Quero deixar claro que:
Não gosto de anime;
Não gosto de otaku;
Não gosto de moe;
Não gosto de waifu; e
Não gosto de ecchi.
O que eu gosto são obras orientais que estejam veementemente imbuídas com um alto valor artístico, sendo eu quem define quais obras se encaixam nesse perfil.
Statistics
Anime History Last Anime Updates
Yuusha-kei ni Shosu: Choubatsu Yuusha 9004-tai Keimu Kiroku
Mar 24, 5:35 PM
Plan to Watch
· Scored
-
All Manga Stats Manga Stats
Days: 54.1
Mean Score:
5.38
- Total Entries100
- Reread0
- Chapters5,733
- Volumes272
All Comments (85) Comments
Praise the fool
Frieren - 1 😡
"The animation might fool some into thinking it's a good anime, but it's not."
I think this is indicative of why your review fails at being, well, a review and also shows the leap in logic present in a lot of negative reviews that try to deem something as "trash". So, let's quickly go over what makes a show good, it can be entertaining, which is the first and probably most important aspect as the second can't function without it. And secondly, it can teach. Morals are what take a story from an entertaining way to waste an afternoon, to a piece of art that can change one's life for the better. The overall consensus though seems to be, that a show that is consistently entertaining, is at the very least a good one, and I am going to argue this point by using Gintama as an example. While Gintama undeniably has a lot of moral conflicts and aspects, these are of quite little concern to the majority of episodes. It is a gag-manga or rather anime first and foremost and those gags are the first aspect of what makes a good show, they are entertaining and not a lot more. Just to make this clear, they don't need to be more than that, you can have simple entertainment and let it work really well, for example the episode in which Gin and Hijikata get a lottery ticket and end up robbing a bank is not about morals, it's about being a funny as heck episode and sure enough it is. It's a good episode, I wouldn't call it a 10/10 masterpiece, but I really goddamn liked those 20ish minutes of animation. In other words, the fact that I like it, is enough to make it good or to rephrase it once again, you can't be fooled into liking something, you can be made to believe something to be deeper then it is, but the simple act of liking a show is enough to make it good. So while you can argue that Frieren is not as deep a show as people make it sound, you can't argue that it is a bad show, because people enjoyed it and enjoyment isn't wrong, unless there is a moral problem connected with it, for example, if a show is openly racist, it might be wrong to enjoy it, but that is a moral problem that I neither can nor want to get into. All that is of importance to us, is that Frieren is not a "morally wrong" show and is just an entertaining piece of fiction a lot of people enjoy, and thus it is already undeniably a good show, it didn't "fool" its audience, the same way Gintama didn't "fool" you when you laughed at its jokes, making someone enjoy your piece of work is not morally questionable, it is just you being successful at entertaining others.
The last thing that I could argue here, is that there is also a lot of moral value in the story of Frieren, which would make it more than just simple entertainment, but I don't need to do that to disprove your point, because you didn't argue in the first place, saying that "thing be bad" doesn't have value beyond the fact that it is your opinion, and thus I really don't need to bother, because I couldn't change your mind either way.
Have an A1-Day, and don't take this as a personal attack, it is a critique, you know, that thing a review is supposed to be.