D1 revolved around Purity. logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: hm....I'm here, listening and thinking. Don't have much to say I guess I'll start working this Claire iso then... Will you talk to me about Grapefruit and your opinion on him? @Crossbell same question as above please? |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 8:30 AM
#1217
amberwillow said: How does all this tell you she may actually be town? Even if she is how do we determine what we can trust from what we can't trust?_Claire_ said: This is so confusing. Let me confirmlogic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: based on yesterday I don't believe that she would have power role and I don't believe we're just throwing it away you're not even questioning it which is very concerning considering your warning at the beginning of the gamelogic340 said: vote:_Claire_ all that talk about town needs to step up now you're leaving it to mechanics and not stepping up. If Penta is truly scum then do something to help me believe this claim. You are awful gung-ho to lynch a claimed PR, I know you're scum reading Claire but it's not like she claimed under huge pressure here. Are you really willing to throw away a town PR because you're so sure of this read? I did bread-crumb I had a PR, but I lied about what kind of PR I am. See, how much you dont read my posts. It saddens me. So u soft claimed somewhere about one role, then claimed a tracker and then claimed VT? |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 8:32 AM
#1218
amberwillow said: You wouldn't take a side in the Claire/Penta argument before Claire came forward about the lie, now you want to wait on this. I cannot force you to do anything you don't want to but your unwillingness to answer my questions is making me even more suspicious of you now than I already was.logic340 said: Not now, if you don't mind. I have to go out in 5-10 minutes, so I want to keep reading as much as I can, cuz it's hella hard to catch up when I don't have time and get interfered with rl matters.amberwillow said: logic340 said: Looking forward (if u didn't do it yet)Grapefruit21 said: hm....I'm here, listening and thinking. Don't have much to say I guess I'll start working this Claire iso then... Will you talk to me about Grapefruit and your opinion on him? @Crossbell same question as above please? |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 8:33 AM
#1219
| @amberwillow I have told the host I am quitting the game so dont waste your breathe. If anything, people will pin you as scum for trying to understand me. |
Mar 24, 2017 8:33 AM
#1220
logic340 said: Indeed.amberwillow said: I'm paying attention but the way she went about trying to cast doubt on Penta is weird. Also Penta didn't slip anywhere during the interactions that I can see so if anything Claire has hindered us more in that regard. She lied about Town or Scum reading Penta to even say she had suspicion to track Penta. Why did she chose Penta who was on her from night phase? Claire was facing down suspicion so what better way to go out than cause a mislynch first?logic340 said: RE1031 said: logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: I think you two are partners bro. If she flips scum you neck is next. I am so done with you this game you been hanging on to logic is scum since....your first post....get out of the tunnel and lets do some work. Maybe logic is just scum after all. That would make today make a lot more sense. It feels like stubborn town logic but his focus on a few untrue points is absurd. Like he's mentioned RE butting in, Claire not giving meta, me not pushing Claire based on activity all like 5 times each... None of those except maybe possibly Claire giving meta mean anything at all but he keeps hammering them. Claire did give meta, it just was she didn't have a strong read on me. RE was being discussed (and he didn't have any issue with CP doing the same at the time with the Day Cop question) so chiming in makes sense. I think Claire has been as active as anyone not named logic. I'm too lazy to manually count posts in this thread but I bet Claire is top 5. And I've said most of this before but it keeps coming back up and I don't get it. So yeah he can blame this on salt too if he likes but I just don't know where logics head is at with this game. Oh and I told you Claire was lying.... can we lynch her now? If she's getting modkilled, then no. If she's getting replaced, maybe. Meanwhile we are back to square one. Which is a huge pain. We may have to read into night actions now - which means more claiming. Modkilled: This would suck but yeah makes sense to move on and see what she flips. Replacement: How the fuck are they going to answer for this? Claire just put major doubt on a more active town read player for no apparent reason. Even said she lied about town reading Penta on D1. If someone replaces I will be lynching there because I don't want to go into D3 or D4 with this question mark. What a fucking pain this is. Like it makes me think that Grapefruit is scum again.... Crossbell said: I don't know anything about overwatch. I do know about Alcatraz where she lied about a PR D2 while facing lynch pressure. She was going to be up against hit here today but this fake claim is so out there I don't see how she feels it helps town or is indicative of "town stepping up"I have absolutely no idea what to make of this situation. My gut thinks that Claire is town because her replace-out post sounded sincere. My brain, however, points to the fact that she falseclaimed to out the investigative power role in the game and to try to lynch Penta. Is this really another Overwatch Mafia, or is Claire just scum? amberwillow said: You do know that Claire has come forward and said she was lying right?PentaFlare said: this makes sense when I read it.So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. _Claire_ said: I can see where it is coming too. I would have expected anyone who was in Penta's position to be a bit more shaken, because if someone says that u visited someone when u don't have any night abilities, u are 100% sure that that person is lying. And Penta here looks a bit emotionally reserved? But he creats/created his case on Claire pretty well. So while I see Claire's point on this, it's not that easy to be sure of how one would behave in certain situations. (I can say so, because CP looked too calm to me and that bothered me, but he fliped town, so yeah).PentaFlare said: _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. Ohh hold on you played with me, uhm.. half a year ago? more? 8 months? 9? I guess my adaption sucks because my playstyle hasnt changed since last year. Alright, so if you have adapted your game and think you can defend yourself by showing a town motivation in the way you have approached the game, you could start with the question I brought up to you about posturing a read on Corrupted. I would write it I am in the train atm, and something going on later so the read may come up late. Oh this is a very strange attitude. If you are TRULY a VT, then you should have said I were lying and such, not trying to prove my point because if you are VT you know that you are right and I am wrong. And you do know that I am talking about Claire's point about Penta's reaction to Claire's statement that she said that she saw him visiting CP, which was before she said that she was lying? I know that she lied about being a tracker, but I still see a possibility of her being town. So, I am sorry, but I don't feel like not paying attention to everything else what she said. What are the chance that they both are mafias? <--this question was pestering me in the same way like which of these two could be. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 8:36 AM
