Forum Settings
Forums

So do you guys really obsess over lolis and highschool girls or is it just an act?

New
Pages (4) « First ... « 2 3 [4]
Dec 3, 2014 7:06 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
Eearu said:
the age of consent in brazil (if that's where you live (as your avatar implies)) is actually 14, just some minor thing to point out.


Just to make things clear, I'm not against teenagers having sex lol (this isn't ''messing around for me'', just some pretty normal stuff to do). Probably Immahnoob thinks I'm also talking about sex, I'm not.
Dec 3, 2014 7:07 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
Immahnoob said:
Kolnikov said:
>Law is not inherently right

Who said it is? =D

"The rule that says is already enough is called law"


Where is the ''right'' in this statement? A rule can be unfair and wrong. In fact, I think a lot of them are wrong from a particular point of view. Either way, considering some other circumstances I don't discard them right away.
Dec 3, 2014 7:09 PM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
Kolnikov said:
Eearu said:
the age of consent in brazil (if that's where you live (as your avatar implies)) is actually 14, just some minor thing to point out.


Just to make things clear, I'm not against teenagers having sex lol (this isn't ''messing around for me'', just some pretty normal stuff to do). Probably Immahnoob thinks I'm also talking about sex, I'm not.
We could add all the others too. What else is there? Alcohol? Driving? Smoking?
Kolnikov said:
Where is the ''right'' in this statement? A rule can be unfair and wrong. In fact, I think a lot of them are wrong from a particular point of view. Either way, considering some other circumstances I don't discard them right away.
I'll ask you a relevant question now. Do you know the meaning of words? Words have meaning behind them. You basically said "The law says so, so it's enough." and if that statement is true, that means that law would be inherently right.

You're contradicting yourself now. I want to know why law was "right" in that case, but if you do agree that teenagers shouldn't be barred from sex, I don't really care.
ImmahnoobDec 3, 2014 7:13 PM




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 3, 2014 7:12 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
Immahnoob said:
Kolnikov said:


Just to make things clear, I'm not against teenagers having sex lol (this isn't ''messing around for me'', just some pretty normal stuff to do). Probably Immahnoob thinks I'm also talking about sex, I'm not.
We could add all the others too. What else is there? Alcohol? Driving? Smoking?


In Brasil the age is 18, for military service you have to subscribe with 17. You can vote with 16. Normal work is 18, but you can work part-time with 14. For sex is 14. Overall, I consider the age of consent as 18... But what exactly is ''age of consent'', can you give me the definition?
Dec 3, 2014 7:16 PM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
Age of consent is the age when you are able to say "Yes" to sexual acts. Otherwise, anyone that wants to have sex with you before the age of consent is "raping you" because if you lack the ability to consent, that means it will always be "No" and you yourself as one that hasn't reached the age of consent can't change it to "Yes" anyway.

Smoking and alcohol can be harmful on the long run. Driving can be quite difficult as it's both practice and theory, it also involves a lot of fast decision taking.




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 3, 2014 7:16 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
Immahnoob said:
Kolnikov said:


Just to make things clear, I'm not against teenagers having sex lol (this isn't ''messing around for me'', just some pretty normal stuff to do). Probably Immahnoob thinks I'm also talking about sex, I'm not.
We could add all the others too. What else is there? Alcohol? Driving? Smoking?
Kolnikov said:
Where is the ''right'' in this statement? A rule can be unfair and wrong. In fact, I think a lot of them are wrong from a particular point of view. Either way, considering some other circumstances I don't discard them right away.
I'll ask you a relevant question now. Do you know the meaning of words? Words have meaning behind them. You basically said "The law says so, so it's enough." and if that statement is true, that means that law would be inherently right.

You're contradicting yourself now. I want to know why law was "right" in that case, but if you do agree that teenagers shouldn't be barred from sex, I don't really care.


