I'm ma1kawa11, but you can also call me Mai. I'm an avid anime enjoyer, and musician.
I started getting into anime back in 2019. The first anime I ever watched was "The Third: The Girl with the Blue Eye" which was one of the only anime titles available at my local library. And then from there it took off! I use MAL primarily as a way to keep track of what I've watched but also sometimes I'll give a review.
I believe that the world is the foundation of the entire anime, the characters bring life to the world, and the story creates a narration and development of characters and the world. Art/Sound/Animations are the expressions by which the plot is visualized or heard, by, and although they can make or break something, they aren't the actual foundation itself.
I Hope you enjoy my profile!!! :D
I judge an anime based considering multiple factors, based on different topics of design of which there is an outline below:
Overall: (X/10)
Worldbuilding:
The depth and quality of the world
The quality of the development of the world
The logical coherence of the world
The way the atmosphere of the world relates, affects, and benefits the plot and genre.
Plot:
How the plot innovates its genre
The structure, pacing, and form of the plot/arc. The consistency of each arc in the scope of the entire series.
The logical coherency of the plot
Minimal use of Cliches, and if/when they are used, the quality to which they are used.
Power scaling (if applicable), or the buildup towards the climax.
quality of the introduction
quality of the ending
Minimal use of flashbacks (and if they are used, the proper use of them)
Characters:
Whether the characters are primarily three dimensional versus one/two dimensional.
Strong Protagonist/Antagonist if applicable.
Characters have a complex sense of morality (no absolute good or evil)
Minimal use of cliches and tropes in personalities or motivations (and if they are used the quality to which they are used).
Strong Character Development.
The realisticness of a Character (would the character make sense as an actual person)
Informed and correct portrayal of minority groups (e.g. LGBTQ+, racial minorities, sex, disabilities) if any. I judge this relative to the time the show was produced.
Art:
The graphical quality of the art style.
The consistency of the quality of the art style throughout the series.
How well the art style matches or fits in the genre.
CGI quality.
Animation:
The production quality of the animation.
The consistency of the animation quality throughout the series.
A distinct animation style which fits and coordinates with the art style.
Sound:
Voice Acting:
Quality of voice actors.
Ability to express a wide variety of emotions and express themselves as their characters.
SFX:
SFX Production Quality
Emotional Impact and logical choice of SFX.
Music:
Production Quality (bitrates, quality of performance, etc.)
Appropriate emotional impact for scenes, consistency of genre to create that impact.
Good compositional techniques (lack of cliche chord progressions, good melody writing, good instrumentation, etc.).
There are a few types of things which significantly affect my rating of a show other than the rubric that is shown above to the point where a score my drop by a full point or more if depicted in a show:
Use of Fanservice
Inappropriate, Immoral, or Strong Sexualization
Defending Discriminatory Ideals
Non-Satirical Political Bias
Additional Notes:
I watch and review anime exclusively based on their english sub because of the inconsistencies of the voice acting quality in english dubs.
When I make a formal review on a show, I may summarize or exclude some or most of this information based on their relevance to the main points I want to make. This allows me to keep my review simple and concise if need be.
I define my scores fairly obviously, I follow the general idea behind myanimelist descriptions of each number. This number is determined by my rating rubric. Following is a slightly more elaborate description of how I define the myanimelist score system.
10 - A Masterpiece: Shows that are as close to perfection as possible.
9 - Excellent: Shows that are close to being a masterpiece, but are not entirely perfect.
8 - Great: Shows that are extremely enjoyable but have small issues in a few areas of my rating system.
7 - Good: Shows that are very enjoyable but have issues in a few or several areas of my rating system which have affected overall quality.
6 - Okay: Shows that are enjoyable, but have prominent issues that while outweighed by the show's strengths, have significant impact to overall quality.
5 - Average: Shows which do not stand out, and generally have an equal distribution of strengths and weaknesses.
4 - Meh: Shows which might have certain strengths, but overtaken by significant issues to the point where it has outweighed the strengths and affects enjoyment.
3 - Bad: Shows that suffer from extremely major issues in a large amount of different areas and significantly outweigh the show's few strengths, as a result not being very enjoyable to watch.
