Forum Settings
Forums
New
How would you rate this character?
Feb 8, 2013 4:12 AM
#1

Offline
Feb 2008
2484
Spotlight Character: Taeko Okajima (Omoide Poporo)



MAL Character Information Page: Taeko Okajima


MAL Favorites: 13


Original Spotlight thread: Taeko Okajima (Only Yesterday)


For the next two weeks I would like to have everyone familiar with this character discuss what they think makes it an exceptional character. What attributes make it stand out in the ocean of interesting characters that exist in the realms of anime and manga.

Unlike the other two subjects I will not force this conversation to fall into any set structure. Characters that are nominated typically get here because they are adept at breaking the existing character moulds and defying definition.

Because of this freedom I encourage everyone to do their very best to stay on topic and keep any and all debate civil. Have fun and I look forward to seeing what everyone has to say about this character.



RESULTS OF THE RESURRECTION POLL

Taeko Okajima was PERMANENTLY BARRED from induction into the club Character list:
18 Yes - 51.4%
17 No - 29.0%

30 Don't know this character - 42.8% of the total number polled
5 Abstained - 7.1% of the total number polled
santetjanMar 1, 2013 4:33 AM
You do not beg the sun for mercy.
Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members
Feb 8, 2013 4:17 AM
#2

Offline
Sep 2009
2972
Really little more than an extension of the movie. Easy no.
Feb 20, 2013 10:39 PM
#3

Offline
Feb 2008
4350
Pretty much what Lindle said. Since the movie has already been inducted, I see no reason to vote for the character on the exact same merits.
Feb 21, 2013 4:55 PM
#4

Offline
Sep 2009
227
Lindle said:
Really little more than an extension of the movie. Easy no.

Quite the contrary, actually. It is the movie that is an extension of the character. The main purpose of the story is to outline Taeko's dissatisfaction with her current lifestyle, stale both personally and professionally: she still is single and living alone; no longer in the bloom of youth, her job – monotonous and dull – limits her scouting of new prospects; the stress is building up and the uncertainty is mounting. Her trips to the countryside are only the result of the combination of these factors, and said trips are what leads the character's to recollect her childhood memories and to reflect on her present, and consequently her future – I think I already elaborated on this well enough in the anime's spotlight thread. The movie is about Taeko Okajima, and indeed, its success is closely related to her memories and personal development. For a good reason it is called Omohide Poro Poro...

However, I am unable to understand the point of bringing up the film as an argument against Taeko's induction. Not only are they judged on different criteria, but the character's reminiscences and self-discoveries are only a part of the whole picture – what about the equally realistic secondary cast, or the harmony between the art and animation directing, and the script? Moreover, if the movie's main qualities take form in Taeko's characterization, then it is entirely fair to use them to evaluate the personage's motives, internal thoughts, actions and developments. If a story is exemplary because of a character, then it reasonable to conclude that said character is exemplary as well, and therefore worth of induction. And that, Taeko is in my view. Perhaps it could be argued that she doesn't have that particular differential to make her deserve a spot in the club's relations; after all, what's so impressive about a character who leads a mundane life? I say that the fact that she succeeds in being a realistic portrayal of a conflicted adult, with personal and interpersonal development stemming from recollections, reflections and interactions with other human beings, is a commendable achievement by itself – how many normal characters in the medium can actually be said to have accomplished this? From my experience, very few, and that the movie managed such feat within 2 hours is all the more impressive.

In any case, I won't bother elaborating further here. lpf will probably write something in the character's defense tomorrow, and I'm sure he can do a better job than I can (plus I'm too lazy to do that at the moment).
Feb 22, 2013 2:57 PM
#5
Offline
Aug 2010
1056
It has been said, for being a realistic character, Taeko lacks the something our other characters have. But Taeko has a solid characterisation, smooth development, introspection, and a backstory with actual relevance; her character alone drives the whole screenplay forward. So what ever is it that she could be lacking?

The premise of the film – an office lady on a trip to the countryside – relies on Taeko's characterisation. As consistently and thoroughly depicted throughout the film, she lived a Tokyoite life (and so did her family for several generations), and she also was one of the only children in her class not to have anywhere in the countryside to go to during the holidays. Composing a major part of the film, this forms a very solid basis for Taeko's attraction towards the countryside and the resulting storyline Ghibli added to the manga.

Taeko also undergoes development in the film. As a natural result of showing her (phony) interest towards the countryside and coming to her relatives' place regularly, as well as a result of the conspicuous dynamic between her and the other protagonist, she was asked to stay there and marry him; that acted as the trigger for introspection and rightful embarrassment over her phony taste for the countryside, creating a truly human side to Taeko. Even more impressive, this introspection led to the decision of staying, a major development which, despite that, was pulled off very naturally: well done.

Lastly, Taeko is largely defined by her backstory. In itself, this backstory is interesting; as I focus on in the movie's spotlight the adventures of childhood are depicted both realistically and beautifully. The most interesting part, though, is how well incorporated it is to the adult Taeko – in form and substance. Form, because the transitions between present and past, the mix between them, are done very poetically all the while remaining perfectly limpid and distinct. Substance, because Taeko's past is often brought up in relation to the happenings of the present scene, and they actually drive the dialogue forward by elaborating on present subjects with past experiences.

Those of you who have seen Millennium Actress know what it is to get muddled up trying to weave together present and past. And those of you who have seen Fate/Zero S2 know how easy it is to provide backstory with no relevance to the story.

Saying that she is the movie would be an understated way of putting it. Taeko does something great that only excellent characters do: as I have already said enough times, her well-rounded and solid character drives the film forward. Clap clap clap clap.

Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members

More topics from this board

Sticky: » The End of Critics and Connoisseurs

HiroM_ - Dec 31, 2022

31 by danz »»
Nov 10, 2023 1:08 AM

» Challenge You Decide: Neon Genesis Evangelion: The End of Evangelion (Anime) (1/1)

HiroM_ - Dec 3, 2022

44 by 25saix »»
Dec 30, 2022 3:10 PM

» You Decide: Golden Kamuy 2nd Season (Anime) (12/4)

HiroM_ - Dec 2, 2022

42 by 25saix »»
Dec 30, 2022 3:10 PM

» Resurrected You Decide: Mahou Shoujo Madoka★Magica (Anime) (12/4)

HiroM_ - Dec 2, 2022

47 by 25saix »»
Dec 30, 2022 3:09 PM

» Blue N Rescue Mission: Eikoku Koi Monogatari Emma (Anime) (12/4)

HiroM_ - Dec 3, 2022

24 by Dramaddict »»
Dec 28, 2022 6:02 PM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login