#1221
logic340 said: I didn't say that she is town. I said that I can see a possibility of her being town. (ghnwdskjbvkjd I still dunno what to think about all that besides all the suspicions)amberwillow said: How does all this tell you she may actually be town? Even if she is how do we determine what we can trust from what we can't trust?_Claire_ said: logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: based on yesterday I don't believe that she would have power role and I don't believe we're just throwing it away you're not even questioning it which is very concerning considering your warning at the beginning of the gamelogic340 said: vote:_Claire_ all that talk about town needs to step up now you're leaving it to mechanics and not stepping up. If Penta is truly scum then do something to help me believe this claim. You are awful gung-ho to lynch a claimed PR, I know you're scum reading Claire but it's not like she claimed under huge pressure here. Are you really willing to throw away a town PR because you're so sure of this read? I did bread-crumb I had a PR, but I lied about what kind of PR I am. See, how much you dont read my posts. It saddens me. So u soft claimed somewhere about one role, then claimed a tracker and then claimed VT? Do what we always do. Read peeps posts and see what we think of them. Gotta go now, cya |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 8:40 AM
#1222
_Claire_ said: That's a shame if u are actually quitting, Clairy. But well, whichever u flip, I am gonna to look into your posts and especially your interactions with others anyway.@amberwillow I have told the host I am quitting the game so dont waste your breathe. If anything, people will pin you as scum for trying to understand me. While u have time u could explain yourself as much as u can while u have time. Anw I srsly gotta run >.< |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 8:55 AM
#1223
amberwillow said: The thing is Claire was lying so we really don't have a dichotomy like we thought and thinking that Penta is scum based of what Claire did just doesn't hold up any longer. If you were scum reading or neutral leaning scum before this all hapeened then ok but I am not sure where you were on them before which is why I asked. Did the same thing with Sollux before he started reading. I want to know before and after so I can compare the views. Now that i's out that Claire lied that information becomes even more valuable if you ask me. Grapefruit trying to stifle conversation on the assumption that Claire was being honest is just wrong imo and we need to figure this out without mechanics and let that be the cherry on top. logic340 said: Indeed.amberwillow said: logic340 said: Yes, I saw that.RE1031 said: logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: I think you two are partners bro. If she flips scum you neck is next. I am so done with you this game you been hanging on to logic is scum since....your first post....get out of the tunnel and lets do some work. Maybe logic is just scum after all. That would make today make a lot more sense. It feels like stubborn town logic but his focus on a few untrue points is absurd. Like he's mentioned RE butting in, Claire not giving meta, me not pushing Claire based on activity all like 5 times each... None of those except maybe possibly Claire giving meta mean anything at all but he keeps hammering them. Claire did give meta, it just was she didn't have a strong read on me. RE was being discussed (and he didn't have any issue with CP doing the same at the time with the Day Cop question) so chiming in makes sense. I think Claire has been as active as anyone not named logic. I'm too lazy to manually count posts in this thread but I bet Claire is top 5. And I've said most of this before but it keeps coming back up and I don't get it. So yeah he can blame this on salt too if he likes but I just don't know where logics head is at with this game. Oh and I told you Claire was lying.... can we lynch her now? If she's getting modkilled, then no. If she's getting replaced, maybe. Meanwhile we are back to square one. Which is a huge pain. We may have to read into night actions now - which means more claiming. Modkilled: This would suck but yeah makes sense to move on and see what she flips. Replacement: How the fuck are they going to answer for this? Claire just put major doubt on a more active town read player for no apparent reason. Even said she lied about town reading Penta on D1. If someone replaces I will be lynching there because I don't want to go into D3 or D4 with this question mark. What a fucking pain this is. Like it makes me think that Grapefruit is scum again.... Crossbell said: I don't know anything about overwatch. I do know about Alcatraz where she lied about a PR D2 while facing lynch pressure. She was going to be up against hit here today but this fake claim is so out there I don't see how she feels it helps town or is indicative of "town stepping up"I have absolutely no idea what to make of this situation. My gut thinks that Claire is town because her replace-out post sounded sincere. My brain, however, points to the fact that she falseclaimed to out the investigative power role in the game and to try to lynch Penta. Is this really another Overwatch Mafia, or is Claire just scum? amberwillow said: You do know that Claire has come forward and said she was lying right?PentaFlare said: this makes sense when I read it.So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. _Claire_ said: I can see where it is coming too. I would have expected anyone who was in Penta's position to be a bit more shaken, because if someone says that u visited someone when u don't have any night abilities, u are 100% sure that that person is lying. And Penta here looks a bit emotionally