2 - Very Bad: Shows that are extremely unenjoyable due to having almost no positive aspects whatsoever. Nearly a catastrophe.
1 - Terrible: Shows that are a catastrophe, nearly zero positive aspects of the show whatsoever.
So hopefully this gives a bit of an idea what I think when I give a show a number.
I judge series both on a bell curve and by my standards as I've described above. This means that my rating of shows is influenced by the total number of shows I've seen. Since I am aiming for a bell curve, as the number of shows I have seen goes up, the mean score of shows will tend to approach between 5. However in application, my mean tends to be balanced between 5-6. This is because while I try to be balanced in the shows I am watching and my rating of a show, because I enjoy anime, I have a natural bias to watch shows that I am interested in. This means that my curve will always be slightly skewed, though with my rating system this has been somewhat mitigated. Below is my current distribution of scores, I try and update this roughly ever 10 new entries to my list:
I define my favorites as following:
Manga/Anime:
My Manga/Anime favorites are purely subjective based on my enjoyment of the show. I don't follow any of my guidelines for ratings with my favorites, so while my favorites tend to be things I've rated highly, it doesn't necessarily mean that they will always be the most highly rated.
Characters:
My favorite Manga/Anime Characters are primarily chosen through a combination of how well I think the character was written, and how well I can relate to them. Does not necessarily mean that they are from my favorite anime/manga and also doesn't mean I rate the show more highly.
People:
This section is dedicated purely to my favorite composers from anime I've seen.
Companies:
These are a list of production companies that are generally behind anime that I have rated highly or are on my favorites list.
Drop: I do not drop anime, if I watch or complete a first episode I will complete it and give it a rating. If I do not finish something I will add it to an "On Hold" section to watch later. I do not rate shows I have not completed because I do not have a full perspective on the show and all of its strengths and weaknesses.
Hold: If for some reason I have not finished a show, I will put that show on hold. While on hold the show will not receive a rating. I do not have any timeline where I may finish a show, but I do plan at some point to finish watching it.
If you have read a review or a post of mine and disagree, feel free to criticize me! I'm always open to hearing other people's viewpoints, and I also want to refine my own skills at reviewing shows. Just please keep these things in mind when criticizing me:
Please be civil and respectful in your criticism. I'm looking for constructive criticism on how to improve, not insults.
Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean my opinion isn't valid.
Don't expect me to change my mind. I'm open to hearing and trying to understand your views, and I will definately take into consideration what you say. However that does not necessarily mean I will automatically agree with you and if I don't, please don't get upset over it.
With that in mind, I totally look forward to hearing your opinions! :D
Hi, thanks :)
I also love Legend of the Galactic Heroes, Metropolis and Terror in Resonance from your list, but my free list can only hold 10 titles hehe
I'm curious, how did you find me in MAL?
The first one was some similar Christian one, I guess? Have you seen Mawaru Penguindrum? I can't claim that it's good. I'm not sure, and it's not about being in a cult, but it's... I guess about the impact and subtle reverberations of having been associated with one and its impact on society. It has a weird way of presenting it, so you won't pick up on it at first. It incorporates the Aum Shinrikyo sarin gas attack into its narrative, which kind of feels like a spoiler lol, but I knew about it when going into it.
Just make sure it's the 1970s version of Wickerman unless you're looking for a comedy. X)
What kind of cult was it, if you don't mind answering?
Well, these kind of critiques of capitalism tend to be framed purely in terms of economics. I feel propaganda has always been more important than money when it comes to media, and what is profitable will sometimes be rejected because it's not in line with current and developing propaganda trends. The way parent companies and global markets work, they can often afford losses. A loss in one area can be recouped in another. And if even a small percentage of the Indian or Chinese market watch something, then that's a big profit.
I haven't read the original manga either, but, from what I've heard, the old 1980s OVA is much more faithful. Yuasa applied an aesthetic reminiscent of his other films/series and turned it into a silly high school thing with a lot of bad additions. If you don't mind the amount of violence and you think the trailer for the 1980s Devilman OVA looks good, then I'd suggest it.