No, I didn't say the law was right. I just said it was convenient. For your last question, I don't care if teenagers have sex, don't think is wrong lol. I'm more worried about driving and alcohol.
Dec 3, 2014 7:20 PM

Offline
Mar 2008
53426
Kolnikov the "age of consent" or "consent age" is the age you are legally allowed to consent to sex. Consent is an invited approval. Its meaning only applies to sex, not the drinking, smoking, driving, voting ages.
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
Dec 3, 2014 7:20 PM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
The thing is, about smoking and alcohol, although they are harmful, why do adults have the right to take that decision of harming themselves?

The idea that a teenager has no idea about the consequences, about the act etc is just pure propaganda.

Also, if we'd let teenagers get a license earlier, it wouldn't change that they have to take the same test. If they're not able to finish the test, then they're not able to have a license, therefore they cannot drive.
traed said:
Kolnikov the "age of consent" is the age you are legally allowed to consent to sex. Consent is an invited approval. Its meaning only applies to sex, not the drinking, smoking, driving, voting ages.

I said the same thing, don't take my stage.




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 3, 2014 7:22 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
traed said:
Kolnikov the "age of consent" is the age you are legally allowed to consent to sex. Consent is an invited approval. Its meaning only applies to sex, not the drinking, smoking, driving, voting ages.


Hmm okay, so I was wrong in some past statements. That probably led to misunderstandings. Sorry guys. Immahnoob already said though, everything is fine.
Dec 3, 2014 7:31 PM

Offline
May 2014
2380
as long as its 2d its no big deal.
Dec 3, 2014 7:36 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
>The thing is, about smoking and alcohol, although they are harmful, why do adults have the right to take that decision of harming themselves?

My worry is more about numbers than the subjective definition of adults and teenagers, that can vary. In some places you can drink with 16 if I'm not wrong. Either way, I guess the lesser the better. I'm not really liberal you see, so I wouldn't think something bad not letting the adults harming themselves. The thing is: when we define the correct age, and if we want some good investments (from the strong alcohol industry for example), you can't just say is wrong. Personally, I would cut marketing and such things.

For teenagers, since they're normally extremely dependents of their family, I think the problem isn't that simple. There are more implications to teenagers than to adults imho, but I would say both are wrong. Kind of hypocrisy, but I smoke. The difference is that I can smoke, and I pay with the money I earn. For normal teenagers though, it would be something more than that. While I consider it's indeed unfair; 18 you can, 17 you can't, I believe is better that way because of the numbers. If you try to not stimulate, then is for the best. When I was living in Austria, it really surprise me. Basically, of each 10 I saw, 8 were smoking lol. I guess teenagers are more energic as well, I really would be glad to minimize the problems.
blankflatDec 3, 2014 7:43 PM
Dec 3, 2014 7:43 PM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
So it's all about having your own money then? So, as long as you rely on someone (which you didn't choose to do necessarily) that means you have no right on certain things?

Sure, I dislike alcohol, drugs and smoking too, I'd love if they wouldn't be as popular as they are now, but the other way around can work too, liberal or not, I see no reason for one to not be able to "ruin" his own life if he so pleases, dependent on others or not, working or not, these aren't really relevant stances unless we're talking about morality.




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 3, 2014 7:55 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
>So, as long as you rely on someone (which you didn't choose to do necessarily) that means you have no right on certain things?

If you want, as you like to say, ''a valid, reasonable and relevant'' point to defend this, then I can't give you what you want. Because I honestly think there isn't any. Practically though, if you cut a whole group of people from this alcohol equation, give some scientific points to reinforce that, such as brain development, and say as general agreement that teenagers are under family protection or whatever, not really independent (nobody is, but I think you get it), then at very least you can reduce the numbers of people harming themselves, which is good. My conclusion? Is better not allowing some stuff. If you want to be universal and just, then we probably can't go anywhere. Someone has to pay after all, hehe.
Dec 3, 2014 7:58 PM
Offline
Jul 2018
561864
I don't see the appeal for loli characters honestly :\
Dec 3, 2014 8:01 PM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
Alcohol is known to be harmful, so is smoking, but there are other activities that are recreational yet they can be harmful too and are not taken into consideration here. Sports in an obsessive manner for example, or computer obsession etc. You'd say "But smoking and alcohol can be addictive.", so can many hobbies be deemed as "addictive".