reserved? But he creats/created his case on Claire pretty well. So while I see Claire's point on this, it's not that easy to be sure of how one would behave in certain situations. (I can say so, because CP looked too calm to me and that bothered me, but he fliped town, so yeah).PentaFlare said: _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: So, Claire has just triggered one of her major scumtells in a game. When she is scum and is heavily suspected, especially early on, she will not try to defend herself by interacting with the players who suspect her and trying to change her mind. Town Claire will do this, usually getting very emotional in the process. However, mafia Claire will either just try and pull an emotion defense ("there is nothing I can defend myself with when it is only day 1. What could you expect me to do?" kind of thing) which is how I got her as scum in Shounen Crossover, or she will switch the argument to be about mechanics instead of mindset and past actions. This is definitely Claire's scum game. Ohh hold on you played with me, uhm.. half a year ago? more? 8 months? 9? I guess my adaption sucks because my playstyle hasnt changed since last year. Alright, so if you have adapted your game and think you can defend yourself by showing a town motivation in the way you have approached the game, you could start with the question I brought up to you about posturing a read on Corrupted. I would write it I am in the train atm, and something going on later so the read may come up late. Oh this is a very strange attitude. If you are TRULY a VT, then you should have said I were lying and such, not trying to prove my point because if you are VT you know that you are right and I am wrong. And you do know that I am talking about Claire's point about Penta's reaction to Claire's statement that she said that she saw him visiting CP, which was before she said that she was lying? I know that she lied about being a tracker, but I still see a possibility of her being town. So, I am sorry, but I don't feel like not paying attention to everything else what she said. What are the chance that they both are mafias? <--this question was pestering me in the same way like which of these two could be. Claire's D1 behavior felt scummy to the point I didn't even believe her claim. Now I find out it's a lie how am I supposed to vote Penta with that? |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 9:03 AM
#1224
_Claire_ said: Claire it's not that I don't read your posts. It's that you lie about so much that I don't know what to believe. You lied when you bread-crumbed, you lied about being a tracker, you lied about your results in an attempt to get PentaFlare lynched, you say you lied about town reading Penta but how do we know that? How am I supposed to believe anything you say with all these lies?logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: logic340 said: vote:_Claire_ all that talk about town needs to step up now you're leaving it to mechanics and not stepping up. If Penta is truly scum then do something to help me believe this claim. You are awful gung-ho to lynch a claimed PR, I know you're scum reading Claire but it's not like she claimed under huge pressure here. Are you really willing to throw away a town PR because you're so sure of this read? I did bread-crumb I had a PR, but I lied about what kind of PR I am. See, how much you dont read my posts. It saddens me. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 9:12 AM
#1225
Crossbell said: Can we just lynch Claire and move on? Like I don't see how a replacement can fix the damage she has done. @Grapefruit21 @PentaFlare What are your thoughts on the situation? I am completely lost right now, and not sure what to make of Claire falseclaiming. @Grapefruti21 This is exactly what I was talking about. Rather than actually play the game with us she made up some BS about Penta being scum? Went as far as to say she lied about her Penta read on D1 (how does that help town) and further perpetuated the lie. I tried to talk with you about it last night but you are too stuck on the right way to do things that you ignore when Claire is doing things the wrong way. If you are town then come on man get it together here if not then you can be next to take the rope. Go back look how Claire claimed and tell me again why you believed it? I swear all that talk about town need to step their game up and she is goes and pulls this shit after the D1 she had.....like I am pissed right now. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 9:24 AM
#1226
| This is taking forever to put together and it's so quiet around here. Who else wants to weigh in on the current situation. Scum team is hiding are you not wanting to take a side? Scum out, scum out, where ever you are??? |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 10:03 AM
#1227
logic340 said: This is taking forever to put together and it's so quiet around here. Who else wants to weigh in on the current situation. Scum team is hiding are you not wanting to take a side? Scum out, scum out, where ever you are??? Here I am. This is all very interesting : D . I quickly run through the pages and I haven't read it all but I have positive feelings for today. I have few more hours work and I will catch up after that. For now vote: logic (sadly though I am pretty sure i will have to change this after I back read) . |
Mar 24, 2017 10:06 AM
#1229
Mar 24, 2017 10:09 AM
#1230
_Claire_ said: @amberwillow I have told the host I am quitting the game so dont waste your breathe. If anything, people will pin you as scum for trying to understand me. Yey no more @claire ^^ ! |
Mar 24, 2017 10:10 AM
#1231
Mar 24, 2017 10:17 AM
#1232
grrr said: Maybe once you catch up you will see that there really isn't much work for me to do there actually:Can we just lynch Claire and move on? Like I don't see how a replacement can fix the damage she has done. You will need to do a lot of explanation for this one I am pretty sure. See you in 3 hours. Long and short of it: Claire was getting heat from me and Penta to start the phase. Came out tried to defend herself and when that failed she claimed to see Penta visit CP last night. When that didn't work she admitted to being VT and asked to be Modkilled since no one else would be able to salvage her slot. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 10:36 AM
#1233
logic340 said: Claire was getting heat from me and Penta to start the phase. Came out tried to defend herself and when that failed she claimed to see Penta visit CP last night. When that didn't work she admitted to being VT and asked to be Modkilled since no one else would be able to salvage her slot. I don't believe you. Claire is not crying kid like that. That sounds more like karote. |
Mar 24, 2017 10:47 AM
#1234