From what I recall with class struggle, there's something about the upper class drafting or pushing the lower class into war, and I can definitely see that in the OVA, with the rich guy enlisting the help of the MC. Crybaby? I don't remember but I doubt it.
I don't like Crybaby either. It's a watering down of Yuasa's past glory, it's Netflix produced, a poor adaptation, and I don't think it does anything that well.
Nowadays "stereotypically villainous" almost always means not. Usually when I watch a murder mystery there's one person who is too obvious and can be ruled out immediately. Even if they make a twisty plot where you've come to not suspect them and then fake you out, it just doesn't seem to work to use the character for that.
I'm not a big fan of Midsommar, but I do like a lot of the imagery. It's interesting how much of the art that we see on the walls explains the process of the rituals and such. Do you like Wicker Man too? More so the older one than the Nicholas Cage one. X) I thought I remembered it having a good OST.
I guess it's not surprising. I feel like film craftsmanship has mostly dropped as a whole, so something that's a bit more difficult to do well like horror will fall even harder. And then you get a lot of the gross stuff to replace atmosphere or effective construction or anything like that.
The most memorable horror work for me that came out in the last few years was probably Petscop, but that's a fake "let's play" series rather than a movie.
I'm surprised you disliked Devilman Crybaby so much, but it honestly is a pretty bad adaptation. The first Devilman OVA is more like a horror film, and I think it's a much better adaptation. The only people disagreeing are probably people coping because daddy Yuasa failed them. X) Has a Kenji Kawai score too, I think.
It's kind of funny how crammed and fast it becomes because it starts off a little slow... I winced in pain thinking about 12 episodes, but there are a lot of directions they could have gone in and ways in which they could have expanded the characters. A lot of the ideas they had would work with the right script and direction.
Was the big guy named Khan? I think a lot of people were weirded out by the cheap trick early on to make us think he was a killer. That was supposed to be a previous loop that ended badly, right? In retrospect, that's probably the only thing that would make sense because I don't think the early "bad Khan" events mesh well with what happened in the ending episodes.
But yeah, the cult family... it would be interesting to rewatch to see if there are any solid hints. Though I don't think I can do it, knowing how frustrating the whole thing is. There's a sort of investment in their friendship that makes the twist ridiculous. Would have been better if the daughter were more conflicted, and it was mostly just the parents.
Yeah, horror is in a bad state in general. It's too bad, as I really like horror, but I don't watch them now as there's nothing to choose from. Most anime horror is mixed with shonen action or comedy too, so little of what is classified as horror is what I'd truly call horror. Instead of genre, it's more like a theme of horror imagery. I'm looking forward to the Uzumaki adaptation. Though I'm kind of hoping they'll take some artistic license with the script a little bit. The manga's episodic nature is too loose and lacking in emotion, even though I like it.
I guess I'll put this in a spoiler tag for anyone who might stumble into your comment box, since this series doesn't have much going for it other than the mystery. Yeah, what I didn't mention, as I think it wasn't a spoiler review, was how ridiculous the twist was. I didn't think it would go to quite that level, as that's more like insane VN territory, but I think we all knew something was a little off with Kimi at least. The dead dog scene was probably too much foreshadowing. :S
The other girl being an unhinged killer in a cult was much worse. If any character would benefit from more dimensionality, then it was probably her.
Lovecraft had different periods, but he's most known for the nihilistic stories where humanity learns of a terrible god that sees them as nothing but cattle, like Cthulhu. That's what Kimi is... except not quite because she's running an experiment to make all of those humans in that area live peacefully together. What I really don't like about it is how condescending Kimi is. You're a Lovecraftian cosmic entity, Kimi. How can you expect a completely different species to act like you? Why do you want them to act like you? Most of all, how do you expect them to ever get along if there's your secret cult that's antagonizing and offing them one-by-one? XD
It's been a while since I've seen it, but didn't the three cultists see the moss as a sign from their god that fueled their actions? That makes it even more ridiculous. Kimi acts above it, but she's part of it. That feels like a mistake to me, and the series is so crammed together and rushed that I wouldn't be surprised if it is.
Right, I was wondering who composed it, but I don't think it's credited on MAL (I just saw information for theme songs). That's a good choice to use the original music.