Also, alcohol/smoking will not impede your brain development when you've finished "developing" yes, but they'll just lead to your brain "developing" faster during the adult phase... "Developing" towards your death.

The problem here is where should we be just and where should we not be just? Where can we limit ourselves if we don't limit "harmful" activities like these?




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 3, 2014 8:04 PM
Offline
Nov 2008
18019
lol
Dec 3, 2014 8:13 PM

Offline
Apr 2009
47
im 24, do i look like a pedo to you?
i like people who are mature, and high schoolers arent that
Dec 3, 2014 8:17 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
Immahnoob said:
Alcohol is known to be harmful, so is smoking, but there are other activities that are recreational yet they can be harmful too and are not taken into consideration here. Sports in an obsessive manner for example, or computer obsession etc. You'd say "But smoking and alcohol can be addictive.", so can many hobbies be deemed as "addictive".

Also, alcohol/smoking will not impede your brain development when you've finished "developing" yes, but they'll just lead to your brain "developing" faster during the adult phase... "Developing" towards your death.

The problem here is where should we be just and where should we not be just? Where can we limit ourselves if we don't limit "harmful" activities like these?


My solution for those problems would be letting the family decide. The problem is that the family is a failed institution, and can't handle their problems. They ask help for another institutions, so proper rules can be formulated to control what the family couldn't. For problems such as obsessions with ordinary things though, I guess the family could handle in a better way than the chemical stuff, and that is why we have medical treatment all around. So, no need to limit that.
Dec 3, 2014 8:27 PM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
But they're still harmful, how are smoking/alcohol different? After all, the obsessions are the ones that are immediately harmful.

Also, the "family should decide" isn't really a good thing to say in this situation, we're arguing over consent from the individual that is "harming" himself here.




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 3, 2014 8:57 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
Immahnoob said:
But they're still harmful, how are smoking/alcohol different? After all, the obsessions are the ones that are immediately harmful.

Also, the "family should decide" isn't really a good thing to say in this situation, we're arguing over consent from the individual that is "harming" himself here.


They're harmful, but what do you suggest? You can't put the finger in everything of their lives, I guess it would be even worse. But I see no problem in picking up some of them, the results aren't exactly good but is better that way. And if the problem is already there, you can't really treat everything and everyone. Also, what about the money to invest on all this? Not enough. I think the alcohol, which is more directly related to the overall public and driving, should receive priority. Normally the problem with alcohol isn't drinking, but drinking and doing shit to anyone that is not you. That's why I think it should receive more attention.

If the individual is all by himself, then there's nothing to be done unless if he himself search for medical treatment, which isn't likely to happen. Well, I see this is an endless conversation, and there are ton of things to consider...
Dec 3, 2014 9:42 PM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
You're just going on tangents that really have nothing to do with the topic we were discussing, that's the problem.




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 3, 2014 10:04 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
Immahnoob said:
You're just going on tangents that really have nothing to do with the topic we were discussing, that's the problem.


No, I'm answering your questions accordingly. The problem of the whole discussion, and every discussion that you start in this forum, is that you don't accept anything and keep trying to be against and in favor of every little thing, at the same time. You defend what you don't believe, you attack what you believe, and vice versa, just for the purpose of the discussion. This is your modus operandi. If I say square, you'll say circle, and then things won't stop spinning. That's how you have fun, probably. You like to play with words, and if someone answer your post, you just say is illogical, irrelevant, and use some word and the "logic" you create to act like a winner. That's the problem of the discussion; you're not here for discussing, you're here to play with words and call it logic.
blankflatDec 3, 2014 10:07 PM
Dec 3, 2014 10:15 PM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
This is the problem with someone that doesn't know how to discuss, they start blaming the opposition for their shortcomings. I don't make up "logic", "logic" remains objective and in a discussion it's almost always needed.

You're using words like "We can't do X to everyone" or "We can't do Y with our current money" when I never suggested that or was even talking about that, I only want to know where does the hypocrisy end and why does it end there. If teenagers can hurt themselves from any type of obsession, how does it make smoking/alcohol different? It's only harmful if it's an addiction/obsession, that's what we already know. So why bother making up these laws? Also, any other obsession/addiction can lead to you being harmful to people around you too.