grrr said: Read the thread then tell me what conclusion you come to. This is how I see it though. The timing and everything is just way off not like the last time when she lied about a PR as town.logic340 said: Claire was getting heat from me and Penta to start the phase. Came out tried to defend herself and when that failed she claimed to see Penta visit CP last night. When that didn't work she admitted to being VT and asked to be Modkilled since no one else would be able to salvage her slot. I don't believe you. Claire is not crying kid like that. That sounds more like karote. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 10:53 AM
#1235
PentaFlare said: Now that we know the truth will you go back and look at it from the other side? Grapefruit was the one attacking Purity yesterday not the other way around. As I re-read the thread and put together this Purity interactions post you are not looking as good as you did during your argument with Claire.CorruptedPurity said: PentaFlare said: CorruptedPurity said: PentaFlare said: Well, since I didn't get anything out of that attempt to not comment on any of the main wagons, time to do a dump from my notes. Please don't just skip over this because it is a wall or just nod along and move on. I want to know what others think about what I'm bringing up. My thoughts regarding CorruptedPurity: Corrupted is probably mafia. Their actions so far this phase give the impression of a mafia player trying to appear like a productive townie instead of genuine scumhunting. The first post which seems scummy is #51 where they comment on Grapefruit's ultimatum. Paraphrased, the post is "This is a good point, but this isn't normal grapefruit". This emphasis is placed on the second half, being that this isn't normal grapefruit. This kind of post does two things: creates doubt about grapefruit and suggests a scumlean based on meta. However, the post includes only facts and skips the throught process. There isn't a "this is unusual for grape and since I've only seen them as town this different behavious makes me think they are a different alignment". That would be a scumlean, however small (considering this is only the top of the second page). Instead, therefore, the scumlean is not the main intent of this post, so it must be the doubt. Creating doubt about other players so early is scummy because town only cast doubt on decently developed scumreads. In #110, Corrupted talks about the grapefruit post again and makes it even more clear that the goal is not the scumlean because they suggest both a mafia motive behind the change and a town motive behind the change. Possibility of either = doubt. A little further down in #117 they answer my day cop question addressed to Crossbell. They obviously know I'm asking a hypothetical question because they list me as one of the options. Therefore, I can only see one reason for answering the question. They are seizing the opportunity to contribute to just about anything because contribution seems townlike. It is true that town can also try to look like town because getting lynched as town is bad but this is much more often a mafia action because mafia can't rely on genuine towniness. However, the extra thing that tips it further into being a mafia motivated action is that another town member would also be interested in how Cross would respond. Discussing the topic before Cross can answer would likely make Cross's answer less important because of the amount that's been discussed already. (luckily Cross reads and answers in order). It is likely that Corrupted simply wasn't interested in finding out Cross's alignment which a town member wouldn't be. These two things combined make answering the question more mafia-like than townie. #150 also explicitly states there is no scumread on grapefruit. The shade being cast is just for the sake of casting shade. It is true that #155 is expressing a town mindset. Taking a close look at voters who build large trains is important. However, this isn't a very strong townlean. The three scumleans mentioned so far are adding up to a stronger swing that way. I'm not going to cite much of the discussion of cop checks and order of priority. It is nice that they are expressing suspicions, but overall I find it non-alignment indicative. The only other posts are trying to pry information out of me but that is also non-alignment indicative because I was being so antitown that I was a super easy target to pressure no matter what the alignment of the person doing the pressuring was. That's all for now folks! Ok. Thanks for giving me something to play with. Let's break this down. Regarding post #51. Maybe that post is supposed to do something outside the two you suggested, maybe the purpose of my post is to pressure Grapefruit (which is working, he is responding to it). As I said, I don't like voting without substantial evidence. From my POV, I had reasons to suspect Grapfruit but it isn't enough, I need him to post more for me to get more reads off of him and more evidence off of him. Scumlean is not my main intent of that post, it is to set up for future scum leans depending on how Grape responded. Maybe I did create doubt in some other's but it is merely an unintended side effect of me pushing into Grape. #110. I push onto him because I want to determine if he was scum. Based on his responses, I cannot 100% nail him down as scum and thus need to keep my views open. Or would you rather me tunnel on him to be scum? #117. This is an interesting one. I thought you were asking hypothetical cop and although I wasn't Cross, I was dying to talk to someone, anyone, about anything. You posed an interesting question and thus I decided to stick my nose into it (maybe I was wrong to do so but I was so bored, I'm sorry). Things got slightly out of hand when I mistaken day cop for normal cop and got others involved, not necessarily a bad thing because that is more information we can look back on in the future. Now, the second part. I don't know if you're overvaluing getting information from Cross or I'm undervaluing it. Cross has done nothing to raise any scum alerts in me so no I wasn't interested in finding out much about him at the time, maybe in the future but as of that moment, no. I thought that my answer would've stopped there instead of going rampant with the rest so I honestly did not expect my involvement to hinder your read on Cross, and I must apologize for that. What I didn't like was your lack of involvement in the discussion you started. But that's not the point, I'll save my suspicions of you for a different post. I really think you're overvaluing Cross and blaming me for ruining your read, cos I don't see a scum in myself in that play. #150 Starting to sound like a broken recorder here but I as I said, I'm not throwing shade to cast