Do you think that MAL sigs should be allowed to be larger?
No. They should be the same (110)
15.6%
5
No. They should be the same (140)
65.6%
21
No. They should be the same (Some Other Height)
6.3%
2
Yes. MAL sigs should be taller (140 vs 110)
12.5%
4
Yes. MAL sigs should be taller (different ratio)
0.0%
0
32 votes
| I support this idea. You guys are being ridiculous. |
<img src="http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff227/PocketAsianNano/Izaya-sig-1.gif?t=1269484673" border="0" /> |
| 125px max for all, settle half way between the two! |
| lol @ my sig |
  |
| I support this idea. I think it should be 140px for all sigs. It has to be for MAL sigs so that you can have room to display the list updates, and then I think it should be the same for non-MAL sigs for consistency. |
| Sounds like a decent idea to me. Though, I'll stick to sexy slim signatures. |
 |
| Yeah let's fucking crack some skulls. |
ScrumYummy said: I support this idea. I think it should be 140px for all sigs. It has to be for MAL sigs so that you can have room to display the list updates, and then I think it should be the same for non-MAL sigs for consistency. This. I never understood why normal signatures can't be 140px also. I support this idea. |
| I have seen huge sig all over the club section. Apparently, it seems that the ones with the huge sig are never seen in the main forum section and thus, it is okay to have sig that takes up half a page. |
 |
EddieHitler said: Yeah let's fucking crack some skulls. |
Kira01 said: I have seen huge sig all over the club section. Apparently, it seems that the ones with the huge sig are never seen in the main forum section and thus, it is okay to have sig that takes up half a page. wrong, those are just the ones we haven't spotted |
| I support this idea. There seems to be no real reason not to implement this at this point. |
kei-clone said: Kira01 said: I have seen huge sig all over the club section. Apparently, it seems that the ones with the huge sig are never seen in the main forum section and thus, it is okay to have sig that takes up half a page. wrong, those are just the ones we haven't spotted Actually, I do realize it. I had been seeing those for the past few months.. |
|
Kira01 said: Well, the people who post out in the general forums are more likely to attract attention, because the mods are always there to see posts. But if someone posts only in clubs, they might not be picked up on as quickly, unless they're reported, or someone comes by those club threads. However, in general the rules are the same, and when they come out they'll get caught. The limits on sigs should be definite though. Uniformity seems like a good idea, regardless of the absolute height.kei-clone said: Kira01 said: I have seen huge sig all over the club section. Apparently, it seems that the ones with the huge sig are never seen in the main forum section and thus, it is okay to have sig that takes up half a page. wrong, those are just the ones we haven't spotted Actually, I do realize it. I had been seeing those for the past few months.. |
olmecalmightyJun 23, 2009 10:00 PM
llxwarbirdxll said: Support; I'm not a fan of inconsistency either. |
 watching, waiting, commiserating |
EddieSpaghetti said: Hey your sig is too tall.Yeah let's fucking crack some skulls. |
Vipey said: lol @ my sig To be fair, no one cares about your signature. |
| I can see no reason why not to support this. |
 |
| I support. I like my signatures to be 120x. |
llxwarbirdxll said: Support; I'm not a fan of inconsistency either. |
 |
| hmmm..... i support this too! btw, my sigs are now the at the okay size right? |
     I am formerly known as "AnimePrincezz" on MAL, I change my username to "Rinjii", the Japanese name for my real name. |
RenaPsychoKiller said: llxwarbirdxll said: Support; I'm not a fan of inconsistency either. |
| This idea has my sword. |
 |
| I believe that the current forum signature limits on non-mal sigs is obsolete. I understand that when people used to visible updates for their signatures that sure, it could be larger to accommodate the updates. However, at this point with people putting only 1 update, or making php signatures with incredibly hard to read updates, it is fairly meaningless to restrict non-mal sigs. Heck, I think the larger non-mal sigs will often be more simple looking, and hardly any more an eye sore. |
BourskOct 15, 2009 2:56 PM
| I think 140 should be the maximum height for any type of sig, mal updates or not. Most of the sig infractions I see are in the area of "140 px but not mal sig." Would be a lot easier to stop caring about that, since I really don't get why sigs with mal updates are given special treatment. p.s. My sig is not making fun of that by the way! I originally made it to be a sig w/o updates but then added them later because I thought they were cute. |
| Yes, I still merged it, since I didn't feel that the "current situation" is that much different from 2 months ago. I kept your poll though, since that does have merit. Threads merged Edit: Considering this thread has now been changed from a general MAL question to a suggestion asking for a change....... Thread moved |
BourskAug 31, 2009 10:44 PM
| I'm definitely all for consistency, 140px sounds good and will require the least amount of hassle. |
pim said: This idea has my sword. And my axe. I thought 140 was a bit too much anyway, but it's fine for consistency. |
| My vote: No. They should be the same (140) |
|
Boursk said: Thread moved To where I originally put it.. D: |
Indirect_Purple said: Boursk said: Thread moved To where I originally put it.. D: no, because you created another thread. yours was merged with this one, which was in another forum. the poll is a good addition though. /explanation on topic > mal signatures are relatively tame compared to some other forums, where the max is much bigger. but usually the max is the max. so, good idea. |
| I support. Its good to have one limit for all sigs, this will get rid of some of the confusion from new members as well. |
DramaQueen said: Psh, I can swear if I want in the OP, I'm not addressing the government. Even then, fuck that. Bump. OP knows how to piss off mods. +1 for sexy slim sigs. |
| | Suikoden Fan Club[/right] |
| So, any action on this? |
Indirect_Purple said: I have heard that reporting 140px sigs w/o updates is not being enforced nearly as strictly as it once was. So, any action on this? Would be nice if the rules could be updated so there is no confusion about this, though. |
-Shio said: /support |
 |
LolitaDecay said: -Shio said: /support |
| It took a while, but the signature rules have been changed. See the General Forum Guidelines. Thread locked |
Boursk said: It took a while, but the signature rules have been changed. See the General Forum Guidelines. Thread locked Awesome! I think this will be for the best. Especially with the onslaught of newer members; it will make things less confusing. Should somebody make an announcement? (Or shall we just let people figure it out?) It's a pretty big change. |
More topics from this board
» An option to display your created stacks in other people's interest stack lists_cjessop19_ - Oct 19 |
1 |
by henry567cowan
»»
51 minutes ago |
|
» Can there be a different completed status for rewatching a show?Rally- - Oct 3 |
7 |
by Emmataylor
»»
12 hours ago |
|
» Suggestion for new age ratings on MAL (Loosely based on kijkwijzer and OFLC NZ)mg1109 - Oct 23 |
22 |
by stefanoiulli1999
»»
Today, 12:02 AM |
|
Poll: » Filtering Out Anime SeriesScamaz - Yesterday |
0 |
by Scamaz
»»
Yesterday, 7:52 PM |
|
» new list option - "Maybe"dailydi - Oct 12 |
10 |
by LittleStar
»»
Yesterday, 6:35 AM |