Is the story somewhat original or more like a crammed remake of the series?
I wouldn't mind trying the games, but I haven't really played anything in a few years. I'd really like to play the new Armored Core, though. I remember it was a niche game series back in the day, but I can see it getting pretty popular now.
lol speaking of AC, the composer for that did a weird soundtrack for a PS2 game.
Oh, during that season, I briefly wrote about it when I was experimenting with the blog feature, and I deleted the blog. I must have watched around 2-3 eps, but something about Nier prevented me from wanting to mark it as dropped. Nothing about it left much of an impression on me, but I don't know what direction it ultimately took, and I have no experience with the game series. As a game, Nier looks to have a solid aesthetic, but the anime has dated CGI (I recall comparing it to a Gamecube game) and seems subpar or just average in almost every way. I remember liking the music from the game OSTs, but I'm not sure if the anime is of a similar quality (it probably isn't). I can't imagine fans of the game being too impressed by it, or non-fans getting much out of it compared to other sci-fi titles with a similar rating. The series has a fairly high rating for a game adaptation, but I don't know if that's a case of it shaping into something decent or Nier superfans wanting to suck up every ounce of the franchise that they can find...
All Comments (76) Comments
I also love Legend of the Galactic Heroes, Metropolis and Terror in Resonance from your list, but my free list can only hold 10 titles hehe
I'm curious, how did you find me in MAL?
infact that's not truly saying anything because the manga has more fucked shit in it
What kind of cult was it, if you don't mind answering?
Well, these kind of critiques of capitalism tend to be framed purely in terms of economics. I feel propaganda has always been more important than money when it comes to media, and what is profitable will sometimes be rejected because it's not in line with current and developing propaganda trends. The way parent companies and global markets work, they can often afford losses. A loss in one area can be recouped in another. And if even a small percentage of the Indian or Chinese market watch something, then that's a big profit.
I haven't read the original manga either, but, from what I've heard, the old 1980s OVA is much more faithful. Yuasa applied an aesthetic reminiscent of his other films/series and turned it into a silly high school thing with a lot of bad additions. If you don't mind the amount of violence and you think the trailer for the 1980s Devilman OVA looks good, then I'd suggest it.
https://myanimelist.net/anime/2354/Devilman__Tanjou-hen
From what I recall with class struggle, there's something about the upper class drafting or pushing the lower class into war, and I can definitely see that in the OVA, with the rich guy enlisting the help of the MC. Crybaby? I don't remember but I doubt it.
I don't like Crybaby either. It's a watering down of Yuasa's past glory, it's Netflix produced, a poor adaptation, and I don't think it does anything that well.
I'm not a big fan of Midsommar, but I do like a lot of the imagery. It's interesting how much of the art that we see on the walls explains the process of the rituals and such. Do you like Wicker Man too? More so the older one than the Nicholas Cage one. X) I thought I remembered it having a good OST.
I guess it's not surprising. I feel like film craftsmanship has mostly dropped as a whole, so something that's a bit more difficult to do well like horror will fall even harder. And then you get a lot of the gross stuff to replace atmosphere or effective construction or anything like that.
The most memorable horror work for me that came out in the last few years was probably Petscop, but that's a fake "let's play" series rather than a movie.
I'm surprised you disliked Devilman Crybaby so much, but it honestly is a pretty bad adaptation. The first Devilman OVA is more like a horror film, and I think it's a much better adaptation. The only people disagreeing are probably people coping because daddy Yuasa failed them. X) Has a Kenji Kawai score too, I think.
Is the story somewhat original or more like a crammed remake of the series?
I wouldn't mind trying the games, but I haven't really played anything in a few years. I'd really like to play the new Armored Core, though. I remember it was a niche game series back in the day, but I can see it getting pretty popular now.
lol speaking of AC, the composer for that did a weird soundtrack for a PS2 game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgJbPYDVgwM
Maybe it'd interest you. Definitely stands out for a game OST. It's somewhat difficult to imagine what each track would have been set to!
That why I don’t go lurking in there anymore
And what I’ve seen I can smell the loser from my computer