doubt or shit. I want to pressure him, I don't want to lynch him yet as I need more evidence of him being scum to give myself the conviction to place the Grape vote. "The only other posts are trying to pry information out of me but that is also non-alignment indicative because I was being so antitown that I was a super easy target to pressure no matter what the alignment of the person doing the pressuring was." You seem to know your own predicament. Is this intentional or not? Why would you want to appear anti-town? I can't see #51 as pressure because it isn't. To be pressuring someone, you need to be trying to elicit a change from them. Your post was commenting on grape's meta. It is related to how they've decided to play this game. Just saying "Hey, you are playing differently" isn't going to change how they play. Why wouldn't you be interested in learning about Cross? Even if you don't scumread Cross, you should still be trying to sort all players one way or another. The only reason to not be interest is if you already know. The way you are saying that you don't have the evidence to place a vote yet is incredibly scummy. You don't believe grape is vote-worthy yet, so you are just going to push them until you can find anything to support a vote. You've already decided what your read is going to be and are just finding ways to support it. Yes my anti-town behaviour was intentional, try rereading my exchange with grape before my wall post. 1)Dunno how you define pressure, but I believed that I've (successfully) pressured grape. When I say pressure, I mean applying pressure to which will cause them to react, and from the reaction I can analyse to gain more information on whether my read is right or not. I don't want to change the way they play, I want to understand the way they play and whether it is pro-town or anti-town. 2)I wouldn't be interested in learning about cross yet. He'd post enough by the time I want to get a read on him, priority for me was getting as much information as possible. And arguably, we got more information from followind and amberwillow and rosie reacting to the question than cross. As I said, I never intended to hinder your attempt to read cross. But you can always do that at another time. 3)You prefer for me to just vote Grape without hearing out everything first? And yes, I'm going to push him until I find something to support my vote. If I can't find anything to support my vote, then that would clear Grape for me. Also, I don't know really understand your anti-town playstyle but if you're really sure you know what you're doing, I'll leave you be for now... My problem is that you are approaching the attack on grapefruit as showing why they are scum and not determining if they are scum. That's what I've caught from your posts. Also,my current behaviour is not antitown. That was just the gambit I was doing with grapefruit earlier. If you think I am being antitown, can you show why instead of just discrediting me by continuing to throw the word antitown around when it no longer applies to what I am doing? |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 11:05 AM
#1236
logic340 said: PentaFlare said: If Grapefruit is Claire's teammate do you see him taking this strong a stance against you?_Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: _Claire_ said: PentaFlare said: Grapefruit21 said: @logic340 I never thought Claire was scum. Playing a strange/suspect game, but not her scum game. I wouldn't call the post you quoted in 1025 diverting at all. It's not changing the subject to another issue. Yes, it's involving other players but Claire is still on subject. I'm really surprised that I'm being told not to rely on mechanics here, these are the exact sort of dichotmy's that make the game easier. If you can find much better proof that Claire is scum that the ramblings you have now I'll vote Claire because one of these two dies today. But for the time being I'm not going to lynch the claimed investigative. @PentaFlare I am looking at the chances of each player being scum and I maintain strongly that logic was onto something with Claire carrying over resentment from last game (I had emotions carry over too, but channeled it in other directions such as trying to make sure we had EoD wagons). That said what does Claire stand to gain from carrying it over as scum? Town Claire would be likely to tunnel in and focus on the people who beat her the previous game if they give her the slightest excuse. I don't see the scum motivation for doing so. TLDR: I don't think Claire is scum because I am seeing the same emotional play logic has been harping on and think it comes from town. Town Claire does not stand to gain from posturing a scum read like in the post I brought up. Even if she might be a little emotional from a previous game, that wouldn't lead her to tunnel through to another game, focusing on a single player. Scum does stand to game from posturing a scumread because it allows them to vote an innocent townie with less reasoning. It is a psychological thing. Mafia posture scumreads because then a vote with less reasoning feels more like a "I've been building up to this" thing than a "I have weak reasoning" thing. Take a look at her rapid vote changes between Purity and grrr. Do you see a town motivation in how fast her read on grrr slingshots and how that somehow makes Purity, who we know was town, to be super scummy in her eyes? Meta-reading me wont work, because you last saw my game more than half a year ago. But as you please. Question to you @logic340 you see my scum-game right? Do I strike you as a careless mafia? Do you think I will just change my vote left/right? Do you think I will claim like this as town? please answer with neutral mindset. JUST think, would I do it? If you still think I am, I guess I am wasting my breath trying to convince you because whatever I say wont register anymore since you want me to be scum, not you try to see my alignment. You are just trying to discredit me here. The same scum tells that applied to me in some of my first games still apply to me now. I've just learned my own so I know to focus on avoiding them. Specific tells on players don't just dissapear, they can only learn to avoid them. That's an adaptation of one's play. You haven't learned to avoid this tell because this is the first time it has every been explicitly stated to you. I only learned to avoid my tells after being lynched many times for them. The passage of time can't erase a tell, because scummy things are still scummy. Hah, so you are not discrediting how I play? I am not discrediting, I am just saying the plain truth but because you are scum you want to manipulate how people think about this. I can see this isnt going anywhere, and you want a mislynch before my flip hands you your