DarkPaladinX said:SolviteSekai said:
This show is for lack of a better word, trash.
It's rushed, and even when it isn't rushed, the premise is really dumb.
You have giant ninja dudes with buster swords fighting with gunman dolphin loli girls and shit.
How is this shit rated 7.8? I mean I know everything gets rated highly on mal, but even fucking DxD and other decent to good shows cant get this high.
Someone explain to me why I'm not getting it, because I'm a cynical dick and sometimes I just am too hard on things.
Oh, it's you again, the guy who takes other people's opinion too objectively.
Anyways, let me give you an explanation here in regards to MAL statistics. It is organized by the number by number of people who have knowledge of the show (labeled "members"), popularity, rank (the website said it's based on the top anime page, but I have no idea how it's calculated), and favorites. The website tries objective data where some of such data can be very subjective (except for the "members" part, which includes how many people is watching the anime, how many completed it, holding it, dropped, and plan to watch). The score stat, in particular, is based on the total average of how many people scored the series. Even so, the score ratings are highly subjective data.
If I were to use the same data gathering system and go to
other anime websites such as Anime-Planet or Anime News Network, I would get completely different results because the anime community may either may either don't like lolis, have a completely different anime taste, or have a different opinion. Thus being said, the stats that this site gathers is objective data which is subjective.
Now, in regards to anime being "successful," anime companies don't give a shit on opinions (the subjective data), they go for the objective data such as how many people watched the series on the day it was aired, the streaming views, the impact of sales of the original source material, BD/DVD sales, etc. The MAL data may be put into consideration, but you must remember that it's still subjective data gathered objectively. Apparently, that goes for the same with what gets dubbed or not in the American anime industry, as Sentai Filmworks (the folks who licensed this series) makes their dubbing decisions based on objective data as well, but recently have left several popular ranking shows subbed-only, indicating subjective decisions from Sentai Filmwork's part.
Now, objectively speaking, Black Bullet is doing okay. It's expected that the first volume to sell 2,000 units in Japan and the origiinal LN experienced a 80% increase of sales since the anime aired. Thus being said, just because an anime is "popular" subjectively doesn't mean the anime will do well objectively. Take a look at Hitman Reborn, it's subjectively very popular, but in terms of Crunchyroll streaming numbers (the objective data), it didn't do that well (which is why Viz Media never picked the series up for home video rights). And then you have Sword Art Online, which objectively speaking, is one of the most watched anime , but is very polarizing subjectively.
EDIT: AND to add extra insult to your injury. Black Bullet was listed number one in the popularity rankings at one point at Crunchyroll. Mind you that popularity rankings tend to fluctuate too easily in Crunchyroll.