We're not speaking about the "current social problems" because I don't see how smoking and alcohol are killing off the population of teenagers or adults yet.




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 3, 2014 10:19 PM

Offline
Dec 2013
291
more loli haters, eh?
Dec 3, 2014 10:20 PM

Offline
Apr 2009
47
what the fuck would you guys want with a underaged child anyways?
find someone your own age

this does not apply to people who are high school aged
Dec 3, 2014 10:35 PM
Offline
Nov 2013
2667
Immahnoob said:
I only want to know where does the hypocrisy end and why does it end there. If teenagers can hurt themselves from any type of obsession, how does it make smoking/alcohol different?


I could quote my last post that says you are not here for discussing, but that wouldn't help. Also, I've already answered those questions. Again, you just ignore what you don't want to see and call the rest "invalid". It won't change, you don't have a point and you just want to spread bullcrap, admit. I answered your questions already, if you can't find the part about hypocrisy and why I consider alcohol a different problem with different implications, especially for teenagers, then I'm sorry mate. If you're purposely doing this, that's okay, I'm going to sleep =D
Dec 4, 2014 12:57 AM

Offline
Mar 2013
1827
obsess over lolis - its a mental disease :P
Dec 4, 2014 1:02 AM

Offline
Feb 2014
2171
holy shit the amount of derailing and deterioration on this thread

OT: It's just the product of dicking around, some (emphasis on some) people are just being sarcastic and joking around. Although with most users I'm pretty sure that isn't the case. Not that it's a bad thing though, I don't judge your sexual interests because just being a dick.




Dec 4, 2014 1:24 AM

Offline
Dec 2013
291
Nisx said:
obsess over lolis - its a mental disease :P


false. it's adoration.
Dec 4, 2014 3:16 AM

Offline
Apr 2009
283
Pauper said:
I cry myself to sleep because I will never have a 2D gf


you have no swag
Dec 4, 2014 3:19 AM

Offline
Oct 2014
480
I neither really obsess over them nor act as such. They don't appeal to me.
"Dakimakura aren't meant for fucking." -Moog, January 2015

When a site's moderators warn you for condemning a troll, you know their moderators need to be changed out.
Dec 4, 2014 4:01 AM

Offline
Apr 2012
19559
Kolnikov said:
Immahnoob said:
I only want to know where does the hypocrisy end and why does it end there. If teenagers can hurt themselves from any type of obsession, how does it make smoking/alcohol different?


I could quote my last post that says you are not here for discussing, but that wouldn't help. Also, I've already answered those questions. Again, you just ignore what you don't want to see and call the rest "invalid". It won't change, you don't have a point and you just want to spread bullcrap, admit. I answered your questions already, if you can't find the part about hypocrisy and why I consider alcohol a different problem with different implications, especially for teenagers, then I'm sorry mate. If you're purposely doing this, that's okay, I'm going to sleep =D
There was no answer.




Autocrat said:
Hitler was good, objectively.
Dec 4, 2014 10:23 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
561864
Pauper said:
I cry myself to sleep because I will never have a 2D gf
Pages (4) « First ... « 2 3 [4]

More topics from this board

» Why does media hype up 16th birthdays

Pandemoniumm - Oct 12

27 by XMGA030 »»
55 seconds ago

» The Rise Of AI? ( 1 2 )

DigiCat - Oct 2

77 by DigiCat »»
42 minutes ago

» What do you think of men who act like it's manly to disregard their health or well-being? ( 1 2 )

fleurbleue - Yesterday

56 by LoveYourSmile »»
45 minutes ago

» How do you react to bad restaurant service? Do you complain when that happens?

Rinrinka - Sep 27

22 by GakutoDeathGlare »»
59 minutes ago

» It's interesting how our perception of who's a hero and who's a villain has changed.

NotYourLittleSis - 11 hours ago

9 by XMGA030 »»
1 hour ago
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login