head to town and I have seen this before to know it. I have explained myself, and I will let the town see the truth. What I'm saying is that instead of arguing my points and presenting counterarguments, you are just brushing them off and saying they can't be applied in this situation. You aren't having a logical debate with me, just discrediting me. I am certainly trying to discredit you, but I am trying to discredit your towniness through my arguments, not the kind of discrediting you are doing. "discredit my towniness" hmm.. But you thought I were scum, no? So there must not be any towiness. Also I am not discrediting I keep on telling you how your "this is occasionally done by town, but also scum" but you only see the scum side and refuse to see my POV if I am town. That shows that you arent gonna listen to me anymore. No kidding I'm not going to see it from a possible town perspective on your part because you aren't town. I'm still going to point out if something could be townie though because I'm not trying to build a false narrative to show why you are scum, I'm trying to build a truthful narrative that shows why you were scum. That involves not misrepresenting actions. Also, you're omitting a key word. Occasionally by town, often by scum. It happen more often by scum which is why I felt it was valid to mention in these circumstances. You are also omitting the fact I could be town, and thats why your opinion of me here is not relevant anymore to me. Regardless of what I say/you say, I am scum to you and you sre scum to me. So I am not going to argue about this anymore to you but I want the others' opinions. I am more interested in what others have to say. Well, actually, you are scum to me and I am town to you, but obviously you are not going to say that. The thing is though, you can say you don't want to discuss it with me as much as you want, but everytime you confuse my wording to make it less clear, I'm going to correct and clarify that, so don't expect me to stop responding. Yeah. Possibly. I think that their approach to this situation would be a very smart one for town. Defending Claire by focusing on mechanics and roles principally. This doesn't make me any more suspicious of grape because this is also something many townies would do, I just wish they would consider their reads more when making the decision, in no small part because I want to live to see another phase in case the PR suddenly gets busy and can't claim or is someone like grrr who just might not claim. |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
Mar 24, 2017 11:08 AM
#1237
_Claire_ said: @Kit I am very deeply sorry but I dont think I am in emotional state where I can play this game. Would kindly ask to be mod-killed please, as I dont see how someone replacing me will be able to play this game comfortably. Sorry for the drama. I am not a PR, I am VT. I also dont expect anyone to believe me. I dont want the investigative role to be out, so I am saying this now. I dont want the game to turn into worse when the investigative was out, I just want reaction from people, but I dont expect things like this to happen. So yes. Goodluck. Oh. I should probably catch up completely before I continuing to respond to posts |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
Mar 24, 2017 11:14 AM
#1238
Mar 24, 2017 11:15 AM
#1239
| I'm back |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 11:17 AM
#1240
| huh. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 11:22 AM
#1241
| Shit done got real crazy around here. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 24, 2017 11:42 AM
#1242
logic340 said: Alright then.amberwillow said: No I haven't done it yet but now that she might get modkilled I don't know if I should take the time doing it? RIght now I am working on CP interactions by users so there will be a mini one for Claire since the majority of her D1 revolved around Purity. logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: hm....I'm here, listening and thinking. Don't have much to say I guess I'll start working this Claire iso then... Will you talk to me about Grapefruit and your opinion on him? @Crossbell same question as above please? Anything specific? Hmm.. Grape tends to make some susp looking posts that doesn't add to his image but most of the time he looks like a townie. What I saw recently (while scroling through posts that I didn't read all yet )was him taking Claire's side when she claimed to be a tracker and I can understand him pretty well on this. I believe that that was a town reaction, but with her admiting that a claim was fake I am not sure. If Claire would flip mafia then I would mark him with a bigger question mark, especially cuz he might have saved her from being lynched. I have to say that he behaved townish at this point (D2) and he felt like a townie after that Penta's text wall about CP being baddie. The part between CP/Grape was confusing and both of them looked quite bad to me. And dunno if it's important but what stuck to my mind how he looked like he freaked out about Penta checking him with his "day cop" power. ^ that's my "before reading" thoughts about him. I will see if anything changes after I finish reading. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 11:49 AM
#1243
logic340 said: Ohh rightt, CP started it but then Grape was defending himself while attacking. Yeee, he could have been looking townish cuz of the contrast with CP being painted bad. I really need to review that part.PentaFlare said: Now that we know the truth will you go back and look at it from the other side? Grapefruit was the one attacking Purity yesterday not the other way around. As I re-read the thread and put together this Purity interactions post you are not looking as good as you did during your argument with Claire.CorruptedPurity said: PentaFlare said: CorruptedPurity said: PentaFlare said: Well, since I didn't get anything out of that attempt to not comment on any of the main wagons, time to do a dump from my notes. Please don't just skip over this because it is a wall or just nod along and move on. I want to know what others think about what I'm bringing up. My thoughts regarding CorruptedPurity: Corrupted is probably mafia. Their actions so far this phase give the impression of a mafia player trying to appear like a productive townie instead of genuine scumhunting. The first post which seems scummy is #51 where they comment on Grapefruit's ultimatum. Paraphrased, the post is "This is a good point, but this isn't normal grapefruit". This emphasis is placed on the second half, being that this isn't normal grapefruit. This kind of post does two things: creates doubt about grapefruit and suggests a scumlean based on meta. However, the post includes only facts and skips the throught process. There isn't a "this is unusual for grape and since I've only seen them as town this different behavious makes me think they are a different alignment". That would be a scumlean, however small (considering this is only the top of the second page). Instead, therefore, the scumlean is not the main intent of this post, so it must be the doubt. Creating doubt about other players so early is scummy because town only cast doubt on decently developed scumreads. In #110, Corrupted talks about the grapefruit post again and makes it even more clear that the goal is not the scumlean because they suggest both a mafia motive behind the change and a town motive behind the change. Possibility of either = doubt. A little further down in #117 they answer my day cop question addressed to Crossbell. They obviously know I'm asking a hypothetical question because they list me as one of the options. Therefore, I can only see one reason for answering the question. They are seizing the opportunity to contribute to just about anything because contribution seems townlike. It is true that town can also try to look like town because getting lynched as town is bad but this is much more often a mafia action because mafia can't rely on genuine towniness. However, the extra thing that tips it further into being a mafia motivated action is that another town member would also be interested in how Cross would respond. Discussing the topic before Cross can answer would likely make Cross's answer less important because of the amount that's been discussed already. (luckily Cross reads and answers in order). It is likely that Corrupted simply wasn't interested in finding out Cross's alignment which a town member wouldn't be. These two things combined make answering the question more mafia-like than townie. #150 also explicitly states there is no scumread on grapefruit. The shade being cast is just for the sake of casting shade. It is true that #155 is expressing a town mindset. Taking a close look at voters who build large trains is important. However, this isn't a very strong townlean. The three scumleans mentioned so far are adding up to a stronger swing that way. I'm not going to cite much of the discussion of cop checks and order of priority. It is nice that they are expressing suspicions, but overall I find it non-alignment indicative. The only other posts are trying to pry information out of me but that is also non-alignment indicative because I was being so antitown that I was a super easy target to pressure no matter what the alignment of the person doing the pressuring was. That's all for now folks! Ok. Thanks for giving me something to play with. Let's break this down. Regarding post #51. Maybe that post is supposed to do something outside the two you suggested, maybe the purpose of my post is to pressure Grapefruit (which is working, he is responding to it). As I said, I don't like voting without substantial evidence. From my POV, I had reasons to suspect Grapfruit but it isn't enough, I need him to post more for me to get more reads off of him and more evidence off of him. Scumlean is not my main intent of that post, it is to set up for future scum leans depending on how Grape responded. Maybe I did create doubt in some other's but it is merely an unintended side effect of me pushing into Grape. #110. I push onto him because I want to determine if he was scum. Based on his responses, I cannot 100% nail him down as scum and thus need to keep my views open. Or would you rather me tunnel on him to be scum? #117. This is an interesting one. I thought you were asking hypothetical cop and although I wasn't Cross, I was dying to talk to someone, anyone, about anything. You posed an interesting question and thus I decided to stick my nose into it (maybe I was wrong to do so but I was so bored, I'm sorry). Things got slightly out of hand when I mistaken day cop for normal cop and got others involved, not necessarily a bad thing because that is more information we can look back on in the future. Now, the second part. I don't know if you're overvaluing getting information from Cross or I'm undervaluing it. Cross has done nothing to raise any scum alerts in me so no I wasn't interested in finding out much about him at the time, maybe in the future but as of that moment, no. I thought that my answer would've stopped there instead of going rampant with the rest so I honestly did not expect my involvement to hinder your read on Cross, and I must apologize for that. What I didn't like was your lack of involvement in the discussion you started. But that's not the point, I'll save my suspicions of you for a different post. I really think you're overvaluing Cross and blaming me for ruining your read, cos I don't see a scum in myself in that play. #150 Starting to sound like a broken recorder here but I as I said, I'm not throwing shade to cast doubt or shit. I want to pressure him, I don't want to lynch him yet as I need more evidence of him being scum to give myself the conviction to place the Grape vote. "The only other posts are trying to pry information out of me but that is also non-alignment indicative because I was being so antitown that I was a super easy target to pressure no matter what the alignment of the person doing the pressuring was." You seem to know your own predicament. Is this intentional or not? Why would you want to appear anti-town? I can't see #51 as pressure because it isn't. To be pressuring someone, you need to be trying to elicit a change from them. Your post was commenting on grape's meta. It is related to how they've decided to play this game. Just saying "Hey, you are playing differently" isn't going to change how they play. Why wouldn't you be interested in learning about Cross? Even if you don't scumread Cross, you should still be trying to sort all players one way or another. The only reason to not be interest is if you already know. The way you are saying that you don't have the evidence to place a vote yet is incredibly scummy. You don't believe grape is vote-worthy yet, so you are just going to push them until you can find anything to support a vote. You've already decided what your read is going to be and are just finding ways to support it. Yes my anti-town behaviour was intentional, try rereading my exchange with grape before my wall post. 1)Dunno how you define pressure, but I believed that I've (successfully) pressured grape. When I say pressure, I mean applying pressure to which will cause them to react, and from the reaction I can analyse to gain more information on whether my read is right or not. I don't want to change the way they play, I want to understand the way they play and whether it is pro-town or anti-town. 2)I wouldn't be interested in learning about cross yet. He'd post enough by the time I want to get a read on him, priority for me was getting as much information as possible. And arguably, we got more information from followind and amberwillow and rosie reacting to the question than cross. As I said, I never intended to hinder your attempt to read cross. But you can always do that at another time. 3)You prefer for me to just vote Grape without hearing out everything first? And yes, I'm going to push him until I find something to support my vote. If I can't find anything to support my vote, then that would clear Grape for me. Also, I don't know really understand your anti-town playstyle but if you're really sure you know what you're doing, I'll leave you be for now... My problem is that you are approaching the attack on grapefruit as showing why they are scum and not determining if they are scum. That's what I've caught from your posts. Also,my current behaviour is not antitown. That was just the gambit I was doing with grapefruit earlier. If you think I am being antitown, can you show why instead of just discrediting me by continuing to throw the word antitown around when it no longer applies to what I am doing? |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 11:51 AM
#1244
| Alright, so. Here are my thoughts. Out of Penta and Claire, Claire definitely seems to be more of a mafia member in my eyes. Their actions seem to be a little too off. But since they are quitting, so I'm not going to place my vote there. Quick question, is it possible to have a Jester in this game? |
Mar 24, 2017 11:56 AM
#1245
Sollux16 said: Alright, so. Here are my thoughts. Out of Penta and Claire, Claire definitely seems to be more of a mafia member in my eyes. Their actions seem to be a little too off. But since they are quitting, so I'm not going to place my vote there. Quick question, is it possible to have a Jester in this game? I'm pretty sure there are no third parties in this game. |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
Mar 24, 2017 11:57 AM
#1246
| So, I'm kind of at a loss for words. To describe what I'm thinking right now. I'm going to take time to process this and come back to it later |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
Mar 24, 2017 12:02 PM
#1247
PentaFlare said: Sollux16 said: Alright, so. Here are my thoughts. Out of Penta and Claire, Claire definitely seems to be more of a mafia member in my eyes. Their actions seem to be a little too off. But since they are quitting, so I'm not going to place my vote there. Quick question, is it possible to have a Jester in this game? I'm pretty sure there are no third parties in this game. Ok, I was gonna say that if there is, then Grrr has to be it. Since there isn't I'm going to Vote: Grrr everytime they vote, they don't really give a reason. They voted logic D1 and when asked for a reason, didn't say anything. I'm willing to over look that one for the simple fact it was more than likely a RVS, BUT later when they voted Rosie they were pushing people to vote claire while not voting for claire themselves. And when I asked for their reason, they still wouldn't explain. Now they have their vote on Logic again and still haven't really explained. @Grrr can you please explain your vote on Logic? Why do you think he is scum? Also, why are you so sure that you will have to change your vote? Are you voting for him but not really having a scum read on him? |
Mar 24, 2017 12:04 PM
#1248
logic340 said: I doubt that there would be a vengeful in a basic mafia o.OGrapefruit21 said: that's only the case of Claire isn't a vengeful which is much worse for us. Please don't ignore that possibility. Also what has Claire fine to have earner trust here?PentaFlare said: You aren't cleared on your "facts" Claire. If there was no information about us other than the fact that we both made these claims, it would be 50/50 to guess who is yelling the truth. However, because there is more information, a careful analysis can be done and the odds will different. I intend to show that the likelihood of you being town is very unlikely. Here's the thing though: 1 one you is dying this phase 100% with this dictohmy. And we can afford it to be you first because you haven't claimed a PR. The only way we lynch Claire first here is if she is caught in a provable lie. And that isn't the case right now. Vote: PentaFlare If you're town sorry and we'll lynch Claire tomorrow and get a 1 for 1 which is pretty great. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 12:11 PM
#1249
| @Sollux16 since u are here, I wanna ask if u have caught up with thread and what do you think about Grape and Followind? Are there any other people u find susp who look susp besides grr and Claire? Was there anything that caught your eye while u were reading the thread? |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 24, 2017 12:15 PM
#1250
| I don't think it's Penta vs. Claire anymore. Penta was just a victim of Claire's fake claim. Still think there's a possibility Penta and Claire are a team and Claire's actions could be to make Penta look innocent for late game, but for that to happen Claire would have to be mafia and I'd rather lynch her still. Ignoring the emotional friction between Claire and Logic earlier, and just looking at the fake claim -> VT claim, this is not townie material. I don't know why anyone would be prompted to do this if they truly want to help town. Especially given her attitude before and during this - she was criticizing us for being manipulated by scum and basically our inability to make sense of it - then she makes a fake claim which undoubtedly was going to throw off everyone. Scum or not, it's completely unjustified to be blaming others for mislynches and confusion when you're the main contributor. It seems possible that by taking back the PR claim and defaulting to VT, she's setting her replacer (if she were to get one because asking for modkill does not mean you'll get one) up in a better position. If no one wants to come out and discuss night actions, fine, so be it. I will vote Claire (or the replacement) by the end of this stage, unless there is even more extremely damning evidence. |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » [Club] Member Introductions ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Bombolz - Jul 6, 2014 |
574 |
by Serafos
»»
Yesterday, 12:49 AM |
|
» [GAME] Solve the Riddle ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Zymf - Aug 6, 2015 |
975 |
by Serafos
»»
Jan 2, 9:46 PM |
|
» [GAME] Make a Mafia Alias for the User Above YouMaiTai - Dec 9, 2014 |
42 |
by Serafos
»»
Dec 27, 2025 11:32 PM |
|
» [GAME] Banana Gameosieorb18 - Jan 10, 2019 |
15 |
by Serafos
»»
Dec 27, 2025 11:32 PM |
|
» [GAME] Potato Game ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Shinichi-Kun - Sep 23, 2015 |
2928 |
by Serafos
»»
Dec 27, 2025 11:31 PM |